January 2013 - lac-discuss-en

Meeting Invitation / Post-WCIT Webinar - Thursday 17 January 2013 at 14:00 UTC
by At-Large Staff Jan. 16, 2013

Jan. 16, 2013

Dear All, The At-Large community is holding a post-WCIT (World Conference on International Telecommunications) webinar this Thursday, January 17 between 14:00-15:00 UTC. This webinar will present various perspectives of the WCIT, challenges and opportunities and possible next steps for the At-Large community and ICANN. Guest Speakers include: Nigel Hickson, Vice President for Europe, ICANN Global Stakeholder Engagement Bill Drake, Chair of NCUC and member of the US delegation Avri Doria, Civil Society member of the US delegation, WTSA/WCIT Trip supported by dotgay LLC Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC The agenda, dial in details and time-zone conversion are available at: https://community.icann.org/x/8oRZAg. Adobe Connect: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/wcit/ <http://icann.adobeconnect.com/wcit/> The post-WCIT webinar will offer French and Spanish interpretation. If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org. Thank you. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org One World, One Internet

1 1

=? Iso-8859-1? Q? RES = 3A_ = 09La_fecha_l = EDmite_para_? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Comentarios_en_general_para_la? =
by sylvia＠internautabrasil.org Jan. 16, 2013

Jan. 16, 2013

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? RES = 3A_ = 09La_fecha_l = EDmite_para_? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Comentarios_en_general_para_la? = From: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org Dear Vanessa, Sure you can, LACARALO estabierta all end users Internet of the region. In addition you pondren contact with other members of the region that estn seeing these issues. Any questions, I am at your disposition. Sylvia ___________________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org Secretary LACRALO-ICANN / 2012-2013 - http://atlarge.icann.org 2009-2012 Secretary FLUI sylvia_leite = Skype ----- Mensagem Original ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome of Vanessa Cravo Copetti Submitted in: Wednesdays, January 16, 2013 11:13 To lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] The closing date for comments in general for Hello, Today is the closing date for At-Large for new comments gTLD applications because of objeciny I realized that there is no any of the strings. Amazon and. Patagonia (in At-Large new Dashboard gTLD applications). I think the utilization by compaas objecina particular geographic regions name from Latin America and the Caribbean must be fought, because these names identify regions with People, their community and their rich cultural characteristics. The Amazon is a region encompassing the passes inmeros South Amrica and Patagonia is a part of Argentina, covering several states of the Federation. I wonder if I, who did not participate in any ALS, I can make objections in the dashboard. Vanessa Brazil ---- Original ----- Mensagem From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome lac-discuss-es-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Submitted em: quarta-feira, 16 de janeiro de 2013 10:00 To lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Assunto: Summary of lac-discuss-es, Vol 53, Envo 25 ENVE messages to the list lac-discuss-is lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org To subscribe or unsubscribe travs subscripcina SITE https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es Or mail address, send a message with the text "help" in the subject (subject) or in the body: lac-discuss-es-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org You can reach the person managing the list at: lac-discuss-es-owner(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org If you reply to this message sb content, please edit the line of subject (subject) for the text is more specific: "Re: Contents of lac-discuss-en digest ...".In addition, please include the slo response to those parts of the message which estrespondiendo. Affairs gives: 1. Re: The closing date for comments in general for consideracin objections to new gTLD is January 16 2013 (devtee(a)gmail.com) -------------------------------------------------- -------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 23:37:48 GMT From: devtee(a)gmail.com Subject: Re: The closing date for comments in general for consideracin objections to new gTLD is January 16 2013 To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Message-ID: <201301152337.r0FNbmsY029644 @ mm.icann.org> [[- Translated text (in -> s) -]] Subject: Re: The closing date for comments in general for consideracin objections to new gTLD is January 16, 2013 From: devtee(a)gmail.com Dear All, A reminder that the closing date for comments At-Large on the new gTLD applications based on objecin is January 16, 2013. Visit the At-Large Dashboard new gTLD applications http://bit.ly/newgtld to learn the ALAC may file a objecina a new gTLD application and submit comments. Best regards, Dev Anand Teelucksingh RG chair gTLD On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 at 11:13 PM, <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> wrote: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Deadline for comments At Large for consideration of objections > From: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > French and Spanish versions below > > > Versions franaise ci-dessous et espagnole > > > French and Spanish below > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > On behalf of Dev Anand Teelucksingh, Chair of the At-Large new gTLD > Group, please see the important message below Regarding the upcoming > deadline to submit objections on the new gTLD applications. > > > > > > > > > > > ******** > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > ICANNs At-Large Community (At-Large) through the At-Large Advisory > Committee (ALAC) has the Ability to file > > > objections to new gTLD applications received by ICANN for its New gTLDs > program at <http://gtldresult.icann.org/> http://gtldresult.icann.org/. > > > > > > > The At-Large New gTLD Review Group (RG gTLD) is seeking comments from > At-Large on new gTLD applications > > > by January 16 2013. > > > > > > > At-Large Such comments will be used by the gTLD RG to choose Whether to > draft a formal objection to a gTLD application statement on limited > > > public interest or community grounds for the RALO's consideration and > Before the end of the Objection Period in March 2013. > > > > > > > Please read the attached flyer to understand how the ALAC can file an > objection to a new gTLD. > > > > > > > Visit the At-Large at new gTLD Applications Dashboard > <http://bit.ly/newgtld> http://bit.ly/newgtld > > > to learn how to review information about the gTLD applications and > applicants, > > > At-Large read comments on gTLD applications and strings and how to submit > your comments to the gTLD RG before January 16 2013. > > > > > > > ******** > > > > > > > Chers Tous, > > > > > > > > > > > Au nom de Dev Anand Teelucksingh, prsident du Groupe d'examen des > nouveaux gTLDs veuillez note prendre du ci-dessous important message au > sujet the chance prochaine pour des objections sur les soumettre > des nouveaux gTLD applications. > > > > > > > > > The CommunautAt-Large dICANN (At-Large), par l'intermdiaire du Committee > consultatif At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC), the objections aux des > candidatures des nouveaux par l'ICANN gTLD reues are nouveau pour > gTLD ( <http://gtldresult.icann.org/> http://gtldresult.icann.org/) > > > Le Groupe dexamen At-Large des nouveaux gTLD (gTLD RG) sollicite them > LAT-Large commentaires sur les des nouveaux gTLD applications will Dece > 16 janvier 2013. > > > Ces commentaires seront LAT-Large RG utiliss par le pour gTLD dcider > of rdiger joins dclaration candidature d'objection formelle joins a gTLD > sur des donnes limits public intrt ou d'motifs communautaire, pour > examination RALO et par les lALAC avant priode the end of dopposition in > Mars 2013. > > > Merci de lire ci-joint dpliant pour l'ALAC comment peut comprendre > dposer joins a nouveau gTLD objection. > > > Le Tableau de bord Visitez At-Large des nouveaux sur les gTLD > <http://bit.ly/newgtld> http://bit.ly/newgtld akin d'apprendre comment > vrifier les informations sur les candidatures aux gTLD et les candidats, > Lisez les commentaires sur les At-Large Chanes et les applications et > the faon of soumettre vos commentaires au gTLD avant le 16 janvier RG > > > > > > > > > > > ******** > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > > On behalf of Dev Anand Teelucksingh, Chairman of the Review Group > At-Large new gTLDs, please read the following important message to > then about the next deadline to submit objections > applications for new gTLDs. > > > > > > > > > > > The Community of ICANN At-Large (At-Large) through the At-Large Advisory > Committee (ALAC) > > > You can object to the new applications > ICANN gTLD received for its new gTLD > > > ( <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about> > > > > > > > The At-Large group of New gTLDs (gTLD RG) estbuscando comments > At-Large on new gTLD applications, until January 16, 2013. > > > > > > > Such comments At-Large Sern used by the group hotfix gTLD > RG to decide if a formal Declaration objecina one > application based on a limited interest or community foundations to > consideracin RALOsy the ALAC from the end of the period > objections in March 2013. > > > > > > > Please read the attached document to understand how the ALAC may > objecina present a new gTLD. > > > > > > > Visit the At-Large Dashboard new gTLD applications to: > / / Bit.ly / newgtld to learn how to check the information about the > gTLD applications and applicants, read the comments on At-Large > gTLD applications and as strings and send comments to the group > RG gTLD of revision before January 16, 2013. > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you > > > Merci > > > Thanks > > > > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Gisella Gruber, Matt Ashtiani, Nathalie > Peregrine, Julia Charvolen > > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > > E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0218ce3f32.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] [lac-discuss-es] La fecha límite para comentarios en general para la
by Dev Anand Teelucksingh Jan. 16, 2013

