May 2018 - lac-discuss-en - lists.icann.org

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Recordatorio urgente votación LACRALO
by Humberto Carrasco May 22, 2018

May 22, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject:Re: Recordatorio urgente votación LACRALO Desde:Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> Antonio, We hope to see what credentials send you again. They say they sent it. regards Sent from my iPhone On 05-22-2018, at 4:32 PM, Antonio Medina Gómez <amedinagomez(a)gmail.com> wrote: In case you do not send credentials, I ask you, as chair of Lacralo, to postpone these elections and modify the electoral calendar, on the dates when there are guarantees to exercise the right to choose. Antonio Medina Gómez The sea, May 22, 2018 3:28 pm, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> wrote: Antonio, I went back to ask them directly to the person in charge of the Staff. regards Sent from my iPhone On 05-22-2018, at 4:20 PM, Antonio Medina Gómez <amedinagomez(a)gmail.com> wrote: I have already made several requests. To the staff, Silvia Vivanco, Maritza and Humberto. Sunday, Monday and Tuesday I have been requesting the credentials but they have not arrived. There is also no email explaining or clarifying what the situation is. On other occasions there have been no problems. They will have an explanation for faults or delays. Antonio Medina Gómez The sea, May 22, 2018 3:13 pm, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> wrote: Dear friends: We want to remind you that the voting process in LACRALO closes on May 24 at 23: 59UTC. There are several members who have not received their 4 credentials for the respective positions. If this is your case, please send an email urgently to staff(a)atlarge.icann.org with copy of our secretary Maritza that is copied in this email and to me. regards _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/c5e4759fa5.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Recordatorio urgente votación LACRALO
by Maritza Y. Aguero Minano May 22, 2018

May 22, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject:Re: Recordatorio urgente votación LACRALO Desde:"Maritza Y. Aguero Minano" <myaguero(a)msn.com> Dear antonio, I asked for your credentials to the staff immediately you told me and I copied the email. Regards, Sent from my iPhone On May 22 2018, at (s) 15:28, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> wrote: Antonio, I went back to ask them directly to the person in charge of the Staff. regards Sent from my iPhone On 05-22-2018, at 4:20 PM, Antonio Medina Gómez <amedinagomez(a)gmail.com> wrote: I have already made several requests. To the staff, Silvia Vivanco, Maritza and Humberto. Sunday, Monday and Tuesday I have been requesting the credentials but they have not arrived. There is also no email explaining or clarifying what the situation is. On other occasions there have been no problems. They will have an explanation for faults or delays. Antonio Medina Gómez The sea, May 22, 2018 3:13 pm, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> wrote: Dear friends: We want to remind you that the voting process in LACRALO closes on May 24 at 23: 59UTC. There are several members who have not received their 4 credentials for the respective positions. If this is your case, please send an email urgently to staff(a)atlarge.icann.org with copy of our secretary Maritza that is copied in this email and to me. regards _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http: //www.lacralo. org _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/656e795e32.html --]]

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] Recordatorio urgente votación LACRALO
by Humberto Carrasco May 22, 2018

May 22, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject:Re: Recordatorio urgente votación LACRALO Desde:Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> Antonio, I went back to ask them directly to the person in charge of the Staff. regards Sent from my iPhone On 05-22-2018, at 4:20 PM, Antonio Medina Gómez <amedinagomez(a)gmail.com> wrote: I have already made several requests. To the staff, Silvia Vivanco, Maritza and Humberto. Sunday, Monday and Tuesday I have been requesting the credentials but they have not arrived.There is also no email explaining or clarifying what the situation is. On other occasions there have been no problems. They will have an explanation for faults or delays. Antonio Medina Gómez The sea, May 22, 2018 3:13 pm, Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> wrote: Dear friends: We want to remind you that the voting process in LACRALO closes on May 24 at 23: 59UTC. There are several members who have not received their 4 credentials for the respective positions.If this is your case, please send an email urgently to staff(a)atlarge.icann.org with copy of our secretary Maritza that is copied in this email and to me. regards _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es http://www.lacralo.org http://www.lacralo.org [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/04ab70ff36.html --]]

1 0

Recordatorio urgente votación LACRALO
by Humberto Carrasco May 22, 2018

May 22, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] Subject: Recordatorio urgente votación LACRALO Desde:Humberto Carrasco <hcarrascob(a)gmail.com> Dear friends: We want to remind you that the voting process in LACRALO closes on May 24 at 23: 59UTC. There are several members who have not received their 4 credentials for the respective positions. If this is your case, please send an email urgently to staff(a)atlarge.icann.org with copy of our secretary Maritza that is copied in this email and to me. regards [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/45ce90749f.html --]]

1 0

budget issues published - relevant aspects
by Vanda Scartezini May 22, 2018

May 22, 2018

Dear colleagues, here the relevant aspects from the approved budget to 2018/2019 * The Fellowship Program received an increase from 30 to 45 seats per meeting, based on your feedback. In addition, the ICANN organization will be seeking community feedback on the entire Fellowship Program in the next few months. * We heard your concerns about the reduced Community Regional Outreach Program (CROP) funding, and as a result, its funding for outreach is reinstated at $50,000. * We will also be progressively decreasing funding for the ICANN Wiki from $66,000 in FY19 to a commitment of $33,000 for FY20, based on your comments. * In addition, budget was reallocated for the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and data protection and privacy in FY19, as it is prudent planning to anticipate increased expenses next year. Kisses Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos.

