February 2014 - lac-discuss-en

Fwd: Resolutions from the Meeting of the New gTLD Program Committee held in Los Angeles on 5 Feb 2014
by Carlton Samuels Feb. 9, 2014

Feb. 9, 2014

FYI ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-05feb14… > > > Approved Resolutions | Meeting of the New gTLD Program Committee > > > 5 February 2014 > > > 1. Main Agenda > > a. Remaining Items from Beijing, Durban and Buenos Aires GAC Advice: Updates and Actions Rationale for Resolution 2014.02.05.NG01 > > b. Discussion of Report on String Confusion Expert Determinations Rationale for Resolution 2014.02.05.NG02 > > c. Staff Update on Reassignment of Registry Agreements > > d. Staff Update on Name Collision Framework > > > > 1. Main Agenda: > > a. Remaining Items from Beijing, Durban and Buenos Aires GAC Advice: Updates and Actions > > Whereas, the GAC met during the ICANN 46 meeting in Beijing and issued a Communiqué on 11 April 2013 ("Beijing Communiqué"). > > Whereas, the GAC met during the ICANN 47 meeting in Durban and issued a Communiqué on 18 July 2013 ("Durban Communiqué"). > > Whereas, the GAC met during the ICANN 48 meeting in Buenos Aires and issued a Communiqué on 20 November 2013 ("Buenos Aires Communiqué"). > > Whereas, the NGPC adopted scorecards to respond to certain items of the GAC's advice in the Beijing Communiqué and the Durban Communiqué, which were adopted on 4 June 2013, 10 September 2013, and 28 September 2013. > > Whereas, the NGPC has developed another iteration of the scorecard to respond to certain remaining items of GAC advice in the Beijing Communiqué and the Durban Communiqué, and new advice in the Buenos Aires Communiqué. > > Whereas, the NGPC is undertaking this action pursuant to the authority granted to it by the Board on 10 April 2012, to exercise the ICANN Board's authority for any and all issues that may arise relating to the New gTLD Program. > > Resolved (2014.02.05.NG01), the NGPC adopts the "GAC Advice (Beijing, Durban, Buenos Aires): Actions and Updates" (5 February 2014), attached as Annex 1 ( http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-annex-1…) to this Resolution, in response to open items of Beijing, Durban and Buenos Aires GAC advice as presented in the scorecard. > > > > b. Discussion of Report on String Confusion Expert Determinations > > Whereas, on 10 October 2013 the Board Governance Committee (BGC) requested staff to draft a report for the NGPC on String Confusion Objections "setting out options for dealing with the situation raised within this Request, namely the differing outcomes of the String Confusion Objection Dispute Resolution process in similar disputes involving Amazon 's Applied-for String and TLDH's Applied-for String." > > Whereas, the NGPC is considering potential paths forward to address the perceived inconsistent Expert Determinations from the New gTLD Program String Confusion Objections process, including implementing a review mechanism. The review will be limited to the String Confusion Objection Expert Determinations for .CAR/.CARS and .CAM/.COM. > > Whereas, the proposed review mechanism, if implemented, would constitute a change to the current String Confusion Objection process in the New gTLD Applicant Guidebook. > > Whereas, the NGPC is undertaking this action pursuant to the authority granted to it by the Board on 10 April 2012, to exercise the ICANN Board's authority for any and all issues that may arise relating to the New gTLD Program. > > Resolved (2014.02.05.NG02), the NGPC directs the President and CEO, or his designee, to publish for public comment the proposed review mechanism for addressing perceived inconsistent Expert Determinations from the New gTLD Program String Confusion Objections process. > > > > c. Staff Update on Reassignment of Registry Agreements > > Item not considered. > > > d. Staff Update on Name Collision Framework > > Item not considered. > > > Published on 7 February 2014

1 0

? = Iso-8859-1 q = M == 3A_Comentarios E9tricas_de_ALAC = iso-8859-1 q = _solicitados???
by fatimacambronero＠gmail.com Feb. 8, 2014

