August 2015 - lac-discuss-en

Re: [lac-discuss-en] = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ?????
by apisanty＠gmail.com Aug. 3, 2015

Aug. 3, 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? From: apisanty(a)gmail.com Jacqueline, Juan Manuel, all, the regional point of view has been expressed in the consensus we achieved to out of the meeting in Buenos Aires, with general criteria for ALS which they reached consensus and are of great strength and general validity. I hope these guidelines define what they will do our representatives. Alejandro Pisanty On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 3:12 PM, <jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com> wrote: > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto: Re: = UTF-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = > UTF-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce = ????? > De: jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com > > Muchas gracias. Haré mi mejor esfuerzo para representar a toda la región > en el > WG. > Jacqueline > > > Jacqueline A. Morris > La tecnología debe ser como el oxígeno: Ubicuo, necesario, invisible y > Gratis. (Después de que Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> ) > > > El Sol, 02 de agosto 2015 a las 12:29 PM <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> > escribió: > > > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > > > ??? Subject: = utf-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = > > utf-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce =????? > > From: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org > > > > Dear, on this issue we have had four nominations. According to the above > > criteria opportunely, they have been selected: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jacqueline Morris > > > > > > - Juan Manuel Rojas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We know that this WG will have a hard work, and the first meeting will > be > > tomorrow August 3rd. I will notify Juan Manuel Jacqueline and schedule > the > > meeting. > > > > > > Best regards > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alberto Soto > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > Avast antivirus software scanned this email for viruses. > > http://www.avast.com > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/bbfcc5232b.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] FW: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization
by apisanty＠gmail.com Aug. 3, 2015

Aug. 3, 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: FW: VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization From: apisanty(a)gmail.com Vanda, report failures, far as I can identify are important. Have the courage to vote against it and make it work It is well finished. Alejandro Pisanty On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Vanda Scartezini <vanda(a)etges.com.br> wrote: > Dear all, > A vote is calling in ALAC on the propose of ratification of the ALAC > draft statement on GNSO review ( see email below) , some of us just > contribute. > I need to vote till next Thursday. Please, if someone has any position > against please not posted on public comment that will demand a change on my > vote, please make it public. > If none I intend to vote in favor though I personally believe, and had > made such statement, that the review itself was really weak and did not > touch several relevant points. Due the huge involvement of GNSO on the new > gTLDs during such review I believe the time frame was not opportune. For > the same reason I was in favor to postpone ALAC review to leave IANA > stewardship transition to finish and we could pay all our attention on such > review. > Appreciate any feedback. > > > *Vanda Scartezini* > *Polo Consultores Associados* > *Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004* > *01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil* > *Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253* > *Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 * > *So**rry for any typos. * > > > From: <alac-announce-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of ICANN > Staff > Reply-To: ICANN Staff > Date: Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 09:00 > To: "alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" > Subject: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the Draft > Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization > > Dear All, > > Alan Greenberg, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a vote be held by the > ALAC on the proposed ratification of a draft ALAC Statement in response to > a public comment request. Please note that only the 15 ALAC members will > cast votes in this poll. > > ***** > Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Statement on the > Draft Report: Review of the Generic Names Supporting Organization > <https://community.icann.org/x/35U0Aw>" for the communication to relevant > parties? > ***** > > Please note that the poll will be open from *01**-August-2015 12:00 UTC* > to *06**-August-**2015 12**:00** UTC**.* > > Regards, > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > Peregrine and Terri Agnew > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> > atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> > Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge > <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> > _______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce At-Large > Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM Faculty of Chemistry Av.University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c85121c378.html --]]

1 0

= utf-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = utf-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce =?????
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org Aug. 2, 2015

Aug. 2, 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] ??? Subject: = utf-8 q = C3 = CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI 3A_At 93N = - = = utf-8 q Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce =????? From: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org Dear, on this issue we have had four nominations. According to the above criteria opportunely, they have been selected: Jacqueline Morris - Juan Manuel Rojas We know that this WG will have a hard work, and the first meeting will be tomorrow August 3rd. I will notify Juan Manuel Jacqueline and schedule the meeting. Best regards Alberto Soto --- Avast antivirus software scanned this email for viruses. http://www.avast.com [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/2b0f96a077.html --]]

2 1

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ??? Q = utf-8 CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI = C3 = 93N = 3A__At = = utf-8 q -Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce =?????
by crg＠isoc-cr.org Aug. 2, 2015

Aug. 2, 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:??? Q = utf-8 CONVOCATORIA_DE_AFILIACI = C3 = 93N = 3A__At = = utf-8 q -Large_ALS_Criterios_y_Expectativas_Taskforce =????? From: crg(a)isoc-cr.org Thanks Alberto, Please Put me as a "participant" in the working group. Thank you Carlos Raul Gutierrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg On 2 Aug 2015, at 10:28 Alberto Soto wrote: > Estimados, respecto de este tema hemos tenido cuatro postulaciones. > Según los criterios citados oportunamente, han sido seleccionados: > > > > -Jacqueline Morris > > - Juan Manuel Rojas > > > > Ya sabemos que este WG tendrá un intenso trabajo, y la primera > reunión será mañana 3 de agosto. Les avisaré a Jacqueline y a > Juan Manuel el horario de dicha reunión. > > Saludos cordiales > > > > Alberto Soto > > > > --- > El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico > en busca de virus. > http://www.avast.com > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/7d97a409e5.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: US Circuit Court Upholds ICANN's Defense of the New gTLD Program
by Carlton Samuels Aug. 1, 2015

