- EURO-Discuss - lists.icann.org

Some comments
by Vittorio Bertola May 14, 2007

May 14, 2007

All, I have been abroad for the last few days, and I have been trying for a while to find the time to draw some personal conclusions from the last days of discussions, before we actually get to the vote. I am somewhat concerned by how difficult it is for many people on the list to work together. I have been knowing most of the people in this group for many years now, and I know that, while they might differ in background, attitudes and views of the world, they are all very capable and brilliant. It is known that election time is never a good time to build consensus, but I really hope that, over time, we can build better reciprocal understanding, and remove this sense of "we against them" which makes it difficult to advance things. I was the one first proposing that we could adopt appointments by consensus, as other Regions did. I really believed that we could have reached agreement, but it turned out that there was little desire to do so, possibly as a consequence of the fact that different people have different concepts of diversity and balance, so what seemed balanced to me did not seem so to others. There's nothing bad in going to votes to solve these difference, but I urge everyone not to see these elections, however they go, in terms of "someone wins and someone loses". Personally, I have been working voluntarily for years to build this thing, viewing it as a huge online space for dialogue that could create connections among organizations so diverse - in many terms, such as internal culture, geography, objectives etc - that value and new brilliant ideas could arise from this melting pot. We live in a society where all cultures come in touch the one with the other, and learning to live together with new cultures is one of the top problems for many European countries. I really expect that we will enroll several more organizations in the future; this will require effort both in reaching out to them and in accommodating their views, but this effort will be rewarded by the incredible energy and progress that stems from networks when they grow. This is why, by the way, I want to continue being involved in the EURALO process, and I decided to put forward my name for the Board. It would be a pity if this became a small playground for a few known faces that have been involved in ICANN since its beginnings; we have to be open and inclusive and encourage many new faces to come on board. I also found many constructive messages on the list, and I really hope that, past the elections, we can start working together on actual policy objectives. I'm looking forward to that moment! Ciao, -- vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <-------- --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <--------

1 0

Re: [EURO-Discuss] Keep the documentation
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 14, 2007

May 14, 2007

With respect to the staff point: FYI, my view of the staff role is that we are agnostic with respect to policy. With respect to process, we have an obligation to ensure that processes are protected, and where developed by the community, ensure equal access, transparenc, and respect for a rules-based framework for interaction in which every stakeholder is on an equal footing with every other. To that end, you have and will see periodic interventions about process and procedure, and sometimes suggestion of a new process or procedure in order to provide further avenues for the community to engage on issues or to solve a problem which the current process seems inadequate to facilitate. As to what policy to debate, and what to say, on this I have no views - not only as staff, but generally personally as well, though my personal views are effectively nil as it is my job to help you put yours forward, not to have any of my own put forward. On 13/05/07, Thomas Roessler <roessler(a)does-not-exist.org> wrote: > On 2007-05-11 08:12:29 -0700, Roberto Gaetano wrote: > > > From the attitude point of view, what is appalling, looking from > > the outside, is how a couple of people have inherited the Jeff > > William syndrome, > > *snip* > > If there's anything that this discussion shows, then it's a total > lack of willingness to build a compromise solution in the face of > differences of opinion, and some worrying lack of neutrality on the > staff side. > > The fact that you have nothing better to do than pull the Jeff > Williams card speaks more (and quite disappointingly so!) to your > ability to be objective, show leadership, and respect different > opinions, than it speaks to the RALO's functioning overall. > > (Though I'll admit that one conclusion that one might draw from this > entire debacle is that the RALO structure as such is neither > functional, nor robust. One of the underlying reasons for the > hesitation to sign the MoU on FITUG's behalf is that I was > struggling whether I should recommend returning the ALS > accreditation right away.) > > Regards, > -- > Thomas Roessler <roessler(a)does-not-exist.org> > > _______________________________________________ > EURO-Discuss mailing list > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.… > > Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

