October 2016 - lac-discuss-en

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ??????? = Utf-8 Los_informes_de_la_GTC_sobre_el_uso_de q = q = utf-8 _nombres_de_pa = C3 = ADses_y_Territorio_como_dominios_de_primer_ni = = utf-8 q vel =?????
by crg＠isoc-cr.org Oct. 28, 2016

Oct. 28, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:??????? = Utf-8 Los_informes_de_la_GTC_sobre_el_uso_de q = q = utf-8 _nombres_de_pa = C3 = ADses_y_Territorio_como_dominios_de_primer_ni = = utf-8 q vel =????? Desde: crg(a)isoc-cr.org Aida thank you very much. I agree with you on some important aspects of the document and suggest these are developed / written more clearly, not compromise the role "Advisory" ALAC / LACRALO before respective periods of public consultation of the work of the other SOs / ACs. I look better this have clarified my position and you thank you. Good weekend Carlos Raul Gutierrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current offset UTC: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On October 28, 2016, at 3:21 Noblia Aida wrote: > Muchas Gracias Raúl por tu aclaración, que es muy importante, dado > que > refiere a la pertinencia de nuestras opiniones, las cuales entonces no > corresponderían, sino estar a lo que manifiesten los órganos > competentes. > > En ese punto no tenemos opinión al respecto, pero es cierto que el > tema > tiene ese ámbito de discusión y que en el GAC en la reunión de > junio > pasado, lo que se discutió es respecto a la manifestación de > voluntad en > particular el valor del silencio de un representante país, lo que se > consideró que no tenía significado negativo, no el tema central de > nuestra > preocupación. > > Por otro lado, la declaración de LACTLD no se cierra solo al rechazo > de la > solución respecto a los códigos de 2 letras sino que en el punto 3 > lo que > plantea es que se aclare la redacción del documento y se especifique > claramente que el ofrecimiento por el Registry en los 30 días se > realice > tanto al Gobierno como al Administrador del ccTLD correspondiente y no > a > cualquiera de ellos o a uno solo. > > Esta observación refiere a la redacción aparentemente oscura en el > documento inicial, y en ese sentido está aceptando la solución de > que se > acepten estos códigos de 2 letras similares a los código país, con > niveles > de control mayores que el resto y solamente está observando un tema > de > redacción, lo cual podría ser tenido en cuenta si así lo deciden > los > organismos encargados de resolver este tema. > > Atentos Saludos > Aída Noblia > > https://www.lactld.org/news/comentarios-de-lactld-sobre-etiquetas-ascii-de-… > > El 27 de octubre de 2016, 23:46, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. > <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> > escribió: > >> Gracias Aida por tus excelentes aclaraciones. >> Mi posición es que los ccTLD mangers tienen su propio grupo en >> ICANN, a >> través del ccNSO. Yo estoy de acuerdo que el ccNSO es la fuente >> principal >> de desarrollo de política para los temas de referencia, tanto al >> primer >> como al segundo nivel. Con todo respeto no considero apropiado que >> sea ALAC >> y/o LACRALO quien deba tomar posición a favor o en contra de la >> entre los >> Gobiernos y los respectivos gestores de los ccTLD. Croe que eso es >> tema a >> dilucidar entre el ccNSO y el GAC, donde actualmente se discuten esos >> temas >> (tanto el CWG ccNSO GNSO on the Use of Country an Territory Names, >> como el >> WG del GAC on Geographic Names). El hecho de que los Gobiernos de la >> región >> LAC no hayan hecho caso al llamado respectivo es de por si ya muy >> preocupante. Yo solo sugiero conocer y considerar primero las >> posiciones y >> esfuerzos respectivos, comentando directamente tanto a los reportes >> del GAC >> como del ccNSO en los procesos de consulta publica, antes de >> adelantar >> nuestra opinion basados en la carta de LACTLD solamente. >> Respetuosamente >> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez >> +506 8837 7176 >> Skype: carlos.raulg >> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) >> On 27 Oct 2016, at 17:39, Aida Noblia wrote: >> >> Respecto al GAC, en la reunión de Junio pasado en Helsinki se llegó >> al >> acuerdo que para poder ser usados los códigos de 2 caracteres de >> país en el >> segundo nivel, más allá que un país no haya expresado su >> preferencia, la >> falta de respuesta no indica consentimiento. El consentimiento para >> el uso >> de estos dos caracteres debe ser expreso por parte de los países. >> Por lo >> tanto mientras no lo haga no pueden usarse esos códigos. La >> declaración de >> LACTLD menciona que se debería solicitar en este caso no solo el >> consentimiento del país sino el del Administrador respectivo, para >> mayor >> garantía de los usuarios finales. >> >> >> >> Saludos >> >> >> 2016-10-27 9:16 GMT-03:00 <crg(a)isoc-cr.org>: >> >>> >>> [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] >>> >>> Asunto: Fwd: Los informes de la GTC sobre el uso de nombres de >>> países y >>> Territorio como dominios de primer nivel >>> De: crg(a)isoc-cr.org >>> >>> Estimados, >>> >>> >>> en los links adjuntos pueden ver los Avances de el ccNSO >>> GNSO-GTC-El uso >>> de >>> Nombres de países y territorios. De Creo Que ESTOS Documentos >>> Relevantes >>> hijo >>> para la Difusión con LACTLD, AUNQUE Se Trata solo de Nombres de >>> Países >>> Territorios y al Primer Nivel. >>> >>> >>> Gracias y saludos >>> >>> >>> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez >>> +506 8837 7176 >>> Skype: carlos.raulg >>> desplazamiento UTC actual: -6.00 (Costa Rica) >>> Mensaje reenviado: >>> >>> >>>> From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> >>>> To: gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org <gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org> >>>> Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Reports from the CWG on Use of Country >>>> and >>>> Territory Names as TLDs >>>> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:12:11 +0000 >>>> >>>> Dear WG Members, >>>> >>>> Of particular interest to sub team 2 in its work on reserved names, >>>> but possibly others as well â€“ >>>> >>>> The CWG on Use of Country and Territory Names as TLDs has released >>>> two >>>> reports in advance of ICANN57: >>>> >>>> - A progress report discussing the groupâ€™s work to >>>> date and >>>> outlining recommendations for future work >>>> >>>> - A draft of the CWGâ€™s Interim Report, which will >>>> be >>>> subject to public comment before becoming the groupâ€™s Final >>>> Report >>>> >>>> Both reports are attached and available at >>>> https://community.icann.org/display/CWGOUCNT/Output+and+Draft+Documents >>>> . >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Emily >>>> >>>> Emily Barabas | Policy Specialist >>>> ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers >>>> Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list >>>> Gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org >>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1acbd63e64.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] = utf-8 Los_informes_de_la_GTC_sobre_el_uso_de q = q = utf-8 _nombres_de_pa = C3 = ADses_y_Territorio_como_dominios_de_pr = = utf-8 imer_nivel q =????????????
by aidanoblia＠gmail.com Oct. 28, 2016

