May 2016 - lac-discuss-en - lists.icann.org

Re: [lac-discuss-en] STAFF UPDATE Proceso de Mediación - Acerca de LACRALO Cuestiones- Mediation process- About LACRALO issues
by ICANN At-Large Staff May 23, 2016

May 23, 2016

Estimados todos, Gracias por su mensaje y su paciencia sobre este tema. Como miembros del personal, esperamos que entiendan que debemos ser prudentes en anunciar detalles del "LACRALO Roadmap" hasta que los procesos necesarios internos y externos estén en el punto en el que estimemos que el proceso del Roadmap procederá como se han planeado. Como anunciamos en Marrakesh, el personal de ICANN staff está comprometido con este proceso de apoyo para que LACRALO recupere la confianza. Desde el año pasado, hemos entrado en discusiones con un mediador internacionalmente reconocido, bilingüe en Español e Inglés y su equipo, quienes son expertos en negociaciones con valor agregado y construcción de confianza. Estamos en discusiones finales para concretar un contrato con este equipo. Internamente el personal ha trabajado para obtener suficiente asignación presupuestaria dentro del presupuesto del FY17 para esta actividad extraordinaria de LACRALO, la cual requirió separar fondos originalmente destinados para una Asamblea General de LACRALO, para estas actividades. El anuncio oficial de los resultados de las solicitudes Especiales del FY17 serán hechos dentro de poco. En este momento, podemos darles una visión general de las fases planeadas actualmente involucradas en el LACRALO Roadmap. El proceso será implementado en dos fases: Fase 1 : Evaluación de temas /Diseño de Proceso y adaptación del proceso Esta fase la cual empezara en unas pocas semanas, incluirá trabajo preparatorio, entrevistas confidenciales con los representantes de las ALS seleccionadas por los mediadores, seguida por un análisis de las entrevistas. Los productos serán documentos informativos para distribución a todos los representantes de las ALS de LACRALO. Fase 2: Preparación, Intervención y Apoyo Los mediadores tendrán flexibilidad en el diseño exacto de esta fase, basados en los resultados de la Fase 1. Sin embargo esta fase incluirá una Asamblea presencial con un grupo identificado por los mediadores, dicha Asamblea se llevara a cabo en un lugar a ser determinado. El objetivo de estas actividades es concluir con un plan de implementación con acciones específicas las cuales se espera pondrán a LACRALO en un camino constructivo para el futuro. Mayor información será proporcionada en breve ¡Muchas gracias! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ENGLISH Dear All, Thank you for your message and your continuing patience on this issue. As staff, we hope you understand that we must be prudent with announcing the details of the LACRALO Roadmap until the required external and external processes are at a stage where we feel that the process will move forward as planned. As we announced in Marrakesh, ICANN staff are committed to the process of assisting LACRALO to regain trust. Since late last year, we have been engaging in discussions with an internationally respected, bilingual ES/EN mediator and his team who are experts in value-added negotiations and trust-building. We are in final contract discussions with this team. Internally, staff have worked to obtain sufficient budget allocation within the FY17 Budget for this extraordinary LACRALO activity, which required earmarking funds originally intended for a LACRALO General Assembly, for these activities. The official announcement of the results of the FY17 Special Requests will be made shortly. However, at this time we are able to provide you with an overview on the currently planned phases involved in the LACRALO Roadmap. The process will be implemented in two phases: Phase 1 : Issues Assessment/Process Design and Customization This phase, which will begin in a few weeks, will include preparatory work, confidential interviews with LACRALO ALS representatives as selected by the mediators followed by analysis of the interviews. The deliverable will be a briefing document for distribution to all LACRALO ALS representatives. Phase 2: Preparation, Intervention and Support The mediators will have flexibility in the exact design of this phase based on the results of Phase 1. However, it will include a face to face Trust-building Assembly with a selected core group identified by the mediators to be held in a location to be determined. The intent is for these activities to conclude with an implementation plan with specific actions which are expected to set LACRALO on a constructive path for the future. More information will be provided shortly. Thank you! Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Ariel Liang, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine, Terri Agnew and Yeşim Nazlar ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Website: atlarge.icann.org<https://atlarge.icann.org/> Facebook: facebook.com/icann<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>atlarge<https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge> Twitter: @<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge<https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ El Lun 9 de mayo de 2016 a 11:46, Maritza Aguero Y. Minano <myaguero(a)msn.com <mailto:myaguero@msn.com> > Escribió: Estimados miembros del personal de ICANN, En marzo, 13 y después de la reunión de Marrakech, anunciamos a la LACRALO Comunidad que el proceso de mediación se va a iniciar. La semana pasada, en una llamada no formal, nos preguntamos sobre el estado de este proceso y se nos dijo que íbamos a recibir una actualización de la misma y, hasta ahora, aún están a la espera de la respuesta. Estamos profundamente preocupados por esta situación, ya que no hemos recibido una respuesta adecuada a nuestra solicitud con el fin de comunicar a la comunidad LACRALO acerca de la situación de este proceso y cuáles son los próximos pasos. Estamos mirando adelante a oír de usted pronto acerca de esta petición. Saludos, Humberto Carrasco - Silla Maritza Aguero - Secretario _____ Para: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> <mailto:lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> De: hcarrascob(a)gmail.com<mailto:hcarrascob@gmail.com> <mailto:hcarrascob@gmail.com> Fecha: Dom 13 Mar el año 2016 15:00:05 -0300 Asunto: [lac-discuss-es] Sobre LACRALO Cuestiones Estimados miembros de LACRALO, A medida que comienza una nueva era en nuestra región, vemos la necesidad de dar prioridad a la cuestión de la trabajar juntos para resolver los retos a largo existentes en LACRALO con el objetivo fortalecimiento de LACRALO. Con este objetivo en mente, nos gustaría anunciar que, con el apoyo de la Los miembros del ALAC de la región y el personal, vamos a iniciar un proceso paso a paso dentro de poco. Este proceso incluirá el apoyo de un profesional bilingüe, equipo de mediación y contará con muchas oportunidades para los miembros de la comunidad a participar en el desarrollo de la forma de un LACRALO fortalecido. Nosotros le proporcionará más información en breve. Tenemos la firme convicción de que cualquier resultado trabajará para tener un nuevo y renacer región, para el beneficio de todos los miembros de LACRALO, así como para el final usuarios que representamos. Para ello, le solicitamos el apoyo y paciencia hasta obtenemos más información sobre este proceso. Un abrazo fraterno a todos Humberto Carrasco - Silla Maritza Aguero - Secretario _______________________________________________ [[--Original text (en) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/d6315357f1.html --]]

