March 2007 - EURO-Discuss - lists.icann.org

At-Large Report to the Lisbon Public Forum
by Nick Ashton-Hart March 29, 2007

March 29, 2007

Dear Colleagues: I'm happy to provide you with the Report of the community being presented by ALAC Chair Jacqueline Morris in about 15 minutes in the Lisbon public forum. We hope you are tuned in to the webcast from http://public.icann.org :) -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director, At-Large ICANN PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom Main Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011] USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

3 RALOs Celebrated in Lisbon Today!
by Nick Ashton-Hart March 29, 2007

March 29, 2007

At 1330 GMT, as the finale of the Public Forum at the Lisbon ICANN Meeting, there will be a signing ceremony for two RALOs - Africa and Europe - and a recognition of the conclusion of the Asia/Australia/ Pacific MoU. Those newly-elected in AP and Africa will also be announced. The event will be webcast and scribed, and recorded and made available for download/viewing as a separate event as well as part of the Public Forum. Please see http://public.icann.org for details on watching and listening. The Order of Events is attached for your information. My congratulations to these regions for their achievement - the high- point of a very productive and policy-debate rich meeting for At- Large which I think it is fair to say has given the entire community a great 'bounce' in terms of visibility and credibility with all other constituencies.

1 0

Re: [EURO-Discuss] Why no room for individuals in the RALO?
by Wolfgang Kleinwächter March 28, 2007

March 28, 2007

Rudi can you explain to Wendy? The situation in the room was that one group was in favour of equal rights for individuals (including me) and other who argued that there should be only the ALS. Arguments went forwards and backwards and unfortunately (from my point oif view) irgnoted partly wha has been discussed in this constituencies for years since the cancellation of the elections. The compromise was to allow individuals to join but as noin voting members. They can also join the EURALO Board, but need a nomination from the ALS and the election vote comes from the ALS. However this is preliminary and will be reconsidered by the first General Assembly of EURALO Wolfgang ________________________________ Von: euro-discuss-bounces(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org im Auftrag von Wendy Seltzer Gesendet: Mi 28.03.2007 15:08 An: Discussion for At-Large Europe Betreff: [EURO-Discuss] Why no room for individuals in the RALO? Please help me to understand why you are creating a RALO that excludes individuals who haven't found a congenial ALS. It looks to me as though this structure just further disenfranchises the individuals from ICANN processes. Why should the individual Internet user support this structure? When I asked earlier, I had thought the European group was including individual participants. Why the rush? --Wendy At 08:21 AM 3/28/2007, Nick Ashton-Hart wrote: >Dear European Colleagues: > >For those who are not physically present tomorrow, but would like to >be one of the signers of the MoU, a procedure has been created for you. > >PLEASE SEND IN AS BELOW NOT LATER THAN 1700 THURSDAY 29TH MARCH 2007 > >PLEASE NOTE: There will be a way, as provided by the MoU, to be >determined by the EURALO, for ALSes to consent to be bound by the >MoU at a later date. > >Simply send to me, copied to the list, the following form of words, >with the name of your organisation in place of the brackets, and as >required directly below the sentence: > >------- > >I hereby consent for [INSERT ORGANISATION FULL NAME] to be bound by >the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding between ICANN and the >Signing Organisations in the European Region as if I were personally >signing the document. > >Name >Organisational Title >Date > >---- >Note that I have attached the signature text of the MoU in the >current version. Signatory information will change as the day goes >on and I receive additional signatories' information. -- Wendy Seltzer -- wendy(a)seltzer.org Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html http://www.chillingeffects.org/ _______________________________________________ EURO-Discuss mailing list EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.…

3 4

Signing Ceremony Order of Events
by Nick Ashton-Hart March 28, 2007

March 28, 2007

Dear European Colleagues: Attached you will find the current draft Order of Events for the ceremony tomorrow. Please note that this will be amended to take into account any late signatory information I receive later today. IF ALL SIGNERS COULD MEET ME AT THE SIDE OF THE STAGE NEAR THE DOOR, NEXT TO THE SOUND DESK, at 12:50 PLEASE

1 0

Re: [EURO-Discuss] European Speaker for Ceremony
by Nick Ashton-Hart March 28, 2007