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] [lac-discuss-es] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] REMINDER / Important Webinar Invitation | 2018 - Fourth Capacity Building Webinar | 23 May 2018 from 13:00-14:30 UTC
by lilian ivette de luque bruges May 22, 2018

May 22, 2018

Gracias Harold por esta información, muy importante para quienes como miembros de pueblos originarios estamos interesados en seguir atentamente el desarrollo de estas discusiones. Saludos, Lilian Ivette De Luque Bruges El 22 may. 2018 9:36 a. m., Harold Arcos <harold.arcos(a)gmail.com> escribió: Estimadas y estimados colegas de Región Les comparto un amable recordatorio para el Webinar de mañana miércoles. Tendremos reunión del de WT5 dos horas antes y luego el webinar. Me he comprometido con el amigo Javier Rua, quien es co-chair de ese grupo, en invitar a grupos con diferentes perspectivas que puedan aportar más a la discusión, como por ejemplo poblaciones originarias de nuestros países que estén interesados en dar seguimiento al tema. Ya en Ecuador y Colombia tengo algunos candidatos a invitar y si alguien conoce de otros compañeros que podamos invitar por favor déjenme saber. Saludo fraterno. Harold ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>> Date: Fri, May 18, 2018 at 7:00 AM Subject: [ALAC-Announce] REMINDER / Important Webinar Invitation | 2018 - Fourth Capacity Building Webinar | 23 May 2018 from 13:00-14:30 UTC To: ALAC Announce <alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:alac-announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org>> Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>> If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org with your preferred number. Also find attached, Webex instructions. Español después de la version en inglés Version francaise en bas du mail ********************* Dear All, On behalf of Tijani Ben Jemaa, Chair of the Capacity Building Working Group, we would like to invite you to join the fourth webinar of the new At-Large Capacity Building Program – 2018<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…> on the Topic of "New gTLD: Geographic Names (WT 5)” [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…> The objective of this webinar is to update the At-Large Community regarding the work of the Geographic Names in the new gTLD Subsequent Procedure Process (Work Track 5) and the various conclusions of the WT5 before the issue of its initial report. The trainers will be Cheryl Langdon-Orr [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_di…> and Javier Rúa Jovet [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_pa…> The webinar is scheduled on Wednesday, 23 May 2018 from 13:00-14:30 UTC (90 minutes). For other times: https://tinyurl.com/ycqnhalm The draft agenda and call details are available at: https://community.icann.org/x/-R0FBQ French and Spanish interpretation will be provided. ADIGO Conference ID’s: EN: 1638 ES: 1738 FR: 1838 ADIGO Toll Free numbers: http://www.adigo.com/icann<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adigo.com_icann&d=D…> New Web conference tool: Webex- participant guide attached Please join the meeting room here: 1. Click here [mytrials.webex.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mytrials.webex.com_myt…> to join the online event. Or copy and paste the following link to a browser: https://mytrials.webex.com/mytrials/onstage/g.php?MTID=e0366a021fb6aab48111… 2. Click "Join Now". WebEx Audio connection: It’s possible to connect via WebEx VoIP, but audio quality cannot be guaranteed. We recommend you connect to the audio bridge with your telephone. To receive a call back, provide your phone number when you join the event, or call the number below and enter the access code. USA Toll: 1-240-454-0879 Global call-in numbers: https://mytrials.webex.com/mytrials/globalcallin.php?serviceType=EC&ED=6625…<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mytrials.webex.com_myt…> Access code: 924 411 352 If you require a dial-out, please contact At-Large Staff at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org with your preferred number. Thank you. Kind regards, ***************** Estimados todos, En nombre de Tijani Ben Jemaa, Presidente del grupo de trabajo de Creación de Capacidades, nos gustaría invitarles al cuarto webinar del nuevo programa At-Large Capacity Building Program – 2018 [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…>con el tema de: "New gTLD: Geographic Names (WT 5)” [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…> / "Nuevos gTLD: nombres geográficos (WT 5)" El objetivo de este seminario web es actualizar la Comunidad At-Large con respecto al trabajo de los Nombres geográficos en el Proceso de procedimiento posterior de nuevos gTLD (Tema 5) y las diversas conclusiones del WT5 antes de la publicación de su informe inicial. Los facilitadores de capacitación serán: Cheryl Langdon-Orr [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_di…> y Javier Rúa Jovet [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_pa…> El seminario web está programado para el miércoles, 23 de mayo a las 13:00-14:30 UTC (90 minutos). Para consultas de otros horarios: https://tinyurl.com/ycqnhalm [tinyurl.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tinyurl.com_ycqnhalm&d…> Los detalles de la agenda se encuentran disponibles en: https://community.icann.org/x/-R0FBQ [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…> Las interpretaciones en francés y español serán ofrecidas durante la llamada. Conference ID’s: EN: 1638 ES: 1738 FR: 1838 Nueva herramienta de conferencia web: Webex Por favor, únase a la sala de reuniones aquí: 1. Clic aqui [mytrials.webex.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mytrials.webex.com_myt…>para unirse al evento en línea. * O copie y pegue el siguiente enlace a un navegador: https://mytrials.webex.com/mytrials/onstage/g.php?MTID=e0366a021fb6aab48111… [mytrials.webex.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mytrials.webex.com_myt…> 1. Haz clic en "Join now". Conexión de audio WebEx: Es posible conectarse a través de WebEx VoIP, pero no se puede garantizar la calidad de audio. Le recomendamos que se conecte al puente de audio con teléfono. Para recibir una devolución de llamada, proporcione su número de teléfono cuando se una al evento. Si desea una llamada d’ADIGO, por favor solicítela al Staff de At-Large at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org con su número de preferencia. Muchas gracias, Saludos cordiales, ********************** Cher Tous, Au nom de Tijani Ben Jemaa, président du groupe de travail de Renforcement des Capacités At-Large, nous aimerions vous inviter à participer au quatrième webinaire de cette nouvelle serie At-Large Capacity Building Program – 2018 sur le sujet: "New gTLD: Geographic Names (WT 5)” [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…> / "Nouveau gTLD: Noms géographiques (WT 5)" L'objectif de ce webinaire est de mettre à jour la communauté At-Large concernant le travail des noms géographiques dans le processus de Procédure Subséquente des Nouveaux gTLD (piste de travail 5) et les différentes conclusions du WT5 avant la publication de son rapport initial. Les présentateurs seront : Cheryl Langdon-Orr [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_di…> et Javier Rúa Jovet [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_pa…> Le webinaire est programé le mercredi 23 mai 2018 de 13:00 à 14:30 UTC (90 minutes). Pour d’autres horaires: https://tinyurl.com/ycqnhalm [tinyurl.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tinyurl.com_ycqnhalm&d…> L’ordre du jour et les details de l’appel sont disponibles à: https://community.icann.org/x/-R0FBQ [community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_…> ADIGO Codes conference: EN: 1638 ES: 1738 FR: 1838 Numérons d’appel ADIGO: http://www.adigo.com/icann [adigo.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adigo.com_icann&d=D…> Nouvel Outil (à la place d’Adobe Connect): WebEx Merci de vous joindre à la salle de reunion ici: 1. Cliquez ici [mytrials.webex.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mytrials.webex.com_myt…> pour vous joindre à l’événement en ligne Or copiez et collez le lien suivant dans un navigateur: https://mytrials.webex.com/mytrials/onstage/g.php?MTID=e0366a021fb6aab48111… [mytrials.webex.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mytrials.webex.com_myt…> 2. Cliquez sur "Join Now". Connexion Audio WebEx: C’est possible de se connecter via WebEx VoIP, mais la qualité de l’audio n’est pas garantie. Nous vous recommendons de vous connecter au pont audio avec votre téléphone. Pour recevoir un appel, indiquez votre numero de téléphone lorsque vous joignez l’evenement. Si vous avez besoin que l’opératrice ADIGO vous appelle, merci de confirmer au staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> votre numéro d’appel par retour d’email. (NE PAS mettre la liste en copie). Merci. Cordialement, ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> Website: atlarge.icann.org[atlarge.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__atlarge.icann.org_&d=D…> Facebook: facebook.com/icann[facebook.com]atlarge[facebook.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_icann…> Twitter: @[twitter.com]ICANNAtLarge[twitter.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ICANNAtLar…> [cid:image001.png@01D3EEB0.844CD940] _______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:ALAC-Announce@atlarge-lists.icann.org> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org