Aug. 1, 2015

FYI ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= [image: ICANN] <https://www.icann.org/> News Alert https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2015-07-31-en ------------------------------ US Circuit Court Upholds ICANN's Defense of the New gTLD Program 31 July 2015 *Los Angeles, California*... The United States' Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed the dismissal of antitrust and other claims against ICANN made by a company called name.space, related to ICANN's new generic Top Level Domain (gTLD) Program, in an opinion published today <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/namespace-ninth-circuit-affirmi…> [PDF, 116 KB]. In 2013, a federal district court dismissed all of name.space's claims, and today the Ninth Circuit affirmed that dismissal in all respects. name.space alleged that ICANN violated the Sherman Act, and various trademark and other laws, in establishing the New gTLD Program and setting the application fee for new gTLD applications at US$185,000. name.space also suggested that ICANN should set aside names found in name.space's “alternative internet.” The plaintiff claimed that the rules and procedures governing the 2012 New gTLD Program Application Round were the result of an illegal conspiracy between ICANN, its board members and domain-name industry insiders, citing U.S. antitrust law (specifically Section 1 of the Sherman Act). "We are pleased that the Ninth Circuit agreed with the dismissal of the claims against ICANN in this matter", said John Jeffrey, ICANN's General Counsel and Secretary. "The rules and procedures governing the New gTLD Program were created through a global, inclusive, open and multistakeholder process, following a bottom-up policy development process leading to consensus-based policy recommendations. Accordingly, the Court found it could not "infer an anticompetitive agreement' from the facts presented in this case." In finding in favor of ICANN, the Court determined that “ICANN is not a competitor” in the three relevant markets the plaintiff identified as the basis of its monopolization claim (citing the tests from Section 2 of the Sherman Act): 1. The market to act as a TLD registry; 2. The international market for domain names; 3. The market for blocking or defensive registration services. Finally, the Court also found that name.space's trademark claims were not ripe, and its common law claims did not allege sufficient facts to be able to state a claim against ICANN. ICANN was represented in this matter by Jones Day.

1 0

Fwd: Proposed ICANN Bylaws Amendments—GNSO Policy & Implementation Recommendations
by Carlton Samuels Aug. 1, 2015

Aug. 1, 2015

FYI & A ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= [image: ICANN] <https://www.icann.org/> News Alert https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-3-2015-07-31-en ------------------------------ Proposed ICANN Bylaws Amendments—GNSO Policy & Implementation Recommendations 31 July 2015 *Forum Announcement:* Comment Period Opens on *Date:* 31 July 2015 *Categories/Tags:* Policy Processes *Purpose (Brief):* During its meeting on 24 June 2015, the GNSO Council unanimously adopted the recommendations of the GNSO Policy & Implementation Working Group (see: http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/policy-implementation-recommendations-01jun…) which was tasked to address a number of questions as they relate to GNSO policy and implementation. Among others, these recommendations include three proposed new GNSO processes, two of which—the GNSO Guidance Process (GGP) and the GNSO Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP)—require changes to the ICANN Bylaws1 <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bylaws-amendments-2015-07-31-en#foot1> subject to ICANN Board approval. Per its resolution of 28 July 2015 (see: https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2015-07-28-en#1.c) the ICANN Board has directed that these proposed changes to the ICANN Bylaws be posted for public comment prior to ICANN Board consideration. *Public Comment Box Link:* https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bylaws-amendments-2015-07-31-en 1 <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bylaws-amendments-2015-07-31-en#note1>These proposed changes to the ICANN Bylaws are accompanied by a GGP and EPDP Manual, which can be found in Annex D and F of the GNSO Policy & Implementation Final Report (see: http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/policy-implementation-recommendations-01jun…) and would be incorporated into the GNSO Operating Procedures following adoption of the proposed ICANN Bylaws changes by the ICANN Board.

1 0

Fw: Initial Report on Data & Metrics for Policy Making
by Carlton Samuels Aug. 1, 2015

Aug. 1, 2015

FYI &A ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= [image: ICANN] <http://www.icann.org/> News Alert https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-07-29-en ------------------------------ Initial Report on Data & Metrics for Policy Making 29 July 2015 *Forum Announcement:* Comment Period Opens on *Date:* 29 July 2015 *Categories/Tags:* Policy Processes *Purpose (Brief):* This public comment proceeding seeks to obtain community input on the Initial Report from the GNSO's Working Group (WG) on possible recommendations for the use of Data and Metrics for Policy Making. The WG's intent is to develop solutions that will improve the way in which consensus policies are developed and help ensure that the most critical registrant, registry, and registrar issues are addressed by evolving the culture to better informed, fact-based policy development and decision-making. *Public Comment Box Link:* https://www.icann.org/public-comments/data-metrics-policy-making-2015-07-29…

1 0