May 2018 - lac-discuss-en - lists.icann.org

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large
by Humberto Carrasco May 22, 2018

May 22, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject:Re: Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large Desde:Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> Dear, Here is a motion by Alejandro seconded by Carlos Raúl. It is for the foregoing that the corresponding procedure will be given. Therefore, we will submit this motion to 10 days of discussion starting today and if we achieve consensus we will transmit it to ALAC. The deadline is Wednesday, May 31 at 23:59 UTC.If there is no consensus, a vote will be called whose details will be communicated within 5 days after May 31. Copy to our secretary to coordinate with the staff the opening of a wiki. regards Humberto Carrasco Blanc Lawyer Associate Professor Economic-Commercial Law Universidad Católica del Norte - Coquimbo LLM Queen Mary University of London PhD University of Edinburgh The 20-05-2018, at 18:49, Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> wrote: In response to a question from one of the readers of this list, I want to clarify that I am 100% in agreement with the following proposal by Alejandor Pisanty "The only way forward is to review ALAC's answers with deep self-criticism, and not let them be officially transmitted in our representation until they are satisfactory, and in parallel, to focus the expenditure of energy, time and other resources of LACRALO to the sutantivas proposals.The representatives and officials of LACRALO must notify the ALAC that a proposal will be prepared and processed as necessary to build it before, during and after the ongoing electoral process, with the commitment of the new entrants to carry it out immediately. " Person for my lack of clarity. As for the progress of the mediation process, I have written a separate note for Alejandro, updating him on the process and I await his comments. I hope my comments are understood in this spirit Happy week Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez ISOC Costa Rica Chapter skype carlos.raulg +506 8837 7176 ________ Section 1571-1000 COSTA RICA 2018-05-20 11:18 GMT-06: 00 Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul(a)gutierrez.se> : Thanks Alejandro 100% according to your comments On May 20, 2018 10:32:18 AM CST, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: Alberto, Thank you for sharing these two statements of opinion from relevant groups of ICANN.While it is possible to disagree with aspects of each of them, especially the sectarian view that has taken over the NCSG, and others that will surely come, it is also possible to note that the complacency and lack of self-criticism that give rise to the ALAC proposal are being paid at a fair price. This is not without its clear reflection in LACRALO, where the failure of the mediation process manifests itself in the repetition of the vices mentioned in the Review, in which the same old quarrels that gave rise to the conflict have been revived in non-public forums. place to mediation, and above all, to continue without focus on the development of policies, which was the number one agreement of mediation in February 2017.The only way forward is to review ALAC's responses with deep self-criticism, and not allow them to be transmitted officially in our representation until they are satisfactory; and in parallel, focus the expenditure of energy, time and other resources of LACRALO to the proposals sutantivas. The representatives and officials of LACRALO must notify ALAC that a proposal will be prepared and process what is necessary to build it before, during and after the ongoing electoral process, with the commitment of the new entrants to carry it out immediately. Alejandro Pisanty 2018-05-20 10:23 GMT-05: 00 Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> : Dear, in the note of NSCG, this note of the Contracted Party House is mentioned, whose terms are similar for the At-Large Review. It is an unofficial translation and the short link to see the original published in ICANNhttps://goo.gl/NQzaVC Best regards Alberto Soto May 7, 2018 FAO: Organizational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) of ICANN Board and Cherine Chalaby, Chairman of the ICANN Board Re: Statement of concern for At-Large Review Implementation Implementation Proposal Dear members of Cherine and the Committee: On behalf of the Contracted Party House (CPH) I would like to express our deep concern with the content and intent of the General Proposal for Implementation of the At-Large Review, which was published on April 20, 2018. This proposal follows the 2017 At-Large Review.During the public comment period CPH, among many other SO / AC, sent critical comments that were subsequently included in the recommendations in the final report of ITEMS International. These recommendations, together with the feasibility assessment of the At-Large review and recommendations, and the ICANN staff designed the implementation plan with direct questions for ALAC. The CPH considers that the aforementioned proposal does not address these issues, nor does it respond to the specific criticisms raised in the At-Large review report. In fact, all the recommendations have been rejected or modified.Furthermore, if the proposal is adopted by the OEC and the ICANN Board without the ALAC properly addressing the concerns of the wider ICANN community, this would set an alarming precedent for any future ICANN review. If critical opinions and recommendations, particularly those that are widely supported within the ICANN community, are perceived as ultimately ignorant, The ICANN reviews will lose credibility. The CPH believes that the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the ICANN Board should not consider the ALAC proposal until such time as ALAC provides a detailed response that addresses the criticisms raised by the At-Large review report, and the questions kindly gathered by the ICANN staff. This response must be submitted to the entire ICANN community, so that any additional input or discussion with the community can be arranged, to see the Review to an appropriate end. Yours sincerely, Graeme Bunton Chair RrSG _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM Av.Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog:http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http: // www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http ://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/850ae891ea.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] [lac-discuss-es] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] REMINDER / Meeting Invitation: ALAC Monthly Call on Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 12:00 UTC
by Vanda Scartezini May 21, 2018

