May 2017 - lac-discuss-en - lists.icann.org

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Utf-8? Q? About_the_system_of_voice = C3 = B3n? =
by hcarrascob＠gmail.com May 27, 2017

May 27, 2017

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =? Utf-8? Q? About_the_system_of_voice = C3 = B3n? = Desde: hcarrascob(a)gmail.com Alexander, I'm copying Sergio Salinas and the staff to make it an issue to be addressed in this WG. regards Sent from my iPhone > El 27-05-2017, a las 15:39, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> escribió: > > Humberto, > > muchas gracias por tu mensaje. Para convertirlo en una acción con posibilidades de acción concreta y susceptible de rendición de cuentas, te solicito atentamente transmitir el mensaje al grupo de trabajo de gobernanza interna de LACRALO con la: propuesta: siguiente: > > 1. en todo proceso de votación se establecerán los procedimientos necesarios para que los votantes puedan registrar la abstención respecto a las opciones presentadas. > > Atentamente, > > Alejandro Pisanty > > > 2017-05-27 7:50 GMT-05:00 Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com>: >> Estimado Alejandro, >> >> Muchas gracias por tus comentarios. Se tendrán en cuenta para el futuro. No hay que olvidar que es primera vez que se votan a todos los candidatos en un mismo período, donde además no habían contendores. >> >> >> >> Saludos >> >> >> >> 2017-05-26 23:49 GMT-04:00 Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com>: >>> Acerca del sistema utilizado en las votaciones abiertas >>> >>> >>> >>> Estimadas/os colegas, >>> >>> >>> >>> En relación a las votaciones abiertas para cubrir las posiciones de Chair (Presidente), Secretariat (Secretaría), representante de LACRALO ante ALAC y representante de LACRALO ante el NomCom, desde ISOC México queremos expresar nuestra inconformidad con el sistema de BigPulse utilizado para recoger los votos de los representantes de las ALS de LACRALO: >>> >>> >>> >>> 1. En primer lugar, la pregunta que se realiza es “Usted ratifica a los siguientes candidatos para sus posiciones respectivas las cuales empezaran al final de ICANN60 en Noviembre 2017? (sic). >>> >>> Técnicamente esta pregunta es incorrecta. LACRALO no se debe pronunciar por la “ratificación” de candidatos porque no todos se encuentran actualmente desempeñando el rol en el cual se están postulando como candidatos. >>> >>> La pregunta correcta, y como ya hemos discutido en varias oportunidades en LACRALO, es “si seleccionamos” a los candidatos postulados para las respectivas posiciones. >>> >>> >>> >>> 2. En segundo lugar, se utiliza una sola boleta para todas las posiciones abiertas, en lugar de disponer una individual para cada posición en la que se deba emitir el voto. Lo cual es incorrecto ya que se obliga a que se vote en conjunto por todas las posiciones respecto de las cuales se está solicitando el voto. Un representante no puede elegir votar en algunas posiciones y no en otras porque el sistema no se lo permite. >>> >>> >>> >>> 3. Adicionalmente, las opciones que se encuentran habilitadas para cada posición son únicamente “sí” y “no”. No se encuentra habilitada la opción “Abstención”. >>> >>> Esto atenta de manera directa contra la posibilidad de expresar, para alguna posición determinada, que no se está a favor de un candidato, aunque tampoco se quiere votar por el no, afectando las facultades de decidir de manera libre, emitiendo la opinión/posición que los representantes de las ALS consideren más beneficiosos para LACRALO. >>> >>> >>> >>> 4. En conclusión, el sistema utilizado –desconocemos si intencionalmente o por error- ocasiona que los votos que se emitan, sean votos dirigidos, afectando la libertad de elección que deberían tener todos los representantes de las ALS. >>> >>> >>> >>> En base a todo lo anterior, queremos dejar registrado de manera formal, la solicitud para que en futuras votaciones de LACRALO, sea modificado el sistema de votación utilizado para un correcto y legítimo ejercicio del derecho a voto que como representantes de las ALS tenemos. >>> >>> >>> >>> Se copia debajo una captura de pantalla del mencionado sistema de BigPulse y las opciones de voto habilitadas, y se adjunta al presente como documento en formato .pdf. >>> >>> >>> >>> Alejandro Pisanty >>> >>> Fátima Cambronero >>> >>> >>> -- >>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >>> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty >>> Facultad de Química UNAM >>> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico >>> +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD >>> +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 >>> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com >>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty >>> Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 >>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty >>> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org >>> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> lac-discuss-es mailing list >>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >>> >>> http://www.lacralo.org >> > > > > -- > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > Facultad de Química UNAM > Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD > +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/6afcfabbba.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Utf-8? Q? About_the_system_of_voice = C3 = B3n? =
by apisanty＠gmail.com May 27, 2017

