April 2012 - lac-discuss-en

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Iso-8859-1? Q? RES = 3A__Periodo_de_votaci = F3n = 3A_? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Declaration F3n_de_ALAC_sobre_el_informe_de_Falsas_renovacio =? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Tions? =
by presidencia＠internauta.org.ar April 16, 2012

April 16, 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? RES = 3A__Periodo_de_votaci = F3n = 3A_? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Declaration F3n_de_ALAC_sobre_el_informe_de_Falsas_renovacio =? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Tions? = From: presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar Vanda Thanks for your feedback!! Hug * Sergio Salinas Porto Internauta Argentina Association President Argentina Internet Users <http://www.internauta.org.ar> FLUI- Latin American Federation of Internet Users <http://www.fuilain.org> ICANN / LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook: salinasporto twitter: sergiosalinas MSN / YAHOO MSN / Talk: salinasporto ... Skype: internautaargentina Mobi: +54 215 819 9223 5 * * "Ojalpodamos be disobedient, every time we receive orders that humiliate our conscience or violate our common sense "-Edward Galeano * On 16/04/2012 2:44 pm, Vanda UOL escribitbNL> > Ola. Yo pienso que es relevante apoyar iniciativas que de alguna forma > protejan los usuarios - > Alternativa 1 - me parece que oír los interesados para no crear mas daño es > prudente, pero al final algo de concreto deberá entrar en el RAA > Alternativa 2 - PDP - es el camino, pero longo > Alternativa 3 - no es el mejor camino a seguir, pero vale la tentativa > Alternativa 4 - esto es necesario pero no es suficiente. > Alternativa 5 - solamente US no es suficiente. Pero como la mayoría de los > registars están ajá puede contribuir para una mejoría. > Alternativa 6 - es el camino, pero mucho largo. > Alternativa 7 - esto no existe, nada hacer con algo relevante por cierto no > es recomendable. > Abrazos a todos > -----Mensagem original----- > De: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > [mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome de > presidencia Internauta Argentina > Enviada em: segunda-feira, 16 de abril de 2012 11:32 > Para: LACRALO Español > Assunto: [lac-discuss-es] Periodo de votación: Declaración de ALAC sobre el > informe de Falsas renovaciones > > Estimados compañeros: > En el día de ayer se envío las credenciales con fecha de vencimiento el > 19 de Abril de 2012 a las 23.59 UTC. > Los Alac Mermber como es de costumbre votaremos ese mismo día a las 20 UTC. > El tema a debatir como bien dice el asunto es, las falsas renovaciones de > dominios. > Esto se trata de notificaciones falsas de renovación a partir de > correspondencia engañosa enviada al registrants por indfdividuos u > organizaciones, que dicen ser los verdaderos registrantes del mismo. > Es de suma importancia que la región tenga un debate sobre esto que afecta > indudablemente a los usuarios finales de Internet de nuestros países. > Algunos links que pueden llegar a tener una relevante importancia para el > tratamiento del tema son: > *Public Comment:* > http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/fake-renewal-notices-report-21ma > r12-en.htm > *ALAC:* > https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Fake > +Renewal+Notices+Report+Workspace > Espero comentarios y aportes de ustedes > Saludos Cordiales > > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4222c044e0.html --]]

1 0

=? Iso-8859-1? Q? RES = 3A__Periodo_de_votaci = F3n = 3A_? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Declaration F3n_de_ALAC_sobre_el_informe_de_Falsas_re =? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Innovations? =
by vanda＠uol.com.br April 16, 2012

