May 2018 - lac-discuss-en - lists.icann.org

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large
by Aida Noblia May 24, 2018

May 24, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject:Re: Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large Desde:Aida Noblia <aidanoblia(a)gmail.com> More precisely: I understand that there are two parallel processes: Review of At Large and Mediation in Lacralo .. And I have the feeling that although they are related, when commenting on some comments it is not clear to me if they are talking about one or the other .. The wiki that is created now seems to refer to At Large Review ..? or is it Mediation in LACRALO or is it both? regards Aida On May 24, 2018, 19:15, Aida Noblia <aidanoblia(a)gmail.com> wrote: Excuse me, I'm a little confused. I guess it's because I've been somewhat less attentive to the issues of ICANN and LACRALO, due to some personal issues. My confusion is this: what mediation process are you referring to? I understood that there are 2 processes, one relative to all At Large and another relative to the LACRALO Region. When I read comments it gives me the feeling that there is a mixture of both and now a wiki for the Mediation of At Large is opened. Is it the same as Mediation for LACRALO ..? Excuse my ignorance.It is not clear to me when they refer to one or the other Greetings to all Aida On May 24, 2018, 18:39, Silvia Vivanco <silvia.vivanco(a)icann.org> wrote: Dear Maritza, The wiki page entitled "Motion" has been opened. Note from Contracted Party House (CPH) on At-Large review "/ Motion on" Contracted Party House (CPH) note about about At-Large ". Please send the exact motion as you wish to publish. Thank you very much Best regards, Silvia From: Maritza Y. Aguero Minano [mailto: myaguero(a)msn.com] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 4:19 PM To: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> ; Silvia Vivanco <silvia.vivanco(a)icann.org> Cc: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [Ext] Note from Contracte Party House (CPH) on At-Large Review Dear ICANN Staff, According to Humberto, please open a wiki to be able to process the motion of AlejandroPisanty, seconded by Carlos Raúl Gutierrez. Likewise and, according to what is coordinated with Humberto, the term of ten (10) calendar days of discussion will begin to be counted from the day of today, May 24, 2018, and will end on Sunday, June 2 at 23:59 UTC If there is no consensus, a vote will be called whose details will be communicated within five (5) days after the aforementioned completion period. Thank you. Regards, Maritza From: Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> Date: May 21, 2018, 22:49:15 CLT To: Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> Cc: "lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Note from Contracte Party House (CPH) on At-Large Review Dear, Here is a motion by Alejandro seconded by Carlos Raúl. It is for the foregoing that the corresponding procedure will be given.Therefore, we will submit this motion to 10 days of discussion starting today and if we achieve consensus we will transmit it to ALAC. The deadline expires on Wednesday May 31 at 23:59 UTC. If there is no consensus, a vote will be called whose details will be communicated within 5 days after May 31. Copy to our secretary to coordinate with the staff the opening of a wiki. regards Humberto Carrasco Blanc Lawyer Associate Professor Economic-Commercial Law Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh The 20-05-2018, at 18:49, Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> wrote: In response to a question from one of the readers of this list, I want to clarify that I am 100% in agreement with the following proposal by Alejandor Pisanty "The only way forward is to review ALAC's answers with deep self-criticism, and not let them be officially transmitted in our representation until they are satisfactory, and in parallel, to focus the expenditure of energy, time and other resources of LACRALO to the sutantivas proposals.The representatives and officials of LACRALO must notify the ALAC that a proposal will be prepared and processed as necessary to build it before, during and after the ongoing electoral process, with the commitment of the new entrants to carry it out immediately. " Person for my lack of clarity. As regards the progress of the hemediated mediation process, a separate note is sent to Alejandro adding it to the process and I await your comments. I hope my comments are understood within this spirit Happy week Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez ISOC Costa Rica Chapter skype carlos.raulg +506 8837 7176 ________ Section 1571-1000 COSTA RICA 2018-05-20 11:18 GMT-06: 00 Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul(a)gutierrez.se> : Thanks Alejandro 100% according to your comments On May 20, 2018 10:32:18 AM CST, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: Alberto, Thank you for sharing these two statements of opinion from relevant groups of ICANN.While it is possible to disagree with aspects of each of them, especially the sectarian view that has taken over the NCSG, and others that will surely come, it is also possible to note that the complacency and lack of self-criticism that give rise to the ALAC proposal are being paid at a fair price. This is not without its clear reflection in LACRALO, where the failure of the mediation process manifests itself in the repetition of the vices mentioned in the Review, in which the same old quarrels that gave rise to the conflict have been revived in non-public forums. place to mediation, and above all, to continue without focus on the development of policies, which was the number one agreement of mediation in February 2017.The only way forward is to review ALAC's responses with deep self-criticism, and not allow them to be transmitted officially in our representation until they are satisfactory; and in parallel, focus the expenditure of energy, time and other resources of LACRALO to the proposals sutantivas. The representatives and officials of LACRALO must notify ALAC that a proposal will be prepared and process what is necessary to build it before, during and after the ongoing electoral process, with the commitment of the new entrants to carry it out immediately. Alejandro Pisanty 2018-05-20 10:23 GMT-05: 00 Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> : Dear, in the note of NSCG, this note of the Contracted Party House is mentioned, whose terms are similar for the At-Large Review. It is an unofficial translation and the short link to see the original published in ICANNhttps://goo.gl/NQzaVC [goo.gl] Best regards Alberto Soto May 7, 2018 FAO: Organizational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) of ICANN Board and Cherine Chalaby, Chairman of the ICANN Board Re: Statement of concern for At-Large Review Implementation Implementation Proposal Dear members of Cherine and the Committee: On behalf of the Contracted Party House (CPH) I would like to express our deep concern with the content and intent of the General Proposal for Implementation of the At-Large Review, which was published on April 20, 2018. This proposal follows the 2017 At-Large Review. During the public comment period CPH, among many other SO / AC, sent critical comments that were subsequently included in the recommendations in the final report of ITEMS International. These recommendations, together with the feasibility assessment of the At-Large review and recommendations, and the ICANN staff designed the implementation plan with direct questions for ALAC. The CPH considers that the aforementioned proposal does not address these issues, nor does it respond to the specific criticisms raised in the At-Large review report.In fact, all the recommendations have been rejected or modified. Furthermore, if the proposal is adopted by the OEC and the ICANN Board without the ALAC properly addressing the concerns of the wider ICANN community, this would set an alarming precedent for any future ICANN review. If critical opinions and recommendations, particularly those that are widely supported within the ICANN community, are perceived as ultimately ignorant, The ICANN reviews will lose credibility. The CPH believes that the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the ICANN Board should not consider the ALAC proposal until such time as ALAC provides a detailed response that addresses the criticisms raised by the At-Large review report, and the questions kindly gathered by the ICANN staff. This response must be submitted to the entire ICANN community, so that any additional input or discussion with the community can be arranged, to see the Review to an appropriate end. Yours sincerely, Graeme Bunton Chair RrSG _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es [atlarge-lists.icann.org ] http://www.lacralo.org [lacralo.org] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM Av.Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com [pisanty.blogspot.com] LinkedIn: http: //www.linkedin. com / in / pisanty [linkedin.com] Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 [linkedin.com] Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty [twitter.com] ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org [isoc.org] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es [atlarge-lists.icann.org ] http://www.lacralo.org [lacralo.org] _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es [atlarge-lists.icann.org ] http://www.lacralo.org [lacralo.org] _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es [atlarge-lists.icann.org ] http://www.lacralo.org [lacralo.org] _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org - Aida Noblia - Aida Noblia [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/568c12f52b.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large
by Aida Noblia May 24, 2018

