October 2015 - lac-discuss-en

Motion of No Confidence / Voto de censura
by José Ovidio Salgueiro Oct. 19, 2015

Oct. 19, 2015

Increible!!!! Nos someten a este proceso y Carlton Samuels, quien lo propuso, ni siquiere se toma el trabajo de votar Amazing!!!! We go throuht this and Carlton Samuels, who proposes the motion desn´t even care to vote -- José Ovidio Salgueiro A. salgueiro.jo(a)gmail.com

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ??? Q = utf-8 meeting TODAY _-_ = C3 = B3n _ / _ LACRALO_F2F_Invit = = utf-8 b YWNpw7NuIFJldW5pw7NuIGVuIER1YmzDrW4 = =?????
by alyne.ibdi＠gmail.com Oct. 19, 2015

Oct. 19, 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:??? Q = utf-8 meeting TODAY _-_ = C3 = B3n _ / _ LACRALO_F2F_Invit = = utf-8 b YWNpw7NuIFJldW5pw7NuIGVuIER1YmzDrW4 = =????? From: alyne.ibdi(a)gmail.com Dear, I can not participate in reuniões that of hot and because I will be trabalhando. Sorry, Alyne. Em second-feira, 19 octobre 2015 <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> escreveu: > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto: HOY - reuniÃ³n / LACRALO F2F InvitaciÃ³n ReuniÃ³n en DublÃn > De: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <javascript:;> > > > > Queridos todos, > > > > > > > La teleconferencia mensual prÃ³xima LACRALO estÃ¡ programado para llevarse > a cabo F2F en DublÃn el lunes 19 octubre 2015, desde las 15: 30-16: 30 hora > local (14: 30-15: 30 GMT) en Wicklow H1, durante la ICANN 54 ReuniÃ³n en > DublÃn > > > Para otras veces: > http://tinyurl.com/ndwenez > > > La agenda y llamadas detalles estÃ¡n disponibles en: > https://community.icann.org/x/FadYAw > > > Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/dub54-wicklowhall1/ > > > La participaciÃ³n a distancia: > RECORDATORIO para los participantes a distancia: Si desea hablar durante > la reuniÃ³n, marque en el puente de audio. Los detalles estÃ¡n disponibles > aquÃ en adelante: > Dial-in nÃºmeros: http://adigo.com/icann/ > Conferencia ID: 1638 > > > Si desea sÃ³lo para escuchar la reuniÃ³n, por favor, siga bien a travÃ©s de: > > > * Streaming de audio en ESPAÃOL > > > https://meetings.icann.org/en/dublin54/schedule/mon-lacralo > > > Haga click en la secuencia de audio en vivo en su idioma > > > * O unirse a la sala de Adobe Connect: < > https://icann.adobeconnect.com/dub54-wicklowhall1> Virtual Sala de > reuniones Live Stream < > https://icann.adobeconnect.com/dub54-wicklowhall1> < > https://icann.adobeconnect.com/dub54-wicklowhall1> > > > Si necesita una llamada de salida, por favor escriba > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <javascript:;> <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org > <javascript:;>> . > > > Gracias. > > > Saludos, > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > Peregrine y Terri Agnew > El personal de ICANN polÃtica en apoyo de ALAC > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <javascript:;> <mailto: > staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <javascript:;>> > Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann.atlarge < > https://www.facebook.com/icann.atlarge> > Twitter:ICANN_AtLarge < https://twitter.com/ICANN_AtLarge> > > > Un mundo, una Internet > > > > > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/db1061979e.html --]]

1 0

TODAY - Meeting Invitation / LACRALO F2F meeting in Buenos Aires
by ICANN At-Large Staff Oct. 19, 2015

Oct. 19, 2015

Dear All, The next LACRALO monthly teleconference is scheduled to take place F2F in Dublin on Monday 19 October 2015 from 15:30-16:30 local time (14:30-15:30 UTC) in Wicklow H1, during the ICANN 54 Meeting in Dublin For other times: http://tinyurl.com/ndwenez The agenda and call details are available at: https://community.icann.org/x/FadYAw Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/dub54-wicklowhall1/ Remote Participation: REMINDER for Remote Participants: If you wish to speak during the meeting, please dial into the audio bridge. Details are available hereafter: Dial-in numbers: http://adigo.com/icann/ Conference ID: 1638 If you ONLY wish to LISTEN to the meeting, please follow either via: * audio streaming in SPANISH https://meetings.icann.org/en/dublin54/schedule/mon-lacralo Click on Audio Stream live in your language * Or Join the Adobe Connect room: <https://icann.adobeconnect.com/dub54-wicklowhall1> Virtual Meeting Room Stream Live<https://icann.adobeconnect.com/dub54-wicklowhall1> <https://icann.adobeconnect.com/dub54-wicklowhall1> (Wicklow H1) - AC audio in English If you require a dial-out, please email staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>. Thank you. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann.atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icann.atlarge> Twitter: @ICANN_AtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANN_AtLarge> One World, One Internet

1 0

CORRECTION - VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO First Vote on the Motion of No Confidence / First LACRALO vote on the censure motion
by staff＠atlarge.icann.org Oct. 18, 2015

