July 2013 - EURO-Discuss - lists.icann.org

Re: [EURO-Discuss] [ALAC-Announce] ICANN News Alert -- ICANN Strategy Panels Launched
by Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond July 26, 2013

July 26, 2013

Dear all, just a reminder of the announcement below -- with the deadline for sending your resume/CV to the email addresses affiliated with each of the specialty areas by 29 July 2013. This gives you the week-end to send your resume out. Kind regards, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond ALAC Chair On 15/07/2013 16:41, ICANN At-Large Staff wrote: > > [http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> > News Alert > > http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-15jul13-en.htm > > ________________________________ > ICANN Strategy Panels Launched > > Strategy Panels Unveiled at ICANN 47 in Durban > > 15 July 2013 > > During today's opening ceremony of ICANN 47 in Durban, South Africa, President and CEO Fadi Chehadé announced the creation of five new ICANN Strategy Panels that will serve as an integral part of a framework for cross-community dialogue on strategic matters. The ICANN Strategy Panels will convene subject matter experts, thought leaders and industry practitioners to support development of ICANN's strategic and operational plans, in coordination with many other global players, and will be comprised of up to seven members including the chair for an anticipated one-year timeframe. > > Designed to conduct work in critical strategic areas identified by the community, Board and staff, the ICANN Strategy Panels will build on public input being generated to inform a new, overarching vision and five-year strategic plan, and subsequent operating plan, for the organization. Advisory in nature, the ICANN Strategy Panels will report to Chehadé; will operate in a manner consistent with ICANN's commitment to transparency and accountability; and will channel all views, guidance and advice produced into the standard community and Board processes that guide ICANN's activities. > > In its fourteen-year history, ICANN has grown to reflect a changing landscape of continued innovation, interconnectedness, and unprecedented growth in the DNS ecosystem, one that transcends groups and borders to serve the public interest. Yet, the Internet is at a critical inflection point as billions of new people are expected to join the global network in the next few years and as the nature of its usage matures dramatically. With this in mind, the ICANN Strategy Panels are expected to help catalyze transformation and advance ICANN's role in the context of a dynamic, increasingly complex global environment. > > Schedules and Operations > > The ICANN Strategy Panels will conduct their activities, starting in September 2013, primarily online and through conference calls, although face-to-face meetings are expected to take place according to the needs of each panel. The ICANN Strategy Panels will also provide public updates on their progress that will be linked to ICANN's overall strategic and operational planning activities. Dedicated ICANN executive liaisons have been assigned to and will support each of the ICANN Strategy Panels throughout the process. > > Members and Objectives > > The ICANN Strategy Panels will focus specifically on identifier technology innovation; ICANN's role in the Internet organizations' ecosystem; ICANN multistakeholder innovation; the public responsibility framework; and the role of ICANN in the future of Internet governance. Chairs who will lead the panels in their respective concentrations and who will guide the panels in their groundbreaking efforts have been identified; however, qualified individuals interested in serving as committee members are still being sought. Potential panel members need not originate directly from ICANN structures, but should have a deep understanding of and concern for the work being undertaken by ICANN, and an ability to think strategically, globally, and creatively about the challenges inherent in the ICANN Strategy Panels' mandate. Interested individuals should send their resume/CV to the email addresses affiliated with each of the specialty areas by 29 July 2013. Members will be selected by ICANN's President & CEO, in coordination with each ICANN Strategy Panel Chair. > > ________________________________ > Strategy Panel on Identifier Technology Innovation > > Chair: Paul V. Mockapetris<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/bios#paul-mocka…> > > [http://www.icann.org/sites/default/files/styles/bio_photo/public/mockapetri…]<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/bios#paul-mocka…> > > Contact: itipanel(a)icann.org<mailto:itipanel@icann.org> > > Key Deliverables: > > * Engage with the ICANN community and public on technology matters; > * Develop a technology roadmap for DNS and other identifiers; and > * Provide a technology roadmap for ICANN technical and security operations, including best practice recommendations and reference systems. > > ________________________________ > Strategy Panel on ICANN's Role in the Internet Organizations' Ecosystem > > Chair: Vinton G. Cerf<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/bios#vinton-cerf> > > [http://www.icann.org/sites/default/files/styles/bio_photo/public/cerf-150x2…]<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/bios#vinton-cerf> > > Contact: ioepanel(a)icann.org <mailto:ioepanel@icann.org> > > Key Deliverables: > > * Facilitate review of the assumptions, linkages and frameworks that underlie ICANN's responsibilities in the current Internet ecosystem; > * Seek insights on ways to maintain and enhance ICANN's stewardship in an evolving ecosystem; and > * Cultivate thought leadership on ways in which ICANN can serve a complex set of Internet constituencies. > > ________________________________ > Strategy Panel on ICANN Multistakeholder Innovation > > Chair: Beth Simone Noveck<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/bios#beth-simon…> > > [http://www.icann.org/sites/default/files/styles/bio_photo/public/noveck-150…]<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/bios#beth-simon…> > > Contact: msipanel(a)icann.org<mailto:msipanel@icann.org> > > Key Deliverables: > > * Examine how Internet policy related to unique identifiers might be best managed in the future; > * Propose new models for broad, inclusive engagement, consensus-based policymaking and institutional structures to support such enhanced functions; and > * Design processes, tools and platforms that enable the global ICANN community to engage in these new forms of participatory decision-making. > > ________________________________ > Strategy Panel on the Public Responsibility Framework > > Chair: Nii Quaynor<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/bios#nii-quaynor> > > [http://www.icann.org/sites/default/files/styles/bio_photo/public/quaynor-15…]<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement/bios#nii-quaynor> > > Contact: prfpanel(a)icann.org<mailto:prfpanel@icann.org> > > Key Deliverables: > > * Propose ICANN's role and five-year strategic objectives and milestones for promoting the global public interest vis-à-vis ICANN's mission and core values and for building out the base of internationally diverse, knowledgeable and engaged ICANN stakeholders, especially within the developing world; > * Propose a framework for implementation of ICANN's role, objectives and milestones for promoting the global public interest, building capacity within the ICANN community, and increasing the base of internationally diverse, knowledgeable and engaged ICANN stakeholders; and > * Provide advice on programs and initiatives that help achieve the above objectives. > > ________________________________ > Strategy Panel on the Role of ICANN in the Future of Internet Governance > > Chair: TBD > > [http://www.icann.org/sites/default/files/styles/bio_photo/public/placeholde…] > > Contact: figpanel(a)icann.org<mailto:figpanel@icann.org> > > Key Deliverables: > > * Provide a set of guiding principles to ensure the successful evolution of ICANN's transnational multistakeholder model in cooperation with national and international bodies; > * Propose a roadmap for evolving and globalizing ICANN's role in the Internet governance ecosystem in consultation with global players; and > * In coordination with the many other global players and ICANN stakeholders, propose a framework for implementation of ICANN's role, objectives and milestones in global Internet governance. > > ________________________________ > > > As the ICANN Strategy Panels get underway, additional information will be available via ICANN's strategic planning portal<http://www.icann.org/en/about/planning/strategic-engagement>. > > > > This message was sent to matt.ashtiani(a)icann.org<mailto:matt.ashtiani@icann.org> from: > > ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 > > > Email Marketing by [http://app.icontact.com/images/icontact_tryFree.gif] <http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186> > > > Manage Your Subscription <http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=24564788&l=6333&s=BCA3&m=91…> > > _______________________________________________ > ALAC-Announce mailing list > ALAC-Announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce > > At-Large Official Site: http://www.atlarge.icann.org > -- Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD http://www.gih.com/ocl.html

