July 2016 - lac-discuss-en - lists.icann.org

FW: [technical-issues] Nameserver RFC compliance
by Vanda Scartezini July 11, 2016

July 11, 2016

Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. To whom arinterested in technical issues, here some comments from Mark. Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. On 7/5/16, 4:06 AM, "Mark Andrews" <technical-issues-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of marka(a)isc.org> wrote: ICANN currently requires that registries use RFC standards compliant nameservers as part of the registry requirement for non CC TLDs. This covers both DNS (STD 13) and EDNS (RFC6891). This is a good thing and almost all TLD operators are running DNS and EDNS compliant nameservers. https://ednscomp.isc.org/compliance/ts/allok.html https://ednscomp.isc.org/compliance/tld-report.html https://ednscomp.isc.org/compliance/tld-fullreport.txt The same cannot be said of the servers that TLD registries delegate to with just over 50% of servers that are nominally EDNS aware actually being EDNS compliant despite the requirements being nearly 17 years old. This lack of compliance causes operational issues for recursive servers that use the newer features of the DNS and does result in DNS resolution failures. A modern DNS recursive server sends non-recursive EDNS queries with a DNS COOKIE option set and the DO bit set by default to all servers. The typical response profile to this query is shown in these graphs. https://ednscomp.isc.org/compliance/ts/gov.optfail.html https://ednscomp.isc.org/compliance/ts/alexa.optfail.html Similar issues exist when you look at unknown EDNS flag behaviour and unknown EDNS version behavior. These things for the most part are also easy to check for. The EDNS compliance checks performed to generate the pages at https://ednscomp.isc.org are done using these simple DNS queries which target individual EDNS features that should be supported. dig +nocookie +noedns +noad +norec soa -q "$zone" @$server dig +nocookie +edns +noad +norec soa -q "$zone" @$server dig +nocookie +edns=1 +noednsneg +noad +norec soa -q "$zone" @$server dig +nocookie +edns +dnssec +bufsize=512 +noad +norec +ignore dnskey \ -q "$zone" @$server dig +nocookie +ednsopt=100 +noad +norec soa -q "$zone" @$server dig +nocookie +ednsopt=100 +edns=1 +noednsneg +noad +norec soa \ -q "$zone" @$server dig +nocookie +dnssec +noad +norec soa -q "$zone" @$server dig +nocookie +ednsflags=0x80 +noad +norec soa -q "$zone" @$server dig +nocookie +edns +dnssec +bufsize=512 +noad +norec +vc dnskey \ -q "$zone" @$server dig +edns +noad +norec +nsid +subnet=0.0.0.0/0 +expire +cookie \ soa -q "$zone" @$server The errors themselves are trivial to fix in most cases. I fixed similar errors in named back before EDNS was specified and they took less than 5 minutes of coding to fix the errors. Writing the tests took longer. So to with the QA. A more exhaustive list of tests covering STD 13 behaviour as well is in: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-03 We do a disservice to all the recursive server operators and their clients by allowing delegations to non RFC compliant servers to occur. All servers delegated to should be checked at or near initial registration time and the operators informed of errors detected with a request to fix the error and re-checked quarterly if they had a error and annually if they didn't with followups on detected errors. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka(a)isc.org _______________________________________________ Technical-issues mailing list Technical-issues(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/technical-issues

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ECLAC report on Latin America and the Caribbean
by apisan＠unam.mx July 11, 2016

July 11, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: ECLAC report on Latin America and the Caribbean Desde: apisan(a)unam.mx Alberto, this report does not mention ICANN can be positive, not a deficiency; It means that you do not see it as a problematic area in which actors influence the report proposed. The most significant proposal that we must be vigilant, derived from this project ECLAC, is the digital single market for Latin America and the Caribbean. Many of the places where we represent users may be affected, positively or negatively according prove the project work. And, as has happened with other international agreements such as trade agreements, rules for domain names can appear and other regulatory sneak s proposals impinge on the interests of our users. And we have seen in some local legislative attempts, as recent to tax transactions made through the "apps" foreign-born one. LACRALO community is important to know that you. Our elected representatives have both broad vision and focus on the issues of users. Alejandro Pisanty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM University Av 3000,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 +525541444475 SMS FROM MEXICO Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________ From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Alberto Soto [alberto(a)soto.net.ar] Posted on: Friday, July 8, 2016 20:35 To: 'LACRALO Spanish' Subject: [lac-discuss-en] ECLAC report on Latin America and the Caribbean It is a report to read, there are interesting data. There are statistics, various issues, and a little on internet governance, net neutrality, needs about these issues, and on other deficiency in governance, but no one Mencin on ICANN http://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/38604-la-nueva-revolucion-digital-la-… Best regards Alberto Soto ________________________________ [Avast logo] < https://www.avast.com/antivirus> Avast antivirus software has analyzed this electronic mail for viruses. www.avast.com < https://www.avast.com/antivirus> [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/7026dee73e.html --]]