May 21, 2018

You are right Ricardo. As part of the review team, we had a lot of cross community discussion with all RALOs, with other members of ICANN community and hours of discussion with ITEM members. I believe the text we had written was the best solution to incorporate what ITEMS report said and is feasible and adherent to RALOs’ community and other changes that after those discussion was relevant to incorporate. Kisses Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. From: "lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of "Ricardo Holmquist (rihogris(a)gmail.com)" <rihogris(a)gmail.com> Date: Monday, May 21, 2018 at 10:04 To: Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> Cc: "lac-discuss-en(a)icann.org" <lac-discuss-en(a)icann.org>, "lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] REMINDER / Meeting Invitation: ALAC Monthly Call on Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 12:00 UTC Dear Carlos Raul, The point is not in agenda, but for sure we can arise it as an AOB item. In other hand, the actual answer from Alan Greenberg is that the NCSG letter is not official, and that once official, ALAC will answer it. IMHO both letters were written with more hate than real toughs. I might agree that the external review have some trues, but my first reading a while ago is that it also contains a bunch of missinformation and half trues (reading both letters, I can find where they came from). It was the work of a lot of people, not only from ALAC, but from all the RALOs, involved in the preparation of the answer, also there were at least two comment periods, and the opportunity to submit comments to the LACRALO or ALAC working on it (I was not in ALAC, nor in the WG, altough I send several comments at the time). This is almost in the final steps of approval (or not) from the Board, to begin an implementation plan, where for sure, we all need to put more than a grain of sand to make it work, not only for ALAC, but importantly for LACRALO. Sincerely Ricardo Holmquist On Mon, 21 May 2018 at 13:50, Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org<mailto:crg@isoc-cr.org>> wrote: To our LACRALO representatives in ALAC, I kindly request to our members in ALAC, to take the opportunity of this call and discuss the CPH letter of 7 May to the ICANN Chairman on the ALAC Implementation Overview Proposal, Approved by the ALAC, 20 April 2018 (both attached for your convenience). Under any circumstance (not only present budgetary constrains) this letter from a GNSO constituency as very relevant to our past and future work, and we should be have all elements for a serious discussion on our next LACRALO call on 28 May. Happy week to all Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez ISOC Costa Rica Chapter skype carlos.raulg +506 8837 7176 ________ Apartado 1571-1000 COSTA RICA ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>> Date: Mon, May 21, 2018 at 4:31 AM Subject: [ALAC-Announce] REMINDER / Meeting Invitation: ALAC Monthly Call on Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 12:00 UTC To: ALAC Announce <alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org>> Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>> If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> with your preferred number. Also find attached, WebEx instructions. Dear All, The May ALAC Monthly Call is scheduled for Tuesday, 22 May 2018 from 12:00 – 14:00 UTC. For other times: https://tinyurl.com/y83uvmen The agenda (to be updated) and call details are available at: https://community.icann.org/x/OxoFBQ New Connection Information New Web Conference Tool: Webex Please join the meeting room here: 1. Click here [mytrials.webex.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mytrials.webex.com_myt…> to join the online event. Or copy and paste the following link to a browser: https://mytrials.webex.com/mytrials/onstage/g.php?MTID=e6c65cd92f8fb4373cc6… 2. Click "Join Now". Audio Connection: To receive a call back, provide your phone number when you join the event, or call the number below and enter the access code. USA Toll: 1-240-454-0879 Global call-in numbers: https://mytrials.webex.com/mytrials/globalcallin.php?serviceType=EC&ED=6697… Access code: 926 423 814 Conference ID’s: English: 1638 Spanish: 1738 French: 1838 Russian: 2138 Dial-in numbers: http://adigo.com/icann/ If you are unable to attend the call please send an email indicating your absence and we will note this information on the agenda. If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Thank you. Kind Regards, ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Website: atlarge.icann.org Facebook: facebook.com/icannatlarge Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge [cid:image001.png@01D3F12B.0E86F650] _______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org

1 0

RES: Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large
by sylvia＠internautabrasil.org May 21, 2018