Jan. 16, 2013

Hello Vanessa, Thanks for the email. Certainly you can send comments on limited public interest grounds or community grounds on gTLD applications. This would be reviewed by the At-Large community who in turn can make comments. Send your comment to newgtldrg(a)icann.org and the gTLD RG will create the wiki page and inform you and the At-Large community accordingly. Dev Anand On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Vanessa Copetti Cravo <VanessaC(a)anatel.gov.br> wrote: > Hola, > > Hoy es la fecha límite de At-Large para comentarios para las nuevas solicitudes de gTLD por razones de objeción y me dio cuenta de que no hay ninguna del strings . Amazonas y .Patagonia (in At-Large Dashboard de nuevas solicitudes de gTLD). Creo que a objeción a la utilización por compañías particulares de nombre de regiones geográficas de América Latina y el Caribe debe ser combatido, ya que estos nombres identifican regiones con su Pueblo, su comunidad e su ricas características culturales. La Amazonia es una región que abarca inúmeros países de la América del Sur y la Patagonia es una parte de la Argentina, abarcando varios estados de la Federación. > Me pregunto si yo, que no participo en ninguna ALS, puedo hacer objeciones en el dashboard. > > Vanessa > Brazil > > ----Mensagem original----- > De: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome de lac-discuss-es-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Enviada em: quarta-feira, 16 de janeiro de 2013 10:00 > Para: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Assunto: Resumen de lac-discuss-es, Vol 53, Envío 25 > > Envíe los mensajes para la lista lac-discuss-es a > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Para subscribirse o anular su subscripción a través de la WEB > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > O por correo electrónico, enviando un mensaje con el texto "help" en el asunto (subject) o en el cuerpo a: > lac-discuss-es-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Puede contactar con el responsable de la lista escribiendo a: > lac-discuss-es-owner(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > Si responde a algún contenido de este mensaje, por favor, edite la linea del asunto (subject) para que el texto sea mas especifico que: > "Re: Contents of lac-discuss-es digest...". Además, por favor, incluya en la respuesta sólo aquellas partes del mensaje a las que está respondiendo. > > > Asuntos del día: > > 1. Re: La fecha límite para comentarios en general para la > consideración de las objeciones a los nuevos gTLD es 16 de enero > 2013 (devtee(a)gmail.com) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 23:37:48 GMT > From: devtee(a)gmail.com > Subject: Re: La fecha límite para comentarios en general para la > consideración de las objeciones a los nuevos gTLD es 16 de enero 2013 > To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Message-ID: <201301152337.r0FNbmsY029644(a)mm.icann.org> > > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto: Re: La fecha límite para comentarios en general para la consideración de las objeciones a los nuevos gTLD es 16 de enero 2013 > De: devtee(a)gmail.com > > Queridos todos, > > > Les recordamos que la fecha límite para At-Large comentarios sobre el nuevo gTLD solicitudes por motivos de objeción es 16 de enero 2013. > > > Visite el At-Large Dashboard solicitudes de gTLD nuevos en > http://bit.ly/newgtld para aprender el ALAC puede presentar una objeción a una > nuevo gTLD solicitud y presentar sus comentarios. > > > Saludos cordiales, > > > Dev Anand Teelucksingh > silla RG gTLD > > > > > El Martes, 08 de enero 2013 a las 11:13 PM, <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> escribió: > > >> [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] >> >> Subject: Deadline for comments At Large for consideration of objections to the new gTLDs is the January 16, 2013 >> From: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >> >> French and Spanish versions below >> >> >> Versions franaise ci-dessous et espagnole >> >> >> French and Spanish below >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Dear All, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On behalf of Dev Anand Teelucksingh, Chair of the At-Large new gTLD Review >> Group, please see the important message below Regarding the upcoming >> deadline to submit objections on the new gTLD applications. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ******** >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Dear All, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ICANNs At-Large Community (At-Large) through the At-Large Advisory >> Committee (ALAC) has the Ability to file >> >> >> objections to new gTLD applications received by ICANN for its New gTLDs >> program at <http://gtldresult.icann.org/> http://gtldresult.icann.org/. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The At-Large New gTLD Review Group (RG gTLD) is seeking comments from >> At-Large on new gTLD applications >> >> >> by January 16 2013. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> At-Large Such comments will be used by the gTLD RG to choose Whether to >> draft a formal objection to a gTLD application statement on limited >> >> >> public interest or community grounds for the RALO's consideration and ALAC's >> Before the end of the Objection Period in March 2013. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Please read the attached flyer to understand how the ALAC can file an >> objection to a new gTLD. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Visit the At-Large at new gTLD Applications Dashboard >> <http://bit.ly/newgtld> http://bit.ly/newgtld >> >> >> to learn how to review information about the gTLD applications and >> applicants, >> >> >> At-Large read comments on gTLD applications and strings and how to submit >> your comments to the gTLD RG before January 16 2013. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ******** >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Chers Tous, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Au nom de Dev Anand Teelucksingh, prsident du Groupe d'examen des At-Large >> nouveaux gTLDs veuillez note prendre du ci-dessous important message au >> sujet the chance prochaine pour des objections sur les soumettre >> des nouveaux gTLD applications. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The CommunautAt-Large dICANN (At-Large), par l'intermdiaire du Committee >> consultatif At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC), the objections aux des dposer possibilitde >> candidatures des nouveaux par l'ICANN gTLD reues are nouveau pour Programme >> gTLD ( <http://gtldresult.icann.org/> http://gtldresult.icann.org/) >> >> >> Le Groupe dexamen At-Large des nouveaux gTLD (gTLD RG) sollicite them >> LAT-Large commentaires sur les des nouveaux gTLD applications will Dece >> 16 janvier 2013. >> >> >> Ces commentaires seront LAT-Large RG utiliss par le pour gTLD dcider >> of rdiger joins dclaration candidature d'objection formelle joins a gTLD >> sur des donnes limits public intrt ou d'motifs communautaire, pour >> examination RALO et par les lALAC avant priode the end of dopposition in >> Mars 2013. >> >> >> Merci de lire ci-joint dpliant pour l'ALAC comment peut comprendre >> dposer joins a nouveau gTLD objection. >> >> >> Le Tableau de bord Visitez At-Large des nouveaux sur les gTLD applications >> <http://bit.ly/newgtld> http://bit.ly/newgtld akin d'apprendre comment >> vrifier les informations sur les candidatures aux gTLD et les candidats, >> Lisez les commentaires sur les At-Large Chanes et les applications et gTLD >> the faon of soumettre vos commentaires au gTLD avant le 16 janvier RG 2013. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ******** >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On behalf of Dev Anand Teelucksingh, Chairman of the Review Group >> At-Large new gTLDs, please read the following important message to >> then about the next deadline to submit objections >> applications for new gTLDs. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The Community of ICANN At-Large (At-Large) through the At-Large Advisory >> Committee (ALAC) >> >> >> You can object to the new applications >> ICANN gTLD received for its new gTLD >> >> >> ( <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about> http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The At-Large group of New gTLDs (gTLD RG) estbuscando comments >> At-Large on new gTLD applications, until January 16, 2013. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Such comments At-Large Sern used by the group hotfix gTLD >> RG to decide if a formal Declaration objecina one >> application based on a limited interest or community foundations to >> consideracin RALOsy the ALAC from the end of the period >> objections in March 2013. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Please read the attached document to understand how the ALAC may >> objecina present a new gTLD. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Visit the At-Large Dashboard new gTLD applications to: >> / / Bit.ly / newgtld to learn how to check the information about the >> gTLD applications and applicants, read the comments on At-Large >> gTLD applications and as strings and send comments to the group >> RG gTLD of revision before January 16, 2013. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thank you >> >> >> Merci >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Gisella Gruber, Matt Ashtiani, Nathalie >> Peregrine, Julia Charvolen >> >> >> ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC >> >> >> E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > [[--Original text (en) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c7bf308cae.html > --]] > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > > Fin de Resumen de lac-discuss-es, Vol 53, Envío 25 > ************************************************** > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org

