- EURO-Discuss - lists.icann.org

Reminder: Whois Registrant ID Study Webinar Invitation
by At-Large Staff March 5, 2013

March 5, 2013

http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-04mar13-en.htm <http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-04mar13-en.htm> Whois Registrant ID Study Webinar Invitation You are invited to a review of the findings of the Registrant ID Study Draft Report, recently published for public comment. The authors of the report (NORC) and ICANN Policy Staff will provide a briefing on Wednesday 6 March at 12.00 UTC and Wednesday 6 March at 19.00 UTC to summarize the findings from the WHOIS Registrant ID Study. The webinar will cover the methodology used to compile the data and provide an analysis of the findings. The two sessions will be identical, scheduled to accommodate different time zones. Each session, scheduled to run 90 minutes, will be conducted in English only. The meeting will be run in Adobe Connect with a slide presentation along with a dial-in conference bridge for audio. During the course of the webinar, questions may be submitted using the chat function of Adobe Connect. Participants also will have the opportunity to ask questions at the end of each session. If you are not able to participate in either of the live sessions, a recording of the session will be made available shortly after the meeting. The policy staff always is available to answer questions that you email to policy-staff(a)icann.org <mailto:policy-staff@icann.org> . In order to participate, please RSVP via email to the GNSO Secretariat (gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org <mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> ) to receive the call details. Please indicate which call you would like to join, Wednesday at 12.00 UTC or Wednesday at 19.00 UTC (to convert those times into your local time, see: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedform.html <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedform.html> ). We will send you an email reminder before the event with log-in and dial-in details. Please DO NOT RSVP to any other ICANN staff members e-mail address. --------------------- Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org One World, One Internet

1 0

R: [GTLD-WG] IMPORTANT: At-Large Objection Statements posted for RALO review - deadline for RALO advice to ALAC is March 5 2013
by Roberto Gaetano March 1, 2013

