- EURO-Discuss - lists.icann.org

Nominees, country of origin and residence
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 8, 2007

May 8, 2007

Dear colleagues: I have updated the nominations page to show the nominees, the country of residence and nationality, and the other factors relevant to being selected. For example, the Bylaws provide that the first five board seats must be individuals from different countries. This could make the selection process simpler, as there are 12 candidates and some of them are residents or nationals of the same country, whilst others are not. Could you all look at this, and if information is missing, fill it in? SOme might also be incorrect; you can fix that too. Thanks to Sebastian for pointing that this might make a consensus decision easier and for helping provide much of the information now on the page. The page once again is: https://st.icann.org/euralo/index.cgi?euralo_elections_2007 -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

Re: [EURO-Discuss] {Spam?}
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 8, 2007

May 8, 2007

That is true - I hope that my various emails made clear the 'strong recommendation' nature of the outcomes of the teleconference. On 08/05/07, "Kleinwächter"@smtp01.icann.org <"Kleinwächter"@smtp01.icann.org> wrote: > Just for clarification. > > My memory tells me that the telephone conference last Friday did not make "decisions" but formulated "strong recommendations". Each recognized ALS is a sovereign entity and has the right to veto or opt out. The problem is that obviously we have a fundamental problem to find consensus over procedures. > > Insofar we have to go through the painful continuation of the debate to look for a compromise which reflects the divided reality in the EURALO in a fair and balanced way. It is certainly against the rule if from about 20 recognized units only seven units take part in a telephone conference and claim this as the "final word". > > While I am in favour of moving forward fast, we should not do it at any price. We had no EURALO Board and elected European ALAC members for four years. It would not be a desaster, if we wait another two or six months to streamline our conflicts and to cerate the necessary confidence for a frutiful cooperation if it comes to substance. > > Best regards > > Wolfgang > > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

Re: [EURO-Discuss] transparency on changes of rules
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 8, 2007

