May 2018 - lac-discuss-en - lists.icann.org

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Sobre dominio "o.com"
by Evin Erdogdu May 14, 2018

May 14, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject:Re: Re: Sobre dominio "o.com" Desde:Evin Erdogdu <evin.erdogdu(a)icann.org> v \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);} or \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);} w \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);} .shape {behavior: url (# default # VML);} Dear All, Comments from the LACRALO community are welcome (in either EN or ES) on the related wiki workspace for the O.COM Public Comment:https://community.icann.org/x/zxoFBQ. Please note you will need to log in to the wiki to use the comment function.If you do not have login credentials or have issues using the wiki, please contactstaff(a)atlarge.icann.org. If you would like to volunteer as a penholder, please let me know. Thank you very much for your engagement. We hope to have a significant contribution from LACRALO on this topic! Kind Regards, Evin From: "Maritza Y.Aguero Minano " <myaguero(a)msn.com> Date: Monday, May 14, 2018 at 6:14 PM To: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> , Silvia Vivanco <silvia.vivanco(a)icann.org> Cc: Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul(a)gutierrez.se> , ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> , LACRALO Spanish <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [lac-discuss-es] About domain "o.com" Dear ICANN Staff, On May 11 we send an email requesting them to open a wiki. It is possible that you can send it to us to be able to pour the contributions and / comments of the community in this one? Thanks and regards, Maritza From: Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 08:46 am To: Maritza Y. Aguero Minano CC: Carlos Raul Gutierrez; ICANN At-Large Staff; LACRALO Spanish Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] About domain "o.com" Thank you very much dear Maritza and happy weekend of the week! Carlos Raúl GUTIERREZ Section 1571-1000 San José COSTA RICA On Fri, May 11, 2018, 07:36 Maritza Y. Aguero Minano <myaguero(a)msn.com> wrote: Dear, Thank you all for the contributions. Given the topic under discussion and that merits further analysis and comments, please ask the Staff to open a wiki so that, in this way, we can place the opinions and / or comments. With the confirmation of this request, we could proceed with the steps indicated by Carlos and other contributions of the community on this subject. Regards, Maritza On May 11 2018, at (s) 07:13, Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul(a)gutierrez.se> wrote: Thanks Alberto for bringing the subject to the table. Thanks Alejandro for giving us the right framework for a good discussion. I suggest that we make this list a discussion in Spanish initially, let's set a deadline with enough time for the secretary to make a summary of our proposal and be translated into English with the necessary information so that our LACRALO colleagues from other languages can have it in time. So I ask the LACRALO secretary to establish this calendar as soon as possible.I would also like to request confirmation that this mailing list and the opinions expressed in it remain in the record of this important topic (Record) and that if a translation is made, I will have the opportunity to edit it before publishing it. some translations cause me a lot of concern. Under these conditions, and given that Alejandro has given the framework for the discussion, I want to make my comments, limiting myself to two additional aspects to those that Alejandro has given me that seem crucial to me: 1. About the allocation process: I want to know where the funds for this auction are going to end up.If they end up in the bottom of the auctions of the last round, I have nothing against. Otherwise you have to ask about that topic as much as possible and look for a consensus opinion within ALAC! 2. On the background of the new single-letter TLD (s): Background: As I participated in the development of the policy for new rounds of TLDs (Subsequent Rounds PDP), I recognize that the opportunity to offer new TLDs is beneficial for all.One of the most relevant results of the CCT Review for me, is that the expansion, more than an increase in the number of registrations, has opened the doors to the replacement of generic registrations towards more specific TLDs. Many new registrations in new TLDs have been made despite the fact that it was available in .com. The main