8 7

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ? = Utf-8 q El_abandono_del_BM_desarrollados _ / _ in _ = = utf-8 q desarrollo_Pa = C3 = ADs_paradigma_de_Indicadores_de_Desarro = = utf-8 llo_Mundial q =?????????
by aidanoblia＠gmail.com May 23, 2016

May 23, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:? = Utf-8 q El_abandono_del_BM_desarrollados _ / _ in _ = = utf-8 q desarrollo_Pa = C3 = ADs_paradigma_de_Indicadores_de_Desarro = = utf-8 llo_Mundial q =????????? from: aidanoblia(a)gmail.com Thank Alejandro, enlightening message. It is not my strongest indicators theme but some statistics course I do pretty time and that is a delicate matter how they are obtained, how they combine and what really they mean. What most read in that sense is the ECLAC information, which I find more approached what we understand and want. Next week there very interesting for its subject an event for our region. All this considering that I am not a specialist in these matters, only I keep some information. Greetings to all aída On May 22, 2016, 20:58, Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch <apisan(a)unam.mx> He wrote: > AÃda, > > estudiando este tema mÃ¡s allÃ¡ de la propaganda posible, hay que observar > que la distinciÃ³n se refiere en sentido estricto a la publicaciÃ³n de los > datos del Banco Mundial y no se ha anunciado quÃ© cambiarÃ¡ en la toma de > decisiones. SerÃ¡ interesante seguirlo. > > En MÃ©xico - y creo que igualmente en otros paÃses de la regiÃ³n, al menos > Chile que tambiÃ©n ingresÃ³ a la OCDE) - hace ya dÃ©cadas que la distinciÃ³n es > de utilidad parcial Ãºnicamente. Que se haya perdido utilidad se debe a los > logros de desarrollo de nuestras sociedades; que no se haya borrado por > completo, a nuestras fallas. Es recomendable, como siempre, leer el > documento del Banco Mundial y no sÃ³lo la nota de prensa. Los bibliotecarios > saben que la fuente primaria tiene mucho que enseÃ±arnos y es primordial > acudir a ella. > > Un ejemplo clÃ¡sico del debate acerda del significado de los indicadores de > este tipo, si bien mÃ¡s especÃfico para nuestros temas, estÃ¡ en que Jamaica > aparece sistemÃ¡ticamente como uno de los paÃses con mayor desarrollo con > base en el indicador de densidad de usuarios de las telecomunicaciones, uno > de los mÃ¡s altos del mundo. Â¿Se deberÃa usar un indicador como Ã©se en lugar > de los del Banco Mundial en nuestro Ã¡mbito? Â¿quÃ© consecuencias tendrÃa? > Â¿quÃ© disparidades tiene con otros indicadores y quÃ© implicaciones tienen > estas disparidades? > > Lo que ICANN deba hacer dependerÃ¡ de los distintos casos de uso, segÃºn las > decisiones que tome con base en este criterio. Hay que estar atentos. > Podemos prever que el debate se extienda y que dÃ© lugar a nuevas polÃticas. > OjalÃ¡ nuestros representantes les den seguimiento y nos informen. > > Alejandro Pisanty > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > Facultad de QuÃmica UNAM > Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > > > +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD > > +525541444475 DESDE MÃXICO SMS +525541444475 > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, > http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > ------------------------------ > *Desde:* lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [ > lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] en nombre de Aida Noblia [ > aidanoblia(a)gmail.com] > *Enviado el:* domingo, 22 de mayo de 2016 11:17 > *Hasta:* <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > *Asunto:* Re: [lac-discuss-es] El abandono