December 2014 - council - lists.icann.org

RE: [council] FW: NomCom appointee skill sets
by Winterfeldt, Brian J. May 7, 2015

May 7, 2015

Dear all: Based on recommendations by others, and a shift from the ambiguous to the explicit, I note that intellectual property law is absent from the criteria. Accordingly I would ask for the following amendment.  International law  Competition law  Intellectual property law  Public interest issues  Consumer rights  Human rights  Economics, especially market analysis  Market mechanisms and dynamics  Business principles Thank you, Brian Brian J. Winterfeldt Head of Internet Practice Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP 2900 K Street NW, North Tower - Suite 200 / Washington, DC 20007-5118 p / (202) 625-3562 f / (202) 339-8244 575 Madison Avenue / New York, NY 10022-2585 p / (212) 940.6762 f / (212) 894.5585 brian.winterfeldt(a)kattenlaw.com<mailto:brian.winterfeldt@kattenlaw.com> / www.kattenlaw.com<http://www.kattenlaw.com/> ________________________________________ From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.orgOn<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.orgOn> Behalf OfVolker Greimann Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 8:43:28 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) To: David Cake; jrobinson(a)afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info> Cc: council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: Re: [council] FW: NomCom appointee skill sets I agree with David's suggested additions. instead of financial services businesses, general business experience may be more appropriate. Volker Am 30.10.2014 07:15, schrieb David Cake: > I would consider adding to the list of variable criteria: > - data protection and privacy law > - broader internet governance activities > > I'm also not sure why 'the special needs of financial services businesses' is on that list - not that I have a strong objection to anyone having this expertise, but I do not recall any item of council business having looked at this area in the last couple of years (though it is possible something is slipping my mind). > > David > > On 30 Oct 2014, at 10:02 am, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson(a)afilias.info<mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info>> wrote: > >> <NomCom - GNSO Candidate Criteria.docx> -- Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Volker A. Greimann - Rechtsabteilung - Key-Systems GmbH Im Oberen Werk 1 66386 St. Ingbert Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901 Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851 Email: vgreimann(a)key-systems.net<mailto:vgreimann@key-systems.net> Web: www.key-systems.net<http://www.key-systems.net> / www.RRPproxy.net<http://www.RRPproxy.net> www.domaindiscount24.com<http://www.domaindiscount24.com> / www.BrandShelter.com<http://www.BrandShelter.com> Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook: www.facebook.com/KeySystems<http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems> www.twitter.com/key_systems<http://www.twitter.com/key_systems> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534 Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP www.keydrive.lu<http://www.keydrive.lu> Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen. -------------------------------------------- Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Best regards, Volker A. Greimann - legal department - Key-Systems GmbH Im Oberen Werk 1 66386 St. Ingbert Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901 Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851 Email: vgreimann(a)key-systems.net<mailto:vgreimann@key-systems.net> Web: www.key-systems.net<http://www.key-systems.net> / www.RRPproxy.net<http://www.RRPproxy.net> www.domaindiscount24.com<http://www.domaindiscount24.com> / www.BrandShelter.com<http://www.BrandShelter.com> Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated: www.facebook.com/KeySystems<http://www.facebook.com/KeySystems> www.twitter.com/key_systems<http://www.twitter.com/key_systems> CEO: Alexander Siffrin Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534 Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP www.keydrive.lu<http://www.keydrive.lu> This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone. =========================================================== CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. Please notify the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and delete the original message without making any copies. =========================================================== NOTIFICATION: Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability partnership that has elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997). ===========================================================

14 28

Draft response letter ICANN Board Resolution Concerning Planning for Future gTLD Application Rounds
by Marika Konings Jan. 12, 2015

Jan. 12, 2015

Dear All, As mentioned by Jonathan, please find attached for your consideration a possible Council response to the letter from Steve Crocker concerning the ICANN Board Resolution Concerning Planning for Future gTLD Application Rounds. Best regards, Marika