1 0

Regional advice on Euro Individuals Association
by Wolf Ludwig July 23, 2013

July 23, 2013

Dear all, as you may recall, EURALO amended its Bylaws in spring 2011 to allow better involvement and participation of individual members in our region. To provide a voting right in a balanced manner to existing ALSes, we asked them to create their own home ALS to accommodate individuals from all over the region. After an arduous path At-Large Staff finally received an application from the Euro-Individuals to become a regular At-Large structure and the application was undergoing the usual DD procedure. The contact points of this ALS are Roberto Gaetano with residence in Austria / Vienna and Veronica Cretu from Moldavia. Attached please find the DD form – please note that the DD form could contain sensitive information. Please read the form carefully before sending it off to third parties. As EURALO was asked for its regional advice on the applicant, I would like to ask you for your comments and consideration. If no objections are raised on this list until Saturday, 27 July midnight (CEST), the regional advice to ALAC will be positive and to certify this new member ALS. Thanks for your support and kind regards, Wolf EuroDIG Secretariat http://www.eurodig.org/ mobile +41 79 204 83 87 Skype: Wolf-Ludwig EURALO - ICANN's Regional At-Large Organisation http://euralo.org Profile on LinkedIn http://ch.linkedin.com/in/wolfludwig

4 4

REMINDER: MEETING REPORTS
by ICANN At-Large Staff July 17, 2013

July 17, 2013

Dear All, As a reminder, please be sure to submit your meeting reports on the At-Large Durban Meeting Reports Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/bAV-Ag>. Regards, Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support of ALAC E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org>

1 3

Re: [EURO-Discuss] [NA-Discuss] REMINDER: MEETING REPORTS
by Heidi Ullrich July 16, 2013

July 16, 2013

Hi Dharma, The target of the reports is primarily the At-Large community. However, the link to the Durban Reports Workspace (see: https://community.icann.org/x/bAV-Ag ) is placed in the Chair's Report which other members of the Community and the ICANN Board may read. Kind regards, Heidi -----Original Message----- From: Dharma Dailey [mailto:dharma.dailey@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 2:41 AM To: Dharma Dailey Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff; alac-announce(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; apac-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-en(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; lac-discuss-es(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org; na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] REMINDER: MEETING REPORTS Also, what is the purpose of the reporting? Who is the audience. Best, Dharma On Jul 16, 2013, at 11:40 AM, Dharma Dailey <dharma.dailey(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Heidi, > > Is there any guidance on what is supposed to go into the report, length, and when it is due? > > Thanks, > Dharma Dailey > > > On Jul 16, 2013, at 11:25 AM, ICANN At-Large Staff <staff(a)atlarge.icann.org> wrote: > >> Dear All, >> >> As a reminder, please be sure to submit your meeting reports on the At-Large Durban Meeting Reports Workspace<https://community.icann.org/x/bAV-Ag>. >> >> Regards, >> >> Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Matt Ashtiani, Gisella Gruber, >> Nathalie Peregrine and Julia Charvolen ICANN Policy Staff in support >> of ALAC >> E-mail: staff(a)atlarge.icann.org<mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org> >> ------ >> NA-Discuss mailing list >> NA-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss >> >> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org >> ------ >

1 0

Trip to Caucasus - conclusions and recommendations
by Roberto Gaetano July 15, 2013