March 1, 2013

I am in general agreement with Christopher about closed generics. In particular, considering the deadline for RALO advice on the objection about the 5 different .heath applications and Chinese translation thereof, I support the objection statements. Cheers, Roberto > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: gtld-wg-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:gtld-wg- > bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di CW Mail > Inviato: martedì 26 febbraio 2013 21:56 > A: ICANN At-Large Staff > Cc: lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; New gTLD Review Group > (newgtldrg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org) EURALO LIST; afri-discuss@atlarge- > lists.icann.org; gtld-wg(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org WG list; apac-discuss@atlarge- > lists.icann.org; WALLONIE EXCOM; na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > Oggetto: Re: [GTLD-WG] IMPORTANT: At-Large Objection Statements > posted for RALO review - deadline for RALO advice to ALAC is March 5 2013 > Priorità: Alta > > Good evening: > > Noted. But Dear Anand Teelucksingh, I have serious reservations about the > method that you propose: > > 1. The discussion in At Large is about whether or not to oppose IN > PRINCIPLE the delegation of closed generic TLDs IN GENERAL. > I am opposed to the creation of closed/generic TLDs. The arguments > to this effect have already been set out on the ALAC e-mail list and > webpages. > > 2. In this context it is quite exaggerated to ask At Large members to > comment on individual closed/generic TLDs on a case-by-case basis. > This approach would, over time, result in requests for comments > about potentially hundreds if not thousands of TLD proposals. That could > quickly become unmanageable. > As an At Large participant I expect to participate in the development > of the general policy. Absent a decision on the general policy, it appears > absurd to start commenting on individual applications. > > 3. In the case in point, .HEALTH (why only that one?), is clearly a generic > TLD (in English) . With reference to point 1, above, I would oppose delegation > of ALL 5 proposals on the basis of closed/generic TLDs. > > I hope that this is helpful > > Christopher Wilkinson > > > On 26 Feb 2013, at 20:06, ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> > wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > Please see an important message being sent on behalf of Dev Anand > Teelucksingh, Chair of the At-Large new gTLD Review Group: > > > > ** > > Dear All, > > > > As per the process by which the ALAC can object to a new gTLD application, > (see one page PDF at http://bit.ly/how-ALAC-files-objection-to-new-gTLD ), > the new gTLD Review Group (gTLD RG) have posted objection statements on > community grounds to 5 new gTLD applications for Regional At-Large > Organisation (RALO) review and advice to the ALAC. > > > > The gTLD RG drafted the statements based on the outcomes of its review > > and discussion of comments received by February 8, 2013 (see > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/2013q1/009493.html) > > > > All of the objection statements are on community objection grounds. > > The community objection grounds page at > https://community.icann.org/x/QgkQAg lists four tests that would enable > the Dispute Resolution Service Provider hearing the objection to determine > whether there is substantial opposition from a significant portion of the > community to which the string may be targeted. Note also that ALL four tests > must be met for the objection to prevail. > > > > The 5 applications and objection statements, including the comments > received by the gTLD RG on the applications can be found on the workspace > at https://community.icann.org/x/soxwAg with 5 separate wiki pages for > each new gTLD application, the objection statement and the comments > received by the gTLD RG. Members of At-Large are invited to discuss and > post questions or comments on these wiki pages. > > > > All RALOs must review EACH of the 5 gTLD applications and the associated > information (objection statement, comments) on the wiki pages and decide > if the objection statement drafted by the gTLD RG group supports the > criterion for community objection. > > > > The RALO cannot modify any of the 5 objection statements, but must > advise the ALAC as to whether the RALO EITHER: > > 1) supports the objection statement being filed by the ALAC against > > the new gTLD application OR > > 2) NOT support the objection statement being filed by the ALAC against the > new gTLD application. > > > > This advice for each of the 5 objection statements must be sent to the > ALAC by March 5, 2013, 23:59 UTC so that the ALAC can review the RALO > advice before the end of the objection period on March 13, 2013. > > > > A conference call is tentatively scheduled on Thursday, February 28, > > 2013 (exact time will be confirmed by At-Large Staff) is being planned for > RALO officers with the gTLD RG members to provide an overview of the > process and to answer any questions they may have as to what is expected > by the RALOs as per the process by which the ALAC can object to a new gTLD > application. At-Large members are welcome to attend this call. > > > > Kind regards, > > Dev Anand Teelucksingh > > > > ** > > > > Regards, > > > > Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie > > Peregrine, and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of the > > ALAC > > E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > GTLD-WG mailing list > > GTLD-WG(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg > > > > Working Group direct URL: > > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs > > > > > _______________________________________________ > GTLD-WG mailing list > GTLD-WG(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg > > Working Group direct URL: > https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs

1 0

REMINDER: Call for Membership of New ICANN Meeting Strategy Working Group - DEADLINE: 3 March
by ICANN At-Large Staff Feb. 27, 2013

Feb. 27, 2013

Dear All, As announced<http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-11feb13-en.htm> on 11 February, ICANN has committed to identifying ICANN Meeting locations two years in advance. After consideration that adoption of a prior Consolidated Meetings Strategy proposal was not timely, the Public Participation Committee (PPC) initiated work to create a working group to address the meeting location strategy which was presented to the ICANN Board for approval in February 2013. In line with the Board resolution<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-02feb13-en.htm#2…> adopted on February the 2nd 2013, ICANN is creating a new Meeting Strategy Working Group<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/participation/mswg> (MSWG) and now invites interested individuals to apply for Volunteer Member positions - in representation of a Supporting Organization or Advisory Committee - to serve on the Meeting Strategy Working Group. The mandate and Mission of Meeting Strategy Working Group as defined in the MSWG Charter is as follows: to discuss and propose strategy for the structure, purpose and locations for ICANN Public Meetings and conferences, starting in 2015. Deadline Candidatures will be accepted until Sunday, 3 March 2013 - 23:59 UTC. How to Apply How to Apply for the Position of Volunteer Member for the MSWG Interested individuals are invited to provide the following: * A resume (maximum three pages); * A letter of motivation; * A Declaration of Interests (the template may be found at: http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/participation/mswg/coi-declaration-aff… [PDF, 34 KB]) * The Supporting Organization or Advisory Committee he/she wishes to represent; * Any additional information the Support Organization or Advisory Committee may require to reach its decision on endorsement. Candidatures will be forwarded to the Supporting Organization (SO) or Advisory Committee (AC) identified by the applicant, for endorsement. SO/AC endorsement will be factored into the selection process; Candidatures should be emailed to mswgcandidatures(a)icann.org<mailto:mswgcandidatures@icann.org> (please cc to staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>) The list of all candidates will be published on the ICANN website. More information * Call for Applicants<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/participation/mswg/call-for-volunteers…> * Charter<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/participation/mswg/charter> Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine, and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of the ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

