June 2015 - lac-discuss-en - lists.icann.org

New ALS Application received
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org Oct. 2, 2015

Oct. 2, 2015

Dear all, This is to inform you that we received an ALS application from the Association Haitienne des Internautes. It is based in Haiti, and would be a member of LACRALO if accepted. Please find the application form in French attached. The EN translation will be posted upon receipt. Staff are preparing the Due Diligence. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann.atlarge Twitter: @ICANN_AtLarge

4 4

Re: [lac-discuss-en] = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =????
by presidencia＠internauta.org.ar June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =???? From: presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar Dear Alexander, as you would anticipate verbally agree with everything exposed for you in this email and is the spirit of the group go through the same path. I think it exposed so clearly going to help translate various items that make up the central part of the draft. A big hug and good return! Sergio Salinas Porto President Internauta Argentina Argentina Users Association Internet / fetia / CTA Fluid Latin American Federation of Internet Users facebook: I salinasporto & sergiosalinasII twitter: sergiosalinas Google+: Sergio Salinas Porto Hangout: presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar / Pixelhub: salinasporto Youtube: I salinasporto Skype: internautaargentina Mobi: +54 9 223 5 215819 "Hopefully we can be disobedient, every time we receive orders humiliate our conscience or violate our common sense "Eduardo Galeano The 24/06/2015 13:59, "Alejandro Pisanty" <apisanty(a)gmail.com> He wrote: > Colegas, > > hoy en la reunión mensual, presencial (f2) sostuvimos una breve discusión > sobre métricas. > > A reserva de regresar esta discusión a su lugar en un Grupo de Trabajo, > creo que vale la pena dejar claro cuál es el objetivo de las métricas. Éste > está perfectamente entendido en la comunidad, y quienes dicen que no lo > hacen por un interés propio de distorsionar la discusión. > > Lo que necesitamos es rendición de cuentas y transparencia entre nosotros > mismos. Las personas y organizaciones que trabajan activametne deben ser > identificadas. Las organizaciones y personas que no contribuyen ni > participan deben decidir si van a participar o dejan de ser contadas. Y hay > una franja intermedia de organizaciones y representantes que encuentran > difícil participar pero tienen la voluntad de hacerlo. Entre éstas hay > muchos tipos de situaciones: un representante que se enferma o tiene que > dedicar tiempo a la familia o al trabajo que lo sostiene; un cambio de > directiva o de mandato; y muchas más circunstancias. > > Un buen sistema de métricas sería sencillo, transparente, predecible, y > difícil de falsificar. Haría un "triage", es decir, haría bastante evidente > cuáles son las 5-10 organizaciones que regularmente participan y > contribuyen, las 20 que están prácticamente abandonadas, y una franja > intermedia de 10 o 15 con las que hay que trabajar con esperanzas de que > recuperen su participación o abandonen la organización voluntariamente o > por la vía de la decertificación. Esto asume ciclos de renovación de las > certificaciones, que debemos instituir. > > Hay una clasificación de las participaciones que nos puede ayudar aún más > en este proceso: > > 1. participación regular y consistente en todas las actividades, y > contribución a aspectos sustantivos de política. Sus propuestas son > incorporadas en resoluciones de LACRALO y tienen impacto en las políticas > de ALAC y de ICANN. > > 2. participación esporádica y/o dedicada a asuntos de procedimiento > reglaments, formatos de acuerdos pero no sus contenidos, etc. > > 3. participaciones esporádicas, poco enfocadas, y fundamentalmente > conducentes a "hacer presencia" para elecciones y procesos de selección > para la participación en eventos, especialmente si conllevan apoyos para > viajes. > > Nuestra observación o medición de la participación de las organizaciones > debe favorecer el tipo 1, desfavorecer el tipo 3, e impulsar que quienes > hacen participaciones del tipo 2 pasen al nivel 1. > > Si podemos tener acuerdo alrededor de estos principios, el Grupo de > Trabajo de Gobernanza y el de Métricas sólo tienen que producir una buena > implementación y su trabajo será más confiable, predecible y alcanzable. > > ¿Hay algún desacuerdo con estos principios generales? > > Alejandro Pisanty > > -- > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > Facultad de Química UNAM > Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD > +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, > http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/408a79a35f.html --]]