Oct. 18, 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: CORRECTION - VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO First Vote on the Motion of No Confidence / First LACRALO vote on the censure motion From: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org Dear All, Please be so kind to note That the First Vote With regard to the Proposed Motion of No Confidence by Carlton Samuels is now completed. The voting process was Governed by rules 12, 19 and 20 of LACRALO's RoP. Concerning the Proposed resolution, the following question was Asked in the First Vote: *** QUESTION: Do you believe LACRALO That is competent to vote a motion of no confidence? 1. Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward. 2. No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored. Of the total of 47 ALS In This voting process, ALS Voted 28 (equivalent to 58.89% of the total weight). The minimum quorum requirement was 24 ALS. Option YES = 7 votes equivalent to 13.61% of the total weight. Option NO = 21 votes equivalent to 45.28% of the total weight. Abstentions to vote = 19 votes equivalent to 41.11% of the total weight. ACCORDING TO RULE 12.2, At Large Structures abstaining from voting Shall Be Regarded as Having Voted not. Poll As at close: Friday 16 October 2015 23:00 UTC Number of voters: 28 Group size: 47 Percentage Voted: 58.89 of the total weight Ranked by votes Rank Options Weighted Votes % You votes % Voters 1 No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the censorship mocin be ignored 4531.0000 76.87 21 75.00 Olvidio Jose Salgueiro (W167), Adrian Carballo (W56), Monica Abalo Laforgia (W56), Javier Eduardo Rojas Chandia (W250), Dr.Basilio Vargas isolated (W125), Sergio Salinas Porto Walter (W56), Cristian Casas (W56), Alberto Soto (W56), Jose Luis Barzallo (W125), Gilberto Lara (w500), Ana Maria Moreno (W167), Diego Acosta Bastidas (W125), Aida Noblia (w500), Humberto Carrasco (W250), Alejandro Pisanty (w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas (w500), Alyne Andrade (W125), Mario Aleman (w500), Harold Arcos (W167), Vanda Scartezini (W125), Sylvia Leite Herlein (W125) 2 Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / Yes, censorship should proceed mocin 1363.0000 23.13 7 25.00 Antonio Medina Gomez (W167), Juan Manuel Rojas P (W167), Fatima Cambronero (W56), Jose Arce (W56), Maricarmen Buzarquis Sequera (W250), Ricardo Holmquist (W167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez (w500) *** As per instruction published on the Next Steps Regarding the Motion of No Confidence < https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>, You May Independently check the vote result under: < https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q> https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q ES == == Hello everyone, Please note that the first vote on the censure mocin proposed by Mr. Carlton Samuels has been completed. The voting process estargobernado under rules 12, 19 and 20 of the Rules of Procedure of LACRALO. With relacina the resolution proposal, the following is the question of First Vote: *** QUESTION: You believe that LACRALO is competent to vote on the censure mocin? 1. If the mocin censorship should proceed. 2. No, the censorship mocin be ignored. Of the total of 47 ALSes in this process of ballot, they voted ALSes 28 (equivalent to 58.89% of the total weight). The minimum required quorum is 24 ALSes. Option SI - 7 equivalents to 13.61% of the total weight Votes. Option NO - 21 equivalent to 45.28% of the total weight Votes. Abstentions by voting = 19 votes equivalent to 41.11% of the total weight. According to Rule 12.2, the structures that abstain from voting are considered as not having voted. Upon closing the ballot: Friday October 16 2015, 23 UTC. Number of votes: 28. Tamao group: Voters 47. Percentage: 58.89 total weight Votes position Options Position Options Weighted votes % Votes % Voters 1 No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the censorship mocin be ignored 4531.0000 76.87 21 75.00 Olvidio Jose Salgueiro (W167), Adrian Carballo (W56), Monica Abalo Laforgia (W56), Javier Eduardo Rojas Chandia (W250), Dr. Aislan Basilio Vargas (W125), Sergio Salinas Porto Walter (W56), Cristian Casas ( W56), Alberto Soto (W56), Jose Luis Barzallo (W125), Gilberto Lara (w500), Ana Maria Moreno (W167), Diego Acosta Bastidas (W125), Aida Noblia (w500), Humberto Carrasco (W250), Alejandro Pisanty (w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas (w500), Alyne Andrade (W125), Mario Aleman (w500), Harold Arcos (W167), Vanda Scartezini (W125), Sylvia Leite Herlein (W125) 2 Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / Yes, censorship should proceed mocin 1363.0000 23.13 7 25.00 Antonio Medina Gomez (W167), Juan Manuel Rojas P (W167), Fatima Cambronero (W56), Jose Arce (W56), Maricarmen Buzarquis Sequera (W250), Ricardo Holmquist (W167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez (w500) *** According to the instructions issued in the following steps about censorship mocin < https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>, You can review the results independently under: < https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q> https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Facebook: < https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> www.facebook.com/icann <http://www.facebook.com/icann> AtLarge < https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @ < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/0369f1045c.html --]]

1 0

CORRECTION - VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO First Vote on the Motion of No Confidence / Primer voto de LACRALO sobre la mocion de censura
by ICANN At-Large Staff Oct. 18, 2015