2 2

Stepping aside the GNSO Council
by Gabriela Szlak Jan. 6, 2015

Jan. 6, 2015

Dear Colleagues, I am very sorry to announce that I am stepping aside the GNSO Council after our next call on the 15th of January 2015. The reason is a very happy one: I am pregnant, expecting for June 2015 and thus, won´t be able to participate in any of the F2F meetings in 2015. We work a lot remotely, but it is also true that most relevant activities occur during f2f meetings. Under the current circumstances, the best for the BC and for the Council was to step aside and have me replaced with someone that will have the opportunity to participate in all activities fully, particularly in such a special year to come, in which the community is dealing with the IANA transition. It was a very hard decision to make but I am confident is for the best. At the BC we are currently hosting elections to select my replacement asap, so for Singapore, a new BC councillor will be already selected. I want to thank everyone, councillors and our great ICANN staff support members, for the honour and the enriching experience that has been working with all of you in representation of the BC at the GNSO Council since November 2013, and in particular to those who have offered me support and guidance all the way through. Muchas Gracias!!!! I have enjoyed the GNSO Council´s work and hope to have the chance to be back at some point in the future. In the meantime, I will still be around, of course, as a BC member representing eInstituto and at the LAC strategy and other ICANN activities, but remotely for some time. Best wishes and Happy 2015 to all!!!!! Gabi *Gabriela Szlak * *Skype:* gabrielaszlak *Twitter: @*GabiSzlak La información contenida en este e-mail es confidencial. The information in this e-mail is confidential.

7 6

Revised comments on the NomCom Recommendations from the Board Working Group
by Tony Holmes Jan. 6, 2015

Jan. 6, 2015

All We discussed the draft Council reply comment on the Nominating Committee Recommendations that John Berard had submitted during the last Council call, agreeing that further comments could be submitted until 31st December and that wed vote electronically early January. The only comments received were from Avri and Ive attempted to capture the points made by amending the draft. Both a marked-up version and clean copy are attached. I would like to propose this draft is put forward for voting fairly quickly in line with the agreed process, unless strong arguments are made against the revised text. Best Wishes to all for a happy and successful 2015. Regards Tony

4 7

Reminder: Timeline: Notification of voting outside a Council meeting: Council reply comment NomCom Recommendations from the Board WG
by Glen de Saint Géry Dec. 31, 2014

Dec. 31, 2014

Dear All, Reminder : Please let me know if you will have issues voting by electronic ballot. The ballots will come from tally(a)icann.org Thank you, Glen Dear Councillors The Council approved at the meeting on 11 December 2014, Voting Outside a Meeting, as described in Section 4.10 in the revised GNSO Operating Procedures<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-13nov14-en.pdf> for the Council's reply comment on the Nominating Committee Recommendations from the Board Working Group. The proposed timeline for this vote is: 1. 31 December 2014 23:59 UTC Final Council reply comment on the Nominating Committee Recommendations from the Board Working Group submitted to the Council mailing list. Tony Holmes to hold the pen on refining the comment<http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/council-comment-nomcom-recommendati…> up to 31 December 2014. 2. Voting by electronic ballot: Voting Opens Saturday, 3 January 2015 Voting Closes on Tuesday 6 January 2015 at 23:59 UTC. If you foresee any connectivity issues during this period, please let me know so that alternate arrangements can be made. 3. 9 January 2015 Comments submitted to the public comment forum<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bwg-nomcom-2014-08-21-en> 4. All Council members, except the non-voting Nominating Committee Appointee are eligible to vote. 4. 10. 2<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-13nov14-en.pdf> Determination; Notice. Voting outside a meeting may only occur when all of the following conditions are met: a. The GNSO Chair determines, after discussion with Council members, that the issue will have been adequately discussed and sufficient time given to each Stakeholder Group and Constituency to consider the issue by the time the vote is called; b. The GNSO Chair determines, after discussion with Council members, that the Council's regular meeting schedule would make it difficult to resolve the issue without scheduling an extra meeting and this would be impractical in light of the circumstances at that time; c. No Councilor objects to the vote being taken outside a regularly scheduled Council meeting; and d. The GNSO Chair provides at least seven (7) calendar days' advance notice of the vote, along with notice of the beginning and ending day and hour of the voting period (in UTC), which period shall not be less than four (4) calendar days. 4. 10.3.1<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-13nov14-en.pdf> Guidelines for Voting Outside a Meeting As with votes taken during a regularly scheduled GNSO Council meeting, all votes taken outside a meeting will: a. Be open (i.e., not by secret ballot); b. Allow for the inclusion of voting statements in accordance with Section 4.3.2 of these Operating Procedures; and c. Have their outcomes published and recorded, with accompanying voter statements, if any, as minutes for purposes of formal record keeping. These items are to be prepared and approved in accordance with Section 3.5 of these Operating Procedures, except that the relevant time period shall commence with the ending of the voting period. 4.10.3.2 Voting outside a meeting should normally be by electronic means. Methods used to transmit and record votes taken outside of meetings shall be authenticated and verifiable using the same criteria and applying the same standards as those used for absentee ballots under Section 4.4.3 of these Operating Procedures. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org<http://gnso.icann.org/>