May 27, 2017

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =? Utf-8? Q? About_the_system_of_voice = C3 = B3n? = Desde: apisanty(a)gmail.com Humberto, Thank you very much for your message. To make it an action with Possibilities for concrete and accountable action, I sincerely invite you to convey the message to the Internal governance of LACRALO with the following proposal: 1. In any voting process procedures shall be established Necessary for voters to register abstention The options presented. Sincerely, Alejandro Pisanty 2017-05-27 7:50 GMT-05: 00 Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> : > Estimado Alejandro, > > Muchas gracias por tus comentarios. Se tendrán en cuenta para el futuro. > No hay que olvidar que es primera vez que se votan a todos los candidatos > en un mismo período, donde además no habían contendores. > > > > Saludos > > > > 2017-05-26 23:49 GMT-04:00 Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com>: > >> Acerca del sistema utilizado en las votaciones abiertas >> >> >> >> Estimadas/os colegas, >> >> >> >> En relación a las votaciones abiertas para cubrir las posiciones de Chair >> (Presidente), Secretariat (Secretaría), representante de LACRALO ante ALAC >> y representante de LACRALO ante el NomCom, desde ISOC México queremos >> expresar nuestra inconformidad con el sistema de BigPulse utilizado para >> recoger los votos de los representantes de las ALS de LACRALO: >> >> >> >> 1. En primer lugar, la pregunta que se realiza es “Usted ratifica a los >> siguientes candidatos para sus posiciones respectivas las cuales empezaran >> al final de ICANN60 en Noviembre 2017? (*sic*). >> >> Técnicamente esta pregunta es incorrecta. LACRALO no se debe pronunciar >> por la “ratificación” de candidatos porque no todos se encuentran >> actualmente desempeñando el rol en el cual se están postulando como >> candidatos. >> >> La pregunta correcta, y como ya hemos discutido en varias oportunidades >> en LACRALO, es “si seleccionamos” a los candidatos postulados para las >> respectivas posiciones. >> >> >> >> 2. En segundo lugar, se utiliza una sola boleta para todas las posiciones >> abiertas, en lugar de disponer una individual para cada posición en la que >> se deba emitir el voto. Lo cual es incorrecto ya que se obliga a que se >> vote en conjunto por todas las posiciones respecto de las cuales se está >> solicitando el voto. Un representante no puede elegir votar en algunas >> posiciones y no en otras porque el sistema no se lo permite. >> >> >> >> 3. Adicionalmente, las opciones que se encuentran habilitadas para cada >> posición son únicamente “sí” y “no”. No se encuentra habilitada la opción >> “Abstención”. >> >> Esto atenta de manera directa contra la posibilidad de expresar, para >> alguna posición determinada, que no se está a favor de un candidato, aunque >> tampoco se quiere votar por el no, afectando las facultades de decidir de >> manera libre, emitiendo la opinión/posición que los representantes de las >> ALS consideren más beneficiosos para LACRALO. >> >> >> >> 4. En conclusión, el sistema utilizado –desconocemos si intencionalmente >> o por error- ocasiona que los votos que se emitan, sean votos dirigidos, >> afectando la libertad de elección que deberían tener todos los >> representantes de las ALS. >> >> >> >> En base a todo lo anterior, queremos dejar registrado de manera formal, >> la solicitud para que en futuras votaciones de LACRALO, sea modificado el >> sistema de votación utilizado para un correcto y legítimo ejercicio del >> derecho a voto que como representantes de las ALS tenemos. >> >> >> >> Se copia debajo una captura de pantalla del mencionado sistema de >> BigPulse y las opciones de voto habilitadas, y se adjunta al presente como >> documento en formato .pdf. >> >> >> >> Alejandro Pisanty >> >> Fátima Cambronero >> >> -- >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty >> Facultad de Química UNAM >> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico >> +52-1-5541444475 <+52%201%2055%204144%204475> FROM ABROAD >> +525541444475 <+52%2055%204144%204475> DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 >> <+52%2055%204144%204475> >> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty >> Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/ >> 22285/4A106C0C8614 >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty >> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org >> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lac-discuss-es mailing list >> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> >> http://www.lacralo.org >> > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM Av.University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, Http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/5328a2eb12.html --]]