July 15, 2013

I would like to conclude this sequence of messages with some final consideration and proposals for action. As usual, separate messages for different lists. Regional issue There is wide unhappiness in the South Caucasus (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia) about being considered in the Asia-Pacific-Australasia region, they would rather be included in the European region. I have included some of the rationale in my previous messages, but just to summarize, it is about preferential partnership with Europe for Internet projects, long term plans to join the European Union, being already considered part of Europe in other cases related to music and sport, the proximity to Europe more than to the Pacific rim, and, last but not least, that for IP addresses and ccTLDs often these countries are members of the European regional organizations (RIPE and CENTR). There is an ongoing activity to rethink the ICANN regions. These considerations should be brought forward in that context (actually, I believe that this is the case already, but I would like to bring this item to the attention of the whole ALAC community). IDNs I have noted only mild interest about IDNs in my discussions with the local community. This was a surprise to me, in particular considering that two countries have a different script and the third one has several special characters added to the latin script. Is this a matter of fact, i.e. IDNs will not bring much to the local internet community, neither in terms of business opportunities nor in terms of ease of use by the community, or does this show a lack of promotion and advertisement of the IDNs by ICANN and its stakeholders? I think that this is a serious question: are we spending a lot of resources for something that is only of mild interest, or are we jeopardizing huge efforts by not advertising enough to our community? Also, I have an additional question. This is the feedback I have from the South Caucasus region, but what is the situation in other parts of the world? Does anybody have other types of info? I guess that the deployment of the first IDNs will give a partial answer to this question, but do we really need to wait more to take appropriate marketing steps for what is one of the major innovations in the DNS, and one of ICANN's success stories? Outreach - 1 In my report from Armenia I spoke about the "blank spot" on the ICANN penetration map. Without any doubt, we have much to do in relation to At-Large outreach in the former Soviet Union. ALAC is present with ALSes in very few of these countries, and completely absent in all the "stans". This is related to the situation about human rights, government control, freedom of press, and so on. However, aren't we in a vicious circle? In other words, which is the cause and which is the effect? Had we some active users organizations, wouldn't these be able to influence the government? I think that people living in that reality can contribute more to this debate than somebody like me, who only was there visiting, but unless the local community in the CIS (Community of Independent States) tell me loud and clear that there's nothing we can do to change the situation, I will continue thinking that developing At-Large community and structures must be one of our priorities. If we believe in the multi-stakeholder model, we must be committed to develop this model where it is not fully implemented. I would recommend to have a meeting of the Outreach WG in Durban. I know it is late in the game, but I don't think we need a large room and a long time, if it is not possible to have an "official" meeting I would at least hope that the members of the WG can get together at the bar to have a chat. But of course a meeting with staff support, minutes, and a clear action list as a result would be better. Incidentally, I hope that Veni will be in Durban, because his contribution is essential. I learned that there is already sub-regional collaboration for technical issues related to the internet, and that the internet technical community of the former Soviet Union countries already meets regularly. Shall we seek to have a couple of (Russian-speaking) ALAC members participating, to explore collaboration opportunities? About 10 years ago I went to a CENTR meeting to promote links between the ccTLDs and the forming ALAC. Nothing came out of it, but in time we had some developments, including ccTLD operators joining At-Large. But if we never start, we will never get anywhere. Outreach - 2 Besides outreach to specific geographical areas, it seems that we need outreach plans for specific stakeholder groups. First of all, I had confirmation of something we all had observed over the years: the lack of interest by the scientific and research community in ICANN activities. Is this a matter of fact, i.e. there is no reason why the internet scientific and research community should participate in Internet Governance activities, or do we have here another case of lack of marketing of ICANN's role? The key question is what can ICANN, and ALAC, offer to this community so that we can establish collaboration? If we establish collaboration on specific projects, we will naturally see a higher interest in participation by them. Again, there is probably one simple way: to participate, as observers, to some of the activities that the internet scientific and research community is performing. We need a couple of ALAC members that are technically competent, to be respected by the other participants, that can understand and report what are the needs and priorities, and then we can analyse the implications for the user community and propose contributions. Also, we need to take into account the more general question: "What can ICANN do for the user community?". I am under the impression that, although ALAC has grown in size and importance, the core of our group is still composed by idealists who debate matters of principle. Matters of principle are surely important, but we need also to address some practical needs. For instance, what do we do in support of registrants, to make them better aware of their rights and to help them when they get in trouble with their suppliers? The development of the new TLD programme might make this aspect even more critical. Can we think of training activities, done by ALSes in collaboration with other bodies? I am sure that some ALSes do already this, for instance ISOC chapters are involved in user training, but how much are these experiences shared within ALAC, and used as example for building new activities? For instance, at the ISOC Armenia meeting I spoke with Narine Khachatryan (Media Education Center), who told me about a "train the trainer" programme, an experience that could be interesting to other ALSes. Should we include in the ATLAS II programme some time for sharing these experiences? There are discussions already going on in terms of budget, I do not want to interfere here with the official bodies that are making decisions now, but I strongly believe that ALAC, as a grown-up adult, should be entitled to manage a part of the budget for initiatives that can be decided when the opportunity comes, without having to go for a long and cumbersome approval cycle. If this is done, we should have a budget item earmarked for "Outreach" where we can decide activities that we will perform with the objective of improving our penetration in the wide At-Large community worldwide. Last but not least, when we talk about "Digital Divide" we often think in terms of developing countries vs. industrialized world. However, there are other divides within each country. The experience in the South Caucasus made me aware of the divide between cities and countryside, the problems of scarcely populated areas (I believe we already have an example of ALS operating in Canada in this type of environment), the divide between the digital natives and the others (Tijani might remember a discussion we had in Tunisia years ago about the effort in doing something to help elderly people). I think these are things we need to start thinking about if we want to go to the next step in ALAC's life, which is to be more relevant in the internet community's everyday life, and I am sure that this will bring new people, new organizations, new ideas, and will drive the multi-stakeholder model to a higher level of implementation. Cheers, Roberto

