April 2006 - council - lists.icann.org

Statement of Interests for Ross Rader
by Ross Rader 14 Oct '06

14 Oct '06

Statement of Interests I am the Director of Research and Innovation for Tucows Inc., an ICANN accredited registrar and internet services vendor. Tucows is a minority shareholder in Afilias LLC, with roughly an 8% shareholding. Neither Tucows, nor I, is in possession of, nor have access to Registry Sensitive or Registry Proprietary information as defined by any relevant registry operating contracts as a result of this relationship. Tucows provides consulting and application hosting services to other registrars and internet services providers. I am not an officer, director, consultant, or employee of any of these customer organizations nor am I specifically involved in providing services to them. The URL for this statement is: http://www.byte.org/blog/_WebPages/StatementofInterestsforRossRader.html -ross

2 2

Online Workshop Ideas
by Bret Fausett 12 May '06

12 May '06

The key to a successful online workshop is for people to give the same time and attention to the work online as they would give to a face-to-face meeting. We would also need the assistance of the GNSO's Staff members to facilitate the workshop. Here's one conception of what an online work session might look like: Pre-Workshop: Each Council member reads the public comments, constituency reports and submitted papers on the Terms of Reference. (Time estimate 4-6 hours) Monday, Day 1: Each Council member drafts his or her own contribution in response to the various items in the Terms of Reference. To the extent they thought appropriate, councilors could work within their constituencies, or divide work among multiple constituencies, to prepare responses. (Time estimate: 3-4 hours per Council member.) By the end of the first day, council members could either submit their responses to Staff by e-mail or place them directly on a wiki page. Staff would create a web or wiki page for each submission, identifying the Council member or members who worked on a submission. Tuesday, Day 2: Each Council member reads the responses submitted on the previous day and posts questions, comments or responses. (Time estimate: 3-4 hours per Council member.) At the end of the second day, staff updates the web or wiki page for each submission with the questions and comments. Wednesday, Day 3: Council members read all of the questions, comments, and responses, submitted with respect to both their own original submission and all other submissions. Council members revise their original submissions to clarify or modify their original responses. Council members also answer any questions, either in a modification to their original submission or in a separate Q&A section. (Time estimate: 3-4 hours per Council member.) Thursday and Friday, Days 4-5: Staff Work Days. Staff reviews all submissions, questions, amendments, etc. posted over the first three days. Staff looks for common threads, shared values, etc. to prepare a report of agreed items. Staff also identifies areas of disagreement. To the extent that items are contested, Staff tries to identify majority and minority positions. By the end of Day 5, Staff posts a paper summarizing the submissions, identifying areas of consensus and majority and minority positions on contested issues. Most importantly, in the posted paper, Staff suggests possible compromises among various positions on contested items in an attempt to narrow any areas of disagreement. Weekend, Days 6-7: Councilors read the Staff paper. Monday, Day 8: Each Council member drafts responses to Staff paper. The primary purpose of the response is to address any inaccuracies in the Staff report and to respond to any proposals for compromise. (Time estimate: 3-4 hours per Council member.) Tuesday, Day 9: Real-time conference call to review status of work and discuss areas of agreement. (Time estimate: 2 hours) Staff work day following conference call. Wednesday, Day 10: Staff posts final paper, revising it to include corrections submited by Council members and responses to compromise proposals. Thursday, Day 11: Council votes on whether the report accurately summarizes the discussions. If approved, the report is posted on the ICANN and GNSO web pages for public comment. ----------- This sort of online work would take the same level of effort we would give to a three-day work session, with travel, and distribute it over approximately a two-week period. We would each work on our own time and in our own locations, but we would agree to perform the day's designated task within the set 24-hour period. -- Bret

