December 2011 - council - lists.icann.org

Re: Draft JIG Letter
by Stéphane Van Gelder 26 Dec '11

26 Dec '11

Thanks Lesley. Copying the GNSO Council for their information. Happy New Year! Stéphane Le 20 déc. 2011 à 17:21, Lesley Cowley a écrit : > Hi Stephane, > > The ccNSO Council discussed the draft letter to the ICANN Board at length on our call earlier today. > > Whilst the Council remains keen to support single character IDN TLDs, we did not fully support the way forward contained in the letter and therefore resolved to draft a separate ccNSO letter to the Board on this matter. We hope to do so fairly swiftly and I will let you have a copy of the letter as soon as possible. > > I think that this situation will be pretty rare and infrequent, but in due course it would be good to discuss how we best deal with such situations from any joint working groups in future. > > Kind regards, > > Lesley > > Lesley Cowley, OBE > CEO > Nominet > Minerva House > Edmund Halley Road > Oxford Science Park > Oxford, OX4 4DQ > UK > > Tel: +44-(0)-1865-332211 > http://www.nominet.org.uk/

1 0

Fwd: GNSO rep on Geo Regions WG
by Stéphane Van Gelder 26 Dec '11

26 Dec '11

Councillors, FYI. Stéphane Début du message réexpédié : > De : Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com> > Objet : GNSO rep on Geo Regions WG > Date : 26 décembre 2011 18:20:54 HNEC > À : david.archbold(a)icta.ky > > Dear Dave, > > This is to formally advise you that Olga Cavalli has left the GNSO Council and that Ching Chiao has volunteered to take her place as one of the two GNSO reps on the Geo Regions Review WG. > > Wishing you a wonderful New Year. > > Stéphane Van Gelder > GNSO Council Chair >

1 0

Call for volunteers lock of domain name subject to UDRP PDP Drafting Team
by Stéphane Van Gelder 26 Dec '11

26 Dec '11

Councillors, Please find attached a call for volunteers to draft a charter for the UDRP domain locking PDP. Please distribute amongst your groups. Thanks, Stéphane

1 0

Fwd: ICANN / Budget FY13 / SO-AC request process and template
by Stéphane Van Gelder 26 Dec '11

