April 2014 - lac-discuss-en

Re: [lac-discuss-en] R: R: VOTE RESULTS: 2014 Director-At-Large Board (Seat # 15) Selection Process
by vanda＠uol.com.br April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: R: R: VOTE RESULTS: 2014 Director-At-Large Board (Seat # 15) Selection Process From: vanda(a)uol.com.br Hi all, Normally the understanding of the NOMCOM is to Provide the best candidate That FulFil the lack of specific knowledge of the board, Considering Primarily the whole profile of the candidate and its Ability to perform in Such board. Each year Nomcom have a feedback from the Board on what kind of knowledge is now lacking in the running board. Also NOMCOM considers the profile of who is leaving the board each year and, if already defined, the new comers from SOs + AC. For instance, we already know That Rinalia Sebastien will substitute for 15th seat, so her profile is Considered Among all the Demands from the Board. Nowadays we are having quite professional support for external head hunter organization and capacitation on interview performance to Enhance That Are Ability to chose our lot always better candidates. Reviews, by other hand, as we review all bodies inside ICANN, are one of the best management Mechanisms ICANN has to present to the community. There is always room to improve and the reviews bring this opportunity to ICANN inside each group. All the best, Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av Paulista 1159, 1004 cj 01311-200 - Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 On 04/03/14 12:31, "Roberto Gaetano" <roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Carlton, > > I completely agree with you, the criteria Given to NomCom Have To Be > Thoroughly revised. > > Experience on large corporate boards has-been an indication Given to > NomCom in the past, but I believe That One of the key words in the great > Profile director is in aggregate. > > This means ideally That while a director has to not have an incredible > Knowledge > And experience, this is meant in the sense That the Board, as a whole, > Needs > To have this wealth of knowledge and experience, each and Not Necessarily > Every director. So, it might well not be that at Un certain moments there is not > Corporate boards large enough experience on the Board, and it will be > Legitimate to look for reinforcing this aspect, But This does not mean > That > All candidates not have Such que no item in the profile Should be > Discarded. To make an example, if large corporate boards is a need, > Non-profit boards is well another one. > > So the two big questions are: > > - How to cefine the requirements for NomCom > > - How to select the NomCom members (ie is the current mechanism > The best one?) > > Cheers, > > Roberto > > > > > > > >Da: Carlton Samuels [mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com] >Inviato: mercoledì 2 aprile 2014 02:56 >A: Roberto Gaetano >Cc: Sivasubramanian M; Kleinwächter, Wolfgang; >lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; Spanish version of lac-discuss; >Discussion for At-Large Europe; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >Discuss; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; NA Discuss >Oggetto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] R: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] >VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > >Roberto: > >I too believe what you're proposing is not just sensible but strategic and >in the overarching At-Large interest. > > > >Maybe its because of my position that on principle, I simply cannot accept >that in matters of governance and when part of a distant group and with >respect to decision-making, the representative should be obliged to 'take >the whip' - meaning follow the instructions - of his/her group. This is >my >position regardless of the size of the electorate; whether popularly >elected >or not, I have greats doubts that one can ever be confined & judged as >truly >reflecting the wishes of the constituency. > > > >Indeed at the onset, a few of us thought the liaison role properly >configured may likely have a more sustainable interest for the At-Large >than >the single voting director. So while we are largely agreed, I have one >quibble with your characterisation of the role of the NomCom; that set of >criteria utilised for selection of directors. > > > >In your estimation of this new role for the Board, I would hope that space >for more guidance is calculated so there is a balance in criteria between >persons having experience on 'large corporate boards' than those without. >And I say this in context of likely interpretation of the meaning of >'large'. For depending on who defines 'large', a whole set of likely >participants from my side of the world will enter the process already >disadvantaged. And that does not augur well for participation at that >level >for those of us at the edge of empire. > > > >Best, > >-Carlton > > > > > >============================== >Carlton A Samuels >Mobile: 876-818-1799 >Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround >============================= > > > >On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Roberto Gaetano ><roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >I have been one of the champions of the ALAC representation to the Board >with voting Directors, on par with the other supporting organizations. >So I believe that I cannot be suspected of anti-ALAC-ism if I now, years >later, argue that to fight for more Directors on the Board is a battle of >the past, that has little meaning looking at the evolution of the >organizazion and at a full realization of the multi-stakeholder model. >The multi-stakeholder model is not a parliamentarian model where the >stakeholder will get representation based on their relative "strength". >The >parliamentarian scheme is OK for an organization in its infancy, where the >constitution has to be drafted. In a mature organization, with basic laws >and behaviours already defined, the appointment of representatives by >constituencies inevitably brings in the Board the petty interests of the >different constituencies instead of having a sort of council of the elders >that abstracts from the contingent interests looking for the common good. >This has been the guideline that was attempted with the GNSO Review, >albeit >with only partial, although significant, results. >It is time to propose a different model for the Board as well, to get rid >as >much as possible of the system by which we have representative of >"parties" >that often have conflicting interests. >I believe that we should go towards reducing the SO-appointed Directors, >and >have instead a larger share, possibly a super-majority, appointed by >NomCom. >The NomCom should also get a precise description of the skill set that is >missing for that particular year, so that they can choose the names >accordingly. >Cheers, >Roberto > > > >> -----Messaggio originale----- >> Da: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:euro-discuss- >> bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M >> Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27 >> A: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang >> Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge- >> lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >afri-discuss@atlarge- >> lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; na- >> discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 > >> At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >> > >> Dear Wolfgang, >> >> The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to >ensure an >> independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but in >>the >> process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared >> responsibility in the selection process. >> >> A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would >positively >> demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi- >> stakeholder model of Governance. >> >> In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent and >> four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that At-Large >>has >> matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As you >have >> mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people, >> which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even >more. >> In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats which >would >> reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other >>Stakeholders >> might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the >Board, >> because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process. >> >> More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed by >>two >> different processes: >> >> 1) By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a candidate >and >> the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which could >> sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist >>within >> this AC at the moment. >> >> 2) By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an >>internal >> NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a >> process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered) >> >> Thank you. >> >> Sivasubramanian M >> India >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" < >> wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to >> > Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing >> > more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. >> > >> > I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA >> > transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are >> > remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine >> > voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, >> > 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine >> > (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be >> > established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of >>the >> Initial Board". >> > http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- >> en.htm# >> > V >> > >> > We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for >> > two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, >> chaired >> > by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting >> > Organisation >> > (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. >> > >> > http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h >> > tm#_toc523422641 >> > >> > In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an >> > At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional >> > councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory >> Committee" >> > (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the >> > establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the >> > board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC >> > was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to >> > the chair of the GAC). >> > >> > In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for >> > two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the >> > horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the >> > multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has >> > to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong >> > civil society role in policy development and decision making. >> > >> > Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos >> > both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and >> > NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and >> collaboration with >> > private sector, technical community and governments. A big >>challenge. >> > >> > Wolfgang >> > >> > >> > >> > wolfgang >> > >> > >> > >> > ________________________________ >> > >> > Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von >> > Veronica Cretu >> > Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 >> > An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >> > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; >> > apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; >> > na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large >> > Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process >> > >> > >> > >> > Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo >> > and build up on it, I would also like to: >> > >> > - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of >> > the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and >> > initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, so >> > this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who can >> > learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share >> > the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and >> > continue serve the community in the best possible ways. >> > >> > - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her >> > much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are >> > important times for ICANN which will require several key competences, >> > and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the >> > world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations on >the >> community-at-large. >> > >> > - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has >> > been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience >> > there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input >from >> members. >> > >> > On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home >> > safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! >> > >> > With very best, >> > Veronica >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond >> > <ocl(a)gih.com >> > >wrote: >> > >> > > Dear All, >> > > >> > > I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what >> > > was a very balanced election that required many rounds to >> > > differentiate the candidates. >> > > >> > > Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a >> > > moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for >> > > ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual >> > > General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take >> > > place in Los Angeles. >> > > >> > > Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is >> > > through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of >> > > options for the future of our community. >> > > >> > > Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation >> Committee. >> > > Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of >> > > candidates. >> > > >> > > Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process >> > > Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been >> > > challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties. >> > > >> > > The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons >> > > learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of >> > > recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. >> > > >> > > Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, >> > > the Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and >> > > would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the >> > > challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on >> > > the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community >> > > selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to >> > > share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board Colleagues >> > > and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of >ICANN. >> > > >> > > Kindest regards, >> > > >> > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond >> > > ALAC Chair >> > > >> > > On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: >> > > > Dear All, >> > > > >> > > > Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process >> > > > Committee >> > > (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote >> > > results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the >> > > ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be >> published. >> > > > >> > > > This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat >> > > > #15) >> > > Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. >> > > > >> > > > Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of >> > > > the >> > > family name) who ran for the position: >> > > > >> > > > * Rinalia Abdul Rahim >> > > > * Sébastien Bachollet >> > > > * Alan Greenberg >> > > > * Evan Leibovitch >> > > > * Jean-Jacques Subrenat >> > > > >> > > > After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie >> > > breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is >> > > selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for >> > > 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. >> > > > >> > > > You may review the results, as well as the detailed information >> > > > about >> > > the selection procedure, under: >>https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. >> > > > >> > > > Regards, >> > > > >> > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, >> > > > Nathalie >> > > Peregrine and Terri Agnew >> > > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >> > > > E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% >> > 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org ><mailto:3cmailto%3Astaff@atlarge.icann.org> > >> > > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >> > > >> > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7- >> B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi% >> > >> 20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G >> > isella%20Gruber,% >> > > >> > >> 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy >> %20St >> > aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org ><mailto:aff%2520in%2520support%2520of%2520ALACmailto%3Astaff@atlarge.icann >.o >rg> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > At-Large mailing list >> > > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large >> > > > >> > > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < >> > http://atlarge.icann.org/> >> > > > >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > EURO-Discuss mailing list >> > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> > > >> > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >> > > <http://www.euralo.org/> >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > *Veronica Cretu * >> > >> > >> > *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova >> > - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* >> > >> > *Member of the Steering Committee, * >> > *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* >> > * >> > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- >> and-cu >> > rrent-membership >> > < >> > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- >> and-cu >> > rrent-membership >> > >* >> > >> > *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet >> > Governance Forum (IGF)* >> > >> > *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 >> > <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* >> > >> > *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation >> > for Assigned Names and Numbering)* >> > >> > *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members >> > <http://www.icann.org< http://www.icann.org/> >* >> > >> > >> > >> > *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or >> > veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: >> 373 >> > 067435000* >> > _______________________________________________ >> > EURO-Discuss mailing list >> > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> > >> > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org >> > <http://www.euralo.org/> >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > APAC-Discuss mailing list >> > APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss >> > >> > Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy >> India +91 99524 03099 <tel:%2B91%2099524%2003099> >> _______________________________________________ >> EURO-Discuss mailing list >> EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss >> >> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > >_______________________________________________ >lac-discuss-es mailing list >lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > >http://www.lacralo.org > > > >_______________________________________________ >At-Large mailing list >At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3187d56fe5.html --]]