Feb. 8, 2014

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject:? = Iso-8859-1 q = M == 3A_Comentarios E9tricas_de_ALAC = iso-8859-1 q = _solicitados??? From: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com Dear, Maureen Hilyard APRALO and member of WG metrics are ALAC comunictbNL> solicitarme me to comment on a model of self-evaluation that estproponiendo is for members of ALAC, in compliance with metrics in which esttrabajando. This model of self-evaluation that estproponiendo, estbasado a number of comments received from different RALOs. I'm not part of WG metrics, in this case I'm working with the request by Maureen. Perhaps LACRALO members are members of this WG or even Sergio committed to act as LACRALO link between WG and metrics, will be able to report on progress of this WG. In the link below and under the title * 2. Suggested Assessment Method: Self Evaluation by ALAC members, * is this model self-evaluation on which comments, ideas estsolicitando is, criticisms, proposals for improvement. This is the link to the Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ALAC+METRICS+-+FEEDBACK+PLEASE Because right now the comments do not Travs Wiki ESTN running, podrn send their comments directly to Maureen ( hilyard(a)oyster.net.ck) or in this thread to be collected and sent to her. At the end of this email podrn find the comments I sent Maureen I attulo staff. Thank you very much. Best Regards, Fatima Cambronero - First, if each member of ALAC will complete this table, you can happen that one who does not really honest to complete.Quin will control what is estcompletando fit reality? Not sure if it was a consensus that each member of ALAC should Auto-complete this table. If it was, from my point of view is not It is a good idea. We must remember that this is a voluntary role, the which we are already carrying a bunch of metrics. If in addition to all force them to complete this month this table, is a burden excessive for a volunteer job and besides that we risk does not conform to reality. Also there will be a mtrica for ALAC member who does not complete this table? In addition in this table only the date that is estingresando existila teleconference, no concrete estexplicando qutarea is done in such teleconference. I understand that participation in the conference is only criteria for measuring participation. And all activities a previous member of ALAC performed before attending the call?By example, read documents, organize the agenda, communicate privately with WG members for comments or ask warn that such call you are going to ask for a report of its activities, etc. All this should be measured tambine included in this evaluation? In this table a temple on "Tasks 2014" is included. I consider this not is appropriate because the tasks in the working groups for example are not always the same throughout the whole year. In any case MUST be separated by WG in which they participate and within it, the tasks concrete that develops in the WG per month. This will allow a better developed specific monitoring activities. Add a task GenRich for all year, from my point of view is no indicator for measure participation. - - * Fatima * Cambronero Attorney-Argentina Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter: @ facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero * Join the LACRALO / ICANN discussions: * https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es * Join the Diplo Internet Governance Community discussions: * http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/ * Join to the Internet Society (ISOC): * http://www.internetsociety.org/ _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0615b53f07.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Nomination for Secretary of LACRALO 2014-2015
by hcarrascob＠gmail.com Feb. 7, 2014

Feb. 7, 2014

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Nomination for Secretary of LACRALO 2014-2015 From: hcarrascob(a)gmail.com Hi Sylvia, I want to thank this expressly accept the nomination. A hug Humberto On 01/21/2014 3:19 pm, sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org wrote: > > Estimados todos, > > Es con gran placer y por estar convencida que realizará un fantástico > trabajo frente a la secretaria de LACRALO es que *_nomino a Humberto > Carrasco para Secretario de LACRALO para el periodo 2014-2015._* > > A pesar de poder postularme para un nuevo periodo, yo creo firmemente > en la rotación de los cargos y en que todos somos capaces de aportar > dinámicas y perspectivas diferentes para una misma función. Por ser > fiel a mis principios, además de por razones personales y, > principalmente porque creo haber cumplido con mi trabajo en esta > función en dos años consecutivos, no me postularé para el periodo > 2014-2015. > > Sin más, > > Saludos, > > Sylvia > > ___________________________________________________ > > Sylvia Herlein > > sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org <mailto:sylvia@internautabrasil.org> > > Secretaria LACRALO-ICANN/ 2012-2014 - http://atlarge.icann.org > <http://atlarge.icann.org/> > > Secretaria FLUI 2009-2015 > > sylvia_leite=Skype > > Descrição: Descrição: Assinatura_Sylvia_Internautabrasil > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/71d7f4705f.html --]]

