March 2016 - lac-discuss-en

DNS WOMEN - MArrakech
by Vanda Scartezini March 4, 2016

March 4, 2016

Dear Women in this community.. If you are attending Marrakech ICANN meeting in Marrakech, remember DNS WOMEN BREAKFAST at ICANN meeting will take place at Jardain Andalouss , inside Venue Complex, Monday March 7th at SEVEN AM = 7AM .. In the morning… We all know is quite early but the week here is very very busy and the only slot we can have being capable to have more women is Monday early in the morning… Hope you, women reading this , being at Marrakech, please join us !!! Vanda Scartezini DNS Women WHATTSAPP - + 55 11 98181-1464. Access!! Kiss to all

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] lac-discuss-en Digest, Vol 91, Issue 12
by marcellus Jean Bernard March 4, 2016

March 4, 2016

I also welcome the decision of the procedure, the organization and the designated person. A good result of your action to diversify the presence of the poorest organizations in the Caribbean. This will foster the emergence of technology across Haiti. Moreover, Derisma Queslin will live up to respond to requirements that will be uttered by the community all times an upgrade is considered by the group leader, it is not new, it has a capacity to interact , adapt, he holds a Master's certificate in computer science at universty ESIH, It has been a member of AUF JEAN BERNARD MARCELLUS, HAITI 2016-03-03 20:47 GMT-08:00 <lac-discuss-en-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>: > Send lac-discuss-en mailing list submissions to > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > lac-discuss-en-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > lac-discuss-en-owner(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of lac-discuss-en digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Senate Letter to ICANN Chairman re China (Ron Baione) > > > ---------- Message transféré ---------- > From: Ron Baione <ron.baione(a)yahoo.com> > To: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org, > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 20:44:26 -0800 > Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Senate Letter to ICANN Chairman re China > The Senate Letter to the ICANN Chairman re China: > > > "UNITED STATES SENATE > Sen. Ted Cruz Press Office > > FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE > Cruz Press Office: 202-228-7561 > Rachael Slobodien: rachael_slobodien(a)cruz.senate.gov > Phil Novack: phil_novack(a)cruz.senate.gov > March 3, 2016 > > Cruz, Lankford, and Lee Raise New Concerns About ICANN’s Relationship with > Authoritarian China > Senators send letter to ICANN Chairman Dr. Stephen Crocker > > WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), James Lankford > (R-Okla.), and Mike Lee (R-Utah) today sent a letter to Internet > Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Chairman Dr. Stephen > Crocker, outlining new concerns that ICANN may have a direct operational > relationship with the Chinese government and its potential implications for > an Internet transition that ICANN is expected to approve in Morocco next > week. > > Today’s letter to Dr. Crocker follows a letter Cruz, Lankford, and Lee > sent to ICANN’S CEO Fadi Chehadé last month. The letter to Mr. Chehadé > stated serious concerns and requested information regarding his involvement > with the World Internet Conference, organized by the Chinese government, a > regime notorious for its censorship of the Internet and criminalization of > forms of online speech. > > “Last month, we sent you a letter stating our concerns regarding ICANN CEO > Fadi Chehadé’s participation in the Chinese-government-sponsored World > Internet Conference,” the senators wrote today. “Mr. Chehadé’s > participation resulted in an agreement to co-chair a high-level advisory > committee for the conference, which could make ICANN complicit in the > Chinese censorship regime. Since sending our letter, additional evidence > has come to light suggesting that ICANN’s relationship with the Chinese > government may be a systemic problem within the organization itself and not > limited to a single individual.” > > Read the latest letter from Sens. Cruz, Lankford, and Lee to ICANN > officials in its entirety here and below: > > > March 3, 2016 > > > Dr. Stephen D. Crocker > Chairman of the Board of Directors > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 30 > Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 > > > Dear Dr. Crocker, > > Last month, we sent you a letter stating our concerns regarding ICANN CEO > Fadi Chehadé’s participation in the Chinese-government-sponsored World > Internet Conference. Mr. Chehadé’s participation resulted in an agreement > to co-chair a high-level advisory committee for the conference, which could > make ICANN complicit in the Chinese censorship regime. Since sending our > letter, additional evidence has come to light suggesting that ICANN’s > relationship with the Chinese government may be a systemic problem within > the organization itself and not limited to a single individual. > > A review of the past few years reveals that ICANN may have a direct > operational relationship with the Chinese government. As you know, in April > 2013, ICANN hosted its 46th public meeting in Beijing. According to your > remarks, one of the hosts of ICANN’s meeting was Mr. Shang Bing, Vice > Minister of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. As you > must be aware, the Chinese government’s Ministry of Industry and > Information Technology (MIIT) is not only a central component of China’s > censorship regime, but it has pressured American companies such as IBM, > Microsoft, and Apple to reveal their products’ proprietary source code to > ministry officials. Just recently, MIIT issued new regulations that will > restrict foreign companies, including those based in the United States, > from sharing digital content ranging from text to games to video. > > Nevertheless, ICANN CEO Fadi Chehadé stated in his opening remarks, “China > is going to be a central part of where the Internet community, as we know > it, is heading. And, therefore, in my clear discussions with the local > responsible ministers, that from ICANN’s standpoint, engagement with China > is not an option. It is not an option. If we do not engage with China at > every level of our community, we, frankly, lose a part of our global > legitimacy. We must and we will. And that’s why we’re here today.” > > In addition, ICANN announced during the meeting that it would open its > first global engagement office in Beijing, which would be undertaken by the > China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC)—an organization that has > not only helped implement Chinese censorship but is led by the Director of > the Bureau of Telecommunications Regulation which is a part of MIIT.At the > time of the announcement, Madame HU Qiheng, Honorary Chairman of CNNIC’s > Steering Committee stated that the “ICANN Engagement Center-Beijing would > be not only a new link for ICANN to better develop and promote China's > Internet community, but also a new platform for China's Internet community > to better contribute to the development of the global Internet.” > > The establishment of an official ICANN office in Beijing is extremely > concerning and should have raised red flags within the United States > Government. Especially considering CNNIC’s statement that it would “invest > necessary human and material resources in the construction of the center > and actively carry out its functions including the coordination, > communication, as well as operation in order to provide effective, > long-term and stable services for ICANN to serve China’s Internet industry.” > > To further put this decision into context, at the time of the > announcement, Freedom House, an independent watchdog organization dedicated > to the expansion of freedom and democracy around the world, ranked China in > their report “Freedom on the Net 2013” just above Iran and Cuba on Internet > freedom. And since ICANN opened its Engagement Center in Beijing, China’s > record on Internet freedom has declined and was ranked last in the world in > 2015. > > The following year, in June 2014, just three months after the Obama > Administration announced its intent to transition key Internet domain name > functions away from United States oversight, ICANN held its 50th public > meeting in London, England. During the meeting, ICANN invited Lu Wei, > Minister of the Cyberspace Administration of China, to provide an address > during the opening ceremony. According to his official resume, Lu Wei also > serves as the vice chair of the Central Propaganda Department.” The > Chinese government also announced in December 2014 that Lu Wei would become > the new chairperson of CNNIC—the very organization that had claimed to be > operating ICANN’s global engagement office in Beijing. Given Wei’s central > role within the Chinese government, it is not surprising that he supports > the Obama Administration’s plan to end United States Government oversight > and further globalize ICANN. > > Repeating a similar pattern to the 2013 meeting in Beijing, ICANN once > again chose to further align itself with the Chinese government. During > the London meeting, ICANN announced that it had signed a Memorandum of > Understanding with the China Academy of Telecommunication Research (CATR), > which is a unit of MIIT and is the official think tank of the Chinese > government. In the announcement, ICANN CEO Fadi Chehadé stated, “This > marks another milestone in ICANN's globalization efforts after we > established our first engagement center in Beijing last April….This > partnership is a testament to how China—a country with over one fifth of > the global Internet population and a vibrant Internet industry—can engage > and contribute in the ICANN global community.” A few of the stated > objectives of the Memorandum of Understanding are to promote the Chinese > community’s participation in ICANN, align academic and public research, and > improve ICANN’s communication with Chinese communities and deepen the > understanding of ICANN by the Chinese government, media and, industry. > > This history leads us to a more recent issue that is currently under > consideration by ICANN. XYZ.COMLLC (“XYZ”), a U.S. based registry operator, > has submitted a Registry Services Evaluation Policy (RSEP) request to ICANN > seeking approval to become the first foreign registry to operate within > China. If ICANN’s Board of Directors approves this request, it will allow > XYZ to become a complicit actor with China’s censorship regime. > > For example, XYZ will have to comply with Article 27 of Chinese Internet > domain name regulations, China’s Constitution, and all other applicable > laws, rules, and administrative regulations pertaining to Internet domain > names. According to Article 27, any domain name registered or used by any > organization or individual shall not include content that “are against the > basic principles prescribed in the Constitution; jeopardize national > security, leak state secrets, intend to overturn the government or disrupt > of state integrity; harm national honor and