March 28, 2007

I leave it to you to pick the five - just please tell me soon as I have had to script this entire event due to the number of people involved, coming on and off the stage :) We will have you all come on at once, at the podium, as if you were all accepting an Oscar or something :) On 28/03/07, Wolfgang Kleinwächter <wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: > Many faces and many languages is better than many languages and one face. If we have five langauges and five people - 40 second each - we have 2 minutes. The rest of three minutes can be used by one person who say three sentence with subsance, but this three sentence should be agreed by the ALS and should include also a reference to the EURALO as the joint European platform of ALS and partner of the MoU. > > w > > ________________________________ > > Von: Patrick Vande Walle [mailto:patrick@vande-walle.eu] > Gesendet: Mi 28.03.2007 16:32 > An: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org; Discussion for At-Large Europe > Cc: Wolfgang Kleinwächter; aoliva(a)diplomaticnet.com; wolfgang(a)imv.au.dk; kiravuo(a)tml.hut.fi; Patrick(a)isoc.lu > Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] European Speaker for Ceremony > > > > Right. This must be an entertaining performance, not a political tribune. > > My proposal to Rudi would be to have ONE person saying like "Welcome to > Euralo" in all the languages of the ALSes. Whoever is at ease with > foreign languages getsto do it. > Short, simple and hopely funny. > > > Nick Ashton-Hart wrote: > > There is literally a total of five minutes to do this and the staging > > is already quite tight - we simply cannot run over. Having three > > different people come forward, talk, and then call the next forward > > will take lots of time which could be spent by one person saying more... > > > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

2 1

Re: [EURO-Discuss] European Speaker for Ceremony
by Wolfgang Kleinwächter March 28, 2007

March 28, 2007

Many faces and many languages is better than many languages and one face. If we have five langauges and five people - 40 second each - we have 2 minutes. The rest of three minutes can be used by one person who say three sentence with subsance, but this three sentence should be agreed by the ALS and should include also a reference to the EURALO as the joint European platform of ALS and partner of the MoU. w ________________________________ Von: Patrick Vande Walle [mailto:patrick@vande-walle.eu] Gesendet: Mi 28.03.2007 16:32 An: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org; Discussion for At-Large Europe Cc: Wolfgang Kleinwächter; aoliva(a)diplomaticnet.com; wolfgang(a)imv.au.dk; kiravuo(a)tml.hut.fi; Patrick(a)isoc.lu Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] European Speaker for Ceremony Right. This must be an entertaining performance, not a political tribune. My proposal to Rudi would be to have ONE person saying like "Welcome to Euralo" in all the languages of the ALSes. Whoever is at ease with foreign languages getsto do it. Short, simple and hopely funny. Nick Ashton-Hart wrote: > There is literally a total of five minutes to do this and the staging > is already quite tight - we simply cannot run over. Having three > different people come forward, talk, and then call the next forward > will take lots of time which could be spent by one person saying more...

1 0

Re: [EURO-Discuss] not so fast (Re: SIGNERS FOR TOMORROW - URGENT EMAIL)
by Nick Ashton-Hart March 28, 2007