1 0

= utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =????
by apisanty＠gmail.com June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =???? From: apisanty(a)gmail.com Colleagues, today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion on metrics. Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not They made by self-interest to distort the discussion. What we need we are accountability and transparency between us thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer counted. And there an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to spend time with family or work that sustains; changing directive or mandate; and many more circumstances. A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would rather obvious 5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles certifications, we must institute. There is a classification of units that can help us further in this process: 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy ALAC and ICANN. 2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc. 3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally leading to "make presence" for elections and selection processes for participation in events, especially if they involve support for travel. Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who make appearances type 2 pass to level 1. If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and achievable. Is there any disagreement with these general principles? Alejandro Pisanty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM Faculty of Chemistry 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/22a894d8ba.html --]]

3 5

Re: [lac-discuss-en] [lac-discuss-es] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
by Alejandro Pisanty June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

Hola, creo que estamos en posición de declarar un consenso sobre estos lineamientos Ayer Sergio y otros me manifestaron verbalmente apoyo a la propuesta. Alberto y Humberto, de verdad de verdad les pido instituir el proceso correspondiente. Con este consenso podemos: 1. explorar la situación real de las organizaciones sin iniciar procesos formales; 2. explorar cuáles serían las reglas formales aplicables; 3. ayudar de inmediato a las organizaciones que más lo necesiten. Saludos cordiales Alejandro Pisanty On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:42 AM, <jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com> wrote: > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? > Desde: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com > > El diablo, es siempre, sin embargo, en los detalles. > El 25 de junio 2015 10:28, "Carlton Samuels" < > carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> escribió: > > > > Yes, we are now in the ballpark. I can support these for baseline. > > > > -Carlton > > > > > > ============================== > > Carlton A Samuels > > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > > ============================= > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > >> > >> Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =???? > >> From: apisanty(a)gmail.com > >> > >> Colleagues, > >> > >> > >> today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion > >> on metrics. > >> > >> > >> Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, > >> I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This > >> It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not > >> They made by self-interest to distort the discussion. > >> > >> > >> What we need we are accountability and transparency between us > >> thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be > >> identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute > >> They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer > >> counted. And there > >> an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are > >> difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there > >> Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to > >> spend time with family or work that sustains; changing > >> directive or mandate; and many more circumstances. > >> > >> > >> A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and > >> difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would > >> rather obvious > >> 5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and > >> They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip > >> intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that > >> recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or > >> by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles > >> certifications, we must institute. > >> > >> > >> There is a classification of units that can help us further > >> in this process: > >> > >> > >> 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and > >> contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are > >> LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy > >> ALAC and ICANN. > >> > >> > >> 2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters > >> Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc. > >> > >> > >> 3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally > >> leading to "make presence" for elections and selection > >> processes > >> for participation in events, especially if they involve support for > >> travel. > >> > >> > >> Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations > >> should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who > >> make appearances type 2 pass to level 1. > >> > >> > >> If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group > >> Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good > >> implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and > >> achievable. > >> > >> > >> Is there any disagreement with these general principles? > >> > >> > >> Alejandro Pisanty > >> > >> > >> - > >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > >> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > >> UNAM Faculty of Chemistry > >> 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > >> + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD > >> SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 > >> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > >> UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, > >> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > >> ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > >> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > >> > >> > >> > > > > [[--Original text (en) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ca7fb3bcbe.html > --]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Química UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2 1