Oct. 18, 2015

Dear All, Please be so kind to note that the First Vote with regard to the Motion of No Confidence proposed by Carlton Samuels is now completed. The voting process was governed by rules 12, 19 and 20 of LACRALO's RoP. Concerning the proposed resolution, the following question was asked in the First Vote: *** QUESTION: Do you believe that LACRALO is competent to vote a motion of no confidence? 1. Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward. 2. No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored. Of the total of 47 ALSs in this voting process, 28 ALSs voted (equivalent to 58,89% of total weight). The minimum quorum requirement was 24 ALSs. Option YES =7 votes equivalent to 13.61% of total weight. Option NO = 21 votes equivalent to 45.28% of total weight. Abstentions to vote = 19 votes equivalent to 41.11% of total weight. According to rule 12.2, At Large Structures abstaining from voting shall be regarded as having not voted. As at Poll close: Friday 16 October 2015 23:00 UTC Number of voters: 28· Group size: 47 · Percentage voted: 58.89 of total weight Ranked by votes Rank Options Weighted Votes % Votes % Voters 1 No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the moción de censura debe ser ignorada 4,531.0000 76.87 21 75.00 Jose Olvidio Salgueiro(w167), Adrian Carballo(w56), Mónica Abalo Laforgia(w56), Javier Eduardo Chandia Rojas(w250), Dr. Aislan Vargas Basilio(w125), Sergio Walter Salinas Porto(w56), Cristian Casas(w56), Alberto Soto(w56), Jose Luis Barzallo(w125), Gilberto Lara(w500), Ana Maria Moreno(w167), Diego Acosta Bastidas(w125), Aida Noblia(w500), Humberto Carrasco(w250), Alejandro Pisanty(w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas(w500), Alyne Andrade(w125), Mario Aleman(w500), Harold Arcos(w167), Vanda Scartezini(w125), Sylvia Herlein Leite(w125) 2 Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / Si, la moción de censura debe proceder 1,363.0000 23.13 7 25.00 Antonio Medina Gomez(w167), Juan Manuel Rojas P(w167), Fatima Cambronero(w56), Jose Arce(w56), Maricarmen Sequera Buzarquis(w250), Ricardo Holmquist(w167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez(w500) *** As per instruction published on the Next Steps regarding the Motion of No Confidence<https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>, the proposed amendment and Mr. Samuels' motion of no confidence must be ignored. You may check the vote result independently under: <https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q> https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q == ES == Hola a todos, Por favor notar que el primer voto sobre la moción de censura propuesta por el Sr. Carlton Samuels se ha completado. El proceso de voto estará gobernado por las reglas 12, 19, y 20 de las Reglas de Procedimiento de LACRALO. Con relación a la resolución propuesta, la siguiente es la pregunta del Primer voto: *** PREGUNTA: ¿Usted cree que LACRALO tiene competencia para votar la moción de censura? 1. Si, la moción de censura debe proceder. 2. No, the moción de censura debe ser ignorada. Del total de 47 ALSes en este proceso de votación, 28 ALSes votaron (equivalente al 58,89% del peso total). El mínimo quorum requerido es 24 ALses. Opción SI - 7 Votos equivalentes al 13,61% del peso total. Opción NO - 21 Votos equivalentes al 45,28% del peso total. Abstenciones al votar = 19 votos equivalentes al 41,11 % del peso total. De acuerdo a la regla 12.2, las estructuras que se abstengan de votar se consideraran como si no hubieran votado. Al momento de cerrar la votación: Viernes 16 de Octubre 2015, 23 UTC. Número de votos: 28. Tamaño del grupo: 47. Porcentaje votado: 58.89 del peso total Posición Opciones Votos Posición Opciones Votos tabuladas % Votos % Votantes 1 No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the moción de censura debe ser ignorada 4,531.0000 76.87 21 75.00 Jose Olvidio Salgueiro(w167), Adrian Carballo(w56), Mónica Abalo Laforgia(w56), Javier Eduardo Chandia Rojas(w250), Dr. Aislan Vargas Basilio(w125), Sergio Walter Salinas Porto(w56), Cristian Casas(w56), Alberto Soto(w56), Jose Luis Barzallo(w125), Gilberto Lara(w500), Ana Maria Moreno(w167), Diego Acosta Bastidas(w125), Aida Noblia(w500), Humberto Carrasco(w250), Alejandro Pisanty(w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas(w500), Alyne Andrade(w125), Mario Aleman(w500), Harold Arcos(w167), Vanda Scartezini(w125), Sylvia Herlein Leite(w125) 2 Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / Si, la moción de censura debe proceder 1,363.0000 23.13 7 25.00 Antonio Medina Gomez(w167), Juan Manuel Rojas P(w167), Fatima Cambronero(w56), Jose Arce(w56), Maricarmen Sequera Buzarquis(w250), Ricardo Holmquist(w167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez(w500) *** De acuerdo a las instrucciones publicadas en los Siguientes pasos acerca de la moción de censura<https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>, la enmienda propuesta y la moción de censura del Sr. Samuels será ignorada. Puede revisar los resultados independientemente bajo: <https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q> https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Facebook: <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> www.facebook.com/icann<http://www.facebook.com/icann>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / LACRALO vote on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org Oct. 18, 2015