del BM desarrollados / en > desarrollo PaÃs paradigma de Indicadores de Desarrollo Mundial > > > Muchas Gracias Carlton. Abajo copiÃ© lo que dice la pÃ¡gina despuÃ©s. El > tema tambiÃ©n es "quÃ© es desarrollo" ? > > Desarrollo humano? ... crecimiento poblacional? > > Buen domingo > > Saludos a todos > > AÃda > > > > En la ediciÃ³n de 2016 de sus Indicadores de Desarrollo Mundial, el Banco > Mundial ha hecho una gran elecciÃ³n > <https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=es&ie=UTF8&p…> : > Ya no se distingue entre los paÃses "desarrollados" y "en desarrollo" que > hay en la presentaciÃ³n de sus datos. > > El cambio marca una evoluciÃ³n en el pensamiento sobre la distribuciÃ³n > geogrÃ¡fica de la pobreza y la prosperidad. Pero suena menos radical si > tenemos en cuenta que nadie ha aceptado nunca en una definiciÃ³n de estos > tÃ©rminos en el primer lugar. > > El Fondo Monetario Internacional dice que su propia > <https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=es&ie=UTF8&p…> > distinciÃ³n entre las economÃas avanzadas y de mercados emergentes "no se > basa en criterios estrictos, econÃ³micos o de otro tipo." Las Naciones > Unidas no tienen una definiciÃ³n oficial de un paÃs en desarrollo, a pesar > de golpear la etiqueta en 159 naciones. Y el propio Banco Mundial habÃa > previamente simplemente agrupado los paÃses en los dos tercios inferiores > de ingreso nacional bruto (INB) en la categorÃa, pero incluso eso > comparativamente estricta de corte no era muy Ãºtil. > > "El principal problema es que sÃ³lo hay tanta heterogeneidad entre Malawi y > Malasia por tanto se clasifican en el mismo grupo y Malasia se parece mÃ¡s a > los EE.UU. de Malawi," dice Umar Serajuddin, economista senior de la > oficina de estadÃsticas del Banco Mundial. "Cuando nos agrupamos paÃses > dispares juntos en el mismo grupo, no es realmente Ãºtil." > > Parte de la historia es el Ã©xito de los esfuerzos de desarrollo en las > Ãºltimas dÃ©cadas. Considere este grÃ¡fico que traza los paÃses en un eje de > la mortalidad infantil y fecundidad en 1960 y 2013. En 1960, hay dos claros > grupos-uno con baja mortalidad y fecundidad, uno con mucho mayor. En > 2013, los paÃses han convergido en un grupo mucho mÃ¡s estricta. > > El 22 de mayo de 2016, 13:07, <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> escribiÃ³: > >> >> [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] >> >> Asunto: El abandono del BM desarrollados / en desarrollo PaÃs paradigma >> de Indicadores de Desarrollo Mundial >> De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com >> >> La referencia a uno de mis personajes favoritos - Sir Humphrey - a un >> lado, >> algÃºn burÃ³crata ilustrada en la calle M estÃ¡ dando cuenta humana >> el desarrollo es una mezcla de verdades, algunos no miden en puramente >> econÃ³mico >> Â¡condiciones! Por ejemplo, algunas de las personas mÃ¡s tontas de la >> suciedad de la cristiandad son hasta >> Â¡Norte! >> >> >> >> http://qz.com/685626/the-world-bank-is-eliminating-the-term-developing-coun… >> >> >> Um, Â¿quÃ© va a hacer ahora la ICANN, es una buena pregunta! >> >> >> -Carlton >> >> >> ============================== >> Un Carlton Samuels >> MÃ³vil: 876-818-1799 >> * Estrategia, PlanificaciÃ³n, Gobierno, EvaluaciÃ³n y plazos de entrega * >> ============================= >> >> >> [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/1931e8e26a.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ? = Utf-8 q Resoluciones_del_Board_ = 7C_Reuni = C3 = B3 = = utf-8 n_Regular_15_mayo_2016 q =?????
by apisanty＠gmail.com May 23, 2016