Re: [EURO-Discuss] ALAC
by Adam Peake May 11, 2007

May 11, 2007

Sebastian and Patrick: you both represent ISOC chapters, seem very active and "senior" within ISOC's European chapter organization generally. ISOC's policy for chapters <http://www.isoc.org/isoc/chapters/policy/> requires them to show some general level of support for the goals and mission of ISOC. Policy states "Specific officials of Chapters, acting on behalf of their Chapter, may make public statements and establish public positions as long as they meet the following requirement" and "b. They must not be contrary to any position of the Internet Society." Do you foresee any situation where your chapter's (i.e. ALS's) obligations to ISOC would require you to put ISOC's interests ahead of the EU RALO and or ALAC? For example, one could imagine situations where an ISOC position was contrary to that of the EU RALO and/or ALAC, or more extreme, perhaps some discussion regarding ISOC's contractual relationships with ICANN as the steward and beneficiary of .ORG? Where would your obligations lie? Apologies if this question is re-hashing an old discussion about ISOC chapters and ALAC, I haven't seen it if it is. Seems important particularly if two people from the same type of ALS are selected for ALAC. Thanks, Adam

6 11

Re: [EURO-Discuss] [EURO-ALS] Voting Porcedure
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 11, 2007

May 11, 2007

Verner: There are two problems with this: 1) The process of how to vote was agreed in Lisbon, so unless 2/3 of the ALSes intervene to reverse that decision, there is no grounds to reconsider, more than six weeks after the event. 2) Nothing would prevent you from noting preferences for only one, or two, out of the three, and not setting a second or a third preference. So, the effect you might achieve would be the same. On 11/05/07, W.Hülsmann (DVD e.V.) <huelsmann(a)datenschutzverein.de> wrote: > Hello Nick, > > there is a difference if all voters have two possible votes or if the > voters have to rank all three candidates. If I have two possible votes, > I can also vote only for one candidate and let my secend vote unused. > > Kind Regards, > > Werner > > Nick Ashton-Hart schrieb: > > Verner, and all: > > > > Could we please, instead of trying to find things to object to, try > > and find things to agree on. > > > > To repeat: there is no difference in the outcome whether one ranks > > three candidates, or whether you dispose of two individual votes for a > > candidate of three. > > > > HOWEVER: insisting on changing everything because one or two > > individuals want to change what was agreed by a much larger group of > > ALSes in Lisbon is basically the same as suggesting that any one ALS > > can veto any decision reached by a much larger group of ALSes. > > > > This would result in nothing ever being achieved. > > > > On 11/05/07, W.Hülsmann (DVD e.V.) <huelsmann(a)datenschutzverein.de> > > wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> my first question: "noon UTC" is 1 pm GMT? > >> > >> For the ALAC-Seats the rankingsystems makes for me no sense and it seems > >> to be not democratical for such a few seats to elecect. Therefor we > >> should use for the election of the ALAC-Seats tweo possible Votes for > >> each voter. > >> > >> Greatings, > >> > >> Werner > >> > >> Nick Ashton-Hart schrieb: > > > #################################################### > Vorratsdatenspeicherung? Nein Danke! - Noch ist es > nicht zu spät: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de > #################################################### > > -- > > Dipl. Inform. Werner Hülsmann > Vorstandsmitglied der Deutschen Vereinigung für Datenschutz (DVD) e.V. Obere Laube 48 - D-78462 Konstanz > Tel.: 07531 / 365905-6 Mobil: 0179 / 46 86 484 > E-Mail: huelsmann@datenschutzverein.dehttp://www.datenschutzverein.de > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

4 3

Re: [EURO-Discuss] [EURO-ALS] Voting Porcedure
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 11, 2007