1 0

Document and Motion deadline Monday, 5 January 2015 at 23:59 UTC for Council meeting 15 January 2015 at 18:00 UTC
by Glen de Saint Géry Dec. 31, 2014

Dec. 31, 2014

Dear Councillors, Reports, motions and documents for consideration are due no later than (NLT) 10 days in advance (i.e. MONDAY, 5 January 2015 at 23:59 UTC) of the GNSO Council meeting on 15 January 2015 at 18:00 UTC. Motions should be sent to the Council mailing list and will then be posted on the Wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+15+January+… Thank you very much. Happy New Year ! Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Notification of voting outside a Council meeting: Council reply comment Nominating Committee Recommendations from the Board Working Group
by Glen de Saint Géry Dec. 17, 2014

Dec. 17, 2014

Dear Councillors The Council approved at the meeting on 11 December 2014, Voting Outside a Meeting, as described in Section 4.10 in the revised GNSO Operating Procedures<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-13nov14-en.pdf> for the Council's reply comment on the Nominating Committee Recommendations from the Board Working Group. The proposed timeline for this vote is: 1. 31 December 2014 23:59 UTC Final Council reply comment on the Nominating Committee Recommendations from the Board Working Group submitted to the Council mailing list. Tony Holmes to hold the pen on refining the comment<http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/council-comment-nomcom-recommendati…> up to 31 December 2014. 2. Voting by electronic ballot: Voting Opens Saturday, 3 January 2015 Voting Closes on Tuesday 6 January 2015 at 23:59 UTC. If you foresee any connectivity issues during this period, please let me know so that alternate arrangements can be made. 3. 9 January 2015 Comments submitted to the public comment forum<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bwg-nomcom-2014-08-21-en> 4. All Council members, except the non-voting Nominating Committee Appointee are eligible to vote. 4. 10. 2<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-13nov14-en.pdf> Determination; Notice. Voting outside a meeting may only occur when all of the following conditions are met: a. The GNSO Chair determines, after discussion with Council members, that the issue will have been adequately discussed and sufficient time given to each Stakeholder Group and Constituency to consider the issue by the time the vote is called; b. The GNSO Chair determines, after discussion with Council members, that the Council's regular meeting schedule would make it difficult to resolve the issue without scheduling an extra meeting and this would be impractical in light of the circumstances at that time; c. No Councilor objects to the vote being taken outside a regularly scheduled Council meeting; and d. The GNSO Chair provides at least seven (7) calendar days' advance notice of the vote, along with notice of the beginning and ending day and hour of the voting period (in UTC), which period shall not be less than four (4) calendar days. 4. 10.3.1<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-13nov14-en.pdf> Guidelines for Voting Outside a Meeting As with votes taken during a regularly scheduled GNSO Council meeting, all votes taken outside a meeting will: a. Be open (i.e., not by secret ballot); b. Allow for the inclusion of voting statements in accordance with Section 4.3.2 of these Operating Procedures; and c. Have their outcomes published and recorded, with accompanying voter statements, if any, as minutes for purposes of formal record keeping. These items are to be prepared and approved in accordance with Section 3.5 of these Operating Procedures, except that the relevant time period shall commence with the ending of the voting period. 4.10.3.2 Voting outside a meeting should normally be by electronic means. Methods used to transmit and record votes taken outside of meetings shall be authenticated and verifiable using the same criteria and applying the same standards as those used for absentee ballots under Section 4.4.3 of these Operating Procedures. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org<http://gnso.icann.org/>

1 0

Selection of Advisors to the Enhancing ICANN Accountability Process
by Glen de Saint Géry Dec. 17, 2014

