March 2017 - lac-discuss-en

Meeting Invitation / At-Large Capacity Building Program 2017: " At-Large Policy Advice Development process"
by myaguero＠msn.com March 24, 2017

March 24, 2017

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Meeting Invitation / At-Large Capacity Building Program 2017: "At-Large Policy Advice Development process" Desde: myaguero(a)msn.com Dear all, For Those Who Might be interested in participating. Regards, Maritza ________________________________ From: alac-announce-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <alac-announce-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Posted: Friday, March 24, 2017 7:24 a.m. To: ALAC Announce; Elizabeth Andrews Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff Subject: [ALAC-Announce] REMINDER: Meeting Invitation / At-Large Capacity Building Program 2017: "At-Large Policy Advice Development process" If you require a dial-out Please contact At-Large staff at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <file://composeviewinternalloadurl/staff@atlarge.icann.org> With your preferred number. Please Remember That it is now possible to connect your audio via the AC room, without using your telephone. You need a stable internet connection. If you would like a reminder of how to connect please let staff know. If you need a call to your phone, please contact p ngase staff At-Large staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <file://composeviewinternalloadurl/staff@atlarge.icann.org> with n I simply preferred. Please remember that you can connect the audio to trav s of Adobe Connect, without using your phone tel. na stable internet connection one is needed. If you want a reminder of c mo connect please let staff know. If vous avez besoin d'un dial-out, merci de le personnel au communiquer At-Large staff(a)atlarge.icann.org avec votre appel d'num ro pr fr. Nous vous que vous pouvez d Rappelons sormais utiliser l'l'audio Adobe Connect room afin de vous connecter ligne sans utiliser votre tl phonique. Il vous faut une connexion stable internet. Merci nous confirmer votre participation et dial-out - if n cessaire - ainsi que votre num ro: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <file://composeviewinternalloadurl/staff@atlarge.icann.org> Dear All, On Behalf of Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Capacity Building Working Group, we would like to invite you to join the second Webinar of the new At-Large Capacity Building Program 2017 on the Topic of At-Large advice Policy development process. The trainers will be Ariel Liang < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_profiles…>, Policy Analyst and Alan Greenberg < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_di…>, The webinar is scheduled on Tuesday, 28 March 2017 from 13: 00-14: 30 UTC (90 minutes). For other times: < https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tinyurl.com_kyun85o&d=…> https://tinyurl.com/kyun85o The draft schedule and call details are available at: < https://community.icann.org/x/Cb3RAw> https://community.icann.org/x/Cb3RAw French and Spanish interpretation will be provided. Adobe Connect: < https://participate.icann.org/alcb2017/> https://participate.icann.org/alcb2017/ S Conference ID: EN: 1638 EN: 1738 FR: 1838 If you require a dial-out, At-Large Please contact staff at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> With your preferred number. Thank you. Kind Regards, ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Website: < https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: < https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> facebook.com/icann <facebook.com/icannatlarge> < https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> @ <@ ICANNAtLarge> < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<@ICANNAtLarge> [Unknown.png] [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/8017ce9b9f.html --]]

1 0

Meeting Invitation / At-Large Capacity Building Program 2017: "At-Large Policy advice development process"
by Maritza Y. Aguero Minano March 24, 2017