May 11, 2007

I stand corrected - I was not in the meeting where the final voting procedure was adopted so my apologies. If all were to be ranked, then that is what we must stick with. On 11/05/07, Vittorio Bertola <vb(a)bertola.eu> wrote: > Nick Ashton-Hart ha scritto: > > 2) Nothing would prevent you from noting preferences for only one, or > > two, out of the three, and not setting a second or a third preference. > > So, the effect you might achieve would be the same. > > First, let me state that I do not like this voting system at all. > However, this was what was adopted in Lisbon by a meeting where most > ALSes were present, including Christoph and Wolfgang (so not just ISOC > chapters), so I think that, for the sake of closing this painful process > which reminds me of the worst days of icannatlarge.com, we'd better live > with it for the time being. > > However, and this was discussed in Lisbon, there is a requirement that > you rank ALL candidates. This is because, with this system, the best > candidates are the ones whose sum of rankings is the lowest. So for > example in this case: > > Voter 1: 1. Candidate A, 2. Candidate B, 3. Candidate C > Voter 2: 1. Candidate B, 2. Candidate C, 3. Candidate A > > the final result would be: > > 1. Candidate B = 3 points > 2. Candidate A = 4 points > 3. Candidate C = 5 points > > However, if Voter 2 did not rank Candidate A (possibly because he/she > thinks that A is a really bad person), and only stated two preferences, > A would not get points and so the result would be: > > 1. Candidate A = 1 point > 2. Candidate B = 4 points > 3. Candidate C = 5 points > > which is the exact opposite of what Voter 2 would have liked to get. > > This is why there is the need to rank all candidates, none excluded... > so that the ones you really don't like get a lot of points from you and > sink down the list :-) > -- > vb. Vittorio Bertola - vb [a] bertola.eu <-------- > --------> finally with a new website at http://bertola.eu/ <-------- > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

ISOC launches Call for PIR Board Member Nominations
by Patrick Vande Walle May 11, 2007

May 11, 2007

This may be of interest fro some of you. Please distribute as you see fit. Full text at http://www.isoc.org/isoc/media/releases/070511.shtml The Internet Society (ISOC) seeks a maximum of three highly qualified individuals to serve on the Board of Directors of the Public Interest Registry (PIR) for the period 2008-2010. PIR’s business is managing an international registry of .org domain names. The Board meets in person 3-4 times per year. The time commitment is approximately 14-18 full days per year plus additional phone calls and e-mail. Qualifications sought include: * Demonstrated business acumen with significant entrepreneurial, non-commercial and/or marketing skills; * understanding and engagement in the retail domain name space; * known contributor to the ICANN <http://www.icann.org> processes; * financial literacy; * expertise in the application of Internet technologies to support non-commercial organizations; and * experience with the operation and policies of TLD registries. Global diversity in candidates is desired. Please forward a statement of interest and qualifications, three references, and a curriculum vitae highlighting relevant experience, expertise, and contact information to: Lynn St. Amour, President and CEO, Internet Society Email: pir-nomcomm(a)isoc.org <mailto:pir-nomcomm@isoc.org>. Please submit materials in attached documents (pdf, .doc, .txt) For full consideration, please apply by June 11th, 2007. Applications will be evaluated as they are received.

1 0

Re: [EURO-Discuss] [EURO-ALS] Voting Porcedure
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 11, 2007

May 11, 2007

See below On 11/05/07, W.Hülsmann (DVD e.V.) <huelsmann(a)datenschutzverein.de> wrote: > Hello Nick, > > Nick Ashton-Hart schrieb: > > Verner: > > > Don't you have an "W" on your PC? :-) Apologies; naughty to misspell people's names :( > > There are two problems with this: > > > > 1) The process of how to vote was agreed in Lisbon, > I understood you, that this agreement was made for the election of the > EURALA Board and not for the ALAC seats The agreement covered the entire election process. > > 2) Nothing would prevent you from noting preferences for only one, or > > two, out of the three, and not setting a second or a third preference. > > So, the effect you might achieve would be the same. > Sorry, but in the WIKI you have written: "The ballot will work as > follows: 1. Each voter will rank, in order of preference, ALL the ALAC > candidates." > That was my emphasis more than anything. Werner, if you have a burning desire to vote for less than the two representatives that the region needs to actually select, and only want to vote for one and let the others choose the second one without your vote, I'm happy to configure the voting system to allow people to not select from the entire field. > And the word "ALL" is in Capital Letters. Also would be a vote not legal > if there is only one ore two preferences! > Look, you cannot have it both ways. You cannot say "I want to vote for only one or two" and then say "If I do what I want, the vote will be illegal". Is this a productive discussion, to go around in circles? I can't say that I see the value in it. > Kind Regards, > > Werner > > #################################################### > Vorratsdatenspeicherung? Nein Danke! - Noch ist es > nicht zu spät: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de > #################################################### > > -- > > Dipl. Inform. Werner Hülsmann > Vorstandsmitglied der Deutschen Vereinigung für Datenschutz (DVD) e.V. Obere Laube 48 - D-78462 Konstanz > Tel.: 07531 / 365905-6 Mobil: 0179 / 46 86 484 > E-Mail: huelsmann@datenschutzverein.dehttp://www.datenschutzverein.de > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