May 21, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject: RES: Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large Desde:<sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org> v \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);} or \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);} w \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);} .shape {behavior: url (# default # VML);} Hello Alberto, How are you? Could you explain and explain to all those who did not have the opportunity to participate in the mediation process personally both in Los Angeles in 2017 and in Puerto Rico in 2018, why do you think Mediation was a failure ??? I really do not understand, because both you and other members of LACRALO who were in the meetings did not comment at all in this respect at any time and specifically because at the end of each meeting there was a final moment so that everyone could express themselves about what they had experienced. the meetings. Especially in the meeting in Puerto Rico, very good ideas emerged and the understanding between the parties was excellent (at least that is how those present showed up). That is why I can not understand the CATEGORICAL manifestations that you and other members are manifesting in the list. This type of attitude confuses the rest of the community, when they receive news and comments from the meetings and suddenly messages appear on the list talking about the failure of the mediation process. And on the other hand, the process is not over yet! I personally believe that all the effort that Rodrigo de la Parra, the staff, the mediators, Humberto and Maritza and members of the participating community are genuine and productive. And I do believe in the mediation process as the only solution found by all after years of conflict. I would also like to know if someone has or wants to propose another solution, without a doubt that it will be welcomed by all. I believe that what we should do now is to tell, clarify and debate among all the community what we discussed and proposed in PR and continue working so that all the efforts placed in this mediation they have the result that we all want and not confuse the community with vague comments. Do not you agree with me, dear Alberto? And the same thing I ask Alejandro Pisanty who participated in the meeting in Los Angeles and unfortunately, at the last minute, I can not participate in the PR; but I know that he is always aware of everything. Greetings to all, Sylvia _______________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein Leite sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org LACRALO-ALAC Delegate to NomComm 2014-2016 From: lac-discuss-es [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome by Alberto Soto Sent in: Sunday, May 20th, 2018 14: 54For: 'Alejandro Pisanty'Cc: 'LACRALO Espa� ol'Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Note from Contracte Party House (CPH) on At-Large Review As a candidate I answer now, totally in agreement with the comments and proposal of Alejandro. Best regards Alberto Soto. From: Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> Posted on: Sunday, May 20, 2018 01:32 pmFor: Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> CC: LACRALO Spanish <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Note from Contracte Party House (CPH) on At-Large Review Alberto, Thank you for sharing these two statements of opinion from relevant groups of ICANN.While it is possible to disagree with aspects of each of them, especially the sectarian view that has taken over the NCSG, and others that will surely come, it is also possible to note that the complacency and lack of self-criticism that give rise to the ALAC proposal are being paid at a fair price. This is not without its clear reflection in LACRALO, where the failure of the mediation process manifests itself in the repetition of the vices mentioned in the Review, in which the same old quarrels that gave rise to the conflict have been revived in non-public forums. place to mediation, and above all, to continue without focus on the development of policies, which was the number one agreement of mediation in February 2017.The only way forward is to review ALAC's responses with deep self-criticism, and not allow them to be transmitted officially in our representation until they are satisfactory; and in parallel, focus the expenditure of energy, time and other resources of LACRALO to the proposals sutantivas. The representatives and officials of LACRALO must notify ALAC that a proposal will be prepared and process what is necessary to build it before, during and after the ongoing electoral process, with the commitment of the new entrants to carry it out immediately. Alejandro Pisanty 2018-05-20 10:23 GMT-05: 00 Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> : Dear, in the note of NSCG, this note of the Contracted Party House is mentioned, whose terms are similar for the At-Large Review. It is an unofficial translation and the short link to see the original published in ICANNhttps://goo.gl/NQzaVC Best regards Alberto Soto May 7, 2018 FAO: Organizational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) of ICANN Board and Cherine Chalaby, Chairman of the ICANN Board Re: Statement of concern for At-Large Review Implementation Implementation Proposal Dear members of Cherine and the Committee: On behalf of the Contracted Party House (CPH) I would like to express our deep concern with the content and intent of the General Proposal for Implementation of the At-Large Review, which was published on April 20, 2018. This proposal follows the 2017 At-Large Review.During the public comment period CPH, among many other SO / AC, sent critical comments that were subsequently included in the recommendations in the final report of ITEMS International. These recommendations, together with the feasibility assessment of the At-Large review and recommendations, and the ICANN staff designed the implementation plan with direct questions for ALAC. The CPH considers that the aforementioned proposal does not address these issues, nor does it respond to the specific criticisms raised in the At-Large review report. In fact, all the recommendations have been rejected or modified.Furthermore, if the proposal is adopted by the OEC and the ICANN Board without the ALAC properly addressing the concerns of the wider ICANN community, this would set an alarming precedent for any future ICANN review. If critical opinions and recommendations, particularly those that are widely supported within the ICANN community, are perceived as ultimately ignorant, The ICANN reviews will lose credibility. The CPH believes that the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the ICANN Board should not consider the ALAC proposal until such time as ALAC provides a detailed response that addresses the criticisms raised by the At-Large review report, and the questions kindly gathered by the ICANN staff. This response must be submitted to the entire ICANN community, so that any additional input or discussion with the community can be arranged, to see the Review to an appropriate end. Yours sincerely, Graeme Bunton Chair RrSG _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing listlac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-eshttp://www.lacralo.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro PisantyFaculty of Chemistry UNAMAv. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD + 525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS + 525541444475Blog:http://pisanty.blogspot.comLinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisantyUnete to the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisantyUnete to the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http: // www. isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . to the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . http://twitter.com/apisanty----> > Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c120d57cc2.html --]]