Oct. 28, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: = utf-8 Los_informes_de_la_GTC_sobre_el_uso_de q = q = utf-8 _nombres_de_pa = C3 = ADses_y_Territorio_como_dominios_de_pr = = utf-8 imer_nivel q =???????????? Desde: aidanoblia(a)gmail.com Raul Thank you for your clarification, which is very important, since refers to the relevance of our opinions, which then no They correspond, but be that they inform the relevant bodies. At this point we have no opinion about it, but it is true that the issue has that level of discussion and that the GAC at the June meeting past, what was discussed is about the expression of will in particularly the value of silence representative of a country, which is considered that had no meaning no, not the focus of our concern. On the other hand, the statement does not close LACTLD only the rejection of the solution regarding 2-letter codes but at what point 3 arises is that the wording of the document clarified and specified clearly that the offer by the Registry within 30 days is performed both the Government and the relevant ccTLD Administrator and not to any of them or just one. This observation relates to the seemingly obscure wording in the initial document, and in that sense it is accepting that solution accept these codes similar to the country 2-letter code, with levels greater control than the rest and is observing only a matter of writing, which could be taken into account if they choose the agencies to resolve this issue. Kind Regards Aida Noblia https://www.lactld.org/news/comentarios-de-lactld-sobre-etiquetas-ascii-de-… On October 27, 2016, 23:46, Carlos Raul Gutierrez G. <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> wrote: > Gracias Aida por tus excelentes aclaraciones. > Mi posición es que los ccTLD mangers tienen su propio grupo en ICANN, a > través del ccNSO. Yo estoy de acuerdo que el ccNSO es la fuente principal > de desarrollo de política para los temas de referencia, tanto al primer > como al segundo nivel. Con todo respeto no considero apropiado que sea ALAC > y/o LACRALO quien deba tomar posición a favor o en contra de la entre los > Gobiernos y los respectivos gestores de los ccTLD. Croe que eso es tema a > dilucidar entre el ccNSO y el GAC, donde actualmente se discuten esos temas > (tanto el CWG ccNSO GNSO on the Use of Country an Territory Names, como el > WG del GAC on Geographic Names). El hecho de que los Gobiernos de la región > LAC no hayan hecho caso al llamado respectivo es de por si ya muy > preocupante. Yo solo sugiero conocer y considerar primero las posiciones y > esfuerzos respectivos, comentando directamente tanto a los reportes del GAC > como del ccNSO en los procesos de consulta publica, antes de adelantar > nuestra opinion basados en la carta de LACTLD solamente. > Respetuosamente > Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez > +506 8837 7176 > Skype: carlos.raulg > Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) > On 27 Oct 2016, at 17:39, Aida Noblia wrote: > > Respecto al GAC, en la reunión de Junio pasado en Helsinki se llegó al > acuerdo que para poder ser usados los códigos de 2 caracteres de país en el > segundo nivel, más allá que un país no haya expresado su preferencia, la > falta de respuesta no indica consentimiento. El consentimiento para el uso > de estos dos caracteres debe ser expreso por parte de los países. Por lo > tanto mientras no lo haga no pueden usarse esos códigos. La declaración de > LACTLD menciona que se debería solicitar en este caso no solo el > consentimiento del país sino el del Administrador respectivo, para mayor > garantía de los usuarios finales. > > > > Saludos > > > 2016-10-27 9:16 GMT-03:00 <crg(a)isoc-cr.org>: > >> >> [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] >> >> Asunto: Fwd: Los informes de la GTC sobre el uso de nombres de países y >> Territorio como dominios de primer nivel >> De: crg(a)isoc-cr.org >> >> Estimados, >> >> >> en los links adjuntos pueden ver los Avances de el ccNSO GNSO-GTC-El uso >> de >> Nombres de países y territorios. De Creo Que ESTOS Documentos Relevantes >> hijo >> para la Difusión con LACTLD, AUNQUE Se Trata solo de Nombres de Países >> Territorios y al Primer Nivel. >> >> >> Gracias y saludos >> >> >> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez >> +506 8837 7176 >> Skype: carlos.raulg >> desplazamiento UTC actual: -6.00 (Costa Rica) >> Mensaje reenviado: >> >> >> > From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> >> > To: gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org <gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org> >> > Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Reports from the CWG on Use of Country and >> > Territory Names as TLDs >> > Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:12:11 +0000 >> > >> > Dear WG Members, >> > >> > Of particular interest to sub team 2 in its work on reserved names, >> > but possibly others as well â€“ >> > >> > The CWG on Use of Country and Territory Names as TLDs has released two >> > reports in advance of ICANN57: >> > >> > - A progress report discussing the groupâ€™s work to date and >> > outlining recommendations for future work >> > >> > - A draft of the CWGâ€™s Interim Report, which will be >> > subject to public comment before becoming the groupâ€™s Final Report >> > >> > Both reports are attached and available at >> > https://community.icann.org/display/CWGOUCNT/Output+and+Draft+Documents >> > . >> > >> > Kind regards, >> > Emily >> > >> > Emily Barabas | Policy Specialist >> > ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers >> > Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list >> > Gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org >> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg >> >> >> >> >> [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/64b5566fbc.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ??????? = Utf-8 Los_informes_de_la_GTC_sobre_el_uso_de q = q = utf-8 _nombres_de_pa = C3 = ADses_y_Territorio_como_dominios_de_primer_ni = = utf-8 q vel =?????
by crg＠isoc-cr.org Oct. 28, 2016