5 11

Trip to Caucasus - Chapter 3 - Georgia
by Roberto Gaetano July 10, 2013

July 10, 2013

Hi all. Following up my previous reports on Armenia and Azerbaijan, I would like to continue with Georgia. I will also have some final considerations on the region, and some recommendations, but that will be part of a future message. My main contact in the country was Ramaz Kvatadze, from the Georgian Research and Educational Networking Association (GRENA - http://grena.ge/eng/) I had a very good meeting with him, and other short occasional conversations with other folks. The main points that came out from the discussion with Ramaz were (to the best of my recollection, in random order, after validation by Ramaz): . There is an ISOC chapter, not member of the At-Large, some groups are participating in ISOC Community Grants programmes. . The infrastructure is in average good, but there are substantial differences between big cities and remote villages. . While the main problem in the countryside is connectivity, that must be improved, the main complaint in big cities is compliance of the operators with the promised quality of service. . The government has undertaken efforts for developing eGovernment, as of today there are many applications that allow citizen and organizations to obtain certificates and make declarations online. . The scientific and research community is not active on ICANN matters because there is no benefit associated to its participation. . The scientific and research community has strong collaboration with similar communities in other Caucasus countries as well as other geographical areas worldwide, but the main interest and efforts are devoted to cooperation with Europe. . Although Georgia feels strongly more European than Asian, the current location in AP as ICANN geographic region is not felt as an obstacle. However, the main goal of Georgia is to become real member of European community. . The adoption of new technologies (mobile telecommunication, internet) have been slowed down initially by the monopoly situation, but now the competition among operators favours rapid development and strong improvement of the infrastructure. . The main obstacle for further improvement of the ICT infrastructure is lack of financial resources, as private business is unable to invest in development in rural/mountain areas as these are scarcely populated and there will be not enough return on investment. . Georgia has good relationships with both Armenia and Azerbaijan, organizing regional meetings in Georgia is easier than in the neighboring countries. In fact almost all regional meetings are organized in Georgia. To this, I would like to add some personal considerations. I have travelled extensively, in cities and in rural areas, and have found fair to good internet connectivity. I have experienced a difference between cities and countryside, which confirms the feedback I had from Ramaz. However, the improvement of the connectivity seems no simple task, and other comments I have gathered from different sources, mainly individual internet users, is that the overall connectivity is not the first priority. From a different source, I have learned that Georgia is planning to lay down a second backbone cable that should connect east and west Georgia running close to the southern border (unfortunately, I was unable to get confirmation of this from other sources). It seems that addressing the risk of a cut in the intra-Georgian communication (between east and west Georgia) is a higher priority than addressing the connectivity in remote areas. The reason might appear obvious to people who know the recent history and the current threats of the region. I am under the impression that tourism, that is a flourishing business in Georgia, and rightfully so, can be an incentive to the improvement of the internet infrastructure. For instance, my last day was in Batumi, touristic area on the Black Sea, close to the border with Turkey. I have found a large number of bars, coffee shops, restaurants, that were offering free WiFi. On the other hand, I compare this with Mestia, in the Svaneti, another place with high touristic potential, but on the Caucasus mountains, where no B&B offered WiFi, and I was unable to find any establishment included it. My assumption was, although it was difficult to verify this with the local people, that the limited bandwidth in some areas was the limiting factor. But, as I said, it is just my personal speculation. I had another example of the situation in remote areas travelling to the Tusheti area (in the Caucasus mountains, north-east Georgia). The electric and telephone lines, installed in Soviet times, were abandoned because the cost of maintenance was too high, leaving the whole area without power and connectivity. It has to be said that the road itself to Omalo, the largest village in Tusheti, is passable only by 4x4 vehicles and the Abano pass itself is closed from October to May because of snow. However, the population got organized: almost every household has solar cells and is therefore autonomous for electrical power, and there are GSM (solar-powered) cells that ensure mobile phone connectivity to the valley. I was impressed by this, and thought that this could be an example for other parts of the world, where laying cables is too costly. Incidentally, at about the same time I heard the recent news about the experiments on internet connection via satellite in New Zealand, which shows that new ways are being explored. Talking about mobile phones, there seems to be excellent market penetration. While it is true that the monopoly situation has slowed down the progress, my observation, in cities and also in remote areas, is that the initial delay has been caught up. There is a wide offer, and if you get a local SIM card you can reload it also at ATM-like machines that are widely available for different types of payments. The last comment is about the geopolitical collocation of Georgia. I have to say that travelling through the country I had the impression to be in Europe. Just the signs in Georgian alphabet reminded me that I was in the Caucasus. As a matter of fact, this proximity to Europe made me forget to inquiry about another topic I wanted to get information on: the need, or not, for IDN. However, I have the feeling that, while this is probably an issue in large cities, the main problem in scarcely populated areas remains the connection. Best regards, Roberto Additional note for EURALO: we need to seriously think about the regional distribution of the countries. I have seen the latest recommendation (http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-22jun13-en.htm) maybe we should have a quick check in Durban about the subject.