1 0

LACRALO Monthly Call on Monday, 28 May 2018 at 23:00 UTC
by ICANN At-Large Staff May 21, 2018

May 21, 2018

If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<file:///composeviewinternalloadurl/staff@atlarge.icann.org> with your preferred number. Dear All, The next LACRALO Monthly Call is scheduled for Monday, 28 May 2018 at 23:00 UTC. Spanish, French and Portuguese interpretations will be provided. For other times: https://tinyurl.com/ycp54jek The agenda and call details can be found at: https://community.icann.org/x/ICEFBQ Wiki workspace: https://community.icann.org/x/NJQi<https://community.icann.org/x/NJQi%20> ADIGO Conference Bridge: English Conference ID = 1638 Spanish Conference ID = 1738 Portuguese Conference ID = 5393 French Conference ID = 1838 Toll-free access number (US and Canada): 800 550 6865 Other toll-free numbers: http://adigo.com/icann/[adigo.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__adigo.com_icann_&d=DwMG…> New Connection Information New Web conference tool: Webex 1. Click here [mytrials.webex.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mytrials.webex.com_myt…> to join the online event. Or copy and paste the following link to a browser: https://mytrials.webex.com/mytrials/onstage/g.php?MTID=e0e4a89eaa5624f1cdea… 2. Click "Join Now". Audio connection: To receive a call back, provide your phone number when you join the event, or call the number below and enter the access code. USA Toll: 1-240-454-0879 Global call-in numbers: https://mytrials.webex.com/mytrials/globalcallin.php?serviceType=EC&ED=6707… [mytrials.webex.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mytrials.webex.com_myt…> Access code: 922 749 685 Thank you. Kind Regards, ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<applewebdata://0E834633-16E8-43B3-A2E8-7E1203571239/staff@atlarge.icann.org> Website: atlarge.icann.org<applewebdata://0E834633-16E8-43B3-A2E8-7E1203571239/atlarge.icann.org> Facebook: facebook.com/icannatlarge<applewebdata://0E834633-16E8-43B3-A2E8-7E1203571239/facebook.com/icannatlar…> Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge<applewebdata://0E834633-16E8-43B3-A2E8-7E1203571239/@ICANNAtLarge> [cid:image001.png@01D3F100.60E10510]

1 0

Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] REMINDER / Meeting Invitation: ALAC Monthly Call on Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 12:00 UTC
by Carlos Raul Gutierrez May 21, 2018

May 21, 2018

To our LACRALO representatives in ALAC, I kindly request to our members in ALAC, to take the opportunity of this call and discuss the CPH letter of 7 May to the ICANN Chairman on the ALAC Implementation Overview Proposal, Approved by the ALAC, 20 April 2018 (both attached for your convenience). Under any circumstance (not only present budgetary constrains) this letter from a GNSO constituency as very relevant to our past and future work, and we should be have all elements for a serious discussion on our next LACRALO call on 28 May. Happy week to all Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez ISOC Costa Rica Chapter skype carlos.raulg +506 8837 7176 ________ Apartado 1571-1000 COSTA RICA ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Date: Mon, May 21, 2018 at 4:31 AM Subject: [ALAC-Announce] REMINDER / Meeting Invitation: ALAC Monthly Call on Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 12:00 UTC To: ALAC Announce <alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org with your preferred number. Also find attached, WebEx instructions. Dear All, The May *ALAC Monthly Call* is scheduled for *Tuesday, 22 May 2018 from 12:00 – 14:00 UTC*. For other times: https://tinyurl.com/y83uvmen The agenda (to be updated) and call details are available at: https://community.icann.org/x/OxoFBQ *New Connection Information* *New Web Conference Tool: Webex* *Please join the meeting room here:* 1. Click here [mytrials.webex.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mytrials.webex.com_myt…> to join the online event. Or copy and paste the following link to a browser: https://mytrials.webex.com/mytrials/onstage/g.php?MTID=e6c65 cd92f8fb4373cc622b7f19d98c46 2. Click "Join Now". *Audio Connection:* To receive a call back, provide your phone number when you join the event, or call the number below and enter the access code. USA Toll: 1-240-454-0879 Global call-in numbers: https://mytrials.webex.com/mytrials/globalcallin. php?serviceType=EC&ED=669706602&tollFree=0 Access code: 926 423 814 *Conference ID’s:* English: 1638 Spanish: 1738 French: 1838 Russian: 2138 Dial-in numbers: *http://adigo.com/icann/ * <http://adigo.com/icann/> *If you are unable to attend the call please send an email indicating your absence and we will note this information on the agenda.* If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at: *staff(a)atlarge.icann.org* Thank you. Kind Regards, ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Website: atlarge.icann.org Facebook: facebook.com/icannatlarge Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge _______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large
by DIEGO ALFONSO ACOSTA BASTIDAS May 21, 2018