Re: [EURO-Discuss] [EURO-ALS] Voting Porcedure
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 11, 2007

May 11, 2007

Verner, and all: Could we please, instead of trying to find things to object to, try and find things to agree on. To repeat: there is no difference in the outcome whether one ranks three candidates, or whether you dispose of two individual votes for a candidate of three. HOWEVER: insisting on changing everything because one or two individuals want to change what was agreed by a much larger group of ALSes in Lisbon is basically the same as suggesting that any one ALS can veto any decision reached by a much larger group of ALSes. This would result in nothing ever being achieved. On 11/05/07, W.Hülsmann (DVD e.V.) <huelsmann(a)datenschutzverein.de> wrote: > Hello, > > my first question: "noon UTC" is 1 pm GMT? > > For the ALAC-Seats the rankingsystems makes for me no sense and it seems > to be not democratical for such a few seats to elecect. Therefor we > should use for the election of the ALAC-Seats tweo possible Votes for > each voter. > > Greatings, > > Werner > > Nick Ashton-Hart schrieb: > > Verner: > > > > Thank you for your note. The first vote will be to decide whether or > > not the single ALS who is not a party to the MoU will be voting on the > > ALAC members and the board members. > > > > That vote will start today. > > > > With respect to the ranking system: This is what was decided in Lisbon > > as the procedure to be used, and so that procedure is carried forward > > to the actual vote. It is the same process that was strongly > > recommended with respect to the board seats, so on a practical level > > it makes sense to use only one type of voting on one ballot to reduce > > confusion. > > > > On 11/05/07, W.Hülsmann (DVD e.V.) <huelsmann(a)datenschutzverein.de> > > wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> on https://st.icann.org/euralo/index.cgi?euralo_elections_2007 I read: > >> > >> "VOTERS: The designated voters (1 per ALS) of ALSes who have signed the > >> Memorandum of Understanding with ICANN either in-person at the Lisbon > >> ICANN meeting or digitally via electronic mail - at any time before the > >> beginning of the voting" > >> > >> There must be a mistake: First of all we have to decide, if this "strong > >> recommendation" will be accepted. > >> > >> Next: If there are two seats we have to vote for ALAC, then every voter > >> should have two possible votes. The two candidates with the most votes > >> will be elected. This is the democratical way of election. There ist no > >> need for such a ranking. > >> > >> After the election of the two members for the ALAC seats we have two > >> decide, how many seats shall the EURALO board have. The election of the > >> EURALO boad members can't start before we know how many board members > >> are to elect. > >> > >> Kind Regarts, > >> > >> Werner Hülsmann > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > #################################################### > Vorratsdatenspeicherung? Nein Danke! - Noch ist es > nicht zu spät: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de > #################################################### > > -- > > Dipl. Inform. Werner Hülsmann > Vorstandsmitglied der Deutschen Vereinigung für Datenschutz (DVD) e.V. Obere Laube 48 - D-78462 Konstanz > Tel.: 07531 / 365905-6 Mobil: 0179 / 46 86 484 > E-Mail: huelsmann@datenschutzverein.dehttp://www.datenschutzverein.de > > > _______________________________________________ > EURO-ALS mailing list > EURO-ALS(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-als_atlarge-lists.ican… > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

4 4

Re: [EURO-Discuss] [EURO-ALS] Voting Porcedure
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 11, 2007