Oct. 28, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:??????? = Utf-8 Los_informes_de_la_GTC_sobre_el_uso_de q = q = utf-8 _nombres_de_pa = C3 = ADses_y_Territorio_como_dominios_de_primer_ni = = utf-8 q vel =????? Desde: crg(a)isoc-cr.org Thank you for your excellent Aida clarification. My position is that mangers have their own group ccTLDs in ICANN, ccNSO through. I agree that the ccNSO is the source main policy development for reference topics, both the first and the second level. With all due respect I do not consider appropriate it ALAC and / or LACRALO who must take a position for or against of between governments and the respective managers of ccTLDs. croe that is subject to elucidate between the ccNSO and the GAC, which currently these issues (both CWG ccNSO GNSO on the Use of Country discuss an Territory Names such as GAC WG on Geographic Names). The fact of the governments of the LAC region have ignored the call concerned is itself already very worrying.I only suggest know and first consider the respective positions and efforts, commenting reports directly to both the GAC and the ccNSO processes public consultation before advancing our opinion based on LACTLD letter only. Respectfully Carlos Raul Gutierrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current offset UTC: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On October 27, 2016, at 17:39, Aida Noblia wrote: > Respecto al GAC, en la reunión de Junio pasado en Helsinki se llegó > al > acuerdo que para poder ser usados los códigos de 2 caracteres de > país en el > segundo nivel, más allá que un país no haya expresado su > preferencia, la > falta de respuesta no indica consentimiento. El consentimiento para el > uso > de estos dos caracteres debe ser expreso por parte de los países. > Por lo > tanto mientras no lo haga no pueden usarse esos códigos. La > declaración de > LACTLD menciona que se debería solicitar en este caso no solo el > consentimiento del país sino el del Administrador respectivo, para > mayor > garantía de los usuarios finales. > > Saludos > > 2016-10-27 9:16 GMT-03:00 <crg(a)isoc-cr.org>: > >> >> [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] >> >> Asunto: Fwd: Los informes de la GTC sobre el uso de nombres de >> países y >> Territorio como dominios de primer nivel >> De: crg(a)isoc-cr.org >> >> Estimados, >> >> >> en los links adjuntos pueden ver los Avances de el ccNSO GNSO-GTC-El >> uso >> de >> Nombres de países y territorios. De Creo Que ESTOS Documentos >> Relevantes >> hijo >> para la Difusión con LACTLD, AUNQUE Se Trata solo de Nombres de >> Países >> Territorios y al Primer Nivel. >> >> >> Gracias y saludos >> >> >> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez >> +506 8837 7176 >> Skype: carlos.raulg >> desplazamiento UTC actual: -6.00 (Costa Rica) >> Mensaje reenviado: >> >> >>> From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> >>> To: gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org <gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org> >>> Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Reports from the CWG on Use of Country >>> and >>> Territory Names as TLDs >>> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:12:11 +0000 >>> >>> Dear WG Members, >>> >>> Of particular interest to sub team 2 in its work on reserved names, >>> but possibly others as well â€“ >>> >>> The CWG on Use of Country and Territory Names as TLDs has released >>> two >>> reports in advance of ICANN57: >>> >>> - A progress report discussing the groupâ€™s work to >>> date and >>> outlining recommendations for future work >>> >>> - A draft of the CWGâ€™s Interim Report, which will be >>> subject to public comment before becoming the groupâ€™s Final >>> Report >>> >>> Both reports are attached and available at >>> https://community.icann.org/display/CWGOUCNT/Output+and+Draft+Documents >>> . >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Emily >>> >>> Emily Barabas | Policy Specialist >>> ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers >>> Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list >>> Gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg >> >> >> >> >> [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/a001304f1a.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] = utf-8 Los_informes_de_la_GTC_sobre_el_uso_de q = q = utf-8 _nombres_de_pa = C3 = ADses_y_Territorio_como_dominios_de_pr = = utf-8 imer_nivel q =????????????
by aidanoblia＠gmail.com Oct. 27, 2016