May 23, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:? = Utf-8 q Resoluciones_del_Board_ = 7C_Reuni = C3 = B3 = = utf-8 n_Regular_15_mayo_2016 q =????? from: apisanty(a)gmail.com Harold, dsculpa the delay in answering this important message from you. What do you think Board resolutions that will focus work A THE C? In particular although it is procedural and substantive non, the standards behavior seems to me of great importance. It originates in the incident who accused a member of the community of harassment and this has alleged against the accusation, and now will have a range resolution general. How do you think I should address this issue LACRALO? And again the initial question, what other issues do you think are of Nostros importance? Alejandro Pisanty On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 24:22, Harold Arcos <harold.arcos(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Estimadas y estimados > Reenvío la información compartida por Rinalia Abdul sobre las Resoluciones > del Board alcanzadas en la reciente reunión del 15 mayo. > > *Algunos aspectos claves:* > *** Interesantes aspectos como la Mejora en la Apertura y Transparencia > *** Comentarios Público sobre la revisión propuesta de Conducta en las > Reuniones ICANN. > *** Creación de un Grupo de Trabajo del Board sobre Gobernanza de > Internet (incluyendo a Rinalia) > *** Aprobación de los presupuestos de AC/SO tal como fue presentado por > el Staff. > > Temas en los cuales debemos involucrarnos e informar a nuestras ALSs a fin > de construir entre todos la mejor ICANN posible para los tiempos venideros > en medio del proceso de transición. > > Saludos > > Harold Arcos > ALAC Member - LACRALO > Presidente Internauta Venezuela > @InternautaVe <https://twitter.com/internautave> > @hwarcos <https://twitter.com/hwarcos> > skp: harcos0912 > +58 4129982820 > www.internauta.org.ve > > > > Approved Board Resolutions | Regular Meeting of the ICANNBoard > > 15 May 2016 > > 1. *Consent Agenda: > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#1>* > 1. *Approval of Board Meeting Minutes > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#1.a>* > 2. *Security & Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) Appointment > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#1.b>* > - *Rationale for Resolution 2016.05.15.02 > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#1.…>* > 3. *GNSO gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group Charter Amendments > (2016) > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#1.c>* > - *Rationale for Resolution 2016.05.15.03 > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#1.…>* > 4. *Conduct at ICANN Meetings > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#1.d>* > - *Rationale for Resolutions 2016.05.15.04 – 2016.05.15.05 > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#1.…>* > 5. *Board Working Group on Internet Governance (BWG-IG) > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#1.e>* > 2. *Main Agenda: > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2>* > 1. *Consideration of GNSO Policy Recommendations concerning the > Accreditation of Privacy and Proxy Services > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.a>* > - *Rationale for Resolutions 2016.05.15.07 – 2016.05.15.08 > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.…>* > 2. *Report re: .HOTEL > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.b>* > 3. *SO/AC FY17 Additional Budget Requests Approval > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.c>* > - *Rationale for Resolution 2016.05.15.09 > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.…>* > 4. *October 2016 ICANN Meeting Venue Contracting > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.d>* > - *Rationale for Resolutions 2016.05.15.10 – 2016.05.15.11 > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.…>* > 5. *USG IANA Stewardship Transition – Additional FY16 Expenses and > Funding > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.e>* > - *Rationale for Resolution 2016.05.15.12 > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.…>* > 6. *AOB > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.f>* > 1. *Enhancing Openness and Transparency – Board Deliberations > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.…>* > - *Rationale for Resolution 2016.05.15.13 – 2016.05.15.14 > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#2.…>* > 3. *Executive Session – CONFIDENTIAL > <https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en#3>* > > > > > 1. AOB > 1. Enhancing Openness and Transparency – Board Deliberations > > Whereas, the Board believes that providing increased access to > Board deliberations is important, and that increased openness is an > important means of working toward that goal. > > Whereas, the ICANN Board discussed at its Amsterdam workshop how to > improve its functioning and agreed that enhancing the visibility into the > Board deliberations and decision-making processes was an important part of > becoming more accountable and more transparent. > > Whereas, the Board noted the call from the community for increased > openness and transparency. > > Whereas, the Board believes that a positive first step towards > increased openness is publicly posting transcripts and/or recordings of its > deliberative sessions to the extent that such information or dialogue is > not subject to confidentiality restrictions or privilege. > > Resolved (2016.05.15.13), the Board directs the President and CEO, > or his designee(s), to work with the Board to develop a proposed plan for > the publication of transcripts and/or recordings of Board deliberative > sessions, with such plan to include an assessment of possible resources > costs and fiscal impact, and draft processes to: (i) ensure the accuracy of > the transcript; and (ii) for redaction of portions of the transcript that > should be maintained as confidential or privileged. > > Resolved (2016.05.15.14), the Board expects to evaluate the plan in > Helsinki, and if satisfactory to begin testing of the proposed processes > relating to publication of transcripts and/or recordings of the Board's > deliberative sessions as soon as practicable after Helsinki. > *Rationale for Resolution 2016.05.15.13 – 2016.05.15.14* > > In support of the continued call for visibility into Board > deliberations and processes, the Board has determined to make available > transcripts or recordings, where appropriate, of the Board's deliberative > sessions. This effort to enhance openness is likely to also support the > ICANN community in enhancing ICANN's accountability, as it will > reduce questions of how and why the Board reaches its decisions. This > decision also directly supports ICANN's previous efforts and the > continued goal of operating as openly and transparently in its > decision-making. ICANN is also acting consistently with the ICANN's > Bylaws, as set out in Article III, section 1 of the ICANN Bylaws, > that, "ICANN and its constituent bodies shall operate to the > maximum extent feasible in an open and transparent manner and consistent > with procedures designed to ensure fairness." (ICANN Bylaws at https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en > - III > <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en#III>.) > > There will be issues before the Board for which confidentiality is > still required, and that may require redaction of parts or withholding of > full transcripts, and it is important that the community and the Board > understand how those decisions will be taken. To that end, the Board is > directing the development of a plan, which would include proposed processes > by which those redaction decisions for confidentiality and privilege are to > be made. That plan should be developed as soon as practicable, and should > be ready for Board consideration during ICANN56 in Helsinki. > > This decision will not have any impact on the security, stability > or resiliency of the DNS. Implementation of this decision may > involve increased costs, including, risk and fiscal impact for ICANN > . > > This is an organizational administrative function for which public > comment is not required, but such input may be useful at a later point > depending upon the plan. > > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM University Av 3000,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 +525541444475 SMS FROM MEXICO Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/83bbf59cea.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ??????? Q = iso-8859-1 El_abandono_del_BM_desarrollados _ = = iso-8859-1 q / _ EDs_paradigma_de_Indicadores_de_Desarro en_desarrollo_Pa = = = iso-8859-1 llo_Mundial q =?????
by apisan＠unam.mx May 22, 2016