2 1

RE: [council] Online Workshop Ideas
by Bruce Tonkin 30 Apr '06

30 Apr '06

Hello Bret, Thanks for outlining this idea. It might be something for the PDP-Feb06 PDP to consider as it has yet to start its policy considerations. I will also pass onto the WHOIS task force to see if they would like to try something different. The approach does rely on each member of the group actually putting in the work over a sustained period of time. That is always the hard part. I guess each member of the group probably needs to explicitly commit to doing that work. I expect that the approach may work better with some shorter teleconferences mixed in as well. I doubt it will be as effective as some concentrated face-to-face time, but it could be significantly better than the other current approach of mailing lists with infrequent teleconferences to debate process. Has the ALAC tried this approach yet? Regards, Bruce Tonkin

2 1

At-Large Newsletter Feb/Mar
by Bret Fausett 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

FYI -----Original Message----- From: owner-alac(a)icann.org [mailto:owner-alac@icann.org] On Behalf Of ICANN At-Large - Denise Michel Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 6:44 PM To: At-Large Advisory Committee (publicly archived) Subject: [alac] At-Large Newsletter Feb/Mar ICANN AT-LARGE NEWSLETTER In this issue: . Action: THINK YOU CAN DO BETTER? - If you are interested in helping to lead ICANN (or know someone who is) now is the time to apply for a position on ICANN's Board, the ALAC, or a Supporting Organizations' Council. Recommendations and statements of interest are being sought by ICANN's Nominating Committee. More information and application forms are available at <http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-18apr06.htm>. . Action: CAN REGISTRY POLICIES & CONTRACTS BENEFIT USERS? - Of course they can. But to what degree do they? The GNSO Council is seeking public comments on developing policies on several issues that apply to generic top level domains (gTLDs) (eg. price controls), rather than treating them as matters to negotiate with each Registry separately on a contract by contract basis. The ALAC is considering all this in terms of users' interests and welcomes your input. Public comments are needed by 30 April. More information is posted at <http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-16mar06.htm>. . Information: CHECK-OUT WWW.ICANNALAC.ORG - Members of the ALAC created a new website -- www.icannalac.org -- for the At-Large community. It is intended to help inform and encourage a dialogue among members of ICANN's At-Large community about domain name system issues that affect the world's Internet users. At-Large community members are encouraged to register and share thoughts, announcements, news and commentary relating to ICANN and the interests of individual Internet users. . Information: SOMETHING'S MISSING IN THE DNS - A majority of the world's Internet users can't have a domain name in their own language (using non-Latin scripts). ICANN established guidelines for the introduction of Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) on the second level of the DNS (domain name system) last year, and now the ICANN President's Advisory Committee on IDNs has proposed a timetable leading to the technical testing of IDNs in top level domains (the TLD level). More information is posted at <http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-14mar06.htm>. The ALAC's latest IDN statement is posted at <http://icann.org/meetings/wellington/alac-idn-statement-27mar06.htm>. . Information: IF YOU MISSED THE AT-LARGE FORUMS ON NEW TLDs & IDNs, CATCH THEM ON-LINE - At the recent Asia-Pacific ICANN meeting in Wellington, the ALAC sponsored a forum on how to launch a new top level domain selection process that enhances user and registrant choice worldwide, and a workshop to educate and inform users on implementing internationalized domain names (IDNs) so the world's non-English speaking communities can use domain names in their own language. An Asia-Pacific At-Large Organizing meeting and ALAC meetings also were held in Wellington. For those who couldn't make it to New Zealand, audio files and wiki notes have been posted by attendees. It's almost like being there. . Information: AT-LARGE NOW EXTRA-LARGE - At-Large continues to grow, welcoming its newest user groups: Privaterra, based in Canada; Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail, based in the USA; Internet Society Hong Kong, based in P.R. China; Internet Society Quebec, based in Canada; and CAUCE Canada. Thirty-eight organizations have registered as "At-Large Structures" and applications are pending from 14 more groups worldwide that want to involve individual Internet users in ICANN. Join a group or form a new one. Information is posted at <http://alac.icann.org/announcements/announcement-23may05.htm>. . Information: NEW ALAC CHAIR: At the ICANN Wellington meeting, ALAC member Annette Muehlberg took over for the ALAC's founding Chair, Vittorio Bertola. The ALAC joins the ICANN community in thanking Vittorio