April 2011 - lac-discuss-en

Re: [lac-discuss-en] REMINDER: Teleconferencing of LACRALO - Thursday, the 21 UTC Of April 21:00
by fatimacambronero＠gmail.com April 15, 2011

April 15, 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: REMINDER: Teleconferencing of LACRALO - Thursday, the 21 UTC Of April 21:00 From: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com Andrés, all, This next Thursday I am going to be traveling to the estimated time for ours monthly teleconferencing of LACRALO. I adhere to the order of reprogramar it. Thanks. Warm greetings, Fatima The 14 of April of 2011 21:14, Jose Ovid Salgueiro <salgueiro.jo(a)gmail.com>it wrote: > I am going to be in the beach with my family that day > > JOS > > > > > Sent from my BlackBerry de Movistar > > -----Original Message > From: andrespiazza(a)gmail.com > Sender: lac-discuss-it is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 00:11:59 > To: <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Reply-To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org< > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] REMINDER: Teleconferencing of LACRALO - > Thursday, Of The 21 UTC Of April 21:00 > > > [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]] > > > Subject: Re: REMINDER: Teleconferencing of LACRALO - Thursday, the 21 UTC Of > April 21:00 > Of: andrespiazza(a)gmail.com > > (Spanish Down) > > Wanted All, > > Somebody remembered to me that next Thursday is holidays in most of > our countries, > due to Passover. Perhaps we needed to change the hour of > nuestrateleconferencia for later > Thursday. > > Quisiera to s! ee its commentaries on this matter. > > Respect, > > Seat of AndrÃ©s > Chair of LACRALO > > > > Considered, > > I in remembering of is Holiday of the close one to Thursday of lasemana of which > of the fact has > countries of many of ours, had a Easter. Let us must of > Probably > following reprogramar of Thursday of Teleconferencing paragraph of. > > I concern of the a the one of the commentaries of his of reading of would please. > > Greetings, > > Seat of AndrÃ©s > President of LACRALO > > 2011/4/14 Marilyn Vernon <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > > Wanted All, > > the following teleconferencing of LACRALO to program for > Thursday, the 21 of April in > 21:00 > UTC > > you can control your time > local in: > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20110421T21 >> > the agenda (to be bought up to date) and the details of the participation can > to find in: > https://community.icann.org/x/s4PT > > > if you require > a d! ial-out please between in contact with personal a En-Grande in! : > > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>. > > > -- > > respect, > > Heidi Ullrich, Gisella Gruber-Blanco, Seth Greene, Marilyn > Vernon > Personal En-Grande of ICANN > > > > _______________________________________________ > list that envÃÂa > lacquer-discuss-lac-discuss-in > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-in > > > > > -- > * Seat of AndrÃ©s * > www.andrespiazza.com > _______________________________________________ > > > > > [ [ - - Original text (in) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/00ae0d7287.html > --]] > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-in mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-in > -- * Fatima Cambronero * Lawyer-Argentina President Ageia Densi http://ar.ageiadensi.org/ _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c74bd8d3d9.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] [lac-discuss-es] RECORDATORIO: Teleconferencia de LACRALO -Jueves, Del 21 UTC De Abril 21:00
by Jose Ovidio Salgueiro April 15, 2011

April 15, 2011

Yo voy a estar en la playa con mi familia ese dia JOS Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar -----Original Message----- From: andrespiazza(a)gmail.com Sender: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 00:11:59 To: <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Reply-To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] RECORDATORIO: Teleconferencia de LACRALO - Jueves, Del 21 UTC De Abril 21:00 [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Tema: Re: RECORDATORIO: Teleconferencia de LACRALO - Jueves, Del 21 UTC De Abril 21:00 De: andrespiazza(a)gmail.com (Español Abajo) Querido Todos, Alguien me recordó que el jueves próximo es días de fiesta en la mayoría de nuestros países, debido a Pascua. Necesitamos quizá cambiar la hora de nuestrateleconferencia para después Jueves. Quisiera ver sus comentarios sobre esta materia. Respeto, Plaza de Andrés Silla de LACRALO Estimados, Yo en recordar del es Feriado del próxima del EL Jueves de lasemana del que del hecho han países de muchos de nuestros, debido un la Semana Santa. Debamos de Probablemente siguiente reprogramar del EL Jueves de Teleconferencia párrafo del la. Yo respecto del al de los comentarios del sus del leer del gustaría. Saludos, Plaza de Andrés Presidente de LACRALO 2011/4/14 Marilyn Vernon <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > Querido Todos, > > la teleconferencia siguiente de LACRALO programar para jueves, el 21 de abril en > 21:00 > UTC. > > usted puede controlar su tiempo local en: > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20110421T21 > > la agenda (ser puesto al día) y los detalles de la participación se pueden encontrar en: > https://community.icann.org/x/s4PT > > > si usted requiere un dial-out por favor entre en contacto con a personal En-Grande en: > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>. > > > -- > respeto, > > Heidi Ullrich, Gisella Gruber-Blanco, Seth Greene, Marilyn Vernon > Personal En-Grande de ICANN > > > _______________________________________________ > lista que envÃa laca-discutir-lac-discuss-en > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > -- * Plaza de AndrÃ©s * www.andrespiazza.com _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/00ae0d7287.html --]]

2 1

Re: [lac-discuss-en] REMINDER: Teleconferencing of LACRALO - Thursday, the 21 UTC Of April 21:00
by salgueiro.jo＠gmail.com April 15, 2011