1 0

On The Voting System
by Carlton Samuels May 27, 2017

May 27, 2017

Dear All: I can attest we all have concerns about the voting system, not only just the configurations the BigPulse tool affords us. We also have significantly different concepts on voting and what that means. These concerns go past the philosophical. In English-speaking Caribbean jurisdictions, the law and practice is that when a single candidate is duly nominated for a post and the nomination period is closed, that candidate is deemed elected by acclamation. Under similar circumstances in LACRALO - and as is the case in this election cycle - there is a call for an affirmation vote. For those of us in English-speaking Caribbean jurisdictions, that has always defied logic. In our jurisdictions, the current legal framework recognize 'duly nominated' as meaning that candidate is fit and proper for electing, all pre-requisites applied. Voting is neither compulsory nor open. Remote electronic voting is not possible. Other than the aggregate result, neither is the vote of each person revealed. So under normal circumstances there are only 2 choices; Yes or No. Or, you can deliberately spoil a ballot, like marking both Yes and No. If you don't show up to vote at the place and time appointed, it does not count. You would not have received a ballot anyways. Under LACRALO rules, electronic voting is the normal mode. And every qualified voter gets a virtual ballot. Rule 19 specifically calls for open and transparent voting. The struggle for us is to find a final and common understanding of how a vote should be counted and the value assigned. Even with a new dispensation, we will continue to support an 'open' vote for transparency's sake; current Rule 19. We do not see a problem with a butterfly ballot so long as the names and position sought by the candidates are clear and so long as the tallies are separate for each candidate. We can understand and would indeed support a choice of "Abstain" as useful for the ballot. But there is a real need for a common understanding of how those votes - *Yes/No/Abstain/No choice* - are accounted for electing a candidate. Especially when the virtual ballot is distributed and received! For a ballot distributed and received means "present". In any event, a full discussion is still needed to arrive at a common understanding on all matters voting. -Carlton Samuels ============================== *Carlton A Samuels* *Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================

1 0

VOTE RESULT: LACRALO Regional Election 2017
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org May 27, 2017

May 27, 2017

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: VOTE RESULT: LACRALO Regional Election 2017 Desde: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org [IN] Dear All, Kindly note that the LACRALO candidates endorsement vote is now closed. Please see the result details in the attached PDF document. You may view the result independently under https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=85107Rxm5gahkSVRPh6GhrSu9. To confirm - LACRALO has endorsed the following candidates for their respective positions which begin at the end of the ICANN60 in November 2017: * Humberto Carrasco for the LACRALO Chair position (one-year term) * Maritza Aguero for the LACRALO Secretariat position (one-year term) * Bartlett Morgan for the ALAC Member position (two-year term) * José Ovidio Salgueiro for the ALAC Delegate to the Nominating Committee position (one-year term) [IS] Dear All, Please note that LACRALO's ratification vote has been closed. See the details of the results in the attached PDF document. You can view the results independently under https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=85107Rxm5gahkSVRPh6GhrSu9. To confirm - LACRALO has confirmed the following candidates for their respective positions beginning at the end of ICANN 60 in November 2017: * Humberto Carrasco for the position of President of LACRALO (term of 1 year) * Maritza Aguero for the position of Secretary of LACRALO (term of 1 year) * Bartlett Morgan for ALAC Member status (2 year term) * José Ovidio Salgueiro for the position of Delegate of the ALAC Delegate before the Nominations Committee (term of 1 year) ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Website: atlarge.icann.org < https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann < https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @ < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/15ddc3f90b.html --]]