1 0

ENC: UN plans Internet governance amid outcry to defund ITU | ZDNet
by Vanda UOL Jan. 16, 2013

Jan. 16, 2013

Hi everybody. Looks this is an interesting news about ITU. I will never see this happen, but the pressure is good enough to ITU to rethink for the next meetings in April/May 2013 http://www.zdnet.com/un-plans-internet-governance-amid-outcry-to-defund-itu… UN plans Internet governance amid outcry to defund ITU A petition to de-fund the U.N.'s telecom arm emerges just as the ITU readies to hammer out internet governance plans at the World Telecommunication Information and Communication Technology Policy Forum <http://www.itu.int/en/wtpf-13/Pages/default.aspx> meetings in February and May 2013. The website De-fund the ITU <http://DefundTheITU.org> surfaced on the January NANOG (North American Network Operators' Group) email list <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2013-January/subject.html> . Its Whitehouse.gov petition De-fund the ITU <https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/de-fund-itu/mSJ49QcV> demands the U.S. government stop its financial contributions to the ITU. ITU <http://cdn-static.zdnet.com/i/r/story/70/00/009882/itu-200x228.jpg?hash=A2A…> It comes after the ITU's recent attempt at internet governance and monetization through tolls at its WCIT-12 summit in Dubai last month. The U.N. debacle prompted widespread internet outrage, an unprecedented unanimous U.S. House of Representatives vote in opposition <http://www.zdnet.com/u-s-now-totally-unified-in-opposition-of-u-n-internet-…> , and refusal from 55 countries to sign the ITU's treaty. No matter - as usual, the ITU has its own plans. Five days ago ITU's Secretary-General Hamadoun Touré released the fourth and final ITU/WTPF-13 report <http://www.itu.int/md/S12-WTPF13PREP-R-0005/en> outlining groundwork for internet governance (and internet regulatory topics) at upcoming meetings on February 6-8 and May 14-16. Discussions at WTPF-13 will be based on this report and will serve as the sole working document of the Forum. ITU re-defines "multistakeholder" The ITU/WTPF-13 report explicitly includes the creation of "Global Principles for the governance and use of the Internet" and resolving issues pertaining to "use of Internet resources for purposes that are inconsistent with international peace, stability and security." The Report explains the current multistakeholder model of internet governance is "under discussion" and acknowledges that members Cisco, U.K., U.S., and ISOC view the current governance of the Internet as "sufficient." However, "with regards to international Internet-related public policy, the role of one stakeholder – Governments – has not been allowed to evolve." For the Policy Forum, the ITU also has 64 "informal Experts" weighing in. The "experts" are comprised mostly of Member State telecom representatives (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Iran, others), plus individuals representing the interests and opinions of Verizon, Cisco Systems, British Telecom, the FCC, The Internet Society, ARIN, ICANN, and PayPal. Who funds the ITU? The website promoting the petition, defundtheitu.org <http://defundtheitu.org/> , provides details and ITU funding summaries showing which countries contribute to the ITU and the tech companies (Member Sectors) that provide millions to continue the ITU (and its subgroups) respective missions. According to The ITU’s 2012-2015 membership roll and dues <http://defundtheitu.com/uploads/S11-CL-C-0041.pdf> one Contributory Unit is equivalent to CHF 318,000 (1 Swiss Franc equals $1.10). Currently the US pays 30 Contributory Units (nearly $11 million per year) to the ITU as does Japan, making the two countries its top donors. Other big contributors include Germany at 25 units, Italy: 15, Saudi Arabia: 13, China: 12, UK: 10, Russia: 10. Member Sector donations contribute additional monies to ITU subgroups. American Member Sector companies include Apple, AT&T, Cisco, Intel, Motorola, Sprint, Verizon and many more. (Member Sector entities pay self-elected Contributory Units for ITU-T, R and D participation currently set at one-tenth what Member States pay - 31,800 Swiss Francs per "member" contributory unit per sector.) Financial support for ITU is also provided by the U.S. in that international organizations - namely the ITU and its employees - are exempted from U.S. Federal tax withholding (Exhibit 5.19.11-13: International Organizations Exempt from Federal Withholding Requirements <http://www.irs.gov/irm/part5/irm_05-019-011r-cont01.html#d0e5707> ). WCIT-12 outrage, ITU duplicity, and aftermath One month ago the U.N.'s ITU held its World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT-12) in Dubai, where Member States proposed revisions to the International Telecommunication Regulations (ITR) - to expand jurisdiction over the Internet, such as creating pay-per-use tolls, heightening surveillance, and to give nation states increased control over the