Oct. 27, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: = utf-8 Los_informes_de_la_GTC_sobre_el_uso_de q = q = utf-8 _nombres_de_pa = C3 = ADses_y_Territorio_como_dominios_de_pr = = utf-8 imer_nivel q =???????????? Desde: aidanoblia(a)gmail.com Regarding the GAC at the meeting last June in Helsinki was reached agreement to be used 2-character codes in the country second level, beyond which a country has not expressed a preference, the lack of response does not indicate consent. Consent to Use these two characters should I be expressed by the countries. For the So until you do these codes can not be used. The statement LACTLD mentioned that should apply in this case not only the consent of the respective country but the Manager, for more guarantee end users. regards 27/10/2016 9:16 GMT-03: 00 <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> : > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto: Fwd: Los informes de la GTC sobre el uso de nombres de países y > Territorio como dominios de primer nivel > De: crg(a)isoc-cr.org > > Estimados, > > > en los links adjuntos pueden ver los Avances de el ccNSO GNSO-GTC-El uso > de > Nombres de países y territorios. De Creo Que ESTOS Documentos Relevantes > hijo > para la Difusión con LACTLD, AUNQUE Se Trata solo de Nombres de Países > Territorios y al Primer Nivel. > > > Gracias y saludos > > > Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez > +506 8837 7176 > Skype: carlos.raulg > desplazamiento UTC actual: -6.00 (Costa Rica) > Mensaje reenviado: > > > > From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> > > To: gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org <gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org> > > Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Reports from the CWG on Use of Country and > > Territory Names as TLDs > > Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:12:11 +0000 > > > > Dear WG Members, > > > > Of particular interest to sub team 2 in its work on reserved names, > > but possibly others as well â€“ > > > > The CWG on Use of Country and Territory Names as TLDs has released two > > reports in advance of ICANN57: > > > > - A progress report discussing the groupâ€™s work to date and > > outlining recommendations for future work > > > > - A draft of the CWGâ€™s Interim Report, which will be > > subject to public comment before becoming the groupâ€™s Final Report > > > > Both reports are attached and available at > > https://community.icann.org/display/CWGOUCNT/Output+and+Draft+Documents > > . > > > > Kind regards, > > Emily > > > > Emily Barabas | Policy Specialist > > ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers > > Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 > > _______________________________________________ > > Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list > > Gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg > > > > > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0653bc3bbf.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Reports from the CWG on Use of Country and Territory Names as TLDs
by Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. Oct. 27, 2016