May 8, 2007

Firstly, thanks very much for the comments; as you know this decision is up to the signers of the MoU to make. I'm sure that they will take on board your thoughts. Just to be completely clear though, Communica.ch is not at present an accredited ALS, so whether or not you were willing to become a party to the MoU, at the present time your organisation would not be eligible until the status of your application is dealt with, which is as I understand it pending either: 1) Amendment of your Bylaws, or; 2) the adoption of the applications criteria evaluation process which the ALAC is to decide one way or the other later today. After either or both of these events your application could be voted on by ALAC. On 08/05/07, Wolf Ludwig <wolf.ludwig(a)comunica-ch.net> wrote: > Dear Nick, > > some weeks ago, I think shortly after Lisbon, I expressed my willingness to sign the MoU > -- but our application is still pending (because we have to do formal modifications in > our bylaws to meet the requirements -- what we can provide already in fact, but bylaw > modifications are taking time as we only have one general assembly a year!). > > As far as I know, there are several confirmed ALS which have internal democratic > consultation and decision-making processes prior to come up with an external > obligation (such as signing a MoU etc.) Some of those ALS are mere volunteer > organisations and decent democratic processes are thereby taking time, as we know. > > Therefore I find it somehow inappropriate "to punish" those small volunteer orgs. by > restricting their voting rights in this start-up process for creating a first EURALO board. > Even if it may be an option in the MoU, as it was quoted, it doesn't make sense to me > under the given circumstances. We shouldn't start EURALO as a two-classes society > or as a regional structure of different speeds. I think we need other political signals > and encouragements for a vivid EURALO future! > > Regards, > Wolf > > Nick Ashton-Hart wrote Tue, 8 May 2007 11:45: > >See below: > > > >On 08/05/07, Annette Muehlberg <annette.muehlberg(a)web.de> wrote: > >> Dear Nick, > >> > >> You just wrote: > >> "Whilst no impediment to participating in the work of the organisation > >> is otherwise envisaged, it was strongly felt that only ALSes who are a > >> party to the MoU with ICANN should cast votes in the upcoming election." > >> > >> It is hard to understand the deeper significance of this sentence, > >> especially for non-native english speakers. > >> > > > >A thousand pardons - that is a rather unfortunate sentence. > > > >To clarify: > > > >On the teleconference, it was unanimously expressed that only ALSes > >who had signed the MoU prior to the vote should be eligible to vote. > > > >> After Lisbon I talked with you on the phone about the rights of ALSes > >> who did not sign the MOU. You said, that there is no difference > >> concerning voting rights in comparison to those who signed it. > >> > >> After our talk you wrote on the list: > >> "At the present time, NO LIMITATIONS ON NON-SIGNING ALSes HAVE BEEN > >> PROPOSED OR AGREED. Therefore, ALL ALSes IN EUROPE HAVE FULL RIGHTS TO > >> PARTICIPATE IN ALL ASPECTS OF THE EURALO. There has been some question > >> about this raised in previous emails. I hope this reinforces that there > >> is nothing to worry about." > >> > >> Based on your mail, all accredited ALSes could expect to have voting > >> rights without limitations. But according to your latest mail it seems > >> that restrictions occured to those who did not sign and voting rights > >> have been limited to MOU signers - except they would sign within the > >> next two days. > >> How can you expect that volunteer representatives of our ALSes can meet > >> such short term deadlines? > >> > >> So, if inbetween your two eMails (mentioned above) limitations on rights > >> of ALSes have been introduced: what changes exactly were made? why? > >> when? by whom? > >> > > > >As mentioned above, this was the unanimous view of those participating > >on the teleconference on 4th May. > > > >I remember our call, and also my email on the subject, but please > >remember: the MoU always provided for the ability of the signing > >organisations to limit certain aspects of participation by non-signing > >organisations. > > > >This was put in not really in relation to the current ALSes but > >because in the future, there will be entirely new ALSes, and those who > >are a part of the MoU may wish to require them to 'sign up' to the MoU > >in order to participate in some ways. Equally, signers may not care to > >impose any conditions - it was deliberately left flexible. > > > >As to the timeframe to sign up, it would be incorrect to say that they > >have only two days to make this decision. In truth, the MoU has been > >signed now for more than a month; those who had not yet indicated > >their digital signature could have done so at any time between the > >signing ceremony on 30th March to the present date. > > > >Please remember that these decisions are up to you and if you wish to > >object, you can object. > > > >That would I think delay the vote on the ALAC members and the board, > >which would be unfortunate; the signing organisations would then need > >to conduct a separate vote on whether or not non-signers could vote, > >and only after that vote could we then conduct the election. > > > >> Best > >> Annette > >> > > > > > >-- > >-- > >Regards, > > > >Nick Ashton-Hart > >PO Box 32160 > >London N4 2XY > >United Kingdom > >UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 > >USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 > >Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 > >mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 > >Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / > >Skype: nashtonhart > >Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart > > > >_______________________________________________ > >EURO-Discuss mailing list > >EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.… > > > > comunica-ch > phone +41 79 204 83 87 > www.comunica-ch.net > > _______________________________________________ > EURO-Discuss mailing list > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.… > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

Re: [EURO-Discuss] transparency on changes of rules
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 8, 2007

May 8, 2007

See below: On 08/05/07, Annette Muehlberg <annette.muehlberg(a)web.de> wrote: > Dear Nick, > > You just wrote: > "Whilst no impediment to participating in the work of the organisation > is otherwise envisaged, it was strongly felt that only ALSes who are a > party to the MoU with ICANN should cast votes in the upcoming election." > > It is hard to understand the deeper significance of this sentence, > especially for non-native english speakers. > A thousand pardons - that is a rather unfortunate sentence. To clarify: On the teleconference, it was unanimously expressed that only ALSes who had signed the MoU prior to the vote should be eligible to vote. > After Lisbon I talked with you on the phone about the rights of ALSes > who did not sign the MOU. You said, that there is no difference > concerning voting rights in comparison to those who signed it. > > After our talk you wrote on the list: > "At the present time, NO LIMITATIONS ON NON-SIGNING ALSes HAVE BEEN > PROPOSED OR AGREED. Therefore, ALL ALSes IN EUROPE HAVE FULL RIGHTS TO > PARTICIPATE IN ALL ASPECTS OF THE EURALO. There has been some question > about this raised in previous emails. I hope this reinforces that there > is nothing to worry about." > > Based on your mail, all accredited ALSes could expect to have voting > rights without limitations. But according to your latest mail it seems > that restrictions occured to those who did not sign and voting rights > have been limited to MOU signers - except they would sign within the > next two days. > How can you expect that volunteer representatives of our ALSes can meet > such short term deadlines? > > So, if inbetween your two eMails (mentioned above) limitations on rights > of ALSes have been introduced: what changes exactly were made? why? > when? by whom? > As mentioned above, this was the unanimous view of those participating on the teleconference on 4th May. I remember our call, and also my email on the subject, but please remember: the MoU always provided for the ability of the signing organisations to limit certain aspects of participation by non-signing organisations. This was put in not really in relation to the current ALSes but because in the future, there will be entirely new ALSes, and those who are a part of the MoU may wish to require them to 'sign up' to the MoU in order to participate in some ways. Equally, signers may not care to impose any conditions - it was deliberately left flexible. As to the timeframe to sign up, it would be incorrect to say that they have only two days to make this decision. In truth, the MoU has been signed now for more than a month; those who had not yet indicated their digital signature could have done so at any time between the signing ceremony on 30th March to the present date. Please remember that these decisions are up to you and if you wish to object, you can object. That would I think delay the vote on the ALAC members and the board, which would be unfortunate; the signing organisations would then need to conduct a separate vote on whether or not non-signers could vote, and only after that vote could we then conduct the election. > Best > Annette > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