26 Dec '11

Councillors, FYI. Stéphane Début du message réexpédié : > De : "Xavier J. Calvez" <xavier.calvez(a)icann.org> > Objet : Rép : ICANN / Budget FY13 / SO-AC request process and template > Date : 22 décembre 2011 20:48:36 HNEC > À : Marilyn Cade <marilynscade(a)hotmail.com>, Chris Chaplow <chris(a)andalucia.com>, "gchynoweth(a)dyn.com" <gchynoweth(a)dyn.com>, "ocl(a)gih.com" <ocl(a)gih.com>, Lesley Cowley <lesley(a)nominet.org.uk>, Heather Dryden <heather.dryden(a)ic.gc.ca>, "paf(a)cisco.com" <paf(a)cisco.com>, "robin(a)ipjustice.org" <robin(a)ipjustice.org>, Byron Holland <byron.holland(a)cira.ca>, "tonyarholmes(a)btinternet.com" <tonyarholmes(a)btinternet.com>, "k.komaitis(a)strath.ac.uk" <k.komaitis(a)strath.ac.uk>, "dmaher(a)pir.org" <dmaher(a)pir.org>, Roelof Meijer <Roelof.Meijer(a)sidn.nl>, "junsec(a)wide.ad.jp" <junsec(a)wide.ad.jp>, "asterling(a)aamc.org" <asterling(a)aamc.org>, "Metalitz, Steven" <met(a)msk.com>, "stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com" <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com>, "raul(a)lacnic.net" <raul(a)lacnic.net> > Cc : Juan Ojeda <juan.ojeda(a)icann.org>, Aba Diakite <aba.diakite(a)icann.org>, Janice Douma Lange <janice.lange(a)icann.org>, Robert Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth(a)icann.org>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, Heidi Ullrich <Heidi.Ullrich(a)icann.org>, Jeannie Ellers <jeannie.ellers(a)icann.org>, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org>, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen(a)icann.org>, David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org> > > All, > Due to the late realization that various holiday celebration periods across the world stretch to mid January in some regions, we are suggesting to grant a grace a period to provide comments until January 31st. We are not changing the overall timeline, which was defined with a deadline of January 20th so that we can conclude the process in Cost Rica. Therefore, requests received after the deadline of January 20th during the grace period, will be processed after the comments received within the deadline, but will be accommodated nonetheless. > Thanks. > > Sincerely, > Xavier > > Xavier Calvez > ICANN – Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers > CFO > Office: +1 (310) 301-5838 > Cell: +1 (805) 312-0052 > E-fax: +1 (310) 957-2348 > > 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330 > Marina Del Rey, CA 90292 > > From: Xavier Calvez <xavier.calvez(a)icann.org> > Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 12:23:40 -0800 > To: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade(a)hotmail.com>, Chris Chaplow <chris(a)andalucia.com>, "gchynoweth(a)dyn.com" <gchynoweth(a)dyn.com>, "ocl(a)gih.com" <ocl(a)gih.com>, Lesley Cowley <lesley(a)nominet.org.uk>, "raul(a)lacnic.com" <raul(a)lacnic.com>, Heather Dryden <heather.dryden(a)ic.gc.ca>, "paf(a)cisco.com" <paf(a)cisco.com>, "robin(a)ipjustice.org" <robin(a)ipjustice.org>, Byron Holland <byron.holland(a)cira.ca>, "tonyarholmes(a)btinternet.com" <tonyarholmes(a)btinternet.com>, "k.komaitis(a)strath.ac.uk" <k.komaitis(a)strath.ac.uk>, "dmaher(a)pir.org" <dmaher(a)pir.org>, Roelof Meijer <Roelof.Meijer(a)sidn.nl>, "junsec(a)wide.ad.jp" <junsec(a)wide.ad.jp>, "asterling(a)aamc.org" <asterling(a)aamc.org>, "Metalitz, Steven" <met(a)msk.com>, "stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com" <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com> > Cc: Juan Ojeda <juan.ojeda(a)icann.org>, Aba Diakite <aba.diakite(a)icann.org>, Janice Douma Lange <janice.lange(a)icann.org>, Robert Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth(a)icann.org>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, Heidi Ullrich <Heidi.Ullrich(a)icann.org>, Jeannie Ellers <jeannie.ellers(a)icann.org>, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org>, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen(a)icann.org>, David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org> > Subject: ICANN / Budget FY13 / SO-AC request process and template > > All, > > As a reminder, the SO-AC request process below pertains to the dedicated budget that is set aside from the overall ICANN budget to be able to take into account specific requests from the community for activities that are not already included in the recurring ICANN budget. > Please find below a revision to the timeline and process suggested to be retained for the FY 13 Budget "additional request process". We had originally suggested a deadline of December 9th for requests to be submitted, so that such requests are included in the Budget framework, currently scheduled to be posted on January 17th. Instead, we are now proposing to desynchronize the requests timeline from the publication of the framework, as described below. The revised deadline to submit additional requests is therefore January 20th 2012 as indicated in paragraph 3 below. > > The process we are suggesting to retain for FY 13 is as follows: > 1. Please complete the attached request template for each individual new resource or activity that your community is requesting. The form has been designed to give you an opportunity to describe in detail theactual scope of the activity you propose, how it relates to the current Strategic Plan, and how the funds are to be implemented. > > 2. We ask that you give consideration to the number of requests and to the priority of the requests prior to submitting them. By noting the respective priorities of your requests it will make it easier to evaluate the requests from various community groups. Indicating all of them with a high priority will have the opposite effect to the one desired: it will make it more difficult to take into account any of your requests, and/or it will lead the ICANN staff to have to prioritize your request, obviously less adequately than you would. > > 3. Please send each completed request form to the controller(a)icann.org mailbox by January 20th 2012. Though all requests will be examined and processed, the requests will be processed in the order they are received: the earlier your requests enter the process, the more opportunity we collectively will have for review and consideration. > > 4. Each request will be reviewed by a member of the Finance within 48 hours of receipt for a first review to either (i) clarify elements of the request if need be, or (ii) acknowledge receipt. > > 5. All Additional requests will be aggregated for review and selection. A placeholder “additional requests" envelope will be included in the Framework for a total of US$0.5m for all requests. This is the amount that everyone should have in mind when submitting requests. Being a placeholder, we may decide, through the selection process, to change the amount of the envelope suggested for additional requests, dependent upon what conclusions the selection process (see below) reaches. If such is the case, the revised amount will be submitted for approval by the Board Finance Committee, and possibly by the Board. > > 6. ICANN Staff will be suggesting a process to collectively determine which of the additional requests will be retained and incorporated into the FY 13 Budget. The objective is to conclude the selection process with a final list of requests to be included in the budget by the end of the Costa Rica ICANN meeting. > > 7. The Board Finance Committee and ICANN Executive Staff will have the opportunity to review the various requests and discuss them as appropriate with community leaders throughout the entire budget process - from publication of the Framework document through posting the draft Operating Plan and Budget on 1 May 2012. > > 8. Requests that are approved by the ICANN Board will be implemented in FY 13 in conjunction with the ICANN staff and community work. > > Additionally, for newly approved travel support, community leaders will still need to comply with the already established process of filling out the ICANN Constituency Travel template prior to travel to an ICANN meeting or approved alternate meeting. > Our Finance Team is committed to the transparency of the objectives, outcomes and expenditures for each funded request. Detailed implementation plans and finance tracking of each activity and expenditure will greatly improve the likelihood that we will achieve that transparency goal. All approved requests will be located within a “Community Support Services” budget category and will be documented, tracked and expensed. > If you have any questions about these processes or thetemplate, please contact the Finance Team through controller(a)icann.org. This email address will help us manage the documentation and review process and will ensure that your questions are promptly addressed. > To ICANN policy support staff: at the next opportunity, please check with the addressees above that they have effectively received my email as this will be the first email to a number of them. Thank you. > > > Thanks. > > Sincerely, > Xavier > > Xavier Calvez > ICANN – Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers > CFO > Office: +1 (310) 301-5838 > Cell: +1 (805) 312-0052 > E-fax: +1 (310) 957-2348 > > 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330 > Marina Del Rey, CA 90292