1 0

ECLAC report on Latin America and the Caribbean
by alberto＠soto.net.ar July 11, 2016

July 11, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: ECLAC report on Latin America and the Caribbean Desde: alberto(a)soto.net.ar It is a report to read, there are interesting data. There are statistics, topics varied, and some on internet governance, net neutrality, requirements on these aspects, and on other deficiency in governance, but no one Mencin on ICANN http://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/38604-la-nueva-revolucion-digital-la-i nternet-consumption-the-internet-la-production Best regards Alberto Soto --- Avast antivirus software has analyzed this electronic mail for viruses. https://www.avast.com/antivirus [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f3e37c800e.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ? = Utf-8 q Documentos_ICANN_para_opini = C3 = B3n =
by apisanty＠gmail.com July 10, 2016

July 10, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:? = Utf-8 q Documentos_ICANN_para_opini = C3 = B3n = Desde: apisanty(a)gmail.com Maritza, thank you very much for sending this list of processes that are in stage public comment. In what they are focusing our representatives to ALAC? In which Humberto believe you and that you should try to produce an opinion LACRALO collective? I see some issues remain us away (rules for alphabets You write from right to left, rare in domain names our region so far), others refer to the transition in the IANA supervision, and other topics of general application such as contract .com and the two-letter names in gTLDs, which could have an impact more direct impact on users in the region. What are the priorities of our representatives and officials elected to organize work on policy issues and not organizational? Alejandro Pisanty 07/08/2016 14:46 GMT-05: 00 Maritza Aguero Minano Y. <myaguero(a)msn.com> : > Estimados miembros de LACRALO, > > En el siguiente enlace podrán encontrar los documentos de ICANN que se > encuentran abiertos para comentarios: > https://www.icann.org/public-comments#open-public > > Saludos, > > Maritza > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM University Av 3000,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 +525541444475 SMS FROM MEXICO Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e86ffefbf8.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ECLAC report on Latin America and the Caribbean
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org July 10, 2016

July 10, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: ECLAC report on Latin America and the Caribbean Desde: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org Thanks Fatima excellent contribution. I also believe that at some point there is any contact. For example and talk about IPv6 and Internet of things, how to influence the latter on the use of IP addresses, but does not speak of any coordination with the / the multistakeholders involved in the definition of policies or with those responsible for distribution . It is true that there are layers that correspond only to a certain area and do not go there. Best regards Alberto Soto From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of Antonio Medina Gomez Posted on: Sunday, July 10, 2016 9:24 a.m. To: Aida Noblia <aidanoblia(a)gmail.com> CC: LACRALO Spanish <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] ECLAC report on Latin America and the Caribbean Good morning to all. It is a document that provides knowledge and enriches and complements our work. The 10/7/2016 2:52, "Aida Noblia" <aidanoblia(a)gmail.com <mailto:aidanoblia@gmail.com> > He wrote: Thanks Alberto, it is interesting report brings statistics that can be useful. According to Fatima that the focus is on another layer, but it is also interesting to note that the layers intercontectan .. The report is of an economic commission and may think that focuses the user from their appearance as consumer .. but gives interesting statistics that relate to the right to access and others linked to equity, inclusion and other rights of some of the many stakeholders .. Greetings to all. aída On July 9, 2016, 15:28, Fatima Cambronero <fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com <mailto:fatimacambronero@gmail.com> > He wrote: Alberto, Thanks for sharing this document. It sounds a little logical that no mention of ICANN is not made, being that it was a document that was presented to a Ministerial (= government), in an agency / regional commission of the United Nations, right? Moreover, it is my understanding that this kind of organizations see the user as a consumer rather than as a stakeholder more involved in the discussion / Internet policy development. I do not know how others see it. On the other hand, as also discussed these days in the list, this report focuses primarily on another layer, telecommunications (with other stakeholders involved). Probably read this report will help us as an exercise in boundary layers mainly to understand what our role as users (if they really exist) within ICANN. Only some loose ideas to ponder .... Best regards, Fatima On July 8, 2016, 21:13, Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org <mailto:asoto@ibero-americano.org> > He wrote: It is a report to read, there are interesting data. There are statistics, various issues, and a little on internet governance, net neutrality, you need about these issues, and on other deficiency in governance, but there is no mention about ICANN ... http://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/38604-la-nueva-revolucion-digital-la-… Best regards Alberto Soto _____ < https://www.avast.com/antivirus> Avast antivirus software scanned this email for viruses. www.avast.com < https://www.avast.com/antivirus> _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/12482da8c8.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ECLAC report on Latin America and the Caribbean
by amedinagomez＠gmail.com July 10, 2016