May 22, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:??????? Q = iso-8859-1 El_abandono_del_BM_desarrollados _ = = iso-8859-1 q / _ EDs_paradigma_de_Indicadores_de_Desarro en_desarrollo_Pa = = = iso-8859-1 llo_Mundial q =????? from: apisan(a)unam.mx Ada, studying this subject beyond the possible propaganda, it should be noted that the distinction refers strictly to the publication of the World Bank data sense and has not announced what change in decision decisions. Be interesting to follow. In Mexico - and I think also in other countries in the region, at least Chile also ingres OECD) - decades ago that the distinction is solely partial utility . Utility has been lost is due to the achievements of development of our societies; that has not been completely erased, our failures. It is advisable, as always, read the document of the World Bank and not only the press release. Librarians know that the primary source has much to teach us and it is essential to go there. A classic example of acerda discussion of the meaning of the indicators of this type, although more especfico for our themes is that Jamaica systematically appears as one of the most developed countries based in user density indicator of telecommunications, one of the most highest in the world. It should be used as an indicator rather than the World Bank in our scope? what are the consequences? qu disparities have with other indicators and what are the implications of these disparities? What ICANN should do depend on the different use cases, according to the decisions you make based on this criterion. We must be vigilant. We can anticipate that the debate will spread and lead to new policies d. Eyelet our representatives to monitor them and report to us. Alejandro Pisanty - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM University Av 3000,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 +525541444475 SMS FROM MEXICO Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________________________________ From: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] on behalf of Aida Noblia [aidanoblia(a)gmail.com] Posted on: Sunday, 22 May 2016 11:17 Until: <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Abandonment of BM developed / developing paradigm Pas World Development Indicators Many Carlton Thanks. Copied below what it says after page. The issue also is "what is development"? Human development? ... population growth? Good Sunday Greetings to all Ada In the 2016 edition of its World Development Indicators, the World Bank has made a great choice < https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=es&ie=UTF8&p…> The change marks an evolution in thinking about the geographic distribution of poverty and prosperity. But it sounds less radical if we consider that no one has ever accepted a definition of these terms in the first place. The International Monetary Fund says its own < https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=es&ie=UTF8&p…> "The main problem is that there is only so much heterogeneity between Malawi and Malaysia therefore are classified in the same group and Malaysia seems msa US Malawi," says Umar Serajuddin, senior economist at office World Bank statistics. "When we gathered together disparate countries in the same group, it is not really useful." Part of the story is the success of development efforts in the last decades. Consider this graphic charting passes in a shaft of infant mortality and fertility in 1960 and 2013.In 1960, there are two clear groups-one with low mortality and fertility, one much higher. In 2013, countries have converged in a group much more strict. On May 22, 2016, 13:07, <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com<mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com> > Wrote: [[Translated text (in -> en) -]] Subject: Abandonment of BM developed / developing paradigm Pas World Development Indicators From: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com <mailto:carlton.samuels@gmail.com> Reference to one of my favorite characters - Sir Humphrey - aside, sb burcrata illustrated on M Street is giving human mind development is a mixture of truths, some not measured in purely economic conditions! For example, some of the people most stupid dirt of Christianity are up North! http://qz.com/685626/the-world-bank-is-eliminating-the-term-developing-coun… Um, what will you do now ICANN is a good question! -Carlton ============================== A Carlton Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 * Strategy, Planning, Government, Evaluation and delivery * ============================= [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/094509a94d.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] ? = Utf-8 q El_abandono_del_BM_desarrollados _ / _ in _ = = utf-8 q desarrollo_Pa = C3 = ADs_paradigma_de_Indicadores_de_Desarro = = utf-8 llo_Mundial q =?????????
by aidanoblia＠gmail.com May 22, 2016