Oct. 27, 2016

Estimados, en los links adjuntos pueden ver los avances de el ccNSO-GNSO CWG-Use of Country and Territory Names. Creo que estos documentos son relevantes para la difusión con LACTLD, aunque se trata solo de nombres de países y territorios al primer nivel. Gracias y saludos Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) Forwarded message: > From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas(a)icann.org> > To: gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org <gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org> > Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Reports from the CWG on Use of Country and > Territory Names as TLDs > Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:12:11 +0000 > > Dear WG Members, > > Of particular interest to sub team 2 in its work on reserved names, > but possibly others as well – > > The CWG on Use of Country and Territory Names as TLDs has released two > reports in advance of ICANN57: > > - A progress report discussing the group’s work to date and > outlining recommendations for future work > > - A draft of the CWG’s Interim Report, which will be > subject to public comment before becoming the group’s Final Report > > Both reports are attached and available at > https://community.icann.org/display/CWGOUCNT/Output+and+Draft+Documents > . > > Kind regards, > Emily > > Emily Barabas | Policy Specialist > ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers > Email: emily.barabas(a)icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976 > _______________________________________________ > Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list > Gnso-newgtld-wg(a)icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ? = Iso-8859-1 Se_ampl q = EDa_el_plazo = 3A_Tome_la_E = = iso-8859-1 ncuesta_de_Revisi q = F3n_de_At-Large =??????
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org Oct. 26, 2016

Oct. 26, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:? = Iso-8859-1 Se_ampl q = EDa_el_plazo = 3A_Tome_la_E = = iso-8859-1 ncuesta_de_Revisi q = F3n_de_At-Large =?????? Desde: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org Dear, I ask you please to those not yet completed the survey, do so. It is the best way to participate and collaborate with our Region. The information provided is very important for the working group arrive at correct results. Best regards Alberto Soto Sent from my ASUS -------- Original message -------- From: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Posted: Tue, 13:17:31 -0300 October 25, 2016 To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Deadline Extended: Take the Survey At-Large Review! > > [[- Translated text (in -> en) -]] > > Asunto: Se amplía el plazo: Tome la Encuesta de Revisión de At-Large! > De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > Queridos todos, > > > En aras de la accesibilidad, ARTÍCULOS ha decidido mantener la encuesta abierta el 9 de noviembre de 2016. Esto permitirá que todos los asistentes ICANN57 la oportunidad de hacer oír su voz. Por favor, continúe para hacer publicidad de la encuesta (http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/) entre su peers- en línea y en persona. > > > == > > > Hola a todos, > > > Para Hacer La Encuesta accesible, ARTÍCULOS ha Decidido mantener la Encuesta Abierta Hasta el 9 Dictamen de Noviembre del 2016. Esto! Dara a todos Los Que asistan un ICANN57 La Oportunidad de expresar su. Por Favor continúan Promoviendo la Encuesta (http://items.fr/atlargesurvey-es/) Entre los Miembros de su comunidad en línea y en persona. > > > Atentamente, > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie peregrino, Terri Agnew y Yeşim Nazlar > El personal de políticas de ICANN en apoyo de la comunidad de alcance > > > De: El personal de ICANN At-Large <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > Fecha: Martes 13, de septiembre de, 2016 a 17:48 > Para: "lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Asunto: Tome la Encuesta de Revisión de At-Large! > > > Queridos todos, > > > Ayudar a hacer At-Large en una parte más eficiente y eficaz de la comunidad de ICANN - Todos están invitados a participar en la encuesta de opinión de alcance: http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/ > > > La Revisión de At-Large se lleva a cabo por la consultora con sede en París, ARTÍCULOS <http://www.items.fr/> que actúa como el examinador independiente. Tomando (no más de) 30 minutos para participar en la revisión a través de la encuesta en línea <http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/> será una valiosa contribución para el éxito de este proceso de revisión importante. > > > Si usted es el representante de una estructura At-Large (ALS), un participante regular en las reuniones de ICANN, una información privilegiada de ICANN o un recién llegado al mundo de la gobernanza de Internet, su opinión nos interesa! > > > ARTÍCULOS compartirán la evaluación y los resultados de la encuesta preliminar durante la Reunión ICANN57 Hyderabad.Le instamos a que llene la encuesta <http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/> a la brevedad posible, haga escuchar su voz! Esta es tu oportunidad de compartir sus puntos de vista sobre lo que funciona, lo que no funciona tan bien, y las mejoras que se podrían hacer. > > > IMPORTANTE: Si tiene una interrupción, no puede completar el formulario, asegúrese de ir a la última página y enviar el formulario por primera vez. Sus respuestas serán entonces guardan y se pueden volver en una etapa posterior, utilizando el mismo dispositivo y completar la encuesta, al hacer clic en "Enviar" una vez más. > > > == > > > Hola a todos, > > > AYUDE un Que Hacer At-Large mar En Una parte Más Eficiente y Eficaz de la comunidad de la ICANN (Corporación para la Asignación de Nombres y Números en Internet) - Todos estan invitados a Participar en la Encuesta de Revisión de At-Large: http : //items.fr/atlargesurvey-es/. > > > La Revisión de At-Large this Dirigida Por un examinador independiente, ARTÍCULOS.El tomarse (No Más de) 30 Minutos para Participar en la revisión A Través de la Encuesta en línea ahora <http://items.fr/atlargesurvey-es/> Una Valiosa constituye contribution Para El Éxito of this Importante Proceso de revisión. > > > Si Usted Es El Representante De Una Estructura de At-Large (ALS), PARTICIPANTE ONU habitual en las Reuniones de la ICANN, Alguien que Cuenta con Información privilegiada de la ICANN o de la ONU recién llegado al Mundo de la Gobernanza de Internet, ¡Su Opinión Nos Interesa! > > > ARTÍCULOS compartirá la Evaluación y Resultados Preliminares los de la Encuesta <http://items.fr/atlargesurvey-es/> Durante la Reunión n. ° 57 de la ICANN, en Hyderabad. Le alentamos un Completar la Encuesta <http://items.fr/atlargesurvey-es/> tan pronto como le resulte Posible, ¡Haga Oír Su Voz! > > > IMPORTANTE - ¡ASEGURESE DE GUARDAR SUS RESPUESTAS! Al Llegar al final de de la Encuesta No Se Olvide de Hacer clic en El Botón "presentar". Si NECESITA GUARDAR el Formulario completado parcialmente, Está Bien, Solo vaya a la última page de la Encuesta y del haga clic en "presentar".Siempre PUEDE Regresar a la Encuesta Más tarde para completarla o Modificar el párrafo SUS respuestas, Pero unicamente si ha guardado el Formulario exitosamente. Si Ud. Su navegador cierra el pecado y ahorrar respuestas Sus, las Mismas se perderán. > > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie peregrino, Terri Agnew y Yeşim Nazlar > El personal de políticas de ICANN en apoyo de la comunidad de alcance > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > Página web: atlarge.icann.org < https://atlarge.icann.org/> > Facebook: facebook.com/icannatlarge < https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> > Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> > > > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/5f3ba67541.html --]]