April 16, 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? RES = 3A__Periodo_de_votaci = F3n = 3A_? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Declaration F3n_de_ALAC_sobre_el_informe_de_Falsas_re =? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Innovations? = From: vanda(a)uol.com.br Ola. I think it is important to support initiatives that somehow protect users - Alternative 1 - I think those interested or not to create more harm is prudent, but eventually something concrete in the RAA deberentrar Alternative 2 - PDP - is the way, but longo Alternative 3 - not the best way forward, but worth the effort Alternative 4 - this is necessary but not sufficient. Alternative 5 - only U.S. not enough. But as most of the ESTN registars ajpuede contribute to an improvement. Alternative 6 - is the way, but much longer. Alternative 7 - does not exist, nothing to do with anything relevant is certainly not is recommended. Hugs to all ----- Mensagem Original ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome Argentina presidency Internauta Posted in: second-feira, 16 April 2012 11:32 To: LACRALO Espaol Assunto: [lac-discuss-en] votacin Period: Declaration of ALAC on False report of renovations Dear companions, On the day of yesterday Envo credentials with an expiry date of April 19th, 2012 at 23.59 UTC. The Alac Mermber as usual will vote that same day the 20 UTC. The topic of discussion as it says the matter is, false renewals domains. This is false notifications from renovacina misleading correspondence sent to registrants by indfdividuos or organizations that claim to be the true registrants of the same. It is critical that the region has a discussion about this that affects undoubtedly to Internet end users of our passes. Some links can have a relevant importance for the treatment of the subject are: * Public Comment: * http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/fake-renewal-notices-report-21ma r12-en.htm * ALAC * https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Fake Renewal Notices + + + + Workspace Report I hope you comment and input Best Regards - * President Sergio Salinas Porto Internauta Argentina Argentina Association of Internet Users <http://www.internauta.org.ar> FLUI- Latin American Federation of Internet Users <http://www.fuilain.org> ICANN / LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook: salinasporto twitter: sergiosalinas MSN / YAHOO MSN / Talk: salinasporto ... Skype: internautaargentina Mobi: +54 215 819 9223 5 * * "Ojalpodamos be disobedient, every time we receive orders that humiliate our conscience or violate our common sense "-Edward Galeano * _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6e633beadb.html --]]

1 0

=? Iso-8859-1? Q? Periodo_de_votaci = F3n = 3A_Declarac? == Iso-8859-1? Q? I = F3n_de_ALAC_sobre_el_informe_de_Falsas_renovaciones? =
by presidencia＠internauta.org.ar April 16, 2012

April 16, 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Periodo_de_votaci = F3n = 3A_Declarac? == Iso-8859-1? Q? I = F3n_de_ALAC_sobre_el_informe_de_Falsas_renovaciones? = From: presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar Dear companions, On the day of yesterday Envo credentials with an expiry date of April 19th, 2012 at 23.59 UTC. The Alac Mermber as usual will vote that same day the 20 UTC. The topic of discussion as it says the matter is, false renewals domains. This is false notifications from renovacina misleading correspondence sent to registrants by indfdividuos or organizations that claim to be the true registrants of the same. It is critical that the region has a discussion about this that undoubtedly affects the Internet end users of our passes. Some links can have a significant importance for treatment of the subject are: * Public Comment: * http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/fake-renewal-notices-report-21m… * ALAC * https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/ALAC+Statement+on+the+Fak… I hope you comment and input Best Regards - * Sergio Salinas Porto Internauta Argentina Association President Argentina Internet Users <http://www.internauta.org.ar> FLUI- Latin American Federation of Internet Users <http://www.fuilain.org> ICANN / LACRALO - ALAC Member facebook: salinasporto twitter: sergiosalinas MSN / YAHOO MSN / Talk: salinasporto ... Skype: internautaargentina Mobi: +54 215 819 9223 5 * * "Ojalpodamos be disobedient, every time we receive orders that humiliate our conscience or violate our common sense "-Edward Galeano * _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/986c40116f.html --]]

1 0

www2012 and GlobalINET2012
by freddylinares＠gmail.com April 16, 2012

April 16, 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: www2012 and GlobalINET2012 From: freddylinares(a)gmail.com Dear, I share these two links that I hope will be of interest. Can be participate remotely. http://www2012.wwwconference.org/ http://www.internetsociety.org/events/inet-conferences/global-inet-2012 If any estarpor all, contacted outside list. Regards, ------- Freddy Linares Torres Tel + 51 997378646 Lima | San Francisco Tel +1 (415) 237-3339 twitter: @ freddylinares | www.freddylinares.com * Digital will http://blogs.gestion.pe/viadigital/ _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4d5195282c.html --]]

1 0

Comments on the draft working group SSR
by sylvia＠internautabrasil.org April 15, 2012

April 15, 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Comments on the draft working group SSR From: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org Dear companions, in Annex I Envo the result of work done by a working group in Spanish http://groups.google.com/group/lacralo-dns?hl=pt-BR product of the integration we got in our face to face Costa Rica. We work on the draft paper presented at the Costa Rica Security Working Group, stability and robustness of the DNS. Without more, Sylvia Descrio: Assinatura_Sylvia_Internautabrasil [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d4fdcaaeba.html --]]

1 0

=? Iso-8859-1? Q? Comentario_P = FAblico_de_AGEIA_DEN? == Iso-8859-1? Q? SI_sobre_SSR_RT_Draft_Report? =
by fatimacambronero＠gmail.com April 15, 2012