risk of the new TLDs on the other hand, has been the strong tendency to restrict their use based on elements that have not been discussed at the community level, are not based on explicit policies developed within the GNSO and added in the contracts of the records bilaterally.It is more, we do not know yet how it is going to follow the fulfillment of them. As an example I only want to mention the exclusivity restrictions that have been granted to the owners of brands that a re now TLDs, as well as the competition for adding public interest commitments (PICs) in many others, to achieve a better evaluation and their delegation. Therefore: it is my personal position as a member and candidate for a position of choice in this community, that any delegation of new TLDs must be subject to full transparency in the conditions under which they will be able to register domains under that TLD .In these last days a new term has emerged: the intention to use or "intended use". Regardless of whether this is the term that will include in the future all the restrictions or all the public interest commitments of each TLD, it is of vital importance for me to note that my preference is that each and every new TLD have the minimum possible restrictions and are open to any domain registration. This position is based on my deep conviction that the Internet should remain a fully open platform. In this way we must put especialatención to any type of restriction also in the TLDs. Two major groups of restrictions have already been distilled: on the one hand, the brands, with a degree of total exclusivity, as well as TLDs that designate highly regulated sectors. The economic logic of these restrictions is overwhelming. but that is not the reason why we must stop demanding absolute transparency in its application, since in the end they only help reinforce dominant market positions. On the other hand the exclusive rights geographical designations, such as the codes of two letters and the names of large cities.Not only for the regional exclusivity of the same, but also for the use other than the geographic one that has been given to some combinations of two letters, we must have special attention that these TLDs are not used to abuse market positions (prices!) This way my opinion on o.com [o.com] is that if the winner of the auction is going to have a contract with ICANN that guarantees that it is a TLD totally open and free of restrictions, I agree. Otherwise, these contractual restrictions must first pass through the scrutiny of the WHOLE community.I reiterate that this position of a global openness metric also reflects my general position within the Subsequent Procedures PDP. If there are going to be restrictions, these must be very clearly founded. And to date I only know two areas that have that foundation (regardless of whether I agree with it), which are the exclusive use of the marks based on international law and the process of designation and use of geographical names for many reasons beyond that international law that includes the sovereignty of peoples, their cultures and traditions, the human right to free expression, etc. --- Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez On 2018-05-10 20:38, Alberto Soto wrote: Dear, ICANN has just requested an opinion on a domain: "... to release for registration a domain name with a single-character label, OR .COM, in the generic top-level domain .COM (gTLD)". I would like to have the opinion of LACRALO members regarding this issue in their relationship with end users. At some point as ALAC Member, I will have to comment on this.I hope to count on your collaboration so that it is not a personal opinion at its opportune moment. The link of the requirement: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2018-05-10-en [icann.org] Best regards Alberto Soto _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es [atlarge-lists.icann.org ] http://www.lacralo.org [lacralo.org] _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es [atlarge-lists.icann.org ] http://www.lacralo.org [lacralo.org] _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es [atlarge-lists.icann.org] http://www.lacralo.org [lacralo.org] [atlarge-lists.icann.org] http://www.lacralo.org [lacralo.org] [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b13e5c82a4.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] RV: REMINDER - Friday 18 May: Call for Comments: Release for Registration one .COM Domain Name with a Single-Character Label: O.COM
by Maritza Y. Aguero Minano May 14, 2018