national interests; instigate > hostility or discrimination between different nationalities, or disrupt the > national solidarity; violate the state religion policies or propagate cult > and feudal superstition; spread rumors, disturb public order or disrupt > social stability; spread pornography, obscenity, gambling, violence, > homicide, terror or instigate crimes; insult, libel against others and > infringe other people’s legal rights and interests; or other contents > prohibited in laws, rules and administrative regulations.” > > Furthermore, XYZ will also have to comply with Article 34 and Article 35 > of the Chinese Internet domain name regulations. Article 34 states that, > “[i]n case the domain name is in violation of the provisions and the > relevant laws and regulations,” XYZ “shall delete it and notify the domain > name holder in written form.” Additionally, Article 35 states the > requirement that “Domain Name Registry and Domain Name Registrars have the > obligation of conducting website inspection in concert with the national > governing departments, and request to suspend or cease the resolution > service of the domain name concerned.” > > There is additional concern within ICANN’s Generic Names Supporting > Organization (“Business Constituency”), the business constituency group > which represents commercial users of the Internet within ICANN. The > Business Constituency has raised concerns that aspects of XYZ’s RSEP are > too vague and need additional clarification. For example, the term “Chinese > registrant” is too broad and could be interpreted to allow the > extraterritorial application of Chinese censorship law to include residents > of Hong Kong, a special administrative region within the People’s Republic > of China. The Business Constituency also emphasized that > “government-sponsored censorship of domain names for political purposes > undermines a stable Internet ecosystem that promotes end-user confidence as > a safe place to conduct business. It also limits the free flow of data and > information, on which business users of the Internet rely in delivering > services to end users.” > > We know that XYZ will comply with Chinese law. Indeed, it affirmed this > commitment in its initial RSEP, which was filed with ICANN on October 9, > 2015. Even though this RSEP was pulled at a later date, it described how a > registry operator must comply with foreign laws. In the RSEP, XYZ stated, > “if we receive a specific notification that the registration of the name is > illegal in China, we will treat it the same as we treat any notification > from any other government that a registration is illegal. Specifically, we > will cancel the registration pursuant to our anti-abuse policies which > allow us to‘cancel, ...any registration or transaction ... to comply with > any applicable laws, government rules or requirements, requests of law > enforcement, or any dispute resolution process.’ This is identical to our > current treatment of complaints from governments about illegal domain name > registrations.” > > It is deeply troubling that ICANN would put registry operators in a > position of becoming an actor within the Chinese censorship regime. There > is concern that this action could be an example of ICANN’s desire to build > a close relationship with the Chinese government which could continue to > move in a troubling direction once the United States Government ends its > oversight. These concerns were recently confirmed by a member of the > Non-Connected Party House’s (NCPH) Commercial Stakeholder Group who > participated in a meeting with ICANN in February 2016 and stated, “The > ICANN board wants to engage more with China and India following the IANA > transition, which somewhat explains the board’s decision not to take action > against Chehadé.” > > In order to gain a better understanding of the potential implications of > ICANN’s relationship with the Chinese government and its impact on the > Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) transition, we request that you > provide a response to the following questions as soon as possible, but no > later than 9:00 a.m. on Friday, March 11, 2016. > > 1. Please state when you first learned that ICANN CEO Fadi Chehadé > had agreed to co-chair a high-level advisory committee for the Chinese > government’s state-sponsored World Internet Conference. > > a. Please provide a yes-or-no answer to the following question: Did > you agree with Fadi Chehadé’s decision to co-chair a high level advisory > committee for the World Internet Conference? > > b. Did ICANN’s Board of Directors approve of Fadi Chehadé’s decision > to co-chair a high level advisory committee for the World Internet > Conference? > > c. Did any member of ICANN’s Board of Directors ask Fadi Chehadé to > step down from his position as CEO and President of ICANN? > > d. Please provide the meeting minutes, attendance records, and all > other documents associated with ICANN’s Board of Directors’ meeting(s) with > Fadi Chehadé in which his commitment to co-chair a high level advisory > committee for the World Internet Conference was discussed. > > 2. Please provide a yes-or-no answer to the following question: It > has been reported that ICANN’s Board of Directors took no action against > Fadi Chehadé because “[t]he view eventually prevailed that no reactive > action should be taken lest China lose face.” Did ICANN refrain from taking > action against Fadi Chehadé due to concern that China may lose face? > > 3. Fadi Chehadé has been called on to recuse himself from all > discussions and negotiations pertaining to the IANA transition given a > confirmed personal conflict of interest with the Chinese government. Has > ICANN taken any action to ensure that Fadi Chade will recuse himself from > the IANA transition? If no, please describe the reason for ICANN’s inaction. > > 4. During ICANN’s 46th public meeting in Beijing, Fadi Chehadé > stated, “China is going to be a central part of where the Internet > community, as we know it, is heading. And, therefore, in my clear > discussions with the local responsible ministers, that from ICANN’s > standpoint, engagement with China is not an option. It is not an option. If > we do not engage with China at every level of our community, we, frankly, > lose a part of our global legitimacy. We must and we will. And that’s why > we’re here today.” Do you agree with the statement that ICANN will lose > part of its global legitimacy if it does not engage with China at every > level of the community? > > 5. When ICANN announced it was opening its first global engagement > office in Beijing, the China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) > stated that it would “invest necessary human and material resources in the > construction of the center and actively carry out its functions including > the coordination, communication, as well as operation in order to provide > effective, long-term and stable services for ICANN to serve China’s > Internet industry.” Please provide yes-or-no answers to the following > questions: > > a. Did CNNIC invest human and material resources in the construction > of ICANN’s global engagement office in Beijing? > > b. Is CNNIC actively carrying out the functions, coordination, > communication, or operation of ICANN’s global engagement office in Beijing? > > c. Do any individuals associated with CNNIC or the Chinese > government have a formal or informal role in ICANN’s global engagement > office in Beijing? > > 6. ICANN currently lists the address for each hub office and > engagement office on its website except for the engagement office in > Beijing. Please provide the address of ICANN’s engagement office in Beijing. > > 7. When Lu Wei, Minister of the Cyberspace Administration of China > and Incumbent Vice Minister of the Central Propaganda Department, assumed > the role of the Chairperson of CNNIC in December 2014, did ICANN take any > action to ensure that its global engagement office in Beijing was not being > used to carry out censorship for the Chinese government? > > 8. Do you agree with the Business Constituency’s concern that the > term “Chinese registrant” in XYZ’s RSEP is too broad and could be > interpreted to allow the extraterritorial application of Chinese censorship > law to include residents of Hong Kong? > > 9. Do you agree that approval of XYZ’s RSEP will place XYZ in a > position of having to comply with government-sponsored censorship of domain > names for political purposes, which will undermine a stable Internet > ecosystem? > > 10. A member of the Non-Connected Party House’s (NCPH) Commercial > Stakeholder Group recently stated, “The ICANN board wants to engage more > with China and India following the IANA transition, which somewhat explains > the board’s decision not to take action against Chehadé.” > > a. Please describe ICANN’s plans for engagement with China following > a potential IANA transition. > > b. Did ICANN’s post IANA transition plans with China play any role in > the decision not to take action against Fadi Chehadé? > > We appreciate your cooperation in this very important matter and look > forward to your response at the stated date and time. Please contact Sean > McLean (Senator Cruz), Sarah Seitz (Senator Lankford), and Christy Knese > (Senator Lee) of our staffs if there are any questions regarding this > request. > > Sincerely, > > [Signed by Senators Cruz, Lee and Lankford] > > > cc: Mr. Fadi Chehadé, Chief Executive Officer, Internet Corporation for > Assigned Names and Numbers > > The Honorable Lawrence E. Strickling, Assistant Secretary for > Communications and Information, U.S. Department of Commerce" > > Ron > > ------------------------------ > * From: * crg(a)isoc-cr.org <crg(a)isoc-cr.org>; > * To: * <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>; > * Cc: * LACRALO list <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>; > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org < > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>; > * Subject: * Re: [lac-discuss-en] SPACE LAC invitation & schedule > * Sent: * Fri, Feb 26, 2016 5:38:43 PM > > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Re: SPACE LAC invitation & schedule > from: crg(a)isoc-cr.org > > On Monday I guess? > I can not read QR ...... with my eyes yet. > > > Carlos Raul Gutierrez > +506 8837 7176 > Skype: carlos.raulg > Current offset UTC: -6.00 (Costa Rica) > On February 26, 2016, at 11:13 Scartezini Vanda wrote: > > > > Remember that there will be remote participation as all other session > > during ICANN meeting !! > > [cid:325DC01B-5F5B-4936-9CF0-44D2E5172EE7] > > > > Vanda Scartezini > > Polo Consultores Associados > > Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 > > 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil > > Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 > > Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 > > Sorry for any typos. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-es mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > [[--Original text (es) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/7c6be9844f.html > --]] > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > >

2 1

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Letter to ICANN Chairman Senate re China
by vanda＠scartezini.org March 4, 2016

March 4, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Letter to ICANN Chairman Senate re China from: vanda(a)scartezini.org Thanks to God was not this guy WHO won the indication to run for presidency, was not that much better WHO won one ... but His. Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, 1004 cj 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. From: "lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> "On Behalf Of" lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> " Reply-To: Ron Baione Date: Friday, March 4, 2016 at 1:44 a.m. To: LACRALO list, LACRALO list Cc: LACRALO list, "lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> " Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Letter to ICANN Chairman Senate re China The Senate Letter to the ICANN Chairman re China: "UNITED STATES SENATE Sen. Ted Cruz Press Office FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Cruz Press Office: 202-228-7561 Rachael Slobodien: rachael_slobodien(a)cruz.senate.gov <mailto:rachael_slobodien@cruz.senate.gov> Phil Novack: phil_novack(a)cruz.senate.gov <mailto:phil_novack@cruz.senate.gov> March 3, 2016 Cruz, Lankford, and Lee Raise New Concerns About Authoritarian ICANN's Relationship With China Senators send letter to ICANN Chairman Dr. Stephen Crocker WASHINGTON, DC -. (. R-Okla) US Sens Ted Cruz (R-Texas), James Lankford, and Mike Lee (R-Utah) today sent a letter to the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Chairman Dr. Stephen Crocker, ICANN outlining new Concerns That May Have a direct operational relationship with the Chinese government and Its Implications for an Internet potential That transition is expected to approve ICANN in Morocco next week. Today's letter to Dr. Crocker Follows a letter Cruz, Lankford, and Lee sent to ICANN Fadi Chehade'S CEO last month. The letter to Mr.Stated Chehade serious Requested Information Regarding Concerns and His Involvement With The World Internet Conference, organized by the Chinese government, a regime notorious for censorship of the Internet ITS and criminalization of forms of online speech. "Last month, we sent you a letter Stating our Concerns Regarding ICANN Fadi Chehade CEO's participation in the Chinese-government-sponsored World Internet Conference," the senators wrote today. "Mr. Resulted Chehade's participation in an agreement to co-chair a high-level advisory committee for the conference, Which Could make ICANN complicit in the Chinese censorship regime. Since sending our letter, additional evidence has come to light suggesting That ICANN's relationship With the Chinese government May be a systemic problem Within the organization itself and not limited to individual single. " . Read the latest letter from Sens Cruz, Lankford, and Lee to ICANN Officials in Its entirety here and below: March 3, 2016 Dr. Stephen D.Crocker Chairman of the Board of Directors Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 30 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Dear Dr. Crocker, Last month, we sent you a letter Stating our Concerns Regarding ICANN Fadi Chehade CEO's participation in the Chinese-government-sponsored Internet World Conference. Mr. Chehade's participation Resulted in an agreement to co-chair a high-level advisory committee for the conference, Which Could make ICANN complicit in the Chinese censorship regime. Since sending our letter, additional evidence has come to light suggesting That ICANN's relationship With the Chinese government May be a systemic problem Within the organization itself and not limited to individual single. A review of the past few years reveals ICANN That May Have a direct operational relationship With the Chinese government. As you know, in April 2013, ICANN public meeting hosted ITS 46th in Beijing. According to your remarks, one of the hosts of ICANN's meeting was Mr. Shang Bing, Vice Minister of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology.As you must be aware, the Chinese government's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) is not only central component of China's censorship regime, but it has pressured American companies: such as IBM, Microsoft, and Apple to reveal Their products' proprietary source Officials ministry to code. Just recently, MIIT issued new regulations will restrict foreign companies That, Including Those based in the United States, from sharing digital content ranging from text to video to games. NEVERTHELESS, ICANN CEO Fadi Chehade Stated in His opening remarks, "China is going to be the central part of the Internet community Where, as we know it, is heading. And, Therefore, in my clear discussions With the Local responsible Ministers, That from ICANN's standpoint, China is not engagement With an option. It is not an option. If we do not engage With China at every level of our community, we, frankly, lose a part of our overall legitimacy. We must and we will. And that's why we're here today. " In Addition, ICANN During the meeting Announced That it would open first engagement ITS Global office in Beijing, Which would be Undertaken by the China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) -an organization That has not only censorship but Chinese Helped Implement is led by the Director of the Bureau of Telecommunications Regulation Which is a part of MIIT.At the time of the announcement, Madame HU Qiheng, Honorary Chairman of CNNIC's Steering Committee Stated That the "ICANN Engagement Center-Beijing would be not only a new link for ICANN to better Develop and Promote China's Internet community, but Also a new platform for China's Internet community to better Contribute to the development of the global Internet. " The establishment of an official ICANN office in Beijing is extremely Concerning and raised red flags Should Have Within the United States Government. Especially Considering CNNIC's statement That it would "invest Necessary human and materials resources in the construction of the center and Actively carry out ITS functions Including the coordination, communication, as well as operation in order to Provide effective, long-term and stable services for ICANN China's Internet to serve industry. " To further put esta decision into context, at the time of the announcement, Freedom House, an independent watchdog organization dedicated to the expansion of freedom and democracy around the world, RANKED China in Their report "Freedom on the Net 2013" just above Iran and Cuba on Internet freedom. And since ICANN ITS Engagement Center opened in Beijing, China's record on Internet freedom has Declined RANKED and was last in the world in 2015. The following year, in June 2014, just three months after the Obama Administration Announced intent to transition ITS Internet domain name key functions away from United States oversight, ICANN public meeting held ITS 50th in London, England. During the meeting, ICANN invited Lu Wei, Minister of the Cyberspace Administration of China, to Provide an address During the opening ceremony. According To His official resume, Lu Wei Also Serves as the vice chair of the Central Propaganda Department. "The Chinese government Also Announced in December 2014 That Lu Wei would Become the new chairperson of CNNIC-the very organization That HAD Claimed to be operating ICANN's Global engagement office in Beijing.Given Wei's main role Within the Chinese government, it is not surprising That've supports the Obama Administration's plan to end United States Government oversight and further globalize ICANN. Repeating a pattern similarly to the 2013 meeting in Beijing, Once Again ICANN chose to further align itself With the Chinese government. During the London meeting, ICANN Announced That It had signed a Memorandum of Understanding With the China Academy of Telecommunication Research (CATR), Which is a unit of MIIT and is the official think tank of the Chinese government. In the announcement, ICANN CEO Fadi Chehade Stated, "This marks another milestone in ICANN's globalization Efforts after we established our first engagement center in Beijing last April ... .This partnership is a testament to how China-a country With over one fifth of the global the Internet population and a vibrant Internet industry-can engage and Contribute in the ICANN the global community. "a few of the Stated Objectives of the Memorandum of Understanding are to Promote the Chinese community's participation in ICANN, align academic and public research, and improve increase ICANN's communication With Chinese Communities and deepen the understanding of ICANN by the Chinese government, media and, industry. This history leads us to a more recent issue That Is Currently under consideration by ICANN. XYZ.COMLLC ( "XYZ"), a US based registry operator, you Submitted to Registry Services Evaluation Policy (RSEP) seeking approval request to ICANN to Become the first foreign registry to operate Within China. If ICANN's Board of Directors Approves esta request, it will allow XYZ to Become a performer With China's complicit censorship regime. For example, XYZ will Have to Comply with Article 27 of Chinese Internet domain name regulations, China's Constitution, and all other applicable laws, rules, and regulations pertaining to administrative Internet domain names.According To Article 27, any domain name registered or used by any organization or individually Shall not include content That "Against the basic principles are prescribed in the Constitution; jeopardize national security, leak state secrets, intend to overturn the government or disrupt of state integrity; harm national honor and national interests; instigate hostility or discrimination Between different nationalities, or disrupt the national solidarity; violate the state religion policies or propagate cult and feudal superstition; spread rumors, disturb public order or disrupt social stability; spread pornography, obscenity, gambling, violence, homicide, terror or instigate crimes; insult, libel Against others and infringe other people's legal righ ts and interests; or other contents prohibited in laws, rules and administrative regulations. " Furthermore, XYZ will Also have to Comply with Article 34 and Article 35 of the Chinese Internet domain name regulations.Article 34 states That, "[i] n case the domain name is in violation of the Provisions and the Relevant laws and regulations," XYZ "shall delete it and notify the domain name holder in written form." Additionally, Article 35 states the That requirement "Domain Name Registry and Domain Name Registrars Have the obligation of conducting inspection website in concert with the national governing Departments, and request to suspend or cease the resolution of the domain name service concerned." There is additional concern ICANN's Generic Names Within Supporting Organization ( "Business Constituency"), the business constituency group Which dealer to commercial users of the Internet Within ICANN. The Business Constituency has raised Concerns That's RSEP aspects of XYZ are too vague and need additional clarification. For example, the term "Chinese registrant" is too broad and Could Be Interpreted to allow the extraterritorial application of Chinese censorship law to include residents of Hong Kong, a special administrative region Within the People's Republic of China.The Business Constituency Also emphasized That "government-sponsored censorship of domain names for political purposes undermines a stable ecosystem That Internet Promotes end-user confidence as a safe place to conduct business. Also it limits the free flow of data and information, on Which business users of the Internet rely in delivering services to end users. " We Know That XYZ will Comply with Chinese law. Indeed, it Affirmed in Its initial commitment esta RSEP, Which was filed on ICANN With October 9, 2015. Even though esta RSEP was pulled at a later date, it Described how to registry operator must Comply with foreign laws. In the RSEP, XYZ Stated, "if we receive a specific notification That the registration of the name is illegal in China, we will treat it the same as we treat any notification from any other government That a registration is illegal. Specifically, we will cancel the registration pursuant to our anti-abuse policies Which allow us to'cancel, ... any registration or transaction ... to Comply with any applicable laws, government rules or requirements, requests of law enforcement, or any dispute resolution process. ' This is identical to our current treatment of complaints from Governments acerca illegal domain name registrations. " It is deeply troubling That would put ICANN registry operators in a position of becoming an Actor Within the Chinese censorship regime. There is concern That this action Could be an example of ICANN's desire to build a close relationship With the Chinese government Which Could continue to move in a troubling direction eleven the United States Government ends ITS oversight. These Concerns Were recently confirmed by a member of the Non-Connected Party House's (NCPH) Commercial Stakeholder Group WHO participated in a Meeting with ICANN in February 2016 and Stated, "The ICANN board wants to engage more With China and India following the IANA transition , Which Explains the somewhat board's decision not to take action Against Chehade. " In order to gain a better understanding of the potential implicaciones of ICANN's relationship With the Chinese government and Its Impact on the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) transition, we request that you 'Provide a response to the following questions as soon as possible, but no later than 9:00 a.m. on Friday, March 11, 2016. 1.Please state When you first ICANN CEO Learned Fadi Chehade That HAD Agreed to co-chair a high-level advisory committee for the Chinese government's state-sponsored World Internet Conference. to. Please provide a yes-or-no answer to the following question: Did you Fadi Chehade's Agree with decision to co-chair a high level advisory committee for the World Internet Conference? b. Did ICANN's Board of Directors Fadi Chehade's approve of decision to co-chair a high level advisory committee for the World Internet Conference? c. Did any member of ICANN's Board of Directors Fadi Chehade ask to step down from His position as CEO and President of ICANN? d. Please provide the meeting minutes, attendance records, and all other documents Associated With ICANN's Board of Directors' meeting (s) with Fadi Chehade in Which His commitment to co-chair a high level advisory committee for the World Internet Conference was discussed. 2.Please provide a yes-or-no answer to the following question: It Has Been Reported That ICANN's Board of Directors Took no action Against Fadi Chehade Because "[t] he view Eventually prevailed That not reactive action Should be taken lest China lose face. "Did refrain from ICANN Fadi Chehade Against taking action due to concern That China May lose face? 3. Fadi Chehade has-been called on to recuse himself from all discussions and Negotiations Pertaining to the IANA transition staff Given confirmed conflict of interest With the Chinese government. ICANN have taken any action to Ensure That Fadi Chade will recuse himself from the IANA transition? If not, Please describe the reason for ICANN's inaction. 4. During ICANN's 46th public meeting in Beijing, Fadi Chehade Stated, "China is going to be the central part of the Internet community Where, as we know it, is heading. And, Therefore, in my clear discussions With the Local responsible Ministers, That from ICANN's standpoint, China is not engagement With an option. It is not an option. If we do not engage With China at every level of our community, we, frankly, lose a part of our overall legitimacy.We must and we will. And that's why we're here today. "Do you Agree with the statement That ICANN will lose part of ITS Global legitimacy if it does not engage at every level With China of the community? 5. When it was opening ICANN Announced ITS Global first engagement office in Beijing, the China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) Stated That it would "invest Necessary human resources and materials in the construction of the center and carry out Actively Including the ITS functions . coordination, communication, as well as operation in order to Provide effective, long-term and stable services for ICANN to serve China's Internet industry "Please provide yes-or-no answers to the following questions: to. Did CNNIC invest human and materials resources in the construction of ICANN's overall engagement office in Beijing? b. CNNIC Is Actively carrying out the functions, coordination, communication, or operation of ICANN's overall engagement office in Beijing? c. Do any CNNIC or Individuals Associated With the Chinese government formally or informally Have a role in ICANN's overall engagement office in Beijing? 6. ICANN Currently lists the address for each office and engagement hub office on ITS website except for the engagement office in Beijing. Please provide the address of ICANN's engagement office in Beijing. 7. When Lu Wei, Minister of the Cyberspace Administration of China and Incumbent Vice Minister of the Central Propaganda Department, Assumed the role of the Chairperson of CNNIC in December 2014, ICANN did take any action to Ensure That overall ITS office in Beijing engagement was not being used to carry out censorship for the Chinese government? 8. Do you Agree with the Business Constituency's concern That the term "Chinese registrant" in XYZ's RSEP is too broad and Could Be Interpreted to allow the extraterritorial application of Chinese censorship law to include residents of Hong Kong? 9. Do you agree That's approval of XYZ XYZ RSEP will place in a position of Having to Comply with government-sponsored censorship of domain names for political purposes, Which will undermine a stable Internet ecosystem? 10.A member of the Non-Connected Party House's (NCPH) Commercial Stakeholder Group recently Stated, "The ICANN board wants to engage more With China and India following the IANA transition, Which somewhat Explains the board's decision not to take action Against Chehade." to. Please describe ICANN's plans for engagement With China following IANA potential transition. b. Did ICANN's IANA post transition plans play any role With China in the decision not to take Fadi Chehade Action Against? We appreciate your cooperation in esta Very Important matter and look forward to your response at the above stated date and time. Please contact Sean McLean (Senator Cruz), Sarah Seitz (Senator Lankford), and Christy Knese (Senator Lee) of our staffs haver any questions Regarding this Request. Sincerely, [Signed by Senators Cruz, Lee and Lankford] cc: Mr. Fadi Chehade, Chief Executive Officer Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers The Honorable Lawrence E.Strickling, Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information, US Department of Commerce " Rum ________________________________ From: crg(a)isoc-cr.org <mailto:crg@isoc-cr.org><crg(a)isoc-cr.org<mailto:crg@isoc-cr.org> >; to: <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> >; Cc: LACRALO list <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> >; lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org><lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> >; Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] SPACE LAC invitation & schedule Sent: Fri, Feb. 26, 2016 5:38:43 PM [[Translated text (es -> en) -]] Subject: Re: SPACE LAC invitation & schedule from: crg(a)isoc-cr.org <javascript:return> On Monday I guess? I can not read QR ...... with my eyes yet. Carlos Raul Gutierrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current offset UTC: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On February 26, 2016, at 11:13 Scartezini Vanda wrote: > Remember that there will be remote participation as all other session > during ICANN meeting !! > [cid:325DC01B-5F5B-4936-9CF0-44D2E5172EE7] > > Vanda Scartezini > Polo Consultores Associados > Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 > 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil > Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 > Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 > Sorry for any typos. > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<javascript:return> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <javascript:return> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/349a2c628e.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] SPACE LAC invitation & schedule
by crg＠isoc-cr.org March 4, 2016