April 15, 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: REMINDER: Teleconferencing of LACRALO - Thursday, the 21 UTC Of April 21:00 From: salgueiro.jo(a)gmail.com I am going to be in the beach with my family that day JOS Envoy from my BlackBerry de Movistar -----Original Message From: andrespiazza(a)gmail.com Sender: lac-discuss-it is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 00:11:59 To: <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Reply-To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] REMINDER: Teleconferencing of LACRALO - Thursday, Of The 21 UTC Of April 21:00 [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]] Subject: Re: REMINDER: Teleconferencing of LACRALO - Thursday,the 21 UTC Of April 21:00 Of: andrespiazza(a)gmail.com (Spanish Down) Wanted All, Somebody remembered to me that next Thursday is holidays in most of our countries, due to Passover. Perhaps we needed to change the hour of nuestrateleconferencia for later Thursday. It wanted to see his commentaries on this matter. Respect, Seat of Andrés Chair of LACRALO Considered, I in remembering of he is Holiday of the close one to Thursdayof lasemana of which of the fact they have countries of many of ours, had a Easter. Let us must of Probably following reprogramar of Thursday of Teleconferencing paragraph of. I concern of the a the one of the commentaries of his of reading of would please. Greetings, Seat of Andrés President of LACRALO 2011/4/14 Marilyn Vernon <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > Wanted All, > > the following teleconferencing of LACRALO toprogram for Thursday, the 21 of April in > 21:00 > UTC > > you can control your local time in: > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20110421T21 >> the agenda (to be bought up to date) and the details of the participation can be found in: > https://community.icann.org/x/s4PT > > > if you please require a dial-out between in contact with personal a En-Grande in: > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>. > > > -- > respect, > > Heidi Ullrich, Gisella Gruber-Blanco, Seth Greene, Marilyn Vernon > Personal En-Grande of ICANN > > > _______________________________________________ > list that envÃÂa lacquer-discuss-lac-discuss-in > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-in > -- * Seat of AndrÃ©s * www.andrespiazza.com _______________________________________________ [ [ - - Original text (in) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/00ae0d7287.html --]] _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/a32c44212d.html --]]

1 0

REMINDER: LACRALO Teleconference -Thursday, 21 April 21:00 UTC
by Marilyn Vernon April 15, 2011

April 15, 2011

Dear All, The next LACRALO Teleconference is scheduled for Thursday, 21 April at 21:00 UTC. You may check your local time at: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20110421T21 The agenda (to be updated) and participation details can be found at: https://community.icann.org/x/s4PT If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>. -- Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Gisella Gruber-White, Seth Greene, Marilyn Vernon ICANN At-Large Staff

2 1

Result for LACRALO Secretariat Election
by Andrés Piazza April 14, 2011

April 14, 2011

Dear All, The online vote to elect the LACRALO secretariat for a one year term from April 15 2011 has concluded and the results are as follows: 26 out of 36 ALSes in LACRALO participated in this election, which is 72% of the electorate. The votes for the candidate have been tallied as per rule 12.9 of the RoP (each vote is weighted with a country coefficient), and the result for the candidate of the weighted vote is as follows: Dev Anand Teelucksingh : 64.4% You can find the spreadsheet showing the calculation of the weighted vote at https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Ao5dV8HXW3JzdDJEc2ZfUjBiZnRCOVhWUX… and/or<https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Ao5dV8HXW3JzdDJEc2ZfUjBiZnRCOVhWUX…> The BigPulse results of the votes cast by each voter can be seen at http://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=1686fqK5hS7RsQdUa3pjf47m With 64.4%, Dev Anand Teelucksingh, from the Trinidad and Tobago Computer Society has been re-elected as the LACRALO secretariat for a one year term from April 15, 2011. Kind Regards, Andrés Piazza LACRALO Chair -- *Andrés Piazza* www.andrespiazza.com

5 5

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =?windows-1252?q?Resultado_para_la_elecci=F3n_de = =?windows-1252?q?_la_secretar=EDa_de_LACRALO =
by natalia.enciso＠gmail.com April 14, 2011

April 14, 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =?windows-1252?q?Resultado_para_la_elecci=F3n_de = =?windows-1252?q?_la_secretar=EDa_de_LACRALO = From: natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com Congratulations Dev! You and Andres make to good team. Cheers, Natalia Envoy from my BlackBerry device® proveído by Tigo. -----Original Message From: admin(a)ttcsweb.org Sender: lac-discuss-it is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:17:57 To: <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Reply-To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org subject:Re: Result for the selection of the LACRALO secretariat [ [ - - Translated text (in - > is)--]] Subject: Re: Result for the selection of the LACRALO secretariat Of: admin(a)ttcsweb.org Wanted All, Desire to be thankful to him by its words good and for using it and stops its implication in the recent selection of the LACRALO secretariat. I ahead watch to work with you in east LACRALO year like there is much will be made improve the implication of the ALSes in activities of LACRALO to modify our municipal ordinances toexceed to the countries without ALSes and more. Good Respect, Revealer Anand Teelucksingh Secretariat of LACRALO 2011/4/14 Seat of Andrés <andrespiazza(a)gmail.com>: > Wanted All, > > the vote in line to choose the LACRALO secretariat paraun term of a year > of the one of April 15 of 2011 hasconcluded and the results are as it follows: > > 26 outside 36 ALSes in LACRALO participated in this selection, that is > 72% of the electorate > > the votes for the candidate has marked according to the rule 12,9 of > protective device in case of volcamiento (each votose load with a coefficient of the country), and the result > for the candidate of the loaded vote is as it follows: > > Revealing Anand Teelucksingh: 64.4% > > you can find the balance leaf showing of the calculation of the vote loaded in > https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Ao5dV8HXW3JzdDJEc2ZfUjBiZnRCOVhWUX… and/or<https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Ao5dV8HXW3JzdDJEc2ZfUjBiZnRCOVhWUX…> > > the re! sults of BigPulse of the votes threw by each voter can be considered in > http://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=1686fqK5hS7RsQdUa3pjf47m > > with 64,4%, the revealer Anand Teelucksingh, of the Trinidad yde the Trinidad and Tobago > the society of the computer has been reelected like secretarÃÂa of LACRALO stops to > tÃ©rmino of aÃÂ±o of! of April 15 of 2011, > > > Good Respect, > > Seat of AndrÃ©s > Chair of LACRALO > > -- > * Seat of AndrÃ©s * > www.andrespiazza.com > _______________________________________________> list that envÃÂa lacquer-discuss-lac-discuss-in > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-in > _______________________________________________ [ [ - - Original text (in) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d1305b6755.html --]] _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b664fffeba.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] LACRALO Secretariat Elections
by Carlton Samuels April 14, 2011