May 11, 2007

Verner: Thank you for your note. The first vote will be to decide whether or not the single ALS who is not a party to the MoU will be voting on the ALAC members and the board members. That vote will start today. With respect to the ranking system: This is what was decided in Lisbon as the procedure to be used, and so that procedure is carried forward to the actual vote. It is the same process that was strongly recommended with respect to the board seats, so on a practical level it makes sense to use only one type of voting on one ballot to reduce confusion. On 11/05/07, W.Hülsmann (DVD e.V.) <huelsmann(a)datenschutzverein.de> wrote: > Hello, > > on https://st.icann.org/euralo/index.cgi?euralo_elections_2007 I read: > > "VOTERS: The designated voters (1 per ALS) of ALSes who have signed the > Memorandum of Understanding with ICANN either in-person at the Lisbon > ICANN meeting or digitally via electronic mail - at any time before the > beginning of the voting" > > There must be a mistake: First of all we have to decide, if this "strong > recommendation" will be accepted. > > Next: If there are two seats we have to vote for ALAC, then every voter > should have two possible votes. The two candidates with the most votes > will be elected. This is the democratical way of election. There ist no > need for such a ranking. > > After the election of the two members for the ALAC seats we have two > decide, how many seats shall the EURALO board have. The election of the > EURALO boad members can't start before we know how many board members > are to elect. > > Kind Regarts, > > Werner Hülsmann > > > #################################################### > Vorratsdatenspeicherung? Nein Danke! - Noch ist es > nicht zu spät: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de > #################################################### > > -- > > Dipl. Inform. Werner Hülsmann > Vorstandsmitglied der Deutschen Vereinigung für Datenschutz (DVD) e.V. > Obere Laube 48 - D-78462 Konstanz > Tel.: 07531 / 365905-6 Mobil: 0179 / 46 86 484 > E-Mail: huelsmann@datenschutzverein.dehttp://www.datenschutzverein.de > > > _______________________________________________ > EURO-ALS mailing list > EURO-ALS(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-als_atlarge-lists.ican… > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

6 7

Further Update to the Elections Page
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 11, 2007