March 24, 2017

Dear all, For those who might be interested in participating. Regards, Maritza ________________________________ De: alac-announce-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <alac-announce-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> en nombre de ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Enviado: viernes, 24 de marzo de 2017 07:24 a. m. Para: ALAC Announce; Elizabeth Andrews Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff Asunto: [ALAC-Announce] REMINDER: Meeting Invitation / At-Large Capacity Building Program 2017: "At-Large Policy advice development process" If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<file://composeviewinternalloadurl/staff@atlarge.icann.org> with your preferred number. Please remember that it is now possible to connect your audio via the AC room, without using your telephone. You need a stable internet connection. If you would like a reminder of how to connect please let staff know. Si necesita una llamada a su telefono, por favor póngase en contacto con el personal de At-Large en staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<file://composeviewinternalloadurl/staff@atlarge.icann.org> con su número preferido. Por favor, recuerde que es posible conectar el audio a través de la Adobe Connect , sin necesidad de utilizar su teléfono. Se necesita una conexión a Internet estable . Si desea un recordatorio de cómo conectar por favor que el personal sepa. Si vous avez besoin d'un dial-out, merci de le communiquer au personnel At-Large à staff(a)atlarge.icann.org avec votre numéro d'appel préféré. Nous vous rappelons que vous pouvez désormais utiliser l'audio de l'Adobe Connect room afin de vous connecter sans utiliser votre ligne téléphonique. Il vous faut une connexion internet stable. Merci de nous confirmer votre participation et dial-out - si nécessaire - ainsi que votre numéro à: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<file://composeviewinternalloadurl/staff@atlarge.icann.org> Dear All, On behalf of Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Capacity Building Working Group, we would like to invite you to join the second Webinar of the new At-Large Capacity Building Program – 2017 on the Topic of “At-Large Policy advice development process”. The trainers will be Ariel Liang<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_profiles…>, Policy Analyst and Alan Greenberg<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_di…>, Chair of the ALAC. The webinar is scheduled on Tuesday, 28 March 2017 from 13:00-14:30 UTC (90 minutes). For other times: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tinyurl.com_kyun85o&d=…> https://tinyurl.com/kyun85o The draft agenda and call details are available at: <https://community.icann.org/x/Cb3RAw> https://community.icann.org/x/Cb3RAw French and Spanish interpretation will be provided. Adobe Connect: <https://participate.icann.org/alcb2017/> https://participate.icann.org/alcb2017/ Conference ID’s: EN:1638 ES: 1738 FR: 1838 If you require a dial-out, please contact At-Large staff at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> with your preferred number. Thank you. Kind Regards, ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Website: <https://atlarge.icann.org/> atlarge.icann.org Facebook: <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> facebook.com/icann<facebook.com/icannatlarge><https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> @<@ICANNAtLarge><https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<@ICANNAtLarge> [unknown.png]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ??????? Q = iso-8859-1 FAblico_24 Cerraerdo_comentario_p = = = iso-8859-1 -MAR-17_de q =
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org March 24, 2017

March 24, 2017

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:??????? Q = iso-8859-1 FAblico_24 Cerraerdo_comentario_p = = = iso-8859-1 -MAR-17_de q = Desde: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org Dear Olivier, thank you again. LACRALO struggled to leave their comment on these forms, and apparently there were several with the same problem. Envi ended imagine Harold Ndolo mail. I also n I using that to v. I called the care that on an issue like this, this process is used: fixed form (with problems) and mail. And the p PUBLIC commenting does not have access to other comments, nor made in the form or mailed It's very weird.... Best regards Alberto Soto -----Original message----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] On behalf of ocl(a)gih.com Posted on: Thursday, March 23, 2017 7:38 a.m. To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: Closed comment p PUBLIC 24-MAR-17 [[Translated text (in -> en) -]] Subject: Re: Closed comment p PUBLIC 24-MAR-17 From: ocl(a)gih.com Dear Alberto, ALS and At-Large members are Alent to respond directly to the consultation by electronic mail to: comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17(a)icann.org L date limit for direct comments on March 24, 2017 23:59 GMT But the ALAC and RALO leaders l n prepar also obtained comments Consensus discussions. Drafts of these comments have been And circulated. The comment THIN taken directly input all particularly the work of the working group and can LACRALO RALOS found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DZLG-xM-WbyhI9LqAkS3pGZwvDjBI10h0xxYp5Ch OPA / edit? Usp = sharing The Declaration by ALAC \\ u200b \\ is elabor u200bcon several applications input community and its last draft is attached. I understand that now both states is frozen n - that is completed, unless someone wing a factual error. ALS are encouraged to support the ALAC and RALO statements, but Tambi n are encouraged to comment directly at the email above, using or not using the template. Best regards, Olivier On 23/03/2017 2:09, asoto(a)ibero-americano.org wrote: > Estimates, as everyone knows, on 24 March 2017, close the > comments p venues around the reviewedSeptember n At-Large ITEMS by the > > > There were two papers entries, the first draft pages and ninety p > then containing the recommendations is sixteen. > > > The view favored this latter, it is obviously very limited without power > review the first draft. > > > Since the beginning many members of the WG, we made observations on > that draft, which served to comment on the document > contains recommendations is sixteen. > > > > > > > LACRALO har its inset n on these recommendations, according to what is > They come off the WG, and were informed promptly to the list. > > > > > > > As recommended that each ALS or ALS pour each member of your > OPINION n in the commentary p PUBLIC few minutes ago I tried. Actually > Be prepared to personal comments on both documents. > > > > > > > My surprise when entering the link was that can only opinarse to a trav s > form the view favored only limited to comments, and restricted to a > format for review comment for comment. > > > > > > > This means that the initial draft document, which I believe contains > several shortcomings and misguided claims not directly investigated > in fact, it is not feasible to be observed or can be poured VIEW n > on it. > > > > > > > We must remember that ning n p PUBLIC comment was restricted to a > form, and less an no possibility of opinion on the document > He gave rise to that form. > > > > > > > Unfortunately it is too late, this PERIOD already closed.Try the way > making a general comment, not particularly about each > RECOMMENDATION No, because I think it is an important limitation n our > freedom of opinion. > > > > > > > The link in question: > < > lic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf> > > ic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf > > > > > > > > http://www.gih.com/ocl.html [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/9611c6d953.html --]]