April 14, 2011

Congrats to my friend Dev. As you all know, Dev is my closest collaborator in LACRALO and his help and counsel is very important to me. He's done an excellent job to date as Secretariat and I'm pleased most of us agree. Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:57 AM, < lac-discuss-en-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> wrote: > Send lac-discuss-en mailing list submissions to > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:59:37 -0400 > From: Jacqueline Morris <jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com> > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Result for LACRALO Secretariat Election > Cc: LACRALO discussion list <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Message-ID: <BANLkTikPu=ynkre=arVW8Rv6TcR=t0PgfA(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Congrats! > > Jacqueline A. Morris > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and > Free. > (after Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> ) > > > > 2011/4/14 Andr?s Piazza <andrespiazza(a)gmail.com> > > > Dear All, > > > > The online vote to elect the LACRALO secretariat for a one year term > > from April 15 2011 has concluded and the results are as follows: > > > > 26 out of 36 ALSes in LACRALO participated in this election, which is > > 72% of the electorate. > > > > The votes for the candidate have been tallied as per rule 12.9 of the > > RoP (each vote is weighted with a country coefficient), and the result > > for the candidate of the weighted vote is as follows: > > > > Dev Anand Teelucksingh : 64.4% > > > > You can find the spreadsheet showing the calculation of the weighted vote > > at > > > > > https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Ao5dV8HXW3JzdDJEc2ZfUjBiZnRCOVhWUX… > > and/or< > > > https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0Ao5dV8HXW3JzdDJEc2ZfUjBiZnRCOVhWUX… > >

2 1

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =?utf-8?q?TEMAS_PROPUESTOS_A_VOTACI=C3=93N_EN_AL = =?utf-8?q?AC =
by presidencia＠internauta.org.ar April 14, 2011