May 24, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject:Re: Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large Desde:Aida Noblia <aidanoblia(a)gmail.com> Excuse me, I'm a little confused. I guess it's because I've been somewhat less attentive to the issues of ICANN and LACRALO, due to some personal issues. My confusion is this: what mediation process are you referring to? I understood that there are 2 processes, one relative to all At Large and another relative to the LACRALO Region. When I read comments it gives me the feeling that there is a mixture of both and now a wiki for the Mediation of At Large is opened.Is it the same as Mediation for LACRALO ..? Excuse my ignorance. It is not clear to me when they refer to one or the other Greetings to all Aida On May 24, 2018, 18:39, Silvia Vivanco <silvia.vivanco(a)icann.org> wrote: Dear Maritza, The wiki page entitled "Motion" has been opened. Note from Contracted Party House (CPH) on At-Large review "/ Motion on" Contracted Party House (CPH) note about about At-Large ". Please send the exact motion as you wish to publish. Thank you very much Best regards, Silvia From: Maritza Y. Aguero Minano [mailto: myaguero(a)msn.com] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 4:19 PM To: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> ; Silvia Vivanco <silvia.vivanco(a)icann.org> Cc: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [Ext] Note from Contracte Party House (CPH) on At-Large Review Dear ICANN Staff, According to Humberto, please open a wiki to be able to process the motion of AlejandroPisanty, seconded by Carlos Raúl Gutierrez. Likewise and, according to what is coordinated with Humberto, the term of ten (10) calendar days of discussion will begin to be counted from the day of today, May 24, 2018, and will end on Sunday, June 2 at 23:59 UTC If there is no consensus, a vote will be called whose details will be communicated within five (5) days after the aforementioned completion period. Thank you. Regards, Maritza From: Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> Date: May 21, 2018, 22:49:15 CLT To: Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> Cc: "lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Note from Contracte Party House (CPH) on At-Large Review Dear, Here is a motion by Alejandro seconded by Carlos Raúl. It is for the foregoing that the corresponding procedure will be given.Therefore, we will submit this motion to 10 days of discussion starting today and if we achieve consensus we will transmit it to ALAC. The deadline expires on Wednesday May 31 at 23:59 UTC. If there is no consensus, a vote will be called whose details will be communicated within 5 days after May 31. Copy to our secretary to coordinate with the staff the opening of a wiki. regards Humberto Carrasco Blanc Lawyer Associate Professor Economic-Commercial Law Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh The 20-05-2018, at 18:49, Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> wrote: In response to a question from one of the readers of this list, I want to clarify that I am 100% in agreement with the following proposal by Alejandor Pisanty "The only way forward is to review ALAC's answers with deep self-criticism, and not let them be officially transmitted in our representation until they are satisfactory, and in parallel, to focus the expenditure of energy, time and other resources of LACRALO to the sutantivas proposals.The representatives and officials of LACRALO must notify the ALAC that a proposal will be prepared and processed as necessary to build it before, during and after the ongoing electoral process, with the commitment of the new entrants to carry it out immediately. " Person for my lack of clarity. As regards the progress of the hemediated mediation process, a separate note is sent to Alejandro adding it to the process and I await your comments. I hope my comments are understood within this spirit Happy week Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez ISOC Costa Rica Chapter skype carlos.raulg +506 8837 7176 ________ Section 1571-1000 COSTA RICA 2018-05-20 11:18 GMT-06: 00 Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul(a)gutierrez.se> : Thanks Alejandro 100% according to your comments On May 20, 2018 10:32:18 AM CST, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: Alberto, Thank you for sharing these two statements of opinion from relevant groups of ICANN.While it is possible to disagree with aspects of each of them, especially the sectarian view that has taken over the NCSG, and others that will surely come, it is also possible to note that the complacency and lack of self-criticism that give rise to the ALAC proposal are being paid at a fair price. This is not without its clear reflection in LACRALO, where the failure of the mediation process manifests itself in the repetition of the vices mentioned in the Review, in which the same old quarrels that gave rise to the conflict have been revived in non-public forums. place to mediation, and above all, to continue without focus on the development of policies, which was the number one agreement of mediation in February 2017.The only way forward is to review ALAC's responses with deep self-criticism, and not allow them to be transmitted officially in our representation until they are satisfactory; and in parallel, focus the expenditure of energy, time and other resources of LACRALO to the proposals sutantivas. The representatives and officials of LACRALO must notify ALAC that a proposal will be prepared and process what is necessary to build it before, during and after the ongoing electoral process, with the commitment of the new entrants to carry it out immediately. Alejandro Pisanty 2018-05-20 10:23 GMT-05: 00 Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> : Dear, in the note of NSCG, this note of the Contracted Party House is mentioned, whose terms are similar for the At-Large Review. It is an unofficial translation and the short link to see the original published in ICANNhttps://goo.gl/NQzaVC [goo.gl] Best regards Alberto Soto May 7, 2018 FAO: Organizational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) of ICANN Board and Cherine Chalaby, Chairman of the ICANN Board Re: Statement of concern for At-Large Review Implementation Implementation Proposal Dear members of Cherine and the Committee: On behalf of the Contracted Party House (CPH) I would like to express our deep concern with the content and intent of the General Proposal for Implementation of the At-Large Review, which was published on April 20, 2018. This proposal follows the 2017 At-Large Review. During the public comment period CPH, among many other SO / AC, sent critical comments that were subsequently included in the recommendations in the final report of ITEMS International. These recommendations, together with the feasibility assessment of the At-Large review and recommendations, and the ICANN staff designed the implementation plan with direct questions for ALAC. The CPH considers that the aforementioned proposal does not address these issues, nor does it respond to the specific criticisms raised in the At-Large review report.In fact, all the recommendations have been rejected or modified. Furthermore, if the proposal is adopted by the OEC and the ICANN Board without the ALAC properly addressing the concerns of the wider ICANN community, this would set an alarming precedent for any future ICANN review. If critical opinions and recommendations, particularly those that are widely supported within the ICANN community, are perceived as ultimately ignorant, The ICANN reviews will lose credibility. The CPH believes that the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the ICANN Board should not consider the ALAC proposal until such time as ALAC provides a detailed response that addresses the criticisms raised by the At-Large review report, and the questions kindly gathered by the ICANN staff. This response must be submitted to the entire ICANN community, so that any additional input or discussion with the community can be arranged, to see the Review to an appropriate end. Yours sincerely, Graeme Bunton Chair RrSG _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es [atlarge-lists.icann.org ] http://www.lacralo.org [lacralo.org] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM Av.Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com [pisanty.blogspot.com] LinkedIn: http: //www.linkedin. com / in / pisanty [linkedin.com] Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 [linkedin.com] Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty [twitter.com] ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org [isoc.org] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es [atlarge-lists.icann.org ] http://www.lacralo.org [lacralo.org] _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es [atlarge-lists.icann.org ] http://www.lacralo.org [lacralo.org] _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es [atlarge-lists.icann.org ] http://www.lacralo.org [lacralo.org] _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org - Aida Noblia [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3753ee0333.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large
by Silvia Vivanco May 24, 2018