2 1

Re: [EURO-Discuss] transparency on changes of rules
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 8, 2007

May 8, 2007

That is exactly the case. The provisions were meant to be flexible though - if those who signed decided to let those who do not sign - now or in the future - vote, then nothing stops the signatories from decididng to allow that. The reverse is also the case. As to your point about whether the MoU has any impact on non-signers, you are of course correct that it only binds those who are a party to it. Note that these are two separate questions though. On 08/05/07, Roberto Gaetano <roberto(a)icann.org> wrote: > I don't know what was the past correspondence, and I assume that this is a > question that ultimately will end, for a change :<(, with the lawyers, but > my understanding since the beginning was that the relationship between ICANN > and EURALO, including the modus operandi of EURALO within ALAC, was going to > be governed by the MoU. > > As a matter of fact, re-reading the documents (AoA & MoU) I see that the > election of EURALO representatives is covered in articles 1.2.5 and 5.4.1 of > the MoU. I wonder how the MoU could extend legally to organizations like > ALSes that do not sign the MoU. Of course, in the beginning we all thought > of an MoU signed by EURALO with ICANN, and implicitely adopted by each ALS > by joining the EURALO, but since we went the road of individual signatures > for the MoU, by the same toke we must assume that the MoU takes force only > for the ALSes who have signed it, not for the others. Who, if they do not > want to sign, will remain unaffected by MoU obligations, but also unaffected > by MoU advantages. > > Where does this not make sense? > > Cheers, > Roberto > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > [mailto:euro-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On > > Behalf Of Annette Muehlberg > > Sent: 08 May 2007 12:11 > > To: Nick Ashton-Hart ICANN > > Cc: EURALO Discussion > > Subject: [EURO-Discuss] transparency on changes of rules > > > > Dear Nick, > > > > You just wrote: > > "Whilst no impediment to participating in the work of the > > organisation is otherwise envisaged, it was strongly felt > > that only ALSes who are a party to the MoU with ICANN should > > cast votes in the upcoming election." > > > > It is hard to understand the deeper significance of this > > sentence, especially for non-native english speakers. > > > > After Lisbon I talked with you on the phone about the rights > > of ALSes who did not sign the MOU. You said, that there is no > > difference concerning voting rights in comparison to those > > who signed it. > > > > After our talk you wrote on the list: > > "At the present time, NO LIMITATIONS ON NON-SIGNING ALSes > > HAVE BEEN PROPOSED OR AGREED. Therefore, ALL ALSes IN EUROPE > > HAVE FULL RIGHTS TO PARTICIPATE IN ALL ASPECTS OF THE EURALO. > > There has been some question about this raised in previous > > emails. I hope this reinforces that there is nothing to worry about." > > > > Based on your mail, all accredited ALSes could expect to have > > voting rights without limitations. But according to your > > latest mail it seems that restrictions occured to those who > > did not sign and voting rights have been limited to MOU > > signers - except they would sign within the next two days. > > How can you expect that volunteer representatives of our > > ALSes can meet such short term deadlines? > > > > So, if inbetween your two eMails (mentioned above) > > limitations on rights of ALSes have been introduced: what > > changes exactly were made? why? > > when? by whom? > > > > Best > > Annette > > > > _______________________________________________ > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_a > > tlarge-lists.icann.org > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

