May 2013 - lac-discuss-en - lists.icann.org

REMINDER: MEETING REPORTS
by ICANN At-Large Staff May 3, 2013

May 3, 2013

Dear All, As a reminder, please be sure to submit your meeting reports to the At-Large Beijing Meeting Reports Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/gYU3Ag>. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

3 2

Re: [lac-discuss-en] LACRALO Regional Council - TEDIC
by josefranciscoarce＠gmail.com May 2, 2013

May 2, 2013

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: LACRALO Regional Council - TEDIC From: josefranciscoarce(a)gmail.com Dear, First of all, I want to thank you for the debate made regarding the application. Asmismo want to tell something about the procedure: The region does not have a target date for sending the regional council, and is more, if the region is decided, you can not send it. This in ALAC research and take into account what LACRALO (all of us) says or does not say. But that answer should be within a reasonable time to ALAC can be issued by the positive or negative. And give them time to conduct their own investigations. This comment comes because TEDIC submitted his application in January 2013 and after several requests to freshly community now we have our discussion and share opinions. I think, by the state of situation, we can reach a consensus regional counsel for the association so TEDIC be formally accepted. So taking the wiki comments and comments from the list enviarel mail and gives May 4, except opposition to any of you, favorable regional advice. Take this opportunity to greet you all with affection JosArce. - To: LACRALO Spanish > Asunto: [lac-discuss-es] Consejo Regional LACRALO - TEDIC > > Estimados, > > En virtud de que el día 5 de mayo hay que informar si la región realiza o > no > un consejo regional para la asociación TEDIC- Tecnología, Educación, > Desarrollo, Investigación y Comunicación Paraguay , es que me pongo en > contacto con ustedes para comentarles los siguientes hechos > > 1) TEDIC- presento pedido formal de ingreso > > 2) Se invito a la representante de TEDIC a dos teleconferencias mensuales > para conversar con la región y no concurrió a ninguna, por diversos > motivos. > > 3) Se abrió el espacio wiki para feedback y solo una persona de la región > interactuó > https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40929650 > > 4) En la primera llamada mensual que se trato el tema Natalia Enciso se > manifestó que conocía a la representante y dio su punto de vista favorable. > > Ante estos hechos me queda solo decirles que considero que la región no ha > indagado en cuestión de averiguar si la asociación acredita o no, (cuestión > que compete también a ALAC), por lo que creo que LACRALO no está en > condiciones de poder brindar un consejo al ALAC. > > Por lo que si en el plazo de 4 días, la región no se manifiesta a favor de > discutir y averiguar sobre la asociación TEDIC, procederé a informar a ALAC > lo manifestado en el presente email, pero sin poder dar un consejo positivo > o negativo, solo información objetiva que se recolecto de las llamadas y de > la wiki. > > Saludos > > José Arce.- > > -- > Arce, José > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > > Arce, Jos _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/823afee3ab.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] The right to forget
by aislan＠uol.com.br May 2, 2013

May 2, 2013

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: The right to forget From: aislan(a)uol.com.br Omar Truth! Even this topic is the subject of my PhD defense course in the UCA. Over time things tend to seren worse. Hugs, Aislan _________________________________________________________________ Em 01/05/2013 21:08, omar(a)kaminski.adv.br escreveu: [[- Translated text (in -> s) -]] Subject: Re: The right to forget From: omar(a)kaminski.adv.br This right to be forgotten is defending at this time because the children and young people who made a lot of problems and the silly things on line. Then they grow and want others to forget all of what they did. Anyway, the information may be located anywhere in the world. Clearing things locaded servers in different jurisdictions? Internet has a memory, and I personally do not agree with this "Right". Think before, the practice of self-censorship. Avoid silly things or be responsible with the results. Omar Carlton Samuels 01/05/2013 <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com&g t; > .....you didn't see me! Who you going to trust? Me or your own two lying > eyes? > > Erasing facts....and re-writing history. Or, just the hagiograph's payday > arrived... > > > = RecG > > -Carlton > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > [2]https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listin fo/lac-discuss-en > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/aa61497c47.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] [lac-discuss-es] El derecho al olvido
by Aislan Vargas Basilio May 2, 2013