May 22, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re:? = Utf-8 q El_abandono_del_BM_desarrollados _ / _ in _ = = utf-8 q desarrollo_Pa = C3 = ADs_paradigma_de_Indicadores_de_Desarro = = utf-8 llo_Mundial q =????????? from: aidanoblia(a)gmail.com Many Carlton Thanks. I copied down what it says page later. He theme is "what is development"? Human development? ... population growth? Good Sunday Greetings to all aída In the 2016 edition of its World Development Indicators, the Bank World has made a great choice < https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=es&ie=UTF8&p…> : It is no longer a distinction between "developed" and "developing" that There in the presentation of your data. The change marks an evolution in thinking about the distribution Geographic poverty and prosperity.But it sounds less radical if we consider that no one has ever accepted a definition of these terms in the first place. The International Monetary Fund says its own < https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=es&ie=UTF8&p…> distinction between advanced and emerging market economies "are not based on strict, economic or other criteria. "The Nations United do not have an official definition of a developing country, despite label hit 159 nations. And the World Bank itself had previously simply grouped the countries in the lower two thirds of gross national income (GNI) in the category, but even that comparatively strict cut was not very helpful. "The main problem is that there is only so much heterogeneity between Malawi and Malaysia therefore are classified in the same group and Malaysia looks more The USA. Malawi, "says Umar Serajuddin, senior economist ONS World Bank. "When we group countries mixed together in the same group, it is not really useful. " Part of the story is the success of development efforts in the the last decades. Consider this graph plotting countries on a shaft infant mortality and fertility in 1960 and 2013. In 1960, there are two clear groups-one with low mortality and fertility, one much higher. In 2013, countries have converged in a much tighter group. On May 22, 2016, 13:07, <carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com> He wrote: > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto: El abandono del BM desarrollados / en desarrollo PaÃs paradigma > de Indicadores de Desarrollo Mundial > De: carlton.samuels(a)gmail.com > > La referencia a uno de mis personajes favoritos - Sir Humphrey - a un > lado, > algÃºn burÃ³crata ilustrada en la calle M estÃ¡ dando cuenta humana > el desarrollo es una mezcla de verdades, algunos no miden en puramente > econÃ³mico > Â¡condiciones! Por ejemplo, algunas de las personas mÃ¡s tontas de la > suciedad de la cristiandad son hasta > Â¡Norte! > > > > http://qz.com/685626/the-world-bank-is-eliminating-the-term-developing-coun… > > > Um, Â¿quÃ© va a hacer ahora la ICANN, es una buena pregunta! > > > -Carlton > > > ============================== > Un Carlton Samuels > MÃ³vil: 876-818-1799 > * Estrategia, PlanificaciÃ³n, Gobierno, EvaluaciÃ³n y plazos de entrega * > ============================= > > > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/8985b22f04.html --]]

1 0

WB Abandoning the Developed/Developing Country Paradigm from World Development Indicators
by Carlton Samuels May 22, 2016

May 22, 2016

The reference to one of my favourite characters - Sir Humphrey - aside, some enlightened bureaucrat on M Street is finally realizing human development is a mix of verities, some not measured in purely economic terms! For example, some of the dirt dumbest people in christendom are Up North! http://qz.com/685626/the-world-bank-is-eliminating-the-term-developing-coun… Um, what will ICANN do now, is a good question! -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* =============================

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Fwd: Urgent proposals IGF Monday, May 26 Webinar 18 hours
by apisanty＠gmail.com May 21, 2016