4 7

Re: [EURO-Discuss] At-Large Multistakeholder Policy Roundtable in Durban @ ICANN 47
by ICANN At-Large Staff July 10, 2013

July 10, 2013

Dear Members of the At-Large Community, Please join us for the upcoming At-Large Multistakeholder Policy Roundtable in Durban (on site or via remote participation). Program information is indicated below and attached. Best regards, Rinalia AT-LARGE MULTISTAKEHOLDER POLICY ROUNDTABLE @ ICANN 47 [Durban, South Africa] Date: 15 July 2013 (Monday) Time: 14:00-16:00 Meeting Room: Hall 2AB http://durban47.icann.org/node/39645 New gTLDs: Addressing Consumer and Public Interest Concerns ICANN’s new generic Top Level Domain (gTLD) Program will dramatically expand the Top Level Domain Space. The program carries benefits for end users and registrants in terms of increasing choice and competition, but it also raises a range of consumer and public interest concerns. These concerns include consumer safety and trust, multilingual access to gTLDs via internationalized scripts, rights issues related to the protection of trademarks, non-registered marks and geographic names, as well as barriers to program participation for stakeholders in the developing world. The At-Large Multistakeholder Policy Roundtable will highlight these issues and explore the adequacy of policies and mechanisms meant to address them. Discussion Questions: 1. What are the consumer and public interest concerns in relation to the new gTLD program? 2. Are the policies and mechanisms that have been developed to address these concerns adequate? 3. What more needs to be done to address these concerns effectively? Co-Chair: · Olivier Crepin-Leblond (Chair, At-Large Advisory Committee) · Rinalia Abdul Rahim (Executive Committee Member, At-Large Advisory Committee & Convenor, At-Large Multistakeholder Policy Roundtable) Lead Discussants Consumer Perspective – Holly Raiche (Chair, At-Large Registrant Rights and Responsibilities Working Group & Board Member, Australian Communications Consumers Action Network) Public Interest and Government Perspective – Peter Nettlefold (Vice Chair, ICANN Governmental Advisory Committee & GAC Lead on New gTLDs) Business Users Perspective – Zahid Jamil (Executive Committee Member, ICANN Business Constituency & Member, GNSO Council) Consumer Trust, Choice and Competition Perspective – Steve DelBianco (Executive Director, NetChoice & Vice-Chair for Policy Coordination, ICANN Business Constituency) Intellectual Property Rights & IDN Perspective – Hong Xue (Director, Institute for Internet Policy and Law, Beijing Normal University & Member, ccNSO Council) Community - Indigenous Groups’ Perspective - Karaitiana Taiuru (Chair, New Zealand Maori Internet Society) Community - Geographic Names Perspective – Olga Cavalli (Representative of Argentina to the Governmental Advisory Committee & Director, South School on Internet Governance) Developing Country Perspective – Tijani Ben Jemaa (Executive Committee Member, At-Large Advisory Committee & Vice-Chair, African Regional At-Large Organization) ICANN Compliance Perspective - Maguy Serad (Vice-President, Contractual Compliance Services, ICANN) Participation: This roundtable is open. Members of the following ICANN community are especially invited to attend - ICANN At-Large community, ICANN Advisory Committees, ICANN Supporting Organizations, ICANN Board and ICANN Staff. END