1 0

? = Iso-8859-1 q = F3n = acceptance?
by presidencia＠internauta.org.ar Feb. 7, 2014

Feb. 7, 2014

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject:? = Iso-8859-1 q = F3n = acceptance? From: presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar Dear members LACRALO mailing this email to let me confirmed aceptacina the nomination as presidential candidate made LACRALO by johnny Laureano companion AUI Per. No more the atte greets you. * Sergio Salinas Porto Argentina President Internauta Argentina Association of Internet Users <http://www.internauta.org.ar> / CTA <http://ctamdq.org.ar> FLUI-American Federation of Internet Users <http://www.fuilatin.org> facebook: salinasporto <http://www.facebook.com/salinasporto> & sergiosalinasII <http://www.facebook.com/sergiosalinasII> twitter: sergiosalinas <http://twitter.com/sergiosalinas> Google+: Sergio Salinas Porto < https://plus.google.com/104639152443153592254/posts> Hangout: presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar <Hangout%3Apresidencia(a)internauta.org.ar> / Pixelhub: salinasporto <http://pixelhub.me/salinasporto> Youtube: salinasporto <http://www.youtube.com/salinasporto> Skype: internautaargentina Mobi: +54 9 223 5 215819 * * "Ojalpodamos be disobedient, whenever we receive orders that humiliate our conscience or violate our common sense "Eduardo Galeano * _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/8cf5811321.html --]]

1 0

REMINDER & dial-out?/ Board Member Selection Process Committee (BMSPC) Cross RALO Conference call
by At-Large Staff Feb. 6, 2014

Feb. 6, 2014

If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at:staff@atlarge.icann.org . **************** Dear All, The Board Member Selection Process Committee (BMSPC) invites you to a cross RALO conference call on Friday 7 February 2014 at 1700 UTC. This is the preferred time from the Doodle, across the 5 regions, hence only having ONE call. The purpose of this call is to explain the procedure to add candidates on the At-Large Board Candidate Evaluation Committee (BCEC) Slate. For other times: http://tinyurl.com/pycyyfl Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/bmspc/ The agenda and call details are available at: https://community.icann.org/x/_wLRAg Please note that this call will be held in English only, as insufficient interpretation requests. Wiki workspace: https://community.icann.org/x/tAafAg Conference ID 1638 http://adigo.com/icann/ If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at:staff@atlarge.icann.org . Thank you. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org One World, One Internet > On 02/02/2014 21:31, "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> wrote: > >> Dear All, >> The Board Member Selection Process Committee (BMSPC) would like to invite >> you to a cross RALO conference call on Friday 7 February 2014 in order to >> explain the procedure to add candidates on the At-Large Board Candidate >> Evaluation Committee (BCEC) Slate. In order to cover all five regions, two >> calls will be scheduled on that day. >> Please complete the attached Doodle poll to find the two preferred time >> slots. >> http://doodle.com/r97xd7m3em5aqmkw >> If you require interpretation for this call, please note the language next >> to your name on the Doodle poll - example: "name" + (ES) or (FR). >> Interpretation will only be provided if there is sufficient demand. >> The Doodle poll will close on Tuesday 4 February 2014 at 2000 UTC. The date >> and time will be announced shortly thereafter. >> Thank you. >> Regards, >> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie >> Peregrine and Julia Charvolen >> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >> E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >> One World, One Internet >> _______________________________________________ >> AFRI-Discuss mailing list >> AFRI-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss >> Homepage for the region: http://www.afralo.org >> Posting guidelines to ensure machine translations of emails sent to this list >> are more accurate: >> http://www.funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html#…>> e >> xo1 > > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC-Announce mailing list > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce > > At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org >