1 0

VOTE RESULT: LACRALO Regional Election 2017
by ICANN At-Large Staff May 27, 2017

May 27, 2017

[EN] Dear All, Kindly note that the LACRALO candidates endorsement vote is now closed. Please see the result details in the attached PDF document. You may view the result independently under https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=85107Rxm5gahkSVRPh6GhrSu9. To confirm - LACRALO has endorsed the following candidates for their respective positions which begin at the end of the ICANN60 in November 2017: * Humberto Carrasco for the LACRALO Chair position (one-year term) * Maritza Aguero for the LACRALO Secretariat position (one-year term) * Bartlett Morgan for the ALAC Member position (two-year term) * José Ovidio Salgueiro for the ALAC Delegate to the Nominating Committee position (one-year term) [ES] Estimados todos, Por favor note que el voto de ratificación de LACRALO se ha cerrado. Consulte los detalles de los resultados en el documento PDF que se adjunta. Puede ver los resultados independientemente bajo https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=85107Rxm5gahkSVRPh6GhrSu9. Para confirmar - LACRALO ha confirmado los siguientes candidatos para sus respectivas posiciones que comienzan al final de la ICANN 60 en noviembre de 2017: * Humberto Carrasco para la posición de Presidente de LACRALO (termino de 1 año ) * Maritza Aguero para la posición de Secretaria de LACRALO (termino de 1 año) * Bartlett Morgan para la posición de Miembro del ALAC (termino de 2 años) * José Ovidio Salgueiro para la posición de Delegado del ALAC Delegate ante el Comité de Nominaciones (termino de 1 año) ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Utf-8? Q? About_the_system_of_voice = C3 = B3n? =
by hcarrascob＠gmail.com May 27, 2017

May 27, 2017

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =? Utf-8? Q? About_the_system_of_voice = C3 = B3n? = Desde: hcarrascob(a)gmail.com Dear Alejandro, Thank you for your comments. They will be taken into account for the future. Do not It should be borne in mind that this is the first time that all the candidates in The same period, where there were also no contenders. regards 2017-05-26 23:49 GMT-04: 00 Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> : > Acerca del sistema utilizado en las votaciones abiertas > > > > Estimadas/os colegas, > > > > En relación a las votaciones abiertas para cubrir las posiciones de Chair > (Presidente), Secretariat (Secretaría), representante de LACRALO ante ALAC > y representante de LACRALO ante el NomCom, desde ISOC México queremos > expresar nuestra inconformidad con el sistema de BigPulse utilizado para > recoger los votos de los representantes de las ALS de LACRALO: > > > > 1. En primer lugar, la pregunta que se realiza es “Usted ratifica a los > siguientes candidatos para sus posiciones respectivas las cuales empezaran > al final de ICANN60 en Noviembre 2017? (*sic*). > > Técnicamente esta pregunta es incorrecta. LACRALO no se debe pronunciar > por la “ratificación” de candidatos porque no todos se encuentran > actualmente desempeñando el rol en el cual se están postulando como > candidatos. > > La pregunta correcta, y como ya hemos discutido en varias oportunidades en > LACRALO, es “si seleccionamos” a los candidatos postulados para las > respectivas posiciones. > > > > 2. En segundo lugar, se utiliza una sola boleta para todas las posiciones > abiertas, en lugar de disponer una individual para cada posición en la que > se deba emitir el voto. Lo cual es incorrecto ya que se obliga a que se > vote en conjunto por todas las posiciones respecto de las cuales se está > solicitando el voto. Un representante no puede elegir votar en algunas > posiciones y no en otras porque el sistema no se lo permite. > > > > 3. Adicionalmente, las opciones que se encuentran habilitadas para cada > posición son únicamente “sí” y “no”. No se encuentra habilitada la opción > “Abstención”. > > Esto atenta de manera directa contra la posibilidad de expresar, para > alguna posición determinada, que no se está a favor de un candidato, aunque > tampoco se quiere votar por el no, afectando las facultades de decidir de > manera libre, emitiendo la opinión/posición que los representantes de las > ALS consideren más beneficiosos para LACRALO. > > > > 4. En conclusión, el sistema utilizado –desconocemos si intencionalmente o > por error- ocasiona que los votos que se emitan, sean votos dirigidos, > afectando la libertad de elección que deberían tener todos los > representantes de las ALS. > > > > En base a todo lo anterior, queremos dejar registrado de manera formal, la > solicitud para que en futuras votaciones de LACRALO, sea modificado el > sistema de votación utilizado para un correcto y legítimo ejercicio del > derecho a voto que como representantes de las ALS tenemos. > > > > Se copia debajo una captura de pantalla del mencionado sistema de BigPulse > y las opciones de voto habilitadas, y se adjunta al presente como > documento en formato .pdf. > > > > Alejandro Pisanty > > Fátima Cambronero > > -- > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > Facultad de Química UNAM > Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > +52-1-5541444475 <+52%201%2055%204144%204475> FROM ABROAD > +525541444475 <+52%2055%204144%204475> DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 > <+52%2055%204144%204475> > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/ > 22285/4A106C0C8614 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/dcc0e3ed3a.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] RES: Signature MOU LACRALO - LACNIC
by aidanoblia＠gmail.com May 27, 2017