April 14, 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =?utf-8?q?TEMAS_PROPUESTOS_A_VOTACI=C3=93N_EN_AL = =?utf-8?q?AC = From: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar Alexander: thanks for you quick answer, I believe that it had been very good thatyou find errand opportune information in the list on the subject... discards that in future you can deliver an attack by the LACRALO and us envies information and pareceres to enrich discucion on the subjects in that these involved, I believe that that can be a good iniativa of intreach and by demas shared in common. I want to take advantage of for aclararte two things, 1)esta is not the first time that envia information on voting subjects and I become it whenever my familiar labor obligations or me they allow it and 2)los times of voting in ALAC are asi... Warm greetings Sergio -- mens. original -- Subject: RE: [ lac-discuss-is ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTING IN ALAC Of: Alexander Pisanty <apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx> Date: 14/04/2011 14:22 Sergio, the voting will close when you want but if we are speaking of the same one manifesto, and to is published. The one of the DNSSEC seems to be condiionando the amplest manifesto. If outside thus, we would be throwing the boy along with the water of thebathtub. I applaud your shipment of subjects for voting. Croe that is a first good step. It follows to give to more information and more advance. And not to get tired to explain. Alexander PIsanty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr Alexander Pisanty UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 * My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com * LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Â106C0C8614 * They see ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org * It participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar wrote: > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:14:17 -0300 > From: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > To: Alexander Pisanty <apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx> > Cc: Carlos Quintana Side <cveraq(a)gmail.com>, > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: RE: [ lac-discuss-is ] SUBJECTS PROPOSED To [ UTF-8] VOTACIÃ~SN IN ALAC > > Dear Alexander, the voting closes in the day of today. Also I recommend that you read the mail that envie to the list with the subjects to voting and its dates so that you do not incur errors of times. On the other hand it wanted aclararte that subject DNSSEC, is atopico that leaves to light by a explanation that occurred in the liston my position on the subject. > warm Greetings > Sergio > -- mens. original -- > Subject: Re: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTACIÃ"n IN ALAC > Of: Alexander Pisanty <apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx> > Date: 14/04/2011 13:23 > > Carlos, > > thanks not to save an opportunity to me to follow the subject > in detail by my own means. > > No! w I have almost absolute certainty of being able to affirmthe following thing: > > the ALAC manifesto sobrela revisiÃ³n mandataada by the AoC on > stability, security and robustness of the DNS already was published by ALAC without > to have counted opportunely with the LACRALO vote. > > Cubre tens with spas and subsubjects of importance for the users, and already > estÃ as much published, as mencionÃ©, like in being able del SSR-RT or > Stability, Security, and Resilience of the DNS Review Team, along with > of the Buisness Constituency, the International to hamber ofCommerce, > Registrars, and some experts. > > That is to say, if indeed I do not have myself lost, discusiÃ³n on if DNSSEC > must be obligatory but gratuitous or to cualuqier another variant it has been > obsolecida course to the irrelevancia. > > Good, but by the meno this time somebody sÃ leypÃ³ what estÃ bamos > having to have discussed. > > Like already mencionÃ© before, I have distin! ciÂ´Â´on to preside over the SSR-RT; no > I can prejuzagar! cuÃ l serÃ the reading of the rest of the RT but without a doubt no > entrarÃ in details about quiÃ©n votÃ³ and quÃen no; simnplemente I anticipate > that is considered like posiciÃ³n of ALAC. > > Recomiendo its reading. > > Alexander Pisanty > > >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > Dr Alexander Pisanty > UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 > > * My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > * LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Â106C0C8614 > > * Sees ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org > * Participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Carlos Quintana Side wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:53:07 +0000 > > From: Carlos Quintana Side <c! veraq(a)gmail.com> > > To: Alexander Pisanty <apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx> > > Cc: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar, lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Subject: > > =?Windows-1252?B?UmU6IFtsYWMtZGlzY3Vzcy1lc10JVEVNQVMgUFJPUFVFU1RPUyBBIFZPV > > EFDSdNOIEVOIEFMQUM = = > > > > the interchange this equal few hours above, and if already I am finished the process now is necessary to turn around to the result and its consequences. > > > > Carlos > > -----Original Message > > From: Alexander Pisanty <apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx> > > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:46:59 > > To: Carlos Quintana Side<cveraq(a)gmail.com> > > Cc: <presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar>; <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTACIÃ"n E > > N ALAC > > > > Carlos, colleagues, > > > > to see if enteindo: > > > > Â we are condiconando all the vote on the SSR-RT [ that Ipreside over, for that reason! > > sÃ³lo busoc aclaraciÃ³n ] to situaciÃ³n of which! the ser vices of DNSSEC > > is onerous or gratuitous? Â and it, on a consultation that cerrÃ³ yesterday? > > > > agradecerÃ the clarity. This way, but I excuses pedirl adee > > encounter of trip in paÃs in which not all the services of Internet > > estÃ n available, which as well forces to accede of ways that > > acambio to open some obstructs all. One becomes specially > > complicated the retrospective tracking of these conversations. > > > > Alexander Pisanty > > > > > >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > Dr Alexander Pisanty > > UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > > > Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 > > > > * My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > > * LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > > * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > > * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Â106C0C8614 > > > &g! t; * Sees ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org > > * Participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org > >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Carlos Quintana Side wrote: > > > > > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:57:23 +0000 > > > From: Carlos Quintana Side <cveraq(a)gmail.com> > > > To: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > > Cc: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] [ Windows-1252 ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTACIÃ"n IN > > > ALAC > > > > > > Dear friend and colleagues: > > > > > > soon does not have