July 10, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: ECLAC report on Latin America and the Caribbean Desde: amedinagomez(a)gmail.com Good morning to all. It is a document that provides knowledge and enriches and complements our work. The 10/7/2016 2:52, "Aida Noblia" <aidanoblia(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Gracias Alberto, es interesante el informe, trae estadísticas que pueden > ser útiles. De acuerdo con Fátima que el enfoque es en otra capa, pero > también es interesante tener en cuenta que las capas se intercontectan.. El > informe es de una comisión económica y puede pensarse que enfoca al > usuario desde su aspecto en cuanto consumidor .. pero da estadisticas > interesantes que se relacionan con el derecho de acceso y otros vinculados > a equidad, inclusión y otros derechos de algunas de las múltiples partes > interesadas.. > > Saludos a todos. > Aída > > El 9 de julio de 2016, 15:28, Fatima Cambronero < > fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com> escribió: > >> Alberto, >> >> Gracias por compartir este documento. >> >> Suena un poco lógico que no se haga ninguna mención a ICANN, siendo que >> fue un documento que se presentó para una Ministerial (=gobiernos), en un >> organismo/comisión regional de las Naciones Unidas, verdad? >> >> Por otra parte, es mi entendimiento que esta clase de organismos ven al >> usuario como consumidor y no como un stakeholder más involucrado en la >> discusión/elaboración de políticas de Internet. No sé cómo lo vean los >> demás. >> >> Y por otra parte, como también se habló estos días en la lista, este >> reporte se enfoca principalmente en otra capa, en las telecomunicaciones >> (con otros stakeholders involucrados). >> >> Probablemente leer este reporte nos sirva como ejercicio de deslinde de >> capas principalmente para entender cuál es nuestro rol como usuarios (si es >> que realmente existe) dentro de ICANN. >> >> Sólo algunas ideas sueltas para reflexionar.... >> >> Saludos cordiales, >> Fatima >> >> >> >> El 8 de julio de 2016, 21:13, Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> >> escribió: >> >>> Es un informe para leer, hay datos interesantes. Hay estadísticas, temas >>> variados, y un poco sobre gobernanza de internet, neutralidad de la red, >>> necesidades sobre esos aspectos, y deficiencia sobre otros en la >>> gobernanza, pero no hay una sola mención sobre ICANN… >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> http://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/38604-la-nueva-revolucion-digital-la-… >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Saludos cordiales >>> >>> >>> >>> Alberto Soto >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >>> >>> El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en >>> busca de virus. >>> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> lac-discuss-es mailing list >>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >>> >>> http://www.lacralo.org >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> *Fatima Cambronero* >> Abogada >> Argentina/México >> >> Phone: Argentina: +54 9351 5282 668 - México: +52 (55) 3018 2066 >> Twitter: @facambronero >> Skype: fatima.cambronero >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lac-discuss-es mailing list >> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> >> http://www.lacralo.org >> > > > > -- > Aida Noblia > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/336716a5ef.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ECLAC report on Latin America and the Caribbean
by aidanoblia＠gmail.com July 10, 2016

July 10, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: ECLAC report on Latin America and the Caribbean Desde: aidanoblia(a)gmail.com Thanks Alberto, it is interesting report brings statistics can be useful. According to Fatima that the focus is on another layer, but is also interesting to note that the layers intercontectan .. The report is an economic commission and may think that focuses on user since its appearance as a consumer .. but it gives statistics interesting that they relate to the right of access and other related to equity, inclusion and other rights of some of the multiple parts interested .. Greetings to all. aída On July 9, 2016, 15:28, Fatima Cambronero <fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Alberto, > > Gracias por compartir este documento. > > Suena un poco lÃ³gico que no se haga ninguna menciÃ³n a ICANN, siendo que > fue un documento que se presentÃ³ para una Ministerial (=gobiernos), en un > organismo/comisiÃ³n regional de las Naciones Unidas, verdad? > > Por otra parte, es mi entendimiento que esta clase de organismos ven al > usuario como consumidor y no como un stakeholder mÃ¡s involucrado en la > discusiÃ³n/elaboraciÃ³n de polÃticas de Internet. No sÃ© cÃ³mo lo vean los > demÃ¡s. > > Y por otra parte, como tambiÃ©n se hablÃ³ estos dÃas en la lista, este > reporte se enfoca principalmente en otra capa, en las telecomunicaciones > (con otros stakeholders involucrados). > > Probablemente leer este reporte nos sirva como ejercicio de deslinde de > capas principalmente para entender cuÃ¡l es nuestro rol como usuarios (si es > que realmente existe) dentro de ICANN. > > SÃ³lo algunas ideas sueltas para reflexionar.... > > Saludos cordiales, > Fatima > > > > El 8 de julio de 2016, 21:13, Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> > escribiÃ³: > >> Es un informe para leer, hay datos interesantes. Hay estadÃsticas, temas >> variados, y un poco sobre gobernanza de internet, neutralidad de la red, >> necesidades sobre esos aspectos, y deficiencia sobre otros en la >> gobernanza, pero no hay una sola menciÃ³n sobre ICANNâŠ >> >> >> >> >> http://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/38604-la-nueva-revolucion-digital-la-… >> >> >> >> >> >> Saludos cordiales >> >> >> >> Alberto Soto >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >> >> El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrÃ³nico en >> busca de virus. >> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lac-discuss-es mailing list >> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> >> http://www.lacralo.org >> > > > > -- > *Fatima Cambronero* > Abogada > Argentina/MÃ©xico > > Phone: Argentina: +54 9351 5282 668 - MÃ©xico: +52 (55) 3018 2066 > Twitter: @facambronero > Skype: fatima.cambronero > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > Aida Noblia [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/352ad329d0.html --]]