1 0

R: R: VOTE RESULTS: 2014 Director-At-Large Board (Seat # 15) Selection Process
by roberto_gaetano＠hotmail.com April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: R: R: VOTE RESULTS: 2014 Director-At-Large Board (Seat # 15) Selection Process From: roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com Carlton, I completely agree with you, the criteria Given to NomCom Have To Be thoroughly revised. Experience on large corporate boards has-been an indication Given to NomCom in the past, but I believe That One of the key words in the great Manager profile is in aggregate. This means ideally That while a director has to not have an incredible knowledge and experience, this is meant in the sense That the Board, as a whole, needs to have this wealth of knowledge and experience, each and Not Necessarily every director. So, it might well not be that at Un certain moments there is not corporate boards large enough experience on the Board, and it will be legitimate to look for reinforcing this aspect, But This does not mean That all candidates not have Such que no item in the profile Should be discarded.To make an example, if large corporate boards is a need, non-profit boards is well another one. So the two big questions are: - How to cefine the requirements for NomCom - How to select the NomCom members (ie is the current mechanism the best one?) Cheers, Roberto Da: Carlton Samuels [mailto: carlton.samuels @ gmail.com] Inviato: aprile 2014 2:56 mercoled2 A: Roberto Gaetano Cc: Sivasubramanian M; Kleinwchter, Wolfgang; lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; Spanish version of lac-discuss; Discussion At-Large for Europe; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Discuss; Announcements At-Large; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; Discuss NA Oggetto: Re: [lac-discuss-s] R [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 Director-At-Large Board (Seat # 15) Selection Process Roberto: I too believe what you're proposing is not just sensible but strategic and in the At-Large overarching interest. Maybe its Because of my position on That principle, I simply can not accept That in matters of governance and when to distant part of a group and with respect to decision-making, the representative Should be Obliged to 'take the whip '- meaning follow the instructions - of his / her group. This is my Regardless of the position size of the electorate; Whether popularly ELECTED or not, I have greats Doubts That one can ever be as truly confined & Judged reflecting the wishes of the constituency. Indeed at the onset, a few of us thought the liaison role properly May configured likely have a more sustainable interest for the At-Large than the single voting Director. So while we are Largely Agreed, I have one quibble with your Characterisation of the role of the NomCom; That set of utilised criteria for selection of directors. In your estimation of this new role for the Board, I would hope That space Calculated for more guidance is so there is a balance criteria in Between persons having experience on 'large corporate boards' than Those without. And I say this in context of likely interpretation of the meaning of 'Large'. For Depending on who defines 'large', a whole set of likely participants from my side of the world will enter the process Already Disadvantaged. And That does not augur well for participation one at that level For Those of us at the edge of empire. Best, -Carlton ============================== A Carlton Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround ============================= On Tue, April 1, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano(a)hotmail.com> wrote: I have been one of the champions of the ALAC representation to the Board Directors with voting, on par With the other supporting Organizations. So I believe That I can not be Suspected of anti-ALAC-ism if I now, years later, to argue That fight for more Directors on the Board is a battle of the past, That has little meaning looking at the evolution of the organizazion and at a full realization of the multi-stakeholder model. The multi-stakeholder model is not a model where the parliamentarian stakeholder will get representation based on Their relative "strength". The parliamentarian scheme is OK for an organization in its infancy, where the constitution has to be Drafted. In a mature organization, with basic laws and Behaviours already defined, by the appointment of Representatives Inevitably constituencies in the Board Brings the petty interests of the different constituencies instead of having a sort of council of the elders That abstracts from the contingent interests looking for the common good. This has-been the guideline That was Attempted With the GNSO Review, albeit with only partial, although significant, results. It is time to propose a different model for the Board as well, to get rid as much as possible of the system by Which info we have representative of "parties" That Often have conflicting interests. I Believe That We Should go towards Reducing the SO-appointed Directors, and instead have a larger share, possibly a super-majority, appointed by NomCom. The NomCom Should Also get a description of the skill sets September That is