but options of being IF conditional for several reasons but the main one is that > > > > > > 1. There are interests in game that with did not remainquiet. IF ademas is a business so that it moves single > > > > > > IF for the same reasons has less probability of being restricted. > &! gt; > > > > votaria I NOT and who move to IF conditio! nal by l ogica. > > > > > > Carlos > > > -----Original Message > > > From: presidency Argentina Internaut <presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar> > > > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:55:42 > > > To: <cveraq(a)gmail.com> > > > Reply-To: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > > Cc: <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-es]TEMAS PROPOSED To VOTACIÃ " > > > N IN ALAC > > > > > > Carlos I agree with vos in your glance but I believe that the vote deberÃa of > > > to be "IF" and to put some contributions in the "field observations" so that > > > can consider in the future and looking for the way thatthat cost > > > in certain cases (as vos good describÃs) is assimilated by > > > company and not by the user. > > > an affectionate greeting! > > > > > > * Sergio Saline I carry President Internauta Argentina AsociaciÃ³n > > > Argentina de Usuarios d! e Internet <http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI- > > > Latin American FederaciÃ³n of Users of Internet > > > <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook:salinasporto > > > twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... > > > Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * > > > > > > * > > > > > > "OjalÃ we pruned to be disobedient, whenever we received Ã³rdenes that > > > humiliates our conscience or violates our sense comÃºn "- Eduardo > > > Galeano- > > > > > > * > > > > > > > > > the 13/04/2011 10:35 a.m., Carlos Quintana Side escribiÃ³: > > > > Acabe buying several dominions and the recorder offers DNSSEC like option with cost. Nonmemory now the value but that me desestimulo. > > > > > > > > deberia to vow NOT because the cost is a tie for the expansion of normal users. Soon debera trrabajar a serrie of norms to return ob! ligatory in some cases DNSSEC for example command post institu! tions or companies financial, that receive payments, governmental, etc > > > > > > > > the same norm deberia to contemplate the nonobligation for example in case of redireccionamientos to dominions that already have DNSSEC > > > > > > > > Carlos Side > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message > > > > From: "Alberto Grove"<asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> > > > > Sender: lac-discuss-it is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:25:32 > > > > To:<presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar>;<lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > > > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] > > > > PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTACIÃ"n IN > > > > ALAC > > > > > > > > Sergio, reciÃ©n I am getting up myself after long time and in some > > > > things tardarÃ© in putting me to dÃa. ParecerÃa that not estÃ s so in agreement in > > &gt! ; > obligatory nature of the company/signature of DNSSEC,but in one recomendaciÃ³n of "very > > > > advisable "or of" better prÃ cticas ". It seems reasonable so that there are costs > > > > associated that single deberÃan to be assumed in certain conditions. > > > > can vote IF with that observaciÃ³n? Or for that reason deberÃa to vow no? > > > > warm Greetings > > > > > > > > Alberto Grove > > > > IIISI > > > > > > > > original -----Mensaje > > > > Of: lac-discuss-it is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > [ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org ] In name of > > > > presidency Argentina Internaut > > > > Sent: MiÃ©rcoles, 13 of April of 2011 10:05 a.m. > > > > For: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTACIÃ"n IN ALAC > > > > > &g! t; > > Considered compaÃ±eros of the LACRALO: > > &! gt; > Hay two subjects that have been sent to votaciÃ³n in ALAC: > > > > * 1) * ALAC Statement on the Stability, Security, and Resilience of the > > > > DNS Review Team (SSR-Team) - ALAC DeclaraciÃ³n on thestability, > > > > security and capacity of recuperaciÃ³n of the Equipment of RevisiÃ³n of DNS > > > > (SSR-Team) - * Overcomes dÃa 15 of April - * > > > > > > > > If it does not have nobody is against or has a different point of view that > > > > makes change my posiciÃ³n gustarÃa to vote to me by * "IF". * > > > > I must indicate nevertheless, that in reference to point 4 of the report I follow > > > > the line that exposed Cheryl with respect to DNSSEC > > > > (https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Stabilit > > > > y%2C+Security%2C+and+Resilience+of+the+DNS+Review+Team+%28SSR-Team%29?focuse > > > > dCommentId=13861602&#comme! nt-13861602) > > > > > > > > * > > > > 2) * ALAC Statement on the WHOIS Review Team's RFC onScope of Work and > > > > Roadmap, Outreach and Action for Plans WHOIS Review Exercise - April > > > > 2011- DeclaraciÃ³n of ALAC of the equipment of revisiÃ³n WHOIS RFC in Ã mbito > > > > of work and plan of work, Outreach and the plan of acciÃ³n for > > > > exercise of WHOIS Review- April 2011 - * It overcomesthe 16 of April > > > > > > > > * If it does not have nobody is against or has a different point of view that > > > > makes change my posiciÃ³n gustarÃa to vote to me by * "IF". * > > > > For that they want to read something on this can enter a: > > > > https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Whois+Rev > > > > iew+Team%27s+RFC+on+Scope+of+Work+and+Roadmap%2C+Outreach+and+Action+Plans+f > > > > or+Whois+Review+Exerc! ise+-+April+2011 > > > > > > > > Whose relat! or was o ur compaÃ±ero of THIN Carlton Samuels. > > > > > > > > Sugiero takes a reading of the document in cuestiÃ³n,since it is very > > > > rich and interesting declaraciÃ³n made. > > > > TambiÃ©n I believe that in this podrÃa to contribute to something Carlton like stops > > > > to illuminate us but on this subject to all the list and to make a species of > > > > intreach (if it is possible and it has time) > > > > > > > > to finalize, single a reference to mails sent by Jacqueline > > > > to the list on if the ALAC Members we make or not ourwork, no > > > > attempt to argue on this, but if I must at least markone > > > > posiciÃ³n on the same one, since I have assumed I have sent mayorÃa of > > > > the subjects that have been put in votaciÃ³n, and single on two ocassions no > > > > I have voted, first by to have had problems with my PC and sec! ond > > > > by to have found to me in trip, nevertheless seems that we demanded what > > > > in our times to be in ALAC we have not made... if badly no > > > > memory two members of LACRALO occupied spaces like chair and vice > > > > to chair (one was jacqueline and the other josÃ© Ovid)... quizÃ s habrÃa that > > > > to review whatever mails sent to a the list to generate participaciÃ³n > > > > and to gather what we, the ALS of Latin©rich AmÃ and the Caribbean > > > > pensÃ bamos... can be that we are with a surprise... > > > > warm Greetings > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > lac-discuss-is mailing list > > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c95f6f7f65.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =?utf-8?q?TEMAS_PROPUESTOS_A_VOTACI=C3=93N_EN_AL = =?utf-8?q?AC =
by apisan＠servidor.unam.mx April 14, 2011