May 21, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject:Re: Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large Desde:DIEGO ALFONSO ACOSTA BASTIDAS <dacostabastidas(a)dtech.ec> Dear Alejandro Agree and +1 for a thorough analysis and evaluation. Atte Diego Acosta Bastidas On May 20, 2018, 11:32, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: Alberto, Thank you for sharing these two statements of opinion from relevant groups of ICANN.While it is possible to disagree with aspects of each of them, especially the sectarian view that has taken over the NCSG, and others that will surely come, it is also possible to note that the complacency and lack of self-criticism that give rise to the ALAC proposal are being paid at a fair price. This is not without its clear reflection in LACRALO, where the failure of the mediation process manifests itself in the repetition of the vices mentioned in the Review, in which the same old quarrels that gave rise to the conflict have been revived in non-public forums. place to mediation, and above all, to continue without focus on the development of policies, which was the number one agreement of mediation in February 2017.The only way forward is to review ALAC's responses with deep self-criticism, and not allow them to be transmitted officially in our representation until they are satisfactory; and in parallel, focus the expenditure of energy, time and other resources of LACRALO to the proposals sutantivas. The representatives and officials of LACRALO must notify ALAC that a proposal will be prepared and process what is necessary to build it before, during and after the ongoing electoral process, with the commitment of the new entrants to carry it out immediately. Alejandro Pisanty 2018-05-20 10:23 GMT-05: 00 Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> : Dear, in the note of NSCG, this note of the Contracted Party House is mentioned, whose terms are similar for the At-Large Review. It is an unofficial translation and the short link to see the original published in ICANNhttps://goo.gl/NQzaVC Best regards Alberto Soto May 7, 2018 FAO: Organizational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) of ICANN Board and Cherine Chalaby, Chairman of the ICANN Board Re: Statement of concern for At-Large Review Implementation Implementation Proposal Dear members of Cherine and the Committee: On behalf of the Contracted Party House (CPH) I would like to express our deep concern with the content and intent of the General Proposal for Implementation of the At-Large Review, which was published on April 20, 2018. This proposal follows the 2017 At-Large Review.During the public comment period CPH, among many other SO / AC, sent critical comments that were subsequently included in the recommendations in the final report of ITEMS International. These recommendations, together with the feasibility assessment of the At-Large review and recommendations, and the ICANN staff designed the implementation plan with direct questions for ALAC. The CPH considers that the aforementioned proposal does not address these issues, nor does it respond to the specific criticisms raised in the At-Large review report. In fact, all the recommendations have been rejected or modified.Furthermore, if the proposal is adopted by the OEC and the ICANN Board without the ALAC properly addressing the concerns of the wider ICANN community, this would set an alarming precedent for any future ICANN review. If critical opinions and recommendations, particularly those that are widely supported within the ICANN community, are perceived as ultimately ignorant, The ICANN reviews will lose credibility. The CPH believes that the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the ICANN Board should not consider the ALAC proposal until such time as ALAC provides a detailed response that addresses the criticisms raised by the At-Large review report, and the questions kindly gathered by the ICANN staff. This response must be submitted to the entire ICANN community, so that any additional input or discussion with the community can be arranged, to see the Review to an appropriate end. Yours sincerely, Graeme Bunton Chair RrSG _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org http://www.lacralo.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM Av.Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog:http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http: // www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http ://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d6cf5617f0.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large
by carlos dionisio aguirre May 20, 2018