Internet. Global opposition created an epic backlash, fueled by the ITU's insistence to keep conference documents from the public - despite ITU's insistence its process was transparent. In response to ITU's secretive processes researchers at George Mason University created WCITLeaks <http://wcitleaks.org/> , a website that solicited and shared copies of leaked WCIT/ITU documents. As WCIT-12 unfolded, leaked proposals revealed plans from Russia, China, and similar regimes <http://www.zdnet.com/wcit-12-leak-shows-russia-china-others-seek-to-define-…> for an ITU-supported play at WCIT-12 to define the internet as a system of government-controlled networks, among other deeply disturbing intents. Democratic and free speech organizations joined internet giants in the outcry, such as Google with its Take Action <https://www.google.com/takeaction/> campaign, and the formation of country blocs included the U.S., the European Parliament, Canada, Mexico and more. * See also: U.N. readies for protests on eve of secret Internet regulation treaty <http://www.zdnet.com/u-n-readies-for-protests-on-eve-of-secret-internet-reg…> At WCIT conference end, the ITU went back on its specific promises that the treaty would not be about the internet and would not be put to a vote. Eli Dourado is a co-founder of WCITLeaks and was a member of the US delegation to WCIT-12. In Behind closed doors at the U.N.’s attempted <http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/12/behind-closed-doors-at-the-uns-a…> "takeover of the Internet" Dourado wrote, The purpose of the meeting, claimed ITU Secretary-General Hamadoun Touré, was simply to update the treaty that governs international phone calls; it had last been revised in 1988, when most phone companies were state-owned monopolies. Claims that the conference would implicate the Internet were part of a misinformation campaign pursued by unnamed opponents of the ITU, Touré said. Dourado described how the ITU forced its treaty agreement with a vote that it insisted was not a vote: (...) What followed was surreal. The Chairman calmly said that he had a long list of countries wishing to speak, and that in lieu of going through the list, he was going to take the “feel of the room” by asking countries to hold up their voting boards if they supported the resolution as amended by the Secretary-General. After also asking for those against, the Chairman said simply, “The majority is with having the resolution in.” After some applause, he added, “Thank you. Now we can go to Corrigendum 2.” There were immediate inquiries from the UK and Spain as to whether we had just decided the issue by a vote. We had been promised, after all, that there would be no votes, that all decisions would be decided by consensus. In response to the UK’s inquiry, the Chairman replied, “The majority agreed to adopt the resolution as amended.” In response to Spain’s, the Chairman answered, “No, it was not a vote, and I was clear about it. Thank you, Spain.” De-fund the ITU <http://DefundTheITU.org> claims, Their goal was a coup: to overthrow the open and transparent system of Internet governance that ensures the Internet’s freedom and accessibility, and replace it with their own central point of absolute control, through which policies of censorship and repression could be enacted. The U.S. and 54 countries revolted and refused to sign. This prompted subsequent headlines that claimed the ITU had failed its attempt at an Internet power-grab, and that the treaty was defeated. Meanwhile, some the 89 signing countries hurried home to begin implementation of the problematic new treaty. At The Internet Society's Post-WCIT Roundtable panel <http://www.internetsociety.org/articles/wcit-postmortem> on December 21, U.S. Ambassador Terry Kramer, head of Delegation WCIT-12, expressed serious concern about what will happen as the 89 governments move toward treaty implementation. Amb. Kramer unequivocally stated that, "the ITU needs to step back from governance and content." He cautioned the room that America may have taken a stand against the treaty, but that "the U.S. does not own the internet." Kramer said, "The internet must be left alone." If the De-Fund The ITU <https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/de-fund-itu/mSJ49QcV> petition and movement is successful in the U.S., the ITU stands to lose 7.7% of its budget. It could indeed hurt the slippery organization, which has had to increase the dollar amount of Contributory Units as membership and elected contributions have dwindled over the past decade. And if Secretary-General Hamadoun Touré's ITU/WTPF-13 far-reaching internet governance report is any indication, ITU needs the internet now more than ever. One thing is certain: the internet does not need the ITU. --Steve (via iPad 3)

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] =? Iso-8859-1? Q? La_fecha_l = EDmite_para_comentario? == Iso-8859-1? Q? S_en_general_para_la? =
by VanessaC＠anatel.gov.br Jan. 16, 2013