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] news out of LACRALO
by dacostabastidas＠dtech.ec Feb. 6, 2014

Feb. 6, 2014

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: news out of LACRALO From: dacostabastidas(a)dtech.ec Dear Jos The unique glow of Ana Camila, although it may sound common place. alinearsus lives with another essential prism under which it mirarn a kaleidoscope full of colors and unexpected ways. Welcome to your word, acuada now intimately with generous fullness and contemplation of happiness. Atte and contemplative algaraba to that makes me happy these aorar spontaneous moments of tenderness. Diego Acosta Bastidas On February 2, 2014, 8:32 JosFrancisco Arce < josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Estimados, > > Aprovecho un pequeño tiempo en la que Ana Camila duerme y les agradezco sus > palabras y buenos pensamiento. > > Empieza mi vida un nuevo camino, y es un placer poder compartirlo con > ustedes. > > Un gran abrazo a todos > > José.- > > > > > > El 31 de enero de 2014, 22:26, <sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org> escribió: > > > Queridos amigos, les escribo para informarles que la primera hijita de > Jose > > Arce, Ana Camila, ha nacido!!! > > > > Muchas felicidades para mi amigo José y su linda esposa Mary. > > > > Bienvenida Ana Camila!!! > > > > Sylvia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________ > > > > Sylvia Herlein > > > > <mailto:sylvia@internautabrasil.org> sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org > > > > Secretaria LACRALO-ICANN/ 2012-2014 - <http://atlarge.icann.org/> > > http://atlarge.icann.org > > > > Secretaria FLUI 2009-2015 > > > > sylvia_leite=Skype > > > > Descrição: Assinatura_Sylvia_Internautabrasil > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-es mailing list > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > > > -- > Arce, José F. > http://lnkd.in/bPdTThz > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/45580072b1.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] = iso-8859-1 == q 3A_De CONVOCATORIA_DE_COMENTARIOS = iso-8859-1 q = claraci F3n_de_Trusted_ == F3n_de_ALAC_sobre_la_Revisi = iso-8859-1 q = F3n_de_la_Comunidad_en_la_Zona_Ra = Representation????? EDz_? == iso-8859-1? q? DNSSEC_clave_de_firma_Ceremonias? =
by fatimacambronero＠gmail.com Feb. 6, 2014

