November 2012 - lac-discuss-en

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Utf-8? Q? Fwd = 3A_Declaraci = C3 = B3n_sobre_la_Estra? == Utf-8? Q? Tegia_Reuni = C3 = B3n_de_ICANN? =
by vanda＠uol.com.br Nov. 16, 2012

Nov. 16, 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =? Utf-8? Q? Fwd = 3A_Declaraci = C3 = B3n_sobre_la_Estra? == Utf-8? Q? Tegia_Reuni = C3 = B3n_de_ICANN? = From: vanda(a)uol.com.br Although understands that ICANN's proposal is what reality is demonstrating, I think Fatima and Natalia document represents the will of our region, so has my support com. Hugs For those who have not had the opportunity to visit the new ICANN facilities here in Los Angeles, is interesting mainly because it allows emplegados estean all on one floor open com much interaction among all. There vidros throughout permitindo one part very nice view of the skyline. But more interesting is the change in the spirit of all. There is much joy in the staff, much focus and willingness to work that way not long ago. Hugs to all Vanda Scartezini Sent from my iPad On 16/11/2012, at 5:47, Vanessa Copetti Cravo <VanessaC(a)anatel.gov.br> wrote: > ¡Hola! > No sé si puedo opinar, ya que no soy todavía miembro de cualquier organización que integra LACRALO. De cualquier manera, debo mencionar que he estado siguiendo el debate sobre esta lista desde Toronto y me parece muy apropriada la declaración elaborada por Natalia y Fátima, porque comparto la opinión de que la estrategia propuesta dificulta la participación de los interesados en nuestra región (asi como en Africa), lo que dificulta la concienciación con respecto a los temas tratados por la ICANN, aunque reconoce las dificultades operativas de la realización de las reuniones. > > Saludos, > Vanessa Cravo > Brasil > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > [mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de Fatima Cambronero Enviado el: jueves, 15 de noviembre de 2012 12:30 p.m. > Para: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > CC: LACRALO discussion list > Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Fwd: Declaración sobre la Estrategia Reunión de ICANN > > Estimados, > > > Respecto de la Propuesta de Estrategia de Consolidación de Reuniones de ICANN que se encuentra abierta a comentario público hasta el día de mañana > (16 de Noviembre a las 23.59 UTC), con Natalia Enciso hemos elaborado la siguiente Declaración (está copiada debajo) que queremos someter a su consideración. > > > En esta declaración hemos tenido en cuenta los diferentes comentarios que han realizado algunos miembros de LACRALO en nuestra lista y además la declaración elaborada por Tijani de AFRALO. > > > Hemos conversado con nuestro Presidente de LACRALO, José Arce, y como nos queda poco tiempo, les solicitamos amablemente que por favor, revisen esta declaración y realicen sus comentarios durante todo el día de hoy, así nos queda tiempo el día de mañana para poder pasarlo al inglés e incluirlo como comentario público a nombre de LACRALO. > > > También debido a la brevedad del tiempo, les queremos solicitar que por favor si no están de acuerdo con alguna parte del texto, propongan la redacción del texto que prefieren en su lugar, ya que los comentarios generales van a demorar para poder ser elaborados e incluidos. > > > Muchas gracias. > > > Saludos cordiales, > > Fatima Cambronero > > > *Declaración de LACRALO sobre la Propuesta de Estrat [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ba609c4193.html --]]

1 0

=? Iso-8859-1? Q? RES = 3A__Fwd = 3A_Declaraci = F3n_sobr? == Iso-8859-1? Q? E_la_Estrategia_Reuni = F3n_de_ICANN? =
by VanessaC＠anatel.gov.br Nov. 16, 2012

Nov. 16, 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? RES = 3A__Fwd = 3A_Declaraci = F3n_sobr? == Iso-8859-1? Q? E_la_Estrategia_Reuni = F3n_de_ICANN? = From: VanessaC(a)anatel.gov.br JosArce, Thank you very much! I hope to contribute to the discussions. Vanessa From: JosFrancisco Arce [mailto: josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com] Submitted in: sixth-feira, 16 novembre 2012 12:17 To: Vanessa Copetti Cravo Cc: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: Declaration on ICANN Reunin Strategy Dear Vanessa, My name is and I am the Chair JosArce LACRALO. Quera let you know that there is no problem and opines that get involved in themed. We are grateful for your interest, so free sintete comment. No need to be an accredited association to comment and participate. Only prevents you vote and make decisions. I remain at your disposal to whatever you need. JosArce. - LACRALO Chair _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3fdafa1e06.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Fwd = 3A_Declaraci = F3n_sobre_la_Est? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Rategia_Reuni = F3n_de_ICANN? =
by josefranciscoarce＠gmail.com Nov. 16, 2012

Nov. 16, 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Fwd = 3A_Declaraci = F3n_sobre_la_Est? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Rategia_Reuni = F3n_de_ICANN? = From: josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com Dear Vanessa, My name is and I am the Chair JosArce LACRALO. Quera let you know that no opines's problem and to get involved in themed. We grateful for your interest, so free sintete comment. No need to be an accredited association for review and participate. Only prevents you vote and make decisions. I remain at your disposal to whatever you need. JosArce. - LACRALO Chair The 16 November 2012 10:47, Vanessa Copetti Cravo < VanessaC(a)anatel.gov.br> wrote: > ¡Hola! > No sé si puedo opinar, ya que no soy todavía miembro de cualquier > organización que integra LACRALO. De cualquier manera, debo mencionar que > he estado siguiendo el debate sobre esta lista desde Toronto y me parece > muy apropriada la declaración elaborada por Natalia y Fátima, porque > comparto la opinión de que la estrategia propuesta dificulta la > participación de los interesados en nuestra región (asi como en Africa), lo > que dificulta la concienciación con respecto a los temas tratados por la > ICANN, aunque reconoce las dificultades operativas de la realización de las > reuniones. > > Saludos, > Vanessa Cravo > Brasil > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > [mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de > Fatima Cambronero Enviado el: jueves, 15 de noviembre de 2012 12:30 p.m. > Para: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > CC: LACRALO discussion list > Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Fwd: Declaración sobre la Estrategia Reunión > de ICANN > > Estimados, > > > Respecto de la Propuesta de Estrategia de Consolidación de Reuniones de > ICANN que se encuentra abierta a comentario público hasta el día de mañana > (16 de Noviembre a las 23.59 UTC), con Natalia Enciso hemos elaborado la > siguiente Declaración (está copiada debajo) que queremos someter a su > consideración. > > > En esta declaración hemos tenido en cuenta los diferentes comentarios que > han realizado algunos miembros de LACRALO en nuestra lista y además la > declaración elaborada por Tijani de AFRALO. > > > Hemos conversado con nuestro Presidente de LACRALO, José Arce, y como nos > queda poco tiempo, les solicitamos amablemente que por favor, revisen esta > declaración y realicen sus comentarios durante todo el día de hoy, así nos > queda tiempo el día de mañana para poder pasarlo al inglés e incluirlo como > comentario público a nombre de LACRALO. > > > También debido a la brevedad del tiempo, les queremos solicitar que por > favor si no están de acuerdo con alguna parte del texto, propongan la > redacción del texto que prefieren en su lugar, ya que los comentarios > generales van a demorar para poder ser elaborados e incluidos. > > > Muchas gracias. > > > Saludos cordiales, > > Fatima Cambronero > > > *Declaración de LACRALO sobre la Propuesta de Estrategia de Consolidación > de Reuniones de ICANN* > > LACRALO entiende las dificultades que el Personal encargado de las > reuniones de ICANN está teniendo para encontrar lugares adecuados para las > reuniones globales de ICANN en algunas regiones, especialmente porque la > comunidad ha ido creciendo en el último tiempo en tamaño y alcance. Valora > los esfuerzos para revisar el sistema de selección actual. Sin embargo > considera que no es el momento oportuno para hacerlo teniendo en cuenta que > se encuentra abierto un proceso de revisión del Marco de Regiones > Geográficas de ICANN donde el criterio de división de regiones de ICANN > podría quedar considerablemente modificado dependiendo del resultado de > este proceso. > > Asimismo, teniendo en cuenta el discurso del nuevo CEO de ICANN, Fadi > Chehadé en Toronto, uno de los objetivos de ICANN está enfocado en la > internacionalización de la organización. Por lo tanto, la falta de rotación > regional equitativa propuesta en esta Estrategia de Consolidación de > Reuniones estaría atentando contra este objetivo central de la nueva > gestión. > > En el sistema actual de selección de sedes de reuniones la rotación > regional se respeta de manera equitativa, ya que cada un año y medio > aproximadamente se realizan reuniones en la región de América Latina y > Caribe. Con la propuesta de Estrategia de Consolidación, las reuniones en > la región se realizarían cada tres años afectado la equidad en la rotación > regional, ya que los miembros de la comunidad local deberían esperar más > tiempo para tener posibilidades de participar personalmente de dichas > reuniones. Esto es un ciclo de vida muy largo teniendo en cuenta que los > mandatos de los principales Oficiales de nuestra región tienen una duración > de uno y dos años. > > Esta forma de rotación no igualitaria entre regiones impactaría en la real > participación de los usuarios y miembros de las ALSs de la región de > América Latina y Caribe, en la necesaria interacción que debe existir en > las reuniones públicas de ICANN entre los miembros de la comunidad y el > Board, afectando la transparencia que debe guiar a dichas reuniones. > Asimismo dificultaría la efectiva participación en las reuniones públicas > de aquellas personas y organizaciones que para poder asistir necesitan > financiarse por sus propios medios, ya que todos los años se debería viajar > a ciudades y regiones alejadas, y por lo tanto más costosas, de las > ciudades de origen. > > También consideramos importante resaltar que en la mayoría de los países > de América Latina y Caribe no se requiere visa para su ingreso. Esto debe > ser considerado una ventaja al lado de países como Estados Unidos y Canadá, > y por dicha razón no se les debe negar a los países de nuestra región la > posibilidad de ser sede de las reuniones de ICANN, sino solo cada tres años. > > También consideramos importante incluir otro posible impacto negativo de > la Propuesta de Estrategia de Consolidación de Reuniones y es el referido > al Programa de Fellowship de ICANN. Uno de los criterios más importantes y > que ha sido responsable del éxito de dicho programa es el referido a la > diversidad geográfica de sus participantes y a su proximidad respecto de > las sedes de las reuniones. Esto ha permitido que dicho programa se haya > enriquecido con participantes provenientes de todas las regiones de ICANN > participando de sus reuniones de manera equitativa a través de sus años de > vida. Con la propuesta Consolidada se afectaría la posibilidad de que > nuevos becarios de la región de América Latina y Caribe sean seleccionados > para participar de dicho programa, teniendo que esperar tres años para > tener la posibilidad de formar parte de él y de que ICANN cumpla con el > Outreach y el empoderamiento que son parte de sus objetivos. > > LACRALO está convencido de que una rotación igualitaria entre regiones es > importante para cumplir con la diversidad funcional, geográfica y cultural > de Internet consagrada en los Bylaws de ICANN. Por lo tanto, para respetar > una rotación regional equitativa consideramos que se debe seguir empleando > el sistema de selección actual de sedes de reuniones, y que en el caso de > tocarle a una región que no presente opciones de sedes que cumplan con los > requisitos solicitados por ICANN para ser sede de una reunión, se debe > pasar a la región que le siga en el cronograma de reuniones estipulados. La > región en cuestión, perdería el turno en esta oportunidad, debiendo esperar > a que se cumpla el ciclo de las cinco regiones, para poder volver a > postularse. De esta manera, se respeta el criterio de diversidad regional > de manera equitativa. Consideramos también necesario volver a revisar este > criterio una vez que se haya aprobado el Marco de Regiones Geográficas para > quede ajustado a la nueva realidad regional. > > > > > > ******************** > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ed79f9fa8f.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Utf-8? Q? Fwd = 3A_Declaraci = C3 = B3n_sobre_la_Estra? == Utf-8? Q? Tegia_Reuni = C3 = B3n_de_ICANN? =
by VanessaC＠anatel.gov.br Nov. 16, 2012