May 21, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Fwd: Urgent proposals IGF Monday, May 26 Webinar 18 hours from: apisanty(a)gmail.com Vanda, It will MONDAY 23 TO 18 HRS MEX 23 HRS UTC. Please excuse the error. Detail information itself has this date correctly. Alejandro Pisanty On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:21 PM, <vanda(a)scartezini.org> wrote: > > [[--Translated text (en -> es)--]] > > Asunto: Re: Fwd: propuestas urgentes IGF Webinar Lunes 26 de mayo de 18 > horas > De: vanda(a)scartezini.org > > Será el día 26 Mayo o el lunes 23? > > > Vanda > Enviado desde mi iPhone > Lo siento por los errores tipográficos > > > > On 20 de mai de 2016, at 19:22, "fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com" < > fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > [[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] > > > > Subject: Fwd: URGENT proposals IGF Webinar Monday May 26, 18 hrs > > from: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com > > > > Dear / os, > > > > > > I share below an invitation that may be of interest. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> > > Date: May 20, 2016, 17:05 > > Subject: URGENT proposals IGF Webinar Monday May 26, 18 hrs > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Colleagues, > > > > > > as you will recall the next December will be held in Mexico > > IGF (Internet Governance Forum) and the deadline for filing > > proposals is imminent on 6 June. The proposals are not papers > > but individual workshops and other modalities that require production > > Very specific. > > > > > > So in ISOC Mexico we have decided to organize a Webinar to explain > > the modalities of participation and how to prepare proposals. > > > > > > This urgency will be held on Monday, May 26 at 18 hrs. > > teleconferencing software using the "zoom". Please all / as > those > > interested, they ask them to participate and also disseminate > information. > > > > > > Then the data. See you on Monday in their / our screens. > > > > > > Alejandro Pisanty > > > > > > > > > > * Description: * The Internet Governance Forum will be held in > > Guadalajara, Mexico, from 5 to 9 December 2016. The presentation of > > participation proposals will close on June 6. Holdings in > > IGF have very specific formats because it is not a meeting > > academic nor an operative forum. This workshop will provide the > > elements to prepare proposals for participation attached to > > IGF operation and latest criteria. > > > > > > * Date and Time: * Monday, May 23 at 23 UTC.You can do the conversion > > corresponding time in your country here: > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html > > > > > > * Zoom Access: * > > > > > > Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: > https://isoc.zoom.us/j/4600320240 > > > > > > Or one-tap iPhone: 16,465,687,788.4600320240 14,157,629,988.4600320240 # > or # > > Or Telephone: > > Dial: +1 415 762 9988 (US Toll) or +1 646 568 7788 (US Toll) > > Meeting ID: 460 032 0240 > > International numbers available: > > https://isoc.zoom.us/zoomconference?m=0PliabDwVFT5IXcTwT40VeGRjhXPnc1e > > > > > > > > > > * Speakers * Nancy Quiros, Fatima Cambronero, Alejandro Pisanty > > > > > > *Spanish Language. > > > > > > * Objective: * For the participants to prepare proposals for the IGF. > > > > > > *Program:* > > > > > > 1. IGF: background and format: what is so special? > > > > > > 2. Forms of participation and acceptance criteria for proposals. > > > > > > > > > > * Addressed to *: NGOs, technical community, business, officials and all > > Anyone interested in the Forum, in the Latin American and Caribbean > community. > > > > > > The webinar will be recorded and will be available online posteriormeente > > all concerned. > > > > > > Please do not hesitate to contact me for any questions or to > > respect, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > Dr. Alejandro Pisanty > > Faculty of Chemistry UNAM > > University Av 3000,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico > > + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD > > +525541444475 +525541444475 SMS FROM MEXICO > > Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty > > UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, > > http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty > > ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org > > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > * Fatima Cambronero * > > A lawyer > > Argentina / Mexico > > > > > > Phone: Argentina: +54 9351 5282 668 - Mexico: +52 (55) 3018 2066 > > Twitter: @facambronero > > Skype: fatima.cambronero > > > > > > > > > [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/3995d22b91.html --]]

1 0

Event to schedule
by asoto＠ibero-americano.org May 21, 2016

May 21, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Event to schedule from: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org Dear, an event schedule in our region. Also for those want to actively participate. http://www.observacom.org/invitacion-a-presentar-trabajos-sobre-regulacion-d e-la-convergence-in-the-xiii-congress-de-ALAIC / Best regards Alberto Soto This email has-been protected by YAC (Yet Another Cleaner) http://www.yac.mx [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c68390dea9.html --]]

1 0

Fwd: URGENT proposals IGF Webinar Monday May 26, 18 hrs
by fatimacambronero＠gmail.com May 21, 2016