May 24, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject:Re: Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large Desde:Silvia Vivanco <silvia.vivanco(a)icann.org> Dear Maritza, The wiki page entitled "Motion" has been opened. Note from Contracted Party House (CPH) on At-Large review "/ Motion on" Contracted Party House (CPH) note about about At-Large ". Please send the exact motion as you wish to publish. Thank you very much Best regards, Silvia From: Maritza Y.Aguero Minano [mailto: myaguero(a)msn.com] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2018 4:19 PM To: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> ; Silvia Vivanco <silvia.vivanco(a)icann.org> Cc: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [Ext] Note from Contracte Party House (CPH) on At-Large Review Dear ICANN Staff, According to Humberto, please open a wiki to be able to process the motion of AlejandroPisanty, seconded by Carlos Raúl Gutierrez. Likewise and, according to what is coordinated with Humberto, the term of ten (10) calendar days of discussion will begin to be counted from the day of today, May 24, 2018, and will end on Sunday, June 2 at 23:59 UTC If there is no consensus, a vote will be called whose details will be communicated within five (5) days after the aforementioned completion period. Thank you. Regards, Maritza From: Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> Date: May 21, 2018, 22:49:15 CLT To: Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> Cc: "lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Note from Contracte Party House (CPH) on At-Large Review Dear, Here is a motion by Alejandro seconded by Carlos Raúl. It is for the foregoing that the corresponding procedure will be given. Therefore, we will submit this motion to 10 days of discussion starting today and if we achieve consensus we will transmit it to ALAC.The deadline expires on Wednesday May 31 at 23:59 UTC. If there is no consensus, a vote will be called whose details will be communicated within 5 days after May 31. Copy to our secretary to coordinate with the staff the opening of a wiki. regards Humberto Carrasco Blanc Lawyer Associate Professor Economic-Commercial Law Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh The 20-05-2018, at 18:49, Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> wrote: In response to a question from one of the readers of this list, I want to clarify that I am 100% in agreement with the following proposal by Alejandor Pisanty "The only way forward is to review ALAC's answers with deep self-criticism, and not let them be officially transmitted in our representation until they are satisfactory, and in parallel, to focus the expenditure of energy, time and other resources of LACRALO to the sutantivas proposals.The representatives and officials of LACRALO must notify the ALAC that a proposal will be prepared and processed as necessary to build it before, during and after the ongoing electoral process, with the commitment of the new entrants to carry it out immediately. " Person for my lack of clarity. As regards the progress of the hemediated mediation process, a separate note is sent to Alejandro adding it to the process and I await your comments. I hope my comments are understood within this spirit Happy week Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez ISOC Costa Rica Chapter skype carlos.raulg +506 8837 7176 ________ Section 1571-1000 COSTA RICA 2018-05-20 11:18 GMT-06: 00 Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul(a)gutierrez.se> : Thanks Alejandro 100% according to your comments On May 20, 2018 10:32:18 AM CST, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: Alberto, Thank you for sharing these two statements of opinion from relevant groups of ICANN.While it is possible to disagree with aspects of each of them, especially the sectarian view that has taken over the NCSG, and others that will surely come, it is also possible to note that the complacency and lack of self-criticism that give rise to the ALAC proposal are being paid at a fair price. This is not without its clear reflection in LACRALO, where the failure of the mediation process manifests itself in the repetition of the vices mentioned in the Review, in which the same old quarrels that gave rise to the conflict have been revived in non-public forums. place to mediation, and above all, to continue without focus on the development of policies, which was the number one agreement of mediation in February 2017.The only way forward is to review ALAC's responses with deep self-criticism, and not allow them to be transmitted officially in our representation until they are satisfactory; and in parallel, focus the expenditure of energy, time and other resources of LACRALO to the proposals sutantivas. The representatives and officials of LACRALO must notify ALAC that a proposal will be prepared and process what is necessary to build it before, during and after the ongoing electoral process, with the commitment of the new entrants to carry it out immediately. Alejandro Pisanty 2018-05-20 10:23 GMT-05: 00 Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> : Dear, in the note of NSCG, this note of the Contracted Party House is mentioned, whose terms are similar for the At-Large Review. It is an unofficial translation and the short link to see the original published in ICANNhttps://goo.gl/NQzaVC [goo.gl] Best regards Alberto Soto May 7, 2018 FAO: Organizational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) of ICANN Board and Cherine Chalaby, Chairman of the ICANN Board Re: Statement of concern for At-Large Review Implementation Implementation Proposal Dear members of Cherine and the Committee: On behalf of the Contracted Party House (CPH) I would like to express our deep concern with the content and intent of the General Proposal for Implementation of the At-Large Review, which was published on April 20, 2018. This proposal follows the 2017 At-Large Review.During the public comment period CPH, among many other SO / AC, sent critical comments that were subsequently included in the recommendations in the final report of ITEMS International. These recommendations, together with the feasibility assessment of the At-Large review and recommendations, and the ICANN staff designed the implementation plan with direct questions for ALAC. The CPH considers that the aforementioned proposal does not address these issues, nor does it respond to the specific criticisms raised in the At-Large review report. In fact, all the recommendations have been rejected or modified.Furthermore, if the proposal is adopted by the OEC and the ICANN Board without the ALAC properly addressing the concerns of the wider ICANN community, this would set an alarming precedent for any future ICANN review. If critical opinions and recommendations, particularly those that are widely supported within the ICANN community, are perceived as ultimately ignorant, The ICANN reviews will lose credibility. The CPH believes that the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the ICANN Board should not consider the ALAC proposal until such time as ALAC provides a detailed response that addresses the criticisms raised by the At-Large review report, and the questions kindly gathered by the ICANN staff. This response must be submitted to the entire ICANN community, so that any additional input or discussion with the community can be arranged, to see the Review to an appropriate end. Yours sincerely, Graeme Bunton Chair RrSG _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es [atlarge-lists.icann.org ] http://www.lacralo.org [lacralo.org] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM Av.Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com [pisanty.blogspot.com] LinkedIn: http: //www.linkedin. com / in / pisanty [linkedin.com] Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 [linkedin.com] Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty [twitter.com] ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org [isoc.org] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es [atlarge-lists.icann.org ] http://www.lacralo.org [lacralo.org] _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es [atlarge-lists.icann.org] http://www.lacralo.org [lacralo.org] [atlarge-lists.icann.org] http://www.lacralo.org [lacralo.org] _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es [atlarge-lists.icann.org ] http://www.lacralo.org [lacralo.org] [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/7a9cb6eab9.html --]]