Nov. 16, 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =? Utf-8? Q? Fwd = 3A_Declaraci = C3 = B3n_sobre_la_Estra? == Utf-8? Q? Tegia_Reuni = C3 = B3n_de_ICANN? = From: VanessaC(a)anatel.gov.br Hello! Do not know if I can say, as I am not yet a member of any organization that integrates LACRALO. Either way, I should mention that I have been following the debate on this list from Toronto and it seems very appropriate the declaration made by Natalia and Fatima, because I share the view that the proposed strategy hinders the participation of stakeholders in our region (and in Africa), which makes the awareness about the issues addressed by the ICANN, while recognizing the operational difficulties of conducting meetings. Regards, Vanessa Cravo Brazil ----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Fatima Cambronero Posted on: Thursday, November 15, 2012 24:30 To lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: LACRALO discussion list Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: Statement on ICANN Meeting Strategy Dear, Regarding the Proposed Consolidation Strategy ICANN Meetings are open to public comment until tomorrow (November 16 at 23:59 UTC), with Natalia Enciso we developed the following statement (is copied below) that we want to submit for consideration. In this statement we have considered the various comments made by some members of LACRALO on our list and also the declaration made by Tijani AFRALO. We have talked to our LACRALO President Jose Arce, and as time is short, we kindly ask that you please review this declaration and make their comments throughout the day, so we have time tomorrow to pass English and include it as a public comment LACRALO name. Also because of the shortness of time, we want to ask us if they disagree with any part of the text, the wording proposed preferring instead as general comments will take to be developed and included . Thank you very much. Best regards, Fatima Cambronero * LACRALO Statement on the Proposed Consolidation Strategy ICANN Meetings * LACRALO understands the difficulties that the staff responsible for ICANN meetings is having to find suitable locations for global ICANN meetings in some regions, especially because the community has grown in recent times in size and scope. Appreciates the efforts to revise the current selection system.Considers however that is not the right time to do so considering that it is open a process of revision of the Framework of ICANN Geographic Regions where the criterion of division ICANN regions could be significantly modified depending on the outcome of this process. Also, considering the speech of the new CEO of ICANN, Fadi Chehade in Toronto, one of the objectives of ICANN is focused on the internationalization of the organization. Therefore, the lack of equitable regional rotation proposal in this consolidation strategy attacking Meeting this goal would be central to the new management. In the current system of selection of venues for regional rotation meetings equally respected as each approximately one and a half meetings are held in the region of Latin America and Caribbean. With the proposed consolidation strategy, regional meetings would be held every three years affected the equity in regional rotation, as members of the local community should wait longer to have a chance to personally participate in these meetings.This is a very long life cycle given that the mandates of the principal officers of our region have a duration of one to two years. This rotation is not equal between regions impact the real participation of the users and members of the ALS of the Latin America and Caribbean, the necessary interaction that must exist in ICANN public meetings between community members and the Board, affecting the transparency that should guide these meetings. Also hinder effective participation in public meetings of the people and organizations that need to be financed to attend on their own, because every year you should travel to cities and remote regions, and therefore more expensive, the cities of origin. We also considered important to note that in most of the countries of Latin America and Caribbean visa is not required for admission.This should be considered a plus next to countries like the U.S. and Canada, and for that reason can not be denied to countries in our region the opportunity to host ICANN meetings, but only every three years. We also consider it important to include other possible negative impact of the Proposed Consolidation Strategy Meetings and is referred to the ICANN Fellowship Program. One of the most important criteria and has been responsible for the success of this program is based on the geographical diversity of its participants and its proximity to the headquarters of the meetings. This has allowed the program has been enriched with participants from all regions of ICANN meetings participating equitably throughout his lifetime. With the consolidated proposal would affect the possibility of new scholars in the region of Latin America and the Caribbean are selected to participate in the program, having to wait three years to be able to be part of it and that ICANN meets the Outreach and empowerment that are part of their objectives. LACRALO is convinced that an equal rotation between regions is important to meet the functional, geographic and cultural Internet enshrined in ICANN Bylaws. Therefore, to respect regional rotation equitable believe should continue using the current selection system meeting venues, and in the case of touch to a region not present headquarters options that meet the requirements requested by ICANN to host a meeting, pass to the region next in the meeting schedule stipulated. The region in question, in turn lose this opportunity, having to wait for it to fulfill the cycle of the five regions, to run again. Thus, respecting the regional diversity criterion equally. Also consider necessary to revisit this approach once it has been approved for Geographic Regions Framework snug to new regional realities. ******************** _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/938ebc646e.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: [governance] Introduction to Internet Governance: Call for applications
by Fatima Cambronero Nov. 15, 2012