March 4, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: SPACE LAC invitation & schedule from: crg(a)isoc-cr.org On Monday I guess? I can not read QR ...... with my eyes yet. Carlos Raul Gutierrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current offset UTC: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On February 26, 2016, at 11:13 Scartezini Vanda wrote: > Remember that there will be remote participation as all other session > during ICANN meeting !! > [cid:325DC01B-5F5B-4936-9CF0-44D2E5172EE7] > > Vanda Scartezini > Polo Consultores Associados > Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 > 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil > Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 > Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 > Sorry for any typos. > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/7c6be9844f.html --]]

3 2

Letter to ICANN Chairman Senate re China
by ron.baione＠yahoo.com March 4, 2016

March 4, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Letter to ICANN Chairman Senate re China from: ron.baione(a)yahoo.com The Senate Letter to the ICANN Chairman re China: "UNITED STATES SENATE Sen. Ted Cruz Press Office FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Cruz Press Office: 202-228-7561 Rachael Slobodien: rachael_slobodien(a)cruz.senate.gov Phil Novack: phil_novack(a)cruz.senate.gov March 3, 2016 Cruz, Lankford, and Lee Raise New Concerns About Authoritarian ICANN's Relationship With China Senators send letter to ICANN Chairman Dr. Stephen Crocker WASHINGTON, DC -. (. R-Okla) US Sens Ted Cruz (R-Texas), James Lankford, and Mike Lee (R-Utah) today sent a letter to the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Chairman Dr. Stephen Crocker, ICANN outlining new Concerns That May Have a direct operational relationship with the Chinese government and Its Implications for an Internet potential That transition is expected to approve ICANN in Morocco next week. Today's letter to Dr.Follows a letter Crocker Cruz, Lankford, and Lee sent to ICANN Fadi Chehade'S CEO last month. The letter to Mr. Chehade Stated Concerns and serious Requested Information Regarding His Involvement With The World Internet Conference, organized by the Chinese government, a regime notorious for censorship of the Internet ITS and criminalization of forms of online speech. "Last month, we sent you a letter Stating our Concerns Regarding ICANN Fadi Chehade CEO's participation in the Chinese-government-sponsored World Internet Conference," the senators wrote today. "Mr. Resulted Chehade's participation in an agreement to co-chair a high-level advisory committee for the conference, Which Could make ICANN complicit in the Chinese censorship regime. Since sending our letter, additional evidence has come to light suggesting That ICANN's relationship With the Chinese government May be a systemic problem Within the organization itself and not limited to individual single. " . Read the latest letter from Sens Cruz, Lankford, and Lee to ICANN Officials in Its entirety here and below: March 3, 2016 Dr. Stephen D.Crocker Chairman of the Board of Directors Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 30 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Dear Dr. Crocker, Last month, we sent you a letter Stating our Concerns Regarding ICANN Fadi Chehade CEO's participation in the Chinese-government-sponsored Internet World Conference. Mr. Chehade's participation Resulted in an agreement to co-chair a high-level advisory committee for the conference, Which Could make ICANN complicit in the Chinese censorship regime. Since sending our letter, additional evidence has come to light suggesting That ICANN's relationship With the Chinese government May be a systemic problem Within the organization itself and not limited to individual single. A review of the past few years reveals ICANN That May Have a direct operational relationship With the Chinese government. As you know, in April 2013, ICANN public meeting hosted ITS 46th in Beijing. According to your remarks, one of the hosts of ICANN's meeting was Mr. Shang Bing, Vice Minister of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology.As you must be aware, the Chinese government's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) is not only central component of China's censorship regime, but it has pressured American companies: such as IBM, Microsoft, and Apple to reveal Their products' proprietary source Officials ministry to code. Just recently, MIIT issued new regulations will restrict foreign companies That, Including Those based in the United States, from sharing digital content ranging from text to video to games. NEVERTHELESS, ICANN CEO Fadi Chehade Stated in His opening remarks, "China is going to be the central part of the Internet community Where, as we know it, is heading. And, Therefore, in my clear discussions With the Local responsible Ministers, That from ICANN's standpoint, China is not engagement With an option. It is not an option. If we do not engage With China at every level of our community, we, frankly, lose a part of our overall legitimacy. We must and we will.And that's why we're here today. " In Addition, ICANN During the meeting Announced That it would open first engagement ITS Global office in Beijing, Which would be Undertaken by the China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) -an organization That has not only censorship but Chinese Helped Implement is led by the Director of the Bureau of Telecommunications Regulation Which is a part of MIIT.At the time of the announcement, Madame HU Qiheng, Honorary Chairman of CNNIC's Steering Committee Stated That the "ICANN Engagement Center-Beijing would be not only a new link for ICANN to better Develop and Promote China's Internet community, but Also a new platform for China's Internet community to better Contribute to the development of the global Internet. " The establishment of an official ICANN office in Beijing is extremely Concerning and raised red flags Should Have Within the United States Government.Especially Considering CNNIC's statement That it would "invest Necessary human and materials resources in the construction of the center and Actively carry out ITS functions Including the coordination, communication, as well as operation in order to Provide effective, long-term and stable services for ICANN China's Internet to serve industry. " To further put esta decision into context, at the time of the announcement, Freedom House, an independent watchdog organization dedicated to the expansion of freedom and democracy around the world, RANKED China in Their report "Freedom on the Net 2013" just above Iran and Cuba on Internet freedom. And since ICANN ITS Engagement Center opened in Beijing, China's record on Internet freedom has Declined RANKED and was last in the world in 2015. The following year, in June 2014, just three months after the Obama Administration Announced intent to transition ITS Internet domain name key functions away from United States oversight, ICANN public meeting held ITS 50th in London, England. During the meeting, ICANN invited Lu Wei, Minister of the Cyberspace Administration of China, to Provide an address During the opening ceremony.According To His official resume, Lu Wei Also Serves as the vice chair of the Central Propaganda Department. "The Chinese government Also Announced in December 2014 That Lu Wei would Become the new chairperson of CNNIC-the very organization That HAD Claimed to be operating ICANN's Global engagement office in Beijing. Given Wei's main role Within the Chinese government, it is not surprising That've supports the Obama Administration's plan to end United States Government oversight and further globalize ICANN. Repeating a pattern similarly to the 2013 meeting in Beijing, Once Again ICANN chose to further align itself With the Chinese government. During the London meeting, ICANN Announced That It had signed a Memorandum of Understanding With the China Academy of Telecommunication Research (CATR), Which is a unit of MIIT and is the official think tank of the Chinese government.In the announcement, ICANN CEO Fadi Chehade Stated, "This marks another milestone in ICANN's globalization Efforts after we established our first engagement center in Beijing last April ... .This partnership is a testament to how China-a country With over one fifth of the global the Internet population and a vibrant Internet industry-can engage and Contribute in the ICANN the global community. "a few of the Stated Objectives of the Memorandum of Understanding are to Promote the Chinese community's participation in ICANN, align academic and public research, and improve increase ICANN's Communication with Chinese Communities and deepen the understanding of ICANN by the Chinese government, media and, industry. This history leads us to a more recent issue That Is Currently under consideration by ICANN. XYZ.COMLLC ( "XYZ"), a US based registry operator, you Submitted to Registry Services Evaluation Policy (RSEP) seeking approval request to ICANN to Become the first foreign registry to operate Within China.If ICANN's Board of Directors Approves esta request, it will allow XYZ to Become a performer With China's complicit censorship regime. For example, XYZ will Have to Comply with Article 27 of Chinese Internet domain name regulations, China's Constitution, and all other applicable laws, rules, and regulations pertaining to administrative Internet domain names.According To Article 27, any domain name registered or used by any organization or individually Shall not include content That "Against the basic principles are prescribed in the Constitution; jeopardize national security, leak state secrets, intend to overturn the government or disrupt of state integrity; harm national honor and national interests; instigate hostility or discrimination Between different nationalities, or disrupt the national solidarity; violate the state religion policies or propagate cult and feudal superstition; spread rumors, disturb public order or disrupt social stability; spread pornography, obscenity, gambling, violence, homicide, terror or instigate crimes; insult, libel Against others and infringe other people's legal rights and interests; or other contents prohibited in laws, rules and administrative regulations. " Furthermore, XYZ will Also have to Comply with Article 34 and Article 35 of the Chinese Internet domain name regulations.Article 34 states That, "[i] n case the domain name is in violation of the Provisions and the Relevant laws and regulations," XYZ "shall delete it and notify the domain name holder in written form." Additionally, Article 35 states the That requirement "Domain Name Registry and Domain Name Registrars Have the obligation of conducting inspection website in concert with the national governing Departments, and request to suspend or cease the resolution of the domain name service concerned." There is additional concern ICANN's Generic Names Within Supporting Organization ( "Business Constituency"), the business constituency group Which dealer to commercial users of the Internet Within ICANN. The Business Constituency has raised Concerns That's RSEP aspects of XYZ are too vague and need additional clarification. For example, the term "Chinese registrant" is too broad and Could Be Interpreted to allow the extraterritorial application of Chinese censorship law to include residents of Hong Kong, a special administrative region Within the People's Republic of China.The Business Constituency Also emphasized That "government-sponsored censorship of domain names for political purposes undermines a stable ecosystem That Internet Promotes end-user confidence as a safe place to conduct business. Also it limits the free flow of data and information, on Which business users of the Internet rely in delivering services to end users. " We Know That XYZ will Comply with Chinese law. Indeed, it Affirmed in Its initial commitment esta RSEP, Which was filed on ICANN With October 9, 2015. Even though esta RSEP was pulled at a later date, it Described how to registry operator must Comply with foreign laws. In the RSEP, XYZ Stated, "if we receive a specific notification That the registration of the name is illegal in China, we will treat it the same as we treat any notification from any other government That a registration is illegal. Specifically, we will cancel the registration pursuant to our anti-abuse policies Which allow us to'cancel, ... any registration or transaction ...to Comply with any applicable laws, government rules or requirements, requests of law enforcement, or any dispute resolution process. ' This is identical to our current treatment of complaints from Governments acerca illegal domain name registrations. " It is deeply troubling That would put ICANN registry operators in a position of becoming an Actor Within the Chinese censorship regime. There is concern That this action Could be an example of ICANN's desire to build a close relationship With the Chinese government Which Could continue to move in a troubling direction eleven the United States Government ends ITS oversight.These Concerns Were recently confirmed by a member of the Non-Connected Party House's (NCPH) Commercial Stakeholder Group WHO participated in a Meeting with ICANN in February 2016 and Stated, "The ICANN board wants to engage more With China and India following the IANA transition , Which Explains the somewhat board's decision not to take action Against Chehade. " In order to gain a better understanding of the potential implicaciones of ICANN's relationship With the Chinese government and Its Impact on the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) transition, we request that you 'Provide a response to the following questions as soon as possible, but no later than 9:00 a.m. on Friday, March 11, 2016. 1. Please state When you first ICANN CEO Learned Fadi Chehade That HAD Agreed to co-chair a high-level advisory committee for the Chinese government's state-sponsored World Internet Conference. to. Please provide a yes-or-no answer to the following question: Did you Fadi Chehade's Agree with decision to co-chair a high level advisory committee for the World Internet Conference? b.Did ICANN's Board of Directors Fadi Chehade's approve of decision to co-chair a high level advisory committee for the World Internet Conference? c. Did any member of ICANN's Board of Directors Fadi Chehade ask to step down from His position as CEO and President of ICANN? d. Please provide the meeting minutes, attendance records, and all other documents Associated With ICANN's Board of Directors' meeting (s) with Fadi Chehade in Which His commitment to co-chair a high level advisory committee for the World Internet Conference was discussed. 2. Please provide a yes-or-no answer to the following question: It Has Been Reported That ICANN's Board of Directors Took no action Against Fadi Chehade Because "[t] he view Eventually prevailed That not reactive action Should be taken lest China lose face. "Did refrain from ICANN Fadi Chehade Against taking action due to concern That China May lose face? 3.Fadi Chehade has-been called on to recuse himself from all discussions and Negotiations Pertaining to the IANA transition staff Given confirmed conflict of interest With the Chinese government. ICANN have taken any action to Ensure That Fadi Chade will recuse himself from the IANA transition? If not, Please describe the reason for ICANN's inaction. 4. During ICANN's 46th public meeting in Beijing, Fadi Chehade Stated, "China is going to be the central part of the Internet community Where, as we know it, is heading. And, Therefore, in my clear discussions With the Local responsible Ministers, That from ICANN's standpoint, China is not engagement With an option. It is not an option. If we do not engage With China at every level of our community, we, frankly, lose a part of our overall legitimacy. We must and we will. And that's why we're here today. "Do you Agree with the statement That ICANN will lose part of ITS Global legitimacy if it does not engage at every level With China of the community? 5.When ICANN Announced it was opening ITS Global first engagement office in Beijing, the China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC) Stated That it would "invest Necessary human and materials resources in the construction of the center and Actively carry out ITS functions Including the coordination, . communication, as well as operation in order to Provide effective, long-term and stable services for ICANN to serve China's Internet industry "Please provide yes-or-no answers to the following questions: to. Did CNNIC invest human and materials resources in the construction of ICANN's overall engagement office in Beijing? b. CNNIC Is Actively carrying out the functions, coordination, communication, or operation of ICANN's overall engagement office in Beijing? c. Do any CNNIC or Individuals Associated With the Chinese government formally or informally Have a role in ICANN's overall engagement office in Beijing? 6. ICANN Currently lists the address for each office and engagement hub office on ITS website except for the engagement office in Beijing. Please provide the address of ICANN's engagement office in Beijing. 7. When Lu Wei, Minister of the Cyberspace Administration of China and Incumbent Vice Minister of the Central Propaganda Department, Assumed the role of the Chairperson of CNNIC in December 2014, ICANN did take any action to Ensure That overall ITS office in Beijing engagement was not being used to carry out censorship for the Chinese government? 8. Do you Agree with the Business Constituency's concern That the term "Chinese registrant" in XYZ's RSEP is too broad and Could Be Interpreted to allow the extraterritorial application of Chinese censorship law to include residents of Hong Kong? 9. Do you agree That's approval of XYZ XYZ RSEP will place in a position of Having to Comply with government-sponsored censorship of domain names for political purposes, Which will undermine a stable Internet ecosystem? 10. A member of the Non-Connected Party House's (NCPH) Commercial Stakeholder Group recently Stated, "The ICANN board wants to engage more With China and India following the IANA transition, Which somewhat Explains the board's decision not to take action Against Chehade. " to.Please describe ICANN's plans for engagement With China following IANA potential transition. b. Did ICANN's IANA post transition plans play any role With China in the decision not to take Fadi Chehade Action Against? We appreciate your cooperation in esta Very Important matter and look forward to your response at the above stated date and time. Please contact Sean McLean (Senator Cruz), Sarah Seitz (Senator Lankford), and Christy Knese (Senator Lee) of our staffs haver any questions Regarding this Request. Sincerely, [Signed by Senators Cruz, Lee and Lankford] cc: Mr. Fadi Chehade, Chief Executive Officer Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers The Honorable Lawrence E. Strickling, Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information, US Department of Commerce " Rum [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/aef9e22e94.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] RES: Event Caribnog in Jamaica
by apisanty＠gmail.com March 3, 2016