1 0

Rena Tangens in German top news tonight
by Wolf Ludwig July 9, 2013

July 9, 2013

Dear all, just to me, it's a sort of highlight to see one of our member ALSes - Digital Courage and Rena Tangens - in the top news of German TV "Tagesthemen" tonight. She was interviewed for the reporting on Data retention practices and legality what is currently arraigned by the European Court in Luxembourg. And Rena raised strong concerns for the protection of user's privacy and interests in the context of common data retention in Europe. Congrats Rena for your continuous struggle on this! Kind regards, Wolf EuroDIG Secretariat http://www.eurodig.org/ mobile +41 79 204 83 87 Skype: Wolf-Ludwig EURALO - ICANN's Regional At-Large Organisation http://euralo.org Profile on LinkedIn http://ch.linkedin.com/in/wolfludwig

1 0

Re: [EURO-Discuss] Cleaning up the Workspace and: Documents!- staff feedback
by Silvia Vivanco July 9, 2013

July 9, 2013

Dear Manuel, Thank you very much for the work you have done cleaning up the EURALO WIKI pages!. The WIKIs are a great tool, but we must keep it updated and do some periodic cleanup. As a general rule, we (staff) do not delete any pages, unless they are a duplicate or no longer needed, but we rather archive them. Older archives contain may contain relevant information such as past officers, background information on past WGs, etc. We would like to ask you and all the EURALO members to please be so kind to work with staff when using/updating/moving the wikis, and let us know the changes you are planning to do, so we can continue monitoring the most relevant spaces and we can assist members finding information when this is needed. Kind regards, Silvia Silvia Vivanco Manager, At-Large Regional Affairs Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: + 1 (202) 570-7119 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Cell/Mobile: +1 (202) 735-7011 -----Original Message----- From: Wolf Ludwig [mailto:wolf.ludwig@comunica-ch.net] Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 9:43 AM To: Discussion for At-Large Europe; Manuel Schneider Cc: Annette Mühlberg; Oliver Passek; ICANN At-Large Staff Subject: Re: [EURO-Discuss] Cleaning up the Workspace and: Documents! Dear Manuel and all, first of all: THANKS for your inputs and tremendous work you invested in and post Lisbon what is MUCH appreciated. Just some explanatory words on the links you provided below: On the first one: Procedure: How to deal with inactive ALSes This is an outcome and working paper from long discussions we had during inter-RALO meetings over the last years and how to deal with this issue. I always rejected the notion of "inactive ALSes" because most of our member ALSes are quite *active* on their local or national ground, even if not participating much on the EURALO or ALAC level. Therefore, I prefer the term "not responding" ALSes what describes the situation or problem much better. And indeed, we have a small number of such ALSes which did not respond to anything (consultations, voting, GA invitations since Paris 2008 and the like) over years and it makes no sense to keep such members listed. So far, there were no further practical steps taken into this direction what could lead to a decertification by ALAC. On the second one on "Strategy 2009 - 11 This was a mandate from the F2F GA in March 2009 in Mexico-City (inline with the first At-Large Summit) when I drafted such a strategic outline for EURALO. This was circulated on the list afterwards (without much response) and included on the Workspace as a "working paper". As we had no more F2F GA meetings after Mexico and until Lisbon recently, it was never "officially" approved by the members or the Board. But it could serve as an input for the Board and related discussions now -- but it would need some updates and "refreshments" ;-) There was quite some work done over the last years and the Wiki became a sort of "file box" for it (but not completed any more the last two years) and hardly used as a main working instrument. Therefore, any cleaning up and better structuring etc. is a great