May 14, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject:Re: RV: REMINDER - Friday 18 May: Call for Comments: Release for Registration one .COM Domain Name with a Single-Character Label: O.COM Desde:"Maritza Y. Aguero Minano" <myaguero(a)msn.com> Dear Alberto, On May 11 last requested the Staff to support us by opening the respective wiki, as you can see below. Today we reiterate order. From: Maritza Y. Aguero Minano <myaguero(a)msn.com> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 08:36 a.m. To: Carlos Raul Gutierrez CC: Alberto Soto; apisanty(a)gmail.com; LACRALO Spanish; ICANN At-Large Staff Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] About domain "o.com" Dear, Thank you all for the contributions. Given the topic under discussion and that merits further analysis and comments, please ask the Staff to open a wiki so that, in this way, we can place the opinions and / or comments. With the confirmation of this request, we could proceed with the steps indicated by Carlos and other contributions of the community on this subject. Regards, Maritza Regards, Maritza From: lac-discuss-es <lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 09:11 amTo: LACRALO Spanish Subject: [lac-discuss-es] RV: [ALAC-Announce] REMINDER - Friday 18 May: Call for Comments: Release for Registration one .COM Domain Name with a Single-Character Label: O.COM Dear, the ALAC deadline is May 18 at 23:59 UTC. We should have your opinions no later than May 17 at 23:59 UTC. I ask the leadership of LACRALO please indicate the link to the wiki. Best regards Alberto Soto From: ALAC-Announce <alac-announce-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> On behalf of ICANN At-Large Staff Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 06:48 am To: alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Subject: [ALAC-Announce] REMINDER - Friday 18 May: Call for Comments: Release for Registration one .COM Domain Name with a Single-Character Label: O.COM Dear All, Please note the first draft ALAC Statement on Release for Registration one .COM Domain Name with a Single-Character Label: O.COM is ready for your review. The draft, as well as pertinent resources that provide background to this Statement, can be found in its wiki workspace here: https://community.icann.org/x/zxoFBQ. All At-Large members are welcome to comment on this draft. Please take a moment to review this draft and if you have input, please submit it in the wiki workspace using the comment function by Friday, 18 May 2018 at 23:59 UTC. You will need to log in to the wiki to use the comment function. If you don t have a login or have another issue using the wiki, kindly contact staff(a)atlarge.icann.org. Kind Regards, ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Website: atlarge.icann.org Facebook: facebook.com/icannatlarge Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0e45e14b85.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Sobre dominio "o.com"
by Maritza Y. Aguero Minano May 14, 2018