Dec. 17, 2014

https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-12-17-en Selection of Advisors to the Enhancing ICANN Accountability Process The Accountability & Governance Public Experts Group<https://community.icann.org/x/_wPxAg> (PEG) announces the selection of Advisors to the Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (CCWG). As stated in the revised Enhancing ICANN Accountability and Governance Process<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/process-next-steps-2014-10-10-en> from 10 October, The Public Experts Group (PEG) was tasked<https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-08-19-en> with selecting up to 7 Advisors to the CCWG. Through the course of its work, the PEG identified<https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2014-10-16-en> the following areas of expertise as critical to the process and to the evaluation of Advisor candidates: * Board Governance and Corporate Management (for example operational, finance, risk management) * Global Accountability and Transparency - theoretical, practical, tools and metrics * Global Ethics Frameworks and Human Rights (for example consumer protection) * Governmental Engagement and Relations and Multistakeholder Governance * International Law/ Jurisprudence (for example choice of law) The PEG is pleased to announce the following individuals, serving in their personal capacities as Advisors to the CCWG: Roberto Bissio, Executive Director of the Instituto del Tercer Mundo -- Area of Expertise: Global Ethics Frameworks and Human Rights (for example consumer protection) William Currie, Consultant in ICT Policy and Regulation -- Area of Expertise: Governmental Engagement and Relations and Multistakeholder Governance Valerie D'Costa, Program Manager at infoDev -- Area of Expertise: Governmental Engagement and Relations and Multistakeholder Governance Ira Magaziner, Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the Clinton Health Access Initiative -- Area of Expertise: Governmental Engagement and Relations and Multistakeholder Governance Nell Minow, Shareholder Advocate -- Area of Expertise: Board Governance and Corporate Management (for example operational, finance, risk management Jan Scholte, Professor, University of Gothenburg and University of Warwick -- Area of Expertise: Global Accountability and Transparency - theoretical, practical, tools and metrics The Advisors roles are to contribute research and advice, and to bring perspectives on global best practices to enrich the discussion, all while engaging with a broader network of accountability experts from around the world. The PEG continues its search for an Advisor who will bring expertise in International Law/Jurisprudence and will strive to select this Advisor as soon as possible. Once the PEG has concluded its work, it will no longer be active in the Enhancing ICANN Accountability Process. However, the PEG notes that the Enhancing ICANN Accountability Process considered that while the PEG's formal task is to select Advisors, PEG members could continue to be available provide additional assistance if there is an identified need for further independent input or expertise. ________________________________ The members of the PEG are: Ms. Jeanette Hoffman, Director, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society; Ambassador Janis Karklins, Latvian Ambassador. Chair of the Multi-stakeholder Advisory Group (MAG); Mr. Larry Strickling, NTIA Administrator and Assistant Secretary for Communication and Information of the U.S. Department of Commerce; and Mr. Brian Cute, Chief Executive Officer, Public Interest Registry. Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org<http://gnso.icann.org/>

1 0

Council response on GNSO Review
by Tony Holmes Dec. 16, 2014

Dec. 16, 2014

All Just a polite reminder we agreed that input on the draft response from Council to the GNSO review could be received until 31st December and Council would then vote electronically early January. To date no proposed revisions have been received. Best wishes for the festive season to all. Tony