Nov. 15, 2012

FYI, ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ginger Paque <gpaque(a)gmail.com> Date: 2012/11/15 Subject: [governance] Introduction to Internet Governance: Call for applications To: "governance(a)lists.igcaucus.org" <governance(a)lists.igcaucus.org> Diplo's Introduction to IG will be offered online in February 2013. Please help us reach those who might be interested. See complete details at http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/IGCBP-foundation *You are involved in human rights online, but wickitee (WCIT) sounds like something used to play cricket, ETNO sounds like the name of a robot, and Baku like an exotic vacation spot. Or you know what SOPA/PIPA refers to (right: alphabet soup in Spanish), but FoE caught you off guard. Maybe you work on child safety issues every day, but need to understand the legal implications and complexities of jurisdiction in the borderless online world. One way to link the different issues (tech/social/development/economic/legal/security), and to fill in any gaps across professional and issue areas is to step back and take a look at the big picture of the overall issues. You can analyse how they affect each other, discuss the topics with colleagues who work in one area, and share your expertise in another. You can see how experts from different regions are addressing the same issues or different priorities. You can do this online, in just 8-10 hours a week, by participating in DiploFoundation’s Introduction to Internet Governance course, starting 18 February 2013. Call for applications DiploFoundation is currently accepting applications for its online course, Introduction to Internet Governance <http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/IGCBP-foundation>(IG). This course is designed to improve Internet policy and IG-related knowledge and skills for participants from both developed and developing countries. It empowers them to participate in global policy-making on IG, and stimulates critical and dynamic debate among individuals with different national, cultural, and stakeholder backgrounds. Participants focus on controversial IG topics from different perspectives: security/privacy, protection/human rights, economy/access, and other apparent dichotomies. About the course The Introduction to Internet Governance is spread over 10 weeks, starting with an online classroom orientation week, followed by 8 weeks of coursework, and a final exam week. The course introduces IG policy and covers five thematic areas - Infrastructure and Standardisation, Legal, Economic, Sociocultural, and Development aspects - and also has a section on IG processes and actors. Discussions will cover issues such as broadband policy; management of domain names and IP addresses, including the transition from IPv4 to IPv6; network neutrality; jurisdiction, intellectual property rights, open source and piracy; privacy protection; data security and cybersecurity; child protection; human rights; content management; digital signatures; emerging issues such as policies related to social networks and cloud computing, and more, with space for regional and other issues raised by participants. Learning activities take place in an online classroom and include the analysis of course materials; interactive group discussions using a variety of communication tools, assignments, and exams; and other dynamic methodologies. This course can be taken as follows: - As a DiploFoundation Certificate course Introduction to Internet Governance <http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/IGCBP-foundation> - As a University of Malta Accredited Course Introduction to Internet Governance <http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/IGCBP-foundation> (Request more information about the application process from admissions(a)diplomacy.edu) - As part of DiploFoundation’s and the University of Malta’s Master/PGD in Contemporary Diplomacy, with a specialisation area in Internet governance<http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/MAPGD> DiploFoundation’s Internet Governance Capacity Building Programme The course Introduction to Internet Governance is part of Diplo’s Internet Governance Capacity Building Programme (IGCBP)<http://www.diplomacy.edu/capacity/ig/programme>. The 2013 programme consists of five phases: - The Foundation Phase introduces the main IG issues through the course Introduction to Internet Governance<http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/IGCBP-foundation>. This course is recommended if you are new to IG, or perhaps an expert in one specific area and would like to obtain an overview of IG issues and observe how they interrelate. - The Thematic Phase offers in-depth courses that provide deeper understanding of a particular issue: either a specific professional area, or an area outside of your expertise that you need to learn more about. The topics include Cybersecurity<http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/IGCBP-Adv-security> , E-participation<http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/IGCBP-Adv-eparticipation> , History of Internet Governance<http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/IGCBP-Adv-history> , ICT Policy and Strategic Planning<http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/IGCBP-Adv-ICTstrategy> , Infrastructure and Critical Internet Resources<http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/IGCBP-Adv-Infrastructure> , Intellectual Property Rights<http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/IGCBP-Adv-IPR>, and Privacy and Personal Data Protection<http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/IGCBP-Adv-Privacy> . - The Research Phase offers valuable techniques if you are planning to undertake academic or policy research and writing. The Policy Research Methodology course <http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/policyresearch>addresses IG issues of relevance to participants’ respective countries and regions, and introduces action policy research with the aim of helping you develop solutions which you can apply in practice. - The Policy Immersion Phase is aimed at successful participants of the Foundation and Thematic Phases, and invites them to apply their knowledge and skills in the real-life policy space. - The Community of Practice Phase is an ongoing networking phase in which participants gather, work and network together around concrete projects in order to link the global policy process with local policy needs. Diplo offers many networking resources: an online community<http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/>, a blog dedicated to IG<http://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/Internet%20Governance>, month webinars<http://www.diplomacy.edu/calendar/type/Internet%20governance>, and other activities and events <http://www.diplomacy.edu/ig>. More information about the programme is available here<http://www.diplomacy.edu/capacity/ig/programme> . Languages The course materials, our e-learning platform, and the working language of the course is English. Applicants should consider whether their reading and writing skills in English are sufficient to follow university-level materials and discussion. Spanish, Portuguese, and French options may be offered. More information will be available later on possible second language options. In addition to English-speaking groups, a bilingual group may be formed for the course, having English as the primary language, and either Arabic, French, Spanish, or Portuguese as the secondary language for communication and interaction. This option will be offered depending on the needs of the applicants. Applicants to the bilingual groups (if offered) are asked to note that both languages are considered working languages within these groups. Reading and writing skills in English must be sufficient to understand learning materials and instructions, and for basic communication and interaction. Reading and writing skills in the second language must be sufficient for discussion and research purposes. Please request more information if you are interested in a second language option. Target audience Diplo seeks applications from the following categories of individuals from both developed and developing countries: - Officials in government ministries, departments, or institutions dealing with Information Society, Internet and ICT-related policy issues (e.g. telecommunications, education, foreign affairs, justice). - Postgraduate students, academics and researchers in the IG field (e.g. in telecommunications, electrical engineering, law, economics, development studies). - Civil society activists in the IG and Information Society fields. - Journalists covering IG issues. - Individuals in Internet-business fields (e.g. ISPs, software developers). This course may also be of interest to: - Practising diplomats, civil servants, and others working in international relations who want to refresh or expand their knowledge under the guidance of experienced practitioners and academics. - Postgraduate students of diplomacy or international relations wishing to study topics not offered through their university programmes or diplomatic academies and to gain deeper insight through interaction with practising diplomats. - Postgraduate students or practitioners in other fields seeking an entry point into the world of diplomacy. - Journalists, staff of international and non-governmental organisations, translators, business people and others who interact with diplomats and wish to improve their understanding of diplomacy-related topics. Timeline - 10 October: Call for applications for Introduction to Internet Governance begins - 17 December: Call for applications for Introduction to Internet Governance accredited course ends - 31 December: Call for applications for Introduction to Internet Governance certificate course ends - 18 January: Final selection results announced - 11 February: Classroom orientation week - 18 February: Introduction to Internet Governance course begins - To be announced: Call for applications for ICT Strategy and IG thematic courses begins Scholarships and fees Course fees depend on whether you wish to obtain university credit for the course: - €790 (University of Malta Accredited Course) - €600 (Diplo Certificate Course) A limited number of partial scholarships may be offered to participants from developing and emerging countries. As Diplo's ability to offer scholarship support is limited, you are strongly encouraged to seek scholarship funding directly from local or international institutions. Our guide to Finding Scholarships for Online Study <http://www.diplomacy.edu/poolbin.asp?IDPool=725> may provide you with some useful starting points. Requirements Applicants for the certificate course must have: - IG knowledge and/or experience of the multistakeholder approach in international affairs. - Sufficient ability in the English language to undertake postgraduate level studies (including reading academic texts, discussing complex concepts with other course participants, and submitting written essay assignments). - Fluency in the second language for the applicants to any of the bilingual groups (if offered). - Regular access to the Internet (dial-up connection is sufficient, although broadband is preferable). - A minimum of 8-10 hours commitment per week, and the readiness to participate in class online sessions (once a week at specified times). - An undergraduate university degree OR three years of related work experience. In addition to the above, applicants for the accredited course must also meet University of Malta prerequisites: - Bachelor's degree in a relevant subject with at least Second Class Honours. - Proof of English language proficiency obtained within the last two years (minimum requirements TOEFL: paper-based – 650; Internet-based – 95. IELTS: 6.5. Cambridge: Proficiency Certificate with Grade C or better). If, when applying, you are still waiting for your English language proficiency results, the University may issue a conditional letter of acceptance. Deadlines The deadline for applications for the accredited course is 17 December, 2012 The deadline for applications for the certificate course is 31 December, 2012 How to apply Choose your preferred option: - Apply for this course as a Diplo Certificate Course. More Information<http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/IGCBP-foundation>or Online Application Form<http://archive1.diplomacy.edu/registration/Register.aspx?IDprogramme=490f30…> - Apply for this course as a University of Malta Accredited Course University of Malta application form<http://www.diplomacy.edu/poolbin.asp?IDPool=1433>or write to Admissions(a)diplomacy.edu for more information - Take this course as part of the Master/PGD in Contemporary Diplomacy<http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/MAPGD> For more information, please visit http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/IGCBP-foundation Contact us at ig(a)diplomacy.edu (certificate course) or admissions(a)diplomacy.edu (University of Malta accredited course).* Ginger (Virginia) Paque VirginiaP(a)diplomacy.edu Diplo Foundation Internet Governance Capacity Building Programme www.diplomacy.edu/ig ** ** ____________________________________________________________ You received this message as a subscriber on the list: governance(a)lists.igcaucus.org To be removed from the list, visit: http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing For all other list information and functions, see: http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see: http://www.igcaucus.org/ Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t -- *Fatima Cambronero* Abogada-Argentina Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter: @facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero *Join the LACRALO/ICANN discussions:* https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es *Join the Diplo Internet Governance Community discussions:* http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/ *Join to the Internet Society (ISOC): *http://www.internetsociety.org/

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Regional Strategic Plan
by vanda＠uol.com.br Nov. 15, 2012