for his dedicated leadership and vision in launching and leading the ALAC and the growing network of At-Large user groups. . Dates to Watch: o 30 April 2006 - Public comments due on Policies for Contractual Conditions for Existing Registries <http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-16mar06.htm>. o 30 April 2006 - On line survey for review of the GNSO closes. Take the survey at <http://www.icann-gnsoreview.org/>, or contact the research team at +44 207 955 6064 or via email at <j.tinkler(a)lse.ac.uk>. o 5 May 2006 - Papers due on Policies for Contractual Conditions for Existing Registries <http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-11apr06.htm>. o 10 May 2006 - ICANN Board consideration of the proposed .XXX registry agreement <http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-20apr06.htm>. o 26-30 June 2006 - ICANN meeting in Marrakech, Morocco < http://icann.org/meetings/>. o 16 July 2006 - Statements of Interest for ICANN leadership positions due to the Nominating Committee <http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-18apr06.htm>. ________________________________________ . Action: THINK YOU CAN DO BETTER? - If you are interested in helping to lead ICANN (or know someone who is) now is the time to apply for a position on ICANN's Board, the ALAC, or a Supporting Organizations' Council. Recommendations and statements of interest are being sought by ICANN's Nominating Committee. More information and application forms are available at <http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-18apr06.htm>. Statements of interest for the following positions are being accepted: . Three members of the ICANN Board of Directors . One member of the Council of the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) . One member of the Council of the Country-Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO) . Two members of the At Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) ICANN's Nominating Committee will be appointing individuals to these positions this Fall. The Committee, as always, includes five delegates from At-Large (one from each geographic region; see <http://alac.icann.org/announcements/announcement-08feb06.htm>). It is an independent committee responsible for selecting a majority of the members of ICANN's Board and other positions within ICANN. The Nominating Committee states that individuals it selects "will have a unique opportunity to work with accomplished colleagues from around the globe, address the Internet's intriguing technical coordination problems and policy development challenges with diverse functional, cultural, and geographic dimensions, and gain valuable insights and experience from working across boundaries of knowledge, responsibility and perspective. Additionally, those selected will gain the satisfaction of making a valuable public service contribution." More information on the positions to be filled is posted at <http://www.icann.org/committees/nom-comm/formal-call-2006.html>. . Action: CAN REGISTRY POLICIES & CONTRACTS BENEFIT USERS? - Of course they can. But to what degree do they? The GNSO Council is seeking public comments on developing policies on several issues that apply to generic top level domains (gTLDs) (eg. price controls), rather than treating them as matters to negotiate with each Registry separately on a contract by contract basis. The ALAC is considering all this in terms of users' interests and welcomes your input. Public comments are needed by 30 April. More information is posted at <http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-16mar06.htm>. On 2 March 2006, the GNSO Council launched a policy development process (PDP) on "Policies for contractual conditions for existing gTLDs." It arose out of the Council's consideration of the .NET and .COM agreements, as well as issues surrounding the introduction of new gTLDs. The overall goal of this policy development process is "to determine what policies are appropriate for the future of gTLDs within the context of ICANN's mission and core values, that relate to the issues identified in the specific terms of reference below." The Council is specifically seeking public comments related to: 1. Registry agreement renewal 2. Relationship between registry agreements and consensus policies 3. Policy for price controls for registry services 4. ICANN fees 5. Uses of registry data 6. Investments in development and infrastructure Please submit comments to the Council at <gtld-policies-tor(a)icann.org> and make sure you share your views with the At-Large community at our new website <www.icannalac.org> so we know what your think. . Information: CHECK-OUT WWW.ICANNALAC.ORG - Members of the ALAC created a new website -- www.icannalac.org -- for the At-Large community. It is intended to help inform and encourage a dialogue among members of ICANN's At-Large community about domain name system issues that affect the world's Internet users. At-Large community members are encouraged to register and share thoughts, announcements, news and commentary relating to ICANN and the interests of