1 0

Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large
by Maritza Y. Aguero Minano May 24, 2018

May 24, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject: Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large Desde:"Maritza Y. Aguero Minano" <myaguero(a)msn.com> Dear ICANN Staff, As indicated by Humberto, please open a wiki to be able to process the motion of Alejandro Pisanty, seconded by Carlos Raúl Gutierrez. Likewise, and according to what is coordinated with Humberto, the term of ten (10) calendar days of discussion will begin to be computed as of today, May 24, 2018, and will end on Sunday, June 2 at 23: 59 UTC.If there is no consensus, a vote will be called whose details will be communicated within five (5) days after the aforementioned completion period. Thank you. Regards, Maritza From: Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> Date: May 21, 2018, 22:49:15 CLT To: Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> Cc: "lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Note from Contracte Party House (CPH) on At-Large Review Dear, Here is a motion by Alejandro seconded by Carlos Raúl. It is for the foregoing that the corresponding procedure will be given. Therefore, we will submit this motion to 10 days of discussion starting today and if we achieve consensus we will transmit it to ALAC. The deadline is Wednesday, May 31 at 23:59 UTC. If there is no consensus, a vote will be called whose details will be communicated within 5 days after May 31. Copy to our secretary to coordinate with the staff the opening of a wiki. regards Humberto Carrasco Blanc Lawyer Associate Professor Economic-Commercial Law Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh The 20-05-2018, at 18:49, Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> wrote: In response to a question from one of the readers of this list, I want to clarify that I am 100% in agreement with the following proposal by Alejandor Pisanty "The only way forward is to review ALAC's answers with deep self-criticism, and not let them be officially transmitted in our representation until they are satisfactory, and in parallel, to focus the expenditure of energy, time and other resources of LACRALO The proposals and representatives of LACRALO must notify ALAC that a proposal will be prepared and process necessary to build it before, during and after the electoral process underway, with the commitment of the new entrants to carry it out immediately. . " Person for my lack of clarity. As for the progress of the mediation process, I have written a separate note for Alejandro, updating him on the process and I await his comments. I hope my comments are understood in this spirit Happy week Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez ISOC Costa Rica Chapter skype carlos.raulg +506 8837 7176 ________ Section 1571-1000 COSTA RICA 2018-05-20 11:18 GMT-06: 00 Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul(a)gutierrez.se> : Thanks Alejandro 100% according to your comments On May 20, 2018 10:32:18 AM CST, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: Alberto, Thank you for sharing these two statements of opinion from relevant groups of ICANN. While it is possible to disagree with aspects of each of them, especially the sectarian view that has taken over the NCSG, and others that will surely come, it is also possible to note that the complacency and lack of self-criticism that give rise to the ALAC proposal are being paid at a fair price. This is not without its clear reflection in LACRALO, where the failure of the mediation process manifests itself in the repetition of the vices mentioned in the Review, in which the same old quarrels that gave rise to the conflict have been revived in non-public forums. place to mediation, and above all, to continue without focus on the development of policies, which was the number one agreement of mediation in February 2017.The only way forward is to review ALAC's responses with deep self-criticism, and not allow them to be transmitted officially in our representation until they are satisfactory; and in parallel, focus the expenditure of energy, time and other resources of LACRALO to the proposals sutantivas. The representatives and officials of LACRALO must notify ALAC that a proposal will be prepared and process what is necessary to build it before, during and after the ongoing electoral process, with the commitment of the new entrants to carry it out immediately. Alejandro Pisanty 2018-05-20 10:23 GMT-05: 00 Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> : Dear, in the note of NSCG, this note of the Contracted Party House is mentioned, whose terms are similar for the At-Large Review. It is an unofficial translation and the short link to see the original published in ICANN https://goo.gl/NQzaVC Best regards Alberto Soto May 7, 2018 FAO: Organizational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) of ICANN Board and Cherine Chalaby, Chairman of the ICANN Board Re: Statement of concern for At-Large Review Implementation Implementation Proposal Dear members of Cherine and the Committee: On behalf of the Contracted Party House (CPH) I would like to express our deep concern with the content and intent of the General Proposal for Implementation of the At-Large Review, which was published on April 20, 2018. This proposal follows the 2017 At-Large Review. During the public comment period CPH, among many other SO / AC, sent critical comments that were subsequently included in the recommendations in the final report of ITEMS International. These recommendations, together with the feasibility assessment of the At-Large review and recommendations, and the ICANN staff designed the implementation plan with direct questions for ALAC. The CPH considers that the aforementioned proposal does not address these issues, nor does it respond to the specific criticisms raised in the At-Large review report.In fact, all the recommendations have been rejected or modified. Furthermore, if the proposal is adopted by the OEC and the ICANN Board without the ALAC properly addressing the concerns of the wider ICANN community, this would set an alarming precedent for any future ICANN review. If critical opinions and recommendations, particularly those that are widely supported within the ICANN community, are perceived as ultimately ignorant, The ICANN reviews will lose credibility. The CPH believes that the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the ICANN Board should not consider the ALAC proposal until such time as ALAC provides a detailed response that addresses the criticisms raised by the At-Large review report, and the questions kindly gathered by the ICANN staff. This response must be submitted to the entire ICANN community, so that any additional input or discussion with the community can be arranged, to see the Review to an appropriate end. Yours sincerely, Graeme Bunton Chair RrSG _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM Av.Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog:http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http: // www.isoc.org . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http ://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/facc470291.html --]]