1 0

TODAY - Invitation Conference in LIma - Peru
by Maritza Y. Aguero Minano May 22, 2018

May 22, 2018

<DNT> Dear all, San Martin de Porres School of Law (Lima, Peru) is organizing an event celebrating Internet Day. This event have the special collaboration of ICANN, GOOGLE, Internet Society, among others. We have record some promotional videos for our event and I am happy to share them with you. You can find them here: https://www.facebook.com/maritzayesenia.aguerominano/media_set?set=a.222784… Remote participation is going to be available. The link is: https://livestream.com/internetsociety/dmcomunicaciones Regards, Maritza Agüero, MSc. <DNT>

1 0

Re: [lac-discuss-en] [lac-discuss-es] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] REMINDER / Meeting Invitation: ALAC Monthly Call on Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 12:00 UTC
by Carlos Raul Gutierrez May 22, 2018

May 22, 2018

Thanks for your fast and thorough response Ricardo! First of all, let me clarify that I was referring to the letter of the CPH only. Not of the NCSG. As NomCom nominated member of the GNSO assigned to the CPH, I must tell you that I have never gotten the feeling that anything discussed in either group of the CPH is driven by hate. Moreover, over the last year the discussions on budget, reviews and the need for a lot of volunteer support for the very necesary policy development have been the main issues discussed at all levels of the GNSO, CPH and Registries and Registrars stakeholder groups. I really see no reason by reading the letter to assume any hidden motivation for this letter and hope that LACRALO as a Group will do as well. We really have to avoid such comments unless you have any way to substantiate them. The budgetary, personal and accountability stress that the oong list of reviews has on the whole organization is more than well documented, as you can see from the recent blog and webinar that will deal in detail with short and long term proposal from the organzation to the community to deal with the high responsability of all review. I can't read more in Graeme's letter that a very big worry about the high standars we expect from all reviews that justify the newly won independence of ICANN. I look forward to your feedback and comments on our next LACRALO call, maybe on 28 May if it gets confirmed, as I have another call tomorrow monring and wont be able to follow the ALAC call. I wish you a very nice week. --- Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- mQENBFqh7xwBCAC7PBUUek72U8teLrAieWI+JBo/nz0rQObzKgzGNWm2bb+i90mD roNsrvwDJiGOsB/VAhJy6ilIhs++QrxhVEzMz6oKJa8ANaNNvnK2Z8heYm1aC97E qY6y1z853b6F3XrN8262dor9NZEqaK28NVwLsFTfkGKhb4f3rJlCDmhwxt5VHhBQ MHKGxyutq0fyJpG6QpoAoRLaYXrq+xjXARhN9JBjeRRzbjnBbWt7+lRdCrZdOxfD ivRut9F2zMJq8RmeI5goTcq03IRLtKf41A6Np5K//HLe7GlHWH9g4pSKF+UB+EMe S506TxI0dVbyT3jlTnhhfNA/bpQXHcdCZ5EhABEBAAG0F2Nhcmxvc3JhdWxAZ3V0 aWVycmV6LnNliQEcBBABAgAGBQJaoe8cAAoJEOkK/VKjr2tvztgH/1zInwNszd4w 21UilxVmXX2J1SPZG6xXwbwU5BukIm7iBVYwxxPlIAZdJbG0/QynK2oWU1e1Zjed vBemfJtjOn2yRWo3P13PUV/2/trHWgUk5bA3eIUbWDW5fQRLW+TaHC7TuRKgRaJC NgdBItEniQz7DakGzld3PWmsTvIWd4N/fqzATD3DOZmONF52lyVuAEvKoF4rMRTR emvCrL66xEu19u9+Urk7R+DQuFQMNuX0MqC6/vIsmXYZPH7jnV6ZDyzb0BUnjYcx 6MH/YwJx29yjA4iN1NpwCpy1hc+YP1oavz2t+6isM6wB0mXlAazw2d83zwypsH6C 8xgjuRFm9xQ= =RX04 -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- El 2018-05-21 07:04, Ricardo Holmquist escribió: > Dear Carlos Raul, > The point is not in agenda, but for sure we can arise it as an AOB item. > > In other hand, the actual answer from Alan Greenberg is that the NCSG letter is not official, and that once official, ALAC will answer it. > > IMHO both letters were written with more hate than real toughs. I might agree that the external review have some trues, but my first reading a while ago is that it also contains a bunch of missinformation and half trues (reading both letters, I can find where they came from). > > It was the work of a lot of people, not only from ALAC, but from all the RALOs, involved in the preparation of the answer, also there were at least two comment periods, and the opportunity to submit comments to the LACRALO