Jan. 16, 2013

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? La_fecha_l = EDmite_para_comentario? == Iso-8859-1? Q? S_en_general_para_la? = From: VanessaC(a)anatel.gov.br Hello, Today is the closing date for comments At-Large for new gTLD applications because of objeciny I realized that's no strings. Amazon and. Patagonia (in At-Large Dashboard new gTLD applications). I think the utilization by compaas objecina particular geographic regions name from Latin America and the Caribbean must be fought, because these names identify regions with his people, his community and its rich character cultural sticas. The Amazon is a region covering the passes inmeros South Amrica and Patagonia is a part of Argentina, covering several states of the Federation. I wonder if I, who did not participate in any ALS, I can make objections on the dashboard. Vanessa Brazil ---- Original ----- Mensagem From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome of lac-discuss-es-request @ AtLarge-lists . icann.org Submitted em: quarta-feira, 16 de janeiro de 2013 10:00 To lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Assunto: Summary of lac-discuss-es, Vol 53, Envo 25 ENVE messages to the list lac-discuss-is lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org To subscribe or unsubscribe travs subscripcina SITE https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es Or mail address, send a message with the text "help" in the subject (subject) or in the body to: lac-discuss-es-request(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org You can reach the person managing the list at: lac-discuss-es-owner(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org If you reply to this message sb content, please edit the subject line (subject) so that the text is more specific: "Re: Contents of lac-discuss-en digest ...". In addition, please include in the response slo those parts of the message to which estrespondiendo. Affairs gives: 1. Re: The closing date for comments in general for consideracin objections to new gTLD is January 16 2013 (devtee(a)gmail.com) -------------------------------------------------- -------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 23:37:48 GMT From: devtee(a)gmail.com Subject: Re: The closing date for comments in general for consideracin objections to new gTLD is January 16, 2013 To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Message-ID: <201301152337.r0FNbmsY029644 @ mm.icann.org> [[- Translated text (in -> s) -]] Subject: Re: The closing date for comments consideracin general for objections to new gTLD is January 16, 2013 From: devtee(a)gmail.com Dear All, A reminder that the closing date for At-Large feedback on new gTLD applications based on objecin is January 16, 2013. Visit the At-Large Dashboard new gTLD applications http://bit.ly/newgtld to learn the ALAC may file a objecina one new gTLD application and submit comments. Best regards, Dev Anand Teelucksingh RG chair gTLD On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 at 11:13 PM, <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> wrote: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Deadline for comments At Large for consideration of objections to the new gTLDs is the January 16, 2013 > From: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > French and Spanish versions below > > > Versions franaise ci-dessous et espagnole > > > French and Spanish below > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > On behalf of Dev Anand Teelucksingh, Chair of the At-Large new gTLD Review > Group, please see the important message below Regarding the upcoming > deadline to submit objections on the new gTLD applications. > > > > > > > > > > > ******** > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > ICANNs At-Large Community (At-Large) through the At-Large Advisory > Committee (ALAC) has the Ability to file > > > objections to new gTLD applications received by ICANN for its New gTLDs > program at <http://gtldresult.icann.org/> http://gtldresult.icann.org/. > > > > > > > The At-Large New gTLD Review Group (RG gTLD) is seeking comments from > At-Large on new gTLD applications > > > by January 16 2013. > > > > > > > At-Large Such comments will be used by the gTLD RG to choose Whether to > draft a formal objection to a gTLD application statement on limited > > > public interest or community grounds for the RALO's consideration and ALAC's > Before the end of the Objection Period in March 2013. > > > > > > > Please read the attached flyer to understand how the ALAC can file an > objection to a new gTLD. > > > > > > > Visit the At-Large at new gTLD Applications Dashboard > <http://bit.ly/newgtld> http://bit.ly/newgtld > > > to learn how to review information about the gTLD applications and > applicants, > > > At-Large read comments on gTLD applications and strings and how to submit > your comments to the gTLD RG before January 16 2013. > > > > > > > ******** > > > > > > > Chers Tous, > > > > > > > > > > > Au nom de Dev Anand Teelucksingh, prsident du Groupe d'examen des At-Large > nouveaux gTLDs veuillez note prendre du ci-dessous important message au > sujet the chance prochaine pour des objections sur les soumettre > des nouveaux gTLD applications. > > > > > > > > > The CommunautAt-Large dICANN (At-Large), par l'intermdiaire du Committee > consultatif At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC), the objections aux des dposer possibilitde > candidatures des nouveaux par l'ICANN gTLD reues are nouveau pour Programme > gTLD ( <http://gtldresult.icann.org/> http://gtldresult.icann.org/) > > > Le Groupe dexamen At-Large des nouveaux gTLD (gTLD RG) sollicite them > LAT-Large commentaires sur les des nouveaux gTLD applications will Dece > 16 janvier 2013. > > > Ces commentaires seront LAT-Large RG utiliss par le pour gTLD dcider > of rdiger joins dclaration candidature d'objection formelle joins a gTLD > sur des donnes limits public intrt ou d'motifs communautaire, pour > examination RALO et par les lALAC avant priode the end of dopposition in > Mars 2013. > > > Merci de lire ci-joint dpliant pour l'ALAC comment peut comprendre > dposer joins a nouveau gTLD objection. > > > Le Tableau de bord Visitez At-Large des nouveaux sur les gTLD applications > <http://bit.ly/newgtld> http://bit.ly/newgtld akin d'apprendre comment > vrifier les informations sur les candidatures aux gTLD et les candidats, > Lisez les commentaires sur les At-Large Chanes et les applications et gTLD > the faon of soumettre vos commentaires au gTLD avant le 16 janvier RG 2013. > > > > > > > > > > > ******** > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > > On behalf of Dev Anand Teelucksingh, Chairman of the Review Group > At-Large new gTLDs, please read the following important message to > then about the next deadline to submit objections > applications for new gTLDs. > > > > > > > > > > > The Community of ICANN At-Large (At-Large) through the At-Large Advisory > Committee (ALAC) > > > You can object to the new applications > ICANN gTLD received for its new gTLD > > > ( <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about> http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about) > > > > > > > The At-Large group of New gTLDs (gTLD RG) estbuscando comments > At-Large on new gTLD applications, until January 16, 2013. > > > > > > > Such comments At-Large Sern used by the group hotfix gTLD > RG to decide if a formal Declaration objecina one > application based on a limited interest or community foundations to > consideracin RALOsy the ALAC from the end of the period > objections in March 2013. > > > > > > > Please read the attached document to understand how the ALAC may > objecina present a new gTLD. > > > > > > > Visit the At-Large Dashboard new gTLD applications to: > / / Bit.ly / newgtld to learn how to check the information about the > gTLD applications and applicants, read the comments on At-Large > gTLD applications and as strings and send comments to the group > RG gTLD of revision before January 16, 2013. > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you > > > Merci > > > Thanks > > > > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Gisella Gruber, Matt Ashtiani, Nathalie > Peregrine, Julia Charvolen > > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > > E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c4129c1d1c.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Deadline for comments At Large for consideration of objections to the new gTLDs is January 16, 2013
by Dev Anand Teelucksingh Jan. 15, 2013