1 0

IMPORTANT - Extension of the voting period
by Maritza Y. Aguero Minano May 24, 2018

May 24, 2018

<DNT> Dear all, For your information. Regards, --- Estimados miembros de la Comunidad, Enviamos, para su información, este importante mensaje Saludos, <DNT> ________________________________ De: Evin Erdogdu <evin.erdogdu(a)icann.org> Enviado: miércoles, 23 de mayo de 2018 03:58 p. m. Asunto: Re: [Ext] Extension of the voting period Dear Humberto, To confirm, vote reminders were sent out to all those who have not yet voted in the (4) LACRALO votes, with noted extension to 26 May. Thank you, Evin

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Recordatorio urgente votación LACRALO
by Humberto Carrasco May 23, 2018

May 23, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject:Re: Recordatorio urgente votación LACRALO Desde:Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> Alberto, The extension email has already been sent. We are also insisting on credentials. Hugs Humberto Carrasco Blanc Lawyer Associate Professor Economic-Commercial Law Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh On 05-23-2018, at 5:57 PM, Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> wrote: Dear Humberto, another organization has just informed me that you have not received the credentials yet. At this time at this moment. Already sent mail to the Staff. Best regards Alberto From: Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 11:00 am To: Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> CC: Carlos Dionisio Aguirre <carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com> ; Antonio Medina Gómez <amedinagomez(a)gmail.com> ; staff(a)atlarge.icann.org; lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Urgent reminder vote LACRALO Importance: High Dear Alberto, Personally, I think it's reasonable. I'll review the statutes and see if there's a problem with it. regards Humberto Carrasco Blanc Lawyer Associate Professor Economic-Commercial Law Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh On 05-23-2018, at 10:55, Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> wrote: Dear Humberto, due to the various inconveniences and that still some or some of them have not been resolved, I request that the closure of the vote be extended for 48 hours, in order to enable all our representatives have the opportunity to cast their four votes . Best regards Alberto Soto From: lac-discuss-es <lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> On behalf of carlos dionisio aguirre Posted on Tuesday, May 22, 2018 08:41 pmTo: Antonio Medina Gómez <amedinagomez(a)gmail.com> ; Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> CC: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org; LACRALO Spanish <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Urgent reminder vote LACRALO This has happened with several organizations. It is a sensitive problem that must be resolved as soon as possible. Carlos Dionisio Aguirre Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message -------- From: Antonio Medina Gómez <amedinagomez(a)gmail.com> Date: 5/22/18 5:20 PM (GMT-03: 00) To: Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> Cc: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org, LACRALO Spanish <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Urgent reminder vote LACRALO I have already made several requests. To the staff, Silvia Vivanco, Maritza and Humberto. Sunday, Monday and Tuesday I have been requesting the credentials but they have not arrived. There is also no email explaining or clarifying what the situation is. On other occasions there have been no problems.They will have an explanation for faults or delays. Antonio Medina Gómez The sea, May 22, 2018 3:13 pm, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> wrote: Dear friends: We want to remind you that the voting process in LACRALO closes on May 24 at 23: 59UTC. There are several members who have not received their 4 credentials for the respective positions. If this is your case, please send an email urgently to staff(a)atlarge.icann.org with copy of our secretary Maritza that is copied in this email and to me. regards _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/918f846401.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Recordatorio urgente votación LACRALO
by Humberto Carrasco May 23, 2018

May 23, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject:Re: Recordatorio urgente votación LACRALO Desde:Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> Dear Alberto, Personally, I think it's reasonable. I'll review the statutes and see if there's a problem with it. regards Humberto Carrasco Blanc Lawyer Associate Professor Economic-Commercial Law Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh On 05-23-2018, at 10:55, Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> wrote: Dear Humberto, due to the various inconveniences and that still some or some of them have not been resolved, I request that the closure of the vote be extended for 48 hours, in order to enable all our representatives have the opportunity to cast their four votes . Best regards Alberto Soto From: lac-discuss-es <lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> On behalf of carlos dionisio aguirre Posted on Tuesday, May 22, 2018 08:41 pmTo: Antonio Medina Gómez <amedinagomez(a)gmail.com> ; Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> CC: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org; LACRALO Spanish <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Urgent reminder vote LACRALO This has happened with several organizations. It is a sensitive problem that must be resolved as soon as possible. Carlos Dionisio Aguirre Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message -------- From: Antonio Medina Gómez <amedinagomez(a)gmail.com> Date: 5/22/18 5:20 PM (GMT-03: 00) To: Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> Cc: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org, LACRALO Spanish <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Urgent reminder vote LACRALO I have already made several requests. To the staff, Silvia Vivanco, Maritza and Humberto. Sunday, Monday and Tuesday I have been requesting the credentials but they have not arrived. There is also no email explaining or clarifying what the situation is. On other occasions there have been no problems.They will have an explanation for faults or delays. Antonio Medina Gómez The sea, May 22, 2018 3:13 pm, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> wrote: Dear friends: We want to remind you that the voting process in LACRALO closes on May 24 at 23: 59UTC. There are several members who have not received their 4 credentials for the respective positions. If this is your case, please send an email urgently to staff(a)atlarge.icann.org with copy of our secretary Maritza that is copied in this email and to me. regards _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c9df0dd503.html --]]