That particularly missing for year, so That They can choose the names accordingly. Cheers, Roberto > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:euro-discuss- > bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Sivasubramanian M > Inviato: domenica 30 marzo 2014 18:27 > A: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es@atlarge- > lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > lists.icann.org; At-Large Announcements; APRALO; At-Large Worldwide; na- > discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Oggetto: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [APAC-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 > At-Large Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > Dear Wolfgang, > > The original idea of nine Voting Directors was possibly conceived to > independent, user driven organization. NomCom was a good idea, but in the > process At-Large lost the seats in the Board, in exchange for shared > responsibility in the selection process. > > A better representation for At-Large, as originally envisaged, would > demonstrate that ICANN Governance is emphatically based on the multi- > stakeholder model of Governance. > > In the recent At-Large elections, we have had an effective incumbent and > four other qualified candidates, which goes on to prove that At-Large has > matured, has people sufficiently qualified for Board positions. As you > mentioned, we have the GNSO user communities with qualified people, > which increases the the number of available qualified candidates even > In this context, if we revisit the discussions on more Board seats which > reaffirm ICANN's faith in the multi-stakeholder model. Other Stakeholders > might welcome such a discussion to improve user participation in the > because it would essentially improve Trust in the ICANN process. > > More candidates from At-Large to Board positions could be appointed by two > different processes: > > 1) By the existing process whereby the AC selects / elects a candidate > the chosen person is appointed. This introduces an election which could > sometimes create differences, though such differences do not exist within > this AC at the moment. > > 2) By a process completely free of the Internal elections, by an internal > NomCom. (initial thoughts, there are various ways of designing such a > process, there are advantages and disadvantages to be considered) > > Thank you. > > Sivasubramanian M > India > > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" < > wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I also want to join the many thanks to Sebastian (great job), to > > Rinalia (great challenge) and Roberto and Tijani (well done). Nothing > > more to add what Veronica has said so nicely and well structured. > > > > I this context: DonŽt forget the History. In the present NTIA > > transition discussion a lot of "orginal ideas" from 1998 are > > remembered. One orginal idea was to give the At Large Membership nine > > voting seats. Article V, Section 4 of the Orginal Bylaws (November 6, > > 1998) said in para. iv: "Nine > > (9) At Large Directors, selected pursuant to a process to be > > established by a majority vote of all the At Large Board members of the > Initial Board". > > http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws/bylaws-06nov98- > en.htm# > > V > > > > We know the history. Five voting directors were elected in 2000 for > > two years. In November 2001 the At Large Membership Committee, > chaired > > by Carl Bildt, recommended the establishment of an At Large Supporting > > Organisation > > (ALSO) with the right to send six voting directors to the board. > > > > http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/at-large/final-report-05nov01.h > > tm#_toc523422641 > > > > In 2002, as part of the general ICANN reform process the ideas of an > > At Large elections and the establishment of an ALSO with six regional > > councils were abolished and were substituted by an "At Large Advisory > Committee" > > (ALAC) with five RALOs, a certification process for ALSs and the > > establishment of a NomCon which now sends eight directors to the > > board. The NomCom got five voting At Large Members. The chair of ALAC > > was invited to serve as a non-votong liaison in the Board (similar to > > the chair of the GAC). > > > > In the preparation for ATLAS I in Mexico in 2008 we were calling for > > two voting ALAC Board members. We got one. Now ATLAS II is at the > > horizon. We need a strong message from ATLAS II that the > > multistakeholder model - which is now under tough discussion and has > > to face its "moment of truth" - will work only, if you have a strong > > civil society role in policy development and decision making. > > > > Here we have to invest more how to do this and to go out of our silos > > both within the broader CS community (in particular with NCUC and > > NPOC) as well as in cross constituency communication, coordination and > collaboration with > > private sector, technical community and governments. A big challenge. > > > > Wolfgang > > > > > > > > wolfgang > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von > > Veronica Cretu > > Gesendet: Sa 29.03.2014 15:55 > > An: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; > > apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide; > > na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] VOTE RESULTS: 2014 At-Large > > Board Director (Seat #15) Selection Process > > > > > > > > Dear colleagues, dear Olivier - thanks for this message and to echo > > and build up on it, I would also like to: > > > > - Thank *Sebastian* for the work done in his capacity as a member of > > the Board and wish him success in the upcoming new roles and > > initiatives. We all continue building on our previous experiences, so > > this process should be a continuous exercise and include those who can > > learn from us - so, I am sure Sebastian will find good ways to share > > the wealth of expertise gained in his role as a Board member and > > continue serve the community in the best possible ways. > > > > - Congratulate *Rinalia* for being elected to the Board and wish her > > much luck in this interesting, yet, challenging new role. These are > > important times for ICANN which will require several key competences, > > and awareness of geo-political realities in different parts of the > > world. I trust Rinalia will be able to deliver on the expectations on > community-at-large. > > > > - Thank *Roberto* for the wonderful leadership of the BCEC - it has > > been for me, personally, a great experience. Like in any experience > > there are always things to learn from and improve based on the input > members. > > > > On this note, hope everyone attending ICANN 49 managed to return home > > safe & sound, otherwise, wishing you safe travels back home! > > > > With very best, > > Veronica > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond > > <ocl(a)gih.com > > >wrote: > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > I wanted to extend my congratulations to Rinalia Abdul Rahim in what > > > was a very balanced election that required many rounds to > > > differentiate the candidates. > > > > > > Rinalia has been selected by our community to sit on the Board at a > > > moment that is not only crucial for At-Large but also crucial for > > > ICANN as a whole. She will take her seat at the 2014 ICANN Annual > > > General Meeting - the last meeting of the year - which will take > > > place in Los Angeles. > > > > > > Thanks to all of the candidates who have run for the position. It is > > > through a wide candidate list that we can assure a wider choice of > > > options for the future of our community. > > > > > > Thanks to Roberto Gaetano and the Board Candidate Evaluation > Committee. > > > Their work has been crucial in providing a first class short-list of > > > candidates. > > > > > > Thanks to Tijani Ben Jemaa and the Board Member Selection Process > > > Committee for their stewardship of a process that has been > > > challenging due to the multiple instances of Ties. > > > > > > The work of these Committees is not over. They will analyse lessons > > > learnt and work together to provide the ALAC with an updated set of > > > recommendations to improve the selection process next time around. > > > > > > Finally, I would like to remind you that until the 2014 ICANN AGM, > > > the Board Member selected by At-Large is Sébastien Bachollet and > > > would like to reaffirm the full support of our community in the > > > challenging months ahead of us. We are well aware that he is not on > > > the Board to "represent us" but as a candidate from our community > > > selected to the Board by our community, he has proven himself to > > > share his experience of Internet End Users with his Board Colleagues > > > and we are grateful of his continued involvement in all matters of > > > > > > Kindest regards, > > > > > > Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond > > > ALAC Chair > > > > > > On 26/03/2014 15:06, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Board Member Selection Process > > > > Committee > > > (BMSPC) 2014, has asked that an announcement on the final vote > > > results of the Board Director (Seat #15) selected by the > > > ALAC/At-Large for 2015-2017 (to take their seat at the 2014 AGM) be > published. > > > > > > > > This is to inform you that the 2014 At-Large Board Director (Seat > > > > #15) > > > Selection Process was completed on 25-March-2014. > > > > > > > > Below is the list of candidates (listed in alphabetical order of > > > > the > > > family name) who ran for the position: > > > > > > > > * Rinalia Abdul Rahim > > > > * Sébastien Bachollet > > > > * Alan Greenberg > > > > * Evan Leibovitch > > > > * Jean-Jacques Subrenat > > > > > > > > After the FIRST ROUND VOTE and the SECOND ROUND's first vote, tie > > > breaking vote, and second (final) vote, the candidate who is > > > selected as the Board Director (Seat #15) by ALAC/At-Large for > > > 2015-2017 is: Rinalia Abdul Rahim. > > > > > > > > You may review the results, as well as the detailed information > > > > about > > > the selection procedure, under: https://community.icann.org/x/WinRAg. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, > > > > Nathalie > > > Peregrine and Terri Agnew > > > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > > > E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org% > > 3cmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > > > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > > <applewebdata://68497759-1B04-4F9B-84B7- > B9445B8F305F/Regards,%20Heidi% > > > 20Ullrich,%20Silvia%20Vivanco,%20Matt%20Ashtiani,%20Ariel%20Liang,%20G > > isella%20Gruber,% > > > > > > 20Nathalie%20Peregrine%20and%20Julia%20Charvolen%20ICANN%20Policy > %20St > > aff%20in%20support%20of%20ALACmailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org rg> > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > At-Large mailing list > > > > At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > > > > > > > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org < > > http://atlarge.icann.org/> > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > > <http://www.euralo.org/> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Veronica Cretu * > > > > > > *President, Open Government Institute**Republic of Moldova > > - http://opengov.si.md/ <http://opengov.si.md/>* > > > > *Member of the Steering Committee, * > > *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* > > * > > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > and-cu > > rrent-membership > > < > > http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/steering-committee/role- > and-cu > > rrent-membership > > >* > > > > *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet > > Governance Forum (IGF)* > > > > *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/component/content/article/1549 > > <http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/>* > > > > *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation > > for Assigned Names and Numbering)* > > > > *http://www.icann.org/en/groups/nomcom/2014/members > > <http://www.icann.org< http://www.icann.org/> >* > > > > > > > > *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com <veronicacretu(a)gmail.com> and/or > > veronica(a)cretu.md <veronica(a)cretu.md>Skype: veronicacretu Phone: > 373 > > 067435000* > > _______________________________________________ > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > <http://www.euralo.org/> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > APAC-Discuss mailing list > > APAC-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss > > > > Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org > > > > > > -- > Sivasubramanian Muthusamy > India +91 99524 03099 <tel:%2B91%2099524%2003099> > _______________________________________________ > EURO-Discuss mailing list > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/fed96952b9.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] CROPP Program
by cveraq＠gmail.com April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: CROPP Program From: cveraq(a)gmail.com Excellent proposal and action congratulations and thanks Carlos Vera Quintana 0988141143 Follow me @ cveraq > El 02/04/2014, a las 23:02, "Alberto Soto" <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> escribió: > > Estimados, como ya habrán visto hace tiempo en la lista, estaba coordinando > en dos países (HAITI y REPUBLICA DOMINICANA), para realizar reuniones en las > respectivas capitales, a fin de tratar de obtener organizaciones que puedan > certificar como ALS. También por otro mail solicité si alguien dominaba el > francés, y lo conseguimos. > > > > Luego de muchas coordinaciones, hemos presentado los dos proyectos y > entregados a Dev Anand Teelucksingh el jueves 27 de marzo, y quedamos en > espera de respuesta. > > Hemos realizado un esfuerzo importante, coordinando con representantes de > ambos países, y logrado de los sponsors locales un gran entusiasmo por > tratar de dejar de ser un país que no tenga una organización que represente > a los usuarios finales de Internet. En Haití hay dos organizaciones > involucradas y están procurando incorporar a más, y en República Dominicana > ya hay tres, dos institutos educativos de nivel superior y uno > gubernamental. Todo esto de acuerdo con el modelo de múltiples partes > interesadas. > > > > A su vez, para los primeros días de mayo (7, 8 y 9) he sido invitado a > dictar una conferencia magistral y un taller en el CONGRESO LATINOAMERICANO > DE INGENIERIA DE SISTEMAS E INFORMATICA y las JORNADAS NACIONALES DEN CLOUD > COMPUTING, en Cochabamba, BOLIVIA. En este caso, pese a que los > organizadores no pueden costear lo necesario para mi presencia, y no hay > tiempo para hacer una solicitud en el programa CROPP, asumiré los costos > involucrados. Allí por la importancia del tema, han incluido una tercera > participación mía, y daré un seminario, similar a los que se dictarán en > PUERTO PRÍNCIPE , HAITÍ, Y SANTO DOMINGO, REPÚBLICA DOMINICANA. > > > > Los seminarios se denominarán:” El rol de los usuarios en la Gobernanza de > Internet” > > > > Y el temario a desarrollar será el siguiente: > > > > - Gobernanza de Internet > > - ICANN: Misión, visión, Ecosistema de Internet > > - Organizaciones At-Large: Su participación en las distintas > regiones geográficas de ICANN. Región Latinoamérica y Caribe (LACRALO) > > - Como involucrase como organización At-Large > > > > Solo esperamos la aprobación de los proyectos en el programa CROPP. > > > > Saludos cordiales > > > > Alberto Soto > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/a8bd734aa4.html --]]