Jan. 15, 2013

Dear All, A reminder that the deadline for At-Large comments on new gTLD applications on objection grounds is January 16 2013. Visit the At-Large new gTLD Applications Dashboard at http://bit.ly/newgtld to learn how the ALAC can file an objection to a new gTLD application and to submit your comments. Kind Regards, Dev Anand Teelucksingh gTLD RG chair On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:13 PM, <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> wrote: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Deadline for comments At Large for consideration of objections to the new gTLDs is the January 16, 2013 > From: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > French and Spanish versions below > > > Versions franaise ci-dessous et espagnole > > > French and Spanish below > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > On behalf of Dev Anand Teelucksingh, Chair of the At-Large new gTLD Review > Group, please see the important message below Regarding the upcoming > deadline to submit objections on the new gTLD applications. > > > > > > > > > > > ******** > > > > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > ICANNs At-Large Community (At-Large) through the At-Large Advisory > Committee (ALAC) has the Ability to file > > > objections to new gTLD applications received by ICANN for its New gTLDs > program at <http://gtldresult.icann.org/> http://gtldresult.icann.org/. > > > > > > > The At-Large New gTLD Review Group (RG gTLD) is seeking comments from > At-Large on new gTLD applications > > > by January 16 2013. > > > > > > > At-Large Such comments will be used by the gTLD RG to choose Whether to > draft a formal objection to a gTLD application statement on limited > > > public interest or community grounds for the RALO's consideration and ALAC's > Before the end of the Objection Period in March 2013. > > > > > > > Please read the attached flyer to understand how the ALAC can file an > objection to a new gTLD. > > > > > > > Visit the At-Large at new gTLD Applications Dashboard > <http://bit.ly/newgtld> http://bit.ly/newgtld > > > to learn how to review information about the gTLD applications and > applicants, > > > At-Large read comments on gTLD applications and strings and how to submit > your comments to the gTLD RG before January 16 2013. > > > > > > > ******** > > > > > > > Chers Tous, > > > > > > > > > > > Au nom de Dev Anand Teelucksingh, prsident du Groupe d'examen des At-Large > nouveaux gTLDs veuillez note prendre du ci-dessous important message au > sujet the chance prochaine pour des objections sur les soumettre > des nouveaux gTLD applications. > > > > > > > > > The CommunautAt-Large dICANN (At-Large), par l'intermdiaire du Committee > consultatif At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC), the objections aux des dposer possibilitde > candidatures des nouveaux par l'ICANN gTLD reues are nouveau pour Programme > gTLD ( <http://gtldresult.icann.org/> http://gtldresult.icann.org/) > > > Le Groupe dexamen At-Large des nouveaux gTLD (gTLD RG) sollicite them > LAT-Large commentaires sur les des nouveaux gTLD applications will Dece > 16 janvier 2013. > > > Ces commentaires seront LAT-Large RG utiliss par le pour gTLD dcider > of rdiger joins dclaration candidature d'objection formelle joins a gTLD > sur des donnes limits public intrt ou d'motifs communautaire, pour > examination RALO et par les lALAC avant priode the end of dopposition in > Mars 2013. > > > Merci de lire ci-joint dpliant pour l'ALAC comment peut comprendre > dposer joins a nouveau gTLD objection. > > > Le Tableau de bord Visitez At-Large des nouveaux sur les gTLD applications > <http://bit.ly/newgtld> http://bit.ly/newgtld akin d'apprendre comment > vrifier les informations sur les candidatures aux gTLD et les candidats, > Lisez les commentaires sur les At-Large Chanes et les applications et gTLD > the faon of soumettre vos commentaires au gTLD avant le 16 janvier RG 2013. > > > > > > > > > > > ******** > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > > On behalf of Dev Anand Teelucksingh, Chairman of the Review Group > At-Large new gTLDs, please read the following important message to > then about the next deadline to submit objections > applications for new gTLDs. > > > > > > > > > > > The Community of ICANN At-Large (At-Large) through the At-Large Advisory > Committee (ALAC) > > > You can object to the new applications > ICANN gTLD received for its new gTLD > > > ( <http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about> http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about) > > > > > > > The At-Large group of New gTLDs (gTLD RG) estbuscando comments > At-Large on new gTLD applications, until January 16, 2013. > > > > > > > Such comments At-Large Sern used by the group hotfix gTLD > RG to decide if a formal Declaration objecina one > application based on a limited interest or community foundations to > consideracin RALOsy the ALAC from the end of the period > objections in March 2013. > > > > > > > Please read the attached document to understand how the ALAC may > objecina present a new gTLD. > > > > > > > Visit the At-Large Dashboard new gTLD applications to: > / / Bit.ly / newgtld to learn how to check the information about the > gTLD applications and applicants, read the comments on At-Large > gTLD applications and as strings and send comments to the group > RG gTLD of revision before January 16, 2013. > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you > > > Merci > > > Thanks > > > > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Gisella Gruber, Matt Ashtiani, Nathalie > Peregrine, Julia Charvolen > > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > > E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (es) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/ef8c007f00.html > --]] > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en

1 0

Agreeing with your blog comments about vote
by Vanda UOL Jan. 15, 2013

Jan. 15, 2013

Dear Avri ( sorry to send to all 3 addresses I have from you, don't know which is the best one!) After carefully read your blog about elections/vote , I do agree the system is not the best. I hate excuses as people is not capable to vote, since from this region we are tired to hear such excuses from dictators trying to explain why they need to continue to govern.... Nothing is less democratic than to decide that people can not vote and use several reasons to support such theory. Wider suffrage may be difficult to control and to have it in a proper manner will cost too much. But to have each ALS to vote I see no big deal. We already vote for all positions representing the region, both inside the Ralo or to seat at ALAC, so what is the problem to vote for the seat 15? Not the same number of representatives from each region? Can be solved with a adequate weight for some region's votes. The seat 15 is there to represent the users in general, so the users must be able to choose their representative. Allowing only ALAC plus the chairs can be easily driven to this or that person. What I see as relevant is a candidate to be submitted to a huge process of debate about candidate's knowledge and capacity to represent all regions, but this can be done with a interview to each candidate by each Ralo. I also see a limit, based on curriculum vitae, of candidates - may be around 3 - to such position to not have a whole year of interviews. Anyway, count on me to try to change the vote rule, specially because we will enter the process to substitute Sebastien ( he entered when I left Oct 2010- since the start point changed he got 6 more months added to the 3 years term a- starting on june 2011. - june 2014) There is also another movement to have all member to leave and enter at the same time (good for the nomcom since give the clear view what have been chosen by SOs before the decision, allowing the group to select a more balanced board). If this happen, I am in favor to end Sebastien term in december this year, which give us small amount of time to question the rule. So let's work. All the best Vanda Scartezini Sent from my iPad