individual Internet users. The new website is run by the members of the ALAC, for the use and benefit of you, the users. It is not run by ICANN and is independent of <www.icann.org>. It features news and commentary on hot topics, on line discussions organized by issues, photos, newsletters, and more. . Information: SOMETHING'S MISSING IN THE DNS - A majority of the world's Internet users can't have a domain name in their own language (using non-Latin scripts). ICANN established guidelines for the introduction of Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) on the second level of the DNS (domain name system) last year, and now the ICANN President's Advisory Committee on IDNs has proposed a timetable leading to the technical testing of IDNs in top level domains (the TLD level). More information is posted at <http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-14mar06.htm>. The ALAC's latest IDN statement is posted at <http://icann.org/meetings/wellington/alac-idn-statement-27mar06.htm>. The President's Advisory Committee on IDNs is preparing a proposal for a technical test of internationalized top level domain labels. Representatives from all regions of the world are taking part in the discussion of the technical test, which will include two approaches to the insertion of IDN records into the root zone of the DNS. According to ICANN, "the test procedure will ensure that enabling multiple languages at the top level will not adversely affect users. It will also establish the technical methods that are available for such deployment and will enable ICANN's policy development bodies to move forward with their ongoing work with regard to policy decisions essential to a production environment in which users will be able to access the Internet using their local languages." The ALAC recently held an IDN Workshop for users at the ICANN meeting in Wellington, and issued an IDN statement outlining key principles to guide IDN implementation. See <http://icann.org/meetings/wellington/agenda-idn-28mar06.htm> and <http://icann.org/meetings/wellington/alac-idn-statement-27mar06.htm> for more information. Share your views, questions, and suggestions on IDNs at our new website <www.icannalac.org>. . Information: IF YOU MISSED THE AT-LARGE FORUMS ON NEW TLDs & IDNs, CATCH THEM ON-LINE - At the recent Asia-Pacific ICANN meeting in Wellington, the ALAC sponsored a forum on how to launch a new top level domain selection process that enhances user and registrant choice worldwide, and a workshop to educate and inform users on implementing internationalized domain names (IDNs) so the world's non-English speaking communities can use domain names in their own language. An Asia-Pacific At-Large Organizing meeting and ALAC meetings also were held in Wellington. For those who couldn't make it to New Zealand, audio files and wiki notes have been posted by attendees. It's almost like being there. (Note: the notes and audio files were not created by ICANN and are not posted on ICANN's website). - At-Large New TLDs forum: <http://icannwiki.org/IUF_2006_03_26> - At-Large IDN Workshop: (audience notes) <http://icannwiki.org/IUW_2006_03_28>; (audio file) <http://blog.lextext.com/blog/_archives/2006/3/27/1845496.html#attachments>; (agenda and slides) <http://icann.org/meetings/wellington/agenda-idn-28mar06.htm>) - Other sessions: (links to audience notes) <http://icannwiki.org/Wellington_Schedule_%26_Session_Notes> After you've had a chance to review this wealth of information, don't forget to share your thoughts with the At-Large community and the ALAC at our new website <www.icannalac.org>. . Information: AT-LARGE NOW EXTRA-LARGE - At-Large continues to grow, welcoming its newest user groups: Privaterra, based in Canada; Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial E-mail, based in the USA; Internet Society Hong Kong, based in P.R. China; Internet Society Quebec, based in Canada; and CAUCE Canada. Thirty-eight organizations have registered as "At-Large Structures" and applications are pending from 14 more groups worldwide that want to involve individual Internet users in ICANN. Join a group or form a new one. Information is posted at <http://alac.icann.org/announcements/announcement-23may05.htm>. . Information: NEW ALAC CHAIR: At the ICANN Wellington meeting, ALAC member Annette Muehlberg took over for the ALAC's founding Chair, Vittorio Bertola. The ALAC joins the ICANN community in thanking Vittorio for his dedicated leadership and vision in launching and leading the ALAC and the growing network of At-Large user groups. The Interim At-Large Advisory Committee alac(a)icann.org www.icannalac.org If a group you are involved with wants to influence decisions that shape the Internet, register as an "At-Large Structure" and participate in ICANN decisions critical to the Internet's end users. "At-Large Structure" registration is free, easy, and done via email. Groups interested participating in ICANN At-Large are encouraged to send an email to <als(a)alac.icann.org> or get more information and an application on line < www.alac.icann.org/applications/>.