April 14, 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =?utf-8?q?TEMAS_PROPUESTOS_A_VOTACI=C3=93N_EN_AL = =?utf-8?q?AC = From: apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx Sergio, the voting will close when you want but if we are speaking of the same one manifesto, and to is published. The one of the DNSSEC seems to be condiionando the amplest manifesto. If outside thus, we would be throwing the boy along with the water of the bathtub. I applaud your shipment of subjects for voting. Croe that is a first good step. It follows to give to more information and more advance. And not to get tired to explain. Alexander PIsanty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr Alexander Pisanty UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 * My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com * LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Â106C0C8614 * They see ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org * It participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar wrote: > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:14:17 -0300 > From: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > To: Alexander Pisanty <apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx> > Cc: Carlos Quintana Side <cveraq(a)gmail.com>, > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: RE: [ lac-discuss-is ] SUBJECTS PROPOSED To [ UTF-8] VOTACIÃ~SN IN ALAC > > Dear Alexander, the voting closes in the day of today. Also I recommend that you read the mail that envie to the list with the subjects to voting and its dates so that you do not incur errors of times. On the other hand it wanted aclararte that subject DNSSEC, is atopico that leaves to light by a explanation that occurred in the liston my position on the subject. > warm Greetings > Sergio > -- mens. original -- > Subject: Re: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTACIÃ"n IN ALAC > Of: Alexander Pisanty <apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx> > Date: 14/04/2011 13:23 > > Carlos, > > thanks not to save an opportunity to me to follow the subject > in detail by my own means. > > Now! I have almost absolute certainty of being able to affirmthe following thing: > > the ALAC manifesto sobrela revisiÃÂ³n mandataada by the AoC on > stability, security and robustness of the DNS already was published by ALAC without > to have counted opportunely with the LACRALO vote. > > Cubre tens with spas and subsubjects of importance for the users, and already > estÃ as much published, as mencionÃ©, like in being able del SSR-RT or > Stability, Security, and Resilience of the DNS Review Team, along with > of the Buisness Constituency, the International to hamber ofCommerce, > Registrars, and some experts. > > That is to say, if indeed I do not have myself lost, discusiÃÂ³n on if DNSSEC > must be obligatory but gratuitous or to cualuqier another variant it has been > obsolecida course to the irrelevancia. > > Good, but by the meno this time somebody sÃÂ leypÃÂ³ what estÃ bamos > having to have discussed. > > Like already mencionÃ© before, I have distinc! iÃÂŽÃÂŽon to preside over the SSR-RT; no > I can prejuzagar ! cuÃ l s erÃ the reading of the rest of the RT but without a doubt no > entrarÃ in details about quiÃ©n votÃÂ³ and quÃÂen no; simnplemente I anticipate > that is considered like posiciÃÂ³n of ALAC. > > Recomiendo its reading. > > Alexander Pisanty > > >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > Dr Alexander Pisanty > UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 > > * My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > * LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Ã106C0C8614 > > * Sees ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org > * Participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Carlos Quintana Side wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:53:07 +0000 > > From: Carlos Quintana Side <cv! eraq(a)gmail.com> > > To: Alexander Pisanty <apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx> > > Cc: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar, lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Subject: > > =?Windows-1252?B?UmU6IFtsYWMtZGlzY3Vzcy1lc10JVEVNQVMgUFJPUFVFU1RPUyBBIFZPV > > EFDSdNOIEVOIEFMQUM = = > > > > the interchange this equal few hours above, and if already I am finished the process now is necessary to turn around to the result and its consequences. > > > > Carlos > > -----Original Message > > From: Alexander Pisanty <apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx> > > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:46:59 > > To: Carlos Quintana Side<cveraq(a)gmail.com> > > Cc: <presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar>; <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTACIÃ"n E > > N ALAC > > > > Carlos, colleagues, > > > > to see if enteindo: > > > > Ã we are condiconando all the vote on the SSR-RT [ that Ipreside over, for that reason ! > > sÃÂ³lo busoc aclaraciÃÂ³n ] to situaciÃÂ³n of which ! the serv ices of DNSSEC > > is onerous or gratuitous? Ã and it, on a consultation that cerrÃÂ³ yesterday? > > > > agradecerÃ the clarity. This way, but I excuses pedirl adee > > encounter of trip in paÃÂs in which not all the services of Internet > > estÃ n available, which as well forces to accede of ways that > > acambio to open some obstructs all. One becomes specially > > complicated the retrospective tracking of these conversations. > > > > Alexander Pisanty > > > > > >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > Dr Alexander Pisanty > > UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > > > Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 > > > > * My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > > * LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > > * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > > * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Ã106C0C8614 > > > &gt! ; * Sees ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org > > * Participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org > >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Carlos Quintana Side wrote: > > > > > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:57:23 +0000 > > > From: Carlos Quintana Side <cveraq(a)gmail.com> > > > To: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > > Cc: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] [ Windows-1252 ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTACIÃ"n IN > > > ALAC > > > > > > Dear friend and colleagues: > > > > > > soon does not have but options of being IF conditional for several reasons but the main one is that > > > > > > 1. There are interests in game that with did not remainquiet. IF ademas is a business so that it moves single > > > > > > IF for the same reasons has less probability of being restricted. > &g! t; > > > > votaria I NOT and who move to IF condition! al by lo gica. > > > > > > Carlos > > > -----Original Message > > > From: presidency Argentina Internaut <presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar> > > > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:55:42 > > > To: <cveraq(a)gmail.com> > > > Reply-To: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > > Cc: <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-es]TEMAS PROPOSED To VOTACIÃ " > > > N IN ALAC > > > > > > Carlos I agree with vos in your glance but I believe that the vote deberÃÂa of > > > to be "IF" and to put some contributions in the "field observations" so that > > > can consider in the future and looking for the way thatthat cost > > > in certain cases (as vos good describÃÂs) is assimilated by > > > company and not by the user. > > > an affectionate greeting! > > > > > > * Sergio Saline I carry President Internauta Argentina AsociaciÃÂ³n > > > Argentina de Usuarios de! Internet <http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI- > > > Latin American FederaciÃÂ³n of Users of Internet > > > <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook:salinasporto > > > twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... > > > Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * > > > > > > * > > > > > > "OjalÃ we pruned to be disobedient, whenever we received ÃÂ³rdenes that > > > humiliates our conscience or violates our sense comÃÂºn "- Eduardo > > > Galeano- > > > > > > * > > > > > > > > > the 13/04/2011 10:35 a.m., Carlos Quintana Side escribiÃÂ³: > > > > Acabe buying several dominions and the recorder offers DNSSEC like option with cost. Nonmemory now the value but that me desestimulo. > > > > > > > > deberia to vow NOT because the cost is a tie for the expansion of normal users. Soon debera trrabajar a serrie of norms to return obl! igatory in some cases DNSSEC for example command post institut! ions or companies financial, that receive payments, governmental, etc > > > > > > > > the same norm deberia to contemplate the nonobligation for example in case of redireccionamientos to dominions that already have DNSSEC > > > > > > > > Carlos Side > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message > > > > From: "Alberto Grove"<asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> > > > > Sender: lac-discuss-it is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:25:32 > > > > To:<presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar>;<lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > > > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] > > > > PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTACIÃ"n IN > > > > ALAC > > > > > > > > Sergio, reciÃ©n I am getting up myself after long time and in some > > > > things tardarÃ© in putting me to dÃÂa. ParecerÃÂa that not estÃ s so in agreement in > > >! > obligatory nature of the company/signature of DNSSEC,but in one recomendaciÃÂ³n of "very > > > > advisable "or of" better prÃ cticas ". It seems reasonable so that there are costs > > > > associated that single deberÃÂan to be assumed in certain conditions. > > > > can vote IF with that observaciÃÂ³n? Or for that reason deberÃÂa to vow no? > > > > warm Greetings > > > > > > > > Alberto Grove > > > > IIISI > > > > > > > > original -----Mensaje > > > > Of: lac-discuss-it is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > [ mailto:lac-discuss-is -bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org ] In name of > > > > presidency Argentina Internaut > > > > Sent: MiÃ©rcoles, 13 of April of 2011 10:05 a.m. > > > > For: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTACIÃ"n IN ALAC > > > > > &gt! ; > > Considered compaÃÂ±eros of the LACRALO: > > &g! t; > Hay two subjects that have been sent to votaciÃÂ³n in ALAC: > > > > * 1) * ALAC Statement on the Stability, Security, and Resilience of the > > > > DNS Review Team (SSR-Team) - ALAC DeclaraciÃÂ³n on thestability, > > > > security and capacity of recuperaciÃÂ³n of the Equipment of RevisiÃÂ³n of DNS > > > > (SSR-Team) - * Overcomes dÃÂa 15 of April - * > > > > > > > > If it does not have nobody is against or has a different point of view that > > > > makes change my posiciÃÂ³n gustarÃÂa to vote to me by * "IF". * > > > > I must indicate nevertheless, that in reference to point 4 of the report I follow > > > > the line that exposed Cheryl with respect to DNSSEC > > > > (https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Stabilit > > > > y%2C+Security%2C+and+Resilience+of+the+DNS+Review+Team+%28SSR-Team%29?focuse > > > > dCommentId=13861602&#commen! t-13861602) > > > > > > > > * > > > > 2) * ALAC Statement on the WHOIS Review Team's RFC onScope of Work and > > > > Roadmap, Outreach and Action for Plans WHOIS Review Exercise - April > > > > 2011- DeclaraciÃÂ³n of ALAC of the equipment of revisiÃÂ³n WHOIS RFC in Ã mbito > > > > of work and plan of work, Outreach and the plan of acciÃÂ³n for > > > > exercise of WHOIS Review- April 2011 - * It overcomesthe 16 of April > > > > > > > > * If it does not have nobody is against or has a different point of view that > > > > makes change my posiciÃÂ³n gustarÃÂa to vote to me by * "IF". * > > > > For that they want to read something on this can enter a: > > > > https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Whois+Rev > > > > iew+Team%27s+RFC+on+Scope+of+Work+and+Roadmap%2C+Outreach+and+Action+Plans+f > > > > or+Whois+Review+Exerci! se+-+April+2011 > > > > > > > > Whose relato! r was ou r compaÃÂ±ero of THIN Carlton Samuels. > > > > > > > > Sugiero takes a reading of the document in cuestiÃÂ³n,since it is very > > > > rich and interesting declaraciÃÂ³n made. > > > > TambiÃ©n I believe that in this podrÃÂa to contribute to something Carlton like stops > > > > to illuminate us but on this subject to all the list and to make a species of > > > > intreach (if it is possible and it has time) > > > > > > > > to finalize, single a reference to mails sent by Jacqueline > > > > to the list on if the ALAC Members we make or not ourwork, no > > > > attempt to argue on this, but if I must at least markone > > > > posiciÃÂ³n on the same one, since I have assumed I have sent mayorÃÂa of > > > > the subjects that have been put in votaciÃÂ³n, and single on two ocassions no > > > > I have voted, first by to have had problems with my PC and seco! nd > > > > by to have found to me in trip, nevertheless seems that we demanded what > > > > in our times to be in ALAC we have not made... if badly no > > > > memory two members of LACRALO occupied spaces like chair and vice > > > > to chair (one was jacqueline and the other josÃ© Ovid)... quizÃ s habrÃÂa that > > > > to review whatever mails sent to a the list to generate participaciÃÂ³n > > > > and to gather what we, the ALS of Latin©rich AmÃ and the Caribbean > > > > pensÃ bamos... can be that we are with a surprise... > > > > warm Greetings > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > lac-discuss-is mailing list > > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0ebe9fe807.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =?utf-8?q?TEMAS_PROPUESTOS_A_VOTACI=C3=93N_EN_AL = =?utf-8?q?AC =
by presidencia＠internauta.org.ar April 14, 2011