April 15, 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Comentario_P = FAblico_de_AGEIA_DEN? == Iso-8859-1? Q? SI_sobre_SSR_RT_Draft_Report? = From: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com (English Below) * RT SSR Draft Report Comments Pblicos *** * These comments are made pblicos in our individual capacity on behalf of Juan Manuel Rojas, JosFrancisco Arce, Javier Pallero and Fátima Cambronero of the chapters of AGEIA DENSI Argentina and Colombia. * ** First, we congratulate the team Reviewer Security Stability and Resilience for the tremendous effort made and the large work and special thanks to the Chair, Alexander Pisanty, a member of our region from Latin America and the Caribbean. We would like place special emphasis on the orderly presentation and especfica by subject because that facilitque a topic with high level of complexity was easily understood by the community, to be expressed with an order lgico and structured, and concatenated each of the recommendations. We support all the recommendations made, and although there is much room to enlarge, left seated in this, some comments individuals. We consider it important that this party has addressed the RT misintcnica limited scope of ICANN. We believe it is necessary develop a unique document with clear terminology, where it may be definiciny established scope of SSR as an objective main within the framework of work on the SSR Plan for FY12, Declaration incorporating the responsibility of SSR as it was given by the review team. At the same time, we agreed to be be clear relationships with ICANN groups and modems relations with the RSSAC SSAC, so the recommendations are supported from 1 to 6, since the only way to make procedures transparent and can be best contribution is defined, as the Recommendation to 3, clearly the nature of relationships. Thus, ICANN will reach a greater number of involved within the Internet ecosystem.Especially as members of a regional organization of Internet users, we suggest having particular regard to those who do not participate in ICANN. We agree with the need to set as soon as possible SSR Plan vinculacin As with other communities inside and outside of ICANN and the development of an efficient mechanism working retroalimentacin SSR. We share the statement with respect to publish information on DNS threats and strategies mitigacin. It will be important that there is to know the effectiveness or otherwise of the plan current security ICANN has to meet and threats desafos actual and potential, and what are the short-and long-term to face future threats desafos and security, stability and resilience of the DNS, in accordance with the Limited misintcnica ICANN ascomo control the power to maintain the stability of the DNS but with the limits that this entails. We stress the need for the Plan reflects the ICANN Estratgico commitment to the goal and mission of ICANN to "preserve and enhance operational stability, reliability, security and interoperability Global Internet. " It is important also that the SSR-RT does not focus exclusively on fsicas issues because as we know, there are also other threats may affect the stability and security of DNS. This should be framed in a process of continuous improvement not only to do with SSR but with the entire organization. We agree with the comment Ayesha Hassan when he says that the team of revision may examine how best practices are incluirn in contracts as mentioned in the Recommendation to 12. We stress the Recommendation to 23 in the need to equip Working Groups and Advisory Comits, resources and certain freedoms for to develop high quality findings. To this should RT plan of quforma believe that ICANN can not guarantee this kind of job. We agree with the comment from Mikey O'Connor audience about the need to sharpen the meaning of "under gestin of risk" document, and ALAC's comment regarding the need for ICANN creaciny accelerate the publication of a formal framework and comprehensive DNS Administration risk. Importantly, the target to be focused on long-term risks, do not forget to pay atencina short-term risks. The design of the framework must be done in layers and from a mltiple perspective to measure and manage the DNS level. This framework should support the analysis of risks, likelihood and impact of changes in the DNS infrastructure ascomo also the change in creation of POLICIES. And we support the Recommendation to 28 to the end that ICANN continue comprometindose in prevencin planificaciny incident, giving difusiny educacin, involving all areas concerned to preserve the model of multiple stakeholders, processes below upwards, allowing also the end user participation specialized. The report refers to the absence of a comprehensive framework for Risk gestin DNS. So are we to make of qumanera can create this formal framework acting the SSAC, DSSA, Group Risk Gestin work of the Board, CSO and with the participation of specialized stakeholders. * Juan Manuel Rojas - JosFrancisco Maple - Javier Pallero - Fatima Cambronero - AGEIA DENSI chapters Argentina and Colombia. *** ------ * RT SSR Draft Report Public Comments * * These public comments are made on our personal capacity on Behalf of Juan Manuel Rojas, Jose Francisco