March 3, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: RES: Event Caribnog in Jamaica from: apisanty(a)gmail.com Niran, I have Referred to the geography as "subregion" in an Attempt to keep the LAC region of ICANN in communication at the ground level of our Organizations and people; to Maintain the long-term, big-picture view. The Including policy of people from different subregions in CROPP activity was as long ago made a good-faith way to avoid the looming splintering Actively Among Organizations With claims for representation in the region. The unity of the region has-been recently Recognised by the "regions study" and there there is little wiggle room (all that is available must be used, of course.) Have I deliberately left out any of Individuals in order nominations to leave open the Possibility of volunteers Who Can Effectively bridge the many different conditions we all face. I am not a volunteer for esta activity. Other Participations In This discussion Have Given a different kind of signal. After months of silence and abstaining from an election we now Have a couple of messages, one line of Which is asking for travel support and the other stereotyping negatively to large part of our community. That, for me, is a conversation-stopper. I hope to travel to reliable Those Marrakech can meet in a constructive mood and Achieve face-to-face communication That the is hard to Achieve by email and has-been proven impossible just now. Yo soy out except for the need to reply to unmotivated, unfair attacks: such as Have Already Been read again today. It Seems That we are back into the Where an intervention terrain of third parties has-been called for and must That is wait till resolved. I am sad Potentially That your good-faith question to me has-been drowned out by others. We almost got something going constructive. Yours, Alejandro Pisanty On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Niran Beharry <nbeharrytt(a)gmail.com> wrote: > So Alejandro are you suggesting that someone outside the region mentor Derisma > Queslin along with all the unique economic, cultural and historical > challenges we experience in the Caribbean, and if so who do you suggest ? > Or are you just taking an ideological stance practical and realistic > benefits for that person and the overall goals and outcomes for CROPP be > damned ? > Niran Beharry > > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:18 PM, <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] >> >> Subject: Re: RES: Event Caribnog in Jamaica >> from: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com >> >> Really now! >> >> >> I have retreated From this list it depresses the spirit Because .... and >> take >> away from the quality of my life. >> >> >> May be the member from Ibero-America is in a time zone 12 hours That Is >> ahead of us. But the record will show this is yet another example of the >> LACRALO [former] leadership tendency to dictatorial Franco-style >> Behaviour. >> >> >> And Why They no longer enjoy my respect. Or acknowledgment. >> >> >> This well know. The rump That is LACRALO leadership will never be allowed >> to define the Caribbean's experience or ITS needs. PERIOD. >> >> >> I am Jamaican. I know what is happening in Jamaica and the Caribbean at >> large. Quite apart from the fact We were never Consulted, the proposal >> CROPP for Derisma under Queslin to Attend CaribNOG major shows >> deficiencies. And a woeful ignorance of our situation. >> >> >> Most CaribNOG are Inglés-speaking attendees.The senior leadership of >> CaribNOG are very much aware of the technical aspects of ICANN >> engagement; >> Bevil Wooding check out here: >> http://www.root-dnssec.org/tcr/selection-2010/ >> >> >> I do not know Derisma Queslin. But I can Assure You That Given the goals >> of >> CROPP, I am not aware That Derisma Queslin have the experience or >> previous >> Involvement in ICANN and ICANN At-Large to Effectively execute outreach >> to >> Inglés-speaking Caribbean mostly At-Large interests on the Behalf of >> ICANN >> At-Large. >> >> >> CROPP has a residual purpose of outreach and engagement. So We Could >> make a >> very weak case for Derisma Queslin to Attend With the goal of Having That >> Become more person engaged in ICANN At Large. But absent direct >> mentoring, >> That goal would not likely to be successfully Realized. >> >> >> The Proposal Submitted By Jacqueline Morris falls inline Directly With >> The >> Desired goals and outcomes for CROPP. My friend and colleague Bevil >> Wooding is the convenor and in chareg of the book at CaribNOG. Jacqueline >> Already have a speaking slot at assured CaribNOG 11 THUS raising the >> profile of ICANN At-Large at CaribNOG 11.Jacqueline Could Also mentor >> Derisma and make introductions to the attendees at CaribNOG. >> >> >> We Have Given CROPP available slots, the goals and outcomes of CROPP can >> be >> Realized by sending Both Proposals. The proposal for Desirma Queslin May >> be >> updated to focus on engagement and the proposal for Jacqueline Morris >> Continues to focus on outreach and she can mentor Also as described >> Derisma >> earlier. >> >> >> Samuels -Carlton >> The University of the West Indies >> >> >> >> >> ============================== >> Carlton A Samuels >> Mobile: 876-818-1799 >> * Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround * >> ============================= >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:07 AM Jacqueline Morris < >> jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com >> > wrote: >> > Hi everyone >> > The Outreach meeting information indicated that the deadline for >> > submitting a CROPP application was March 2nd, which is today. I've >> > submitted mine, but it seems from this thread that the decision has >> > already been made, albeit before the due date? I really hope that given >> > that my submission was done in advance of the date, my application is >> > considered for this outreach event. >> > Sincerely >> > Jacqueline Morris >> > >> > Jacqueline A. Morris >> > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and >> > Free. (after Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> ) >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:26 PM, <sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org> wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] >> >> >> >> Subject: RES: Event Caribnog in Jamaica >> >> from: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org >> >> >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ___________________________________________________ >> >> >> >> >> >> Sylvia Leite Herlein >> >> >> >> >> >> <mailto:sylvia@internautabrasil.org> sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org >> >> >> >> >> >> ALAC-LACRALO Delegate to NomComm 2014-2016 >> >> >> >> >> >> One World, One Internet >> >> >> >> >> >> cid: 26A2D0D9-E7A9-455D-BCDC-26757E8E3078 >> >> >> >> >> >> ex - LACRALO Secretary-ICANN / 2012-2014 - >> >> >> >> >> >> ex - ALAC Member 2009-2011 - <http://atlarge.icann.org/> >> >> http://atlarge.icann.org >> >> >> >> >> >> Skype: sylvia_leite >> >> >> >> >> >> Assinatura_Sylvia_Internautabrasil >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: >> >> lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome of Humberto >> >> Carrasco >> >> Posted in: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 21:16 >> >> To: Alejandro Pisanty >> >> Cc: LACRALO >> >> Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Event Caribnog in Jamaica >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Alexander, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> A very wise decision in my view. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The 01/03/2016, at 8:58 pm, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> He >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Alberto, all / as, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I applaud this decision by the procedure, criteria, organization and >> the >> >> person appointed. A good result of your action to diversify the >> presence of >> >> the neediest organizations in the Caribbean. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Alejandro Pisanty >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Alberto Soto < >> asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Dear all, Dev. >> >> Below the link with the application for the event in Montego Bay, >> >> Jamaica. >> >> Derisma concur Queslin, member of the Association des Haitienne >> >> Internautes Haiti. This will allow our ALS, which resides in a country >> >> with poor communications, make contact with the various sponsors and >> >> concurrent. It is requested that ALS had a technical profile for >> >> be commensurate to the level of the event. >> >> You get a specific view of the region, and may disseminate >> >> ALS develops its activities, LACRALO and ICANN. >> >> I'll send to the event venue, media materials and LACRALO >> >> I CAN. >> >> >> >> >> >> Best regards >> >> >> >> >> >> Alberto Soto >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://community.icann.org/display/croppfy16/LACRALO+Trip+Proposal+1+DRAFT >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original message----- >> >> From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> >> [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of >> >> Alberto >> >> copse >> >> Posted on: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 9:39 a.m. >> >> To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> >> CC: 'LACRALO discussion list' <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > >> >> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] The results of the LACRALO call O & >> E >> >> on Thursday 25 February 2016 >> >> >> >> >> >> Dear, we are working on the designation of who will attend this >> >> event. This form will be filed with the applicant designated in the >> >> today or tomorrow. >> >> >> >> >> >> Best regards >> >> >> >> >> >> Alberto Soto >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original message----- >> >> From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> >> [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of >> >> Posted >> >> on: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 9:01 a.m. >> >> To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> >> CC: LACRALO discussion list <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >> >> Subject: Re: Results of the LACRALO call O & E on Thursday 25 >> >> February 2016 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [[Translated text (in -> en) -]] >> >> >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Results of the LACRALO call O & E on Thursday 25 >> >> February 2016 >> >> From: devtee(a)gmail.com >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks Jacqueline, here is how LACRALO CROPP to be filled >> >> >> >> >> https://community.icann.org/display/croppfy16/LACRALO+Trip+Proposal+1+DRAFT >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The materials can be sent to headquarters by the ICANN staff, >> >> provided advance notice. Outreach and Participation SC >> >> wiki has a page to keep track of such materials >> >> broadcasting applications. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> dev Anand >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The Sun February 27, 2016 at 18:01, Jacqueline Morris < >> >> jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com> >> >> He wrote: >> >> > Hi everyone >> >> > I can be available for the CaribNog meeting. It luckily falls exactly >> >> > in >> >> > days between the UTT and UWI exam periods. Can materials etc be >> >> > shipped directly to the venue? The overlap on April 20th between ARIN >> >> > and CaribNog seems serendipitous as well. Sounds like a great >> >> opportunity >> >> > Jacqueline >> >> > >> >> > Jacqueline A. Morris >> >> > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible >> and >> >> > (after Chris Lehmann ) >> >> > >> >> > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Dear All, >> >> >> >> >> >> The LACRALO members of the Outreach and Engagement SC (LAC O&E) had >> a >> >> >> on >> >> >> Thursday 25 February 2016 ( https://community.icann.org/x/UxmAAw) >> >> >> Together with the LACRALO chair and secretariat reviewed the LAC >> >> >> Outreach events calendar maintained by the LAC O & E >> >> >> (Http://bitly.com/LAC-Outreach-Calendar-List) for possible >> outreach >> >> >> Events That Could be used for CROPP Proposals. >> >> >> >> >> >> Three Proposals Were Identified as suitable candidates for using >> >> CROPP: >> >> >> >> >> >> CaribNOG (Jamaica) - April 20 to April 22 LACNIC 26 (Cuba) - May 2 >> >> >> To May 6 First Latin American and Caribbean Forum (Colombia) - May >> 17 >> >> >> To May 18 >> >> >> >> >> >> For the CaribNOG event, no traveler was on the call Suggested. >> >> >> Suggestions? >> >> >> A request for CaribNOG CROPP needs to be filed around March 2, >> 2016. >> >> >> >> >> >> For the LACNIC 26, Cuba, Harold Suggested Arcos was. >> >> >> A request for LACNIC needs CROPP filed by March to July 2016. >> >> >> >> >> >> For the Latin American and Caribbean Forum in Colombia, it was >> >> >> Suggested That a speaker, Shiva Bissessar Could speak on >> >> >> Cybersecurity At this event using a CROPP proposal. A request CROPP >> >> >> For This proposal needs to be filed by March 29 2016. >> >> >> >> >> >> It was NOTED That Bartlett Morgan HAD Obtained a fellowship to SSGI >> >> >> 2016 from March 29 to April 2016 January 2016 so I would need some >> >> >> Outreach materials before then. >> >> >> >> >> Dev Anand >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> Lac-discuss-in mailing list >> >> >> lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> >> >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/dcf0414a12.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] RES: Event Caribnog in Jamaica
by carlton.samuels＠gmail.com March 3, 2016