May 14, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject:Re: Sobre dominio "o.com" Desde:"Maritza Y. Aguero Minano" <myaguero(a)msn.com> Dear ICANN Staff, On May 11 we send an email requesting them to open a wiki. It is possible that you can send it to us to be able to pour the contributions and / comments of the community in this one? Thanks and regards, Maritza From: Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 08:46 am To: Maritza Y.Aguero Minano CC: Carlos Raul Gutierrez; ICANN At-Large Staff; LACRALO Spanish Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] About domain "o.com" Thank you very much dear Maritza and happy weekend of the week! Carlos Raúl GUTIERREZ Section 1571-1000 San José COSTA RICA On Fri, May 11, 2018, 07:36 Maritza Y. Aguero Minano <myaguero(a)msn.com> wrote: Dear, Thank you all for the contributions. Given the topic under discussion and that merits further analysis and comments, please ask the Staff to open a wiki so that, in this way, we can place the opinions and / or comments. With the confirmation of this request, we could proceed with the steps indicated by Carlos and other contributions of the community on this subject. Regards, Maritza On May 11 2018, at (s) 07:13, Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul(a)gutierrez.se> wrote: Thanks Alberto for bringing the subject to the table. Thanks Alejandro for giving us the right framework for a good discussion. I suggest that we make this list a discussion in Spanish initially, let's set a deadline with enough time for the secretary to summarize our position and be translated into English as soon as possible so that our LACRALO colleagues in other languages can have it on time. So I ask the LACRALO secretary to establish this calendar as soon as possible.I also want to request confirmation that this mailing list and the opinions that are expressed in it are in the record of this important topic (Record) and that if a translation is made I have the opportunity to edit it before publishing it. some translations cause me a lot of concern. Under these conditions, and given that Alejandro has given the framework for the discussion, I want to make my comments, limiting myself to two additional aspects to those that Alejandro has given me that seem crucial to me: 1. About the allocation process: I want to know where the funds for this auction are going to end up.If they finish in the bottom of the auctions of the last round, I have nothing against. Otherwise you have to ask about that topic as soon as possible and look for a consensus opinion within ALAC! 2. On the background of the new single-letter TLD (s): Background: As I participated in the development of policy for new rounds of TLDs (Subsequent Rounds PDP), I recognize that the segmentation opportunity offered by new TLDs is of benefit to all.One of the most relevant results of the CCT Review for me is that the expansion, rather than an increase in the number of registrations, has opened the doors to the substitution of generic registrations for more specific TLDs. Many new registrations in new TLDs have been made despite the fact that it was available in .com. The main risk of the new TLDs on the other hand, has been the strong tendency to restrict their use based on elements that have not been discussed at the community level, are not based on explicit policies developed within the GNSO and added in the contracts of the registers bilaterally.What's more, we do not know yet how the compliance with them will be monitored. As an example I only want to mention the exclusivity restrictions that have been granted to the owners of brand s that are now TLDs, as well as the competence to add public interest commitments (PICs) in many others, to achieve a better evaluation and their delegation. Therefore: it is my personal position as a member and candidate for a position of choice in this community, that any delegation of new TLDs must be subject to full transparency in the conditions under which they will be able to register domains under that TLD .In recent days a new term has emerged: the intention to use or "intended use". Regardless of whether this is the term that will include in the future all the restrictions or all the public interest commitments of each TLD, it is of vital importance for me to note that my preference is that each and every new TLD have the minimum possible restrictions and are open to any domain registration. This position is based on my deep conviction that the Internet must remain a fully open platform. In this way we must pay special attention to any type of restriction also in the TLDs. Two major groups of restrictions have already been distilled: on the one hand, the brands, with a degree of total exclusivity, as well as TLDs that designate highly regulated sectors. The economic logic of these restrictions is overwhelming. but that is not the reason why we must stop demanding absolute transparency in its application, since in the end they only help reinforce dominant market positions. On the other hand the exclusive rights geographical designations, such as two-letter codes and the names of large cities.Not only for the regional exclusivity of the same, but also for the use other than the geographic that has been given to some combinations of two letters, we must take special care that these TLDs are not used to abuse market positions (prices!) This way my opinion on o.com is that if the winner of the auction is going to have a contract with ICANN that guarantees that it is a TLD totally open and free of restrictions, I agree. Otherwise, these contractual restrictions must first pass through the scrutiny of the WHOLE community.I reiterate that this position of a global metric of "openness" also reflects my general position within the Subsequent Procedures PDP. If there are going to be restrictions, these must be very clearly founded. And to date I only know two areas that have that foundation (regardless of whether I agree with it), which are the exclusive use of trademarks based on current international law and the process of designation and use of geographical names for many reasons beyond international law that includes the sovereignty of peoples, their cultures and traditions, the human right to free expression, etc. --- Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez On 2018-05-10 20:38, Alberto Soto wrote: Dear, ICANN has just required opinion on a domain: to free for registration a domain name with a single-character tag, OR .COM, in the generic top-level domain .COM (gTLD) . I would like to have the opinion of LACRALO members regarding this issue in their relationship with end users. At some point as ALAC Member, I will have to comment on this.I hope to count on your collaboration so that it is not a personal opinion at its opportune moment. The link of the requirement: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2018-05-10-en Best regards Alberto Soto _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org http://www.lacralo.org _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/8b78fa9004.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Sobre dominio "o.com"
by Alejandro Pisanty May 14, 2018