Re: [lac-discuss-en] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? From: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org Dear Alexander, just finished ICANN 53, we will with this and everything else that is still working. Best regards Alberto Soto From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] In the name of Alejandro Pisanty Posted on: Thursday, June 25, 2015 24:35 To: LACRALO CC: LACRALO discussion list Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? Hello, I think we are in a position to declare a consensus on these guidelines yesterday Sergio and others verbally expressed my support for the proposal. Alberto and Humberto, really really ask you to institute the appropriate process. With this agreement we can: 1. explore the real situation of the non initiate formal proceedings; 2. explore what formal rules would apply; 3. immediately help organizations that need it most. Best regards Alejandro Pisanty On Thu, June 25, 2015 at 11:42 a.m., <jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com <mailto:jam@jacquelinemorris.com> > Wrote: [[Translated text (en -> en) -]] Subject: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? From: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com <mailto:jam@jacquelinemorris.com> The devil is always, however, in the details. The June 25, 2015 10:28 "Carlton Samuels" <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com> > He wrote: > Yes, we are now in the ballpark. I can support these for baseline. > > -Carlton > > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 <tel:876-818-1799> > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, <apisanty(a)gmail.com <mailto:apisanty@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] >> >> Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =???? >> From: apisanty(a)gmail.com <mailto:apisanty@gmail.com> >> >> Colleagues, >> >> >> today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion >> on metrics. >> >> >> Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, >> I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This >> It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not >> They made by self-interest to distort the discussion. >> >> >> What we need we are accountability and transparency between us >> thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be >> identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute >> They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer >> counted. And there >> an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are >> difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there >> Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to >> spend time with family or work that sustains; changing >> directive or mandate; and many more circumstances. >> >> >> A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and >> difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would >> rather obvious >> 5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and >> They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip >> intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that >> recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or >> by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles >> certifications, we must institute. >> >> >> There is a classification of units that can help us further >> in this process: >> >> >> 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and >> contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are >> LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy >> ALAC and ICANN. >> >> >> 2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters >> Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc. >> >> >> 3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally >> leading to "make presence" for elections and selection >> processes >> for participation in events, especially if they involve support for >> travel. >> >> >> Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations >> should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who >> make appearances type 2 pass to level 1. >> >> >> If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group >> Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good >> implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and >> achievable. >> >> >> Is there any disagreement with these general principles? >> >> >> Alejandro Pisanty >> >> >> - >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty >> UNAM Faculty of Chemistry >> 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico >> + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD >> SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 >> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty >> UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, >> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty >> ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org >> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >> >> >> [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/75a2ccc26a.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ????