March 3, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: RES: Event Caribnog in Jamaica from: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com Really now! I have retreated From this list it depresses the spirit Because .... and take away from the quality of my life. May be the member from Ibero-America is in a time zone 12 hours That Is ahead of us. But the record will show this is yet another example of the LACRALO [former] leadership tendency to dictatorial Franco-style Behaviour. And Why They no longer enjoy my respect. Or acknowledgment. This well know. The rump That is LACRALO leadership will never be allowed to define the Caribbean's experience or ITS needs. PERIOD. I am Jamaican. I know what is happening in Jamaica and the Caribbean at large. Quite apart from the fact We were never Consulted, the proposal CROPP for Derisma under Queslin to Attend CaribNOG major shows deficiencies. And a woeful ignorance of our situation. Most CaribNOG are Inglés-speaking attendees.The senior leadership of CaribNOG are very much aware of the technical aspects of ICANN engagement; Bevil Wooding check out here: http://www.root-dnssec.org/tcr/selection-2010/ I do not know Derisma Queslin. But I can Assure You That Given the goals of CROPP, I am not aware That Derisma Queslin have the experience or previous Involvement in ICANN and ICANN At-Large to Effectively execute outreach to Inglés-speaking Caribbean mostly At-Large interests on the Behalf of ICANN At-Large. CROPP has a residual purpose of outreach and engagement. So We Could make a very weak case for Derisma Queslin to Attend With the goal of Having That Become more person engaged in ICANN At Large. But absent direct mentoring, That goal would not likely to be successfully Realized. The Proposal Submitted By Jacqueline Morris falls inline Directly With The Desired goals and outcomes for CROPP. My friend and colleague Bevil Wooding is the convenor and in chareg of the book at CaribNOG. Jacqueline Already have a speaking slot at assured CaribNOG 11 THUS raising the profile of ICANN At-Large at CaribNOG 11.Jacqueline Could Also mentor Derisma and make introductions to the attendees at CaribNOG. We Have Given CROPP available slots, the goals and outcomes of CROPP can be Realized by sending Both Proposals. The proposal for Desirma Queslin May be updated to focus on engagement and the proposal for Jacqueline Morris Continues to focus on outreach and she can mentor Also as described Derisma earlier. Samuels -Carlton The University of the West Indies ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 * Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround * ============================= On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:07 AM Jacqueline Morris <jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com > wrote: > Hi everyone > The Outreach meeting information indicated that the deadline for > submitting a CROPP application was March 2nd, which is today. I've > submitted mine, but it seems from this thread that the decision has > already been made, albeit before the due date? I really hope that given > that my submission was done in advance of the date, my application is > considered for this outreach event. > Sincerely > Jacqueline Morris > > Jacqueline A. Morris > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and > Free. (after Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> ) > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:26 PM, <sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org> wrote: > >> >> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] >> >> Subject: RES: Event Caribnog in Jamaica >> from: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org >> >> +1 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ___________________________________________________ >> >> >> Sylvia Leite Herlein >> >> >> <mailto:sylvia@internautabrasil.org> sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org >> >> >> ALAC-LACRALO Delegate to NomComm 2014-2016 >> >> >> One World, One Internet >> >> >> cid: 26A2D0D9-E7A9-455D-BCDC-26757E8E3078 >> >> >> ex - LACRALO Secretary-ICANN / 2012-2014 - >> >> >> ex - ALAC Member 2009-2011 - <http://atlarge.icann.org/> >> http://atlarge.icann.org >> >> >> Skype: sylvia_leite >> >> >> Assinatura_Sylvia_Internautabrasil >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: >> lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome of Humberto >> Carrasco >> Posted in: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 21:16 >> To: Alejandro Pisanty >> Cc: LACRALO >> Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Event Caribnog in Jamaica >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Alexander, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> A very wise decision in my view. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> >> >> >> The 01/03/2016, at 8:58 pm, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> He >> wrote: >> >> >> Alberto, all / as, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I applaud this decision by the procedure, criteria, organization and the >> person appointed. A good result of your action to diversify the presence of >> the neediest organizations in the Caribbean. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Alejandro Pisanty >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> >> wrote: >> >> >> Dear all, Dev. >> Below the link with the application for the event in Montego Bay, >> Jamaica. >> Derisma concur Queslin, member of the Association des Haitienne >> Internautes Haiti. This will allow our ALS, which resides in a country >> with poor communications, make contact with the various sponsors and >> concurrent. It is requested that ALS had a technical profile for >> be commensurate to the level of the event. >> You get a specific view of the region, and may disseminate >> ALS develops its activities, LACRALO and ICANN. >> I'll send to the event venue, media materials and LACRALO >> I CAN. >> >> >> Best regards >> >> >> Alberto Soto >> >> >> >> >> >> https://community.icann.org/display/croppfy16/LACRALO+Trip+Proposal+1+DRAFT >> >> >> >> >> -----Original message----- >> From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of >> Alberto >> copse >> Posted on: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 9:39 a.m. >> To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> CC: 'LACRALO discussion list' <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] The results of the LACRALO call O & E >> on Thursday 25 February 2016 >> >> >> Dear, we are working on the designation of who will attend this >> event. This form will be filed with the applicant designated in the >> today or tomorrow. >> >> >> Best regards >> >> >> Alberto Soto >> >> >> -----Original message----- >> From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of >> Posted >> on: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 9:01 a.m. >> To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> CC: LACRALO discussion list <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >> Subject: Re: Results of the LACRALO call O & E on Thursday 25 >> February 2016 >> >> >> >> >> [[Translated text (in -> en) -]] >> >> >> Subject: Re: Results of the LACRALO call O & E on Thursday 25 >> February 2016 >> From: devtee(a)gmail.com >> >> >> Thanks Jacqueline, here is how LACRALO CROPP to be filled >> >> https://community.icann.org/display/croppfy16/LACRALO+Trip+Proposal+1+DRAFT >> >> >> >> >> The materials can be sent to headquarters by the ICANN staff, >> provided advance notice. Outreach and Participation SC >> wiki has a page to keep track of such materials >> broadcasting applications. >> >> >> >> >> dev Anand >> >> >> >> >> The Sun February 27, 2016 at 18:01, Jacqueline Morris < >> jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com> >> He wrote: >> > Hi everyone >> > I can be available for the CaribNog meeting. It luckily falls exactly >> > in >> > days between the UTT and UWI exam periods. Can materials etc be >> > shipped directly to the venue? The overlap on April 20th between ARIN >> > and CaribNog seems serendipitous as well. Sounds like a great >> opportunity >> > Jacqueline >> > >> > Jacqueline A. Morris >> > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and >> > (after Chris Lehmann ) >> > >> > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Dear All, >> >> >> >> The LACRALO members of the Outreach and Engagement SC (LAC O&E) had a >> >> on >> >> Thursday 25 February 2016 ( https://community.icann.org/x/UxmAAw) >> >> Together with the LACRALO chair and secretariat reviewed the LAC >> >> Outreach events calendar maintained by the LAC O & E >> >> (Http://bitly.com/LAC-Outreach-Calendar-List) for possible outreach >> >> Events That Could be used for CROPP Proposals. >> >> >> >> Three Proposals Were Identified as suitable candidates for using >> CROPP: >> >> >> >> CaribNOG (Jamaica) - April 20 to April 22 LACNIC 26 (Cuba) - May 2 >> >> To May 6 First Latin American and Caribbean Forum (Colombia) - May 17 >> >> To May 18 >> >> >> >> For the CaribNOG event, no traveler was on the call Suggested. >> >> Suggestions? >> >> A request for CaribNOG CROPP needs to be filed around March 2, 2016. >> >> >> >> For the LACNIC 26, Cuba, Harold Suggested Arcos was. >> >> A request for LACNIC needs CROPP filed by March to July 2016. >> >> >> >> For the Latin American and Caribbean Forum in Colombia, it was >> >> Suggested That a speaker, Shiva Bissessar Could speak on >> >> Cybersecurity At this event using a CROPP proposal. A request CROPP >> >> For This proposal needs to be filed by March 29 2016. >> >> >> >> It was NOTED That Bartlett Morgan HAD Obtained a fellowship to SSGI >> >> 2016 from March 29 to April 2016 January 2016 so I would need some >> >> Outreach materials before then. >> >> >> Dev Anand >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Lac-discuss-in mailing list >> >> lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9f707ef7c2.html --]]