May 27, 2017

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: RES: Signature MOU LACRALO - LACNIC Desde: aidanoblia(a)gmail.com Andrés Piazza presented it at a meeting of LACRALO that I witnessed, but it was Quite objected in that session. Then he followed the process and now culminates So I understand that it is appropriate to congratulate all the participants and for Including the current President and Secretary of the Region, and Which with them culminates the process in a favorable way. Greetings to all Aída The 26 of May of 2017, 23:26, Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> wrote: > Es cierto. Pero creo que los principios de este trabajo se remontan a la > presidencia de AndrÃ©s Piazza. > Desde allÃ, creo que realmente hubo esfuerzos comunes. > Saludos cordiales. > Alberto Soto > > Enviado desde mi iPhone > > El 26 may. 2017, a las 17:51, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrasco(a)cmsz.cl> > escribiÃ³: > > Gracias Sylvia y a todos por aclarar quienes participaron en el esfuerzo > por cerrar este acuerdo. > > Quiero agregar que con Oscar Robles tuvimos una reuniÃ³n en forma posterior > a la firma, donde continuamos afinando los temas concretos en los que > colaborarÃamos en este primer aÃ±o. > > > Esto se comunicarÃ¡ a la lista en su debida oportunidad. > > > Saludos > > Enviado desde mi iPhone > > El 26-05-2017, a las 14:55, <sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org> < > sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org> escribiÃ³: > > Felicitaciones a toda toda la regiÃ³n, esto es un logro que nos llevÃ³ aÃ±os > de trabajo y finalemente es una realidad. > > Muy buena memoria Leon, esto se iniciÃ³ cuando JosÃ© Arce y yo estabamos en > la presidencia. > > Saludos y siempre adelante! > > Sylvia > > > > > > *De:* lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [ > mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org > <lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>] *Em nome de *LeÃ³n > Felipe SÃ¡nchez AmbÃa > *Enviada em:* quarta-feira, 24 de maio de 2017 13:26 > *Para:* Maritza Y. Aguero Minano > *Cc:* lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > *Assunto:* Re: [lac-discuss-es] Firma MOU LACRALO - LACNIC > > > > Muchas felicidades Humberto y Maritza! > > > > Mi reconocimiento tambiÃ©n a quienes trabajaron en que esto fuera posible > en perÃodos anteriores. Gracias Alberto, JosÃ© y Sylvia (hasta donde tengo > memoria). > > > > > > Saludos, > > > > > > > > LeÃ³n > > > > El 24/05/2017, a las 09:44, Maritza Y. Aguero Minano <myaguero(a)msn.com> > escribiÃ³: > > > > Estimados miembros de la Comunidad, > > > > Como fue anunciado en la llamada mensual, el dÃa de hoy se firmÃ³ el MOU de > la referencia. Compartimos algunas fotografÃas del momento. > > > > Saludos, > > > > Humberto Carrasco / Maritza Aguero > > <IMG_1869.JPG><IMG_1867.JPG><IMG_1868.JPG><IMG_1866.JPG>___ > ____________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > Aida Noblia [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/8f8655f2c3.html --]]