or ALAC working on it (I was not in ALAC, nor in the WG, altough I send several comments at the time). > > This is almost in the final steps of approval (or not) from the Board, to begin an implementation plan, where for sure, we all need to put more than a grain of sand to make it work, not only for ALAC, but importantly for LACRALO. > > Sincerely > > Ricardo Holmquist > > On Mon, 21 May 2018 at 13:50, Carlos Raul Gutierrez <crg(a)isoc-cr.org> wrote: > >> To our LACRALO representatives in ALAC, >> >> I kindly request to our members in ALAC, to take the opportunity of this call and discuss the CPH letter of 7 May to the ICANN Chairman on the ALAC Implementation Overview Proposal, Approved by the ALAC, 20 April 2018 (both attached for your convenience). Under any circumstance (not only present budgetary constrains) this letter from a GNSO constituency as very relevant to our past and future work, and we should be have all elements for a serious discussion on our next LACRALO call on 28 May. >> >> Happy week to all >> >> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez >> ISOC Costa Rica Chapter >> skype carlos.raulg >> +506 8837 7176 >> ________ >> Apartado 1571-1000 >> COSTA RICA >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: ICANN AT-LARGE STAFF <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> >> Date: Mon, May 21, 2018 at 4:31 AM >> Subject: [ALAC-Announce] REMINDER / Meeting Invitation: ALAC Monthly Call on Tuesday, 22 May 2018 at 12:00 UTC >> To: ALAC Announce <alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> >> Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> >> >> If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at staff(a)atlarge.icann.org with your preferred number. Also find attached, WebEx instructions. >> >> Dear All, >> >> The May ALAC MONTHLY CALL is scheduled for TUESDAY, 22 MAY 2018 FROM 12:00 – 14:00 UTC. >> >> For other times: https://tinyurl.com/y83uvmen [1] >> >> The agenda (to be updated) and call details are available at: https://community.icann.org/x/OxoFBQ >> >> NEW CONNECTION INFORMATION >> >> NEW WEB CONFERENCE TOOL: WEBEX >> >> PLEASE JOIN THE MEETING ROOM HERE: >> >> 1. Click here [mytrials.webex.com] [2] to join the online event. >> Or copy and paste the following link to a browser: >> https://mytrials.webex.com/mytrials/onstage/g.php?MTID=e6c65cd92f8fb4373cc6… >> 2. Click "Join Now". >> >> AUDIO CONNECTION: >> >> To receive a call back, provide your phone number when you join the event, or call the number below and enter the access code. >> USA Toll: 1-240-454-0879 >> Global call-in numbers: https://mytrials.webex.com/mytrials/globalcallin.php?serviceType=EC&ED=6697… >> Access code: 926 423 814 >> >> CONFERENCE ID'S: >> >> English: 1638 >> >> Spanish: 1738 >> >> French: 1838 >> >> Russian: 2138 >> >> Dial-in numbers: HTTP://ADIGO.COM/ICANN/ [3] >> >> IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND THE CALL PLEASE SEND AN EMAIL INDICATING YOUR ABSENCE AND WE WILL NOTE THIS INFORMATION ON THE AGENDA. >> >> If you require a dial-out please contact At-Large staff at: STAFF(a)ATLARGE.ICANN.ORG [4] >> >> Thank you. >> Kind Regards, >> >> ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community >> >> E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org [4] >> >> Website: atlarge.icann.org [4] >> >> Facebook: facebook.com/icannatlarge [4] >> >> Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge [4] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ALAC-Announce mailing list >> ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce >> >> At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org >> _______________________________________________ >> lac-discuss-es mailing list >> lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es >> >> http://www.lacralo.org > > _______________________________________________ > lac-discuss-es mailing list > lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-es > > http://www.lacralo.org Links: ------ [1] https://tinyurl.com/y83uvmen [2] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mytrials.webex.com_myt… [3] http://adigo.com/icann/ [4] http://kolabnow.com/./#NOP