1 0

Deadline Extended: Take the At-Large Review Survey!
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org Oct. 25, 2016

Oct. 25, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Deadline Extended: Take the At-Large Review Survey! Desde: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Dear All, In the interest of accessibility, ITEMS has Decided to keep the survey open until 9 November 2016. This will allow everyone attending the opportunity to ICANN57 Make Their Voice Heard. Please continue to advertise the survey (http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/) amongst your peers- online and in person. == Hello everyone, To make the survey accessible, ITEMS has decided to keep the poll open until 9 November 2016. This will all attend ICANN57 the opportunity to express their opinion. Please continue to promote the survey (http://items.fr/atlargesurvey-es/) among members of the online community and in person. Best Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine, Terri Agnew and Yeşim Nazlar ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Date: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 5:48 PM To: "lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Take the At-Large Review Survey! Dear All, Help At-Large to make more efficient and effective part of the ICANN community - all are invited to take part in the At-Large Review survey: http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/ The At-Large Review is Conducted by the Paris-based consultancy firm, ITEMS <http://www.items.fr/> WHO acts as the independent examiner. Taking (no more than) 30 minutes to Participate in the review via the online survey <http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/> will be an invaluable contribution to the success of esta Important review process. Whether you are the representative of an At-Large Structure (ALS), a participant in ICANN Regular meetings, ICANN an insider or a newcomer to the world of Internet governance, review your interests us! ITEMS will share the preliminary evaluation and findings of the survey During the ICANN57 Hyderabad Meeting.We urged you to fill in the survey <http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/> at your earliest convenience, make your voice Heard! This is your opportunity to share your views on what's working, what's not working so well, and made improvements That Could be. IMPORTANT: If You have an interruption and can not complete the form make sure you go to the last page and submit the form first. Your answers will be saved and then a you can return at a later stage, using the same device, and complete the survey, clicking 'submit' once more. == Hello everyone, Help make At-Large is in a more efficient and effective part of the community of ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) - all are invited to participate in the survey Review At-Large: http : //items.fr/atlargesurvey-es/. Review At-Large is run by an independent examiner ITEMS.The take (no more than) 30 minutes to participate in the review through the online survey <http://items.fr/atlargesurvey-es/> It is a valuable contribution to the success of this important review process. If you are the representative of a Structure At-Large (ALS), a regular participant in the meetings of ICANN, someone who has insider ICANN or a newcomer to the world of Internet governance, Your opinion we are interested! ITEMS share the assessment and preliminary results of the survey <http://items.fr/atlargesurvey-es/> during the meeting n. 57 ICANN in Hyderabad. We encourage you to complete the survey <http://items.fr/atlargesurvey-es/> as soon as possible, Make your voice heard! IMPORTANT - Be sure to keep your answers! At the end of the survey do not forget to click on the "SUBMIT" button. If you need to save the partially completed form, okay, just go to the last page of the survey and click "SUBMIT".You can always return to the survey later to complete or modify your answers, but only if you have saved the form successfully. If you. Close your browser without saving your answers, they will be lost. Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine, Terri Agnew and Yeşim Nazlar ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Website: atlarge.icann.org < https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icannatlarge < https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/2b0b2e597c.html --]]