May 20, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject:Re: Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large Desde:carlos dionisio aguirre <carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com> I agree with Carlos Raul Carlos Dionisio Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message -------- From: Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> Date: 5/20/18 7:50 PM (GMT-03: 00) To: Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul(a)gutierrez.se> Cc: LACRALO <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Note from Contracte Party House (CPH) on At-Large Review In response to a question from one of the readers of this list, I want to clarify that I am 100% in agreement with the following proposal by Alejandor Pisanty "The only way forward is to review ALAC's answers with deep self-criticism, and not let them be officially transmitted in our representation until they are satisfactory, and in parallel, to focus the expenditure of energy, time and other resources of LACRALO to the sutantivas proposals.The representatives and officials of LACRALO must notify the ALAC that a proposal will be prepared and processed as necessary to build it before, during and after the ongoing electoral process, with the commitment of the new entrants to carry it out immediately. " Person for my lack of clarity. As for the progress of the mediation process, I have written a separate note for Alejandro, updating him on the process and I await his comments. I hope my comments are understood in this spirit Happy week Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez ISOC Costa Rica Chapter skype carlos.raulg +506 8837 7176 ________ Section 1571-1000 COSTA RICA 2018-05-20 11:18 GMT-06: 00 Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul(a)gutierrez.se> : Thanks Alejandro 100% according to your comments On May 20, 2018 10:32:18 AM CST, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: Alberto, Thank you for sharing these two statements of opinion from relevant groups of ICANN.While it is possible to disagree with aspects of each of them, especially the sectarian view that has taken over the NCSG, and others that will surely come, it is also possible to note that the complacency and lack of self-criticism that give rise to the ALAC proposal are being paid at a fair price. This is not without its clear reflection in LACRALO, where the failure of the mediation process manifests itself in the repetition of the vices mentioned in the Review, in which the same old quarrels that gave rise to the conflict have been revived in non-public forums. place to mediation, and above all, to continue without focus on the development of policies, which was the number one agreement of mediation in February 2017.The only way forward is to review ALAC's responses with deep self-criticism, and not allow them to be transmitted officially in our representation until they are satisfactory; and in parallel, focus the expenditure of energy, time and other resources of LACRALO to the proposals sutantivas. The representatives and officials of LACRALO must notify ALAC that a proposal will be prepared and process what is necessary to build it before, during and after the ongoing electoral process, with the commitment of the new entrants to carry it out immediately. Alejandro Pisanty 2018-05-20 10:23 GMT-05: 00 Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> : Dear, in the note of NSCG, this note of the Contracted Party House is mentioned, whose terms are similar for the At-Large Review. It is an unofficial translation and the short link to see the original published in ICANN https://goo.gl/NQzaVC Best regards Alberto Soto May 7, 2018 FAO: Organizational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) of ICANN Board and Cherine Chalaby, Chairman of the ICANN Board Re: Statement of concern for At-Large Review Implementation Implementation Proposal Dear members of Cherine and the Committee: On behalf of the Contracted Party House (CPH) I would like to express our deep concern with the content and intent of the General Proposal for Implementation of the At-Large Review, which was published on April 20, 2018. This proposal follows the 2017 At-Large Review. During the public comment period CPH, among many other SO / AC, sent critical comments that were subsequently included in the recommendations in the final report of ITEMS International. These recommendations, together with the feasibility assessment of the At-Large review and recommendations, and the ICANN staff designed the implementation plan with direct questions for ALAC. The CPH considers that the aforementioned proposal does not address these issues, nor does it respond to the specific criticisms raised in the At-Large review report.In fact, all the recommendations have been rejected or modified. Furthermore, if the proposal is adopted by the OEC and the ICANN Board without the ALAC properly addressing the concerns of the wider ICANN community, this would set an alarming precedent for any future ICANN review. If critical opinions and recommendations, particularly those that are widely supported within the ICANN community, are perceived as ultimately ignorant, The ICANN reviews will lose credibility. The CPH believes that the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the ICANN Board should not consider the ALAC proposal until such time as ALAC provides a detailed response that addresses the criticisms raised by the At-Large review report, and the questions kindly gathered by the ICANN staff. This response must be submitted to the entire ICANN community, so that any additional input or discussion with the community can be arranged, to see the Review to an appropriate end. Yours sincerely, Graeme Bunton Chair RrSG _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM Av.Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog:http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http: // www.isoc.org . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http ://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f075e6d9b4.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large
by Carlos Raul Gutierrez May 20, 2018