Nov. 15, 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Regional Strategic Plan From: vanda(a)uol.com.br I have not proposed to be representative or lead, but if the group to participate due necessarily involve in this work that no one will achieve success. assoporte to Fatima to lead this group and I am at the disposal to help. -------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Em 14/11/2012 20:46 s, Humberto Carrasco escreveu: Dear Jos: Following think your approach should be chosen who is Fátima. My voting is based on that Natalia and Vanda participaciny declinla has another representation. That is why following the criterion of positive discriminacin you implemented, my vote must be in Fátima. Regards On 11/14/2012 22:14, JosFrancisco Arce wrote: > Estimados, > > Gracias a todos por sus comentarios en la lista. Quiero comentarles que el > haber compartido este tema con ustedes trajo gran alegría en mí al ver los > entusiasmos de todos por trabajar por la región. Esto demuestra que, de a > poco, con lo grupos de trabajo actuales y los pequeños pasos que vamos > dando, se ven los avances de LACRALO. > > Respecto del tema que nos convoca, quiero comentarles que la composición > del grupo final debe ser equilibrado en todos los sentidos, y en > conversación con los demás participantes y con Rodrigo, me lleva a creer > que debemos apoyar en esta instancia la participación de mujeres. > > Devido a que por el Caribe solo Dev Anand se ha ofrecido, significa que por > Latinoamérica debemos elegir una mujer. Las que se manifestaron en la lista > fueron FATIMA, NATALIA y VANDA. Propongo que la región decida quién de > ellas va a ser la representante, si es que manifiestan su voluntad de > continuar. > > Tenemos para votar, hoy y mañana. La votación será informal y deberán > mandar su apoyo a la lista. El grupo de apoyo empezará a funcionar apenas > tengamos nuestros delegados, por lo que organizaremos con el staff una > llamada a tales fines. > > Asi mismo aprovecho y les comento que los representantes de LACARLO deberán > tener comunicación continua con las restantes ALSes de la región. Y que > personalmente estaré muy involucrado en este tema. > > Espero sus apoyos a las candidatas ¡!! > > Saludos > > José Arce.- > > > > > El 14 de noviembre de 2012 05:18, Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch apisan(a)unam.mx> escribió: > >> José, >> >> ¿y qué proceso vas a proponer que se siga para la selección de >> representante? Pienso que es responsabilidad tuya y de nadie más >> proponerlo, y que al hacerlo debes estar muy cerca de lo que los miembros >> de la comunidad necesitan para que tu propuesta solamente sea afinada y no >> totalmente rehecha desde cero en la comunidad. >> >> Saludos >> >> >> Alejandro Pisanty >> >> ! !! !!! !!!! >> NEW PHONE NUMBER - NUEVO NÚMERO DE TELÉFONO >> >> >> >> +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD >> >> +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO >> >> SMS +525541444475 >> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty >> UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico >> >> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty >> Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, >> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty >> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org >> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >> >> ________________________________________ >> Desde: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [ >> lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] en nombre de José >> Francisco Arce [josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com] >> Enviado el: martes, 13 de noviembre de 2012 06:32 >> Hasta: Natalia Enciso >> CC: LACRALO Español; lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Plan Estrategico Regional >> >> Hola a todos !!! >> >> Recién, recién he llegado a Argentina >> >> Me parece bien lo que propone Natalia, pero voy a hacer una aclaración. Los >> representantes, según solicito Rodrigo de la Parra, son de LACRALO, por lo >> que no están incluidos los miembros de ALAC, que seguro podrán participar >> en igual medida. Por lo que los miembros restantes deberíamos organizarnos. >> >> Nadie del Caribe se ha manifestado hasta el momento con interes en formar >> parte, por lo que los invito a sumarse y a que me escriban hasta el día 14 >> de Noviembre de 2012, 23:59 UTC, para poder tener tiempo de organizar. >> >> Me comunico pronto para ultimar detalles de la situación. >> >> Saludos >> >> Jose Arce.- >> >> >> >> El 11 de noviembre de 2012 11:16, Natalia Enciso >> escribió: >> >>> Hola Jose! >>> >>> Yo también estoy interesada, pero debido a que solo se elegirán 2 >>> candidatos: 1 de LA y 1 del Caribe; sugiero que todos los que estamos >>> interesados armemos un WG interno de LACRALO para que podamos proveer de >>> inputs a los que nos representen oficialmente en el grupo. >>> >>> No se como se hará la seleccion, si por votación o fist come first serve. >>> >>> Es mi sugerencia y saludos a todos >>> >>> Natalia >>> >>> El 10 de noviembre de 2012 19:49, Antonio Medina Gómez >> amedinagomez(a)gmail.com> escribió: >>> >>>> Buenas tardes a todos. >>>> Me gustaría sumarme a este grupo de trabajo >>>> Cordial saludo >>>> Antonio Medina Gòmez >>>> >>>> >>>> El 10 de noviembre de 2012 14:02, escribió: >>>> >>>>> Estimado Jose. >>>>> Me interesa sumarme. >>>>> >>>>> Saludos cordiales. >>>>> Adrian Carballo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar (http://www.movistar.com.ar ) >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: José Francisco Arce >>>>> Sender: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>>> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 11:17:31 >>>>> To: LACRALO EspaÃ±ol >>>>> Subject: [lac-discuss-es] Plan Estrategico Regional >>>>> >>>>> De acuerdo a los pasos a seguir para el Plan Estrategico Regional que >>> se >>>>> viene llevando a cabo desde hace ya un tiempo, es que antes del 16 de >>>>> noviembre deberemos apuntar a ese comite de trabajo a un >> representante >>> de >>>>> LACRALO del Caribe y a uno de Latinoamerica. >>>>> >>>>> Por lo que me gustaría que aquellos interesados me escriban para >> poder >>>>> comentarles en detalle y organizar el grupo. >>>>> >>>>> Saludos >>>>> >>>>> José Arce.- >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> lac-discuss-es mailing list >>>>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >>>>> >>>>> http://www.lacralo.org >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> lac-discuss-es mailing list >>>>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >>>>> >>>>> http://www.lacralo.org >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> lac-discuss-es mailing list >>>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >>>> >>>> http://www.lacralo.org >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> lac-discuss-es mailing list >>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >>> >>> http://www.lacralo.org >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> lac-discuss-es mailing list >> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> >> http://www.lacralo.org >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b9b4020cea.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Fwd = 3A_Declaraci = F3n_sobre_la_Est? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Rategia_Reuni = F3n_de_ICANN? =
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org Nov. 15, 2012

Nov. 15, 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? Fwd = 3A_Declaraci = F3n_sobre_la_Est? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Rategia_Reuni = F3n_de_ICANN? = From: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org I agree. Alberto Soto ----- Original Message ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] In the name of Fatima Cambronero Posted on: Thursday, November 15, 2012 24:30 To lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: LACRALO discussion list Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: Declaration of Reunin Strategy ICANN Dear, Regarding the proposed consolidation of Strategy Meetings ICANN is open for comment until da audience of tomorrow (November 16 at 23:59 UTC), with Natalia Enciso we have developed the following Declaration (estcopiada below) that we refer to it consideracin. In this Declaration we have considered the various comments been some LACRALO members on our list and in addition the Declaration drafted by Tijani AFRALO. We have talked to our President LACRALO, JosArce, and as we time is short, we kindly ask that you please review this declaraciny make their comments throughout the day today, donkeys is given in the morning time to pass it to include it as inglse Comment LACRALO audience to name. Also because of the shortness of time, I want to ask for Please if estn not agree with any part of the text, proposed the Text redaccin preferring instead, since comments general will take to be developed and included. Thank you very much. Best regards, Fatima Cambronero * Declaration of LACRALO on the proposed consolidation of Strategy ICANN Meetings * LACRALO understands the difficulties that the staff responsible for the meetings ICANN estteniendo to find suitable places for meetings ICANN global in some regions, especially since the community has been growing in the last time tamaoy scope. Appreciates the efforts to review the current selection system. However it is considered that the right time to do so considering that it is open a process of revision of the Framework ICANN geographic regions where the criterion for division of ICANN regions may be considerably modified depending on the outcome of this process. Also, considering the speech of the new CEO of ICANN, Fadi Chehaden Toronto, one objective of the ICANN estenfocado internationalization of the organization. Therefore, the lack of rotation equitable regional strategy proposed in this consolidation of Meetings will be attacking this central objective of the new Gestin. In the current system of selection of sites meeting the regional rotation respected equally, because each one year and a half meetings are held in the region from Latin America and the Caribbean. With the Consolidacin proposed strategy, the meetings in the region is held every three years affected the