1 0

CROPP Program
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: CROPP Program From: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org Dear, as long habrn seen on the list, was coordinating in two passes (and HAITI DOMINICAN REPUBLIC), for meetings capitals, to seek organizations that can certified as ALS. Also solicit another mail if anyone dominated the francs, and we got it. After much coordination, we have presented the two projects and Dev Anand Teelucksingh delivered on Thursday, 27 March, and were in waiting for reply. We have made a significant effort, coordinating with representatives of both countries, and local sponsors achieved great enthusiasm for try to stop being a country that does not have an organization that represents to end users.In Haithay two organizations involved and trying to incorporate ESTN ams, and Dominican Republic there are three, two educational institutes of higher level and one government. All this according to the model of multiple parties interested. In turn, for the first days of May (7, 8 and 9) have been invited to give a lecture and a workshop LATIN AMERICAN CONGRESS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY NATIONAL CONFERENCE and DEN CLOUD COMPUTING in Cochabamba, BOLIVIA. In this case, although the organizers can not afford what is necessary to me, and no time to make a request for the CROPP program costs assume them involved. Allpor the importance of the issue, have included a third participacinma and darun seminar, similar to those in dictarn PUERTO Prince, HAITI AND SANTO DOMINGO, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC. The seminars denominarn: The role of users in Governance Internet And the agenda to develop next serel: - Internet Governance - ICANN: Mission, vision, Internet Ecosystem - At-Large Organizations: Your participation in the various ICANN geographic regions. Latinoamrica and Caribbean region (LACRALO) - How to get involved as an organization At-Large Just wait for the approval of projects in CROPP program. Best Regards Alberto Soto _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/5617dc989a.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: [fellowships-alumni] How to become a member? | IndividualUsers
by José Francisco Arce April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

FYI ---------- Mensaje reenviado ---------- De: "Tracy F. Hackshaw @ Google" <tracyhackshaw(a)gmail.com> Fecha: abr 2, 2014 10:08 PM Asunto: [fellowships-alumni] How to become a member? | IndividualUsers Para: "Fellowships-alumni(a)icann.org" <fellowships-alumni(a)icann.org> Cc: In case you were living under a rock ... ;) http://individualusers.org/?page_id=8 ------ Rgds, Tracy

1 0

Earthquake in Chile
by presidencia＠internauta.org.ar April 3, 2014

April 3, 2014

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Earthquake in Chile From: presidencia(a)internauta.org.ar Dear Humberto and Javier. Are you and your family well? _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/8b58888913.html --]]

2 1

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Earthquake in Chile
by vanda＠uol.com.br April 2, 2014

April 2, 2014

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Earthquake in Chile From: vanda(a)uol.com.br Humberto Glad that the population is so well prepared for estes terrible disasters. Hugs Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av Paulista 1159, 1004 cj 01311-200 - Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 On 04/02/14 9:41, "Humberto Carrasco" <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Sergio, > > Thank you for this email. > > I do not live in that part of Chile, but I have family who live if > All. They are thankfully uneventful. > > Greetings > The 02/04 / > On 2/4/2014 1:22 PM, Sergio Salinas Porto wrote: And Javier Humberto >> Dear. Are you and your family well? _______________________________________________ >> Lac-discuss->>'s mailing list Lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> Http://www.lacralo.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > Lac-discuss-en mailing list > Lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > Http://www.lacralo.org _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ff6066763e.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Earthquake in Chile
by vanda＠uol.com.br April 2, 2014

April 2, 2014

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Earthquake in Chile From: vanda(a)uol.com.br Humberto Glad that the population is so well prepared for estes terrible disasters. Hugs Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av Paulista 1159, 1004 cj 01311-200 - Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 On 04/02/14 9:41, "Humberto Carrasco" <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Sergio, > > Thank you for this email. > > I do not live in that part of Chile, but I have family who live if > All. They are thankfully uneventful. > > Greetings > The 02/04 / > On 2/4/2014 1:22 PM, Sergio Salinas Porto wrote: And Javier Humberto >> Dear. Are you and your family well? _______________________________________________ >> Lac-discuss->>'s mailing list Lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> Http://www.lacralo.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > Lac-discuss-en mailing list > Lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > Http://www.lacralo.org _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/4a525c3909.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Earthquake in Chile
by hcarrascob＠gmail.com April 2, 2014