1 0

Deadline Extended: Take the At-Large Review Survey!
by ICANN At-Large Staff Oct. 25, 2016

Oct. 25, 2016

Dear All, In the interest of accessibility, ITEMS has decided to keep the survey open until 9 November 2016. This will allow everyone attending ICANN57 the opportunity to make their voice heard. Please continue to advertise the survey (http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/) amongst your peers- online and in person. == Hola a todos, Para hacer la encuesta accesible, ITEMS ha decidido mantener la encuesta abierta hasta el 9 de Noviembre del 2016. Esto dará a todos los que asistan a ICANN57 la oportunidad de expresar su opinión. Por favor continúe promoviendo la encuesta (http://items.fr/atlargesurvey-es/) entre los miembros de su comunidad online y en persona. Best regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine, Terri Agnew and Yeşim Nazlar ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Date: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 5:48 PM To: "lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Take the At-Large Review Survey! Dear All, Help make At-Large a more efficient and effective part of the ICANN community – all are invited to take part in the At-Large Review survey: http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/ The At-Large Review is conducted by the Paris-based consultancy firm, ITEMS<http://www.items.fr/> who acts as the independent examiner. Taking (no more than) 30min to participate in the review via the online survey<http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/> will be an invaluable contribution to the success of this important review process. Whether you are the representative of an At-Large structure (ALS), a regular participant in ICANN meetings, an ICANN insider or a newcomer to the world of Internet governance, your opinion interests us! ITEMS will share the preliminary evaluation and findings of the survey during the ICANN57 Hyderabad Meeting. We urge you to fill in the survey<http://items.fr/atlargesurvey/> at your earliest convenience, make your voice heard! This is your opportunity to share your views on what’s working, what’s not working so well, and improvements that could be made. IMPORTANT: If you have an interruption and cannot complete the form make sure you go to the last page and submit the form first. Your answers will then be saved and you can return at a later stage, using the same device, and complete the survey, clicking ‘submit’ once more. == Hola a todos, Ayude a hacer que At-Large sea en una parte más eficiente y eficaz de la comunidad de la ICANN (Corporación para la Asignación de Nombres y Números en Internet) – todos están invitados a participar en la encuesta de Revisión de At-Large: http://items.fr/atlargesurvey-es/. La Revisión de At-Large está dirigida por un examinador independiente, ITEMS. El tomarse (no más de) 30 minutos para participar en la revisión a través de la encuesta en línea<http://items.fr/atlargesurvey-es/> constituye una valiosa contribución para el éxito de este importante proceso de revisión. Si usted es el representante de una Estructura de At-Large (ALS), un participante habitual en las reuniones de la ICANN, alguien que cuenta con información privilegiada de la ICANN o un recién llegado al mundo de la gobernanza de Internet, ¡su opinión nos interesa! ITEMS compartirá la evaluación y los resultados preliminares de la encuesta<http://items.fr/atlargesurvey-es/> durante la reunión n.° 57 de la ICANN, en Hyderabad. Le alentamos a completar la encuesta<http://items.fr/atlargesurvey-es/> tan pronto como le resulte posible, ¡haga oír su voz! IMPORTANTE - ¡ASEGÚRESE DE GUARDAR SUS RESPUESTAS! Al llegar al final de la encuesta no se olvide de hacer clic en el botón "PRESENTAR". Si necesita guardar el formulario completado parcialmente, está bien, sólo vaya a la última página de la encuesta y haga clic en "PRESENTAR". Siempre puede regresar a la encuesta más tarde para completarla o para modificar sus respuestas, pero ÚNICAMENTE si ha guardado el formulario exitosamente. Si Ud. cierra su navegador sin guardar sus respuestas, las mismas se perderán. Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine, Terri Agnew and Yeşim Nazlar ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icannatlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] To account. CROPP - Candidacies.
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org Oct. 24, 2016