Feb. 6, 2014

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: = iso-8859-1 == q 3A_De CONVOCATORIA_DE_COMENTARIOS = iso-8859-1 q = claraci F3n_de_Trusted_ == F3n_de_ALAC_sobre_la_Revisi = iso-8859-1 q = F3n_de_la_Comunidad_en_la_Zona_Ra = Representation????? EDz_? == iso-8859-1? q? DNSSEC_clave_de_firma_Ceremonias? = From: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com Dear, Ada thank you very much for your feedback and Alejandro. I have taken their own some comments I added more and I have summarized the main points on which we agreed. I sent these comments to the list of At-Large requesting that the added to the declaration has been made and some are modified points with which we do not agree. I have also requested the Staff to raise these reviews to Wiki Space this issue. Thanks Silvia Vivanco for publishing.At the moment Comments are locked in until Wikis solve an problem with an anonymous user comments outside estpublicando At-Large. Therefore, if someone needs to make sb Comment some Wiki debersolicitarle the Staff to the post in his name Next post: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org I would like to ask our President and Secretary to be available to the means and procedures to take these comments as LACRALO official position. Below I am copying the comments posted and published on the Wiki. Thank you very much. Best Regards, Fatima Cambronero --- Regarding the ALAC statement acerca Review of Trusted Community Representation in Root Zone DNSSEC Key Signing Ceremonies and based on the comments made in * LACRALO * These are the main points to be included in the ALAC statement. -We agree That the signing process of cryptographic keys That are at the basis of the DNSSEC reliability is of great importance. -The word "sacred" could be changed to "solemn" is a solemnity porque and its compliance is an essential requirement to the KSK process. -We Believe That the whole process of the ceremony itself is a guarantee of transparency and protection of users. It Should be Clearly Expressed more This Issue May Affect how Internet users. -The statement Should be expanded to the recognition of the unique combination and the key-signing of TCRs make broad participation, transparency and accountability in order to serve the core function of Enhancing and preserving the stability, security and resilience of the DNS, Widespread Malthus Engendering trust. -We do not believe any ALAC propose Should Increase in processes; Should be streamlining the direction. We ALSO CONSIDER it is not Necessary To Increase the number of TCR. This number is reasonable.These members Were selected According To clear Ensuring compliance with rules and requirements. -As for support for TCRs, a statement acting as TCR That Should be Those cost-neutral for FIRMS or not supported by other entities Should suffice. A statement in very restrained terms would go counter to the Possibility That the draft Suggesting be read as the poorly warranted creation of yet another source of travel funds. We Consider it important to Maintain the independence and accountability of the process That is being controlled. - We Believe That The entire last paragraph of the statement Should be removed. We do not agree with the reference to the "curiosity" of ALAC. Should not something that's of interest to ALAC. Also we do not agree to expand the pool of TCR. Please Take These comments into account to be included in the aforementioned statement. Fatima Cambronero ---- On February 4, 2014, 0:15, Aida Noblia <aidanoblia(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Estimada Fátima y todos: > > Releyendo el mail anterior ví en mi mensaje un error en el párrafo 5 ya que > no ví documento que establezca la posibilidad de que el designado TCR sea > separados del cargo. La posibilidad es no volverlo a designar y > eventualmente podría haber lugar a reclamar por responsabilidad, de > acuerdo a las reglas jurídicas generales. > > Saludos a todos > Aída > > > El 4 de febrero de 2014, 1:02, Aida Noblia <aidanoblia(a)gmail.com> > escribió: > > > Estimada Fátima : > > > > > > Estoy de acuerdo con el borrador de Salanieta, con las observaciones que > > hizo Olivier, salvo el tema de la financiación, en el que estoy de > acuerdo > > con Alejandro. > > > > La palabra "sagradas" del informe de Salanieta, si están de acuerdo > > podría ser cambiada por "solemnes", pues se trata de una solemnidad y su > > cumplimiento es un requisito esencial en el proceso de KSK. > > > > Respecto al control de responsabilidad de los TCR, lo que menciona > > Alejandro sobre la garantía de transparencia, rendición de cuentas, y > > defensa de los usuarios de Internet, ya se establece en forma genérica > el > > punto 9 de la Afirmación de Compromiso entre el Departamento de Comercio > de > > EEUU y la ICANN, (el primer documento citado por Salanieta). > > > > Además, todo el procedimiento mismo de la Ceremonia es una garantía de > > transparencia y defensa de los usuarios. Hay un control estricto y > > detallado en la Declaración de Prácticas del DNSSEC del procedimiento, > de > > acreditación de entrada de las personas, etc, para el Operador de la Zona > > Raíz (TCR), se establecen sus responsabilidades y cada uno de los pasos > > que debe cumplir lo que es propio de los documentos que regulan la > > seguridad en estos niveles de la