May 14, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject:Re: Sobre dominio "o.com" Desde:Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> Hello, In addition to the discussion on the assignment of single-character domain names under .com (such as o.com), this article offers additional information elements. Note the author's declaration of interest at the end: http://domainincite.com/22986-have-your-say-on-single-character-com-domains Alejandro Pisanty 2018-05-11 7:13 GMT-05: 00 Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul(a)gutierrez.se> : Thanks Alberto for bringing the subject to the table. Thanks Alejandro for giving us the right framework for a good discussion. I suggest that we make this list a discussion in Spanish initially, let's set a deadline with enough time for the secretary to make a summary of our proposal and be translated into English with the necessary information so that our LACRALO colleagues from other languages can have it in time. So I ask the LACRALO secretary to establish this calendar as soon as possible.I would also like to request confirmation that this mailing list and the opinions expressed in it remain in the record of this important topic (Record) and that if a translation is made, I will have the opportunity to edit it before publishing it. some translations cause me a lot of concern. Under these conditions, and given that Alejandro has given the framework for the discussion, I want to make my comments, limiting myself to two additional aspects to those that Alejandro has given me that seem crucial to me: 1. About the allocation process: I want to know where the funds for this auction are going to end up. If they end up in the bottom of the auctions of the last round, I have nothing against.Otherwise you have to ask about that topic as much as possible and look for a consensus opinion within ALAC! 2. On the background of the new single-letter TLD (s): Background: As I participated in the development of the policy for new rounds of TLDs (Subsequent Rounds PDP), I recognize that the opportunity to offer new TLDs is beneficial for all. One of the most relevant results of the CCT Review for me, is that the expansion, more than an increase in the number of registrations, has opened the doors to the replacement of generic registrations towards more specific TLDs.Many new registrations in new TLDs have been made despite the fact that it was available in .com. The main risk of the new TLDs on the other hand, has been the strong tendency to restrict their use based on elements that have not been discussed at the community level, are not based on explicit policies developed within the GNSO and added in the contracts of the records bilaterally. It is more, we do not know yet how it is going to follow the fulfillment of them.As an example I only want to mention the exclusivity restrictions that have been granted to the owners of brands that a re now TLDs, as well as the competition for adding public interest commitments (PICs) in many others, to achieve a better evaluation and their delegation. Therefore: it is my personal position as a member and candidate for a position of choice in this community, that any delegation of new TLDs must be subject to full transparency in the conditions under which they will be able to register domains under that TLD . In these last days a new term has emerged: the intention to use or "intended use".Regardless of whether this is the term that will include in the future all the restrictions or all the public interest commitments of each TLD, it is of vital importance for me to note that my preference is that each and every new TLD have the minimum possible restrictions and are open to any domain registration. This position is based on my deep conviction that the Internet should remain a fully open platform. In this way we must put especialatención to any type of restriction also in the TLDs. Two major groups of restrictions have already been distilled: on the one hand, the brands, with a degree of total exclusivity, as well as TLDs that designate highly regulated sectors. The economic logic of these restrictions is overwhelming. but that is not the reason why we must stop demanding absolute transparency in its application, since in the end they only help reinforce dominant market positions. On the other hand the exclusive rights geographical designations, such as the codes of two letters and the names of large cities.Not only for the regional exclusivity of the same, but also for the use other than the geographic one that has been given to some combinations of two letters, we must have special attention that these TLDs are not used to abuse market positions (prices!) This way my opinion on o.com is that if the winner of the auction is going to have a contract with ICANN that guarantees that it is a TLD totally open and free of restrictions, I agree. Otherwise, these contractual restrictions must first pass through the scrutiny of the WHOLE community.I reiterate that this position of a global openness metric also reflects my general position within the Subsequent Procedures PDP. If there are going to be restrictions, these must be very clearly founded. And to date I only know two areas that have that foundation (regardless of whether I agree with it), which are the exclusive use of the marks based on international law and the process of designation and use of geographical names for many reasons beyond that international law that includes the sovereignty of peoples, their cultures and traditions, the human right to free expression, etc. --- Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez On 2018-05-10 20:38, Alberto Soto wrote: Dear, ICANN has just requested an opinion on a domain: "... to release for registration a domain name with a single-character label, OR .COM, in the generic top-level domain .COM (gTLD)". I would like to have the opinion of LACRALO members regarding this issue in their relationship with end users. At some point as ALAC Member, I will have to comment on this.I hope to count on your collaboration so that it is not a personal opinion at its opportune moment. The link of the requirement: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2018-05-10-en Best regards Alberto Soto _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org http://www.lacralo.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr.Alejandro Pisanty School of Chemistry UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog:http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http: // www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, htt p://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/25b3f5cbdd.html --]]