equity in regional rotation, and that members of the local community must wait more time to have opportunities to participate in such meetings personally. Namely a life cycle very long considering that the mandates of the Officers leading our region have a duration of one two years. This form of equal rotation among regions not impact the actual participation of the users and members of the ALS of the region of Amrica America and Caribbean, the necessary interaction that must exist in the pblicas ICANN meetings between community members and the Board, affecting the transparency that should guide these meetings. Also hampered the effective participation in meetings of pblicas those people and organizations who need to attend financed by their own means, as all years are must travel cities and remote regions, and therefore more expensive, cities origin. Also consider important to emphasize that in most of the countries of Amrica America and Caribbean visa is not required for admission. This should be considered an advantage alongside countries like United States and Canada, and Reason for this not to be denied our region passes the possibility to host ICANN meetings, but only every three years. Also consider important to include other possible negative impact of the Proposed consolidation of Strategy Meetings and is referred to ICANN Fellowship Program. One of the most important criteria and has been responsible for the success of this program is based on the geogrfica diversity of its participants and its proximity to the meetings venues.This has allowed the program has been enriched with participants from all regions of ICANN participating in meetings fairly Through his years of life. With the proposed consolidated affect the possibility of fellows from the region from Latin America and the Caribbean are selected to participate in the program, having to wait three years to have the opportunity to be part of that ICANN ly meets the Outreach and empowerment that are part of their objectives. LACRALO estconvencido that an equal rotation between regions is important to meet the functional diversity and cultural geogrfica Internet enshrined in the ICANN Bylaws. Therefore, to comply one consider equitable regional rotation to be followed using selection system meeting current branches and that in the case of touch to a region that does not have options of venues that meet ICANN requirements needed to host a meeting, you must pass region to the next in the set meeting schedule.The region in cuestin, in turn lose this opportunity, having to wait for compliance with the cycle of the five regions, to run again. Of Thus, the criterion respecting regional diversity so equitable. We consider also necessary to revisit this criterion once it has been approved Framework geographic regions to be adjusted to the new regional reality. 2012/11/15 <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto: Re: Fwd: Declaración sobre la Estrategia Reunión de ICANN > De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com > > Estoy totalmente de aprobar todos estos comentarios. El proporcionar > lejos y más evidencia de mi posición como enviado. > > > - Carlton > > > ============================== > Carlton Samuels A > Móvil: 876-818-1799 > * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * > ============================= > > > > > El Miércoles, 14 de noviembre 2012 a las 1:34 PM, Natalia Enciso < > natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com> escribió: > > > > (these are notes from the papers, icann bylaws etc, that can be > > used as > a > > base for the statement if You all considered it appropiately) > > > > > > Today the ICANN meeting serves the following purposes: > > Engages local communities in various regions on issues affecting > > them (outreach). ICANN needs to do more to encourage outreach and > > involvement from the global community. Taking one meeting every 3 > > year in LAC wont help achieving this goal, all the contrary. They > > are an important foundation of the ICANN multi-stakeholder model. > > > > It reinforces ICANNs global character it increases and widens > > participation from different countries. > > > > Icann bylaws. Section 2 core values. 4. Seeking and supporting > > broad, informed participation reflecting the functional, geographic, > > and > cultural > > diversity of the Internet at all levels of policy development and > > decision-making.possible. > > > > Section 3. NON-DISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT > > > > ICANN shall not apply its standards, policies, procedures, or > > practices inequitably or single out any particular party for > > disparate treatment unless justified by substantial and reasonable > > cause, such as the > promotion > > of effective competition. > > > > Fellowship: adding to What Dev said, The Fellowship program is > > designed toward ensuring geographic diversity and to include > > representatives from multiple ICANN regions. Following the New > > strategic plan would diminish > LAC > > possibility to apply. > > > > And, Fadi in his Torontos speech emphasized about the New > > internalization of Icann. Taking Icann to the Community and not the > > > > > http://www.icann.org/en/news/press/kits/toronto45/video-chehade-15oct1 > 2-en.htm > > > > Looking forward for your comments, > > > > Natalia > > > > Enviado desde mi iPad > > > > El 14/11/2012, a las 15:04, Dev Anand Teelucksingh > > <devtee(a)gmail.com> > > escribió: > > > > Perhaps this point could be made by a separate LACRALO statement: > > > > According to the ICANN Fellowship page at > > http://www.icann.org/en/about/participate/fellowships , Fellowships > > are awarded based on a mix of criteria including geographic > > proximity to meetings. Thus, more fellowships are awarded to persons > > in the geographic region of the ICANN meeting. > > > > With the proposed Consolidated Meeting Strategy impacting when ICANN > > meetings are held in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) and > > Africa, > this > > "geographic proximity to meetings" criterion for the award of ICANN > > fellowships for the meetings in Europe and Asia/Pacific from > > 2014-2016 should be adjusted to allow for more fellowships from > > persons in Africa > and > > the LAC regions. > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > Dev Anand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Carlton Samuels < > > carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Natalia: > >> There has been a change in the original plan for a joint > >> AFRALO/LACRALO statement. > >> > >> Tijani held the pen on the draft ALAC statement. And so ensured > >> the AFRALO perspective is adequately covered. Their main concern > >> was about visa > for > >> African attendees. > >> > >> If we think LACRALO issues are not properly addressed, we could add > >> to that draft ALAC statement. > >> > >> Best, > >> - Carlton > >> > >> ============================== > >> Carlton A Samuels > >> Mobile: 876-818-1799 > >> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > >> ============================= > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Natalia Enciso < > natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com > >> >wrote: > >> > >> > I agree to have a joint statement. But do we still have time? The > >> > vote announce have been made. > >> > Nati > >> > > >> > > >> > 2012/11/13 Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> > >> > > >> >> Recall the AFRALO Leadership proposed a joint AFRALO/LACRALO > Statement. > >> >> > >> >> Is there any interest? > >> >> - Carlton > >> >> > >> >> ============================== > >> >> Carlton A Samuels > >> >> Mobile: 876-818-1799 > >> >> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > >> >> > >> >> ============================= > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >> >> From: <alac-announce-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > >> >> Date: Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 7:00 AM > >> >> Subject: ALAC-Announce Digest, Vol 52, Issue 5 > >> >> To: alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> >> > >> >> VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the ICANN Consolidated > >> Meetings > >> >> Strategy Proposal (At-Large Staff) > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> > >> >> Message: 1 > >> >> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:23:50 +0000 (UTC) > >> >> From: "At-Large Staff" <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > >> >> Subject: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on > >> >> the > >> >> > >> >> Dear All, > >> >> > >> >> Olivier Cr?pin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a vote > >> >> be > >> held > >> >> by > >> >> the ALAC on the proposed "ALAC Statement on the ICANN > >> >> Consolidated Meetings Strategy > >> >> Proposal<https://community.icann.org/x/_5MoAg>" for > >> >> communication to the relevant parties. > >> >> > >> >> ***** > >> >> Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Statement > >> >> on > the > >> >> ICANN Consolidated Meetings Strategy Proposal< > >> >> https://community.icann.org/x/_5MoAg>" for communication to the > >> relevant > >> >> parties? > >> >> ***** > >> >> > >> >> Additional information on this Statement can be found on the > >> >> At-Large ICANN Consolidated Meetings Strategy Proposal > >> >> Workspace< https://community.icann.org/x/_5MoAg>. > >> >> > >> >> Please note that the poll will be open from 10-November-2012 > >> >> 00:01 > UTC > >> to > >> >> 15-Novemeber-2012 23:59 UTC. > >> >> > >> >> Regards, > >> >> > >> >> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, > Nathalie > >> >> Peregrine and Julia Charvolen > >> >> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > >> >> E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> ------------------------------ > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> lac-discuss-en mailing list > >> >> lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> lac-discuss-en mailing list > >> lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > >> > > > > > > > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b68592d98e.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: Declaración sobre la Estrategia Reunión de ICANN
by Fatima Cambronero Nov. 15, 2012