by apisanty＠gmail.com June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? From: apisanty(a)gmail.com Hello, I think we are in a position to declare a consensus on these Yesterday Sergio guidelines and other verbally expressed support me proposal. Alberto and Humberto, really really ask you to institute the process corresponding. With this agreement we can: 1. explore the real situation of the non initiate processes formal; 2. explore what formal rules would apply; 3. immediately help organizations that need it most. Best regards Alejandro Pisanty On Thu, June 25, 2015 at 11:42 a.m., <jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com> wrote: > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz = ???? > Desde: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com > > El diablo, es siempre, sin embargo, en los detalles. > El 25 de junio 2015 10:28, "Carlton Samuels" < > carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> escribió: > > > > Yes, we are now in the ballpark. I can support these for baseline. > > > > -Carlton > > > > > > ============================== > > Carlton A Samuels > > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > > ============================= > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:57 AM, <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > >> > >> Subject: = utf-8 b TcOpdHJpY2Fz =???? > >> From: apisanty(a)gmail.com > >> > >> Colleagues, > >> > >> > >> today at the monthly meeting face (f2) we held a brief discussion > >> on metrics. > >> > >> > >> Subject to this discussion back to his place in a working group, > >> I think it is worth to make clear what the objective metrics. This > >> It is well understood in the community, and those who say they do not > >> They made by self-interest to distort the discussion. > >> > >> > >> What we need we are accountability and transparency between us > >> thereof. Individuals and organizations working activametne be > >> identified. Organizations and individuals that do not contribute > >> They involved to decide whether they will participate or no longer > >> counted. And there > >> an intermediate strip of organizations and representatives who are > >> difficult to participate but have the will to do so.Among these there > >> Many types of situations: a representative who is sick or has to > >> spend time with family or work that sustains; changing > >> directive or mandate; and many more circumstances. > >> > >> > >> A good metric system would be simple, transparent, predictable, and > >> difficult to counterfeit. Would make a "triage", ie would > >> rather obvious > >> 5-10 which are regularly participating organizations and > >> They contribute 20 which are practically abandoned, and a strip > >> intermediate 10 or 15 with which we must work in hopes that > >> recover their participation or leave the organization voluntarily or > >> by way of decertification. This assumes renewal cycles > >> certifications, we must institute. > >> > >> > >> There is a classification of units that can help us further > >> in this process: > >> > >> > >> 1. Regular and consistent participation in all activities, and > >> contribution to substantive policy issues.His proposals are > >> LACRALO incorporated into resolutions and have impact on policy > >> ALAC and ICANN. > >> > >> > >> 2. sporadic participation and / or devoted to procedural matters > >> Reglaments, formats agreements but not their contents, etc. > >> > >> > >> 3. sporadic appearances, little focus, and fundamentally > >> leading to "make presence" for elections and selection > >> processes > >> for participation in events, especially if they involve support for > >> travel. > >> > >> > >> Our observation or measurement of participation of organizations > >> should favor the type 1, type 3 disadvantage, and encourage those who > >> make appearances type 2 pass to level 1. > >> > >> > >> If we can have agreement around these principles, the Working Group > >> Governance Metrics and only have to produce a good > >> implementation and their work will be more reliable, predictable and > >> achievable. > >> > >> > >> Is there any disagreement with these general principles? > >> > >> > >> Alejandro Pisanty > >> > >> > >> - > >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > >> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > >> UNAM Faculty of Chemistry > >> 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > >> + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD > >> SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 > >> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > >> UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, > >> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > >> ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > >> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > >> > >> > >> > > > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4bd4b5b256.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: ALAC Vote on the CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal
by fatimacambronero＠gmail.com June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Fwd: ALAC Vote on the CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal From: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com FYI, ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> Date: 25/06/2015 6:19 GMT-05: 00 Subject: [ALAC] ALAC Vote on the CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal To: ALAC <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> I am pleased to report the ALAC has unanimously That Ratified the CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal. The text of the report is attached. Alan _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ccd4ab0c93.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: [ALAC] ALAC Vote on the CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal
by Fatima Cambronero June 25, 2015