May 2, 2013

Verdad Omar! Incluso este tema es el tema de la defensa de mi doctorado que curso en la UCA. Con el tiempo las cosas tienden a seren peores. Â Abrazos, Aislan Â Â Â _________________________________________________________________ Em 01/05/2013 21:08, omar(a)kaminski.adv.br escreveu: [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: El derecho al olvido A partir de: omar(a)kaminski.adv.br Este derecho al olvido se estÃ¡ defendiendo en este momento porque los niÃ±os y los jÃ³venes que hicieron un montÃ³n de problemas y las cosas tontas en lÃnea. Entonces que crecen y quieren que otros olvidan todo el lÃo que hicieron. De todos modos la informaciÃ³n podrÃa estar ubicado en cualquier parte del mundo. CÃ³mo borrar cosas en servidores locaded en las distintas jurisdicciones? Internet tiene memoria, y yo personalmente no estoy de acuerdo con este "derecho". Pensar antes, la prÃ¡ctica de la auto-censura. Evite las cosas tontas o ser responsable con los resultados. Omar 01/05/2013 Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com&g t; > .....you didn't see me! Who you going to trust? Me or your own two lying > eyes? > > Erasing facts....and re-writing history. Or, just the hagiograph's payday > arrived... > > > [1]http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/29/opinion/keller-erasing-history.html?src =recg > > -Carlton > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > [2]https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listin fo/lac-discuss-en > [[--Original text (en) [3]http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1d0c434b48.html --]] References 1. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/29/opinion/keller-erasing-history.html?src=r… 2. https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en 3. http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1d0c434b48.html

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] The right to forget
by aidanoblia＠gmail.com May 2, 2013

May 2, 2013

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: The right to forget From: aidanoblia(a)gmail.com Dear: From what I have learned so far, modestly, the issue is great practical importance today, an when it is difficult to power "Erase" all traces of Internet information that at some point between in the network. Whereupon exercise the right to be forgotten is of difficult application if the information is volcen network. The right to be forgotten can exercise the owner of the data (facts, etc.) that are broadcast on the network, is part of the right to the protection of personal data is governed by certain principles, including that of purpose of the data, informed consent, proportionality, FITNESS. The casustica is extensive. Deleting data from the database may be even harmful to the holder of the data, an in case of sensitive data. If it comes to health data (sensitive data) or schooling or grades in a university, the person that can turn Confa the respective Centre for a certificacinan many years after. In this case the injured will be the holder of the data, who is which also has the right to be forgotten and may not be the case interest in exercise, quite the opposite. The European project an terminde not read, contains limits hope in deletion of the data according to the different purposes. Focusing on the scope of ICANN, the topic will discuss in particular respect to the information contained in the Domain Name Registration, which are determined, appropriate to the purpose of the registry and MUST remain in the registry as the name and then estregistrado eliminated.The applicant shall be the holder of the right to be in the Register and be retired prior relevant trmite. The problem that I understand was considering these registry data is the appropriate limits of Legislation Of its data protection divulgacin, being that is open to the public registry. From what I have seen, the public records provide information various data of people and that is their function, for example in cases of the Registry of Deeds or Automotive, of Attachments. These records also report having data freely, who request it. The purpose for which the information is used and not a registry issue. The function of the Registry is to provide these data. No sensitive data is involved, which are specially protected according The legislation on data protection, but sson personal data. The control prevencino misuse of the data is the subject of another control different. There is a delicate balance between the right of access to information and the right to personal data protection and oblivion. It is complex generally solve because casustica is increasingly wide by complex world. I understand it is more acute in the current stage of the process, an unconsolidated and paradigms in formation, so that is not may have the temporal stability of the above .. Regards - Aida Noblia _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/5969f89a8a.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] The right to forget
by apisan＠unam.mx May 2, 2013