Oct. 18, 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / LACRALO vote on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty From: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org Dear Alexander, immediately received pedi correction. Cheers Alberto Soto From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] In the name of Alejandro Pisanty Posted on: Sunday, October 18, 2015 24:14 To: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> CC: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / LACRALO vote on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty Hi, Does not Reflect the subject motion.This is not a vote on a motion I Proposed. In fact energically I disassociate myself from the motion as proven by my vote Against It. It is remarkable Also That the person (s) Who Moved for no confidence did not vote. The subject does not reflect the motion. This vote does not refer to a motion that I've driven. In fact I strongly disassociate the motion as evidenced by my vote. It is also notable that (s) person (s9 prompted (aron) the censure motion did not vote. Alejandro Pisanty Alejandro Pisanty 18/10/2015 10:08 GMT-05: 00 ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> >: Dear All, Please be so kind to note That the First Vote With regard to the Proposed Motion of No Confidence by Carlton Samuels is now completed. The voting process was Governed by rules 12, 19 and 20 of LACRALO's RoP. Concerning the Proposed resolution, the following question was Asked in the First Vote: *** QUESTION: Do you believe LACRALO That is competent to vote a motion of no confidence? 1. Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward. 2. No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored. Of the total of 47 ALS In This voting process, ALS Voted 28 (equivalent to 58.89% of the total weight). The minimum quorum requirement was 24 ALS. Option YES = 7 votes equivalent to 13.61% of the total weight. Option NO = 21 votes equivalent to 45.28% of the total weight. Abstentions to vote = 19 votes equivalent to 41.11% of the total weight. ACCORDING TO RULE 12.2, At Large Structures abstaining from voting Shall Be Regarded as Having Voted not. Poll As at close: Friday 16 October 2015 23:00 UTC Number of voters: 28 · Group size: 47 · Percentage Voted: 58.89 of the total weight Ranked by votes Rank Options Weighted Votes % You votes % Voters 1 No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the motion of censure should be ignored 4531.0000 76.87 21 75.00 Olvidio Jose Salgueiro (W167), Adrian Carballo (W56), Monica Abalo Laforgia (W56), Javier Eduardo Rojas Chandia (W250), Dr.Basilio Vargas isolated (W125), Sergio Salinas Porto Walter (W56), Cristian Casas (W56), Alberto Soto (W56), Jose Luis Barzallo (W125), Gilberto Lara (w500), Ana Maria Moreno (W167), Diego Acosta Bastidas (W125), Aida Noblia (w500), Humberto Carrasco (W250), Alejandro Pisanty (w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas (w500), Alyne Andrade (W125), Mario Aleman (w500), Harold Arcos (W167), Vanda Scartezini (W125), Sylvia Leite Herlein (W125) 2 Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / If the censure motion should proceed 1363.0000 23.13 7 25.00 Antonio Medina Gomez (W167), Juan Manuel Rojas P (W167), Fatima Cambronero (W56), Jose Arce (W56), Maricarmen Buzarquis Sequera (W250), Ricardo Holmquist (W167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez (w500) *** As per instruction published on the < https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw> You May Independently check the vote result under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q ES == == Hello everyone, Please note that the first vote on the censure motion proposed by Mr. Carlton Samuels has been completed. The voting process will be governed by rules 12, 19, and 20 of the Rules of Procedure of LACRALO. With regard to the proposed resolution, the following is the question First Vote: *** QUESTION: Do you think that LACRALO is competent to vote on the motion of censure? 1. If the censure motion should proceed. 2. No, the motion of censure should be ignored. Of the total of 47 ALSes in the process of voting, 28 voted ALSes (equivalent to 58.89% of the total weight). The minimum required quorum is 24 ALSes. Option SI - 7 equivalents to 13.61% of the total weight Votes. Option NO - 21 votes equivalent to 45.28% of the total weight. Abstentions by voting = 19 votes equivalent to 41.11% of the total weight. According to Rule 12.2, the structures that abstain from voting are considered as not having voted. When closing the vote: Friday October 16 2015, 23 UTC. Total Votes: 28. Group size: 47. Percentage voted: 58.89 total weight Votes position Options Position Options Weighted votes % Votes % Voters 1 No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the motion of censure should be ignored 4531.0000 76.87 21 75.00 Olvidio Jose Salgueiro (W167), Adrian Carballo (W56), Monica Abalo Laforgia (W56), Javier Eduardo Rojas Chandia (W250), Dr. Aislan Basilio Vargas (W125), Sergio Salinas Porto Walter (W56), Cristian Casas (W56) Alberto Soto (W56), Jose Luis Barzallo (W125), Gilberto Lara (w500), Ana Maria Moreno (W167), Diego Acosta Bastidas (W125), Aida Noblia (w500), Humberto Carrasco (W250), Alejandro Pisanty (w500 ), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas (w500), Alyne Andrade (W125), Mario Aleman (w500), Harold Arcos (W167), Vanda Scartezini (W125), Sylvia Leite Herlein (W125) 2 Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / If the censure motion should proceed 1363.0000 23.13 7 25.00 Antonio Medina Gomez (W167), Juan Manuel Rojas P (W167), Fatima Cambronero (W56), Jose Arce (W56), Maricarmen Buzarquis Sequera (W250), Ricardo Holmquist (W167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez (w500) *** According to the instructions issued in the following steps on the motion of censure < https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw> You can review the results independently under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <http://www.facebook.com/icann> < https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> @ < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/2a6d019498.html --]]

1 0

VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / Voto de LACRALO sobre la Mocion propuesta por Alejandro Pisanty
by ICANN At-Large Staff Oct. 18, 2015