1 0

=? Utf-8? Q? About_the_system_of_votaci = C3 = B3n? =
by apisanty＠gmail.com May 26, 2017

May 26, 2017

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: =? Utf-8? Q? About_the_system_of_votaci = C3 = B3n? = Desde: apisanty(a)gmail.com About the system used in open voting Dear colleagues, In relation to the open voting to cover the positions of Chair (Chair), Secretariat (Secretariat), LACRALO representative to ALAC And representative of LACRALO before the NomCom, from ISOC Mexico we want Express our disagreement with the BigPulse system used to To collect the votes of the representatives of the LACRALO ALS: 1. In the first place, the question that is asked is "Do you ratify Candidates for their respective positions which At the end of ICANN60 in November 2017? (*sic*). Technically this question is incorrect.LACRALO should not be pronounced The "ratification" of candidates because not all are currently Playing the role in which they are running as candidates. The right question, and as we have discussed on several occasions in LACRALO, it is "if we select" the candidates nominated for the Respective positions. 2. Second, a single ballot is used for all positions Instead of arranging an individual for each position in which The vote must be cast. Which is incorrect since it is forced to be Vote for all the positions on which Requesting the vote. A representative can not choose to vote in some Positions and not others because the system does not allow it. 3. In addition, the options that are enabled for each Position are only "yes" and "no". The option is not enabled "Abstention". This is a direct attempt against the possibility of expressing, for Position, which is not in favor of a Do not want to vote for the no, affecting the power to decide Manner, issuing the opinion / position that the representatives of the ALS consider more beneficial to LACRALO. 4. In conclusion, the system used - we know whether By error - causes that the votes that are cast, are directed votes, Affecting the freedom of choice that all Representatives of the ALS. Based on all of the above, we want to formally record the Request that in future LACRALO ballots, the Voting system used for the correct and legitimate exercise of the Right to vote as representatives of the ALS. A screenshot of the above BigPulse system is copied below And the voting options enabled, and is attached hereto as Document in .pdf format. Alejandro Pisanty Fatima Cambronero - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, Http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e1f1cde373.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: ICANN News Alert - Call for Volunteers for the Third Review of ICANN Accountability and Transparency (ATRT3) Extended
by apisanty＠gmail.com May 26, 2017