May 21, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Fwd: URGENT proposals IGF Webinar Monday May 26, 18 hrs from: fatimacambronero(a)gmail.com Dear / os, I share below an invitation that may be of interest. Regards, ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> Date: May 20, 2016, 17:05 Subject: URGENT proposals IGF Webinar Monday May 26, 18 hrs Colleagues, as you will recall the next December will be held in Mexico IGF (Internet Governance Forum) and the deadline for filing proposals is imminent on 6 June. The proposals are not papers but individual workshops and other modalities that require production Very specific. So in ISOC Mexico we have decided to organize a Webinar to explain the modalities of participation and how to prepare proposals. This urgency will be held on Monday, May 26 at 18 hrs. teleconferencing software using the "zoom". Please all / as those interested, they ask them to participate and also disseminate information. Then the data. See you on Monday in their / our screens. Alejandro Pisanty * Description: * The Internet Governance Forum will be held in Guadalajara, Mexico, from 5 to 9 December 2016. The presentation of participation proposals will close on June 6. Holdings in IGF have very specific formats because it is not a meeting academic nor an operative forum. This workshop will provide the elements to prepare proposals for participation attached to IGF operation and latest criteria. * Date and Time: * Monday, May 23 at 23 UTC.You can do the conversion corresponding time in your country here: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html * Zoom Access: * Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://isoc.zoom.us/j/4600320240 Or one-tap iPhone: 16,465,687,788.4600320240 14,157,629,988.4600320240 # or # Or Telephone: Dial: +1 415 762 9988 (US Toll) or +1 646 568 7788 (US Toll) Meeting ID: 460 032 0240 International numbers available: https://isoc.zoom.us/zoomconference?m=0PliabDwVFT5IXcTwT40VeGRjhXPnc1e * Speakers * Nancy Quiros, Fatima Cambronero, Alejandro Pisanty *Spanish Language. * Objective: * For the participants to prepare proposals for the IGF. *Program:* 1. IGF: background and format: what is so special? 2. Forms of participation and acceptance criteria for proposals. * Addressed to *: NGOs, technical community, business, officials and all Anyone interested in the Forum, in the Latin American and Caribbean community. The webinar will be recorded and will be available online posteriormeente all concerned. Please do not hesitate to contact me for any questions or to respect, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM University Av 3000,. 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 +525541444475 SMS FROM MEXICO Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - * Fatima Cambronero * A lawyer Argentina / Mexico Phone: Argentina: +54 9351 5282 668 - Mexico: +52 (55) 3018 2066 Twitter: @facambronero Skype: fatima.cambronero [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/20280bfa24.html --]]

2 1

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Support Apandetec
by apisanty＠gmail.com May 21, 2016

May 21, 2016

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Re: Support Apandetec from: apisanty(a)gmail.com Antonio, ie support blindly. Or is it for some affinity with the organization? Yeah you know them or just have the information that has been made public in she is ready? Alejandro Pisanty 05/20/2016 16:50 GMT-05: 00 Antonio Medina Gomez <amedinagomez(a)gmail.com> : > Las organizaciones tienen el derecho a organizarse. Expresamos nuestro > apoyo en la medida en que trabajen por los ciudadanos de su país. > Respecto a los estatutos y su estructura legal no es a nosotros a quien > corresponde demostrar. Es a ellos que están haciendo la solicitud. > El 20/05/2016 15:38, "Alejandro Pisanty" <apisanty(a)gmail.com> escribió: > >> Antonio, >> >> cualquiera que haya estado leyendo la discusión sobre APANDETEC habrá >> notado que lo que se está pidiendo es evidencia acerca de la existencia, >> funcionalidad, pertinencia y representación de usuarios de esta Asociación. >> >> Tu apoyo sin evidencia se convierte, para algunos de nosotros, en un >> motivo más para votar en contra de su aceptación. ¿Puedes aportar >> respuestas a las preguntas que se han hecho, como sus estatutos? >> >> Alejandro Pisanty >> >> 2016-05-20 13:13 GMT-05:00 Antonio Medina Gómez <amedinagomez(a)gmail.com>: >> >>> La Asociación Colombiana de Usuarios de Internet, ACUI, apoya a la >>> Organización Apandetec para ser miembro de LACRALO. >>> Deseamos a esta organización nuestros deseos por un trabajo en beneficio >>> de los ciudadanos y usuarios de la región. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> lac-discuss-es mailing list >>> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >>> >>> http://www.lacralo.org >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >> Dr. Alejandro Pisanty >> Facultad de Química UNAM >> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico >> +52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD >> +525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475 >> Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty >> Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, >> http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty >> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org >> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . >> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Faculty of Chemistry UNAM Av.University 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD +525541444475 +525541444475 SMS FROM MEXICO Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty UNAM Join the LinkedIn group, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty ---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [[--Original text (es) http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c2efc05ac9.html --]]

1 0