Current List of MoU Signatories / Non-Signatories
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 8, 2007

May 8, 2007

Dear All: This has been updated to reflect one error (ISOC Bulgaria in both lists), and the new addition of DVD to the list of signers https://st.icann.org/euralo/index.cgi?mou_signatories --- Current ALS parties to the MoU of ICANN, signed 29th March 2007 in person, or who have signed electronically afterwards: Suomen Internet-yhdistys ry. (ISOC Finland) Internet Society - Bulgaria Medienstadt Leipzig e.V. Internet Society Belgium Internet Society Luxembourg Chapitre français de l’Internet Society – ISOC France Società Internet ISOC CAT (CATALAN CHAPTER) Humanistische Union e.V. (German Civil Liberties Union) Netzwerk Neue Medien (nnm) Komitee Fur Eine Demokratische UNO (Committee For A Democratic United Nations) Deutsche Vereinigung für Datenschutz (DVD) e.V. List of Accredited ALSes Who Have Not Become a Party to the MoU Terre des Femmes E.v. FIfF IIAV FoeBud e.V. ISOC NL FITUG -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director, At-Large ICANN PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom Main Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011] USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

Re: [EURO-Discuss] Giovanni Seppia joins EURid asInternationalRelations Manager
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 7, 2007

May 7, 2007

I would like to echo publicly my agreement with Roberto's sentiments here - even if my tenure doesn't extend back as far as Roberto's does :) On 04/05/07, Roberto Gaetano <roberto(a)icann.org> wrote: > I would like to acknowledge all the work done by Giovanni to help ALAC, and > in particular EURALO, in overcoming difficult moments. Some of the newer > folks might not be aware of what a great help he has been, going often much > beyond his bare professional duties, and really sharing with us the > willingness to bring this bird off the ground. > > See you in Puerto Rico? > > Ciao, > Roberto > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > [mailto:euro-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On > > Behalf Of Giovanni Seppia > > Sent: 04 May 2007 09:21 > > To: patrick(a)vande-walle.eu; 'Discussion for At-Large Europe' > > Subject: Re: [EURO-Discuss] Giovanni Seppia joins EURid > > asInternationalRelations Manager > > > > Patrick, All, > > > > I was going to send a message to this list during these days > > to say ciao to all of you. It is a "ciao", not a good bye as > > I am sure I will keep seeing you during ICANN meetings and > > other Internet related events. > > > > The decision was not easy and I thought I could not miss the > > opportunity I was presented. > > > > I believe that, once all the "bureaucratic" aspects are > > sorted out, At Large will represent a fundamental component > > of the ICANN process, a component which should bring the > > interests, needs and expectations of the end users to > > ICANN'attention. It is not an easy task, but during my time > > at ICANN and my time with the representatives of the European > > At Large organisation I have seen that there are very > > valuable and motivated people that will accomplish it. Do not give up! > > > > I hope I have been helpful as much as I could and I look > > forward to seeing you all in the future, > > > > Best, > > > > Giovanni > > > > > > > > > > > > Giovanni Seppia > > ICANN Global Partnership European Liaison > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > [mailto:euro-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On > > Behalf Of Patrick Vande Walle > > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 9:13 AM > > To: Discussion for At-Large Europe > > Subject: [EURO-Discuss] Giovanni Seppia joins EURid as > > InternationalRelations Manager > > > > [Since many of you here know Giovanni, I thought this would > > be of interest to you -Patrick] > > http://www.eurid.eu/content/view/202/33/lang,en/ > > > > Giovanni will take on the role of International Relations > > Manager of EURid as from May 14, 2007. The position has been > > newly created and includes being responsible for EURid's > > relations with relevant International organizations, such as > > ICANN (the International body overseeing all top level > > domains) and CENTR (Council of European National Top Level > > Domain Registries) as well as other international bodies. > > Furthermore, he will represent EURid in international fora. > > In this role he will report to the general manager. > > > > "International relations play an important role for any top > > level domain, and especially for .eu which is transnational > > in its nature. > > Therefore, I am very satisfied that we managed to get > > Giovanni onboard. > > I am sure that with his long experience and extensive network > > he will contribute in a significant way to EURid's further > > development in this field," commented Marc Van Wesemael, > > EURid's General Manager. > > > > Giovanni previously worked at ICANN as European Regional > > Liaison. Prior to that he was the General Manager at CENTR. > > He has also served as Head of External Relations of the > > Italian Registry (ITT CNR) and has three years of experience > > at the European Commission in various roles. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_a > > tlarge-lists.i > > cann.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_a > > tlarge-lists.icann.org > > > _______________________________________________ > EURO-Discuss mailing list > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.… > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