1 0

REMINDER: Meeting Invitation / At-Large Capacity Building Program 2017: "At-Large Policy advice development process"
by ICANN At-Large Staff March 24, 2017

March 24, 2017

If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<file://composeviewinternalloadurl/staff@atlarge.icann.org> with your preferred number. Please remember that it is now possible to connect your audio via the AC room, without using your telephone. You need a stable internet connection. If you would like a reminder of how to connect please let staff know. Si necesita una llamada a su telefono, por favor póngase en contacto con el personal de At-Large en staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<file://composeviewinternalloadurl/staff@atlarge.icann.org> con su número preferido. Por favor, recuerde que es posible conectar el audio a través de la Adobe Connect , sin necesidad de utilizar su teléfono. Se necesita una conexión a Internet estable . Si desea un recordatorio de cómo conectar por favor que el personal sepa. Si vous avez besoin d'un dial-out, merci de le communiquer au personnel At-Large à staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> avec votre numéro d'appel préféré. Nous vous rappelons que vous pouvez désormais utiliser l'audio de l'Adobe Connect room afin de vous connecter sans utiliser votre ligne téléphonique. Il vous faut une connexion internet stable. Merci de nous confirmer votre participation et dial-out - si nécessaire - ainsi que votre numéro à: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<file://composeviewinternalloadurl/staff@atlarge.icann.org> Dear All, On behalf of Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Capacity Building Working Group, we would like to invite you to join the second Webinar of the new At-Large Capacity Building Program - 2017 on the Topic of "At-Large Policy advice development process". The trainers will be Ariel Liang<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_profiles…>, Policy Analyst and Alan Greenberg<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_di…>, Chair of the ALAC. The webinar is scheduled on Tuesday, 28 March 2017 from 13:00-14:30 UTC (90 minutes). For other times: <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tinyurl.com_kyun85o&d=…> https://tinyurl.com/kyun85o The draft agenda and call details are available at: <https://community.icann.org/x/Cb3RAw> https://community.icann.org/x/Cb3RAw French and Spanish interpretation will be provided. Adobe Connect: <https://participate.icann.org/alcb2017/> https://participate.icann.org/alcb2017/ Conference ID's: EN:1638 ES: 1738 FR: 1838 If you require a dial-out, please contact At-Large staff at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> with your preferred number. Thank you. Kind Regards, ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Website: <https://atlarge.icann.org/> atlarge.icann.org Facebook: <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> facebook.com/icann<facebook.com/icannatlarge><https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> @<@ICANNAtLarge><https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<@ICANNAtLarge> [unknown.png]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Public comment closes 24 MAR 17
by aidanoblia＠gmail.com March 23, 2017