raíz. > > > > También hay requisitos previos para la selección y el nombramiento de > los > > TCR, instrucciones para su función y los casos en que pueden ser > separados > > de sus cargos por no cumplir. Eso es parte del procedimiento técnico, > del > > que se encarga la empresa Verisign, especialista en el ramo. > > > > En cuanto al número de TCR, entiendo que es razonable ya que se > > postularon para el cargo, debiendo conocer y aceptar sus exigencias, > fueron > > seleccionados según reglas y controlado el cumplimiento de requisitos y > > está previsto que de los 21 seleccionados serán designados solo algunos > > para las dos ceremonias que se realizan simultáneamente en diferentes > > lugares, en 4 oportunidades cada año. La cantidad en más sería para > cubrir > > posibles imprevistos. > > > > En relación a financiación veo importante mantener estrictamente la > > independencia del procedimiento que se está controlando, entre quienes > son > > designados para controlar el proceso y quienes son los responsables del > > mismo, entre estos último ICANN. Esto, además de lo que expone Alejandro > y > > de que hay muchos viajes de cuyos costos de los que se podría y tal vez > se > > debería prescindir, dada la posibilidad de la participación a distancia, > lo > > que no es el caso de los TCR, que tienen que estar presentes físicamente. > > > > > > Por el momento no pude subir a la wiki el comentario > > > > Saludos a todos > > > > > > > > Aída > > > > > > > > > > El 2 de febrero de 2014, 18:10, Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com > >escribió: > > > > Fátima, > >> > >> mil gracias por este mensaje. El proceso descrito - firmado de "llaves" > >> criptográficas que están en la base de la confiabilidad de DNSSEC - es > de > >> gran importancia. > >> > >> En el espacio de ALAC se ha formulado un borrador de texto al que he > hecho > >> los siguientes comentarios: > >> > >> "The statement should be expanded to the recognition of the unique > >> combination the key-signing and TCRs make of broad participation, > >> transparency and accountability in order to serve the central function > of > >> preserving and enhancing the stability, security and resilience of the > >> DNS, > >> thus engendering widespread trust. > >> > >> > >> I do not believe ALAC should propose any increase in processes; > >> streamlining should be the direction. > >> > >> > >> As for support for TCRs, a statement that acting as a TCR should be > >> cost-neutral for those not supported by firms or other entities should > >> suffice. A statement in very restrained terms would go counter to the > >> possibility that the draft be read as suggesting the poorly warranted > >> creation of yet another source of travel funds." > >> > >> > >> Me permito presentar una moción a favor de que este texto sea > considerado > >> representativo de la opinión de LACRALO. > >> > >> > >> Alejandro Pisanty > >> > >> > >> 2014-01-31 <fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com>: > >> > >> > > >> > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > >> > > >> > Asunto: Fwd: CONVOCATORIA DE COMENTARIOS: Declaración de ALAC sobre > la > >> > Revisión de Trusted Representación de la Comunidad en la Zona Raíz > >> DNSSEC > >> > clave de firma Ceremonias > >> > De: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com > >> > > >> > FYI, > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > ---------- Mensaje reenviado ---------- > >> > De: ICANN At-Large <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > >> > Fecha: 2014-01-31 > >> > Asunto: [ALAC-Anuncie] SOLICITUD DE COMENTARIOS: Declaración de ALAC > >> > sobre la revisión del > >> > Representación de la Comunidad de confianza en la Zona Raíz DNSSEC > >> clave > >> > de firma Ceremonias > >> > Para: "alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" < > >> > alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Queridos todos, > >> > > >> > > >> > Olivier Crepin-Leblond, Presidente de la ALAC, ha pedido que un > >> llamado a > >> > la > >> > los comentarios se harán en el proyecto de "Declaración de ALAC > >> > sobre el examen de confianza > >> > Representación de la Comunidad en la Zona Raíz DNSSEC clave de firma > >> > Ceremonias < > >> > https://community.icann.org/x/nge6Ag>" > >> > Proceso de ratificación de ALAC. > >> > > >> > > >> > El proyecto actual, así como información adicional sobre el > comentario > >> > público, > >> > se puede encontrar en el At-Large Revisión de Trusted Comunidad > >> > Representación en > >> > Zona Raíz DNSSEC clave de firma Ceremonias Espacio de trabajo < > >> > https://community.icann.org/x/nge6Ag>. > >> > > >> > > >> > Por favor, envíe cualquier comentario sobre el área de trabajo > >> utilizando > >> > la función de comentarios por > >> > 7-Febrero-2014 23:59 > >> > > >> > > >> > Saludos, > >> > > >> > > >> > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, > Nathalie > >> > Peregrine y Julia Charvolen > >> > El personal de ICANN Política en apoyo de ALAC > >> > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > > >> > > >> > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/24c06a272d.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: ICANN News Alert -- Express Interest in Becoming a Panel Member for the New gTLD Program PIC Dispute Resolution Procedure
by Carlton Samuels Feb. 6, 2014