1 0

REMINDER on Board Public sessions on May 12th
by León Felipe Sánchez Ambía May 11, 2018

May 11, 2018

Dear all, This is a friendly reminder that the Board will be holding two public sessions tomorrow, may 12. The first one will be at 17:30 UTC and the discussion will be on GAC advice on PR Communiqué. The second one will be at 00:30 UTC (13 may) and the discussion will be on the Trademark Clearing House (TMCH). You can join the sessions at: Adobe Connect Link: https://participate.icann.org/board-open/ Participant Code: 5542211258 Additional access numbers: https://www.myrcplus.com/cnums.asp?bwebid=8369444&ppc=5542211258&num=1-605-… These two topics are, I think, of big interest to end users so I encourage you to join these sessions. Kind regards, León Enviado desde mi iPad

2 1

RECORDED/RV: Nominación cargo a elección del NomCom
by Andrea Glandon May 11, 2018

May 11, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject: RECORDED/RV: Nominación cargo a elección del NomCom Desde:Andrea Glandon <andrea.glandon(a)icann.org> v \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);} or \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);} w \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);} .shape {behavior: url (# default # VML);} Dear Maritza, Thank you for your email. Your decitation of your nomination for the ALAC delegate to the NomCom. Kind Regards, Andrea Glandon From: lac-discuss-en <lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of "Maritza Y.Aguero Minano " <myaguero(a)msn.com> Date: Friday, May 11, 2018 at 15:18 To: "lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: [lac-discuss-es] RV: NomCom elected nomination charge Dear Lilian, It is an honor for me to receive your nomination to the proposed position. I receive this nomination with great appreciation because it comes from a professional as outstanding as you. However, and for personal reasons, due to decline it. Also, I take this opportunity to thank all the people who have expressed their support and affection for the different nominations (presented and / or proposals). Greetings, Maritza Agüero From: lac-discuss-es <lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of lilian ivette de luque bruges <lilidebru(a)hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 04:33 pm To: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org CC: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Nomination charge to election from the NomCom Dear members of the Community, I would like to nominate Maritza Aguero, from Peru, to the position of choice of the NomCom. Maritza is the Vice President of AUI PERU, a lawyer by profession and a university professor. As a professional experience, Maritza has two Master's degrees and has been a fellow of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Korean International Cooperation Agency (KOICA), Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), University of California, Davis , among other institutions. Likewise, Maritza has been an ICANN fellow and Coach (Durban 2013, London 2014 and Marrakech 2015) and is the current Secretary of LACRALO, a position that she has been carrying out with outstanding professionalism, which is why I believe that due to her professional experience, it is highly recommended to this charge that I am willing to nominate. Best regard, Lilian Ivette De Luque Bruges Representative ALS Ageia Densi CIO - Consultant digital goverment [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9b0c79d8db.html --]]

1 0

RV: Nominación cargo a elección del NomCom
by Maritza Y. Aguero Minano May 11, 2018

May 11, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: RV: Nominación cargo a elección del NomCom Desde:"Maritza Y. Aguero Minano" <myaguero(a)msn.com> Dear Lilian, It is an honor for me to receive your nomination to the proposed position. I receive this nomination with great appreciation because it comes from a professional as outstanding as you. However, and for personal reasons, due to decline it. Also, I take this opportunity to thank all the people who have expressed their support and affection for the different nominations (presented and / or proposals). Greetings, Maritza Agüero From: lac-discuss-es <lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of lilian ivette de luque bruges <lilidebru(a)hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 04:33 pm To: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org CC: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [lac-discuss-en] Nomination charge to election from the NomCom Dear members of the Community, I would like to nominate Maritza Aguero, from Peru, to the position of choice of the NomCom. Maritza is the Vice President of AUI PERU, a lawyer by profession and a university professor. As a professional experience, Maritza has two Master's degrees and has been a fellow of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Korean International Cooperation Agency (KOICA), Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), University of California, Davis , among other institutions. Likewise, Maritza has been ICANN fellow and Coach (Durban 2013, London 2014 and Marrakech 2015) and is the current Secretary of LACRALO, a position she has been exercising with outstanding professionalism, which is why I believe that due to her professional experience, it turns out to be highly recommended for this position that I am willing to nominate. Best regard, Lilian Ivette De Luque Bruges Representative ALS Ageia Densi CIO - Consultant digital goverment [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4b4c02fe15.html --]]

1 0

RECORDED/ RV: 2018 ALAC and RALO ELECTIONS SELECTIONS AND APPOINTMENT
by Andrea Glandon May 11, 2018