April 2, 2014

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Earthquake in Chile From: hcarrascob(a)gmail.com Sergio, Thank you very much for this email. I do not live in that part of Chile, but I have family who live if there. They are thankfully uneventful. Regards The 02/04 / On 02/04/2014 1:22 pm, Sergio Salinas Porto wrote: > Estimados Humberto y Javier. Estan bien ustedes y su familia? > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c6381727a3.html --]]

2 1

Transferencia de las Funciones de IANA a la Comunidad Global
by Rodrigo de la Parra April 1, 2014

April 1, 2014

Estimados Amigos de LACRALO: Espero que este correo los encuentre muy bien. Como es de su conocimiento el Gobierno de los Estados Unidos de América recientemente anunció su intención de transferir su rol técnico respecto de las funciones de IANA a la comunidad multipartita o multisectorial global de Internet. En 1998, el año en que se forma ICANN, el gobierno de los Estados Unidos determinó que conforme el Internet se expandiera globalmente, su responsabilidad se trasladaría a todos los actores de Internet. Actores que representaran no solo a gobiernos, sino también al sector privado, la sociedad civil, las comunidades técnicas y académicas, así como los usuarios independientes de Internet alrededor del mundo. Desde su formación, ICANN ha cumplido sus obligaciones contractuales al ejecutar estas funciones técnicas y ha alcanzado tanto la excelencia operacional como la madurez organizacional. Ahora, el Gobierno de los Estados Unidos le ha solicitado a ICANN implementar, bajo un enfoque multipartita o multisectorial, la transición de su rol de supervisión iniciando un proceso que permita a la comunidad diseñar un marco incluyente y "de abajo hacia arriba" para tales efectos. Este proceso incluirá oportunidades para la incorporación de insumos, incluyendo tanto aquellos de las organizaciones de soporte y comités asesores activos en ICANN, como aquellos de otros actores interesados. También quisiera aprovechar esta oportunidad para recordarles sobre la resolución que emitió el Directorio de ICANN el 17 de febrero de 2014 para acelerar el proceso de globalización de ICANN. Nuestro equipo se encuentra comprometido para ejecutar este ambicioso plan para implementar este proceso de globalización tan rápido como sea posible para asegurar la inclusion de todos los actores relevantes en todo el mundo. Esta resolución pueden cosultarla aquí: https://www.icann.org/es/groups/board/documents/resolutions-17feb14-es.pdf Su participación es muy importante en este proceso. A continuación te describo una serie de eventos y fechas clave que deben tomar en cuenta: 17 de Marzo de 2014: Publicación del anuncio de ICANN describiendo los principios de relacionamiento con la comunidad y los objetivos de la consulta pública en Singapur. 21 -27 de Marzo de 2014: Durante nuestra reunión 49 en Singapur- Diálogo público y consulta con la comunidad sobre cómo deben ocurrir los mecanismos de la transición. 7 de abril de 2014: Publicación de los resultados de la discusión en Singapur y una propuesta de pasos a seguir y su calendarización. 22 26 de Junio de 2014: Durante nuestra reunión 50 en Londres- reunión de la comunidad global multisectorial para avanzar respecto de lo construido en la reunión previa. 12-16 de Octubre de 2014: Durante nuestra reunión 51 en Los Ángeles- reunión de la comunidad global multisectorial para avanzar respecto de lo construido en las reuniones previas. Marzo de 2015: Durante nuestra reunión 52, lugar por definir- reunión de la comunidad global multisectorial para avanzar respecto de lo construido en las reuniones previas. Junio de 2015: Durante nuestra reunión 53, lugar por definir- reunión de la comunidad global multisectorial para avanzar respecto de lo construido en las reuniones previas. 30 de Septiembre de 2015: Fecha de Vencimiento del Contrato de IANA. Espero contar con su activa participación y apoyo durante este proceso histórico en el desarrollo de Internet. Mucho les agradeceré compartir esta información con sus organizaciones. Para referencia estoy adjuntando un documento sobre Preguntas Frecuentes y otro sobre la Historia y Desarrollo de la Globalización de ICANN. Los documentos en Inglés, Español, Francés y Portugués se encuentran disponibles en nuestra página de Internet. Reciban un afectuoso saludo. -------------------------- Rodrigo de la Parra rodrigo.delaparra(a)icann.org @rdelapar Vicepresidente para América Latina y el Caribe La Casa de Internet de Latinoamérica y el Caribe Rambla República de México 6125 Montevideo, 11400 Uruguay ICANN One World, One Internet

3 2