5 8

RES: Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large
by sylvia＠internautabrasil.org May 22, 2018

May 22, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject: RES: Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large Desde:<sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org> v \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);} or \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);} w \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);} .shape {behavior: url (# default # VML);} Dear Vanda Thank you very much for your words and for always being willing to work hard for LACRALO regards Sylvia _______________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein Leite sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org LACRALO-ALAC Delegate to NomComm 2014-2016 From: Vanda Scartezini [mailto: vanda(a)scartezini.org] Sent in: terça-feira, 22 de maio de 2018 10: 19To: Alberto Soto; sylvia(a)internautabrasil.orgCc: 'LACRALO Espa� ol'Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Note from Contracte Party House (CPH) on At-Large reviewPriority: High <DNT> Hola Sylvia & Alberto Alejandro escribió una mención sobre la mediación que creo nadie que sigue más de cerca a LACRALO tiene la misma opinión. Yo, personalmente, creo que se está trabajando en la mediación con la debida prioridad, Sergio y Yo tuvimos calls directamente con DAVID luego de nuestro retorno de San Juan y seguimos con los demás colegas a trabajar en el draft de los principios que colocamos a conocimiento de todos. La intención de mediación es cambiar lo más pronto las reglas de procedimiento y por mi voy estar trabajando lo más rápido posible para tener todo listo antes de Barcelona. Aprovecho para recordar que este grupo de electos para LACRALO, de este a� o, tendrá solo 1 a� o es sus posiciones y el próximo a� o 2019 las votaciones deben seguir las recomendaciones de la Mediación. Por lo tanto todo debe estar listo y comprendido por nuestra comunidad antes de Barcelona para que haga suficiente tiempo para adecuación a las nuevas reglas antes de la próxima elección. Fuerte abrazo a los dos Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004 01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 Sorry for any typos. From: "lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org>Date: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 at 09:31To: sylvia leite <sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org>Cc: "lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org" <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large Sylvia, aquí totalmente de acuerdo! Solo que yo dije que el proceso de Mediación es sustancial, pero no prioritario en este momento. Saludos Alberto Soto De: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org <sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org> Enviado el: martes, 22 de mayo de 2018 09:28 a.m.Para: 'Alberto Soto' <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org>CC: 'LACRALO Espa� ol' <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>Asunto: RES: [lac-discuss-es] Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large Querido Alberto, gracias por tu pronta respuesta y por la aclaración; porque cuando una lee: ” Como candidato contesto ahora, totalmente de acuerdo con los comentarios y propuesta de Alejandro.”, se entiende que estás de acuerdo con que la mediciación fue un fracaso, y es por eso que decidí escribirte. Creo que todos sabemos como es nuestra idiosincrasia, nuestra manera de pensar y actuar y de “los tiempos necesarios” para hacer cambios. Es por eso que vuelvo a repetir que si alguien tiene una idea o forma mejor para solucionar nuestros antiguos problemas, que por favor se manifieste. No puedo coincidir contigo en la que mediación no sea SUSTANCIAL en estos momentos, ya que ella trata de solucionar problemas de base que nos afectan desde hace muchos a� os, por lo que personalmente, la considero vital. Lo que me sorprende mucho es que algunos interpreten, a mi entender, como cambios positivos de actitud y participación, como: “ repartirse la región”. Lo que se busca en la mediación es terminar con las “disputas históricas”! y cuando eso parece estar terminando hay miembros de la comunidad les parece raro o sospechoso???!!! Realmente es dificil de entender y ni puedo imaginar lo dificil que debe ser para las nuevas ALSs de LACRALO. ES UNA PENA! Saludos a todos. Sylvia _______________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein Leite sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org LACRALO-ALAC Delegate to NomComm 2014-2016 De: Alberto Soto [mailto:asoto@ibero-americano.org] Enviada em: segunda-feira, 21 de maio de 2018 22:52Para: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.orgCc: 'LACRALO Espa� ol'Assunto: RE: [lac-discuss-es] Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large Hola Sylvia, gracias por preguntar, estoy muy bien. Vanda tiene razón, no fui yo quien hizo esas observaciones. Y cuando dije comparto, no aclaré si lo estaba en su totalidad o parcialmente. En realidad no lo consideré necesario, porque en estos momentos tenemos muchos temas sustanciales en la región que merecen la opinión de todos y cada uno de nosotros, y estoy esperando eso. No significa que el proceso de mediación no sea sustancial, pero en estos momentos no es prioritario. Yo particularmente estoy en unos doce grupos de trabajo entre LACRALO y ICANN, porque pienso que son buenos para nuestra Región, y lleva tiempo. Yo puse todo de mí para que salga bien la mediación y así continuaré. Un ejemplo, en la reunión de Los Ángeles se convinieron varias cosas. Entre ellas la generación de planificación inicial mediante un diagrama de Gantt. Pese a estar de vacaciones, me comprometí a hacer el diagrama y lo entregué a la semana siguiente. Apareció unos ocho meses después. Y esta lentitud es mi principal crítica. Este proceso comenzó en una reunión mensual suspendida creo que en el 2015 y aún no terminó. Y no hay un cronograma que lo diga. Es cierto que en varias cosas no estaba de acuerdo, y como siempre, las hice notar, siempre. Pero en función de la forma de trabajo, resolví por el consenso, que es la forma que debemos buscar todos. No hacer prevalecer nuestra opinión, sino opinar, escuchar, opinar, respetar. Creo que debemos tener en cuenta el tema de priorizar los temas, le vendrá muy bien a todos, pero particularmente a nuestra Región. Saludos cordiales Alberto Soto De: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org <sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org> Enviado el: lunes, 21 de mayo de 2018 04:39 p.m.Para: 'Alberto Soto' <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org>CC: 'LACRALO Espa� ol' <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>Asunto: RES: [lac-discuss-es] Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large Hola Alberto, Cómo estás? Me podrías explicar y explicar a todos los que no tuvieron la oportunidad de participar en el proceso de mediadión personalmente tanto en los Angeles en 2017 como en Puerto Rico en 2018, por qué crees que la Mediación fue un fracaso??? Realmente no entiendo, proque tanto vos como otros miembros de LACRALO que