1 0

REMINDER / Important Webinar Invitation | 2018 - Fourth Capacity Building Webinar | 23 May 2018 from 13:00-14:30 UTC
by ICANN At-Large Staff May 23, 2018

May 23, 2018

If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<file:///composeviewinternalloadurl/staff@atlarge.icann.org> with your preferred number. Also find attached, Webex instructions. Español después de la version en inglés Version francaise en bas du mail ********************* Dear All, On behalf of Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Capacity Building Working Group, we would like to invite you to join the fourth webinar of the new At-Large Capacity Building Program – 2018<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…> on the Topic of "New gTLD: Geographic Names (WT 5)” [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…> The objective of this webinar is to update the At-Large Community regarding the work of the Geographic Names in the new gTLD Subsequent Procedure Process (Work Track 5) and the various conclusions of the WT5 before the issue of its initial report. The trainers will be Cheryl Langdon-Orr [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_di…> and Javier Rúa Jovet [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_pa…> The webinar is scheduled on Wednesday, 23 May 2018 from 13:00-14:30 UTC (90 minutes). For other times: https://tinyurl.com/ycqnhalm The draft agenda and call details are available at: https://community.icann.org/x/-R0FBQ French and Spanish interpretation will be provided. ADIGO Conference ID’s: EN: 1638 ES: 1738 FR: 1838 ADIGO Toll Free numbers: http://www.adigo.com/icann<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adigo.com_icann&d=D…> New Web conference tool: Webex- participant guide attached Please join the meeting room here: 1. Click here [mytrials.webex.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mytrials.webex.com_myt…> to join the online event. Or copy and paste the following link to a browser: https://mytrials.webex.com/mytrials/onstage/g.php?MTID=e0366a021fb6aab48111… 2. Click "Join Now". WebEx Audio connection: It’s possible to connect via WebEx VoIP, but audio quality cannot be guaranteed. We recommend you connect to the audio bridge with your telephone. To receive a call back, provide your phone number when you join the event, or call the number below and enter the access code. USA Toll: 1-240-454-0879 Global call-in numbers: https://mytrials.webex.com/mytrials/globalcallin.php?serviceType=EC&ED=6625…<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mytrials.webex.com_myt…> Access code: 924 411 352 If you require a dial-out, please contact At-Large Staff at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<applewebdata://7A10FE21-3394-495B-A5F0-7E30855046D9/staff@atlarge.icann.org> with your preferred number. Thank you. Kind regards, ***************** Estimados todos, En nombre de Tijani Ben Jemaa, Presidente del grupo de trabajo de Creación de Capacidades, nos gustaría invitarles al cuarto webinar del nuevo programa At-Large Capacity Building Program – 2018 [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…>con el tema de: "New gTLD: Geographic Names (WT 5)” [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…> / "Nuevos gTLD: nombres geográficos (WT 5)" El objetivo de este seminario web es actualizar la Comunidad At-Large con respecto al trabajo de los Nombres geográficos en el Proceso de procedimiento posterior de nuevos gTLD (Tema 5) y las diversas conclusiones del WT5 antes de la publicación de su informe inicial. Los facilitadores de capacitación serán: Cheryl Langdon-Orr [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_di…> y Javier Rúa Jovet [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_pa…> El seminario web está programado para el miércoles, 23 de mayo a las 13:00-14:30 UTC (90 minutos). Para consultas de otros horarios: https://tinyurl.com/ycqnhalm [tinyurl.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tinyurl.com_ycqnhalm&d…> Los detalles de la agenda se encuentran disponibles en: https://community.icann.org/x/-R0FBQ [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…> Las interpretaciones en francés y español serán ofrecidas durante la llamada. Conference ID’s: EN: 1638 ES: 1738 FR: 1838 Nueva herramienta de conferencia web: Webex Por favor, únase a la sala de reuniones aquí: 1. Clic aqui [mytrials.webex.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mytrials.webex.com_myt…>para unirse al evento en línea. * O copie y pegue el siguiente enlace a un navegador: https://mytrials.webex.com/mytrials/onstage/g.php?MTID=e0366a021fb6aab48111… [mytrials.webex.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mytrials.webex.com_myt…> 1. Haz clic en "Join now". Conexión de audio WebEx: Es posible conectarse a través de WebEx VoIP, pero no se puede garantizar la calidad de audio. Le recomendamos que se conecte al puente de audio con teléfono. Para recibir una devolución de llamada, proporcione su número de teléfono cuando se una al evento. Si desea una llamada d’ADIGO, por favor solicítela al Staff de At-Large at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<applewebdata://7A10FE21-3394-495B-A5F0-7E30855046D9/staff@atlarge.icann.org> con su número de preferencia. Muchas gracias, Saludos cordiales, ********************** Cher Tous, Au nom de Tijani Ben Jemaa, président du groupe de travail de Renforcement des Capacités At-Large, nous aimerions vous inviter à participer au quatrième webinaire de cette nouvelle serie At-Large Capacity Building Program – 2018 sur le sujet: "New gTLD: Geographic Names (WT 5)” [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…> / "Nouveau gTLD: Noms géographiques (WT 5)" L'objectif de ce webinaire est de mettre à jour la communauté At-Large concernant le travail des noms géographiques dans le processus de Procédure Subséquente des Nouveaux gTLD (piste de travail 5) et les différentes conclusions du WT5 avant la publication de son rapport initial. Les présentateurs seront : Cheryl Langdon-Orr [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_di…> et Javier Rúa Jovet [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_pa…> Le webinaire est programé le mercredi 23 mai 2018 de 13:00 à 14:30 UTC (90 minutes). Pour d’autres horaires: https://tinyurl.com/ycqnhalm [tinyurl.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tinyurl.com_ycqnhalm&d…> L’ordre du jour et les details de l’appel sont disponibles à: https://community.icann.org/x/-R0FBQ [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…> ADIGO Codes conference: EN: 1638 ES: 1738 FR: 1838 Numérons d’appel ADIGO: http://www.adigo.com/icann [adigo.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adigo.com_icann&d=D…> Nouvel Outil (à la place d’Adobe Connect): WebEx Merci de vous joindre à la salle de reunion ici: 1. Cliquez ici [mytrials.webex.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mytrials.webex.com_myt…> pour vous joindre à l’événement en ligne Or copiez et collez le lien suivant dans un navigateur: https://mytrials.webex.com/mytrials/onstage/g.php?MTID=e0366a021fb6aab48111… [mytrials.webex.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mytrials.webex.com_myt…> 2. Cliquez sur "Join Now". Connexion Audio WebEx: C’est possible de se connecter via WebEx VoIP, mais la qualité de l’audio n’est pas garantie. Nous vous recommendons de vous connecter au pont audio avec votre téléphone. Pour recevoir un appel, indiquez votre numero de téléphone lorsque vous joignez l’evenement. Si vous avez besoin que l’opératrice ADIGO vous appelle, merci de confirmer au staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> votre numéro d’appel par retour d’email. (NE PAS mettre la liste en copie). Merci. Cordialement, ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Website: atlarge.icann.org[atlarge.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__atlarge.icann.org_&d=D…> Facebook: facebook.com/icann[facebook.com]atlarge[facebook.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_icann…> Twitter: @[twitter.com]ICANNAtLarge[twitter.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ICANNAtLar…> [cid:image001.png@01D3F108.9A05F370]