Arce, Javier Pallero and Fatima Cambronero of Argentina and Colombia AGEIA DENSI Chapters. * First, we want to Congratulate the Security, Stability and Resilience Review Team for Their Enormous effort and we want to give a special acknowledgment to the RT Chair, Alexander Pisanty, a member of our region. We would like to make special emphasis on the ordered and subject-specific That presentation provided an issue for high level of With A complexity to Easily Understood be the community by, by Being Presented in a logical, structured, and concatenated regarding Manner Each one of the recommendations. We support all of the recommendations That Were made, and although there is not very much to add, we would like to state some comments in particular. We believe it is Important That the RT started Addressing the ICANN's limited technical mission.We believe it is NECESSARY to Develop a single document, With A clear terminology, where 'the definition and scope of SSR can be ESTABLISHED, as one of the main Objectives Within the framework on the SSR Plan for FY12, Incorporating the statement of responsibility for SSR as It Was Proposed by the RT. At the Same time, we agree That the Relationships Between ICANN and other groups Should Be clear, as well as Relationships among the RSSAC and SSAC, so in Consequence, we support recommendations 1 to 6, since the only way for the Routines to be be transparent and Contributions Properly Issued, is by Providing a clear definition on the nature of Relationships, as the Recommendation 3 has Expressed. Malthus, ICANN will reach for a number of stakeholders within The Greater the Internet ecosystem. Specially We, as members of a regional organization of Internet users, particularly HAVING Suggest Regard to Those who do not Participate in ICANN. We agree on the need to Have a defined plan as soon as possible in terms of SSR linkage to other Communities Within and outside of ICANN and the Development of an efficient feedback on SSR Mechanism work.We share the statement on posting Information about DNS Threats and Mitigation Strategies for them. It would be Important to publicize the Effectiveness of the current That plan has security ICANN Established or Potential to face current Challenges and Threats, and what are the short-and long-term Objectives to meet future Challenges and Threats to security, Stability and resilience of DNS, Consistent With The limited technical mission of ICANN, and to monitoring the power to Maintain Stability of the DNS With The limits due That this entails. We stress the need for the ICANN Strategic Plan to Reflect the Commitment to STI Stated goal and mission as to "preserve and Enhance the Operational Stability, reliability, security and interoperability of the overall Internet ". TambiÃ©n It Important That the SSR-RT does not focus exclusively on Given That physical issues, as we know, there are other Threats That can Affect the Stability and security of DNS. This Should Be framed in a process of continuous improvement, not only on subjects related to SSR But With The Entire organization. We Agree with Ayesha Hassan's comment When She says the RT That Could examine how best practices would be included in Contracts as Referred to in Recommendation 12. We stress the need regarding Recommendation 23 Working Groups to Provide and Advisory Committees, of resources and Un certain freedoms in order to Develop high quality conclusions. Because of this, the RT Should plan how They believe ICANN can guarantee That This Way of working. We agree with Mikey O'Connor's public comment regarding the need to sharpen The Meaning of "risk management framework" in the document, and with ALAC's comment about the need for ICANN to Accelerate the creation and publication of a Comprehensive Framework for Formal and risk management of the DNS. It That is the goal of Important focusing on long-term Risks does not Imply paying less attention to short-term Risks. The design framework Should Be Done in multiple layers and from a perspective to measure and manage the DNS level. This framework Should Risk Analysis support, the likelihood and Impact of Changes in the DNS Infrastructure as well as the changes file in policy making. And we support Recommendation 28 for the purpose of ICANN to continue STI engagement in the planning and prevention of incidents, Providing outreach and education, all areas Involving concern concerned to preserve the multi-stakeholder model, bottom-up Including Processes And Also Allowing the participation of end-users Specialized Internet. The report Refers to the Absence of a Comprehensive Framework for Risk management of the DNS. So We Must Think About how this framework formally ought to be created with the Involvement of the SSAC, DSSA, DNS Risk Board Management Working Group, CSO and With The participation of Specialized stakeholders. * Juan Manuel Rojas - Jose Francisco Javier Arce Pallero - Fatima Cambronero - AGEIA Argentina and Colombia DENSI Chapters. * - * Fatima Cambronero * Attorney-Argentina Director of Research * Argentina * AGEIA DENSI http://ar.ageiadensi.org/ * @ Facambronero * * Join the LACRALO / ICANN discussions: * https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d58b5cf6f3.html --]]