May 20, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject:Re: Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large Desde:Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> In response to a question from one of the readers of this list, I want to clarify that I am 100% in agreement with the following proposal by Alejandor Pisanty "The only way forward is to review ALAC's answers with deep self-criticism, and not let them be officially transmitted in our representation until they are satisfactory, and in parallel, to focus the expenditure of energy, time and other resources of LACRALO to the sutantivas proposals.The representatives and officials of LACRALO must notify the ALAC that a proposal will be prepared and processed as necessary to build it before, during and after the ongoing electoral process, with the commitment of the new entrants to carry it out immediately. " Person for my lack of clarity. As regards the progress of the hemediated mediation process, a separate note is sent to Alejandro adding it to the process and I await your comments. I hope my comments are understood within this spirit Happy week Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez ISOC Costa Rica Chapter skype carlos.raulg +506 8837 7176 ________ Section 1571-1000 COSTA RICA 2018-05-20 11:18 GMT-06: 00 Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul(a)gutierrez.se> : Thanks Alejandro 100% according to your comments On May 20, 2018 10:32:18 AM CST, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: Alberto, Thank you for sharing these two statements of opinion from relevant groups of ICANN.While it is possible to disagree with aspects of each of them, especially the sectarian view that has taken over the NCSG, and others that will surely come, it is also possible to note that the complacency and lack of self-criticism that give rise to the ALAC proposal are being paid at a fair price. This is not without its clear reflection in LACRALO, where the failure of the mediation process manifests itself in the repetition of the vices mentioned in the Review, in which the same old quarrels that gave rise to the conflict have been revived in non-public forums. place to mediation, and above all, to continue without focus on the development of policies, which was the number one agreement of mediation in February 2017.The only way forward is to review ALAC's responses with deep self-criticism, and not allow them to be transmitted officially in our representation until they are satisfactory; and in parallel, focus the expenditure of energy, time and other resources of LACRALO to the proposals sutantivas. The representatives and officials of LACRALO must notify ALAC that a proposal will be prepared and process what is necessary to build it before, during and after the ongoing electoral process, with the commitment of the new entrants to carry it out immediately. Alejandro Pisanty 2018-05-20 10:23 GMT-05: 00 Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> : Dear, in the note of NSCG, this note of the Contracted Party House is mentioned, whose terms are similar for the At-Large Review. It is an unofficial translation and the short link to see the original published in ICANNhttps://goo.gl/NQzaVC Best regards Alberto Soto May 7, 2018 FAO: Organizational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) of ICANN Board and Cherine Chalaby, Chairman of the ICANN Board Re: Statement of concern for At-Large Review Implementation Implementation Proposal Dear members of Cherine and the Committee: On behalf of the Contracted Party House (CPH) I would like to express our deep concern with the content and intent of the General Proposal for Implementation of the At-Large Review, which was published on April 20, 2018. This proposal follows the 2017 At-Large Review.During the public comment period CPH, among many other SO / AC, sent critical comments that were subsequently included in the recommendations in the final report of ITEMS International. These recommendations, together with the feasibility assessment of the At-Large review and recommendations, and the ICANN staff designed the implementation plan with direct questions for ALAC. The CPH considers that the aforementioned proposal does not address these issues, nor does it respond to the specific criticisms raised in the At-Large review report. In fact, all the recommendations have been rejected or modified.Furthermore, if the proposal is adopted by the OEC and the ICANN Board without the ALAC properly addressing the concerns of the wider ICANN community, this would set an alarming precedent for any future ICANN review. If critical opinions and recommendations, particularly those that are widely supported within the ICANN community, are perceived as ultimately ignorant, The ICANN reviews will lose credibility. The CPH believes that the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the ICANN Board should not consider the ALAC proposal until such time as ALAC provides a detailed response that addresses the criticisms raised by the At-Large review report, and the questions kindly gathered by the ICANN staff. This response must be submitted to the entire ICANN community, so that any additional input or discussion with the community can be arranged, to see the Review to an appropriate end. Yours sincerely, Graeme Bunton Chair RrSG _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM Av.Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog:http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http: // www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http ://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/8d0df75160.html --]]

1 0

CANCELLED - LACRALO Monthly Call on Monday, 21 May 2018 at 23:00 UTC
by ICANN At-Large Staff May 20, 2018