1 1

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Recordatorio urgente votación LACRALO
by carlos dionisio aguirre May 22, 2018

May 22, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject:Re: Recordatorio urgente votación LACRALO Desde:carlos dionisio aguirre <carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com> This has happened with several organizations. It is a sensitive problem that must be resolved as soon as possible. Carlos Dionisio Aguirre Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message -------- From: Antonio Medina Gómez <amedinagomez(a)gmail.com> Date: 5/22/18 5:20 PM (GMT-03: 00) To: Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> Cc: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org, LACRALO Spanish <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Urgent reminder vote LACRALO I have already made several requests. To the staff, Silvia Vivanco, Maritza and Humberto. Sunday, Monday and Tuesday I have been requesting the credentials but they have not arrived. There is also no email explaining or clarifying what the situation is. On other occasions there have been no problems.They will have an explanation for faults or delays. Antonio Medina Gómez The sea, May 22, 2018 3:13 pm, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> wrote: Dear friends: We want to remind you that the voting process in LACRALO closes on May 24 at 23: 59UTC. There are several members who have not received their 4 credentials for the respective positions. If this is your case, please send an email urgently to staff(a)atlarge.icann.org with copy of our secretary Maritza that is copied in this email and to me. regards _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/a76999a5a3.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Recordatorio urgente votación LACRALO
by Silvia Vivanco May 22, 2018

May 22, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject:Re: Recordatorio urgente votación LACRALO Desde:Silvia Vivanco <silvia.vivanco(a)icann.org> Dear members of LACRALO, Please check your "SPAM" or "JUNK" email folders to make sure that the credentials email has not reached those folders. If you do not find it please contact Evin evin.erdogdu(a)icann.org and copy the staff to re-send the credentials. Thank you very much! Best regards, Silvia Silvia Vivanco Manager, At Large Regional Affairs ICANN | Internet Corporationfor Assigned Names and Numbers www.icann.org From: lac-discuss-es [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Humberto Carrasco Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 3:28 PM To: Antonio Medina Gómez <amedinagomez(a)gmail.com> Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> ; LACRALO Spanish <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Urgent reminder vote LACRALO Antonio, Sent from my iPhone On 05-22-2018, at 4:20 PM, Antonio Medina Gómez <amedinagomez(a)gmail.com> wrote: I have already made several requests. To the staff, Silvia Vivanco, Maritza and Humberto. The sea, May 22, 2018 3:13 pm, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> wrote: There are several members who have not received their credentials for the respective positions. If this is your case, please send an email urgently to astaff(a)atlarge.icann.org with copy of our secretary Maritza that is copied in this email and to me. regards _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es [atlarge-lists.icann.org] http://www.lacralo.org [lacralo.org] [atlarge-lists.icann.org] http://www.lacralo.org [lacralo.org] [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ee454678bc.html --]]

1 0