Oct. 18, 2015

Dear All, Please be so kind to note that the First Vote with regard to the Motion of No Confidence proposed by Carlton Samuels is now completed. The voting process was governed by rules 12, 19 and 20 of LACRALO's RoP. Concerning the proposed resolution, the following question was asked in the First Vote: *** QUESTION: Do you believe that LACRALO is competent to vote a motion of no confidence? 1. Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward. 2. No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored. Of the total of 47 ALSs in this voting process, 28 ALSs voted (equivalent to 58,89% of total weight). The minimum quorum requirement was 24 ALSs. Option YES =7 votes equivalent to 13.61% of total weight. Option NO = 21 votes equivalent to 45.28% of total weight. Abstentions to vote = 19 votes equivalent to 41.11% of total weight. According to rule 12.2, At Large Structures abstaining from voting shall be regarded as having not voted. As at Poll close: Friday 16 October 2015 23:00 UTC Number of voters: 28· Group size: 47 · Percentage voted: 58.89 of total weight Ranked by votes Rank Options Weighted Votes % Votes % Voters 1 No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the moción de censura debe ser ignorada 4,531.0000 76.87 21 75.00 Jose Olvidio Salgueiro(w167), Adrian Carballo(w56), Mónica Abalo Laforgia(w56), Javier Eduardo Chandia Rojas(w250), Dr. Aislan Vargas Basilio(w125), Sergio Walter Salinas Porto(w56), Cristian Casas(w56), Alberto Soto(w56), Jose Luis Barzallo(w125), Gilberto Lara(w500), Ana Maria Moreno(w167), Diego Acosta Bastidas(w125), Aida Noblia(w500), Humberto Carrasco(w250), Alejandro Pisanty(w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas(w500), Alyne Andrade(w125), Mario Aleman(w500), Harold Arcos(w167), Vanda Scartezini(w125), Sylvia Herlein Leite(w125) 2 Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / Si, la moción de censura debe proceder 1,363.0000 23.13 7 25.00 Antonio Medina Gomez(w167), Juan Manuel Rojas P(w167), Fatima Cambronero(w56), Jose Arce(w56), Maricarmen Sequera Buzarquis(w250), Ricardo Holmquist(w167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez(w500) *** As per instruction published on the Next Steps regarding the Motion of No Confidence<https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>, the proposed amendment and Mr. Samuels' motion of no confidence must be ignored. You may check the vote result independently under: <https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q> https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q == ES == Hola a todos, Por favor notar que el primer voto sobre la moción de censura propuesta por el Sr. Carlton Samuels se ha completado. El proceso de voto estará gobernado por las reglas 12, 19, y 20 de las Reglas de Procedimiento de LACRALO. Con relación a la resolución propuesta, la siguiente es la pregunta del Primer voto: *** PREGUNTA: ¿Usted cree que LACRALO tiene competencia para votar la moción de censura? 1. Si, la moción de censura debe proceder. 2. No, the moción de censura debe ser ignorada. Del total de 47 ALSes en este proceso de votación, 28 ALSes votaron (equivalente al 58,89% del peso total). El mínimo quorum requerido es 24 ALses. Opción SI - 7 Votos equivalentes al 13,61% del peso total. Opción NO - 21 Votos equivalentes al 45,28% del peso total. Abstenciones al votar = 19 votos equivalentes al 41,11 % del peso total. De acuerdo a la regla 12.2, las estructuras que se abstengan de votar se consideraran como si no hubieran votado. Al momento de cerrar la votación: Viernes 16 de Octubre 2015, 23 UTC. Número de votos: 28. Tamaño del grupo: 47. Porcentaje votado: 58.89 del peso total Posición Opciones Votos Posición Opciones Votos tabuladas % Votos % Votantes 1 No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the moción de censura debe ser ignorada 4,531.0000 76.87 21 75.00 Jose Olvidio Salgueiro(w167), Adrian Carballo(w56), Mónica Abalo Laforgia(w56), Javier Eduardo Chandia Rojas(w250), Dr. Aislan Vargas Basilio(w125), Sergio Walter Salinas Porto(w56), Cristian Casas(w56), Alberto Soto(w56), Jose Luis Barzallo(w125), Gilberto Lara(w500), Ana Maria Moreno(w167), Diego Acosta Bastidas(w125), Aida Noblia(w500), Humberto Carrasco(w250), Alejandro Pisanty(w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas(w500), Alyne Andrade(w125), Mario Aleman(w500), Harold Arcos(w167), Vanda Scartezini(w125), Sylvia Herlein Leite(w125) 2 Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / Si, la moción de censura debe proceder 1,363.0000 23.13 7 25.00 Antonio Medina Gomez(w167), Juan Manuel Rojas P(w167), Fatima Cambronero(w56), Jose Arce(w56), Maricarmen Sequera Buzarquis(w250), Ricardo Holmquist(w167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez(w500) *** De acuerdo a las instrucciones publicadas en los Siguientes pasos acerca de la moción de censura<https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>, la enmienda propuesta y la moción de censura del Sr. Samuels será ignorada. Puede revisar los resultados independientemente bajo: <https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q> https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Facebook: <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> www.facebook.com/icann<http://www.facebook.com/icann>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>

3 2

IT WILL SHORTLY BE CORRECTED VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / LACRALO vote on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty
by silvia.vivanco＠icann.org Oct. 18, 2015