1 0

Carlos te ha dejado un mensaje...
by Badoo 26 Dec '11

26 Dec '11

Carlos te ha dejado un mensaje... Sólo tú podrás ver tanto el mensaje como su remitente y lo puedes borrar en cualquier momento. Puedes responder a través del chat de Badoo. Para leer tu mensaje, haz clic en el siguiente enlace: http://eu1.badoo.com/075244364/in/T3pQwE.mOfE/?lang_id=7&m=21&mid=4ef8904a0… Más gente que también te está esperando: Emanuel (Córdoba, Argentina) Emilita (Córdoba, Argentina) Kuko (Córdoba, Argentina) http://eu1.badoo.com/075244364/in/T3pQwE.mOfE/?lang_id=7&m=21&mid=4ef8904a0… Si al pinchar en el enlace de este mensaje no funciona, copia y pégalo en la barra de tu navegador. Este email es parte del proceso de entrega del mensaje enviado por Carlos. Si has recibido este email por error, por favor ignóralo. En un breve periodo de tiempo, la petición será eliminada del sistema. ¡Divértete! El Equipo de Badoo Has recibido este email porque un usuario de Badoo te ha dejado un mensaje en Badoo. Este email ha sido generado de manera automática. Por favor, no respondas a este mensaje ya que no recibirás ninguna contestación. Si no quieres recibir más mensajes de Badoo, indícanoslo: http://eu1.badoo.com/impersonation.phtml?lang_id=7&mail_code=21&email=counc…

1 0

Fwd: [soac-discussion] ICANN Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey
by Stéphane Van Gelder 23 Dec '11

23 Dec '11

Councillors, FYI. And on a side note, a very merry Xmas to all of you, and to all our excellent staff support people. It's been an absolute joy working with you all this past year. I look forward to doing so in 2012. All the best everyone. Stéphane Début du message réexpédié : > De : Kurt Pritz <kurt.pritz(a)icann.org> > Objet : [soac-discussion] ICANN Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey > Date : 22 décembre 2011 21:03:12 HNEC > À : "soac-discussion(a)icann.org" <soac-discussion(a)icann.org> > Cc : David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org>, Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, Akram Atallah <akram.atallah(a)icann.org> > > > Dear ICANN Leader: > > > Thank you for communicating the availability of the ICANN Stakeholder > Satisfaction Survey to your community earlier this month. We are starting > to get good general response from community members but ask that you to > send out a reminder and encourage all members of your community to review > and complete the survey document. > > > Thus far, nearly 350 community members have viewed the survey, but only > about 10% of those viewers have followed through and completed the > document. Most constituencies / stakeholder groups have furnished at > least one response, but some have not our goal is to see broad > participation from all constituencies and stakeholder groups. I think that > this is a valuable opportunity to comment for all stakeholders. Even if > the form or content might not suit some of the initial readers, all should > participate. We seek to improve ICANN and, importantly, we also seek to > demonstrate the vibrancy of the bottom-up policy making community by > strong participation in this survey. > > > Please remind members of your community that the survey link at > http://ICANN-SS-2011.questionpro.com/ will remain open through 3 January > 2012. Personal encouragement you can offer to increase survey completion > would be most appreciated. > > > To reiterate just a bit, the survey is designed to create an initial > baseline of general ICANN stakeholder satisfaction that we can then use to > compare against future results. The more community feedback we get on this > initial survey, the more informative and statistically reliable the > feedback will be and the more responsive we can be to any particular areas > of community > concern. > > > Thanks very much for helping promote this effort. We hope that many > members of your community will participate. > > > > Please accept my best wishes for a joyful, relaxed holiday season. > > Best regards, > > > > Kurt Pritz > >