4 3

CALL FOR COMMENTS: At-Large Expired Registration Recovery Education Needs Workspace
by ICANN At-Large Staff Feb. 27, 2013

Feb. 27, 2013

Dear All, Please note that the At-Large Expired Registration Recovery Education Needs Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/34twAg> has been created. Please note that this workspace will be used to collected the At-Large's Expired Registration Recovery Education Needs. Please submit any comments on the workspace using the comments function by 15-March-2013 at 23:59 UTC. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

IMPORTANT: At-Large Objection Statements posted for RALO review - deadline for RALO advice to ALAC is March 5 2013
by ICANN At-Large Staff Feb. 26, 2013

Feb. 26, 2013

Dear All, Please see an important message being sent on behalf of Dev Anand Teelucksingh, Chair of the At-Large new gTLD Review Group: ** Dear All, As per the process by which the ALAC can object to a new gTLD application, (see one page PDF at http://bit.ly/how-ALAC-files-objection-to-new-gTLD ), the new gTLD Review Group (gTLD RG) have posted objection statements on community grounds to 5 new gTLD applications for Regional At-Large Organisation (RALO) review and advice to the ALAC. The gTLD RG drafted the statements based on the outcomes of its review and discussion of comments received by February 8, 2013 (see http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/2013q1/009493.html) All of the objection statements are on community objection grounds. The community objection grounds page at https://community.icann.org/x/QgkQAg lists four tests that would enable the Dispute Resolution Service Provider hearing the objection to determine whether there is substantial opposition from a significant portion of the community to which the string may be targeted. Note also that ALL four tests must be met for the objection to prevail. The 5 applications and objection statements, including the comments received by the gTLD RG on the applications can be found on the workspace at https://community.icann.org/x/soxwAg with 5 separate wiki pages for each new gTLD application, the objection statement and the comments received by the gTLD RG. Members of At-Large are invited to discuss and post questions or comments on these wiki pages. All RALOs must review EACH of the 5 gTLD applications and the associated information (objection statement, comments) on the wiki pages and decide if the objection statement drafted by the gTLD RG group supports the criterion for community objection. The RALO cannot modify any of the 5 objection statements, but must advise the ALAC as to whether the RALO EITHER: 1) supports the objection statement being filed by the ALAC against the new gTLD application OR 2) NOT support the objection statement being filed by the ALAC against the new gTLD application. This advice for each of the 5 objection statements must be sent to the ALAC by March 5, 2013, 23:59 UTC so that the ALAC can review the RALO advice before the end of the objection period on March 13, 2013. A conference call is tentatively scheduled on Thursday, February 28, 2013 (exact time will be confirmed by At-Large Staff) is being planned for RALO officers with the gTLD RG members to provide an overview of the process and to answer any questions they may have as to what is expected by the RALOs as per the process by which the ALAC can object to a new gTLD application. At-Large members are welcome to attend this call. Kind regards, Dev Anand Teelucksingh ** Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine, and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of the ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 0

Pre-Beijing ICANN Policy Update Webinar Invitation
by At-Large Staff Feb. 25, 2013