estuvieron en la reuniones no comentaron nada a este respecto en ningun momento y especificamente por que al final de cada encuentro hubo un momento final para que cada uno se pudiera expresar sobre lo vivido en la reuniones. Especialmente en el encuentro de Puerto Rico, surgieron muy buenas ideas y el entendidimiento entre las partes fue excelente ( por lo menos así se manifestaron los presentes). Es por eso que no consigo entender las manifestaciones CATEGÓRICAS que vos y otros miembros están manifestando en la lista. Este tipo de actitudes confunden al resto de la comunidad, cuando reciben noticias y comentarios de las reuniones y de repente aparecen mensajes en la lista hablando del fracaso del proceso de mediación. Y por otro lado, el proceso aun no terminó! Yo personalmente creo que todo el esfuerzo que tanto Rodrigo de la Parra, el staff, los mediadores, Humberto y Maritza y miembros de la comunidad participantes son genuinos y productivos. Y sí creo en el proceso de mediación como la única solución encontrada por todos despues de a� os de conflicto. Me gustaría saber también, si alguien tiene o quiere proponer otra solución, sin duda que será bienvenida por todos. Considero que lo debemos hacer ahora es contar, aclarar y debatir entre toda la comunidad lo que discutimos y propuso en PR y seguir trabajando para que todos los esfuerzos colocados en esta mediación tengan el resultado que todos deseamos y no confundir a la comunidad con comentarios vagos. No estás de acuerdo conmigo, estimado Alberto? Y lo mismo le pregunto a Alejandro Pisanty que participó de la reunion en Los Angeles y lamentablemente, a última hora, no puedo participar en la de PR; pero sé que siempre está al tanto de todo. Saludos a todos, Sylvia _______________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein Leite sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org LACRALO-ALAC Delegate to NomComm 2014-2016 De: lac-discuss-es [mailto:lac-discuss-es-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome de Alberto SotoEnviada em: domingo, 20 de maio de 2018 14:54Para: 'Alejandro Pisanty'Cc: 'LACRALO Espa� ol'Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large Como candidato contesto ahora, totalmente de acuerdo con los comentarios y propuesta de Alejandro. Saludos cordiales Alberto soto. De: Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> Enviado el: domingo, 20 de mayo de 2018 01:32 p.m.Para: Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org>CC: LACRALO Espa� ol <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org>Asunto: Re: [lac-discuss-es] Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large Alberto, gracias por compartir esta dos manifestaciones de opinión de grupos relevantes de ICANN. Si bien es posible estar en desacuerdo con aspectos de cada uno de ellos, especialmente la vision sectaria que se ha apoderado de la NCSG, y otros que seguramente vendrán, tampoco es posible dejar de observar que la autocomplacencia y falta de autocrítica que dan pie a la propuesta de ALAC están siendo pagadas en un justo precio. Esto no deja de tener su reflejo claro en LACRALO, donde el fracaso del proceso de mediación se manifiesta en la repetición de los vicios se� alados en el Review, en que se estén reavivando en foros no públicos las mismas viejas rencillas que originaron el conflicto vez dio lugar a la mediación, y sobre todo, que se siga sin foco en el desarrollo de políticas, que era el acuerdo número uno de la mediación en febrero de 2017. El único camino hacia adelante es revisar con profunda autocrítica las respuestas de ALAC, y no dejar que sean transmitidas de manera oficial en nuestr representación hasta que no sean satisfactorias; y en paralelo, enfocar el gasto de energía, tiempo y otros recursos de LACRALO a las propuestas sutantivas. Los representantes y funcionarios de LACRALO deben avisar a ALAC que se elaborará una propuesta y procesar lo necesario para construirla antes, durante y después del proceso electoral en marcha, con el compromiso de los nuevos entrantes de lleva rlo a cabo de inmediato. Alejandro Pisanty 2018-05-20 10:23 GMT-05:00 Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org>: Estimados, en la nota de NSCG, se menciona esta nota de la Contracted Party House, cuyos términos son similares para la Revisión At-Large. Es una traducción no oficial y el link corto para ver el original publicado en ICANN https://goo.gl/NQzaVC Saludos cordiales Alberto Soto 7 de mayo de 2018 FAO: Comité de Efectividad Organizacional (OEC) de la ICANN de la Junta y Cherine Chalaby, Presidente de la Junta Directiva de ICANN Re: Declaración de preocupación para At-Large Review Implementation Implementation Proposal Queridos miembros de Cherine y del Comité: En nombre de la Contracted Party House (CPH) me gustaría expresar nuestra profunda preocupación con el contenido y la intención de la Propuesta general de implementación de la revisión de At-Large, que fue publicado el 20 de abril de 2018. Esta propuesta sigue a la Revisión At-Large de 2017. Durante el período de comentarios públicos CPH, entre muchos otros SO / AC, envió comentarios críticos que posteriormente se incluyeron en las recomendaciones en el informe final de ITEMS International. Estas recomendaciones, junto con la evaluación de viabilidad de la revisión y recomendaciones de At-Large y El personal de la ICANN dise� ó el plan de implementación con preguntas directas para ALAC. El CPH considera la propuesta mencionada no aborda estas cuestiones, ni responde a las críticas específicas planteadas en el informe de revisión de At-Large. De hecho, todo las recomendaciones han sido rechazadas o modificadas. Además, si el a propuesta es adoptada por la OEC y la Junta Directiva de ICANN sin que el ALAC se ocupe adecuadamente de las preocupaciones de la comunidad más amplia de la ICANN, esto sentaría un precedente alarmante para cualquier futura revisión de ICANN. Si las opiniones y recomendaciones críticas, particularmente aquellas que son ampliamente apoyados dentro de la comunidad de la ICANN, se los percibe como ignorantes en última instancia, Las revisiones de la ICANN perderán credibilidad. El CPH cree que el Comité de Efectividad Organizacional de la Junta de ICANN debería no considerar la propuesta de ALAC hasta el momento en que ALAC proporcione una respuesta detallada que aborda las críticas planteadas por el informe de revisión de At-Large, y las preguntas amablemente reunidos por el personal de ICANN. Esta respuesta debe presentarse a toda la ICANN comunidad, para que cualquier aporte adicional o discusión con la comunidad pueda ser arreglado, para ver la Revisión hasta un final apropiado. Tuyo sinceramente, Graeme Bunton Chair RrSG _______________________________________________lac-discuss-es mailing listlac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-eshttp://www.lacralo.org -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro PisantyFacultad de Química UNAMAv. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO SMS +525541444475Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.comLinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisantyUnete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/b91f35c327.html --]]