May 2, 2013

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: The right to forget From: apisan(a)unam.mx Carlton, Thank you. Then, the point was where I mention, data domain name registration. I hope members are simultaneously LACRALO experts and whois record, personal data protection and representation of users take this in mind when, in these days, discuss the changes to "whois" and the data model of domain name registration. In developing this model again I think we should make the use cases of the At Large to be part of the design of the new "whois". Now that the election is to be one of our priority issues for their intrinsic importance and because I think estdentro of our capabilities and obligations to users for which we watch. How to use general Internet users data domain name registration? qupodemos answer that question?What is the answer "At Large" differentiated from other types of users? Alejandro Pisanty --------------------------- Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of carlton.samuels @ gmail.com [carlton.samuels @ gmail . com] Posted on: Wednesdays, May 1, 2013 20:50 To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: <whois-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> , At-Large Worldwide Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] The right to oblivion [[- Translated text (in -> s) -]] Subject: Re: The right to forget From: carlton.samuels @ gmail.com Alejandro: You preguntpor queste matter is of importance in the context of ICANN. Um, for a couple of reasons, primarily surrounding the tuition data directory Service, commonly called the WHOIS. RAA 2013 adds one specification of data withholding connected to the domain name registration, but compels the Secretary to the storage recolecciny a specific set of personal data elements for the duration of the registration of a domain name + 2 additional years after that the domain and not sponsored. This disposition gives due recognition to national laws on personal data privacy. In some states, especially in the EU, there is a significant part of the movement to make the 'right to be forgotten' legal consultation framework to the privacy of personal data. That history helps shed more light on the "right to be forgotten cuestinY, hopefully, reading this, to help us think of the data Travs withholding problems WHOIS about in the context of the RAA 2013, with a higher clarity. Best, -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 * Strategy, planning, Government, Evaluation and Turnaround * ============================= On Wednesday, May 1, 2013 at 19:27, <apisan(a)unam.mx> wrote: > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > Subject: Re: The right to forget > From: apisan(a)unam.mx > > Omar, > > > I agree with you in principle. > > > The "right to be forgotten" posed by Viktor Mayer-Schoenberger > in his book "Delete" is the practical application that does not > seem very different from ARCO rights on personal data protection, and > balance with other as the right to information - histrica, for example - > and Esten expresinan freedom of working out. Unfortunately this happens far > more in the fields of courts and data protection authorities in the > community that reflects on Internet. > > > One point can not be overemphasized is that there are many ways to go > around "Oblivion" in its most general terms.Even if they fail to > meet orders to clear a given digital copies of information in electronic > databases, quedarn stakeholders who have done simple things like > screenshots, printouts, or photographs , which may injure someone years > later. The underlying policy problem is the ill will, with some of its > forms as resentment, envy or revenge. > > > I have a discrepancy with Omar in that part of his argument blames the > victims but again I see it as something alien to the "right to be > forgotten" and as part of a more general theme of "understanding > Internet", and policy in different angles. > > > Now, Carlton quviene this mailing list in the ALAC and the LACRALO? in > quforma is steve a problem within the scope of ICANN? May apply versions of > the "right to forget" to register domain names or the IP address > assignment? > > > Alejandro Pisanty > > > > > --------------------------- > Dr.Alejandro Pisanty > Faculty of Chemistry UNAM > 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > > > > > > +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD > > > SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, > http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > > ________________________________________ > From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [ > lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of > omar(a)kaminski.adv.br [omar(a)kaminski.adv . br] > Posted on: Wednesdays, May 1, 2013 19:08 > To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > CC: <whois-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> , > Lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org, At-Large Worldwide > Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] The right to oblivion > > > [[- Translated text (in -> s) -]] > > > Subject: Re: The right to forget > From: omar(a)kaminski.adv.br > > > This right to oblivion estdefendiendo at this time because the children > and young people who made a lot of trouble and the silly things online. > Then > they grow and want others to forget all of what they did. > > > > > Anyway, the information may be located anywhere in the world. How clear > things locaded servers in different jurisdictions? > > > > > Internet has a memory, and I personally do not agree with this > "right". Think > before, the practice of self-censorship. Avoid silly things or be > responsible > with the results. > > > > > Omar > > > > > > > > > Carlton Samuels 01/05/2013 <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> > > > > > > .....you didn't see me! Who you going to trust? Me or your own two lying > > eyes? > > > > Erasing facts....and re-writing history. Or, just the hagiograph's > payday > > arrived... > > > > > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/29/opinion/keller-erasing-history.html?src=r… > > > > -Carlton > > > > ============================== > > Carlton A Samuels > > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > > ============================= > > _______________________________________________ > > lac-discuss-en mailing list > > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > > > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/f5544c68aa.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] The right to forget
by apisan＠unam.mx May 2, 2013