May 11, 2007

Dear All: In order to accomodate all proposals with respect to the number of board seats, I have modified the page above. I hope that we can now move on to other conversations, since what is reflected below allows the voters to decide between all of the proposals received related to the board and the size of the board. --- 2007 EURALO Election Details As posted by email by the ICANN staff, incorporating the decisions recommended to the region on the teleconference of 4 May 2007. ELECTION PERIOD: Five Calendar Days, beginning at Noon UTC on the date when the ballot has completed testing, and ending on at Noon UTC on the 5th day. VOTERS: The designated voters (1 per ALS) of ALSes who have signed the Memorandum of Understanding with ICANN either in-person at the Lisbon ICANN meeting or digitally via electronic mail - at any time before the beginning of the voting - Text available from the RALO Organising Instruments page. Current list of MOU signatories can be found at: the MoU Signatories page. CANDIDATES: All those nominated up to the end of the teleconference on 4th May 2007 (see below for complete list) NUMBER OF BOARD SEATS: The strong recommendation of those on the teleconference was that there should be 7 members of the initial board. Since there were objections to this number, then the call's strong recommendation is that there should be a section on the ballot for each voter to pick from amongst the following options for the number of total seats: 5, 7, 9. A subsequent proposal was received to adopt the entire slate of candidates. PROPOSED COMPROMISE: The selection on the ballot would allow each voter to select from the following options: 5,7,9, All eligible candidates Voting For the ALAC Candidates: The ballot will work as follows: Each voter will rank, in order of preference, ALL the ALAC candidates. The voting system will then produce a list, which incorporates the preferences expressed. The candidate receiving the highest preference across all preference votes cast will show at the top of the list; the next-highest directly underneath, and the third preference at the bottom. Since the GC office has ruled that the candidature of Ms. Cretu is in order, there will be three candidates. The terms of the two seats are staggered. Whichever candidate receives the highest preference from amongst all the ranked votes cast shall have the two-year term. The candidate receiving the next- highest ranking shall receive the one year term. The two candidates receiving the highest aggregated preference votes shall be elected. The remaining candidate, (if any) will be subject to election to the Board (see below for details) Voting For the EURALO Board: The ballot for the board will list all of the current nominees for board seats, of which there are eleven (11) (reproduced below and also at Meeting Notes 4 May 2007. This list includes two of the three candidates for ALAC seats,as one candidate has withdrawn his name from consideration for a Board seat. The candidate for an ALAC seat who does not get elected, may be seated as a board member (but see below). No candidate for ALAC may be elected to both an ALAC seat AND a board seat, however. The actual ballot will work as follows: Each voter will rank, in order of preference, ALL the board nominees. The voting system will then produce a list, which incorporates the preferences expressed. The board members who will be elected are the top 'N' listed, from the top of the list on down. The Number 'N' shall be either: that number from the selection above (5,7,9) which receives the most votes., or If the number of candidates from the selection above entitled 'All Candidates' receives a majorit of the votes, then all candidates shall be seated. TERM OF BOARD MEMBERS: It was not decided on the call how to determine which board members would receive one year terms, and which would receive two, as per the Bylaws, Clause 9.5.2. Therefore, the staff recommends the following: The top 1/2 of the list of preferences from the board election (rounded to the nearest whole number, depending upon the number of seats), will receive two-year terms, and the bottom 1/2 will receive one-year terms. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO OBJECT TO THIS PROCEDURE as this is simply a staff proposal. Keep in mind, however, that it might be viewed as less than ideal to have another ballot, immediately after the first, to decide who shall have what length of term from amongst those elected. VOTING MECHANISM: At-Large uses a voting system provided by BigPulse (www.bigpulse.com) The authorised voter will receive an individualised email, with a clickable link as well as manual login instructions, which are individually-generated. The system will be setup to provide a secret ballot, and the ICANN staff will ensure that the system produces a reminder email 48 hours before the vote closes, and then again 24 hours before the vote closes, to any voter who has not yet voted to help ensure that they do cast a vote. We will also setup a URL where anyone will be able to see the results of the vote for themselves to ensure transparency with respect to the results. This URL will be forwarded to both European email lists. CANDIDATES LIST Christian Name Surname ALS (Country of ALS) Country of Residence Nationality Nominating ALS Board Candidate (Y/N) ALAC Candidate (2 seats) Notes Patrick Vande Walle ISOC Luxembourg (Luxembourg) Luxembourg Belgium ISOC Luxembourg (Self) SN: 07/04/07 Sébastien Bachollet ISOC France (France) France France ISOC Bulgaria (D Pefeva) Nom: Dessi Veronica Cretu netzwerk neue medien (Germany) Moldava Moldova Medienstadt Leipzig (W Kleinwachter) Nom: Wolfgang Rudi Vansnick ISOC Belgium (Belgium) Belgium Belgium ISOC Belgium (Self) Yes Vittorio Bertola ISOC Italy (Italy) Italy Italy ISOC Italy (Self) Yes Christoph Bruch GCLU (Germany) Germany Germany ISOC Italy (V Bertola), Medienstadt Leipzig (W Kleinwachter) Yes Desiree Miloshevic United Kingdom Serbia Medienstadt Leipzig (W Kleinwachter) Yes Bill Drake Switzerland USA Medienstadt Leipzig (W Kleinwachter) Yes Jeanette Hofmann Germany Germany Medienstadt Leipzig (W Kleinwachter) Yes Karen Banks UK Australia netzwerk neue medien (A Muehlberg) Yes Wolf Ludwig Switzerland Germany netzwerk neue medien (A Muehlberg) Yes member of Communica.ch, an ALS candidate organisation Paco de Quito ISOC CAT (Spain) Spain Spain ISOC Bulgaria (D Pefeva) Yes Sebastien Bachollet ISOC France (France) France France N/A (ALAC Candidate) Yes (ALAC Candidate) Veronica Cretu netzwerk neue medien (Germany) Moldova Moldova N/A (ALAC Candidate) Yes (ALAC Candidate) For the two ALAC seats Patrick Vande Walle Sebastien Bachollet Veronica Cretu For the EURALO Board Rudi Vansnick Vittorio Bertola Christoph Bruch Desiree Miloshevic Bill Drake Jeanette Hofmann Karen Banks Wolf Ludwig Paco de Qinto Patrick Vande Walle Sebastien Bachollet Veronica Cretu Created by Nick Ashton-Hart on May 5 7:38am. Updated by Nick Ashton- Hart on May 11 7:33am. edit - comment -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director, At-Large ICANN PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom Main Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011] USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0