4 3

Legal Advice needed on a candidate for one of the elected European ALAC seats
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 5, 2007

May 5, 2007

Dear Sue and Dan: I have been asked by a group of the European ALS members to get a view for them on the following questions related to the candidature of Veronica Cretu for one of the two EURALO-elected ALAC seats. The background: Ms. Cretu was nominated for the seat, and accepted the nomination, in advance of a deadline for receiving nominations of 20th April. It became clear after the nominations period closed that Ms. Cretu was not a member of any accredited ALS in the European region. Annette Muehlberg, the ALAC member appointed by the NomCom for the European Region, and official representative of the Network New Media ALS located in Germany, then announced by email that Ms. Cretu was now a member of the same ALS. Ms. Cretu is herself a national of Moldova. The MoU with ICANN provides, in Clause 5.4.1, attached and as follows: "The EURALO will choose two (2) individuals to serve as representatives on the At Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) and other bodies as appropriate in the terms specified in the ICANN Bylaws. The voting rights shall be determined by the EURALO. The selected representatives must be members of different ALSes, must have their principal residence in different countries of the region and their nationalities must be different, save always that the EURALO may define additional diversity requirements. Selected representatives will have the responsibilities described in the ICANN Bylaws. " Likewise, the Bylaws of the EURALO provide as follows in connection with this situation: "11.5 The General Assembly is responsible, without limitation, for the following matters: [...] 11.5.10 Electing the ALAC members representing Europe. The selected representatives must be members of different ALSes, must have their principal residence in different countries of the region and their nationalities must be different. To the extent possible, gender balance and regional balance within Europe shall be fostered." The questions the region needs answered, in order to be assured of avoiding any unintentional violations of either the letter or the spirit of the rules and procedures, are as follows: 1) Since the nominations closed on 20th April and the candidate was not at that time a member of any ALS, is her candidature forfeit? 2) Since she is now a member of the same ALS (from Germany) as the NomCom representative Annette Muehlberg who is herself also a German national, does this invalidate her candidature? Be advised that the answers to these questions need to be forwarded directly to the community in question, and are urgently needed as the elections are due to start at Noon UTC on Friday 11th May. -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director, At-Large ICANN PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom Main Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011] USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

3 2

Outcomes of the Teleconference: EURALO Voting and Ballot Details
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 5, 2007