March 23, 2017

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Public comment closes 24 MAR 17 Desde: aidanoblia(a)gmail.com A clear Alberto, sorry, yes I agree, I had not understood then explained to me or not, it is very true that you did not respond and I agree that there is no justification for the change of model .. regards On March 23, 2017, 10:06 am, Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> wrote: > Estimada Aida, he participado de TODAS las reuniones del Working Party, > como miembro participante sin derecho a voto, así que conozco todos los > detalles. > > Lo que quiero recalcar, es que la consultora ITEMS no ha respondido a > ninguna de las preguntas que justifiquen e cambio de modelo. > > Saludos > > Alberto > > > > *De:* Aida Noblia [mailto:aidanoblia@gmail.com] > *Enviado el:* Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:34 AM > > *Para:* Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> > *CC:* Alexis Anteliz <antelizalexis(a)gmail.com>; LACRALO < > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > *Asunto:* Re: [lac-discuss-es] Comentario publico cierra 24 MAR 17 > > > > Alberto, esos comentarios que están en las direcciones que te envié están > puestos desde hace tiempo. El Working Party viene trabajando desde hace > meses.. > > Respecto a las 50 ALs, yo también espero que puedan poner comentario otras > ALs. . Estoy de acuerdo con tu llamado a las ALSes y es necesario que > urgentemente se manifiesten. > > > > Saludos > > > > El 22 de marzo de 2017, 23:05, Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> > escribió: > > Muchas gracias Aida, esto solo refuerza mis comentarios, solo espero > comentarios de 50 ALSs de nuestra Región, . > > Sugiero a todo LACRALO verificar las respuestas y realizar el conteo > final, con descripción de todas nuestras organizaciones que respondieron y > cuáles no. Para ello, sugiero que puedan responder nuestras cincuenta > organizaciones, hasta el vencimiento del comentario público. > > > > Alberto Soto > > > > > > > > > > *De:* Aida Noblia [mailto:aidanoblia@gmail.com] > *Enviado el:* Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:44 PM > *Para:* Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> > *CC:* Alexis Anteliz <antelizalexis(a)gmail.com>; LACRALO < > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > *Asunto:* Re: [lac-discuss-es] Comentario publico cierra 24 MAR 17 > > > > En la siguiente dirección hay un espacio para comentarios más amplios: > > > > https://community.icann.org/display/ALRW/Review+of+the+ > ICANN+At-Large+Community+-+Draft+Report+for+Public+ > Comment?focusedCommentId=64067053&#comment-64067053 > > > > Aquí hay una lista donde también se puso un comentario por no poder > ponerlo en el template. > > https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atlarge-review-draft- > report-01feb17/msg00006.html > > > > Yo intenté poner mis comentarios en el template pero es demasiado poco > amigable, además de restringido a comentar solo las recomendaciones . Es > bien difícil poder terminarlo..No se puede copiar y pegar comentarios > originariamente escritos en algún otro archivo, la letra y el espacio son > muy acotado > > > > Lamento la hora pero tenía otra reunión de mi ALS y salí hace unos minutos > > Saludos > > > > El 22 de marzo de 2017, 22:24, <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> escribió: > > Así es Alexis. Si no opinamos en este momento, seremos responsables de las > consecuencias de este proceso. Y lo peor, no tendremos derecho a reclamar. > > Saludos!! > > > > Alberto Soto > > Enviado desde mi iPhone > > > El 22 mar. 2017, a las 22:20, Alexis Anteliz <antelizalexis(a)gmail.com> > escribió: > > Muchas gracias Alberto en ICANN58 presencié ambos momentos, creo es justo > y necesario ampliar, mejorar y sobre todo perfilar el rol de ambas > instancias de cara a los usuarios. Es imperativo se conozcan los planes, > programas, acciones, resultados. Es decir, optimizar los mecanismos que > garanticen la efectiva y activa participación de ambas instancias. Que bien > pueden ser complementarias y no necesariamente excluyentes. Saludos Alexis > Anteliz / fellowship > > Estimados, como todos saben, el 24 de marzo de 2017, se cierran los > comentarios públicos de la Revisión At-Large realizada por la empresa ITEMS. > > Hubo dos documentos de ITEMS, el primero un borrador de noventa páginas y > luego el que contiene las dieciséis recomendaciones. > > La opinión sobre este último, resulta evidentemente muy limitada sin > poder opinar sobre el primer borrador. > > Desde el inicio muchos integrantes del WG , realizamos observaciones sobre > ese borrador, que sirvieron para realizar comentarios sobre el documento > que contiene las dieciséis recomendaciones. > > > > LACRALO hará su inserción sobre estas recomendaciones, según se > desprendieron del WG, y oportunamente fueron informadas a la lista. > > > > Como se recomendara que cada ALS o cada integrante de ALS vertiera su > opinión en el comentario público, hace pocos minutos lo intenté. En > realidad tenía preparado comentarios personales sobre ambos documentos. > > > > Mi sorpresa al ingresar al link, fue que solo puede opinarse a través de > un formulario que “limita” la opinión solo a los comentarios, y restringe a > un formato para opinar comentario por comentario. > > > > Esto significa que el documento borrador inicial, que a mi juicio contiene > varias deficiencias y aseveraciones equivocadas no investigadas > directamente en los hechos, no es factible de ser observado ni puede > verterse opinión sobre el mismo. > > > > Debemos recordar que ningún comentario público estuvo restringido a un > formulario, y menos aún sin posibilidad de opinión sobre el documento que > dio origen a ese formulario. > > > > Lamentablemente es muy tarde, este período ya se cierra. Intentaré la > forma de realizar un comentario general, no particularmente sobre cada > recomendación, porque considero que es una limitación importante a nuestra > libertad de opinión. > > > > El link en cuestión: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge- > review-draft-report-public-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf > > > > > > Saludos cordiales > > > > Alberto Soto > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > > > > > > -- > > Aida Noblia > > > > > > -- > > Aida Noblia > Aida Noblia [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/16a4a50eb4.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ??????? = Utf-8 Respuesta_de_las_RALOs_al_informe_de_r q = q = utf-8 evisi = C3 = B3n_de_At-Large =
by hcarrasco＠cmsz.cl March 23, 2017