job and big step ahead what makes our all efforts much easier ... Thanks again and kind regards, Wolf Manuel Schneider wrote Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:43: >Dear all, > >yesterday we discussed that I will clean up our workspace a little bit. >While this is mailinglist is our analogy of the phone, meeting room and >pantry (communications), the Wiki is our fileserver, desk and shelf >(workplace and storage). > >I have started creating areas in our Wiki to make it easier to find >stuff. Now I am working through old content to clean up, rename, move >to the right places. > >There are a lot of interesting things to be found on the Wiki! >* >https://community.icann.org/display/EURALO/Procedure%3A+How+to+deal+wit >h+inactive+ALSes > >---> Has that ever been voted on? >* https://community.icann.org/display/EURALO/Strategy+2009-2011 >...and a lot more! > >My goal is to get rid of the "European Regional At-Large Organization >(EURALO)" sub-page which was the top page for everything else in an >otherwise empty workspace. > >That way I am also introducing new templates and get rid of most of the >subpages which make it so hard to find content. Also most of that >content is redundant - we have action items in the minutes as well as >an extra page, we have attachments spread all over the wiki, I found >six versions of the Memorandum of Understanding and three times the Bylaws. >This has now been cleaned up, older minutes will follow. > >At staff: Could you help me to set up new workspace templates? The >workspace administrator can do that. >Copying old pages to create new ones is copying also all the >attachments. The current meeting page has 29 attachments from several >years! A template could do this much easier. > >Regards, > > >Manuel >-- >Wikimedia CH - Verein zur Förderung Freien Wissens Lausanne, +41 (21) >34066-22 - www.wikimedia.ch >_______________________________________________ >EURO-Discuss mailing list >EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org >https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss > >Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org > > EuroDIG Secretariat http://www.eurodig.org/ mobile +41 79 204 83 87 Skype: Wolf-Ludwig EURALO - ICANN's Regional At-Large Organisation http://euralo.org Profile on LinkedIn http://ch.linkedin.com/in/wolfludwig

1 0

ICANN NomCom July 2013 Report Card
by Veronica Cretu July 8, 2013

July 8, 2013

Dear colleagues! A very warm hello and hope this finds everyone well! This is to get back to you with the traditional, monthly NomCom report card - and so attached find please, the July 2013 Report Card. We, at 2013 Nominating Committee, are now deep into the evaluation phase of our work program. This involves detailed analysis of the record breaking 111 Statements Of Interest (SOI) received this year. As a correction to an early NomCom announcement, 111 is the highest number if SOIs received by any NomCom. Due to the intensity of the evaluation work, the NomCom has continued to meet by teleconference on a weekly basis and will do so until committee members meet face to face at the ICANN Durban meeting in mid July. This meeting will be crucial, and a lot of work, for the NomCom as it considers its final shortlist of candidates. The committee will announce Selected Nominees in September 2013. With warm regards and looking forward to see many of you in Durban soon! As ever, Veronica -- *Veronica Cretu * * **President, "CMB" Training Center, **Republic of Moldova - www.cmb.md * *Member of the Steering Committee, * *Open Government Partnership (OGP);* *http://www.opengovpartnership.org/governance-staff-donors*<http://www.opengovpartnership.org/governance-staff-donors> *Member of the Multistakeholder Advisory Group* *To the Internet Governance Forum (IGF)* *http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/* *Member of the Nominating Committee of ICANN* *(Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbering)* *www.icann.org* *Email: veronicacretu(a)gmail.com and/or veronica(a)cretu.md Skype: veronicacretu Phone: 373 067435000*

1 0