March 28, 2007

See below On 28/03/07, Thomas Roessler <roessler(a)does-not-exist.org> wrote: > > Hi Nick, > > how about an answer to the questions in this message? > > | From: Thomas Roessler <roessler(a)does-not-exist.org> > | To: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org, > | Discussion for At-Large Europe < > euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > | Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:05:55 +0200 > | Subject: Re: [EURO-Discuss] Signing the MoUs > > On another matter, I notice the following in your proposed > electronic signing statement: > > | I hereby consent for [INSERT ORGANISATION FULL NAME] to be bound by > | the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding between ICANN and the > | Signing Organisations in the European Region as if I were personally > | signing the document. > > How does this language (which clearly suggests some kind of binding > effect) mix with this statement of yours to the na-discuss list, > made last Friday? I do not see any conflict. Both sides agree to do several things, and they agree to some benefits. It is an agreement. The fact that it is not intended as a contract for enforcement in courts does not change that both sides are making an agreement with one another. Hopefully that's helpful. | From: "Nick Ashton-Hart" <nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org> > | Subj: Re: [NA-Discuss] Suggestion: Name the public as intended > beneficiary > | of RALO MOUs > | Date: Fri Mar 23, 2007 11:33 am > | Size: 2K > | To: "Wendy Seltzer" <wendy(a)seltzer.com> > | cc: "Michael Maranda" <mmaranda(a)afcn.org>, > na-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > | > | To clarify, as I have been given to understand the MoUs between ICANN > | and the regions is not a contract as that term is understood in law. > | It is an agreement, but not of legal standing such as a contract. > > Thanks for your clarification, > -- > Thomas Roessler <roessler(a)does-not-exist.org> > > > > > > On 2007-03-28 13:13:25 +0100, Nick Ashton-Hart wrote: > > From: Nick Ashton-Hart <nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org> > > To: bruch(a)humanistische-union.de, kiravuo(a)tml.hut.fi, > > Wolfgang Kleinwächter > > <Wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de>, > > wolfgang(a)imv.au.dk, aoliva(a)isoc-cat.org, aoliva(a)diplomaticnet.com, > > dpefeva(a)isoc.bg, patrick(a)vande-walle.eu, Patrick(a)isoc.lu, > > rudi.vansnick(a)isoc.be, sebastien.bachollet(a)isoc.fr > > Cc: Europe Discuss <euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:13:25 +0100 > > Subject: [EURO-Discuss] SIGNERS FOR TOMORROW - URGENT EMAIL > > Reply-To: Discussion for At-Large Europe > > <euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > List-Id: Discussion for At-Large Europe > > <euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org.atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > X-Spam-Level: > > X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.5 > > > > Dear All: > > > > I have heard from the following people with the details required to > finish > > the signature page. > > > > IF YOU ARE NOT ON THE LIST BELOW PLEASE REPLY ASAP (BEFORE END OF DAY > > WEDNESDAY) OR YOU WILL NOT BE ONE OF THE SIGNERS OF THE MOU ON THURSDAY! > > > > Internet Society - Bulgaria > > Signing person: Dragoslava Pefeva > > Position: Coordinator for ALAC > > > > Name of Organisation: Medienstadt Leipzig e.V. > > > > Name of Signer: Wolfgang Kleinwächter > > > > Position of Signer: Member of the Board > > > > > Name of Organisation : Internet Society Belgium > > > > > Name of Signer : Rudi Vansnick > > > > > Position of Signer : Chair > > > > Name of Organisation Internet Society Luxembourg > > > > Name of Signer Patrick Vande Walle > > > > Position of Signer Chairman > > > > Name of Organisation Chapitre français de l'Internet Society – Isoc > > France > > > > Name of Signer Sébastien Bachollet > > > > Position of Signer Président > > > > > > DIGITAL SIGNERS > > > > (SEE SEPARATE EMAIL ON THIS SUBJECT) > > > > Christophe BRUCH > > "German Civil Liberties Union / Humanistische Union" (GCLU) > > > > Board Member > > > > > Name of Organisation: netzwerk neue medien (nnm) - network new media > > (nnm) > > > > > Name of Signer: Annette Muehlberg > > > > > Position of Signer: Chair > > > _______________________________________________ > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.… > > > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

Re: [EURO-Discuss] Signing the MoUs
by Nick Ashton-Hart March 28, 2007

March 28, 2007

On 28/03/07, Thomas Roessler <roessler(a)does-not-exist.org> wrote: > > On 2007-03-28 14:43:21 +0100, Nick Ashton-Hart wrote: > > > My thought, without prejudice to what the legal people might say, > > is that ICANN doesn't really have a preference and the bylaws do > > not provide for ICANN to have such a preference. > > I disagree with the latter; that's part of the questions that you've > chosen to ignore for a while now. > > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.o… I would characterise 'ignoring' as inaccurate, since I have previously stated on two occasions the reason for the delay, which in any case is a matter of hours. It is really unfortunate that you were not here; many of the questions and concerns that you have could have been a part of the discussions and dealt with alongside your colleagues. I hope that you will decide to have enough faith and trust in the other ALSes here to accept that they would not have concluded these arrangements unless they were satisfied that the outcome resulting was worthwhile. > My suggestion to everyone is that we agree the process you wish > > to follow in respect of this element once we have all returned > > home and had some time to get through the elections process and > > address the question of incorporation - it would seem to me that > > the question you raise here, and the question of incorporation, > > are questions which naturally go together. > > > Does that seem sensible to you? > > The more I see of this process, the more I think that all that > should be signed tomorrow is a set of very short letters of intent > in which ICANN and the ALSes state that they: > > (a) intend that a European RALO be formed according to the > principles laid out in the draft materials coordinated > > (b) intend that a formal MoU be signed once EURALO is formed and the > question around individual user participation resolved > > You can still declare victory and hold a ceremony around that. > > Cheers, > -- > Thomas Roessler <roessler(a)does-not-exist.org> > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