March 23, 2017

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:??????? = Utf-8 Respuesta_de_las_RALOs_al_informe_de_r q = q = utf-8 evisi = C3 = B3n_de_At-Large = Desde: hcarrasco(a)cmsz.cl Dear Ricardo, Very thoughtful feedback. Indeed, the board and it took note of this review and apparently future revisions will be made differently. regards Sent from my iPhone > El 23-03-2017, a las 15:46, Ricardo Holmquist <rihogris(a)gmail.com> escribió: > > Estimado Humberto, > creo que el documento de respuesta esta muy bien, mis felicitaciones al WG que trabajo en ello. > > El mismo recoge la mayor parte de mis inquietudes, una vez que la revisión efectuada por ITEMS parece esta estar demasiado des balanceada a favor de los pocos usuarios individuales que se quejan por que no pertenecen a una ALS y prefieren actuar solos que a través de una organización. > > Mas que una serie de conclusiones erradas y unas recomendaciones aun peores, me preocupa el hecho de que esta es una revisión de lo que hacemos, y que posiblemente pase con el resto de las revisiones a otras organizaciones. En promedio las SO y AC se deben revisar cada tres años a todas. Si en cada una de ellas el resultado es el que vemos, lejos de avanzar en nuestro trabajo y obtener recomendaciones que nos permitan ir dando saltos de calidad, lo que tenemos que hacer es perder tres meses en defendernos. Para mi eso no tiene sentido. > > Creo seria pertinente revisar con el staff de ICANN la cualificaciones solicitadas para los revisores. > > Saludos cordiales > > Ricardo Holmquist > > ISOC Venezuela > > El 22 de marzo de 2017, 21:36, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> escribió: >> Estimados, >> >> Este es el link de la respuesta de todas las RALOs (incluido el trabajo hecho en LACRALO) al informe que realizó respecto de At-Large.. >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DZLG-xM-WbyhI9LqAkS3pGZwvDjBI10h0xxYp5C… >> >> >> He solicitado la traducción de este documento a los idiomas de la región para someterlo a ratificación de los miembros de la región. Lamentablemente, atendido a la brevedad de los plazos, no fue posible hacer una votación previa. Es por esta razón, que una vez que tengamos las traducciones respectivas, lo someteremos a ratificación por consenso o votación. >> >> Saludos >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lac-discuss-es mailing list >> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> >> http://www.lacralo.org > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/52d5abc3cd.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ??????? = Utf-8 Respuesta_de_las_RALOs_al_informe_de_r q = q = utf-8 evisi = C3 = B3n_de_At-Large =
by rihogris＠gmail.com March 23, 2017

March 23, 2017

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:??????? = Utf-8 Respuesta_de_las_RALOs_al_informe_de_r q = q = utf-8 evisi = C3 = B3n_de_At-Large = Desde: rihogris(a)gmail.com Dear Humberto, I think the response document this very well, my congratulations to WG I work on it. It gathers most of my concerns, once the review ITEMS effected by this seems to be too balanced for des the few individual users who complain because they do not belong to a ALS and prefer to act alone through an organization. But a series of wrong conclusions and its recommendations even worse, worried about the fact that this is a review of what we do, and possibly through the rest of the revisions to other organizations. On average AC SO and should be checked every three years all.If each result is what we see, far from advance our work and get recommendations that allow us to jumping quality, we have to do is lose three months defend ourselves. To me that makes no sense. I would check with relevant ICANN staff's qualifications requested for reviewers. Best regards Ricardo Holmquist ISOC Venezuela On 22 March 2017, 21:36, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Estimados, > > Este es el link de la respuesta de todas las RALOs (incluido el trabajo > hecho en LACRALO) al informe que realizó respecto de At-Large.. > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DZLG-xM-WbyhI9LqAkS3pGZw > vDjBI10h0xxYp5ChOPA/edit?usp=sharing > > > He solicitado la traducción de este documento a los idiomas de la región > para someterlo a ratificación de los miembros de la región. > Lamentablemente, atendido a la brevedad de los plazos, no fue posible hacer > una votación previa. Es por esta razón, que una vez que tengamos las > traducciones respectivas, lo someteremos a ratificación por consenso o > votación. > > Saludos > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e2de676dc9.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ?????? = Utf-8 q Respuesta_de_RALOS_a_la_revisi = C3 = B3n _ = = utf-8 q-Large de_at =?
by harold.arcos＠gmail.com March 23, 2017