Oct. 24, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: To account. CROPP - Candidacies. Desde: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org Humberto, Maritza, we know how many are postulated ALS? Thank you very much Alberto soto -----Original message----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of myaguero(a)msn.com Posted on: Sunday, October 23, 2016 10:09 pm To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [lac-discuss-en] to account. CROPP - Candidacies. [[Translated text (in -> en) -]] Subject: To account. CROPP - Candidacies. From: myaguero(a)msn.com FYI ... Sent from my iPhone Start of forwarded message: Delaware: <jmanurojas(a)gmail.com<mailto:jmanurojas@gmail.com> > Date: October 19, 2016, 10:45:31 PET paraca: <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists. icann.org>> Cc: "myaguero(a)msn.com <mailto:myaguero@msn.com> " <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists. icann.org>> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] CROPP - Candidacies. Responder to: <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists. icann.org>> [[--Translated Text (es -> en) -]] Subject: Re: CROPP - Candidacies. From: jmanurojas(a)gmail.com <mailto:jmanurojas@gmail.com> Hello Carlos, and all stakeholders to put into practice the CROPP program, You can enter your postulacin this link: https://community.icann.org/display/croppfy17/LACRALO+DRAFTS Alli only one of the available slots is selected and fill deliberately. His pending applications, remember to apply the IGF date limit is 25 October. Cordially, Juan Manuel Rojas P. AGEIA DENSI Colombia On October 18, 2016, 24:47, Carlos Vera <cveraq(a)gmail.com<mailto:cveraq@gmail.com> > I wrote: Hello Maritza Where s applied for the IGF Mexico? regards Carlos Vera ISOC Ecuador Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smart phone. Original message, From: myaguero(a)msn.com <mailto:myaguero@msn.com> Posted: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 10:51 To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Responder to: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: [lac-discuss-en] CROPP - Candidacies. [[--Translated Text (en -> en) -]] Subject: CROPP - Nominations. From: myaguero(a)msn.com <mailto:myaguero@msn.com> Dear Community Members, The following link podrn FIND Strategic Plan LACRALO Approved: https://community.icann.org/display/croppfy17/LACRALO+ + + Extension Strategic Plan In this sense, they can apply Reminds All related event With CROPP quotas with due antelacin. In the case of people who wish to apply for IGF go to Mexico, They can submit their applications until this week. Regards, Humberto Carrasco / Maritza Aguero [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f1d3a285ff.html --]]

1 0

To consider. CROPP - Candidacies.
by myaguero＠msn.com Oct. 24, 2016

Oct. 24, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: To consider. CROPP - Candidacies. Desde: myaguero(a)msn.com Fyi ... Sent from my iPhone Start of forwarded message: From: <jmanurojas(a)gmail.com<mailto:jmanurojas@gmail.com> > Date: October 19, 2016, 10:45:31 PET For: <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Cc: "myaguero(a)msn.com <mailto:myaguero@msn.com> " <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] CROPP - Candidacies. Answer to: <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> > [[Translated text (es -> en) -]] Subject: Re: CROPP - Candidacies. From: jmanurojas(a)gmail.com <mailto:jmanurojas@gmail.com> Hello Carlos, and all stakeholders to Implement the program CROPP, They can enter Their postulation this link: https://community.icann.org/display/croppfy17/LACRALO+DRAFTS Alli only select one of the available slots and deliberately fill. Were Their applications pending, remember to apply the IGF the deadline is October 25. cordially, Juan Manuel Rojas P. AGEIA DENSI Colombia On October 18, 2016, 24:47, Carlos Vera <cveraq(a)gmail.com<mailto:cveraq@gmail.com> > Wrote: Hello Maritza where it is applied to the IGF Mexico? regards Carlos Vera ISOC Ecuador Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. Original message From: myaguero(a)msn.com <mailto:myaguero@msn.com> Posted: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 10:51 To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Reply to: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: [lac-discuss-en] CROPP - Candidacies. [[Translated text (in -> en) -]] Subject: CROPP - Nominations. From: myaguero(a)msn.com <mailto:myaguero@msn.com> Dear Community Members, The following link podrn FIND Strategic Plan LACRALO Approved: https://community.icann.org/display/croppfy17/LACRALO+ + + Strategic Outreach Plan In this sense, they can apply Reminds All related event with CROPP quotas with due antelacin. In the case of people who wish to apply for IGF go to Mexico, They can submit their applications until this week. Regards, Humberto Carrasco / Maritza Aguero [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/708c9e08da.html --]]

1 0