May 2, 2013

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: The right to forget From: apisan(a)unam.mx Omar, I agree with you in principle. The "right to be forgotten" posed by Viktor Mayer-Schoenberger in his book "Delete" is the practical application that does not seem very different from ARCO rights on personal data protection, and balance with other as the right to information - histrica, for example - and Esten expresinan freedom of working out. Unfortunately this happens far more in the fields of courts and data protection authorities in the community that reflects on Internet. One point can not be overemphasized is that there are many ways to go around "Oblivion" in its most general terms.Even if they fail to meet orders to clear a given digital copies of information in electronic databases, quedarn stakeholders who have done simple things like screenshots, printouts, or photographs , which may injure someone years later. The underlying policy problem is the ill will, with some of its forms as resentment, envy or revenge. I have a discrepancy with Omar in that part of his argument blames the victims but again I see it as something alien to the "right to be forgotten" and as part of a more general theme of "understanding Internet", and policy in different angles. Now, Carlton quviene this mailing list in the ALAC and the LACRALO? in quforma is steve a problem within the scope of ICANN? May apply versions of the "right to forget" to register domain names or the IP address assignment? Alejandro Pisanty --------------------------- Dr.Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM 3000 University Avenue, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD SMS +525541444475 +525541444475 FROM MEXICO Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Join the LinkedIn group UNAM, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of omar(a)kaminski.adv.br [omar(a)kaminski.adv . br] Posted on: Wednesdays, May 1, 2013 19:08 To: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: <whois-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> , Lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org, At-Large Worldwide Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] The right to oblivion [[- Translated text (in -> s) -]] Subject: Re: The right to forget From: omar(a)kaminski.adv.br This right to oblivion estdefendiendo at this time because the children and young people who made a lot of trouble and the silly things online. Then they grow and want others to forget all of what they did. Anyway, the information may be located anywhere in the world. How clear things locaded servers in different jurisdictions? Internet has a memory, and I personally do not agree with this "right". Think before, the practice of self-censorship. Avoid silly things or be responsible with the results. Omar Carlton Samuels 01/05/2013 <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> > .....you didn't see me! Who you going to trust? Me or your own two lying > eyes? > > Erasing facts....and re-writing history. Or, just the hagiograph's payday > arrived... > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/29/opinion/keller-erasing-history.html?src=r… > > -Carlton > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/36ba8f8f45.html --]]

3 2

Re: [lac-discuss-en] [lac-discuss-es] El derecho al olvido
by Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch May 2, 2013

May 2, 2013

Omar, coincido contigo en lo fundamental. Del "derecho al olvido" planteado por Viktor Mayer-Schoenberger en su libro "Delete" la aplicación práctica que queda no parece ser muy diferente de los derechos ARCO en la protección de datos personales, y el balance con otros como el derecho a la información - histórica, por ejemplo - y la libertad de expresión aún está en elaboración. Lamentablemente esto pasa ahora más en los ámbitos de tribunales y autoridades de protección de datos que en la comunidad que reflexiona sobre Internet. Un punto que no se puede dejar de enfatizar es que hay muchas formas de dar la vuelta alrededor del "olvido" en sus términos más generales. Incluso si se llegan a cumplir órdenes de borrar copias digitales de una determinada información en bases de datos electrónicas, quedarán partes interesadas que hayan hecho cosas tan simples como capturas de pantalla, impresiones en papel, o fotografías, que puedan lesionar a alguien años más tarde. El problema de ética subyacente es el de la mala voluntad, con algunas de sus formas como el rencor, la envidia o la sed de venganza. Tengo una discrepancia con Omar en que parte de su argumento culpabiliza a las víctimas pero de nuevo lo veo como algo ajeno al propio "derecho al olvido" y como parte de un tema más general de "entender Internet", y de ética en diversos ángulos. Ahora bien, ¿a qué viene este envío de Carlton en la lista de ALAC y en la de LACRALO? ¿en qué forma es éste un problema dentro del ámbito de ICANN? ¿Pueden aplicarse versiones del "derecho al olvido" al registro de nombres de dominio o a la asignación de direcciones IP? Alejandro Pisanty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Química UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________________ Desde: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] en nombre de omar(a)kaminski.adv.br [omar(a)kaminski.adv.br] Enviado el: miércoles, 01 de mayo de 2013 19:08 Hasta: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org CC: <whois-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>; lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Worldwide Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] El derecho al olvido [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] Asunto: Re: El derecho al olvido A partir de: omar(a)kaminski.adv.br Este derecho al olvido se está defendiendo en este momento porque los niños y los jóvenes que hicieron un montón de problemas y las cosas tontas en línea. Entonces que crecen y quieren que otros olvidan todo el lío que hicieron. De todos modos la información podría estar ubicado en cualquier parte del mundo. Cómo borrar cosas en servidores locaded en las distintas jurisdicciones? Internet tiene memoria, y yo personalmente no estoy de acuerdo con este "derecho". Pensar antes, la práctica de la auto-censura. Evite las cosas tontas o ser responsable con los resultados. Omar 01/05/2013 Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> > .....you didn't see me! Who you going to trust? Me or your own two lying > eyes? > > Erasing facts....and re-writing history. Or, just the hagiograph's payday > arrived... > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/29/opinion/keller-erasing-history.html?src=r… > > -Carlton > > ============================== > Carlton A Samuels > Mobile: 876-818-1799 > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* > ============================= > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-en mailing list > lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en > [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1d0c434b48.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: ICANN News Alert -- Fellowship Application Round Opens for ICANN 48 in Buenos Aires, Argentina
by Fatima Cambronero May 1, 2013