Nov. 15, 2012

Estimados, Respecto de la Propuesta de Estrategia de Consolidación de Reuniones de ICANN que se encuentra abierta a comentario público hasta el día de mañana (16 de Noviembre a las 23.59 UTC), con Natalia Enciso hemos elaborado la siguiente Declaración (está copiada debajo) que queremos someter a su consideración. En esta declaración hemos tenido en cuenta los diferentes comentarios que han realizado algunos miembros de LACRALO en nuestra lista y además la declaración elaborada por Tijani de AFRALO. Hemos conversado con nuestro Presidente de LACRALO, José Arce, y como nos queda poco tiempo, les solicitamos amablemente que por favor, revisen esta declaración y realicen sus comentarios durante todo el día de hoy, así nos queda tiempo el día de mañana para poder pasarlo al inglés e incluirlo como comentario público a nombre de LACRALO. También debido a la brevedad del tiempo, les queremos solicitar que por favor si no están de acuerdo con alguna parte del texto, propongan la redacción del texto que prefieren en su lugar, ya que los comentarios generales van a demorar para poder ser elaborados e incluidos. Muchas gracias. Saludos cordiales, Fatima Cambronero *Declaración de LACRALO sobre la Propuesta de Estrategia de Consolidación de Reuniones de ICANN* LACRALO entiende las dificultades que el Personal encargado de las reuniones de ICANN está teniendo para encontrar lugares adecuados para las reuniones globales de ICANN en algunas regiones, especialmente porque la comunidad ha ido creciendo en el último tiempo en tamaño y alcance. Valora los esfuerzos para revisar el sistema de selección actual. Sin embargo considera que no es el momento oportuno para hacerlo teniendo en cuenta que se encuentra abierto un proceso de revisión del Marco de Regiones Geográficas de ICANN donde el criterio de división de regiones de ICANN podría quedar considerablemente modificado dependiendo del resultado de este proceso. Asimismo, teniendo en cuenta el discurso del nuevo CEO de ICANN, Fadi Chehadé en Toronto, uno de los objetivos de ICANN está enfocado en la internacionalización de la organización. Por lo tanto, la falta de rotación regional equitativa propuesta en esta Estrategia de Consolidación de Reuniones estaría atentando contra este objetivo central de la nueva gestión. En el sistema actual de selección de sedes de reuniones la rotación regional se respeta de manera equitativa, ya que cada un año y medio aproximadamente se realizan reuniones en la región de América Latina y Caribe. Con la propuesta de Estrategia de Consolidación, las reuniones en la región se realizarían cada tres años afectado la equidad en la rotación regional, ya que los miembros de la comunidad local deberían esperar más tiempo para tener posibilidades de participar personalmente de dichas reuniones. Esto es un ciclo de vida muy largo teniendo en cuenta que los mandatos de los principales Oficiales de nuestra región tienen una duración de uno y dos años. Esta forma de rotación no igualitaria entre regiones impactaría en la real participación de los usuarios y miembros de las ALSs de la región de América Latina y Caribe, en la necesaria interacción que debe existir en las reuniones públicas de ICANN entre los miembros de la comunidad y el Board, afectando la transparencia que debe guiar a dichas reuniones. Asimismo dificultaría la efectiva participación en las reuniones públicas de aquellas personas y organizaciones que para poder asistir necesitan financiarse por sus propios medios, ya que todos los años se debería viajar a ciudades y regiones alejadas, y por lo tanto más costosas, de las ciudades de origen. También consideramos importante resaltar que en la mayoría de los países de América Latina y Caribe no se requiere visa para su ingreso. Esto debe ser considerado una ventaja al lado de países como Estados Unidos y Canadá, y por dicha razón no se les debe negar a los países de nuestra región la posibilidad de ser sede de las reuniones de ICANN, sino solo cada tres años. También consideramos importante incluir otro posible impacto negativo de la Propuesta de Estrategia de Consolidación de Reuniones y es el referido al Programa de Fellowship de ICANN. Uno de los criterios más importantes y que ha sido responsable del éxito de dicho programa es el referido a la diversidad geográfica de sus participantes y a su proximidad respecto de las sedes de las reuniones. Esto ha permitido que dicho programa se haya enriquecido con participantes provenientes de todas las regiones de ICANN participando de sus reuniones de manera equitativa a través de sus años de vida. Con la propuesta Consolidada se afectaría la posibilidad de que nuevos becarios de la región de América Latina y Caribe sean seleccionados para participar de dicho programa, teniendo que esperar tres años para tener la posibilidad de formar parte de él y de que ICANN cumpla con el Outreach y el empoderamiento que son parte de sus objetivos. LACRALO está convencido de que una rotación igualitaria entre regiones es importante para cumplir con la diversidad funcional, geográfica y cultural de Internet consagrada en los Bylaws de ICANN. Por lo tanto, para respetar una rotación regional equitativa consideramos que se debe seguir empleando el sistema de selección actual de sedes de reuniones, y que en el caso de tocarle a una región que no presente opciones de sedes que cumplan con los requisitos solicitados por ICANN para ser sede de una reunión, se debe pasar a la región que le siga en el cronograma de reuniones estipulados. La región en cuestión, perdería el turno en esta oportunidad, debiendo esperar a que se cumpla el ciclo de las cinco regiones, para poder volver a postularse. De esta manera, se respeta el criterio de diversidad regional de manera equitativa. Consideramos también necesario volver a revisar este criterio una vez que se haya aprobado el Marco de Regiones Geográficas para quede ajustado a la nueva realidad regional. 2012/11/15 <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto: Re: Fwd: Declaración sobre la Estrategia Reunión de ICANN > De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com > > Estoy totalmente de aprobar todos estos comentarios. El proporcionar > lejos y más > evidencia de mi posición como enviado. > > > - Carlton > > > ============================== > Carlton Samuels A > Móvil: 876-818-1799 > * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * > ============================= > > > > > El Miércoles, 14 de noviembre 2012 a las 1:34 PM, Natalia Enciso < > natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com> escribió: > > > > (these are notes from the papers, icann bylaws etc, that can be used as > a > > base for the statement if You all considered it appropiately) > > > > > > Today the ICANN meeting serves the following purposes: > > • Engages local communities in various regions on issues affecting them > > (outreach). ICANN needs to do more to encourage outreach and involvement > > from the global community. Taking one meeting every 3 year in LAC wont > > help achieving this goal, all the contrary. They are an important > > foundation of the ICANN multi-stakeholder model. > > > > • It reinforces ICANN’s global character – it increases and widens > > participation from different > > countries. > > > > Icann bylaws. Section 2 core values. 4. Seeking and supporting broad, > > informed participation reflecting the functional, geographic, and > cultural > > diversity of the Internet at all levels of policy development and > > decision-making.possible. > > > > Section 3. NON-DISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT > > > > ICANN shall not apply its standards, policies, procedures, or practices > > inequitably or single out any particular party for disparate treatment > > unless justified by substantial and reasonable cause, such as the > promotion > > of effective competition. > > > > Fellowship: adding to What Dev said, The Fellowship program is designed > > toward ensuring geographic diversity and to include representatives from > > multiple ICANN regions. Following the New strategic plan would diminish > LAC > > possibility to apply. > > > > And, Fadi in his Torontos speech emphasized about the New internalization > > of Icann. Taking Icann to the Community and not the Other way a round. > > > > > http://www.icann.org/en/news/press/kits/toronto45/video-chehade-15oct12-en.… > > > > Looking forward for your comments, > > > > Natalia > > > > Enviado desde mi iPad > > > > El 14/11/2012, a las 15:04, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee(a)gmail.com> > > escribió: > > > > Perhaps this point could be made by a separate LACRALO statement: > > > > According to the ICANN Fellowship page at > > http://www.icann.org/en/about/participate/fellowships , Fellowships are > > awarded based on a mix of criteria including geographic proximity to > > meetings. Thus, more fellowships are awarded to persons in the geographic > > region of the ICANN meeting. > > > > With the proposed Consolidated Meeting Strategy impacting when ICANN > > meetings are held in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) and Africa, > this > > "geographic proximity to meetings" criterion for the award of ICANN > > fellowships for the meetings in Europe and Asia/Pacific from 2014-2016 > > should be adjusted to allow for more fellowships from persons in Africa > and > > the LAC regions. > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > Dev Anand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Carlton Samuels < > > carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Natalia: > >> There has been a change in the original plan for a joint AFRALO/LACRALO > >> statement. > >> > >> Tijani held the pen on the draft ALAC statement. And so ensured the > >> AFRALO > >> perspective is adequately covered. Their main concern was about visa > for > >> African attendees. > >> > >> If we think LACRALO issues are not properly addressed, we could add to > >> that > >> draft ALAC statement. > >> > >> Best, > >> - Carlton > >> > >> ============================== > >> Carlton A Samuels > >> Mobile: 876-818-1799 > >> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > >> ============================= > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Natalia Enciso < > natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com > >> >wrote: > >> > >> > I agree to have a joint statement. But do we still have time? The vote > >> > announce have been made. > >> > Nati > >> > > >> > > >> > 2012/11/13 Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> > >> > > >> >> Recall the AFRALO Leadership proposed a joint AFRALO/LACRALO > Statement. > >> >> > >> >> Is there any interest? > >> >> - Carlton > >> >> > >> >> ============================== > >> >> Carlton A Samuels > >> >> Mobile: 876-818-1799 > >> >> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > >> >> > >> >> ============================= > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >> >> From: <alac-announce-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > >> >> Date: Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 7:00 AM > >> >> Subject: ALAC-Announce Digest, Vol 52, Issue 5 > >> >> To: alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> >> > >> >> VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the ICANN Consolidated > >> Meetings > >> >> Strategy Proposal (At-Large Staff) > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> > >> >> Message: 1 > >> >> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:23:50 +0000 (UTC) > >> >> From: "At-Large Staff" <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > >> >> Subject: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the > >> >> > >> >> Dear All, > >> >> > >> >> Olivier Cr?pin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a vote be > >> held > >> >> by > >> >> the ALAC on the proposed "ALAC Statement on the ICANN Consolidated > >> >> Meetings > >> >> Strategy Proposal<https://community.icann.org/x/_5MoAg>" for > >> >> communication > >> >> to the relevant parties. > >> >> > >> >> ***** > >> >> Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Statement on > the > >> >> ICANN Consolidated Meetings Strategy Proposal< > >> >> https://community.icann.org/x/_5MoAg>" for communication to the > >> relevant > >> >> parties? > >> >> ***** > >> >> > >> >> Additional information on this Statement can be found on the At-Large > >> >> ICANN > >> >> Consolidated Meetings Strategy Proposal Workspace< > >> >> https://community.icann.org/x/_5MoAg>. > >> >> > >> >> Please note that the poll will be open from 10-November-2012 00:01 > UTC > >> to > >> >> 15-Novemeber-2012 23:59 UTC. > >> >> > >> >> Regards, > >> >> > >> >> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, > Nathalie > >> >> Peregrine and Julia Charvolen > >> >> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > >> >> E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> ------------------------------ > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> lac-discuss-en mailing list > >> >> lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> lac-discuss-en mailing list > >> lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > >> > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (en) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/df194ce192.html > --]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > -- *Fatima Cambronero* Abogada-Argentina Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter: @facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero *Join the LACRALO/ICANN discussions:* https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es *Join the Diplo Internet Governance Community discussions:* http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/ *Join to the Internet Society (ISOC): *http://www.internetsociety.org/

5 4

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Windows-1252? Q? Fwd = 3A_Declaraci = F3n_sobre_la_E? == Windows-1252? Q? Strategia_Reuni = F3n_de_ICANN? =
by apisan＠unam.mx Nov. 15, 2012

