lac-discuss-en

Download

lac-discuss-en@icann.org

January 2019

25 participants
42 discussions

LACRALO Groups - GNSO ISSUES
by Vanda Scartezini Jan. 3, 2019

Jan. 3, 2019

Dear friends Estimados amigos Hope your holidays have been wonderful and 2019 will bring you just good news! Here the first good news: GNSO issues are quite interesting once you decide to follow its discussion. To give you a quick update on how things are going on in such CCWG here the January 2019 Newsletter , If you want to join this discussion, the idea of our group is to have a specific email list to discuss and clarify all aspects of GNSO CCWG to facilitate your participation directly on those groups. There are several links to allow full understanding of all issues. If you have interest, please write to Silvia Vivanco, asking to add your email to this group. Kisses to all Espero que las Fiestas han sido excelentes para ustedes y sus familias. ¡Espero que 2019 les brinde solo con buenas nuevas! Aquí empezamos con la primera buena nueva: Los tópicos de GNSO son muy interesantes una vez que uno decida seguir las discusiones. Para que tengan una actualización y saber como están las discusiones en los CCWG en GNSO les comparto la Newsletter de enero de 2019. Si le gustaría participar de esta discusión, la idea de esto grupo es justamente tener un espacio para aclarar dudas y discutir ideas sobre esto tema , para facilitar la participación directa de ustedes en estos grupos. En el texto hy links para detalles que permiten la totalidad de los asuntos mencionados. Si hay interese escriban a Silvia Vivanco para que adicione su email al grupo. Abrazos a todos Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. The latest edition is now available. [http://r20.rs6.net/on.jsp?ca=1e4ea7b8-85aa-4fb1-abe6-27ea932b9dc0&a=1122025…] [http://files.constantcontact.com/304b3fd3501/56a69255-40e1-45ae-92f9-4e332f…] New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP January 2019 Newsletter [http://files.constantcontact.com/304b3fd3501/726c6e6b-5715-42e1-b786-558930…] CURRENT STATUS Full Working Group and Sub Groups A, B, and C [http://files.constantcontact.com/304b3fd3501/285d47cc-8b52-4836-bf8f-d672e6…] Three Sub Groups continue to meet on a regular basis to review public comments<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> received on the Working Group’s Initial Report<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…>. The full Working Group continues to meet regularly to address issues that the Sub Groups have referred to the full Working Group for additional consideration. Following an extension, the public comment<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> period on the Working Group’s supplemental Initial Report<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> closed on 21 December. The supplemental Initial Report covers topics that were not included in the Initial Report and that the Working Group determined required additional consideration. The full Working Group held one regular meeting in December: 18 December<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…>: · Went over the status of Sub Groups A, B, and C and Work Track 5 · Continued to discuss topics<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> raised in public comment that the Sub Groups referred to the full Working Group for additional consideration and recommendations contained in the Competition, Consumer Trust, and Consumer Choice Review Team Final Report targeting the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process Working Group Sub Groups held the following meetings to make progress on the Working Group’s review of public comments on the Initial Report: Sub Group A · 6 December<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…>: Review of comments on Predictability<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> and Clarity of the Application Process<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> · 13 December<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…>: Review of comments on Clarity of the Application Process<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> and Applications Assessed in Rounds<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> · 20 December<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…>: Review of comments on Applications Assessed in Rounds<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> Sub Group B · 4 December<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…>: Review of comments on Application Fees<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> and Variable Fees<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> · 11 December<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…>: Review of comments on Variable Fees<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> and Application Submission Period<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> · 18 December<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…>: Review of comments on Application Submission Period<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> and Terms and Conditions<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> Sub