Re: [EURO-Discuss] Signing the MoUs
by Nick Ashton-Hart March 28, 2007

March 28, 2007

Thomas, my apologies again for the delay due to the mad pace of events - as a longtime participant of ICANN meetings I'm sure you know what it is like! On 26/03/07, Thomas Roessler <roessler(a)does-not-exist.org> wrote: > > Watching from the distance, I'll admit that I'm a bit confused by > what's going on in Lisbon. > > Some questions... > > - How does the timing of the signing ceremony mix with the public > comment opportunity that ICANN is supposed to give; see > <http://alac.icann.org/framework.htm#ProposedguidelinesforaRALO>, > point 2? There will be a 21-day posting for this MoU. The board will ratify it at this meeting pending the completion of the 21-day comment period, and at the end of that the board will give it final approval. You will find a paragraph near the end of the MoU text which reflects this. - Where are the criteria for the certification of ALSes, per > <http://icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#XI-2.4i>? > > "The criteria and standards for the certification of At-Large > Structures within each Geographic Region shall be established by > the Board based on recommendations from the ALAC and shall be > stated in the Memorandum of Understanding between ICANN and the > RALO for that Geographic Region." These are not incorporated directly in any of the MoUs as they can be changed. The requirements are indirectly referenced by the MoUs though where an acknowledgment of the role that ICANN plays in Clause 5.7 - What is the expectation about incorporating The Organization, what > is the expectation about The Organization's internal processes? > What is the process for agreement on its bylaws? What say will > ICANN have in that? This is of course three questions: 1) The discussion about incorporation is to be held after the voting has been concluded in order to prevent the two issues together actually getting bogged down since they are unrelated, and both take some time - and everyone at the meetings was aware of the fact that everyone is a volunteer and we need to help ensure participation in both to the fullest extent possible. 2) The bylaws agreed here do address these to a very considerable extent and in quite a lot of detail. You also have an additional source of procedure in the draft Rules of Procedure that have been prepared and are available on the regional Wiki which each region is free to use, amend, adopt, or ignore as it wishes. These are for the region to determine. Without actually having The Organization in existence, signing the > MoU looks like a recipe for a considerable mess later on, and it > might take degrees of freedom away that might be useful to have > when negotiating The Organization. I cannot see how that would have an effect to be honest with you. The Bylaws as agreed here are relevant to an unincorporated entity, just as they are to an entity that is incorporated. The members will live by the same set of rules irrespective of the legal status of the organisation (this is the short version of the discussion here). - What is the plan to deal with newly accredited ALSes in the > future; I understand that the LA RALO is actually struggling with > that? <https://st.icann.org/lacralo/index.cgi> Not really struggling. They wish to proceduralise the process of new ALSes consenting to be bound by the terms of the MoU as if they were original signers. I will be helping to supply a form of words for them to do this. - Why are the individual ALSes supposed to sign the MoU, not The > Organization when it's constituted and ready to enter into an > agreement with ICANN? > > This seems inconsistent with the ICANN bylaws: Believe me when I tell you that the ICANN legal staff would hardly allow anything to happen which is inconsistent with the Bylaws. Secondarily, as previously stated, there is no prohibition against the assignment of the signing organisations' rights and responsibilities to the EURALO if incorporated at a later time. "g. There shall be one RALO for each Geographic Region established > according to Section 5 of Article VI. Each RALO shall serve as the > main forum and coordination point for public input to ICANN in its > Geographic Region and shall be a non-profit organization certified > by ICANN according to criteria and standards established by the > Board based on recommendations of the At-Large Advisory Committee. > An organization shall become the recognized RALO for its > Geographic Region upon entering a Memorandum of Understanding with > ICANN addressing the respective roles and responsibilities of > ICANN and the RALO regarding the process for selecting ALAC > members and requirements of openness, participatory opportunities, > transparency, accountability, and diversity in the RALO's > structure and procedures, as well as criteria and standards for > the RALO's constituent At-Large Structures." > > <http://icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#XI-2.4g> > > Besides the formal level, this creates a situation in which ICANN > can play divide and conquer on any proposed changes that might > ever come up. Good for ICANN staff, bad for the RALO. I cannot personally see how this is true. If those who were present here felt this were the case then they would clearly not have concluded their work on this document. I don't think I'll be able to make a recommendation to FITUG to sign > without some very good answers to these questions. Hopefully these will provide it. Note that if FITUG is unable to agree to be a signing organisation, the RALO still includes all ALSes automatically; the only question is if and to what extent non-adherence will affect voting or other rights, which will be entirely a matter for the RALO to decide. Cheers, and apologies that I couldn't make it to Lisbon, > -- > Thomas Roessler <roessler(a)does-not-exist.org> > > > > > > > > > On 2007-03-26 14:19:54 +0100, Nick Ashton-Hart wrote: > > From: Nick Ashton-Hart <nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org> > > To: Discussion for At-Large Europe <euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > >, > > Africa Discuss <afri-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:19:54 +0100 > > Subject: [EURO-Discuss] Signing the MoUs > > Reply-To: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org, > > Discussion for At-Large Europe < > euro-discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > List-Id: Discussion for At-Large Europe > > <euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org.atlarge-lists.icann.org> > > X-Spam-Level: > > X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.5 > > > > Dear African and European Colleagues: > > > > In order for me to prepare the signature texts for the signing ceremony > on > > the Thursday, could those of you intending to sign send me the following > > information as you wish it to appear on the signature texts: > > > > Name of Organisation > > Name of Signer > > Position of Signer > > > > IF YOU ARE LEAVING BEFORE THURSDAY: > > > > If you are leaving before the signing ceremony and wish to sign the > final > > text, I will prepare a signature page early so you can sign in advance. > I > > will then read out your name during the ceremony so that you are > included > > even though you are not physically present :) > > -- > > Regards, > > > > Nick Ashton-Hart > > PO Box 32160 > > London N4 2XY > > United Kingdom > > UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 > > USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 > > Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 > > mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 > > Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / > Skype: > > nashtonhart > > Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart > > > _______________________________________________ > > EURO-Discuss mailing list > > EURO-Discuss(a)atlarge-lists.icann.org > > > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.… > > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