1 0

Thanks!
by jumaropi＠yahoo.com April 13, 2012

April 13, 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Thanks! From: jumaropi(a)yahoo.com Hi all! I want to thank all members for their support LACRALO. If anyone wants to join an, this time to do it. I tell them that we are spreading the Charter on the Internet so they will by all means possible to congressmen and the community. Remember that the Charter find it here: http://ageiadensicolombia.blogspot.com/p/carta-al-congreso.html Sincerely, JUAN MANUEL ROJAS P Twitter: @ JmanuRojas ________________________________ From: "sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org" <sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org> To: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Posted: Wednesdays, April 11, 2012 6:18 PM Subject: [lac-discuss-en] RES: URGENT - Letter to the Congress of Colombia [[- Translated text (s -> en) -]] Subject: RES: URGENT - Letter to the Congress of Colombia From: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org Dear John Manuel: We Carefully ledo the letter to commission ingathering of meat in yesterday and Brazilian surfer unnimemente support Issued to letter it for you. Regards Sylvia Leite Herlein ----- Mensagem Original ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome Ageia Densi Colombia Posted in: Wednesdays, April 11, 2012 2:52 To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-dicuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Assunto: [lac-discuss-en] URGENT - Letter to the Congress of Colombia Dear, Envo the Following letter written to Establish We have our voice Approval from the protest the Law 201 of 2012.The law has Just been Approved by Congress votacin, the details are in the letter.I hope you read it and if they're Placed according Suggest the name of the ALS at the end to be sent to the Congress of Colombia and Means not only released by user name comunicacina Colombia, But Which Were Not Heard of the whole region. If anyone wants to read the text in Addition to the Law, found here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/629628/LeyTLC/gaceta103InformeDebate.pdf I look forward to Their signatures or support for it, thereof promptly. Honorable President of the Senate and the Chamber of Representatives of Colombia: We write on Behalf of Internet users in the region of Latin America and the Caribbean to Have a voice in the corporation of the Internet to Pin Assignments of the names and numbers - Given That ICANN existiun trouble Obligations to Implement the immense NAFTA.The overall process of 20-das tardms In Its not the end aprobacin from presentation by the President, all in order to Have results qumostrar During The Summit from the Americas to Jointly Develop Cartagena since last April 10 and WHERE all the attention estcentrada Means of communication. As I write These lines, the project you've just finished historical votaciny Been Approved by what awaits presidential sancin, ie to Already a law is Fact That worries us the whole Greatly WAS process Carried out as possible and not hidden yrpida ms taken Into account of civil society groups In This trmite and without events debate. Remember That the Same users Colombians joined to you discuss with you the Merits Of That Matters Act as Important as in the Following: 1.By Implementing the Measures PROTECTION 'technology (MPT) as a Independent PROTECTION Violate copyright rules may implementacin internal.The Must Be Such That the PROTECTION of MPT is not linked to independent But the right PROTECTION That author Occurs in Colombia. The topic has been discussed This in forums Such as the Australia, http://www.ivir.nl/publications/guibault/Infosoc_report_2007.pdf and Chile https://www.eff.org/files/filenode/FTAA/20040830_uschile_fta.pdf http://ictsd.org/i/publications/120934/. The central problem is That if this is not possible liability generation and asse penal users for use in the Exercise of Exceptions and Limitations stbNL> Allows our law, That is, I can order the jail by circumvent a TPM to make a private copy Which I have the right. 