Oct. 18, 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: IT WILL SHORTLY BE CORRECTED VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / LACRALO vote on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty From: silvia.vivanco(a)icann.org Hello Alexander, The heading of esta email is wrong. Apologies for esta mistake, staff will send the email With the correct heading. Kind regards, Silvia Silvia Vivanco Manager, At-Large Regional Affairs ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org/> From: Alejandro Pisanty [mailto: apisanty(a)gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 4:14 PM To: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Cc: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / LACRALO vote on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty Hi, Does not Reflect the subject motion. This is not a vote on a motion I Proposed. In fact energically I disassociate myself from the motion as proven by my vote Against It. It is remarkable Also That the person (s) Who Moved for no confidence did not vote. The subject does not reflect the motion. This vote does not refer to a motion that I've driven. In fact I strongly disassociate the motion as evidenced by my vote. It is also notable that (s) person (s9 prompted (aron) the censure motion did not vote. Alejandro Pisanty Alejandro Pisanty 18/10/2015 10:08 GMT-05: 00 ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> >: Dear All, Please be so kind to note That the First Vote With regard to the Proposed Motion of No Confidence by Carlton Samuels is now completed. The voting process was Governed by rules 12, 19 and 20 of LACRALO's RoP. Concerning the Proposed resolution, the following question was Asked in the First Vote: *** QUESTION: Do you believe LACRALO That is competent to vote a motion of no confidence? 1. Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward. 2. No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored. Of the total of 47 ALS In This voting process, ALS Voted 28 (equivalent to 58.89% of the total weight). The minimum quorum requirement was 24 ALS. Option YES = 7 votes equivalent to 13.61% of the total weight. Option NO = 21 votes equivalent to 45.28% of the total weight. Abstentions to vote = 19 votes equivalent to 41.11% of the total weight. ACCORDING TO RULE 12.2, At Large Structures abstaining from voting Shall Be Regarded as Having Voted not. Poll As at close: Friday 16 October 2015 23:00 UTC Number of voters: 28 · Group size: 47 · Percentage Voted: 58.89 of the total weight Ranked by votes Rank Options Weighted Votes % You votes % Voters 1 No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the motion of censure should be ignored 4531.0000 76.87 21 75.00 Olvidio Jose Salgueiro (W167), Adrian Carballo (W56), Monica Abalo Laforgia (W56), Javier Eduardo Rojas Chandia (W250), Dr.Basilio Vargas isolated (W125), Sergio Salinas Porto Walter (W56), Cristian Casas (W56), Alberto Soto (W56), Jose Luis Barzallo (W125), Gilberto Lara (w500), Ana Maria Moreno (W167), Diego Acosta Bastidas (W125), Aida Noblia (w500), Humberto Carrasco (W250), Alejandro Pisanty (w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas (w500), Alyne Andrade (W125), Mario Aleman (w500), Harold Arcos (W167), Vanda Scartezini (W125), Sylvia Leite Herlein (W125) 2 Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / If the censure motion should proceed 1363.0000 23.13 7 25.00 Antonio Medina Gomez (W167), Juan Manuel Rojas P (W167), Fatima Cambronero (W56), Jose Arce (W56), Maricarmen Buzarquis Sequera (W250), Ricardo Holmquist (W167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez (w500) *** As per instruction published on the Next Steps Regarding the Motion of No Confidence < https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>, You May Independently check the vote result under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q ES == == Hello everyone, Please note that the first vote on the censure motion proposed by Mr. Carlton Samuels has been completed. The voting process will be governed by rules 12, 19, and 20 of the Rules of Procedure of LACRALO. With regard to the proposed resolution, the following is the question First Vote: *** QUESTION: Do you think that LACRALO is competent to vote on the motion of censure? 1. If the censure motion should proceed. 2. No, the motion of censure should be ignored. Of the total of 47 ALSes in the process of voting, 28 voted ALSes (equivalent to 58.89% of the total weight). The minimum required quorum is 24 ALSes. Option SI - 7 equivalents to 13.61% of the total weight Votes. Option NO - 21 votes equivalent to 45.28% of the total weight. Abstentions by voting = 19 votes equivalent to 41.11% of the total weight. According to Rule 12.2, the structures that abstain from voting are considered as not having voted. When closing the vote: Friday October 16 2015, 23 UTC. Total Votes: 28. Group size: 47. Percentage voted: 58.89 total weight Votes position Options Position Options Weighted votes % Votes % Voters 1 No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the motion of censure should be ignored 4531.0000 76.87 21 75.00 Olvidio Jose Salgueiro (W167), Adrian Carballo (W56), Monica Abalo Laforgia (W56), Javier Eduardo Rojas Chandia (W250), Dr.Basilio Vargas isolated (W125), Sergio Salinas Porto Walter (W56), Cristian Casas (W56), Alberto Soto (W56), Jose Luis Barzallo (W125), Gilberto Lara (w500), Ana Maria Moreno (W167), Diego Acosta Bastidas (W125), Aida Noblia (w500), Humberto Carrasco (W250), Alejandro Pisanty (w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas (w500), Alyne Andrade (W125), Mario Aleman (w500), Harold Arcos (W167), Vanda Scartezini (W125), Sylvia Leite Herlein (W125) 2 Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / If the censure motion should proceed 1363.0000 23.13 7 25.00 Antonio Medina Gomez (W167), Juan Manuel Rojas P (W167), Fatima Cambronero (W56), Jose Arce (W56), Maricarmen Buzarquis Sequera (W250), Ricardo Holmquist (W167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez (w500) *** According to the instructions issued in the following steps on the motion of censure < https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>, You can review the results independently under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann <http://www.facebook.com/icann> AtLarge < https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @ < https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM Faculty of Chemistry Av.University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3358ac8d41.html --]]

1 0

IT WILL BE CORRECTED SHORTLY VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / Voto de LACRALO sobre la Mocion propuesta por Alejandro Pisanty
by Silvia Vivanco Oct. 18, 2015