June 25, 2015

FYI, ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca> Date: 2015-06-25 6:19 GMT-05:00 Subject: [ALAC] ALAC Vote on the CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal To: ALAC <alac(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> I am pleased to report that the ALAC has unanimously ratified the CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal. The text of the report is attached. Alan _______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list ALAC(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(AL… -- *Fatima Cambronero* Abogada-Argentina Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter: @facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Meeting 3A_LACRALO_GSE_Capacity_Building_Webinar_ICANN
by amedinagomez＠gmail.com June 24, 2015

June 24, 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Meeting 3A_LACRALO_GSE_Capacity_Building_Webinar_ICANN From: amedinagomez(a)gmail.com Confirm participation Best regard Antonio Medina Gomez ACUI On 24/06/2015 14:29, <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> He wrote: > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto:???????????? = UTF-8 q _Meeting_Invitation = = = > 3A_LACRALO_GSE_Cap utf-8 q acity_Building_Webinar_ = E2 = 80 = 93_ICANN_ = > 28Basic_Level = = = 29_07_Jul utf-8 q y_2015_at_23 = 3A00_UTC = > Desde: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > Queridos miembros de LACRALO, > > > > > > > Como uno de los proyectos del Plan Estratégico ALC / LACRALO 2015, la > cuarta Capacity Building Webinar titulado "ICANN y su estructura > (Nivel Básico)" se celebrará el 07 de julio 2015 a las 23:00 UTC. > > > > > > > Ponentes invitados: Albert Daniels - Gerente, grupos de interés, la ICANN > Caribe y Carlos Aguirre, LACRALO. > > > > > > > Orden del día > 1. Moderador: Silvia Vivanco - Gerente, En Asuntos Regionales grandes > 2. > 3. Ecosistemas del DNS (Nivel Básico) > > > 1. Historia > > > 2. Hitos > > > 3. Financiación > > > 4.El modelo de múltiples partes interesadas > > > 5. Los gobiernos y el GAC > > > 6. ccNSO > > > 7. gNSO > > > 8. ASO > > > 9. ALAC > > > 10. SNCC > > > 11. RSSAC > > > 12. Junta de ICANN > > > 13. zonas Personal > > > 14. ¿Cómo participar > > > 15. Preguntas y respuestas > > > > > > > El proyecto de orden del día (para ser actualizado) y detalles de > llamadas están disponibles en: https://community.icann.org/x/e6E0Aw > > > > > > > Adigo ID de conferencia: > > > ES: 1638 > > > ES: 1738 > > > PT: 5393 > > > > > Adigo dial-en número: https://adigo.com/icann/ > Adobe Connect (con audio bidireccional en español): > http://icann.adobeconnect.com/lacralo > > > > > > > Este webinar tendrá Inglés, interpretación en portugués y español. > > > > > > > > > > > Si necesita una línea de salida por favor, póngase en contacto con > At-Large personal staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > con su número preferido. > > > > > > > > > > > Gracias. > > > > > > > Saludos cordiales, > > > > > > > De la ICANN VP Stakeholder Engagement- Latinoamérica anuncio el Caribe - > Rodrigo de la Parra LACRALO Presidente, Alberto Soto y Secretaría, Humberto > Carrasco Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, > Nathalie Peregrine y Terri Agnew personal de ICANN Política en apoyo de ALAC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0310121b7e.html --]]

1 0

Meeting Invitation: LACRALO GSE Capacity Building Webinar – ICANN (Basic Level) 07 July 2015 at 23:00 UTC
by ICANN At-Large Staff June 24, 2015

June 24, 2015

Dear LACRALO members, As one of the projects of the Strategic Plan LAC/LACRALO 2015, the fourth Capacity Building Webinar entitled " ICANN and its Structure(Basic Level) " will be held on 07 July 2015 at 23:00 UTC. Invited Speakers : Albert Daniels – Manager, Stakeholder Engagement, The Caribbean ICANN and Carlos Aguirre, LACRALO. Agenda 1. Moderator: Silvia Vivanco - Manager, At Large Regional Affairs 2. 3. DNS Ecosystem (Basic Level) 1. History 2. Milestones 3. Funding 4. The multi-stakeholder model 5. Governments and the GAC 6. ccNSO 7. gNSO 8. ASO 9. ALAC 10. SSAC 11. RSSAC 12. ICANN Board 13. Staff areas 14. How to participate 15. Questions and Answers The draft agenda (to be updated) and call details are available at: https://community.icann.org/x/e6E0Aw ADIGO Conference ID: EN: 1638 ES: 1738 PT: 5393 ADIGO dial-in numbers: https://adigo.com/icann/ Adobe Connect (with two-way audio in Spanish): http://icann.adobeconnect.com/lacralo This Webinar will have English, Portuguese and Spanish interpretation. If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> with your preferred number. Thank you. Kind regards, ICANN's VP Stakeholder Engagement- Latin America ad the Caribbean - Rodrigo de la Parra LACRALO Chair, Alberto Soto and Secretariat, Humberto Carrasco Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC

1 0