Feb. 6, 2014

FYI ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= [image: ICANN] <http://www.icann.org/> News Alert http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-05feb14-en.htm ------------------------------ Express Interest in Becoming a Panel Member for the New gTLD Program PIC Dispute Resolution Procedure 5 February 2014 ICANN is seeking Expressions of Interest to serve on the Public Interest Commitment Dispute Resolution Procedure Standing Panel. *Please send to PICDRP-SP-EOI(a)icann.org <PICDRP-SP-EOI(a)icann.org> by 19 February 2014*. Expressions of Interest will be maintained as confidential. Respondents are urged to read the PICDRP<http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/picdrp-19dec13-en.pdf>[PDF, 208 KB] prior to submitting an Expression of Interest. Background 1. As part of the New gTLD Program, ICANN has put in place the Public Interest Commitment Dispute Resolution Procedure<http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/agb/picdrp-19dec13-en.pdf>[PDF, 208 KB] ("PICDRP") to address reports of a Registry Operator's non-compliance with one or more of the public interest commitments included in Specification 11 of its Registry Agreement with ICANN. 2. During the compliance review and investigation process for a report submitted to ICANN under the PICDRP, ICANN may call upon the Standing Panel to review one or more reports in order to evaluate whether the Registry Operator was or was not in compliance with Specification 11 of the Registry Agreement. Composition of Standing Panel 1. The Standing Panel shall consist of a minimum of three members, with more members to be added as deemed necessary. Not all members of the Standing Panel are necessary to the consideration of each report referred by ICANN. 2. The Standing Panel members should have diversity in geographic and cultural representation. Diversity of experience will be considered in completing the composition of the Panel. Proposed Qualifications of Standing Panel Members 1. In consideration of the scope and areas of expertise required, that Standing Panel members, in the aggregate, should have expertise and significant knowledge in the following (or similar) aspects/areas. 1. Online content 2. Public policy 3. Trademark protection 4. International dispute resolution 5. Cultural studies 6. Judicial and/or legal experience 7. DNS technical experience 8. Regulatory background 9. Sociological research experience 10. Contract interpretation experience 11. Licensing experience 12. Cybersecurity 2. Panel members should have demonstrated recognition of expertise and knowledge through high-level positions, peer group recognition, and/or history of publications/presentations on relevant topics. Conflict of Interests All Panel members must be independent from ICANN (i.e., not an ICANN employee; not a member of any ICANN Sponsoring Organization or Advisory Committee; not affiliated with any registrar or registry holding a contract with ICANN). Further, all Panel members must adhere to ICANN's conflicts of interest policy and annually complete a Conflicts of Interest Disclosure Form. Time Commitment 1. To keep the costs and burdens of evaluation as low as possible, absent exceptional circumstances, the Standing Panel is expected to conduct its proceedings by email, by telephone and otherwise via the Internet. 2. It is anticipated that the Standing Panel may start to have matters referred to it by ICANN within one month of the Panel formation. The members of the Standing Panel will be required to review reference and training materials prior to receiving matters such that the Panel members understand the Public Interest Commitments Dispute Resolution Process. For each matter referred, the Standing Panel will be expected to evaluate compliance by the Registry Operator and report its evaluation results to ICANN. The Standing Panel is expected to deliver its evaluation results to ICANN within 15 days of reference by ICANN. 3. At present it is unclear how many matters will be referred to any given Standing Panel member; over time this may become more predictable based on the nature and number of the reports submitted. Fees for Service on Standing Panel Fees to be determined based on, among other things, proposals received. Terms of Standing Panel Member For the purpose of continuity and consistency, the terms of Standing Panel members will be staggered. For a start, the terms of two of the Standing Panel member shall be two (2) years and the term of the third member shall be one (1) year. Subsequent terms of new members and renewal of terms shall be two (2) years and members, with agreement from ICANN, are allowed to renew for a maximum of two (2) terms. Timing It is anticipated that the Standing Panel membership will be announced by end of March 2014. Submit an Expression of Interest Send an email to PICDRP-SP-EOI(a)icann.org by 19 February 2014. *[NOTE: This announcement was first published on newgtlds.icann.org <http://newgtlds.icann.org> in December 2013. The deadline for expressions of interest has been extended to 19 February 2014 and we're publishing here on icann.org <http://icann.org> to get the word out to a broader audience.]*