May 5, 2007

2007 EURALO Election Details* Incorporating the decisions recommended to the region on the teleconference of 4 May 2007 ELECTION PERIOD: Noon UTC, Friday 11 May to Noon UTC, Wednesday 16th May. VOTERS: The designated voters (1 per ALS) of ALSes who have signed the Memorandum of Understanding with ICANN either in-person at the Lisbon ICANN meeting or digitally via electronic mail - at any time before the beginning of the voting - Text available from the RALO Organising Instruments page. CANDIDATES: All those nominated up to the end of the teleconference on 4th May 2007 (see below for complete list) NUMBER OF BOARD SEATS: The strong recommendation of those on the teleconference was that there should be 7 members of the initial board. If there is any objection to this number, then the call's strong recommendation is that there should be a section on the ballot for each voter to pick from amongst the following options for the number of total seats: 5, 7, 9 Voting For the ALAC Candidates: Each voter may vote for two candidates amongst the field of three If Ms. Cretu's candidature is viewed as invalid by the Office of the ICANN GC then the two remaining candidates will be voted on. The terms of the two seats are staggered. Whichever candidate receives the larger share of the vote shall have the two-year term. The candidate receiving the next-highest number of votes shall receive the one year term. The two candidates receiving the the most votes will be elected. The remaining candidate, (if any) will be subject to election to the Board (see below for details) Voting For the EURALO Board: The ballot for the board will list all of the current nominees for board seats, of which there are twelve (12) (reproduced below and also at Meeting Notes 4 May 2007.) This list includes the three candidates for ALAC seats. If there is a candidate for an ALAC seat who does not get elected, that person may be seated as a board member (but see below). No candidate for ALAC may be elected to both an ALAC seat AND a board seat, however. The actual ballot will work as follows (subject to the capability of the voting system to be able to accomodate this procedure; if it is not, then we will let you know what can be done which is as close to the below as possible: Each voter will rank, in order of preference, ALL the board nominees. The voting system will then produce a list, which incorporates the preferences expressed. The board members who will be elected are the top 'N' listed, from the top of the list on down. The Number 'N' shall be either: In the case that no objection is raised to the call's recommendation of seven (7) members: 7 In the case that an objection is raised, then the number shall be that number from the selection above (5,7,9) which receives the most votes. TERM OF BOARD MEMBERS: It was not decided on the call how to determine which board members would receive one year terms, and which would receive two, as per the Bylaws, Clause 9.5.2. Therefore, the staff recommends the following: The top 1/2 of the list of preferences from the board election (rounded to the nearest whole number, depending upon the number of seats), will receive two-year terms, and the bottom 1/2 will receive one-year terms. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO OBJECT TO THIS PROCEDURE as this is simply a staff proposal. Keep in mind, however, that it might be viewed as less than ideal to have another ballot, immediately after the first, to decide who shall have what length of term from amongst those elected. VOTING MECHANISM: At-Large uses a voting system provided by BigPulse (www.bigpulse.com) The authorised voter will receive an individualised email, with a clickable link as well as manual login instructions, which are individually-generated. The system will be setup to provide a secret ballot, and the ICANN staff will ensure that the system produces a reminder email 48 hours before the vote closes, and then again 24 hours before the vote closes, to any voter who has not yet voted to help ensure that they do cast a vote. We will also setup a URL where anyone will be able to see the results of the vote for themselves to ensure transparency with respect to the results. This URL will be forwarded to both European email lists. CANDIDATES LIST For the two ALAC seats Patrick Vande Walle Sebastien Bachollet Veronica Cretu For the EURALO Board Rudi Vansnick Vittorio Bertola Christoph Bruch Desiree Miloshevic Bill Drake Jeanette Hofmann Karen Banks Wolf Ludwig Paco de Qinto Patrick Vande Walle Sebastien Bachollet Veronica Cretu * Also available at: https://st.icann.org/euralo/index.cgi? euralo_elections_2007

2 1

Outcomes of the Teleconference: ALSes Eligible to Vote
by Nick Ashton-Hart May 5, 2007

May 5, 2007

Dear All: Amongst the strong recommendations produced on the call was relevant to the qualified voters in the upcoming elections. Whilst no impediment to participating in the work of the organisation is otherwise envisaged, it was strongly felt that only ALSes who are a party to the MoU with ICANN should cast votes in the upcoming election. The ICANN staff were asked to produce a list of the ALSes who have signed, either in person in Lisbon or electronically afterwards, and also a list of those accredited ALSes who have not signed. Any ALS who has not yet signed may still do so, electronically, by sending an email with the following form of words to me, and copied to the ALS list: --- I hereby consent for [INSERT ORGANISATION FULL NAME] to be bound by the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding between ICANN and the Signing Organisations in the European Region as if I were personally signing the document alongside the other Signing Organisations who are a party to the MoU. Name Organisational Title Date ---- Please - send this as a separate email, NOT as a reply to this message. ALSES who have signed: Suomen Internet-yhdistys ry. (ISOC Finland) Internet Society - Bulgaria Medienstadt Leipzig e.V. Internet Society Belgium Internet Society Luxembourg Chapitre français de l’Internet Society – ISOC France Società Internet ISOC CAT (CATALAN CHAPTER) HUMANISTISCHE UNION e.V. (GERMAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION) NETZWERK NEUE MEDIEN KOMITEE FUR EINE DEMOKRATISCHE UNO (COMMITTEE FOR A DEMOCRATIC UNITED NATIONS) ALSES who have NOT YET signed: Terre des Femmes E.v. FIfF IIAV DVD FoeBud e.V. ISOC NL ISOC Bulgaria FITUG -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director, At-Large ICANN PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom Main Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011] USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0