Feb. 25, 2013

http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-21feb13-en.htm Pre-Beijing ICANN Policy Update Webinar Invitation In order to participate, please RSVP via email to the GNSO Secretariat (gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org) to receive the call details. Whether you plan to participate in the upcoming ICANN meeting in Beijing remotely or in person, you're invited to an update on the background and current status of major policy issues which are likely to be discussed during the Beijing Meeting. The ICANN Policy Staff will provide a briefing on Thursday 21 March at 12.00 UTC and Thursday 21 March at 19.00 UTC, summarizing policy issues across the different ICANN Supporting Organizations, namely the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO), Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) and Address Supporting Organization (ASO). Amongst other topics, updates will be provided on: * WHOIS related activities * The locking of a domain name subject to UDRP Proceedings * Protection of IGO and INGO Names * IDN ccNSO PDP * Study Group on Use of Names for Countries and Territories * SSAC report on Domain Name Registration Data Validation Taxonomy The webinar will cover other topics which will be raised during or otherwise relevant to the Beijing Meeting. In addition, staff will provide a briefing on the ALAC's activities related to current policy development issues of the Supporting Organizations. The two sessions are duplicates, scheduled to accommodate different time zones. Each session, scheduled to run for 90 minutes, will be conducted in English only. The meeting will be run in Adobe Connect with a slide presentation along with a dial-in conference bridge for audio. Participants will have the opportunity to ask questions at the end of each session. During the course of the webinar, questions may be submitted using the chat function of Adobe Connect. If you are not able to participate in either of the live sessions, the recording of the session will be made available shortly after the meeting. The policy staff is always available to answer any questions that you email to policy-staff(a)icann.org. In order to participate, please RSVP via email to the GNSO Secretariat (gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org) to receive the call details. Please indicate which call you would like to join, Thursday at 12.00 UTC or Thursday at 19.00 UTC (to convert those times into your local time, see: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedform.html) We will send you an e-mail reminder before the event with log-in and dial-in details. Please DO NOT RSVP to any other ICANN staff members e-mail address. -- Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org One World, One Internet

1 0

Follow-up from today’s call – At-Large suffrage ...
by Wolf Ludwig Feb. 21, 2013

Feb. 21, 2013

Dear all, as some of you might remember, we conducted repeated consultations for the s/election of the At-Large Board director (Seat No. 15 – currently Sébastien) in autumn 2010. I still believe that this generic consultation process at EURALO at the time was sort of a best practice to allow the RALO Chair (as part of the electorate) a guided or directed vote based on the (majority) will of his community. Recently, a discussion on such procedures and principles has started on the ALAC list and Avri Doria, member of EURALO, gave a short briefing on the issue at our monthly call last night. For those who have not been on the call (or want a detailed briefing on it), here is the link to the position paper from Avri „At-Large suffrage request to RALOs“ what will be raised and discussed again at our next monthly calls – see: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/40175601/Avri.pdf?version=… Your questions or comments on the issue are welcome! IMO, EURALO should not go behind its procedure and practice from last time, and we should reflect how broad-based community participation on such an important issue could be improved or guaranteed? Thanks for your consideration and comments, kind regards, Wolf P. S. this was one of the Action Items of our today’s call EuroDIG Secretariat http://www.eurodig.org/ mobile +41 79 204 83 87 Skype: Wolf-Ludwig EURALO - ICANN's Regional At-Large Organisation http://euralo.org Profile on LinkedIn http://ch.linkedin.com/in/wolfludwig

1 0

Meeting Invitation / At-Large WHOIS Briefing Call
by At-Large Staff Feb. 19, 2013

Feb. 19, 2013

Dear All, On behalf of Olivier Crepin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, and Carlton Samuels, Chair of the At-Large WHOIS Working Group, you are invited to participate in an At-Large briefing call on the subject of WHOIS scheduled for Wednesday 20 February 2013 between 15:00 - 16:30 UTC. For other times: http://tinyurl.com/c9oc9n2 The agenda and call details are available at: https://community.icann.org/x/koZwAg Adobe Connect Meeting Room: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/atlargewhois/ <http://icann.adobeconnect.com/atlargewhois/> During this WHOIS briefing call, Carlton will first provide an introduction to WHOIS and frame the issue in the context of At-Large. Jim Galvin, SSAC Vice-Chair, will comment on WHOIS as it concerns security and integrity of the Internet. Thereafter, members of the At-Large community and the broader ICANN community will present their various views of WHOIS. Confirmed speakers include: Garth Bruen, Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Avri Doria, Alan Greenberg, Evan Leibovitch, Michele Neylon and Holly Raiche. There will be a Question and Answer session following the speakers. Spanish and French interpretation will be provided for this briefing call. We look forward to your participation. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org One World, One Internet