May 26, 2017

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Fwd: ICANN News Alert - Call for Volunteers for the Third Review of ICANN Accountability and Transparency (ATRT3) Extended Desde: apisanty(a)gmail.com Colleagues, Do you find any errors or problems in this call? Alejandro Pisanty ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: ICANN At-Large Staff <be-74984(a)bigpulse.com> Date: Fri, May 26, 2017 at 11:12 AM Subject: [ALAC-Announce] ICANN News Alert - Call for Volunteers for the Third Review of ICANN Accountability and Transparency (ATRT3) Extended To: alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Image: CANN] News Alert https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2017-04-20-en ------------------------------ Call for Volunteers for the Third Review of ICANN Accountability and Transparency (ATRT3) Extended 20 April 2017 Represent the global stakeholder community by participating in ICANN Reviews.Apply today to join the team of global experts that will help Improve the transparency and accountability of ICANN, and ensure it meets Its commitments to the global community. ICANN is seeking volunteers to serve on the third review of ICANN Accountability and Transparency (ATRT 3) < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resource…>. To apply, please click here < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_syste…> [PDF, 2.78 MB] to fill out your Statement of Interest. You may also print Out the Statement of Interest form and submit it to reviews(a)icann.org. The ATRT3 Call for Volunteers was scheduled from 31 January to 21 April 2017. This call is now extended to Friday, 2 June 2017, 23:59 UTC to give More time to community members to learn about this review and submit their Applications. The goal is to have a pool of diverse and skilled applicants For the SO / ACs to select from. All applications and supporting materials Will be published on the public ATRT3 wiki < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_di…> . Selection of the Team Review Under the new Bylaws < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resource…>, Each SO / AC will have an opportunity to nominate up to seven applicants to Serves on the Review Team. An applicant's name will only be presented to the SO / AC identified by the applicant for consideration. After SO / AC nomination Process concludes, all nominations will be provided to the SO / AC leaders to Conduct the selection process for the Team Review according to the Specified expertise and geographic and gender diversity from the Nominations received. The Review Team may contain up to 21 members, plus an ICANN Board member (designated by the ICANN Board). For candidates that are seeking a nomination of an SO or AC, we suggest That you communicate and establish a relationship with the leadership of The respective SO or AC. Context and Chronology The specific objectives for the ATRT3 are to review ICANN's execution of Its commitment to maintain and improve robust mechanisms for public input, Accountability, and transparency to ensure that the outcomes of its Decision-making reflect the public interest and are accountable to the Internet community. ICANN's Accountability and Transparency Review originated under the Affirmation of Commitments in 2009. Effective 1 October 2016, ICANN's Obligation to conduct this review was incorporated into ICANN Bylaws. The Composition of the Review Team will be determined by the ICANN community. For more information, please see Section 4.6. Of the ICANN Bylaws < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resource…> . More information is included in the "Background" section below to provide An overview of events leading up to this Call for Volunteers. Scope of the Accountability and Transparency Review ICANN Bylaws < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resource…> Mandate that the community conduct to periodic Review to assess how ICANN is Executing its commitment to maintain and improve robust mechanisms for Public input, accountability, and transparency. This ensures that the Outcomes of its decision-making reflect the public interest and are Accountable to the Internet community. The focus of the ATRT3 Review may Include, but is not limited to, the following: [ERROR: Sentence too long to translate (2112> 1800 bytes)] Compensation ATRT3 Review Team members will not receive compensation from ICANN for Their service on the team. However, travel, meal and lodging costs for Review Team members who participate in Team Review meetings will be Reimbursed upon request in accordance with ICANN's community support travel Guidelines < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_news_…> . Responsibilities Review Team members will have the following general responsibilities: [ERROR: Sentence too long to translate (1873> 1800 bytes)] Skills and Experience To compose a well-balanced Review Team, ICANN seeks members who, in the Aggregate, possess the following skills and experience: - Performance assessment and audits - Good governance and board performance - Performance measurement - Process improvement - Knowledge of recognized frameworks for organizational excellence - Principles of accountability applicable to organizations broadly Similar to ICANN - Expertise with Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) Work Stream 1 (WS1) and Work Stream 2 (WS2) highly desired Desired Attributes Applicants should possess the following professional and personal Attributes: - Commitment and time to participate - Multistakeholder community understanding - Team spirit, adaptability, consensus-seeking attitude - Willingness to learn - Readiness to contribute - Capacity to reason objectively, putting aside personal opinions or Preconceptions - Analytical skills - Good communication skills using multiple methods and tools Methodology, Budget and Support ICANN will provide the Review Team with a clearly articulated review Budget Throughout the Review, the Review Team will periodically report on Its progress related to planned schedule and budget. ICANN organizational support will be made available to the Team Review. Support will include assistance with project management, organization of Work, documents and activities, and sharing of tools and best practices for Conducting an effective review. English is the working language of the Review Team. Key communications and Documents will be translated in accordance with the ICANN Language Services Policies < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_syste…> [PDF, 277 KB]. Review Team calls are made using Adobe Connect. Background The ICANN Bylaws < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resource…> Stipulate that "The Accountability and Transparency Review shall be Conducted on less frequently than every five years measured from the date The previous Accountability and Transparency Review Team was convened. " That would mean that the Call for Volunteers would take place no later than 4 October 2017.However, prior to the incorporation of this review into the ICANN Bylaws, several events took place leading to ICANN's current Commitment to launch the Call for Volunteers for ATRT3 in January 2017. The information presented below provides an overview of events leading up To this Call for Volunteers. - October 2012 - Call for Volunteers < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resource…> For the Second Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT2). - February 2013 - ATRT2 Review Team announced < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resource…>. - December 2013 - ATRT2 issued Final Report < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_syste…> [PDF, 3.46 MB] and Recommendations. - June 2014 - the ICANN Board of Directors accepted all twelve ATRT2 Recommendations and directed the President and CEO of ICANN, through his Designee (s), to proceed with the implementation - Resolution 2014.06.26.14 < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resource…>. For more information on the status of the implementation activities, please Visit the ATRT2 Implementation Wiki < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_di…>. - July 2015 - In response to community concerns about workload, the ICANN Board delayed the start of ATRT3 until July 2017 via Resolution 2015.07.28.09 < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_resource…>. Note that under the Affirmation of Commitments, reviews were on a shorter Cycle. - January 2016 - In response to concerns raised by The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) about delaying ATRT3 until July 2017, ICANN noted < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_syste…> [PDF, 469 KB] that the Call for Volunteers to form the ATRT3 Review Team Will be launched in January 2017. - August 2016 - the Co-Chairs of the Cross Community Working Group on ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountability) < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_syste…> [PDF, 118 KB] to the ICANN Board, presenting possible options of how to Combine Work Stream 2 (WS2) efforts and the ATRT3 work, to avoid work Duplication. The co-Chairs took this step because the IANA Stewardship Transition was being completed, and the ICANN Community was engaged in WS2 To address issues, many of the WS2 topics were related to issues Expected to be addressed in the ATRT3, ie accountability and Transparency. - October 2016 - The ICANN Board responded. < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_en_syste…> [PDF, 439 KB] that, "It is not up to the Board to dictate the scope of this Important community review. While we share the concerns raised of avoiding ICANN community (1) Have a voice in how the ATRT3 should be scoped in alignment With the Bylaws.The Board and the ICANN Organization stand ready to Support the community's direction. " - December 2016 - the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs contacted the SO / AC Chairs <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/2016-December/…> , Proposing a limited scope for ATRT3 as well as a reduced-size Review Team. ICANN Community agrees with the proposal And rationale, the SO / AC issues a public statement or letter to the ICANN CEO and Board Chair that explains why a limited scope is appropriate And indicate the level of support among the ICANN community for this Limitation. ICANN organization is not aware of any collective community Response to the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chair's note. _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1e9f3dd577.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] RES: Signature MOU LACRALO - LACNIC
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org May 26, 2017