1 0

Transition of existing PDPs to new GNSO PDP
by Marika Konings 22 Dec '11

22 Dec '11

Dear All, As discussed on the Council meeting last week, please find below an overview of the different Policy Development Processes ongoing and the logical next step in their transition to the new PDP. As a reference, you'll also find attached the overview presented during the meeting which provides further details on each of these next steps. If you have any questions, please let me know. With best regards, Marika ================= Ongoing GNSO PDPs * Issue Report on the current state of all rights protection mechanisms implemented for both existing and new gTLDs, including but not limited to, the UDRP and URS (to be delivered no later than eighteen (18) months following the delegation of the first new gTLD) - Development of Preliminary Issue Report * Uniformity of Contracts – Publication of Preliminary Issue Report for public comment * Law Enforcement Recommendations (currently on hold) - Publication of Preliminary issue Report for public comment * 'Thick' Whois – Delivery of Final Issue Report to the GNSO Council following the closing of the public comment period * RAA – Delivery of Final Issue Report to the GNSO Council following the closing of the public comment period * UDRP (The Requirement to lock a domain name subject to UDRP Proceedings) - Formation of a group to draft the charter for the PDP Working Group. The Council should indicate the timeframe within which a draft PDP Charter is expected to be presented to the GNSO Council for approval. * IRTP Part C – Development of Initial Report, including the elements outlined in the PDP Manual

3 3

Draft minutes GNSO Council meeting 15 December 2011
by Glen de Saint Géry 20 Dec '11

20 Dec '11

Dear Councillors, Attached please find the draft minutes of the GNSO Council meeting held on 15 December 2011. If there are no comments, these minutes will be published on the website as approved, according to the GNSO Rules of Procedure http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-operating-procedures-22sep11-en.pdf section 3.5 "If no objections are received within 10 days, the minutes will be deemed to have been approved for posting." on 3 January 2012. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

ALAC motion asking for the new gTLD program to be delayed
by Stéphane Van Gelder 20 Dec '11

20 Dec '11

Councillors, I thought this might be of interest to you: https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/Updated+ALAC+advice+on+gT… An interesting position for one of ICANN's ACs to take so close to the launch of a program that is the result of community bottom-up discussions… FYI, ALAC (a 15 member body which is to At Large what the GNSO Council is to the GNSO) has a meeting today but my understanding is that there will not be a vote on this motion until early January (they may have another meeting scheduled around Jan 10). And with that, my best wishes to everyone for a lovely Xmas and a very happy New Year. Stéphane

1 0

RE: [council] Fwd: Open letter to ICANN from the Legal Counsels of intergovernmental organisations (IGO's)
by john＠crediblecontext.com 19 Dec '11

19 Dec '11

Stephane, Is there a call to action with this or merely a point of information? Is the Council able to act? If so, what are our options? Berard -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [council] Fwd: Open letter to ICANN from the Legal Counsels of intergovernmental organisations (IGO's) From: Stéphane_Van_Gelder <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com> Date: Sun, December 18, 2011 3:49 am To: GNSO Council <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Councillors, In the context of our own discussions at the end of last week's meeting, please see below the message I was copied on last Friday. Stéphane Début du message réexpédié : > De : <Nicola.BONUCCI(a)oecd.org> > Objet : Open letter to ICANN from the Legal Counsels of intergovernmental organisations (IGO's) > Date : 16 décembre 2011 18:00:27 HNEC > À : <rod.beckstrom(a)icann.org>, <steve(a)shinkuro.com>, <kurt.pritz(a)icann.org> > Cc : <gac(a)gac.icann.org>, <heather.dryden(a)ic.gc.ca>, <jeffrey(a)icann.org>, <amy.stathos(a)icann.org>, <Josee.FECTEAU(a)oecd.org>, <Alexandra.EXCOFFIER-NOSOV(a)oecd.org>, <Jill.SCHUKER(a)oecd.org>, <edward.kwakwa(a)wipo.int>, <bdelachapelle(a)gmail.com>, <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com>, <ocl(a)gih.com>, <DL1516(a)oecd.org> > > Dear Sirs, > > Several additional International Organizations have signed on to the open letter transmitted to you on 13 December. You will find enclosed the same letter containing an updated list of signatories. > > We take this opportunity to also copy the letter to the GNSO President Stephane Van Gelder and the ALAC Chair Olivier Crepin-Leblond. > > Sincerely yours, > > > > Nicola Bonucci > Director & Accession Coordinator / Directeur et coordonnateur de l’adhésion > Directorate for Legal Affairs / Direction des affaires juridiques > > 2, rue André Pascal - 75775 Paris Cedex 16 > Tel: +33 1 45 24 80 77 – Fax: +33 1 44 30 62 45 > nicola.bonucci(a)oecd.org || www.oecd.org > > Follow us on: > >

3 2