Group C · 6 December<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…>: Review of comments on Objections<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> · 13 December<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…>: Review of comments on Objections<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> · 20 December<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…>: Review of comments on Objections<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> A summary of meetings held in January will be covered in the next edition of the newsletter. Work Track 5 The public comment period<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> for the Work Track 5 supplemental Initial Report<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> remains open until 22 January. This report focuses exclusively on the issue of geographic names at the top level. Work Track 5 did not hold meetings in December in order to encourage members to focus on drafting comments on the Initial Report. [https://files.constantcontact.com/304b3fd3501/94e4d20f-a89e-4b9e-9bbf-4bd43…] NEXT STEPS Full Working Group and Sub Groups A, B, and C The full Working Group has meetings scheduled for 7 January and 22 January to continue its discussion of items referred from the Sub Groups. Each of the Sub Groups will continue to meet weekly in January. With the closure of the public comment period for the supplemental Initial Report, staff will produce a Report of Public Comments summarizing the input received. Work Track 5 [http://files.constantcontact.com/304b3fd3501/f5d91b22-0790-447a-89df-3f5d38…] The Work Track 5 Co-Leaders will hold a webinar for the community on Wednesday 9 January at 20:00 UTC for 60 minutes. The purpose of the webinar is to provide an overview of the Work Track 5 supplemental Initial Report and answer questions from community members about the report. The webinar will not include debate on substantive issues contained in the report. All are welcome to attend the webinar. If you would like to participate, please register here<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…>. [https://files.constantcontact.com/304b3fd3501/e36580aa-b435-4cc6-a1ad-2d691…] WHAT IS THIS ABOUT? In June 2014, the GNSO Council established a Discussion Group that was intended to evaluate the experiences of the 2012 round gTLD Program and to identify possible areas for future GNSO policy development. The Discussion Group’s deliverables<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> served as the basis for the GNSO Council request for a Preliminary Issue Report in June of 2015. Following the publication of the Final Issue Report<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…>, the GNSO Council adopted the charter<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> for the PDP Working Group, which began its work in February 2016. The Working Group initially concentrated on a set of overarching issues. It later conducted deliberations on additional topics in its charter using five separate Work Tracks: Work Track 1 - Overall Process/Support/Outreach, Work Track 2 - Legal/Regulatory, Work Track 3: String Contention/Objections & Disputes, Work Track 4: Internationalized Domain Names/Technical & Operations, Work Track 5: Geographic Names at the Top Level. [https://files.constantcontact.com/304b3fd3501/12e11e07-1f0d-47cb-9551-d35e6…] WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT? The Discussion Group identified a number of subjects that may require further analysis and possible formulation of policy language. There are existing policy recommendations adopted by the GNSO Council and ICANN Board, which will remain in place unless the PDP WG determines that changes are needed. [http://files.constantcontact.com/304b3fd3501/a9423591-3ad3-4efd-a50e-476258…] More Information · Workspace Wiki<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> · Charter<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> · Active Project Page<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> · GNSO Website<http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> To join this effort, please email the GNSO Secretariat: gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>. All are welcome! Follow the GNSO on Twitter [Twitter]‌ <http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001iTaPb599Oe2dF3krMDKHNeTpTiwrYsb2nJ3A_9LS_5Po…> ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300, Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Unsubscribe vanda(a)scartezini.org<https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=un&m=00115LrDzKl3LoTB9FWCDiE2A%3D&…> Update Profile<https://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=oo&m=00115LrDzKl3LoTB9FWCDiE2A%3D&…> | About our service provider<http://www.constantcontact.com/legal/service-provider?cc=about-service-prov…> Sent by emily.barabas(a)icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org> in collaboration with [Trusted Email from Constant Contact - Try it FREE today.]<http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=nge> Try it free today<http://www.constantcontact.com/index.jsp?cc=nge>