March 23, 2017

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:?????? = Utf-8 q Respuesta_de_RALOS_a_la_revisi = C3 = B3n _ = = utf-8 q-Large de_at =? Desde: harold.arcos(a)gmail.com Dear good day LACNIC activities #OnTheMove yesterday ended long before power consult a change in the agenda. I take the opportunity to remind everyone who has comments and comments on the recommendations of items can express them in space Public Comment arranged for it in https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-pub… fraternal greetings Sorry for typos and brevity / Sorry errors and brevity in the use of this dispositivo.a The 22/03/2017 22:22 "Alexis Anteliz" <antelizalexis(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Gracias Humberto, sugiero modestamente, si aún hay tiempo se aproveche el > espacio #TheOnMove en Guatemala, donde estuvo o está aún el compañero > Harold Arcos para que este documento sea socializado, entre otros con el > recien creado capítulo ISOC GUATEMALA. Es parte de la labor que debemos > hacer de cara a los usuarios. Máxime cuándo la misión incluye promover los > medios de participación de los usuarios de Internet en AtLarge > concretamente en LACRALO. Saludos. Alexis Anteliz / Newcomer-Fellowship > ICANN58 > El mar 22, 2017 10:13 p. m., <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> escribió: > >> >> [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] >> >> Asunto: Respuesta de RALOS a la revisión de At-Large >> De: hcarrascob(a)gmail.com >> >> Queridos todos, >> >> >> En este enlace encontrará la respuesta de todos los ralos (incluyendo el >> trabajo >> realizado por LACRALO) al informe que escribieron ARTÍCULOS respecto de >> alcance. >> >> >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DZLG-xM-WbyhI9LqAkS3pGZw >> vDjBI10h0xxYp5ChOPA / editar? USP = compartir >> >> >> >> >> >> >> He pedido a la traducción de este documento en los idiomas de la >> región a la ratificación de los miembros de la región. Lamentablemente, >> debido a las >> la brevedad de los plazos, no fue posible hacer una previa >> votar. Es por esta razón, que una vez que tengamos las traducciones >> respectivas, >> vamos a presentar este documento a la ratificación por consenso o por >> votación. >> >> >> Saludos >> >> >> [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0405cd6d36.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Public comment closes 24 MAR 17
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org March 23, 2017