3 2

Re: [lac-discuss-en] RES: Event Caribnog in Jamaica
by nbeharrytt＠gmail.com March 3, 2016

March 3, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: RES: Event Caribnog in Jamaica from: nbeharrytt(a)gmail.com So are you suggesting Alejandro That someone outside the region mentor Derisma Queslin Along With all the unique economic, cultural and historical challenges we experience in the Caribbean, and if so who do you Suggest? Or are you just taking an ideological stance practical and realistic That person and benefits for the overall goals and outcomes for CROPP be damned? Niran Beharry On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:18 PM, <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Re: RES: Event Caribnog in Jamaica > from: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com > > Really now! > > > I have retreated From this list it depresses the spirit Because .... and > take > away from the quality of my life. > > > May be the member from Ibero-America is in a time zone 12 hours That Is > ahead of us. But the record will show this is yet another example of the > LACRALO [former] leadership tendency to dictatorial Franco-style > Behaviour. > > > And Why They no longer enjoy my respect. Or acknowledgment. > > > This well know. The rump That is LACRALO leadership will never be allowed > to define the Caribbean's experience or ITS needs. PERIOD. > > > I am Jamaican. I know what is happening in Jamaica and the Caribbean at > large. Quite apart from the fact We were never Consulted, the proposal > CROPP for Derisma under Queslin to Attend CaribNOG major shows > deficiencies. And a woeful ignorance of our situation. > > > Most CaribNOG are Inglés-speaking attendees.The senior leadership of > CaribNOG are very much aware of the technical aspects of ICANN engagement; > Bevil Wooding check out here: > http://www.root-dnssec.org/tcr/selection-2010/ > > > I do not know Derisma Queslin. But I can Assure You That Given the goals > of > CROPP, I am not aware That Derisma Queslin have the experience or previous > Involvement in ICANN and ICANN At-Large to Effectively execute outreach to > Inglés-speaking Caribbean mostly At-Large interests on the Behalf of ICANN > At-Large. > > > CROPP has a residual purpose of outreach and engagement. So We Could make > a > very weak case for Derisma Queslin to Attend With the goal of Having That > Become more person engaged in ICANN At Large. But absent direct mentoring, > That goal would not likely to be successfully Realized. > > > The Proposal Submitted By Jacqueline Morris falls inline Directly With The > Desired goals and outcomes for CROPP. My friend and colleague Bevil > Wooding is the convenor and in chareg of the book at CaribNOG. Jacqueline > Already have a speaking slot at assured CaribNOG 11 THUS raising the > profile of ICANN At-Large at CaribNOG 11.Jacqueline Could Also mentor > Derisma and make introductions to the attendees at CaribNOG. > > > We Have Given CROPP available slots, the goals and outcomes of CROPP can > be > Realized by sending Both Proposals. The proposal for Desirma Queslin May > be > updated to focus on engagement and the proposal for Jacqueline Morris > Continues to focus on outreach and she can mentor Also as described > Derisma > earlier. > > > Samuels -Carlton > The University of the West Indies > > > > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > * Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround * > ============================= > > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:07 AM Jacqueline Morris < > jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com > > wrote: > > Hi everyone > > The Outreach meeting information indicated that the deadline for > > submitting a CROPP application was March 2nd, which is today. I've > > submitted mine, but it seems from this thread that the decision has > > already been made, albeit before the due date? I really hope that given > > that my submission was done in advance of the date, my application is > > considered for this outreach event. > > Sincerely > > Jacqueline Morris > > > > Jacqueline A. Morris > > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and > > Free. (after Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> ) > > > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:26 PM, <sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > >> > >> Subject: RES: Event Caribnog in Jamaica > >> from: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ___________________________________________________ > >> > >> > >> Sylvia Leite Herlein > >> > >> > >> <mailto:sylvia@internautabrasil.org> sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org > >> > >> > >> ALAC-LACRALO Delegate to NomComm 2014-2016 > >> > >> > >> One World, One Internet > >> > >> > >> cid: 26A2D0D9-E7A9-455D-BCDC-26757E8E3078 > >> > >> > >> ex - LACRALO Secretary-ICANN / 2012-2014 - > >> > >> > >> ex - ALAC Member 2009-2011 - <http://atlarge.icann.org/> > >> http://atlarge.icann.org > >> > >> > >> Skype: sylvia_leite > >> > >> > >> Assinatura_Sylvia_Internautabrasil > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: > >> lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome of Humberto > >> Carrasco > >> Posted in: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 21:16 > >> To: Alejandro Pisanty > >> Cc: LACRALO > >> Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Event Caribnog in Jamaica > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Alexander, > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> A very wise decision in my view. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Cheers > >> > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> The 01/03/2016, at 8:58 pm, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> He > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Alberto, all / as, > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> I applaud this decision by the procedure, criteria, organization and > the > >> person appointed. A good result of your action to diversify the > presence of > >> the neediest organizations in the Caribbean. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Alejandro Pisanty > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Alberto Soto < > asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Dear all, Dev. > >> Below the link with the application for the event in Montego Bay, > >> Jamaica. > >> Derisma concur Queslin, member of the Association des Haitienne > >> Internautes Haiti. This will allow our ALS, which resides in a country > >> with poor communications, make contact with the various sponsors and > >> concurrent. It is requested that ALS had a technical profile for > >> be commensurate to the level of the event. > >> You get a specific view of the region, and may disseminate > >> ALS develops its activities, LACRALO and ICANN. > >> I'll send to the event venue, media materials and LACRALO > >> I CAN. > >> > >> > >> Best regards > >> > >> > >> Alberto Soto > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > https://community.icann.org/display/croppfy16/LACRALO+Trip+Proposal+1+DRAFT > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original message----- > >> From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of > >> Alberto > >> copse > >> Posted on: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 9:39 a.m. > >> To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> CC: 'LACRALO discussion list' <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > >> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] The results of the LACRALO call O & E > >> on Thursday 25 February 2016 > >> > >> > >> Dear, we are working on the designation of who will attend this > >> event. This form will be filed with the applicant designated in the > >> today or tomorrow. > >> > >> > >> Best regards > >> > >> > >> Alberto Soto > >> > >> > >> -----Original message----- > >> From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of > >> Posted > >> on: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 9:01 a.m. > >> To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> CC: LACRALO discussion list <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > >> Subject: Re: Results of the LACRALO call O & E on Thursday 25 > >> February 2016 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> [[Translated text (in -> en) -]] > >> > >> > >> Subject: Re: Results of the LACRALO call O & E on Thursday 25 > >> February 2016 > >> From: devtee(a)gmail.com > >> > >> > >> Thanks Jacqueline, here is how LACRALO CROPP to be filled > >> > >> > https://community.icann.org/display/croppfy16/LACRALO+Trip+Proposal+1+DRAFT > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> The materials can be sent to headquarters by the ICANN staff, > >> provided advance notice. Outreach and Participation SC > >> wiki has a page to keep track of such materials > >> broadcasting applications. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> dev Anand > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> The Sun February 27, 2016 at 18:01, Jacqueline Morris < > >> jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com> > >> He wrote: > >> > Hi everyone > >> > I can be available for the CaribNog meeting. It luckily falls exactly > >> > in > >> > days between the UTT and UWI exam periods. Can materials etc be > >> > shipped directly to the venue? The overlap on April 20th between ARIN > >> > and CaribNog seems serendipitous as well. Sounds like a great > >> opportunity > >> > Jacqueline > >> > > >> > Jacqueline A. Morris > >> > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and > >> > (after Chris Lehmann ) > >> > > >> > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Dear All, > >> >> > >> >> The LACRALO members of the Outreach and Engagement SC (LAC O&E) had a > >> >> on > >> >> Thursday 25 February 2016 ( https://community.icann.org/x/UxmAAw) > >> >> Together with the LACRALO chair and secretariat reviewed the LAC > >> >> Outreach events calendar maintained by the LAC O & E > >> >> (Http://bitly.com/LAC-Outreach-Calendar-List) for possible outreach > >> >> Events That Could be used for CROPP Proposals. > >> >> > >> >> Three Proposals Were Identified as suitable candidates for using > >> CROPP: > >> >> > >> >> CaribNOG (Jamaica) - April 20 to April 22 LACNIC 26 (Cuba) - May 2 > >> >> To May 6 First Latin American and Caribbean Forum (Colombia) - May > 17 > >> >> To May 18 > >> >> > >> >> For the CaribNOG event, no traveler was on the call Suggested. > >> >> Suggestions? > >> >> A request for CaribNOG CROPP needs to be filed around March 2, 2016. > >> >> > >> >> For the LACNIC 26, Cuba, Harold Suggested Arcos was. > >> >> A request for LACNIC needs CROPP filed by March to July 2016. > >> >> > >> >> For the Latin American and Caribbean Forum in Colombia, it was > >> >> Suggested That a speaker, Shiva Bissessar Could speak on > >> >> Cybersecurity At this event using a CROPP proposal. A request CROPP > >> >> For This proposal needs to be filed by March 29 2016. > >> >> > >> >> It was NOTED That Bartlett Morgan HAD Obtained a fellowship to SSGI > >> >> 2016 from March 29 to April 2016 January 2016 so I would need some > >> >> Outreach materials before then. > >> >> > >> Dev Anand >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> Lac-discuss-in mailing list > >> >> lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c0f1568c31.html --]]