2. May also Violate the rights of users if, as In This version, it establishes the administrative procedure TLC Itself includes every 4 years to adjust These exceptions. The project is not Developed the overall procedure facutlad But only to the Government Propose to changes.Then we wonder, to quel afn? Neither is Being met With All the Obligations of NAFTA, LACK this. 3. The bill defines to include very Broadly Any profit advantage. There are exceptions and Limitations Such as private copying, Which On this definition dependent. However when to using it own FTA talks Advantage Financial or commercial gain. That is definacin obligation NAFTA text or match your Interests and may Violate the users. 4. If Not Properly Drafted That the item prohbe Retransmission of Internet TV signal can compromise Also Interests of users, as estevita Because that Way Widespread Limitations and exceptions apply to the Retransmission of signals of TV Internet. That is not the scope of the obligation of the FTA, it is Against of our national standards and Line with Perhaps it forbids censorship to date? 5. There is a great preocupacin by Delegating judicial functions, as staff is the delivery of information to an administrative authority. Ace we said in the discussion Lleras Law in the State Social Right Judges are the only ones to restrict That Have rights and powers Malthus and the basic freedoms only ones That can Deliver Personal information (Excerpt taken from the comments of jurdicos RedPaTodos) Unfortunately They Were not the only ones not Heard In This users non-debate, a group of Professors at American University United States Also joined the worry of the community Concluded That ms will alldel TLC Effectively, Which Provides more powerful That American internal standards and the result can generate That competitive Disadvantages Between the parties to the trade agreement. The Colombian academics peticin support the civil society to discuss Openly put the text to see, if possible, the Various interest and Comply With internal rules. That surprised the teachers are in terms of These items are Individuals isolated penalize speeding Even When playing the parts without know, not Indicate application of the Principle of Proportionality exists in the U.S.That so with only penalizes Some Activities Whose commercial mnima dimension measure is Given by the law (for example 10 copies minimum value of U.S. 2500). In Addition, and project sealan That Shall include as a minimum for medical evaluation of the three-step test as an element Whether an action is determined by criminal or not. As If This Were not enough, EFF, Electronic Frontier Foundation, también pronuncicon a statement April 9 That Lamla attention on Inadequate implementacin the TLC tendrel in our country, highlighting prescribed in law how copyright is NECESSARY for balanced proper balance of rights. Civil society has sat requests and comments to Congress to call for reflection and ask Them to Indicate Their Voting will ultimately form of monitoring is to have the citizen That veedura is the process and Their Ability to choose Their Representatives.The strategy is not new, the Movements Have Used over the past months Civilians Seems to be working and tirelessly life to a form of direct participation in politics for governments to But seen as joint Costs a form of freedom of expresiny of citizenship rights is Something That Takes an impressive value for democrtico system. The public pressure will not stop. Respectfully, ICANN ALS deLACRALO - AGEIA DENSI COLOMBIA www.ageiadensi.org / co nete our Association < https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHZTX2lRN1ZLdDFB MDNIMTBxcFpRSWc6MQ> Join our study <http://www.esurveyspro.com/Survey.aspx?id=656ad9b0-372e-49c5-8498-2f b343ebe330> _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0c7f52f7a2.html --]]