1 0

RES: Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large
by sylvia＠internautabrasil.org May 22, 2018

May 22, 2018

[[--Translated text (es -> en)--]] [[--This message had format issues and was not translated properly--]] Subject: RES: Nota de Contracte Party House (CPH) sobre revisión At-Large Desde:<sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org> v \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);} or \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);} w \\: * {behavior: url (# default # VML);} .shape {behavior: url (# default # VML);} Dear Alberto, thank you for your prompt response and clarification; because when one reads: "As a candidate I answer now, totally in agreement with the comments and proposal of Alejandro.", It is understood that you agree that the mediation was a failure, and that is why I decided to write to you. I think we all know what our idiosyncrasies are like, our way of thinking and acting and the "necessary times" to make changes. That's why I repeat again that if someone has an idea or better way to solve our old problems, please let it show. I can not agree with you in which mediation is not SUBSTANTIAL at this time, since it tries to solve basic problems that affect us for many years, so personally, I consider it vital. What surprises me a lot is that some interpret, in my opinion, as positive changes of attitude and participation, such as: "divide the region." What is sought in mediation is to end the "historical disputes"!and when that seems to be ending, there are members of the community that seem strange or suspicious ??? !!! It really is difficult to understand and I can not imagine how difficult it must be for the new LACRALO ALSs. IT IS A PITY! Greetings to all. Sylvia _______________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein Leite sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org LACRALO-ALAC Delegate to NomComm 2014-2016 From: Alberto Soto [mailto: asoto(a)ibero-americano.org] Sent em: segunda-feira, 21 de maio de 2018 22: 52To: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.orgCc: 'LACRALO Espa� ol'Assunto: RE: [lac-discuss- es] Note from Contracte Party House (CPH) on At-Large Review Hello Sylvia, thanks for asking, I'm very good. Vanda is right, it was not me who made those observations. And when I said I share, I did not clarify whether it was in whole or in part. I did not really consider it necessary, because at the moment we have many substantial issues in the region that deserve the opinion of each and every one of us, and I am waiting for that.It does not mean that the mediation process is not substantial, but at the moment it is not a priority. I am particularly in about twelve working groups between LACRALO and ICANN, because I think they are good for our Region, and it takes time. I put all of myself so that the mediation goes well and so I will continue. For example, at the meeting in Los Angeles several things were agreed upon. Among them the generation of initial planning through a Gantt chart. Despite being on vacation, I committed myself to making the diagram and gave it to the following week. He appeared about eight months later. And this slowness is my main criticism.This process started in a suspended monthly meeting I think in 2015 and it has not ended yet. And there is no timetable that says so. It is true that in several things I did not agree, and as always, I did, always. But depending on the way of working, I resolved by consensus, which is the way we should all look for. Not to prevail our opinion, but to think, listen, think, respect. I think we should take into account the issue of prioritizing the issues, it will come very well to everyone, but particularly to our Region. Best regards Alberto Soto From: sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org <sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 04:39 pmFor: 'Alberto Soto' <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> CC: 'LACRALO Spanish' <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: RES: [lac-discuss-en] Note from Contracte Party House (CPH) on At-Large Review Hello Alberto, How are you? Could you explain and explain to all those who did not have the opportunity to participate in the mediation process personally both in Los Angeles in 2017 and in Puerto Rico in 2018, why do you think Mediation was a failure ??? I really do not understand, because both you and other members of LACRALO who were in the meetings did not comment at all in this respect at any time and specifically because at the end of each meeting there was a final moment so that everyone could express themselves about what they had experienced. the meetings. Especially in the meeting in Puerto Rico, very good ideas emerged and the understanding between the parties was excellent (at least that is how those present showed up). That is why I can not understand the CATEGORICAL manifestations that you and other members are manifesting in the list. This type of attitude confuses the rest of the community, when they receive news and comments from the meetings and suddenly messages appear on the list talking about the failure of the mediation process. And on the other hand, the process is not over yet! I personally believe that all the effort that Rodrigo de la Parra, the staff, the mediators, Humberto and Maritza and members of the participating community are genuine and productive. And I do believe in the mediation process as the only solution found by all after years of conflict. I would also like to know if someone has or wants to propose another solution, without a doubt that it will be welcomed by all. I believe that we must do now is to tell, clarify and discuss among all the community what we discussed and proposed in PR and continue working so that all the efforts placed in this mediation have the result we all want and not confuse the community with vague comments . Do not you agree with me, dear Alberto? And the same thing I ask Alejandro