1 0

Meeting Invitation/ Board Member Selection Process Committee (BMSPC) Cross RALO Conference call
by At-Large Staff Feb. 5, 2014

Feb. 5, 2014

Dear All, The Board Member Selection Process Committee (BMSPC) invites you to a cross RALO conference call on Friday 7 February 2014 at 1700 UTC. This is the preferred time from the Doodle, across the 5 regions, hence only having ONE call. The purpose of this call is to explain the procedure to add candidates on the At-Large Board Candidate Evaluation Committee (BCEC) Slate. For other times: http://tinyurl.com/pycyyfl Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/bmspc/ The agenda (to be updated) and call details are available at: https://community.icann.org/x/_wLRAg Please note that this call will be held in English only, as insufficient interpretation requests. Wiki workspace: https://community.icann.org/x/tAafAg Conference ID 1638 http://adigo.com/icann/ If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at: mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> . Thank you. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org One World, One Internet On 02/02/2014 21:31, "ICANN At-Large Staff" <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> wrote: > Dear All, > The Board Member Selection Process Committee (BMSPC) would like to invite > you to a cross RALO conference call on Friday 7 February 2014 in order to > explain the procedure to add candidates on the At-Large Board Candidate > Evaluation Committee (BCEC) Slate. In order to cover all five regions, two > calls will be scheduled on that day. > > Please complete the attached Doodle poll to find the two preferred time > slots. > > http://doodle.com/r97xd7m3em5aqmkw > > If you require interpretation for this call, please note the language next > to your name on the Doodle poll - example: "name" + (ES) or (FR). > Interpretation will only be provided if there is sufficient demand. > > The Doodle poll will close on Tuesday 4 February 2014 at 2000 UTC. The date > and time will be announced shortly thereafter. > > Thank you. > > Regards, > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > Peregrine and Julia Charvolen > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > One World, One Internet > > > _______________________________________________ > AFRI-Discuss mailing list > AFRI-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/afri-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.afralo.org > > Posting guidelines to ensure machine translations of emails sent to this list > are more accurate: > http://www.funredes.org/mistica/english/emec/method_emec/presentation.html#… > xo1 >

1 0

Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Draft Criteria and Process for Selection of Multistakeholder Ethos Award Pilot Program
by Fatima Cambronero Feb. 4, 2014

Feb. 4, 2014

FYI, ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Date: 2014-02-04 Subject: [ALAC-Announce] CALL FOR COMMENTS: ALAC Statement on the Draft Criteria and Process for Selection of Multistakeholder Ethos Award Pilot Program To: "alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" < alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Dear All, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, has asked that a call for comments be made on the draft "ALAC Statement on the Draft Criteria and Process for Selection of Multistakeholder Ethos Award Pilot Program< https://community.icann.org/x/hgeuAg>" in preparation for the start of the ALAC ratification process. The current draft, as well as additional information on the Public Comment, can be found on the At-Large Draft Criteria and Process for Selection of Multistakeholder Ethos Award Pilot Program Workspace< https://community.icann.org/x/hgeuAg>. Please submit any comments on the workspace using the comments function by 09-Feb-2014 23:59 UTC. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> _______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org -- *Fatima Cambronero* Abogada-Argentina Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter: @facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero *Join the LACRALO/ICANN discussions:* https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es *Join the Diplo Internet Governance Community discussions:* http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/ *Join to the Internet Society (ISOC): *http://www.internetsociety.org/

1 0