May 11, 2018

Dear Maritza, Thank you so much for your email. Your declination of the ALAC position has been recorded. Kind Regards, Andrea Glandon From: lac-discuss-en <lac-discuss-en-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of "Maritza Y. Aguero Minano" <myaguero(a)msn.com> Date: Friday, May 11, 2018 at 14:59 To: LACRALO discussion list <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: [lac-discuss-en] RV: 2018 ALAC and RALO ELECTIONS SELECTIONS AND APPOINTMENT Dear Vanda, It is an honor for me to receive your nomination for the ALAC Member position I receive it with humble and pride because it comes from you, who are an outstanding professional whose prestige is faultless in the ICANN Community. Since I came to the ICANN world, as a fellow, I have always received your support and cherish, which I may say in public. Nevertheless, and due to personal reasons, I must decline the nomination made, not before thanking you. Also, I will like to take advantage of this space to inform the Community that, from the academic side, I have been developing some activities, which opportunity will be announced, so we can continue growing as a Community. Regards, Maritza Aguero, MSc. De: lac-discuss-en <lac-discuss-en-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> en nombre de Vanda Scartezini <vanda(a)scartezini.org> Enviado: martes, 1 de mayo de 2018 05:51 p. m. Para: ICANN Staff CC: LACRALO list Asunto: [lac-discuss-en] 2018 ALAC and RALO ELECTIONS SELECTIONS AND APPOINTMENT Dear LACRALO member , Dear staff members, Till now, in this nomination process, what I am seeing is a total lack of gender balance, then I will nominate myself to dispute the NOMCOM position. I believe we need a gender balance as well as sub regional balance situation in any election. About my experience: I am an electronic engineer, with specialization on management and certificate on board managing courses in US and Brazil. I have been quite a while in ICANN, as majority of you already know, but my experience goes also out of ICANN in board positions of Not for Profit organizations, as chair and member, participating in the selection process for CEOs and other Board members. For the other side, I have also been chair of NOMCOM back in 2012, member as well, and recently, though not in any formal position, I was member appointed by ALAC to the NOMCOM review, now in the final report. Nowadays I have been work just in the CCWGs (ALAC review, Intercultural Awareness, Outreach and Engagement, Auction Proceeds, NOMCOM review and New gTLD Subsequent Procedures) + LACRALO Governance working group together with other colleagues, though acting as a “rapporteur” just to facilitate the progress of this working group and in the Mediation group. I was member of LACRALO Strategy till last election now a place where Sergio Salinas is our representative. And guess you all also know, I am responsible for DNS Women, a not for profit organization nowadays with almost 400 members (not paid members). The DNS women events during ICANN meeting is sponsored each time for one company, though they pay just for food and drinks. It is up for our group to fight for such sponsorship and organize the event. ICANN doesn’t pay nothing for that, though several staff members as Tanzy, Tereza, Michelle, Gisela, Heidi and others always help in the organization. I will certainly state my Expression of Interests formally during the adequate period. I am also seeing other positions where there is just one candidate. This is not good for a democratic election. Unhappily I am seeing just Tracy from the Caribbean, as the one wanting to participate in this election. Hence, I will also nominate Tracy Hackshaw to ALAC position and to the Secretary Position - it will be for him to accept or not. I believe we need to have a member of Caribbean among LACRALO positions in order to start to run in a way closer to what we had agreed during the Mediation. Even if it is not implemented yet, the concept of rotation and sub regions is quite relevant. Considering also the lack of gender balance and I believe Maritza has been a very effective Secretary, then I would like to also nominate Maritza to ALAC position. Again, is for her to accept or not the nomination. I hope we can have in all position at least 2 candidates to exercise a very democratic and competitive election. Kisses to all Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos.