Nov. 15, 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =? Windows-1252? Q? Fwd = 3A_Declaraci = F3n_sobre_la_E? == Windows-1252? Q? Strategia_Reuni = F3n_de_ICANN? = From: apisan(a)unam.mx Hello, I think that the proposal presented by Natalia Declaration and Fátima provides a good balance between opposites for efficiency in the organization of meetings, which also is in favor of the participants, and the Histórico mandate of ICANN to be near the communities in its diversity geogrfica. Additionally it has the benefit of being realistic about that we have not been prepared to bid reuniny sufficient sites creates the right incentive to do so by eliminating the automatic asignacin regions in the multi-year cycle of meetings. As, joint criteria we have expressed Vanda and I, with other members of the community who have also been expressed by colleagues in Africa in recent conversations (in the IGF in Bakentre other). So I spoke in favor of this proposal. Cordial greetings. Alejandro Pisanty ! ! ! !! NEW PHONE NUMBER - NUMBER OF NEW phone +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD FROM +525541444475 Mexico SMS +525541444475 Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM, 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the group on LinkedIn UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Fatima Cambronero [fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com] Posted on: Thursday, November 15, 2012 9:29 To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: LACRALO discussion list Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: Declaration on ICANN Reunin Strategy Dear, Regarding the proposed consolidation of Strategy Meetings ICANN is open for comment until da audience of tomorrow (November 16 at 23:59 UTC), with Natalia Enciso we have developed the following Declaration (estcopiada below) that we refer to it consideracin. In this Declaration we have considered the various comments been some LACRALO members on our list and in addition the Declaration drafted by Tijani AFRALO. We have talked to our President LACRALO, JosArce, and as we time is short, we kindly ask that you please review this declaraciny make their comments throughout the day today, donkeys is given in the morning time to pass it to include it as inglse Comment LACRALO audience to name. Also because of the shortness of time, I want to ask for Please if estn not agree with any part of the text, proposed the Text redaccin preferring instead, since comments general will take to be developed and included. Thank you very much. Best regards, Fatima Cambronero * Declaration of LACRALO on Consolidacin Strategy Proposal ICANN Meeting * LACRALO understands the difficulties that the staff responsible for the estteniendo ICANN meetings to find suitable places for ICANN global meetings in some regions, especially since the community has grown in scope tamaoy last time. Rate efforts to revise the current selection system. However considers that it is the right time to do so considering that is open a process of revision of the Framework Regions ICANN Geogrficas where the criterion of division of ICANN regions may be considerably modified depending on the outcome of this process. Also, considering the speech of the new CEO of ICANN, Fadi Chehaden Toronto, one objective of the ICANN estenfocado internationalization of the organization. Therefore, the lack of rotation equitable regional strategy proposed in this consolidation of Meetings will be attacking this central objective of the new Gestin. In the current system of selection of meeting venues the rotation regional respected equally, because each one year and a half meetings are held approximately in the region of Latin America ' Caribbean. With the proposed strategy Consolidacin, meetings the region were held every three years affected the equity in the rotation regional, as members of the local community must wait ms time to have a chance to participate personally in these meetings. This is a very long life cycle taking into account that mandates of key officers of our region have a Duracin one and two years. This form of equal rotation among regions not impact the actual participation of the users and members of the ALS of the region of Caribbean and Latin America ', in the necessary interaction that must exist in pblicas ICANN meetings between community members and Board, affecting the transparency that should guide these meetings. Also hampered the effective participation in meetings pblicas of those individuals and organizations that need to attend financed by their own means, as all years are must travel cities and remote regions, and hence more costly, than the hometowns. Also consider important to emphasize that in most of the countries of Amrica America and Caribbean visa is not required for admission. This should be considered an advantage alongside countries like United States and Canada, and Reason for this not to be denied our region passes the possibility to host ICANN meetings, only three years. Also consider important to include other possible negative impact of the Proposed consolidation of Strategy Meetings and is referred to ICANN Fellowship Program. One of the most important criteria and has been responsible for the success of this program is based on the geogrfica diversity of its participants and its proximity on the venues of the meetings.This has allowed the program has been enriched with participants from all regions of ICANN participating in meetings fairly Through his years of life. With the proposed consolidated affect the possibility of fellows from the region from Latin America and the Caribbean are selected to participate in the program, having to wait three years for have the opportunity to be part of ICANN ly that meets the Outreach and empowerment that are part of their objectives. LACRALO estconvencido that an equal rotation between regions is important to meet the functional diversity and cultural geogrfica Internet enshrined in the ICANN Bylaws. Therefore, to comply one consider equitable regional rotation to be followed using selection system meeting current branches and that in the case of touch to a region that does not have options of venues that meet ICANN requirements needed to host a meeting, you must move to the region next in the meeting schedule stipulated.The region in cuestin, lose the turn this time, and must wait to ensure compliance with the cycle of the five regions, in order to re- apply. Thus, the criterion is respected regional diversity equitably. We consider also necessary to revisit this criteria once approved the framework for geographic regions be adjusted to the new regional reality. 2012/11/15 <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto: Re: Fwd: Declaración sobre la Estrategia Reunión de ICANN > De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com > > Estoy totalmente de aprobar todos estos comentarios. El proporcionar > lejos y más > evidencia de mi posición como enviado. > > > - Carlton > > > ============================== > Carlton Samuels A > Móvil: 876-818-1799 > * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * > ============================= > > > > > El Miércoles, 14 de noviembre 2012 a las 1:34 PM, Natalia Enciso < > natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com> escribió: > > > > (these are notes from the papers, icann bylaws etc, that can be used as > a > > base for the statement if You all considered it appropiately) > > > > > > Today the ICANN meeting serves the following purposes: > > Engages local communities in various regions on issues affecting them > > (outreach). ICANN needs to do more to encourage outreach and involvement > > from the global community. Taking one meeting every 3 year in LAC wont > > help achieving this goal, all the contrary. They are an important > > foundation of the ICANN multi-stakeholder model. > > > > It reinforces ICANNs global character it increases and widens > > participation from different > > countries. > > > > Icann bylaws. Section 2 core values. 4. Seeking and supporting broad, > > informed participation reflecting the functional, geographic, and > cultural > > diversity of the Internet at all levels of policy development and > > decision-making.possible. > > > > Section 3. NON-DISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT > > > > ICANN shall not apply its standards, policies, procedures, or practices > > inequitably or single out any particular party for disparate treatment > > unless justified by substantial and reasonable cause, such as the > promotion > > of effective competition. > > > > Fellowship: adding to What Dev said, The Fellowship program is designed > > toward ensuring geographic diversity and to include representatives from > > multiple ICANN regions. Following the New strategic plan would diminish > LAC > > possibility to apply. > > > > And, Fadi in his Torontos speech emphasized about the New internalization > > of Icann. Taking Icann to the Community and not the Other way a round. > > > > > http://www.icann.org/en/news/press/kits/toronto45/video-chehade-15oct12-en.… > > > > Looking forward for your comments, > > > > Natalia > > > > Enviado desde mi iPad > > > > El 14/11/2012, a las 15:04, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee(a)gmail.com> > > escribió: > > > > Perhaps this point could be made by a separate LACRALO statement: > > > > According to the ICANN Fellowship page at > > http://www.icann.org/en/about/participate/fellowships , Fellowships are > > awarded based on a mix of criteria including geographic proximity to > > meetings. Thus, more fellowships are awarded to persons in the geographic > > region of the ICANN meeting. > > > > With the proposed Consolidated Meeting Strategy impacting when ICANN > > meetings are held in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) and Africa, > this > > "geographic proximity to meetings" criterion for the award of ICANN > > fellowships for the meetings in Europe and Asia/Pacific from 2014-2016 > > should be adjusted to allow for more fellowships from persons in Africa > and > > the LAC regions. > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > Dev Anand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Carlton Samuels < > > carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Natalia: > >> There has been a change in the original plan for a joint AFRALO/LACRALO > >> statement. > >> > >> Tijani held the pen on the draft ALAC statement. And so ensured the > >> AFRALO > >> perspective is adequately covered. Their main concern was about visa > for > >> African attendees. > >> > >> If we think LACRALO issues are not properly addressed, we could add to > >> that > >> draft ALAC statement. > >> > >> Best, > >> - Carlton > >> > >> ============================== > >> Carlton A Samuels > >> Mobile: 876-818-1799 > >> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > >> ============================= > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Natalia Enciso < > natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com > >> >wrote: > >> > >> > I agree to have a joint statement. But do we still have time? The vote > >> > announce have been made. > >> > Nati > >> > > >> > > >> > 2012/11/13 Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> > >> > > >> >> Recall the AFRALO Leadership proposed a joint AFRALO/LACRALO > Statement. > >> >> > >> >> Is there any interest? > >> >> - Carlton > >> >> > >> >> ============================== > >> >> Carlton A Samuels > >> >> Mobile: 876-818-1799 > >> >> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > >> >> > >> >> ============================= > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >> >> From: <alac-announce-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > >> >> Date: Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 7:00 AM > >> >> Subject: ALAC-Announce Digest, Vol 52, Issue 5 > >> >> To: alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> >> > >> >> VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the ICANN Consolidated > >> Meetings > >> >> Strategy Proposal (At-Large Staff) > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> > >> >> Message: 1 > >> >> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:23:50 +0000 (UTC) > >> >> From: "At-Large Staff" <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > >> >> Subject: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the > >> >> > >> >> Dear All, > >> >> > >> >> Olivier Cr?pin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a vote be > >> held > >> >> by > >> >> the ALAC on the proposed "ALAC Statement on the ICANN Consolidated > >> >> Meetings > >> >> Strategy Proposal<https://community.icann.org/x/_5MoAg>" for > >> >> communication > >> >> to the relevant parties. > >> >> > >> >> ***** > >> >> Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Statement on > the > >> >> ICANN Consolidated Meetings Strategy Proposal< > >> >> https://community.icann.org/x/_5MoAg>" for communication to the > >> relevant > >> >> parties? > >> >> ***** > >> >> > >> >> Additional information on this Statement can be found on the At-Large > >> >> ICANN > >> >> Consolidated Meetings Strategy Proposal Workspace< > >> >> https://community.icann.org/x/_5MoAg>. > >> >> > >> >> Please note that the poll will be open from 10-November-2012 00:01 > UTC > >> to > >> >> 15-Novemeber-2012 23:59 UTC. > >> >> > >> >> Regards, > >> >> > >> >> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, > Nathalie > >> >> Peregrine and Julia Charvolen > >> >> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > >> >> E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> ------------------------------ > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> lac-discuss-en mailing list > >> >> lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> lac-discuss-en mailing list > >> lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > >> > > > > > > > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/a85f4d5d01.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Utf-8? Q? Fwd = 3A_Declaraci = C3 = B3n_sobre_la_Estra? == Utf-8? Q? Tegia_Reuni = C3 = B3n_de_ICANN? =
by jumaropi＠yahoo.com Nov. 15, 2012