Oct. 18, 2015

Hello Alejandro, The heading of this email is wrong. Apologies for this mistake, staff will send the email with the correct heading. Kind regards, Silvia Silvia Vivanco Manager, At Large Regional Affairs ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org/> From: Alejandro Pisanty [mailto:apisanty@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 4:14 PM To: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> Cc: lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / Voto de LACRALO sobre la Mocion propuesta por Alejandro Pisanty Hi, subject doesn't reflect the motion. This is not a vote on a motion I proposed. In fact I energically disassociate myself from the motion as proven by my vote against it. It is also remarkable that the person(s) who moved for no confidence did not vote. El asunto no refleja la moción. Este voto no se refiere a una moción que yo haya impulsado. De hecho me desasocio enérgicamente de la moción como lo prueba mi voto en contra. También es notable que la(s) persona(s9 que impulsó(aron) la moción de censura no votaron. Alejandro Pisanty Alejandro Pisanty 2015-10-18 10:08 GMT-05:00 ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>>: Dear All, Please be so kind to note that the First Vote with regard to the Motion of No Confidence proposed by Carlton Samuels is now completed. The voting process was governed by rules 12, 19 and 20 of LACRALO's RoP. Concerning the proposed resolution, the following question was asked in the First Vote: *** QUESTION: Do you believe that LACRALO is competent to vote a motion of no confidence? 1. Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward. 2. No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored. Of the total of 47 ALSs in this voting process, 28 ALSs voted (equivalent to 58,89% of total weight). The minimum quorum requirement was 24 ALSs. Option YES =7 votes equivalent to 13.61% of total weight. Option NO = 21 votes equivalent to 45.28% of total weight. Abstentions to vote = 19 votes equivalent to 41.11% of total weight. According to rule 12.2, At Large Structures abstaining from voting shall be regarded as having not voted. As at Poll close: Friday 16 October 2015 23:00 UTC Number of voters: 28· Group size: 47 · Percentage voted: 58.89 of total weight Ranked by votes Rank Options Weighted Votes % Votes % Voters 1 No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the moción de censura debe ser ignorada 4,531.0000 76.87 21 75.00 Jose Olvidio Salgueiro(w167), Adrian Carballo(w56), Mónica Abalo Laforgia(w56), Javier Eduardo Chandia Rojas(w250), Dr. Aislan Vargas Basilio(w125), Sergio Walter Salinas Porto(w56), Cristian Casas(w56), Alberto Soto(w56), Jose Luis Barzallo(w125), Gilberto Lara(w500), Ana Maria Moreno(w167), Diego Acosta Bastidas(w125), Aida Noblia(w500), Humberto Carrasco(w250), Alejandro Pisanty(w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas(w500), Alyne Andrade(w125), Mario Aleman(w500), Harold Arcos(w167), Vanda Scartezini(w125), Sylvia Herlein Leite(w125) 2 Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / Si, la moción de censura debe proceder 1,363.0000 23.13 7 25.00 Antonio Medina Gomez(w167), Juan Manuel Rojas P(w167), Fatima Cambronero(w56), Jose Arce(w56), Maricarmen Sequera Buzarquis(w250), Ricardo Holmquist(w167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez(w500) *** As per instruction published on the Next Steps regarding the Motion of No Confidence<https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>, the proposed amendment and Mr. Samuels' motion of no confidence must be ignored. You may check the vote result independently under: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q == ES == Hola a todos, Por favor notar que el primer voto sobre la moción de censura propuesta por el Sr. Carlton Samuels se ha completado. El proceso de voto estará gobernado por las reglas 12, 19, y 20 de las Reglas de Procedimiento de LACRALO. Con relación a la resolución propuesta, la siguiente es la pregunta del Primer voto: *** PREGUNTA: ¿Usted cree que LACRALO tiene competencia para votar la moción de censura? 1. Si, la moción de censura debe proceder. 2. No, the moción de censura debe ser ignorada. Del total de 47 ALSes en este proceso de votación, 28 ALSes votaron (equivalente al 58,89% del peso total). El mínimo quorum requerido es 24 ALses. Opción SI - 7 Votos equivalentes al 13,61% del peso total. Opción NO - 21 Votos equivalentes al 45,28% del peso total. Abstenciones al votar = 19 votos equivalentes al 41,11 % del peso total. De acuerdo a la regla 12.2, las estructuras que se abstengan de votar se consideraran como si no hubieran votado. Al momento de cerrar la votación: Viernes 16 de Octubre 2015, 23 UTC. Número de votos: 28. Tamaño del grupo: 47. Porcentaje votado: 58.89 del peso total Posición Opciones Votos Posición Opciones Votos tabuladas % Votos % Votantes 1 No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the moción de censura debe ser ignorada 4,531.0000 76.87 21 75.00 Jose Olvidio Salgueiro(w167), Adrian Carballo(w56), Mónica Abalo Laforgia(w56), Javier Eduardo Chandia Rojas(w250), Dr. Aislan Vargas Basilio(w125), Sergio Walter Salinas Porto(w56), Cristian Casas(w56), Alberto Soto(w56), Jose Luis Barzallo(w125), Gilberto Lara(w500), Ana Maria Moreno(w167), Diego Acosta Bastidas(w125), Aida Noblia(w500), Humberto Carrasco(w250), Alejandro Pisanty(w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas(w500), Alyne Andrade(w125), Mario Aleman(w500), Harold Arcos(w167), Vanda Scartezini(w125), Sylvia Herlein Leite(w125) 2 Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / Si, la moción de censura debe proceder 1,363.0000 23.13 7 25.00 Antonio Medina Gomez(w167), Juan Manuel Rojas P(w167), Fatima Cambronero(w56), Jose Arce(w56), Maricarmen Sequera Buzarquis(w250), Ricardo Holmquist(w167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez(w500) *** De acuerdo a las instrucciones publicadas en los Siguientes pasos acerca de la moción de censura<https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>, la enmienda propuesta y la moción de censura del Sr. Samuels será ignorada. Puede revisar los resultados independientemente bajo: https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Terri Agnew ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Facebook: www.facebook.com/icann<http://www.facebook.com/icann>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-es mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Química UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / LACRALO vote on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty
by apisanty＠gmail.com Oct. 18, 2015