March 23, 2017

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Public comment closes 24 MAR 17 Desde: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org Dear Aida, I participated in all meetings of the Working Party as a participating member without voting rights, so I know all the details. I want to emphasize is that the consultant ITEMS has not responded to any of the questions that justify and model change. regards Alberto From: Aida Noblia [mailto: aidanoblia(a)gmail.com] Posted on: Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:34 AM To: Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> CC: Alexis Anteliz <antelizalexis(a)gmail.com> ; LACRALO <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: [lac-discuss-en] public comment closes 24 MAR 17 Alberto, these comments are in the directions I sent you are set for some time. The Working Party has been working for months .. Regarding the 50 ALs, I also hope you can put other ALs comment. . I agree with your call to ALSes and urgently need to manifest. regards On 22 March 2017, 23:05, Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org <mailto:asoto@ibero-americano.org> > He wrote: Thank you very much Aida, this only reinforces my comments, I just hope comments 50 ALSes of our region. I suggest all LACRALO verify the answers and make the final count, with descriptions of all our organizations that responded and what not. To do this, I suggest you can answer our fifty organizations, until the expiration of public comment. Alberto Soto From: Aida Noblia [mailto: aidanoblia(a)gmail.com <mailto:aidanoblia@gmail.com> ] Posted on: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:44 PM To: Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org <mailto:asoto@ibero-americano.org> > CC: Alexis Anteliz <antelizalexis(a)gmail.com <mailto:antelizalexis@gmail.com> >; LACRALO <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> > Subject: [lac-discuss-en] public comment closes 24 MAR 17 At the following address there is a space for wider comments: https://community.icann.org/display/ALRW/Review+of+the+ICANN+At-Large+Commu… < https://community.icann.org/display/ALRW/Review+of+the+ICANN+At-Large+Commu…> Here is a list which also put a comment about not being able to put it in the template. https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atlarge-review-draft-report-01feb17/… I tried to put my comments in the template but it's too little, plus restricted only friendly to comment on the recommendations.It is very difficult to terminarlo..No can copy and paste originally written comments in another file, the letter and space are very limited I regret the time but had another meeting my ALS and left a few minutes ago regards On 22 March 2017, 22:24, <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org <mailto:asoto@ibero-americano.org> > He wrote: Here's Alexis. If not our view at this time, we will be responsible for the consequences of this process. And worse, we have no right to claim. Regards!! Alberto Soto Sent from my iPhone 22 sea. 2017, at 22:20, Alexis Anteliz <antelizalexis(a)gmail.com <mailto:antelizalexis@gmail.com> > He wrote: Thank you very much Alberto in ICANN58 I witnessed both times, I think it is fair and necessary to expand, improve and above all outline the role of both instances users face.It is imperative plans, programs, actions, results are known. Ie optimize the mechanisms to ensure effective and active participation of both instances. That may well be complementary and not necessarily mutually exclusive. Greetings Alexis Anteliz / fellowship Estimates, as everyone knows, on 24 March 2017, public comments from the At-Large Review by the company ITEMS close. There were two papers entries, the first draft and then ninety pages containing the sixteen recommendations. The opinion on the latter, it is obviously very limited unable to comment on the first draft. Since the beginning many members of the WG, we made comments on the draft, which served to comment on the document containing the sixteen recommendations. LACRALO will be inserted on these recommendations, as they came off the WG, and were informed promptly to the list. As recommended that each ALS or ALS pour each member of your opinion of public comment, I tried a few minutes ago. Actually he had prepared personal comments on both documents. My surprise when entering the link, which can only opinarse was through a form that "limits" opinion only comments, and restricted to a format for review comment for comment. This means that the initial draft document, which I believe contains a number of shortcomings and misguided claims not directly investigated the facts, it is not feasible to be observed or pourable opinion on it. We must remember that no public comment was restricted to a form, let alone with no possibility of review of the document that gave rise to that form. Unfortunately too late, this period is already closed.I will try how to make a general comment, not particularly on each recommendation, because I think it is an important limiting our freedom of opinion. The link in question: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-pub… Best regards Alberto Soto _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c2ac9f586d.html --]]

1 0

closed public comment 24 MAR 17
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org March 23, 2017

March 23, 2017

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: closed public comment 24 MAR 17 Desde: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org Estimates, as everyone knows, on 24 March 2017, close the comments p venues around the reviewedSeptember n At-Large ITEMS by the company. There were two papers entries, the first draft pages and ninety p then containing the recommendations is sixteen. The view favored this latter, it is obviously very limited without power review the first draft. Since the beginning many members of the WG, we made observations on that draft, which served to comment on the document contains recommendations is sixteen. LACRALO har its inset n on these recommendations, according to what is They come off the WG, and were informed promptly to the list. As recommended that each ALS or ALS pour each member of your OPINION n in the commentary p PUBLIC few minutes ago I tried. Actually Be prepared to personal comments on both documents. My surprise when entering the link was that can only opinarse to a trav s form the view favored only limited to comments, and restricted to a format for review comment for comment. This means that the initial draft document, which I believe contains several shortcomings and misguided claims not directly investigated in fact, it is not feasible to be observed or can be poured VIEW n on it. We must remember that ning n p PUBLIC comment was restricted to a form, and less an no possibility of opinion on the document He gave rise to that form. Unfortunately it is too late, this PERIOD already closed.Try the way making a general comment, not particularly about each RECOMMENDATION No, because I think it is an important limitation n our freedom of opinion. The link in question: < https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-pub lic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-review-draft-report-publ ic-comment-input-template-01feb17-en.pdf Best regards Alberto Soto [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/434497edb8.html --]]

3 3