1 0

Re: [gtld-council] Draft Agenda for Brussels meeting - 11 May to 13 May
by Norbert Klein 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Thanks, Bret and Maureen, for raising this question of a fairly late re-scheduling and the consequences. Obviously I was wrong when I assumed for quite some time that the consensus had already moved to later in May. Norbert = Cubberley, Maureen (CHT) wrote: > Bret, Glen and All, > > Bret, I agree with your observations and I'm beginning to think it is > ill-advised to proceed with the meeting. > > I will be unable to attend in person. Given the importance of the task > force work (PDP feb 06), and its relationship to what we plan to work on > in Brussels, I am disappointed that the timing and travel logistics > preclude my direct participation. (Even with juggling my schedule, I > just can't get to Brussels and back in time to meet other business > commitments.) > > Aside from, and more important than my own individual regret, is the > fact that there will be so few participants at what I understand is > intended to be a session of the entire Council, consistent with the PDP > process we have adopted for this work on new TLDs. > > It seems to me that we have too few in-person participants to proceed as > planned, and I would support the idea of re-scheduling, or finding > another way to "meet", perhaps something consistent with what Bret has > suggested. > > Best regards, > Maureen > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-gtld-council(a)gnso.icann.org > [mailto:owner-gtld-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Bret Fausett > Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 2:17 PM > To: robin(a)ipjustice.org; gtld-council(a)gnso.icann.org > Subject: RE: [gtld-council] Draft Agenda for Brussels meeting - 11 May > to 13 May > > Glen, > > Do you have a head count yet for the Brussels meeting? Given the > substantial > number of apologies, I wonder whether a face-to-face meeting for this > place > and time is still appropriate. Perhaps we could substitute some focused > time, in our own locales, on a wiki or other Internet-based forum. > > Bret > > >

1 0

Template for seconding nominations
by GNSO.SECRETARIAT＠GNSO.ICANN.ORG 28 Apr '06

28 Apr '06

[To: council[at]gnso.icann.org] Dear Council Members, Please note that a template for seconding nominations is now available at: http://gnso.icann.org/announcements/announcement-21apr06.htm Reminder that the call for nominations by members of the GNSO Council for candidates to stand for ICANN Board Seat 14 will run until Saturday 6 May 2006 at 17:00 UTC. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat - ICANN gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

RE: [council] Policy Development work in Marrakech in June 2006
by Bruce Tonkin 28 Apr '06

28 Apr '06

Hello Philip, > > The provision of a GNSO room for the entire week in NZ was a > welcome and excellent innovation. > Lets make this a standard request for each and every ICANN meeting. Agreed - this was useful. The reason for the email was to ensure that the definition of "entire" week is Saturday 24 June to Saturday 1 July, rather than Monday to Friday. > and meetings for each PDP in the way we have done in the > past. Or am I just getting grumpy in my old age ? ) We do need to plan major task force meetings to ensure that the relevant members of such task forces can: (a) Make appropriate travel arrangements (b) read the relevant documents and come prepared Regards, Bruce Tonkin