1 0

= utf-8 b cHBtIFhNTC4gw7E = =?
by amedinagomez＠gmail.com July 9, 2016

July 9, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: = utf-8 b cHBtIFhNTC4gw7E = =? Desde: amedinagomez(a)gmail.com uln or uln llll llll ygy8z Yiseth [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/79499f6250.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ECLAC report on Latin America and the Caribbean
by fatimacambronero＠gmail.com July 9, 2016

July 9, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: ECLAC report on Latin America and the Caribbean Desde: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com Alberto, Thanks for sharing this document. It sounds a little logical that no mention of ICANN is not made, being it was a document that was presented to a Ministerial (= government), in a body / regional commission of the United Nations, right? Moreover, it is my understanding that this kind of agencies see the user as a consumer and not a stakeholder more involved in the discussion / Internet policy development. I do not know how they see the the rest. On the other hand, as also discussed these days in the list, this report primarily focuses on another layer, telecommunications (With other stakeholders involved). We probably read this report serves as a demarcation exercise of mainly layers to understand what our role as users (if really it exists) within ICANN. Only some loose ideas to ponder .... Best regards, Fatima On July 8, 2016, 21:13, Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> wrote: > Es un informe para leer, hay datos interesantes. Hay estadísticas, temas > variados, y un poco sobre gobernanza de internet, neutralidad de la red, > necesidades sobre esos aspectos, y deficiencia sobre otros en la > gobernanza, pero no hay una sola mención sobre ICANN… > > > > > http://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/38604-la-nueva-revolucion-digital-la-… > > > > > > Saludos cordiales > > > > Alberto Soto > > > ------------------------------ > [image: Avast logo] <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> > > El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en > busca de virus. > www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > * Fatima Cambronero * A lawyer Argentina / Mexico Phone: Argentina: +54 9351 5282 668 - Mexico: +52 (55) 3018 2066 Twitter: @facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/7dc29f027d.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ? = Iso-8859-1 Sesi q = F3n_Informativa_Grupos_de_Tr = = iso-8859-1 down q =????
by vanda＠scartezini.org July 9, 2016

July 9, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:? = Iso-8859-1 Sesi q = F3n_Informativa_Grupos_de_Tr = = iso-8859-1 down q =???? Desde: vanda(a)scartezini.org hello Rodrigo Let's have a session of IGF BRAZIL read out in the near Tuesday afternoon. Daniel has the information. Todavaan I'm not in Brazil but will be in Porto Alegre for the read out Hugs Vanda Scartezini Sent from my iPhone Sorry for typos On July 8, 2016, at 21:38, Rodrigo Saucedo <rodrigo.saucedo(a)icann.org<mailto:rodrigo.saucedo@icann.org> > Wrote: Dear members of LACRALO, I inform you that on wednesday July 13 at 16:00 UTC, will carry out the informative session on the issue of incorporacina Working Groups for Implementacin phase of Transition IANA and accountability of ICANN, which arose to raz the call for volunteers by Lito Ibarra. To enter the session: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/lacteam The audio of the room to be in Spanish. Audio in English: EN: 9001 Adigo numbers: http://adigo.com/icann/ Diary: - Welcome - Rodrigo de la Parra - Context of the transition of IANA and ICANN accountability - Rodrigo de la Parra - Description of the purpose of the session - Lito Ibarra - General requirements for the Working Groups - Lito Ibarra - Description of the working groups - Len Sanchez - Next Steps - Lito Ibarra Regards, -------------------------- Rodrigo Saucedo rodrigo.saucedo(a)icann.org <mailto:rodrigo.delaparra@icann.org> Project Manager, Latin America and the Caribbean ICANN One World, One Internet [Cid: 51AF6EE2-121A-4A40-9D4A-4190AF21C755] <10FB7631-6B8A-4606-AA4C-DE4125B0A2F3 [3] .png> _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/46657da0d6.html --]]

1 0