1 0

RES: Event Caribnog in Jamaica
by sylvia＠internautabrasil.org March 3, 2016

March 3, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: RES: Event Caribnog in Jamaica from: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org +1 ___________________________________________________ Sylvia Leite Herlein <mailto:sylvia@internautabrasil.org> sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org ALAC-LACRALO Delegate to NomComm 2014-2016 One World, One Internet cid: 26A2D0D9-E7A9-455D-BCDC-26757E8E3078 ex - LACRALO Secretary-ICANN / 2012-2014 - ex - ALAC Member 2009-2011 - <http://atlarge.icann.org/> http://atlarge.icann.org Skype: sylvia_leite Assinatura_Sylvia_Internautabrasil From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome of Humberto Carrasco Posted in: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 21:16 To: Alejandro Pisanty Cc: LACRALO Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Event Caribnog in Jamaica Alexander, A very wise decision in my view. Cheers Sent from my iPhone The 01/03/2016, at 8:58 pm, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> He wrote: Alberto, all / as, I applaud this decision by the procedure, criteria, organization and the person appointed. A good result of your action to diversify the presence of the neediest organizations in the Caribbean. Alejandro Pisanty On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> wrote: Dear all, Dev. Below the link with the application for the event in Montego Bay, Jamaica. Derisma concur Queslin, member of the Association des Haitienne Internautes Haiti. This will allow our ALS, which resides in a country with poor communications, make contact with the various sponsors and concurrent. It is requested that ALS had a technical profile for be commensurate to the level of the event. You get a specific view of the region, and may disseminate ALS develops its activities, LACRALO and ICANN. I'll send to the event venue, media materials and LACRALO I CAN. Best regards Alberto Soto https://community.icann.org/display/croppfy16/LACRALO+Trip+Proposal+1+DRAFT -----Original message----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Alberto copse Posted on: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 9:39 a.m. To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: 'LACRALO discussion list' <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] The results of the LACRALO call O & E on Thursday 25 February 2016 Dear, we are working on the designation of who will attend this event. This form will be filed with the applicant designated in the today or tomorrow. Best regards Alberto Soto -----Original message----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Posted on: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 9:01 a.m. To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: LACRALO discussion list <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: Results of the LACRALO call O & E on Thursday 25 February 2016 [[Translated text (in -> en) -]] Subject: Re: Results of the LACRALO call O & E on Thursday 25 February 2016 From: devtee(a)gmail.com Thanks Jacqueline, here is how LACRALO CROPP to be filled https://community.icann.org/display/croppfy16/LACRALO+Trip+Proposal+1+DRAFT The materials can be sent to headquarters by the ICANN staff, provided advance notice. Outreach and Participation SC wiki has a page to keep track of such materials broadcasting applications. dev Anand The Sun February 27, 2016 at 18:01, Jacqueline Morris <jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com> He wrote: > Hi everyone > I can be available for the CaribNog meeting. It luckily falls exactly > in > days between the UTT and UWI exam periods. Can materials etc be > shipped directly to the venue? The overlap on April 20th between ARIN > and CaribNog seems serendipitous as well. Sounds like a great opportunity > Jacqueline > > Jacqueline A. Morris > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and > (after Chris Lehmann ) > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh > wrote: >> >> Dear All, >> >> The LACRALO members of the Outreach and Engagement SC (LAC O&E) had a >> on >> Thursday 25 February 2016 ( https://community.icann.org/x/UxmAAw) >> Together with the LACRALO chair and secretariat reviewed the LAC >> Outreach events calendar maintained by the LAC O & E >> (Http://bitly.com/LAC-Outreach-Calendar-List) for possible outreach >> Events That Could be used for CROPP Proposals. >> >> Three Proposals Were Identified as suitable candidates for using CROPP: >> >> CaribNOG (Jamaica) - April 20 to April 22 LACNIC 26 (Cuba) - May 2 >> To May 6 First Latin American and Caribbean Forum (Colombia) - May 17 >> To May 18 >> >> For the CaribNOG event, no traveler was on the call Suggested. >> Suggestions? >> A request for CaribNOG CROPP needs to be filed around March 2, 2016. >> >> For the LACNIC 26, Cuba, Harold Suggested Arcos was. >> A request for LACNIC needs CROPP filed by March to July 2016. >> >> For the Latin American and Caribbean Forum in Colombia, it was >> Suggested That a speaker, Shiva Bissessar Could speak on >> Cybersecurity At this event using a CROPP proposal. A request CROPP >> For This proposal needs to be filed by March 29 2016. >> >> It was NOTED That Bartlett Morgan HAD Obtained a fellowship to SSGI >> 2016 from March 29 to April 2016 January 2016 so I would need some >> Outreach materials before then. >> Dev Anand >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lac-discuss-in mailing list >> lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0f0b6cafcc.html --]]

3 2

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Outcomes from the LACRALO O&E call on Thursday 25 February 2016
by Renata Aquino Ribeiro March 2, 2016

March 2, 2016

Dear all I'd like to point out that I will be in SSIG 2016 as well and I'm an administrator of a Whatsapp group for the meeting. Future alumni please email to join. Also as a member of CSISAC OECD I'd like to put in CROPP radar the meeting in Cancun in June. Is it possible? Thanks Renata Em 28/02/2016 1:00 PM, <lac-discuss-en-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> escreveu: > Send lac-discuss-en mailing list submissions to > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > lac-discuss-en-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > lac-discuss-en-owner(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of lac-discuss-en digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Outcomes from the LACRALO O&E call on Thursday 25 February > 2016 (Dev Anand Teelucksingh) > 2. Re: Outcomes from the LACRALO O&E call on Thursday 25 > February 2016 (Jacqueline Morris) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee(a)gmail.com> > To: LACRALO discussion list <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Cc: > Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:27:26 -0400 > Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Outcomes from the LACRALO O&E call on Thursday > 25 February 2016 > Dear All, > > The LACRALO members of the Outreach and Engagement SC (LAC O&E) had a call > on > Thursday 25 February 2016 (https://community.icann.org/x/UxmAAw) and > together with the LACRALO chair and secretariat reviewed the LAC > outreach events calendar maintained by the LAC O&E > (http://bitly.com/LAC-Outreach-Calendar-List) for possible outreach > events that could be used for CROPP proposals. > > Three proposals were identified as suitable candidates for using CROPP: > > CaribNOG (Jamaica) - April 20 to April 22 > LACNIC 26, (Cuba) - May 2 to May 6 > First Latin American and Caribbean Forum (Colombia) - May 17 to May 18 > > For the CaribNOG event, no traveller was suggested on the call. > Suggestions? > A CROPP request for CaribNOG needs to be filed around March 2 2016. > > For the LACNIC 26, Cuba, Harold Arcos was suggested. > A CROPP request for LACNIC needs to filed by March 7 2016. > > For the Latin American and Caribbean Forum in Colombia, it was > suggested that a speaker, Shiva Bissessar could speak on cybersecurity > at this event using a CROPP proposal. A CROPP request for this > proposal needs to be filed by March 29 2016. > > It was noted that Bartlett Morgan had obtained a fellowship to SSIG 2016 > from > March 29 2016 to April 1 2016 so he would need some outreach materials > before then. > > Dev Anand > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Jacqueline Morris <jam(a)jacquelinemorris.com> > To: Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee(a)gmail.com> > Cc: LACRALO discussion list <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:01:41 -0400 > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Outcomes from the LACRALO O&E call on > Thursday 25 February 2016 > Hi everyone > I can be available for the CaribNog meeting. It luckily falls exactly in > the days between the UTT and UWI exam periods. Can materials etc be shipped > directly to the venue? The overlap on April 20th between ARIN and CaribNog > seems serendipitous as well. Sounds like a great opportunity for outreach. > Jacqueline > > Jacqueline A. Morris > Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and > Free. (after Chris Lehmann <http://twitter.com/chrislehmann> ) > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee(a)gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Dear All, >> >> The LACRALO members of the Outreach and Engagement SC (LAC O&E) had a >> call on >> Thursday 25 February 2016 (https://community.icann.org/x/UxmAAw) and >> together with the LACRALO chair and secretariat reviewed the LAC >> outreach events calendar maintained by the LAC O&E >> (http://bitly.com/LAC-Outreach-Calendar-List) for possible outreach >> events that could be used for CROPP proposals. >> >> Three proposals were identified as suitable candidates for using CROPP: >> >> CaribNOG (Jamaica) - April 20 to April 22 >> LACNIC 26, (Cuba) - May 2 to May 6 >> First Latin American and Caribbean Forum (Colombia) - May 17 to May 18 >> >> For the CaribNOG event, no traveller was suggested on the call. >> Suggestions? >> A CROPP request for CaribNOG needs to be filed around March 2 2016. >> >> For the LACNIC 26, Cuba, Harold Arcos was suggested. >> A CROPP request for LACNIC needs to filed by March 7 2016. >> >> For the Latin American and Caribbean Forum in Colombia, it was >> suggested that a speaker, Shiva Bissessar could speak on cybersecurity >> at this event using a CROPP proposal. A CROPP request for this >> proposal needs to be filed by March 29 2016. >> >> It was noted that Bartlett Morgan had obtained a fellowship to SSIG 2016 >> from >> March 29 2016 to April 1 2016 so he would need some outreach materials >> before then. >> >> Dev Anand >> _______________________________________________ >> lac-discuss-en mailing list >> lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en >> > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > >

3 2