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Sobre cooperación con LACNIC
by Alfredo Lopez Jan. 1, 2019

Jan. 1, 2019

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject:Re: Sobre cooperación con LACNIC Desde:Alfredo Lopez <alfredolopezh(a)gmail.com> Equally agree and a prosperous 2019 for all Mon., Dec. 31 2018 at 13:31, Aida Noblia ( <aidanoblia(a)gmail.com> ) wrote: In agreement. HAPPY 2019 !!! Mon., Dec. 31 2018 2:16 PM, Alberto Soto <alberto(a)soto.net.ar> wrote: Sorry, I forgot something important. Not all RIRs give Ralos all the benefits they are able to give.In our small WG completed with a member of each Ralo (Harold Arcos of our Region), we will also analyze this, and everything will be treated if ALAC approves this project of meeting in Kobe. Regards!!! Alberto Soto Sent from my iPhone On December 31 2018, at (s) 14:03, Alberto Soto <alberto(a)soto.net.ar> wrote: Dear, thank you for the salutations and I reward you with my best wishes: enjoy with your family !! Regarding my request. It is something that I have also plan to radio in LACRALO and now I plan it for all Regions as Co-chair of the Organizacinal Area of ALAC. It is the relation to our respective RIRs. For this we must think that we can give to them. Alejandro is right, Aida too. But what is requested is to have an F2F meeting between the RIRs and ALAC, but with the proposed policies generated in our ALSs, since they must be the executing arm. Two concrete examples with short words: collaboration in the diffusion of the change IPv4 to IPv6; dissemination for the implementation of DNSSEC. Both important things for end users. But we can not generate a working group and have results in a year.The Kobe meeting is in March, and I have to have finished everything in the first half of February so that the meeting is approved and finally entered into the calendar. I await your collaborations. A big hug for all and many congratulations! Alberto Soto Sent from my iPhone On December 31 2018, at 11:39, Aida Noblia <aidanoblia(a)gmail.com> wrote: My proposal was concrete. It was about making each event an event in its place to disseminate the issues and issues related to Lacnic. Someone proposed that they be made all on the same day for greater impact in the region.Alberto clarified that the objective would be to study the problems of Lacnic and suggest solutions. Although they are different activities I understand that one or both types of meetings can be planned, which are not exclusive but could be complementary. The form could be more or less similar, that is to say, face-to-face and / or distance in both cases. Firstly, there should be more internal meetings to discuss the issues and problems, a summary or summary of these and if possible and there were proposals and ways to solve them, for which someone also stated that they have several ideas, without specifying them.This could be specified in the meetings that are being held, without prejudice to mentioning them on the list or as best understood to coordinate the firs t initial meeting as a way to start the process. Mon., Dec. 31 2018 10:12, Ing. Carlos Antonio Leal Saballos <lealsaballos(a)gmail.com> wrote: Good Morning A clarification only, it is true I mentioned to the university and not to the ALS. It turns out that for me there is a thin line between the two since the ALS is formed by members of IEEE (students and professionals) of the university. I can not guarantee spaces for video conferences or workshops without the help of the university. It is also easier to attract people from all sectors making calls from the university. Finally I am convinced that it is necessary to do it in a systematic way (creating specific routes to obtain concrete results in the long term). I would like us to focus our efforts to achieve a good understanding of important and necessary issues such as IPv6, Big Data, security, among others. But the main thing is to organize a governance school here in Central America. Those that have organized are far away and in very nice places but very expensive. I am attentive to your comments and I am at your service for whatever you need. Many greetings On December 31 2018 12:03 am, "Alejandro Pisanty" <apisanty(a)gmail.com> wrote: Colleagues, There are many ideas, but what Alberto asks of us is something concrete and executable, and more, that deserves attention from LACNIC. This in turn must call to understand its function and complement it, because LACNIC is a highly self-sufficient organization. In order to act effectively, it is essential that the organizations that decide to cooperate in this project with Alberto appoint a representative or delegate who knows the problems of LACNIC. With this we will avoid continuing to embroider in the air. We have talked a lot about this cooperation for many years. To turn it into concrete acts, the first thing is to focus on those who can make concrete proposals (such as those that can be derived from what Carlos Antonio said, but note that he does it from his university, not from his ALS). Alejandro Pisanty On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 9:10 PM Eng. Carlos Antonio Leal Saballos <lealsaballos(a)gmail.com> wrote: Hello Alberto Carlos Leal greets you from Nicaragua. Happy Christmas and a 2019 full of blessings for all. I consider it very important to approach LACNIC on important issues such as IPv6, we know nothing or very little in our country. I'm a university professor and I coordinate a career in telecommunications engineering It will be a pleasure to support. Ideas we have many. regards Wed., Dec. 26 from 2018 10:06 am, Alberto Soto <alberto(a)soto.net.ar> wrote: Dear, first of all, I hope you have celebrated a beautiful Christmas with your loved ones. As always we have to do something for the benefit of our Region, I would like to ask you for ideas on how our ALSs can collaborate with our RIR, LACNIC. In Kobe there will be a specific reign with the RIRs and we want ideas from all regions to see how we can collaborate, in addition to achieving training and other benefits that each of them can offer. That meeting is very important, and I need to have information before January 15th. Please, think a little and answer my mail, or the list if you wish. Best regards and have an excellent 2019 !!!! Alberto Soto +54 911 6212 5559 _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org http://www.lacralo.org _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty School of Chemistry UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog:http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http: // www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Join the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http ://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org http://www.lacralo.org _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org http://www.lacralo.org _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org - Regards, Alfredo López Hernández @alopezhb [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/38d99633cb.html --]]

1 0