1 0

Policy Development work in Marrakech in June 2006
by Bruce Tonkin 28 Apr '06

28 Apr '06

Hello All, The Marrakech, Morocco meeting is scheduled for: Monday 26 June 2006 to Friday 30 June 2006. We should start to give some consideration to what policy development meetings we should have. We have the option of booking meeting room space for the Saturday 24/Sunday 25 June prior to the start of the Marrakech meeting. I am hoping that the PDP-Dec05 work on new gTLDs will be in a public comment phase on a comprehensive initial report, so we probably don't need substantial policy development time for that PDP. The two other PDPs underway are the WHOIS PDP, and the PDP-Feb06 on contractual conditions for existing gTLDs. The Brussels meeting should be good preparation for PDP-Feb06, so it might be useful to spend one or days on advancing that work. The WHOIS work seems to be inching along as ever - I think it might also be useful to schedule a 1-2 day workshop in parallel with the work on PDP-Feb06 to really see if we can get a proposal for the community to consider on terms of reference 3: "Determine what data collected should be available for public access in the context of the purpose of WHOIS. Determine how to access data that is not available for public access." I note that it appears that the WHOIS policy discussion is now being handled by the media (e.g see recent Wall Street Journal article). I have seen some unsupported conclusions for a future service coming out of the recent vote on WHOIS purpose. The only way to address this seems to be to create a concrete proposal for possible changes to the WHOIS service for providing public access to some of the data that is collected by registrars that can be discussed more rationally with the wider community. I am interested in the views of Council members, and also task force members on how best to use the time in Marrakech. Regards, Bruce Tonkin Chair, GNSO Council

3 2

Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] FW: Some more Brussels Meetings Logistics
by Norbert Klein 28 Apr '06

28 Apr '06

May I just add also my name to these concerns of Marilyn (though we have not yet decided in the NCUC constituency who will participate). Especially in view of the very short notice change of dates from the end of May to 11/13 May, some others might have similar scheduling problems. Norbert = Marilyn Cade wrote: > Dear all > Thanks for the update, and it is very good that we have ICANN funding for at > least one rep per constituency. However, I will not be able to comply with > the instructions regarding travel arrangements. Not feasible, or I fear, > even reasonable. :-) > I won't be alone, I suspect. Due to the change in meeting dates, I have had > to reschedule several other meetings, and will be coming to > Brussels, then going to Stockholm, and then going to Geneva. I have meetings > back to back in Stockholm and then in Geneva, and will not have time to > return home from the Brussels trip before being "due" in Stockholm. > > I assume that the suggestion that we arrange the most direct, economy class > airfare can be met by my arranging to only give ICANN the portion of the > trip that is reasonably related to that leg of the trip -- e.g. airfare to > Brussels from US, and return airfare approximate to the cost of a return > from Brussels to US. :-) >

1 0

RE: Marilyn Cade: announcement of interest in standing for election to the ICANN board--note time/date error in original email
by Marilyn Cade 27 Apr '06

27 Apr '06

Please note that the date and time stamp on the email below is wrong. I had a mother board meltdown and the technician and I failed to note the time/date stamp got quite screwed up. SORRY. I just fixed it, I hope. In any case, for the record, it is Thursday p.m. EST 4:33 pm. HOPEFULLY,the date/time stamp agrees with that. Apologies for the confusing date/stamp on the original email I posted to the Council, and to others. :-) The content is correct, however, in the email below. Marilyn Cade _____ From: Marilyn Cade [mailto:marilynscade@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 2:30 PM To: 'GNSO.SECRETARIAT(a)GNSO.ICANN.ORG'; 'council(a)gnso.icann.org' Cc: 'John Jeffrey' Subject: Marilyn Cade: announcement of interest in standing for election to the ICANN board Dear colleagues, I wanted to announce my resignation from the Nominating Committee as a representative from the BC, and advise fellow councilors of my interest in standing for election to the vacant Board seat now open for nomination. In order to stand for election, I have advised the Nominating Committee that I am resigning [from the Nominating Committee]and have asked to be removed from the Nominating Committee list and activities. In order to be fully transparent, I advise the Council that I am disputing an interpretation by the General Counsel regarding my eligibility to stand for election due to the Nominating Committee service. I have filed an ombudsman's appeal and am preparing a Reconsideration Request. In my view, I am fully qualified, now that I have resigned from the Nominating committee to be a candidate for election. The General Counsel has disagreed with my eligibility status, thus my appeals through the ombudsman, and possibly Reconsideration. I don't mean to clog the Council list with this topic, since that would be inappropriate, but please do let me know of any questions you may have. If nominated and seconded, then I'll have a chance to campaign, like any other candidate. At this point, the purpose of this posting is informational. Best regards, Marilyn Cade

1 0