Oct. 18, 2015

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: VOTE RESULTS: LACRALO Vote on Motion Proposed by Alejandro Pisanty / LACRALO vote on the motion proposed by Alejandro Pisanty From: apisanty(a)gmail.com Hi, Does not Reflect the subject motion. This is not a vote on a motion I Proposed. In fact energically I disassociate myself from the motion as proven by my vote Against It. It is remarkable Also That the person (s) who for no confidence did Moved not vote. The subject does not reflect the motion. This vote does not refer to a motion I It has encouraged. In fact I strongly disassociate the motion as test my vote. It is also notable that (s) person (s9 prompted (aron) the motion of Censorship did not vote. Alejandro Pisanty Alejandro Pisanty 18/10/2015 10:08 GMT-05: 00 ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> : > Dear All, > > > > Please be so kind to note that the First Vote with regard to the Motion of > No Confidence proposed by Carlton Samuels is now completed. The > voting process was governed by rules *12, 19 and 20 of LACRALO's RoP*. > Concerning the proposed resolution, the following question was asked in the > First Vote: > > > > *** > > *QUESTION:* Do you believe that LACRALO is competent to vote a motion of > no confidence? > > 1. Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward. > > 2. No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored. > > > > Of the total of 47 ALSs in this voting process, 28 ALSs voted (equivalent > to 58,89% of total weight). The minimum quorum requirement was 24 ALSs. > > > > Option YES =7 votes equivalent to 13.61% of total weight. > > > > Option NO = 21 votes equivalent to 45.28% of total weight. > > > > Abstentions to vote = 19 votes equivalent to 41.11% of total weight. > > > > According to rule 12.2, At Large Structures abstaining from voting shall > be regarded as having not voted. > > > > As at Poll close: Friday 16 October 2015 23:00 UTC > Number of voters: 28· Group size: 47 · Percentage voted: 58.89 of total > weight > > Ranked by votes > > *Rank* > > *Options* > > *Weighted Votes* > > *%* > > *Votes* > > *%* > > *Voters* > > 1 > > No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the moción de > censura debe ser ignorada > > 4,531.0000 > > 76.87 > > 21 > > 75.00 > > Jose Olvidio Salgueiro(w167), Adrian Carballo(w56), Mónica Abalo > Laforgia(w56), Javier Eduardo Chandia Rojas(w250), Dr. Aislan Vargas > Basilio(w125), Sergio Walter Salinas Porto(w56), Cristian Casas(w56), > Alberto Soto(w56), Jose Luis Barzallo(w125), Gilberto Lara(w500), Ana Maria > Moreno(w167), Diego Acosta Bastidas(w125), Aida Noblia(w500), Humberto > Carrasco(w250), Alejandro Pisanty(w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas(w500), > Alyne Andrade(w125), Mario Aleman(w500), Harold Arcos(w167), Vanda > Scartezini(w125), Sylvia Herlein Leite(w125) > > 2 > > Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / Si, la moción de > censura debe proceder > > 1,363.0000 > > 23.13 > > 7 > > 25.00 > > Antonio Medina Gomez(w167), Juan Manuel Rojas P(w167), Fatima > Cambronero(w56), Jose Arce(w56), Maricarmen Sequera Buzarquis(w250), > Ricardo Holmquist(w167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez(w500) > > > > *** > > > > As per instruction published on the Next Steps regarding the Motion of No > Confidence <https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>, the proposed amendment > and Mr. Samuels' motion of no confidence must be ignored. > > > > You may check the vote result independently under: > <https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q> > https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q > > > > == ES == > > > > Hola a todos, > > > > Por favor notar que el primer voto sobre la moción de censura propuesta > por el Sr. Carlton Samuels se ha completado. El proceso de voto estará > gobernado por las reglas *12, 19, y 20* *de las Reglas de Procedimiento > de LACRALO*. Con relación a la resolución propuesta, la siguiente es la > pregunta del Primer voto: > > > > *** > > *PREGUNTA*: ¿Usted cree que LACRALO tiene competencia para votar la > moción de censura? > > 1. Si, la moción de censura debe proceder. > > 2. No, the moción de censura debe ser ignorada. > > > > Del total de 47 ALSes en este proceso de votación, 28 ALSes votaron > (equivalente al 58,89% del peso total). El mínimo quorum requerido es 24 > ALses. > > > > Opción SI - 7 Votos equivalentes al 13,61% del peso total. > > > > Opción NO - 21 Votos equivalentes al 45,28% del peso total. > > > > Abstenciones al votar = 19 votos equivalentes al 41,11 % del peso total. > > > > De acuerdo a la regla 12.2, las estructuras que se abstengan de votar se > consideraran como si no hubieran votado. > > > > Al momento de cerrar la votación: Viernes 16 de Octubre 2015, 23 UTC. > > Número de votos: 28. Tamaño del grupo: 47. Porcentaje votado: 58.89 del > peso total > > Posición Opciones Votos > > *Posición * > > *Opciones* > > *Votos tabuladas* > > *%* > > *Votos* > > *%* > > *Votantes* > > 1 > > No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored / No, the moción de > censura debe ser ignorada > > 4,531.0000 > > 76.87 > > 21 > > 75.00 > > Jose Olvidio Salgueiro(w167), Adrian Carballo(w56), Mónica Abalo > Laforgia(w56), Javier Eduardo Chandia Rojas(w250), Dr. Aislan Vargas > Basilio(w125), Sergio Walter Salinas Porto(w56), Cristian Casas(w56), > Alberto Soto(w56), Jose Luis Barzallo(w125), Gilberto Lara(w500), Ana Maria > Moreno(w167), Diego Acosta Bastidas(w125), Aida Noblia(w500), Humberto > Carrasco(w250), Alejandro Pisanty(w500), Luis Sergio Valle Sejas(w500), > Alyne Andrade(w125), Mario Aleman(w500), Harold Arcos(w167), Vanda > Scartezini(w125), Sylvia Herlein Leite(w125) > > 2 > > Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward / Si, la moción de > censura debe proceder > > 1,363.0000 > > 23.13 > > 7 > > 25.00 > > Antonio Medina Gomez(w167), Juan Manuel Rojas P(w167), Fatima > Cambronero(w56), Jose Arce(w56), Maricarmen Sequera Buzarquis(w250), > Ricardo Holmquist(w167), Lia Patricia Hernandez Perez(w500) > > > > *** > > De acuerdo a las instrucciones publicadas en los Siguientes pasos acerca > de la moción de censura <https://community.icann.org/x/C5lYAw>, la > enmienda propuesta y la moción de censura del Sr. Samuels será ignorada. > > > > Puede revisar los resultados independientemente bajo: > <https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q> > https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=5135fyGZMGse8tJTyLP49p9q. > > > > Regards, > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > Peregrine and Terri Agnew > > ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC > > E-mail: <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org>staff(a)atlarge.icann.org > > Facebook: <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>www.facebook.com/icann > atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> > > Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge > <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty UNAM Faculty of Chemistry 3000 University Avenue,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD SMS FROM MEXICO +525541444475 +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d12fb5a474.html --]]

1 0