Pisanty who participated in the meeting in Los Angeles and unfortunately, at the last minute, I can not participate in the PR; but I know that he is always aware of everything. Greetings to all, Sylvia _______________________________________________ Sylvia Herlein Leite sylvia(a)internautabrasil.org LACRALO-ALAC Delegate to NomComm 2014-2016 From: lac-discuss-es [mailto: lac-discuss-es-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome by Alberto Soto Sent in: Sunday, May 20th, 2018 14: 54For: 'Alejandro Pisanty'Cc: 'LACRALO Espa� ol'Assunto: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Note from Contracte Party House (CPH) on At-Large Review As a candidate I answer now, totally in agreement with the comments and proposal of Alejandro. Best regards Alberto Soto. From: Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty(a)gmail.com> Posted on: Sunday, May 20, 2018 01:32 pmFor: Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> CC: LACRALO Spanish <lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] Note from Contracte Party House (CPH) on At-Large Review Alberto, Thank you for sharing these two statements of opinion from relevant groups of ICANN.While it is possible to disagree with aspects of each of them, especially the sectarian view that has taken over the NCSG, and others that will surely come, it is also possible to note that the complacency and lack of self-criticism that give rise to the ALAC proposal are being paid at a fair price. This is not without its clear reflection in LACRALO, where the failure of the mediation process manifests itself in the repetition of the vices mentioned in the Review, in which the same old quarrels that gave rise to the conflict have been revived in non-public forums. place to mediation, and above all, to continue without focus on the development of policies, which was the number one agreement of mediation in February 2017.The only way forward is to review ALAC's responses with deep self-criticism, and not allow them to be transmitted officially in our representation until they are satisfactory; and in parallel, focus the expenditure of energy, time and other resources of LACRALO to the proposals sutantivas. The representatives and officials of LACRALO must notify ALAC that a proposal will be prepared and process what is necessary to build it before, during and after the ongoing electoral process, with the commitment of the new entrants to carry it out immediately. Alejandro Pisanty 2018-05-20 10:23 GMT-05: 00 Alberto Soto <asoto(a)ibero-americano.org> : Dear, in the note of NSCG, this note of the Contracted Party House is mentioned, whose terms are similar for the At-Large Review. It is an unofficial translation and the short link to see the original published in ICANNhttps://goo.gl/NQzaVC Best regards Alberto Soto May 7, 2018 FAO: Organizational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) of ICANN Board and Cherine Chalaby, Chairman of the ICANN Board Re: Statement of concern for At-Large Review Implementation Implementation Proposal Dear members of Cherine and the Committee: On behalf of the Contracted Party House (CPH) I would like to express our deep concern with the content and intent of the General Proposal for Implementation of the At-Large Review, which was published on April 20, 2018. This proposal follows the 2017 At-Large Review.During the public comment period CPH, among many other SO / AC, sent critical comments that were subsequently included in the recommendations in the final report of ITEMS International. These recommendations, together with the feasibility assessment of the At-Large review and recommendations, and the ICANN staff designed the implementation plan with direct questions for ALAC. The CPH considers that the aforementioned proposal does not address these issues, nor does it respond to the specific criticisms raised in the At-Large review report. In fact, all the recommendations have been rejected or modified.Furthermore, if the proposal is adopted by the OEC and the ICANN Board without the ALAC properly addressing the concerns of the wider ICANN community, this would set an alarming precedent for any future ICANN review. If critical opinions and recommendations, particularly those that are widely supported within the ICANN community, are perceived as ultimately ignorant, The ICANN reviews will lose credibility. The CPH believes that the Organizational Effectiveness Committee of the ICANN Board should not consider the ALAC proposal until such time as ALAC provides a detailed response that addresses the criticisms raised by the At-Large review report, and the questions kindly gathered by the ICANN staff. This response must be submitted to the entire ICANN community, so that any additional input or discussion with the community can be arranged, to see the Review to an appropriate end. Yours sincerely, Graeme Bunton Chair RrSG _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing listlac-discuss-es@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-eshttp://www.lacralo.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro PisantyFaculty of Chemistry UNAMAv. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico + 52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD + 525541444475 FROM MEXICO SMS + 525541444475Blog:http://pisanty.blogspot.comLinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisantyUnete to the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisantyUnete to the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http: // www. isoc.org . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . to the UNAM group on LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty---- >> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . http://twitter.com/apisanty----> > Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .> Join ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [[--Original text (es) Translated by transbot 2.18-2.04 http://mm.icann.org/transbot_archive/33871c18e6.html --]]

1 0