Nov. 15, 2012

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =? Utf-8? Q? Fwd = 3A_Declaraci = C3 = B3n_sobre_la_Estra? == Utf-8? Q? Tegia_Reuni = C3 = B3n_de_ICANN? = From: jumaropi(a)yahoo.com Hi Fatima, Natalie and Jose, Very good to have a statement LACRALO. I only corrected some things according to the texts and suggested sending the call corrected texts. In this paragraph: "In the current system (...) since each one and a half meetings are held approximately in the region of Latin America and Caribbean. With the proposed consolidation strategy, inthe region meetings would be held every three years affected the equity in the rotation regional, as members of the local community should expect more time to have a chance to participate personally in these meetings. This is a very long life cycle taking into account that Officers of the main mandates of our region have a duration one and two years. ' I suggest reads: "(...) Because about every year and a half meetings are held in the region of Latin America and Caribbean. "(...) "With the proposed consolidation strategy, our meetings in the region would be held every three years affected equality in the rotation regional. A relevant fact is that members of our local communities will have to wait longer to have involved such meetings personally. " Mainly the change has to do with the word equity. If we check their meanings, almost no sense to apply what we mean. According to the Dictionary of the Royal Spanish Academy of Language means: 1. f. Equanimity. 2. f. Temperance Benevolent usual. Propensity to be guided, or failure, of a sense of duty or conscience, rather than by the strict requirements of the law or by the final text of the law. 3. f. Natural justice, as opposed to the letter of the positive law. 4. f.Moderation in the price of things, or the conditions of the contracts. 5. f. Disposition of the mind which moves to give everyone what they deserve The word equality: As SAR means "pick and proportion that results from many parts that make up a whole evenly." That's why I consider the latter more suitable for what you want to say. The next paragraph begins: "This form of rotation (...) also hinder effective participation in public meetings of those individuals and organizations that need to attend financed by their own means, as every year should travel cities and remote regions, and hence more costly, than the hometowns. " I suggest that it looks like: "It hinder effective participation in public meetings of those people and organizations that need to be financed to attend on their own, because all the years must travel from their home cities and remote regions, and therefore more costly. " My two cents. Sincerely, JUAN MANUEL ROJAS Social Communicator President - AGEIA DENSI Colombia Twitter: @ JmanuRojas Join LACRALO: https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es ________________________________ From: Fatima Cambronero <fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com> To lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: LACRALO discussion list <lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Posted: Thursday, November 15, 2012 10:29 a.m. Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: Statement on ICANN Meeting Strategy Dear, Regarding the Proposed Consolidation Strategy Meetings ICANN is open for public comment until tomorrow (November 16 at 23:59 UTC), with Natalia Enciso we have developed the following statement (is copied below) that we refer to it consideration. In this statement we have considered the various comments been some LACRALO members on our list and further statement prepared by Tijani AFRALO. We have talked to our LACRALO President Jose Arce, and as we time is short, we kindly ask that you please review this statement and make their comments throughout the day, so we have time tomorrow to pass into English and included as public comment LACRALO name. Also because of the shortness of time, I want to ask for Please if you disagree with any part of the text, proposed the wording preferring instead, since comments general will take to be developed and included. Thank you very much. Best regards, Fatima Cambronero * LACRALO Statement on the Proposed Consolidation Strategy ICANN Meeting * LACRALO understands the difficulties that the staff responsible for the ICANN meetings are having to find suitable places for ICANN global meetings in some regions, especially since the community has grown in recent times in size and scope. Rate efforts to revise the current selection system. However considers that it is the right time to do so considering that is open review process Framework Regions ICANN Geographic where splitting criterion ICANN regions could be considerably modified depending on the outcome of this process. Also, considering the speech of the new CEO of ICANN, Fadi Chehade in Toronto, one of the objectives is focused on ICANN internationalization of the organization. Therefore, the lack of rotation equitable regional proposal in this consolidation strategy Meeting this goal would be attacking the new central management. In the current system of selection of meeting venues rotation regional respected equally, because each one and a half meetings are held approximately in the region of Latin America and Caribbean. With the proposed consolidation strategy, meetings the region would be held every three years affected the equity in the rotation regional, as members of the local community should expect more time to have a chance to participate personally in these meetings. This is a very long life cycle taking into account that Officers of the main mandates of our region have a duration one and two years. This rotation is not equal between regions impact the actual and user engagement members in the region of ALS Latin America and Caribbean, the necessary interaction that must exist in ICANN public meetings between community members and Board, affecting the transparency that should guide these meetings. Also hinder effective participation in public meetings of those individuals and organizations that need to attend financed by their own means, as every year should travel cities and remote regions, and hence more costly, than the hometowns. Importantly also considered in most countries Latin America and Caribbean visa is not required for admission. This should be considered an advantage alongside countries like the United States and Canada, and for this reason not be denied to countries in our region possibility to host ICANN meetings, only three years. We also consider it important to include other possible negative impact of the Proposed Consolidation Strategy Meetings and is referred to ICANN Fellowship Program. One of the most important criteria and has been responsible for the success of this program is based on the geographical diversity of its participants and its proximity on the venues of the meetings.This has allowed the program has been enriched with participants from all regions of ICANN participating in meetings equally through their years of life. With the proposed consolidated affect the possibility of fellows from the Latin America and Caribbean are selected to participate in the program, having to wait three years to have the opportunity to be part of it and that ICANN meets the Outreach and empowerment that are part of their objectives. LACRALO is convinced that an equal rotation between regions is important to meet the functional, geographic and cultural Internet enshrined in the ICANN Bylaws. Therefore, to comply consider equitable regional rotation to be followed using selection system meeting current branches and that in the case of play for a region not present options that meet headquarters ICANN requirements needed to host a meeting, you must move to the region next in the meeting schedule stipulated.The region concerned, in turn lose this opportunity, having to wait to ensure compliance with the cycle of the five regions, in order to re- apply. Thus, the criterion is respected regional diversity equitably. Also consider necessary to revisit this criteria once approved the Framework for Geographic Regions be adjusted to the new regional reality. 2012/11/15 <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto: Re: Fwd: Declaración sobre la Estrategia Reunión de ICANN > De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com > > Estoy totalmente de aprobar todos estos comentarios. El proporcionar > lejos y más > evidencia de mi posición como enviado. > > > - Carlton > > > ============================== > Carlton Samuels A > Móvil: 876-818-1799 > * Estrategia, Planificación, Gobierno, Evaluación y Turnaround * > ============================= > > > > > El Miércoles, 14 de noviembre 2012 a las 1:34 PM, Natalia Enciso < > natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com> escribió: > > > > (these are notes from the papers, icann bylaws etc, that can be used as > a > > base for the statement if You all considered it appropiately) > > > > > > Today the ICANN meeting serves the following purposes: > > • Engages local communities in various regions on issues affecting them > > (outreach). ICANN needs to do more to encourage outreach and involvement > > from the global community. Taking one meeting every 3 year in LAC wont > > help achieving this goal, all the contrary. They are an important > > foundation of the ICANN multi-stakeholder model. > > > > • It reinforces ICANN’s global character – it increases and widens > > participation from different > > countries. > > > > Icann bylaws. Section 2 core values. 4. Seeking and supporting broad, > > informed participation reflecting the functional, geographic, and > cultural > > diversity of the Internet at all levels of policy development and > > decision-making.possible. > > > > Section 3. NON-DISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT > > > > ICANN shall not apply its standards, policies, procedures, or practices > > inequitably or single out any particular party for disparate treatment > > unless justified by substantial and reasonable cause, such as the > promotion > > of effective competition. > > > > Fellowship: adding to What Dev said, The Fellowship program is designed > > toward ensuring geographic diversity and to include representatives from > > multiple ICANN regions. Following the New strategic plan would diminish > LAC > > possibility to apply. > > > > And, Fadi in his Torontos speech emphasized about the New internalization > > of Icann. Taking Icann to the Community and not the Other way a round. > > > > > http://www.icann.org/en/news/press/kits/toronto45/video-chehade-15oct12-en.… > > > > Looking forward for your comments, > > > > Natalia > > > > Enviado desde mi iPad > > > > El 14/11/2012, a las 15:04, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <devtee(a)gmail.com> > > escribió: > > > > Perhaps this point could be made by a separate LACRALO statement: > > > > According to the ICANN Fellowship page at > > http://www.icann.org/en/about/participate/fellowships , Fellowships are > > awarded based on a mix of criteria including geographic proximity to > > meetings. Thus, more fellowships are awarded to persons in the geographic > > region of the ICANN meeting. > > > > With the proposed Consolidated Meeting Strategy impacting when ICANN > > meetings are held in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) and Africa, > this > > "geographic proximity to meetings" criterion for the award of ICANN > > fellowships for the meetings in Europe and Asia/Pacific from 2014-2016 > > should be adjusted to allow for more fellowships from persons in Africa > and > > the LAC regions. > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > Dev Anand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Carlton Samuels < > > carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Natalia: > >> There has been a change in the original plan for a joint AFRALO/LACRALO > >> statement. > >> > >> Tijani held the pen on the draft ALAC statement. And so ensured the > >> AFRALO > >> perspective is adequately covered. Their main concern was about visa > for > >> African attendees. > >> > >> If we think LACRALO issues are not properly addressed, we could add to > >> that > >> draft ALAC statement. > >> > >> Best, > >> - Carlton > >> > >> ============================== > >> Carlton A Samuels > >> Mobile: 876-818-1799 > >> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > >> ============================= > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:39 AM, Natalia Enciso < > natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com > >> >wrote: > >> > >> > I agree to have a joint statement. But do we still have time? The vote > >> > announce have been made. > >> > Nati > >> > > >> > > >> > 2012/11/13 Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> > >> > > >> >> Recall the AFRALO Leadership proposed a joint AFRALO/LACRALO > Statement. > >> >> > >> >> Is there any interest? > >> >> - Carlton > >> >> > >> >> ============================== > >> >> Carlton A Samuels > >> >> Mobile: 876-818-1799 > >> >> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > >> >> > >> >> ============================= > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >> >> From: <alac-announce-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > >> >> Date: Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 7:00 AM > >> >> Subject: ALAC-Announce Digest, Vol 52, Issue 5 > >> >> To: alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> >> > >> >> VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the ICANN Consolidated > >> Meetings > >> >> Strategy Proposal (At-Large Staff) > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> > >> >> Message: 1 > >> >> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 11:23:50 +0000 (UTC) > >> >> From: "At-Large Staff" <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > >> >> Subject: [ALAC-Announce] VOTE ANNOUNCEMENT: ALAC Statement on the > >> >> > >> >> Dear All, > >> >> > >> >> Olivier Cr?pin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a vote be > >> held > >> >> by > >> >> the ALAC on the proposed "ALAC Statement on the ICANN Consolidated > >> >> Meetings > >> >> Strategy Proposal<https://community.icann.org/x/_5MoAg>" for > >> >> communication > >> >> to the relevant parties. > >> >> > >> >> ***** > >> >> Question: Do you support the ratification of the "ALAC Statement on > the > >> >> ICANN Consolidated Meetings Strategy Proposal< > >> >> https://community.icann.org/x/_5MoAg>" for communication to the > >> relevant > >> >> parties? > >> >> ***** > >> >> > >> >> Additional information on this Statement can be found on the At-Large > >> >> ICANN > >> >> Consolidated Meetings Strategy Proposal Workspace< > >> >> https://community.icann.org/x/_5MoAg>. > >> >> > >> >> Please note that the poll will be open from 10-November-2012 00:01 > UTC > >> to > >> >> 15-Novemeber-2012 23:59 UTC. > >> >> > >> >> Regards, > >> >> > >> >> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, > Nathalie > >> >> Peregrine and Julia Charvolen > >> >> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > >> >> E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> ------------------------------ > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> lac-discuss-en mailing list > >> >> lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > natalia.enciso(a)gmail.com > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> lac-discuss-en mailing list > >> lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > >> > > > > > > > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b9d23a0533.html --]]

1 0