May 1, 2013

FYI, ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: ICANN News Alert <communications(a)icann.org> Date: 2013/5/1 Subject: ICANN News Alert -- Fellowship Application Round Opens for ICANN 48 in Buenos Aires, Argentina To: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com ** [image: ICANN] <http://www.icann.org/> News Alert http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-01may13-en.htm ------------------------------ Fellowship Application Round Opens for ICANN 48 in Buenos Aires, Argentina 1 May 2013 How Do I Apply for the Fellowship Program The Fellowship Program has demonstrated success in its mission to build capacity in the ICANN multi-stakeholder environment through focused interactive engagement between newcomers to ICANN and community members at each of the ICANN meetings. The program seeks to identify members of the Internet community who either have not previously been able to participate in ICANN processes and constituent organizations, or those who require further exposure to the Internet community and its work but cannot travel and attend a meeting without financial support. This outreach program seeks participants from developing regions and countries of the world, in order to help create a broader base of knowledgeable constituents who will become the new voice of experience in their regions and beyond. Applications to become an ICANN Fellow are assessed for each meeting by an independent selection committee. Priority is given to applicants who: meet minimum program requirements; are current residents of developing and least developed nations; and are interested in participating in the ICANN multi-stakeholder process and its supporting organizations, advisory committees or stakeholder groups. An effort will be made to include participants from the African region as it is the site of this ICANN meeting. All confirmed fellowship participants must comply with the terms and conditions of the Fellowship program, as outlined at http://www.icann.org/en/about/participate/fellowships/terms-conditions. As stated within these terms and conditions, ICANN is a California non-profit public benefit corporation and must therefore comply with all the laws and regulations of California and the United States. Fellows are responsible for obtaining all travel visas once accepted into the program. ICANN will purchase tickets for Fellows after all necessary documentation has been obtained and Fellows demonstrate that they have obtained all necessary travel visas. Once all of the requirements for travel are met, the Fellowship program arranges for and covers the costs for airfare and hotel, as well as providing a stipend to assist with some meeting and subsistence costs. The stipend is provided after each selected candidate successfully completes the requirements of the Fellowship program, Recipients will be expected to actively participate in and contribute to ICANN processes during and after the meeting. As always, registration for ICANN's meetings is free for anyone wanting to attend. Find out more » <http://www.icann.org/en/about/participate/fellowships> This message was sent to fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com from: ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Email Marketing by [image: iContact - Try It Free!]<http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186> Manage Your Subscription <http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=13227880&l=6333&s=RZZO&m=91…> -- *Fatima Cambronero* Abogada-Argentina Phone: +54 9351 5282 668 Twitter: @facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero *Join the LACRALO/ICANN discussions:* https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es *Join the Diplo Internet Governance Community discussions:* http://www.diplointernetgovernance.org/ *Join to the Internet Society (ISOC): *http://www.internetsociety.org/

1 0

Fwd: ICANN News Alert -- Proposed Final New gTLD Registry Agreement
by Carlton Samuels May 1, 2013

May 1, 2013

FYI. This baseline agreement is of heightened importance to the At-Large brief, especially in context of the decision that all new gTLD registries must follow the 'thick' model. -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= ** [image: ICANN] <http://www.icann.org/> News Alert http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-29apr13-en.htm ------------------------------ Proposed Final New gTLD Registry Agreement 29 April 2013 *Forum Announcement:* Comment Period Opens on *Date:* 29 April 2013 * Categories/Tags:* Top-Level Domains *Purpose (Brief):* ICANN is seeking public comment on a revised draft of the New gTLD Registry Agreement that will serve as the contractual document between successful New gTLD Applicants and ICANN, and will govern the rights and obligations of new gTLD registry operators. ICANN has made certain updates and changes to the New gTLD Registry Agreement in response to community feedback on the version of the New gTLD Registry Agreement posted for public comment on 5 February 2013 and discussions of the New gTLD Registry Agreement at the ICANN 46 meeting in Beijing, China 7-11 April 2013. *Public Comment Box Link:* http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/base-agreement-29apr13-en.htm

1 0