3 2

Re: [lac-discuss-en] [WHOIS-WG] Thick Whois
by Carlton Samuels Jan. 15, 2013

Jan. 15, 2013

With respect to gTLDS - purposely draw for distinction against ccTLDs - the larger problem is philosophical; the Internet as commons, a resource accessible to all peoples. This is about whether we concede rules for the commons that all must obey, regardless of provenance, location or how exceptional - or worthy of exception - we think we are. WHOIS is a perfect setting for the evolving tragedy of the commons. In some ways the .cat business is a red herring, since it has all the trappings of a private club and with restricted access. [I can't wait for the contest surrounding the so-called 'private' gTLDs in this round.] Current WHOIS policy commits registrars to collect and store certain pieces of data, inclusive of personal data, from all lessees of domain names. We call lessees 'registrants' and that data collected the WHOIS 'data set'. Current policy also compels registrars to make this data available on request by one or other means. The policy does not address use thereafter. And it expressly redlines access for ordinary Internet users; registrars may not place any hindrance whatsoever to their access. The WHOIS debate surrounds four (4) top-of-mind issues: Compliance, Accuracy, Access and Enforcement. For the arguments to take hold, these are now viewed thru the lens of certain 'rights' and 'freedoms', be those justiciable or notional. Never the collective responsibilities. There is the right to privacy, to be left alone, to be anonymous and to be forgotten. Like the moving finger of Khayyam's verse, to write and move on. Except in this case, to be blotted from consciousness and from memory. Or, concession granted, to be ignored. Then there is the right to be informed. And by extending some arguments, to be misinformed. There is the freedom of thought, of conscience and of speech. The freedom to freely access information, to impinge or impose one's presence on others on the commons without let or hindrance. All rights and freedoms are equal and indivisible. Some channel Orwell in disputation here. They contend some rights are definitely more equal than others. The little fellas, sometimes labeled 'usual suspects' are of a mind here. They make a self-serving extension to this argument. They say tell me what right or freedom it is. And I will tell you how much of it you have! Of course, authoritatively speaking. Some say registrants equal users, the universal set, indivisible. They are happy to equate/conflate the needs/objectives of all users with the needs/objectives of registrants. And they implicitly accept all needs/objectives as benign. Free peoples everywhere have an unfettered right to redress of grievance; the 'knowing' is the beginning for this process. When these views - or their mashups! - are examined within the WHOIS context, they together produce a frothy blend, all the way from the philosophical thru the political, even to the far plainly contrarian edge. Some tend to the philosophical belief that if one chooses to be on the commons then there are no rules to which one could be compelled. So therefore collection of any data whatsoever, regardless of intended use, is a rank violation of rights and privileges to which one is entitled. By extension, one readily accepts inaccurate WHOIS data as indignant pushback against an oppressive regime and scabrous imposition. As Sir Humphrey might have said, a case for 'moral *manoeuvreability*'. Others believe sure, collect. But until we can guarantee use/interpretation of the data, then demand for that data is overreaching. They equally fervently hold that to impose pre-screening of anything they themselves would place on the commons for whatever purpose is a squalid attempt to suppress the several freedoms to which they are born. And no, we do not need a referee for this conundrum. Here's the thing. These arguments/beliefs/justifications will not go away with another WHOIS data model or an implementation that allows 'differentiated access'. For long before we get to the access question, there are the questions what to collect and why collect? Someone or thing must decide what and why. Even more acutely political, that agency must account the context in which these questions must be asked. That exists today and the fight is joined. For sure, the new dispensation that is wished comes with access questions. Yes, questions. I can see the battle lines now. -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Patrick Vande Walle < patrick(a)vande-walle.eu> wrote: > While on the subject, it is worth noting, as Michele Neylon pointed out > on his blog, that the .Cat Registry Whois Now Respects EU Privacy Laws > > http://www.internetnews.me/2013/01/10/cat-registry-whois-now-respects-eu-pr… > > Of course, the ICANN process to allow a contracted party to simply obey > the law is than optimal. It could be made less burdensome by simply > including a one-liner in agreements stating that the the provisions > regarding the WHOIS which are contrary to the local law are void. > > Anyway, this once again demonstrates that the current WHOIS system is > broken, and that we need a replacement ASAP. The work on WEIRDS/RDAP is > well advanced, as are several open source implementations. > It will allow differentiated access. However, it is not up to IETF to > draft the policies regarding this. One suggestion the ALAC could make is to > start right away with designing the policy side. It will take time. So, the > sooner the ICANN community begins, the sooner we will have a working > replacement for the WHOIS that will, at the same time, both address the > LEAs concerns and repect the fundamental rights to privacy and free speech. > > -- > Patrick Vande Walle > > Twitter: twitter.vande-walle.eu > Facebook: facebook.vande-walle.eu > LinkedIn: linkedin.vande-walle.eu > > > > On 10/01/13 16:52, Carlton Samuels wrote: > > This questionnaire with its answers reiterates the ALAC's WHOIS positions > expressed at multiple times and in many places in this one place. > > It gets my support. > > Add the URLs to previous ALAC WHOIS Statements and its good to go. > > -Carlton > Chair, At-Large WHOIS WG > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca>wrote: > >> ALAC input was requested by the ongoing GNSO PDP on mandating a Thick >> Whois for all registries. Although previous ALAC statements made it clear >> that we were strongly in support of Thick Whois, we had not specifically >> addressed all of the issues being discussed in the WG. >> >> A draft reply can be found at https://community.icann.org/x/kIVZAg. >> >> Comments welcome, but note that the target reply date was today. I have >> said that ALAC would be responding but that we would be late, but quick >> action would be appreciated. >> >> A copy is also attached here for your convenience. >> <http://linkedin.vande-walle.eu> > > > > _______________________________________________ > WHOIS-WG mailing list > WHOIS-WG(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/whois-wg > > WHOIS WG Wiki: > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Whois+Policy >

1 0

=? Iso-8859-1? Q? RES = 3A_ = 09 * _Enorme_Agradecimiento? == Iso-8859-1? Q? _ * _para_todos_los_implicados_en_conseguir_las_trans? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Cripciones_de_At-Large_Reuniones_del_Grupo_de_Traba? == iso-8859-1? q? jo_hace_4_d = EDas_despu = E9s_de_las_Reuniones? =
by sylvia＠internautabrasil.org Jan. 15, 2013