1 0

RES: URGENT - Letter to the Congress of Colombia
by sylvia＠internautabrasil.org April 13, 2012

April 13, 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: RES: URGENT - Letter to the Congress of Colombia From: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org Dear John Manuel: We ledo the letter carefully to ingathering of commission came in yesterday and Brazilian surfer unnimemente support it issued a letter for you. Regards Sylvia Leite Herlein ----- Mensagem Original ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome Ageia Densi Colombia Posted in: Wednesdays, April 11, 2012 2:52 To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-dicuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Assunto: [lac-discuss-en] URGENT - Letter to the Congress of Colombia Dear, Envo the following letter we have written to establish our voice protest the approval from the Law 201 of 2012. The law has just been votacin approved by Congress, the details are in the letter.I hope you read it and if they're placed according suggest the name of the ALS at the end to be sent to the Congress of Colombia and released by means not only name comunicacina user Colombia, which were not heard but of the whole region. If anyone wants to read the text in addition to the Law, found here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/629628/LeyTLC/gaceta103InformeDebate.pdf I look forward to their signatures or support for it, thereof promptly. Honorable President of the Senate and the Chamber of Representatives of Colombia: We write on behalf of Internet users in the region of Latin America and the Caribbean to have a voice in the corporation of the Internet to Pin Assignments of the names and numbers - given that ICANN existiun trouble immense to implement the obligations of NAFTA.The overall process 20-das tardms not in its end aprobacin from the presentation by the President, all in order to have results qumostrar during the Summit from the Americas to jointly develop Cartagena since last April 10 and where all the attention estcentrada means of communication. As I write these lines, the project has just finished his votaciny has been approved by what awaits presidential sancin, ie a fact is already a law that greatly worries us the whole process was carried out as possible yrpida ms hidden and not taken into account of civil society groups in this trmite and without even debate. Remember that the same users you Colombians joined to discuss with you the merits of that Act in matters as important as the following: 1. By implementing the measures PROTECTION 'technology (MPT) as a PROTECTION independent copyright may violate rules internal.The implementacin must be such that the PROTECTION of MPT is not independent but linked to the right PROTECTION author that occurs in Colombia. The topic has been discussed in forums such as the Australia, http://www.ivir.nl/publications/guibault/Infosoc_report_2007.pdf and Chile https://www.eff.org/files/filenode/FTAA/20040830_uschile_fta.pdf http://ictsd.org/i/publications/120934/. The central problem is that if this is not possible generation asse liability and penal users for use in the exercise of exceptions and limitations stbNL> <tbSP 2> allows our law, that is, I can order the jail by circumvent a TPM to make a private copy which I have the right. 2. May also violate the rights of users if, as in this version, it establishes the administrative procedure itself TLC includes every 4 years to adjust these exceptions. The project is not developed the procedure but only a general facutlad the government to propose changes. We wonder then, to quel afn?Neither is being met with all the obligations of NAFTA, lack this. 3. The bill defines very broadly profit to include any advantage. There are exceptions and limitations such as private copying, which dependent on this definition. However when using it own FTA talks commercial advantage or financial gain. That is definacin obligation NAFTA text or match your interests and may violate the users. 4. If not properly drafted prohbe item that the signal retransmission of Internet TV can also compromise interests of users, because that way as estevita widespread exceptions and limitations apply to the retransmission of signals of TV Internet. That is not the scope of the obligation of the FTA, it is against of our line with national standards and perhaps it forbids censorship to date? 5. There is a great preocupacin by delegating judicial functions, as is the delivery of personal information to an administrative authority. As we said in the debate Lleras Law in the State Social Right judges are the only ones that have powers to restrict rights and fundamental freedoms and thus the only ones that can deliver personal information (Excerpt taken from the comments of jurdicos RedPaTodos) Unfortunately they were not the only ones users not heard in this non-debate, a group of professors at American University United States also joined the worry of the community concluded that ms will effectively alldel TLC, which provides more powerful that American internal standards and that the result can generate competitive disadvantages between the parties to the trade agreement. The peticin academics support the Colombian civil society to discuss openly put the text to see, if possible, the various interest and comply with internal rules. The teachers are surprised that in terms of these items are penalize speeding isolated individuals even when playing the parts without know, indicate no application of the principle of proportionality exists in the U.S. so that only penalizes activities with some mnima commercial dimension whose measure is given by the law (for example 10 copies minimum value of U.S. 2500). In addition, sealan and project that shall include as a minimum for medical evaluation of the three-step test as an element determine whether an action is criminal or not. As if this were not enough, EFF, Electronic Frontier Foundation, is also pronuncicon a statement April 9 that Lamla attention on the TLC tendrel implementacin inadequate in our country, highlighting prescribed a law how copyright is necessary for balanced proper balance of rights. Civil society has sent requests and comments to Congress to call for reflection and ask them to indicate their Voting will ultimately is a form of control that has the citizen veedura is the process and their ability to choose their representatives. The strategy is not new, the movements have used civilians over the past months and seems to be working tirelessly life to a form of direct participation in politics for governments to joint costs but seen as a form of freedom of expresiny of citizenship rights is something that takes an impressive value for democrtico system. The public pressure will stop no. Respectfully, ICANN ALS deLACRALO - AGEIA DENSI COLOMBIA www.ageiadensi.org / co nete our Association < https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dHZTX2lRN1ZLdDFB MDNIMTBxcFpRSWc6MQ> Join our study <http://www.esurveyspro.com/Survey.aspx?id=656ad9b0-372e-49c5-8498-2f b343ebe330> _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/8baf75abef.html --]]