May 20, 2018

Dear All, Due to the unavailability of many of the speakers, the LACRALO Monthly call on Monday 21 May at 23:00 UTC is CANCELLED. We will confirm the new date very shortly - please hold Monday 28 May at 23:00 UTC. Thank you and apologies for the short notice. Kind regards, At-Large Staff ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> [known.png] From: At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 15 May 2018 at 16:04 To: "lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>, Rodrigo de la Parra <rodrigo.delaparra(a)icann.org>, Albert Daniels <albert.daniels(a)icann.org>, Daniel Fink <daniel.fink(a)icann.org>, Rodrigo Saucedo <rodrigo.saucedo(a)icann.org> Cc: At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Subject: Meeting Invitation: LACRALO Monthly Call on Monday, 21 May 2018 at 23:00 UTC If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<file:///composeviewinternalloadurl/staff@atlarge.icann.org> with your preferred number. Also find attached, Webex instructions. Dear All, The next LACRALO Monthly Call is scheduled for Monday, 21 May 2018 at 23:00 UTC. Spanish, French and Portuguese interpretations will be provided. For other times: https://tinyurl.com/y7nfwvj4 The agenda and call details can be found at: https://community.icann.org/x/SAsFBQ Wiki workspace: https://community.icann.org/x/NJQi<https://community.icann.org/x/NJQi%20> ADIGO Conference Bridge: English Conference ID = 1638 Spanish Conference ID = 1738 Portuguese Conference ID = 5393 French Conference ID = 1838 Toll-free access number (US and Canada): 800 550 6865 Other toll-free numbers: http://adigo.com/icann/[adigo.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__adigo.com_icann_&d=DwMG…> New Connection Information New Web conference tool: Webex 1. Click here [mytrials.webex.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mytrials.webex.com_myt…> to join the online event. Or copy and paste the following link to a browser: https://mytrials.webex.com/mytrials/onstage/g.php?MTID=e0e4a89eaa5624f1cdea… 2. Click "Join Now". Audio connection: To receive a call back, provide your phone number when you join the event, or call the number below and enter the access code. USA Toll: 1-240-454-0879 Global call-in numbers: https://mytrials.webex.com/mytrials/globalcallin.php?serviceType=EC&ED=6707… [mytrials.webex.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mytrials.webex.com_myt…> Access code: 922 749 685 Thank you. Kind Regards, ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<applewebdata://0E834633-16E8-43B3-A2E8-7E1203571239/staff@atlarge.icann.org> Website: atlarge.icann.org<applewebdata://0E834633-16E8-43B3-A2E8-7E1203571239/atlarge.icann.org> Facebook: facebook.com/icannatlarge<applewebdata://0E834633-16E8-43B3-A2E8-7E1203571239/facebook.com/icannatlar…> Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge<applewebdata://0E834633-16E8-43B3-A2E8-7E1203571239/@ICANNAtLarge> [cid:image002.png@01D3F082.FBE43C90]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large
by Carlos Raul Gutierrez May 20, 2018

May 20, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject:Re: Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large Desde:Carlos Raul Gutierrez <carlosraul(a)gutierrez.se> Thanks Alejandro 100% according to your comments On May 20, 2018 10:32:18 AM CST, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: Alberto, Thank you for sharing these two statements of opinion from relevant groups of ICANN.While it is possible to disagree with aspects of each of them, especially the sectarian view that has taken over the NCSG, and others that will surely come, it is also possible to note that the complacency and lack of self-criticism that give rise to the ALAC proposal are being paid at a fair price. This is not without its clear reflection in LACRALO, where the failure of the mediation process manifests itself in the repetition of the vices mentioned in the Review, in which the same old quarrels that gave rise to the conflict have been revived in non-public forums. place to mediation, and above all, to continue without focus on the development of policies, which was the number one agreement of mediation in February 2017.The only way forward is to review ALAC's responses with deep self-criticism, and not allow them to be transmitted officially in our representation until they are satisfactory; and in parallel, focus the expenditure of energy, time and other resources of LACRALO to the proposals sutantivas. The representatives and officials of LACRALO must notify ALAC that a proposal will be prepared and process what is necessary to build it before, during and after the ongoing electoral process, with the commitment of the new entrants to carry it out immediately. Alejandro Pisanty 2018-05-20 10:23 GMT-05: 00 Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> : Dear, in the note of NSCG, this note of the Contracted Party House is mentioned, whose terms are similar for the At-Large Review. It is an unofficial translation and the short link to see the original published in ICANNhttps://goo.gl/NQzaVC Best regards Alberto Soto May 7, 2018 FAO: Organizational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) of ICANN Board and Cherine Chalaby, Chairman of the ICANN Board Re: Statement of concern for At-Large Review Implementation Implementation Proposal Dear members of Cherine and the Committee: On behalf of the Contracted Party House (CPH) I would like to express our deep concern with the content and intent of the General Proposal for Implementation of the At-Large Review, which was published on April 20, 2018. This proposal follows the 2017 At-Large Review.During the public comment period CPH, among many other SO / AC, sent critical comments that were subsequently included in the recommendations in the final report of ITEMS International. These recommendations, together with the feasibility assessment of the At-Large review and recommendations, and the ICANN staff designed the implementation plan with direct questions for ALAC. The CPH considers that the aforementioned proposal does not address these issues, nor does it respond to the specific criticisms raised in the At-Large review report. In fact, all the recommendations have been rejected or modified.Furthermore, if the proposal is adopted by the OEC and the ICANN Board without the ALAC properly addressing the concerns of the wider ICANN community, this would set an alarming precedent for any future ICANN review. If critical opinions and recommendations, particularly those that are widely supported within the ICANN community, are perceived as ultimately ignorant, The ICANN reviews will lose credibility. The CPH believes that the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the ICANN Board should not consider the ALAC proposal until such time as ALAC provides a detailed response that addresses the criticisms raised by the At-Large review report, and the questions kindly gathered by the ICANN staff. This response must be submitted to the entire ICANN community, so that any additional input or discussion with the community can be arranged, to see the Review to an appropriate end. Yours sincerely, Graeme Bunton Chair RrSG _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM Av.Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog:http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http: // www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http ://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b3949b6418.html --]]

1 0