Jan. 15, 2013

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: =? Iso-8859-1? Q? RES = 3A_ = 09 * _Enorme_Agradecimiento? == Iso-8859-1? Q? _ * _para_todos_los_implicados_en_conseguir_las_trans? == Iso-8859-1? Q? Cripciones_de_At-Large_Reuniones_del_Grupo_de_Traba? == iso-8859-1? q? jo_hace_4_d = EDas_despu = E9s_de_las_Reuniones? = From: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org Dear, No doubt that everyone should join this appreciation. It is vital for our reginy something always asking; So thank you, Thank you so much!! Sylvia ___________________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org Secretary LACRALO-ICANN / 2012-2013 - http://atlarge.icann.org 2009-2012 Secretary FLUI sylvia_leite = Skype ----- Mensagem Original ----- From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [Mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome de Fatima Cambronero Submitted in: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 14:33 To lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Cc: LACRALO discussion list Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] * huge thanks * for all involved in getting the transcripts of At-Large Group Meetings Working for 4 das despus Meetings Dev, all I join these congratulations and appreciation to the Staff of At-Large and Services have available to achieve Lingsticos transcripts working groups so directly. Also regarding the WG LACRALO where recibnotificaciones published transcripts, to das few teleconference. Thank you very much for this work. Take this opportunity to apply, as far as possible, if you could make a Pequeo also endeavor to achieve that are available in the smaller long as possible, transcripts of teleconferences LACRALO monthly since only been published on the wiki up the reunin April of last year. That will be very useful because many times the minutes are not enough to reflect all that is discutien each reunin. Again I appreciate all the work done and greatly appreciate count with all these transcripts. Best regards, Fatima On January 15, 2013 12:22 <devtee(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto: * Enorme Agradecimiento * para todos los implicados en > conseguir las transcripciones de At-Large Reuniones del Grupo de > Trabajo hace 4 días después de las Reuniones > De: devtee(a)gmail.com > > Queridos todos, > > > Estoy absolutamente * * encantados. > > > Revisé la página de la reunión de la conferencia telefónica el jueves > ESADT > 10 de enero 2013 en https://community.icann.org/x/I4RZAg > y vio que la transcripción de esta reunión fue subido por At-Large > El personal de lunes 14 de enero de 2013 > > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ESADT+Transcript+2013-01-1 > 0 > > > Del mismo modo, la LACRALO Traducción WG llamada el jueves 10 de > enero > 2013 > ( https://community.icann.org/x/lINZAg) > esta reunión ha escrito en Inglés y Español. > > > Apenas 4 días después de la llamada! > > > Felicitaciones, felicitaciones, felicitaciones, felicitaciones, > felicitaciones a At-Large, ICANN Idioma Servicios y para cualquier > otra persona involucrada para conseguir las transcripciones hecho en > de manera oportuna. > > > Con demasiada frecuencia, muchas transcripciones de At-Large llamadas > de conferencia del Grupo de Trabajo fueron de ser publicado meses > después de la llamada. > > > Como señalé en mis comentarios en el año 2012 > (Http://forum.icann.org/lists/language-services-policy/msg00004.html) > en el (entonces) Idioma Proyecto de Política de Servicios: > > > "La capacidad de ofrecer servicios lingüísticos a las > transcripciones de WG reuniones de manera oportuna (dentro de unos > días) antes de la próxima WG reunión (por lo general una vez por > semana o una vez cada dos semanas o una vez al > mes) > crucial para permitir la discusión de los asuntos pertinentes al > Grupo de Trabajo por Miembros y observadores del Grupo de Trabajo > para impactar las discusiones en la prÃ³xima WG reuniÃ³n ". > > > Espero que la oportuna publicaciÃ³n de las transcripciones de las > reuniones de At-Large continÃºa. > > > > > Saludos cordiales, > > > Dev Anand Teelucksingh > ALAC miembro de LACRALO > _______________________________________________ > > > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/18219788cb.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] * Enorme Agradecimiento * para todos los implicados en conseguir las transcripciones de At-Large Reuniones del Grupo de Trabajo hace 4 días después de las Reuniones
by Fatima Cambronero Jan. 15, 2013

Jan. 15, 2013

Dev, todos, Me sumo a estas felicitaciones y agradecimiento al Staff de At-Large y de Servicios Lingüísticos por lograr tener disponibles las transcripciones de los grupos de trabajo de manera tan inmediata. También respecto de los WG de LACRALO, donde recibí notificaciones de las transcripciones publicadas, a los pocos días de la teleconferencia. Muchas gracias por este trabajo. Aprovecho para solicitar, en la medida de lo posible, si se pudiera hacer un pequeño esfuerzo también, para lograr que estén disponibles en el menor tiempo que sea posible, las transcripciones de las teleconferencias mensuales de LACRALO, ya que solo se encuentran publicadas en la wiki hasta la reunión de abril del año pasado. Eso sería muy útil ya que muchas veces las minutas no alcanzan a reflejar todo lo que se discutió en cada reunión. Nuevamente valoro todo el trabajo realizado y agradezco enormemente contar con todas estas transcripciones. Saludos cordiales, Fatima El 15 de enero de 2013 12:22, <devtee(a)gmail.com> escribió: > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto: * Enorme Agradecimiento * para todos los implicados en conseguir > las transcripciones de At-Large Reuniones del Grupo de Trabajo hace 4 días > después de las Reuniones > De: devtee(a)gmail.com > > Queridos todos, > > > Estoy absolutamente * * encantados. > > > Revisé la página de la reunión de la conferencia telefónica el jueves > ESADT > 10 de enero 2013 en https://community.icann.org/x/I4RZAg > y vio que la transcripción de esta reunión fue subido por At-Large > El personal de lunes 14 de enero de 2013 > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/ESADT+Transcript+2013-01-10 > > > Del mismo modo, la LACRALO Traducción WG llamada el jueves 10 de enero > 2013 > ( https://community.icann.org/x/lINZAg) > esta reunión ha escrito en Inglés y Español. > > > Apenas 4 días después de la llamada! > > > Felicitaciones, felicitaciones, felicitaciones, felicitaciones, > felicitaciones a At-Large, ICANN Idioma > Servicios y para cualquier otra persona involucrada para conseguir las > transcripciones hecho en > de manera oportuna. > > > Con demasiada frecuencia, muchas transcripciones de At-Large llamadas de > conferencia del Grupo de Trabajo fueron > de ser publicado meses después de la llamada. > > > Como señalé en mis comentarios en el año 2012 > (Http://forum.icann.org/lists/language-services-policy/msg00004.html) > en el (entonces) Idioma Proyecto de Política de Servicios: > > > "La capacidad de ofrecer servicios lingüísticos a las > transcripciones de WG > reuniones de manera oportuna (dentro de unos días) antes de la próxima WG > reunión (por lo general una vez por semana o una vez cada dos semanas o > una vez al > mes) > crucial para permitir la discusión de los asuntos pertinentes al Grupo de > Trabajo por > Miembros y observadores del Grupo de Trabajo para impactar las > discusiones en la prÃ³xima WG > reuniÃ³n ". > > > Espero que la oportuna publicaciÃ³n de las transcripciones de las > reuniones de At-Large continÃºa. > > > > > Saludos cordiales, > > > Dev Anand Teelucksingh > ALAC miembro de LACRALO > _______________________________________________ > > > > [[--Original text (en) > http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/e9bb9521f8.html > --]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > -- *Fatima Cambronero* Abogada-Argentina Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter: @facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero *Join the LACRALO/ICANN discussions:* https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es *Join the Diplo Internet Governance Community discussions:* http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/ *Join to the Internet Society (ISOC): *http://www.internetsociety.org/

2 1