1 0

Re: [EURO-Discuss] European Speaker for Ceremony
by Nick Ashton-Hart March 28, 2007

March 28, 2007

There is literally a total of five minutes to do this and the staging is already quite tight - we simply cannot run over. Having three different people come forward, talk, and then call the next forward will take lots of time which could be spent by one person saying more... On 28/03/07, Wolfgang Kleinwächter < wolfgang.kleinwaechter(a)medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote: > > Probably we shouid have three very short statements presentintg the > diversity of EURALO. I could do one. > > wolfgang > > > ________________________________ > > Von: Nick Ashton-Hart [mailto:nick.ashton-hart@icann.org] > Gesendet: Mi 28.03.2007 14:29 > An: bruch(a)humanistische-union.de; kiravuo(a)tml.hut.fi; Wolfgang > Kleinwächter; wolfgang(a)imv.au.dk; aoliva(a)isoc-cat.org; > aoliva(a)diplomaticnet.com; dpefeva(a)isoc.bg; patrick(a)vande-walle.eu; > Patrick(a)isoc.lu; rudi.vansnick(a)isoc.be; sebastien.bachollet(a)isoc.fr; > Vittorio Bertola > Cc: Europe Discuss > Betreff: European Speaker for Ceremony > > > Dear All: > > There is a 5-minute slot for one representative of each region signing > tomorrow to speak on behalf of the region > Could you all have a word and decide who is to fill this role? > > > -- > Regards, > > > Nick Ashton-Hart > Director, At-Large > ICANN > PO Box 32160 > London N4 2XY > < FONT>United Kingdom > Main Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011] > USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 > Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 > mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 > email: nick.ashton-hart(a)icann.org > Win IM: SPAN class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 10px;; color: > rgb(0, 0, 237); font-family: Arial; ">ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: > nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart > Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart > > > > > > -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart PO Box 32160 London N4 2XY United Kingdom UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011 USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460 Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135 mobile: +44 (7774) 932798 Win IM: ashtonhart(a)hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart(a)mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart

2 1