2 1

2018 ALAC and RALO ELECTIONS SELECTIONS AND APPOINTMENT
by Vanda Scartezini May 11, 2018

May 11, 2018

Dear LACRALO member , Dear staff members, Till now, in this nomination process, what I am seeing is a total lack of gender balance, then I will nominate myself to dispute the NOMCOM position. I believe we need a gender balance as well as sub regional balance situation in any election. About my experience: I am an electronic engineer, with specialization on management and certificate on board managing courses in US and Brazil. I have been quite a while in ICANN, as majority of you already know, but my experience goes also out of ICANN in board positions of Not for Profit organizations, as chair and member, participating in the selection process for CEOs and other Board members. For the other side, I have also been chair of NOMCOM back in 2012, member as well, and recently, though not in any formal position, I was member appointed by ALAC to the NOMCOM review, now in the final report. Nowadays I have been work just in the CCWGs (ALAC review, Intercultural Awareness, Outreach and Engagement, Auction Proceeds, NOMCOM review and New gTLD Subsequent Procedures) + LACRALO Governance working group together with other colleagues, though acting as a “rapporteur” just to facilitate the progress of this working group and in the Mediation group. I was member of LACRALO Strategy till last election now a place where Sergio Salinas is our representative. And guess you all also know, I am responsible for DNS Women, a not for profit organization nowadays with almost 400 members (not paid members). The DNS women events during ICANN meeting is sponsored each time for one company, though they pay just for food and drinks. It is up for our group to fight for such sponsorship and organize the event. ICANN doesn’t pay nothing for that, though several staff members as Tanzy, Tereza, Michelle, Gisela, Heidi and others always help in the organization. I will certainly state my Expression of Interests formally during the adequate period. I am also seeing other positions where there is just one candidate. This is not good for a democratic election. Unhappily I am seeing just Tracy from the Caribbean, as the one wanting to participate in this election. Hence, I will also nominate Tracy Hackshaw to ALAC position and to the Secretary Position - it will be for him to accept or not. I believe we need to have a member of Caribbean among LACRALO positions in order to start to run in a way closer to what we had agreed during the Mediation. Even if it is not implemented yet, the concept of rotation and sub regions is quite relevant. Considering also the lack of gender balance and I believe Maritza has been a very effective Secretary, then I would like to also nominate Maritza to ALAC position. Again, is for her to accept or not the nomination. I hope we can have in all position at least 2 candidates to exercise a very democratic and competitive election. Kisses to all Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos.

2 1

RECORDED/ 2018 LACRALO Nominations
by Andrea Glandon May 11, 2018

May 11, 2018

Dear Tracy, Thank you so much for your email. Your acceptance/declination have been recorded as shown below: ACCEPT - ALAC delegate to the Nominating Committee DECLINE - ALAC Member (representing LACRALO) DECLINE - LACRALO Secretary Kind Regards, Andrea Glandon From: lac-discuss-en <lac-discuss-en-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of "Tracy F. Hackshaw @ Google" <tracyhackshaw(a)gmail.com> Date: Friday, May 11, 2018 at 11:33 To: "lac-discuss-en(a)icann.org" <lac-discuss-en(a)icann.org> Subject: [lac-discuss-en] 2018 LACRALO Nominations [Image removed by sender.] Hi everyone, I am extremely humbled and honoured by the confidence and trust shown in me by members of the At Large/LACRALO community. Vanda - my amazing Music Night and IGF 2015 (João Pessoa) singing colleague - thank you so very much for the multiple nominations - however, my current modality within ICANN (I've been functioning in a Community Improvement/Mentorship role since 2016), especially as it relates to ensuring that I remain focused on ensuring that ICANN's representation levels and quality among underserved groups are increased in an equitable and timely manner - has resulted in my difficult but long considered decision to focus ONLY on the original Nominating Committee seat nomination from Sergio Salinas Porto which I had previously accepted. Once again - thank you sincerely for the nomination Sergio. I commit to working extremely hard to do justice to your, and indeed, LACRALO's confidence in me to participate in the upcoming Nominating Committee. As such, with respect to my nominations, I would like to most respectfully: ACCEPT - ALAC delegate to the Nominating Committee DECLINE - ALAC Member (representing LACRALO) DECLINE - LACRALO Secretary Thank you all once again and I look forward to productive relationships. Best wishes, Tracy Hackshaw [Image removed by sender. Mailtrack][mailtrack.io]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mailtrack.io-3Futm-5Fs…> Sender notified by Mailtrack [mailtrack.io]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mailtrack.io-3Futm-5Fs…>

1 0