April 14, 2011

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =?utf-8?q?TEMAS_PROPUESTOS_A_VOTACI=C3=93N_EN_AL = =?utf-8?q?AC = From: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar Dear Alexander, the voting closes in the day of today. Also I recommend that you read the mail that envie to the list with the subjects to voting and its dates so that you do not incur errors of times. On the other hand it wanted aclararte that subject DNSSEC, is atopico that leaves to light by a explanation that occurred in the liston my position on the subject. Warm greetings Sergio -- mens. original -- Subject: Re: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTINGIN ALAC Of: Alexander Pisanty <apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx> Date: 14/04/2011 13:23 Carlos, thanks not to save an opportunity to me to follow the subject in detail by my own means. Now I have almost absolute certainty of being able to affirm the following thing: The ALAC manifesto sobrela overhaul mandataada by the AoC on stability, security and robustness of the DNS already were published by ALAC without to have counted opportunely with the LACRALO vote. It covers tens with spas and subsubjects of importance for the users, and already as much it is published, as I mentioned it, like in being abledel SSR-RT or Stability, Security, and Resilience of the DNS Review Team, along with of the Buisness Constituency, the International to hamber of Commerce, Registrars, and some experts. That is to say, if indeed I do not have myself lost, the discussion onif DNSSEC it must be obligatory but gratuitous or to cualuqier another variant it has been obsolecida course to the irrelevancia. Good, but by the meno this time somebody yes leypó what we were having to have discussed. As I already mentioned it before, I have distinci´´on to preside over the SSR-RT; no I can prejuzagar which will be the reading of the rest of the RT but without a doubt no it will enter details about whom it voted and quíen no; simnplemente I anticipate that it is considered like the ALAC position. I recommend its reading. Alexander Pisanty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr Alexander Pisanty UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 * My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com * LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Â106C0C8614 * They see ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org * It participates in ICANN, http://www.icann.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Carlos Quintana Side wrote: > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:53:07 +0000 > From: Carlos Quintana Side <cveraq(a)gmail.com> > To: Alexander Pisanty <apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx> > Cc: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar, lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Subject: > =?Windows-1252?B?UmU6IFtsYWMtZGlzY3Vzcy1lc10JVEVNQVMgUFJPUFVFU1RPUyBBIFZPV > EFDSdNOIEVOIEFMQUM = = > > the interchange this equal few hours above, and if already Iam finished the process now is necessary to turn around to the result and its consequences. > > Carlos > -----Original Message > From: Alexander Pisanty <apisan(a)servidor.unam.mx> > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:46:59 > To: Carlos Quintana Side<cveraq(a)gmail.com> > Cc: <presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar>; <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTING E > N ALAC > > Carlos, colleagues, > > to see if enteindo: > > we are condiconando all the vote on the SSR-RT [ that I preside over, for that reason > only busoc the explanation ] to the situati! on of which the services of DNSSEC > is onerous or gratuitous? and it, on a consultation that closed yesterday? > > will thank for the clarity. This way, but I excuses pedirl adee > encounter of trip in a country in which not all the servicesof Internet > is available, which as well forces to accede of ways that > acambio to open some obstructs all. One becomes specially > complicated the retrospective tracking of these conversations. > > Alexander Pisanty > > >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > Dr Alexander Pisanty > UNAM, Av. University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > Tels. +52-(1)-55-5105-6044, +52-(1)-55-5418-3732 > > * My blog/My blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > * LinkedIn procases out: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > * Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > * Unete to group UNAM in LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/Â106C0C8614 > > * Sees ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org.mx, ISOC http://www.isoc.org > * Participates in ICANN, ht! tp://www.icann.org >. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ! . . . . . > > > On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Carlos Quintana Side wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:57:23 +0000 > > From: Carlos Quintana Side <cveraq(a)gmail.com> > > To: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > Cc: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] [ Windows-1252 ] PROPOSEDSUBJECTS To VOTING IN > > ALAC > > > > Dear friend and colleagues: > > > > soon does not have but options of being IF conditional for several reasons but the main one is that > > > > 1. There are interests in game that with did not remain quiet. IF ademas is a business so that it moves single > > > > IF for the same reasons has less probability of being restricted. > > > > votaria I NOT and who move to IF conditional by logica. > > > > Carlos > > -----Original Message > > From: presidency Argentina Internaut <presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar> > > Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:55:42 > > To: <cveraq(a)gmail.com> > > Reply-T! o: to presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar > > Cc: <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-es]TEMAS PROPOSED To VOTACIÓ > > N IN ALAC > > > > Carlos I agree with vos in your glance but I believe thatthe vote would have of > > to be "IF" and to put some contributions in the "field observations" so that > > can consider in the future and looking for the way that that cost > > in certain cases (as vos good you describe them) is assimilated by > > company and not by the user. > > an affectionate greeting! > > > > * Sergio Saline I carry President Internauta Argentina Association > > Argentina de Usuarios de Internet <http://www.internauta.org.ar>FLUI- > > Latin American Federation of Users of Internet > > <http://www.fuilain.org>LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook:salinasporto > > twitter:sergiosalinas MSN/MSN YAHOO/Talk: salinasporto... > > Skype:internautaargentina Mobi:+54 9 223 5 215819 * > > > > ! * > > > > "Hopefully we pruned to be disobedient, whenev! er we re ceived orders that > > humiliates our conscience or violates our common sense "-Eduardo > > Galeano- > > > > * > > > > > > the 13/04/2011 10:35 a.m., Carlos Quintana Side wrote: > > > Acabe buying several dominions and the recorder offers DNSSEC like option with cost. Nonmemory now the value but that me desestimulo. > > > > > > deberia to vow NOT because the cost is a tie for the expansion of normal users. Soon debera trrabajar a serrie of norms to return obligatory in some cases DNSSEC for example command post institutions or companies financial, that receive payments, governmental, etc > > > > > > the same norm deberia to contemplate the nonobligation for example in case of redireccionamientos to dominions that already have DNSSEC > > > > > > Carlos Side > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message > > > From: "Alberto Grove"<asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> > > > Sender: lac-discuss-it is -b! ounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:25:32 > > > To:<presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar>;<lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > > Subject: Re: [ lac-discuss-is ] > > > PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTING IN > > > ALAC > > > > > > Sergio, just I am getting up myself after long time andin some > > > things I will take in putting me to the day. It would seem that you do not agree so in > > > obligatory nature of the company/signature of DNSSEC, but in a recommendation of "very > > > advisable "or of" better practices ". It seems reasonable so that there are costs > > > associated that single would have to be assumed in certain conditions. > > > can vote IF with that observation? Or for that reason it would have to vow no? > > > warm Greetings > > > > > > Alberto Grove > > > IIISI > > > > > > original -----Mensaje > > > Of: lac-discuss-it is -boun! ces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > [ mailto:lac-discuss-i! s -bounc es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org ] In name of > > > presidency Argentina Internaut > > > Sent: Wednesday, 13 of April of 2011 10:05 a.m. > > > For: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > Subject: [ lac-discuss-is ] PROPOSED SUBJECTS To VOTINGIN ALAC > > > > > > Dear companions of the LACRALO: > > > Hay two subjects that have been sent to voting in ALAC: > > > * 1) * ALAC Statement on the Stability, Security, and Resilienceof the > > > DNS Review Team (SSR-Team) - ALAC Declaration on the stability, > > > security and capacity of recovery of the Equipment of Overhaul of DNS > > > (SSR-Team) - * Overcomes day 15 of April - * > > > > > > If it does not have nobody is against or has a different point of view that > > > I make change my position would like to vote by * "IF".* > > > I must indicate nevertheless, that in reference to point 4 of the report I follow > > > the line that expo! sed Cheryl with respect to DNSSEC > > > (https://community.icann.org/display/alacdocs/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Stabilit > > > y%2C+Security%2C+and+Resilience+of+the+DNS+Review+Team+%28SSR-Team%29?focuse > > > dCommentId=13861602&#comment-13861602) > > > > > > * > > > 2) * ALAC Statement on the WHOIS Review Team's RFC on Scope of Work and > > > Roadmap, Outreach and Action for Plans WHOIS Review Exercise - April > > > 2011- Declaration of ALAC of the equipment of overhaul WHOIS RFC in the scope > > > of work and plan of work, Outreach and the plan of action for > > > exercise of WHOIS Review- April 2011 - * It overcomes the 16 of April > > > > > > * If it does not have nobody is against or has a different point of view that > > > I make change my position would like to vote by * "IF".* > > > For that they want to read something on this can enter a: > > > https://community.icann.org/display! /alacdocs/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Whois+Rev > > > iew+Team! %27s+RFC +on+Scope+of+Work+and+Roadmap%2C+Outreach+and+Action+Plans+f > > > or+Whois+Review+Exercise+-+April+2011 > > > > > > Whose relator was our companion of THIN Carlton Samuels. > > > > > > Sugiero takes a reading of the document at issue, sinceit is very > > > rich and interesting the made declaration. > > > Also I believe that in this it could contribute to something Carlton like stops > > > to illuminate us but on this subject to all the list and to make a species of > > > intreach (if it is possible and it has time) > > > > > > to finalize, single a reference to mails sent by Jacqueline > > > to the list on if the ALAC Members we make or not our work, no > > > attempt to argue on this, but if I must at least mark one > > > position on the same one, since I have assumed I have sent most of > > > the subjects that have been put in voting, and single on two ocassions no > > > I have ! voted, first by to have had problems with my PC and second > > > by to have found to me in trip, nevertheless seems thatwe demanded what > > > in our times to be in ALAC we have not made... if badlyno > > > memory two members of LACRALO occupied spaces like chair and vice > > > to chair (one was jacqueline and other Jose Ovid)... perhaps he would have > > > to review whatever mails sent to a the list to generateparticipation > > > and to gather what we, the ALS of Latin America and theCaribbean > > > we thought... can be that we are with a surprise... > > > warm Greetings > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-is mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-is > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/109a307d77.html --]]

1 0