2 2

FW: Status Update of GNSO Review
by Glen de Saint Géry Dec. 15, 2014

Dec. 15, 2014

In behalf of: Jen Wolfe Sent: lundi 15 décembre 2014 17:17 Dear GNSO Council and GNSO leadership, I hope everyone is having a great holiday season! I'd like to update you on the progress of the review and provide you with the revised schedule. Westlake team will deliver the Working Text and staff will organize the wiki space to capture the feedback and views from the GNSO Review Working Party on 2 January 2015. The GNSO Review Working Party will have until 30 January to provide consolidated comments on the Working Text back to Westlake. This will ensure sufficient time to review the Working Text, without interfering with everyone's holiday. Two special meetings of the GNSO Review Working Party will be scheduled in January. It will be very important to have full participation from the Working Party, representing the various stakeholder and constituency groups, to actively participate in providing feedback. Once Westlake has received feedback from the Working Party, they will prepare the draft report to be released. Providing comments on the Working Text allows the GNSO Review Working Party to offer feedback before it is publicly released and ensure any real or perceived inaccuracies are addressed, as well as begin to capture issues for further discussion as the Review process moves forward. Westlake will then draft their report which will be posted for Public Comment at the end of February, for the GNSO as a whole, along with the rest of the ICANN community to provide feedback. Please see the schedule below for further details. Key dates are also available on the GNSO Review wiki<https://community.icann.org/x/OJLhAg>. For your reference, I am forwarding an email from Richard Westlake, which provides a brief overview of the status of the 360 Assessment survey, interviews conducted and overall review methodology. If you have any questions or would like clarification on any issue related to the Review, please don't hesitate to reach out to me directly and I will be happy to respond as quickly as possible to ensure any concerns are addressed prior to the release of the report. I am happy to be available during upcoming Council meetings to answer questions and will look forward to a more detailed briefing with Council in Singapore. Wishing you all a joyous holiday season and New Year! Jen GNSO Review: Important Dates Working text for the GNSO Review Working Party and Staff for clarification and comments (distributed and posted on the wiki) 2 January 2015 GNSO Review Working Party working session #1 - Westlake Briefing 16 January 201518:00 UTC GNSO Review Working Party working session #2 - discussion, Q&A 22 January 18:00 UTC Consolidated comments on Working Text due to Westlake from GNSO Review Working Party and Staff 30 January Updates and discussions during ICANN52 8-12 February; public session date TBD Draft Report delivered by Westlake 20 February Draft Report posted for public comment 27 February Public Comment period (42 days) 27 February - 10 April Final Report 30 April (tentative, depending on volume and nature of public comments) Update from Richard Westlake Dear Jen and Larisa, Following recent questions about Westlake's review methods and individual interviews, I should like to highlight some points to reiterate why we consider that we have collected extensive, diverse, balanced and fact-based sets of data. We have and will continue to apply our professional expertise and independent perspective to ensure a high-quality useful final report, and we note that many of our observations and recommendations will be a matter of informed subject judgment in addition to, and based largely on, our research findings. 1. The GNSO Review Methodology formulated by the Structural Improvement Committee and used as the basis for the Request for Proposal, Westlake's response, and the Terms of Reference/Scope of Work consisted of three data collection mechanisms: a. 360 Assessment designed to collect feedback from GNSO, other SOs/ACs, Board and Staff (quantitative and qualitative) - our primary and critical component. In addition (and outside the scope originally envisaged), following feedback and advice, we added the Supplementary Working Group 360 Assessment, to provide a greater depth of information on the WGs; b. Review of documents and records; c. Limited interviews to fill in the gaps. (As you know, the GNSO Review Working Party has provided substantive feedback and guidance on the review methodology, including extensive input into the formulation of the 360 Assessment and Supplementary WG 360.) 2. We and ICANN staff carried out extensive outreach and engagement efforts between July and October, to encourage participation in the 360 Assessment, including two extensions to allow ample time for people to respond - see chart below. These efforts resulted in 178 completed responses from a broad and diverse group of people by the time the 360 closed at the end of ICANN51. 3. From the start, Westlake advocated for the interview component to be given more weight (both in our original response to the RfP and subsequently). This led to a modification in the original plans to enable our team to attend ICANN51, where we spoke to many people and attended many of the SG/C meetings, providing us with a first-hand view of GNSO proceedings. We contacted an extensive list of relevant people - including some, but not all, SG/C chairs - before the LA meeting. We successfully conducted interviews, in person and subsequently over the phone, with about 27 individuals to date and likely to total about 30. Several people we contacted failed even to respond, despite several attempts and others have been unable to make time to speak to us. Since LA, we have again tried to contact several people with only limited response. Although we are at a very late stage, we still aim to speak to a few more people. 4. Our team has reviewed extensive documents relating to the implementation of earlier review recommendations, along with other documentation, and has analysed records detailing the work of the GNSO. 5. The data our team has gathered from these channels has been extensive and in our view sufficiently broad and diverse to support our observations, leading to findings and recommendations that we shall include in our Draft Report. As a further opportunity for feedback, before we finalise our report, there will be additional opportunities for the GNSO and others to offer their views: a. The GNSO Review Working Party will review our Working Text and engage in a dialogue to clarify, expand and correct information, as appropriate. We will be particularly interested in this group's feedback on the usefulness and practicality of our draft recommendations. b. An overview will be presented in a session at ICANN52 in February, with another opportunity to provide feedback. c. The formal Public Comment Period will open in February and the feedback will be considered as we prepare our Final Report. d. We will continue to work closely with the GNSO Review Working Party through the balance of the Review. I trust that this information covers your questions about our methodology and any remaining concerns about our interviews. Please contact me again if you need any additional information. Have a good weekend! Kind regards Richard Richard G A Westlake Westlake Governance GNSO Review Statistics 360 Assessment: -- Main survey 152 completed responses (250 started) -- Supplementary survey (WG) 26 completed responses (50 started) Total 178 completed responses 60% completion rate Interviews: 27 to date, likely total 30+ (Plus several other shorter informal discussions, mainly in LA) GNSO Review Working Party meetings: 13 Engagement: -- Announcements page views 1,709 -- Blog page views 2,957 Outreach: -- Webinars 3 -- Update presentations 14 -- Blogs 2 -- Videos 2 -- FAQ Brochures and Post cards distributed at ICANN51 3,000 jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2801 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM

1 0