2 1

=? Utf-8? Q? ENC = 3A_Salvemos_Internet_del_ataque_de? == Utf-8? Q? _los_EEUU_-_ = C2 = C3 = ADble_respuesta A1incre =!? =
by sylvia＠internautabrasil.org April 13, 2012

April 13, 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: =? Utf-8? Q? ENC = 3A_Salvemos_Internet_del_ataque_de? == Utf-8? Q? _los_EEUU_-_ = C2 = C3 = ADble_respuesta A1incre =!? = From: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org Just wanted to share this information with you. Look what this NGO, AVAAZ is doing! And is coming to end users ... Sylvia Descrição: Assinatura_Sylvia_Internautabrasil From: Emma Ruby Sachs - Avaaz.org [mailto: avaaz(a)avaaz.org] Posted in: Friday, April 13, 2012 1:53 To: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org Assunto: Save Internet from attack by the U.S. - amazing response! Impressive, over 630,000 signers in just one week! Reach one million. Sign the petition and forward this message to everyone - Dear friends, <http://www.avaaz.org/es/stop_cispa/?cl=1722366996&v=13630> Right now, more than 100 U.S. lawmakers are pushing through a law that would allow them to spy on anyone on the Internet without a warrant. CISPA law is its third attempt to disguise his attack on global Internet freedom. Our mass protest laws helped curb SOUP and PIPA. Save web again: <http://www.avaaz.org/es/stop_cispa/?cl=1722366996&v=13630> Sign the petition Currently, the U.S. Congress is pushing through a new law by surprise would give them powers to spy, which Big Brother all over the web - and hope the world realizes. The last time I tried to attack freedom on the Internet, we help stop them. Let's do it again. Over 100 members of Congress are supporting legislation (CISPA) that would give private companies and the U.S. government the right to spy on any of us at any time and for as long as they want, without a warrant.This is the third time the U.S. Congress tries to take away our freedom on the Internet. But just so we could help defeat SOUP, and also PIPA, we can now force the withdrawal of the new law of Big Brother. Our global protest has played a key role in protecting the Internet against governments keen to control what we do on the web. Let us unite once again and defeat this law once and for all. Sign the petition and then send it to everyone who uses the Internet: http://www.avaaz.org/es/stop_cispa/?vl <http://www.avaaz.org/es/stop_cispa/?cl=1722366996&v=13630> Under the Law on protection of information exchange and cyber police (CISPA), the mere suspicion of a cyber threat would give ISPs and other companies operating in the network the right to seek information about our activities, share it with the government, refuse to notify us if we are being watched and then use an immunity clause to protect themselves from complaints about violation of privacy or other legal action.This is an unacceptable assault on privacy that trust every day when sending emails, talking on Skype, online search and more. But we know that the U.S. Congress is concerned about the reaction of world opinion. This is the third time I have tried to disguise their attack on our internet freedom and sneak a law, under another name, in the hope that people do not realize it. Already rights advocacy groups on the Internet, such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation, who have condemned this act by interference with basic rights to privacy, and now it's time for us to rule us also. Sign the petition to Congress by opposing the law CISPA. When we reach the 250,000 signatures, our call will be delivered to each of the 100 lawmakers who support the bill: http://www.avaaz.org/es/stop_cispa/?vl <http://www.avaaz.org/es/stop_cispa/?cl=1722366996&v=13630> Our Internet freedom is threatened every day by governments around the world - but is the U.S. who is best positioned to attack the rights of Internet users, because an important part of the network infrastructure is in its country. Our movement has shown, time and again that global public opinion can help stop the threat of U.S. Internet. Let's do it again! With hope, Emma, \u200b\u200bRewan, Ricken, Antonia, Lisa, Morgan, Maria Paz, Pascal and the whole Avaaz team More information: CISPA much worse than the law SOUP (Vanguard) http://www.vanguardia.com.mx/cispamuchopeorquelaleysopa-1256914.html List of major companies that support CISPA, the new SOUP (ALT1040): A new project on 'cyber' in the U.S. unleashed again alerts the Internet (The World) http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2012/04/06/navegante/1333703852.html HR3523: Act of 2011 to share and protect cyber-intelligence (text in English) http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr3523 <http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr3523 > <http://open.avaaz.org/act/open/1722366996.gif> Want to help build the Avaaz community? We're entirely funded by donations and receive no money from governments or corporations. Our dedicated team of campaign ensures that all contributions, even small ones, give a high yield: < https://secure.avaaz.org/es/donate_to_avaaz/?cl=1722366996&v=13630> _____ Avaaz campaign is a network of 14 million people, which works to ensure that the views and values \u200b\u200bof people throughout the world model the decision-making processes. The word "Avaaz" means "voice" or "song" in many languages. Avaaz members belong to all nations of the world, our team is located in 13 countries across 4 continents and operates in 14 languages.To learn more about the most important campaigns of Avaaz, click here <http://www.avaaz.org/es/highlights.php> Or follow us on Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/Avaaz> or Twitter <http://twitter.com/Avaaz> . This message was sent to sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org. To change your email address, language, unsubscribe, or other preferences, contact us through this form <http://avaaz.org/es/contact/?unsubHTML> - Or just click here < https://secure.avaaz.org/act/?r=unsub&cl=1722366996&email=sylvia@internauta…> To contact Avaaz, do not respond to this e-mail. Write us a message www.avaaz.org / en / contact <http://www.avaaz.org/es/contact?footer> or call us at +1-888-922-8229 (USA). [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/45c5f237c4.html --]]

1 0

New LACRALO
by josefranciscoarce＠gmail.com April 11, 2012

April 11, 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: New LACRALO From: josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com Dear, Despus of events in Costa Rica, week and moved very tight, I back to communicate with you to advance various issues, a) * Costa Rica - Capacitacin * Program: The week of the event in Costa Rica was very productive for reginy to reflect that with Dev we completing the final report of what happened there. b) * Working Groups *: For the working groups that were created in Costa Rica, in the programming estarn prxima teleconference dates in which reunirn. Great initiative. c) * General Assembly *: We will be giving the news in the prxima reunin monthly, which serel prximo April 19, 21 UTC. d) * Elections *: Dev enviun mail informing the next steps. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Estaractualizando prxima the agenda of the upcoming conference in give, do not forget to see and make comments that you create necessary. Regards JosArce. - _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/26843d1d35.html --]]

1 0