1 2

outcomes from the gTLD Review Group re: drafting of possible objections to new gTLD applications
by Dev Anand Teelucksingh Feb. 19, 2013

Feb. 19, 2013

Members of the new gTLD Review Group (gTLD RG) considered the comments from the At-Large community as of February 8 2013 regarding the applications for .amazon (https://community.icann.org/x/dAFlAg) .patagonia (https://community.icann.org/x/fgFlAg) .health (https://community.icann.org/x/0wZlAg) .nyc (https://community.icann.org/x/CYJEAg) None of the applications raised any limited public interest concerns (https://community.icann.org/x/QAkQAg) gTLD RG members ranked each factor of the four tests for community objection grounds ((https://community.icann.org/x/QgkQAg) based on the comments and discussions. Based on these rankings, the following are the decisions by the gTLD RG: Re: .amazon (https://community.icann.org/x/dAFlAg) There will be no drafting of an objection statement on community grounds for the application for .amazon given that the "detriment" test for community objection grounds was not passed. Re: .patagonia (https://community.icann.org/x/fgFlAg) There will be no drafting of an objection statement on community grounds for the application for .patagonia given that the "targeting" and "detriment" tests for community objection grounds were not passed. Re: .health (https://community.icann.org/x/0wZlAg) Objection statements on community grounds will be drafted for the applications for .health given that the four tests for community objection grounds were passed. The gTLD RG will attempt to put together the objection statements to the applications for .health in time for RALO review around 22 February 2013. Re: .nyc There will be no drafting of an objection statement on community grounds for the application for .nyc given the comments received as on February 8 2013 indicated that the initial objection concerns raised were being addressed. A late comment sent to the gTLD RG on 11 February 2013 was treated by the gTLD RG as being submitted too late for consideration. Kind Regards, Dev Anand Teelucksingh gTLD RG chair

3 2

Re: [EURO-Discuss] [At-Large] outcomes from the gTLD Review Group re: drafting of possible objections to new gTLD applications
by Alan Greenberg Feb. 16, 2013

Feb. 16, 2013

Dev, without commenting on the substance of these recommendations, I really want to commend you on the effort and care you have put into this process. Alan At 16/02/2013 04:30 PM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh wrote: >Members of the new gTLD Review Group (gTLD RG) considered the comments >from the At-Large community as of February 8 2013 regarding the >applications for > >.amazon (https://community.icann.org/x/dAFlAg) >.patagonia (https://community.icann.org/x/fgFlAg) >.health (https://community.icann.org/x/0wZlAg) >.nyc (https://community.icann.org/x/CYJEAg) > >None of the applications raised any limited public interest concerns >(https://community.icann.org/x/QAkQAg) > >gTLD RG members ranked each factor of the four tests for community >objection grounds ((https://community.icann.org/x/QgkQAg) >based on the comments and discussions. Based on these rankings, the >following are the decisions by the gTLD RG: > >Re: .amazon (https://community.icann.org/x/dAFlAg) >There will be no drafting of an objection statement on community >grounds for the application for .amazon >given that the "detriment" test for community objection grounds was >not passed. > >Re: .patagonia (https://community.icann.org/x/fgFlAg) >There will be no drafting of an objection statement on community >grounds for the application for .patagonia given that >the "targeting" and "detriment" tests for community objection grounds >were not passed. > >Re: .health (https://community.icann.org/x/0wZlAg) >Objection statements on community grounds will be drafted for the >applications for .health given that the four tests for community >objection >grounds were passed. The gTLD RG will attempt to put together the >objection statements to the applications for .health in time >for RALO review around 22 February 2013. > >Re: .nyc >There will be no drafting of an objection statement on community >grounds for the application for .nyc given the comments received as on >February 8 2013 indicated that the initial objection concerns raised >were being addressed. >A late comment sent to the gTLD RG on 11 February 2013 was treated by >the gTLD RG as being submitted too late for consideration. > > >Kind Regards, > >Dev Anand Teelucksingh >gTLD RG chair >_______________________________________________ >At-Large mailing list >At-Large(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large > >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org

1 0