May 26, 2017

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: RES: Signature MOU LACRALO - LACNIC Desde: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org It is true. But I think the principles of this work go back to the presidency of Andres Piazza. From there, I think there were really common efforts. Best regards. Alberto Soto Sent from my iPhone > El 26 may. 2017, a las 17:51, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrasco(a)cmsz.cl> escribió: > > Gracias Sylvia y a todos por aclarar quienes participaron en el esfuerzo por cerrar este acuerdo. > > Quiero agregar que con Oscar Robles tuvimos una reunión en forma posterior a la firma, donde continuamos afinando los temas concretos en los que colaboraríamos en este primer año. > > > Esto se comunicará a la lista en su debida oportunidad. > > > Saludos > > Enviado desde mi iPhone > >> El 26-05-2017, a las 14:55, <sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org> <sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org> escribió: >> >> Felicitaciones a toda toda la región, esto es un logro que nos llevó años de trabajo y finalemente es una realidad. >> Muy buena memoria Leon, esto se inició cuando José Arce y yo estabamos en la presidencia. >> Saludos y siempre adelante! >> Sylvia >> >> >> De: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome de León Felipe Sánchez Ambía >> Enviada em: quarta-feira, 24 de maio de 2017 13:26 >> Para: Maritza Y. Aguero Minano >> Cc: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Firma MOU LACRALO - LACNIC >> >> Muchas felicidades Humberto y Maritza! >> >> Mi reconocimiento también a quienes trabajaron en que esto fuera posible en períodos anteriores. Gracias Alberto, José y Sylvia (hasta donde tengo memoria). >> >> >> Saludos, >> >> >> >> León >> >> El 24/05/2017, a las 09:44, Maritza Y. Aguero Minano <myaguero(a)msn.com> escribió: >> >> Estimados miembros de la Comunidad, >> >> Como fue anunciado en la llamada mensual, el día de hoy se firmó el MOU de la referencia. Compartimos algunas fotografías del momento. >> >> Saludos, >> >> Humberto Carrasco / Maritza Aguero >> <IMG_1869.JPG><IMG_1867.JPG><IMG_1868.JPG><IMG_1866.JPG>_______________________________________________ >> lac-discuss-es mailing list >> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> >> http://www.lacralo.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lac-discuss-es mailing list >> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> >> http://www.lacralo.org > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/40db0d5de6.html --]]

1 0