August 2016 - council - lists.icann.org

FW: [Correspondence] Letter from Steve Crocker to James Bladel, Chair, GNSO Council
by James M. Bladel 22 Sep '16

22 Sep '16

Councilors - Attached, please find a letter form Steve Crocker/ICANN Board to the Council, regarding the work on subsequent rounds of New gTLDs. (Per Wendy's note, the letter has not yet been posted on the ICANN Correspondence page, but expected soon). Note that the letter contains a specific request to the GNSO: 'For example, assuming all other review activities are completed, it would be helpful to understand whether the GNSO believes that the entirety of the current Subsequent Procedures PDP must be completed prior to advancing a new application process under the current policy recommendations. The Board is cognizant that it may be difficult to provide a firm answer at this stage of the process as the reviews are still underway and the PDP is in its initial stages of work, but if any consideration has been given in relation to whether a future application process could proceed while policy work continues and be iteratively applied to the process for allocating new gTLDs, or that a set of critical issues could be identified to be addressed prior to a new application process, the Board would welcome that input. The Board would also welcome any elaboration on the expected time frame outlined in the PDP Work Plan, as well as any additional points the GNSO might wish to clarify for the Board in its efforts to support the various areas of work underway in the multistakeholder community'. I propose that we add this question/topic, and the letter itself, to our 1 SEP meeting agenda as a discussion item, and that we examine ideas on how to proceed on responding to this question. If this is amenable, I would also ask Staff to draft a brief note to Steve, acknowledging the receipt of this letter and noting that it would be discussed during our next meeting. Thoughts on this approach? Thank you, J. From: Wendy Profit <wendy.profit(a)icann.org<mailto:wendy.profit@icann.org>> Date: Friday, August 5, 2016 at 14:19 To: James Bladel <jbladel(a)godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>>, Glen de Saint Géry <gnso-secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso-secretariat@gnso.icann.org>>, Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Cc: Steve Crocker <steve.crocker(a)board.icann.org<mailto:steve.crocker@board.icann.org>>, Icann-board ICANN <icann-board(a)icann.org<mailto:icann-board@icann.org>>, board-support <board-support(a)icann.org<mailto:board-support@icann.org>>, Akram Atallah <akram.atallah(a)icann.org<mailto:akram.atallah@icann.org>>, Erika Randall <erika.randall(a)icann.org<mailto:erika.randall@icann.org>>, Daniel Halloran <daniel.halloran(a)icann.org<mailto:daniel.halloran@icann.org>>, Eleeza Agopian <eleeza.agopian(a)icann.org<mailto:eleeza.agopian@icann.org>>, Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund(a)icann.org<mailto:jamie.hedlund@icann.org>>, Karen Lentz <karen.lentz(a)icann.org<mailto:karen.lentz@icann.org>>, Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi(a)icann.org<mailto:cyrus.namazi@icann.org>>, Cristina Flores <cristina.flores(a)icann.org<mailto:cristina.flores@icann.org>> Subject: [Correspondence] Letter from Steve Crocker to James Bladel, Chair, GNSO Council Dear James Bladel, Please find the attached letter from Steve Crocker, Chair, ICANN Board of Directors regarding subsequent New gTLD rounds. The letter will be posted shortly to the ICANN Correspondence and New gTLD Correspondence pages: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/correspondence https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/correspondence With warm regards, Wendy Profit ICANN Board Operations Specialist

8 7

FYI : ISPCP GNSO Councilor Election (2016 - 2018): Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
by Glen de Saint Géry 31 Aug '16

31 Aug '16

FYI Subject: ISPCP GNSO Councilor Election (2016 - 2018): Wolf-Ulrich Knoben Dear Glen, This email confirms that Wolf-Ulrich Knoben has been reelected as the ISPCP GNSO Councilor and will serve for the 2016 - 2018 term. Kind regards, Chantelle

1 0

RE: [liaison6c] Updated Proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting on 1 September 2016 at 12:00 UTC
by Paul McGrady 31 Aug '16

31 Aug '16

Thanks Glen. Fellow Councilors: regarding item #6, I am the liaison to the Subsequent Procedures WG. The co-chairs, Avri Doria and Jeff Newman, both of whom need no introduction, have volunteered to provide whatever information they may have to help us in our deliberations on a reply to Dr. Crocker. While Phil has already expressed some views, I think it will be important to loop in the leadership of the Subsequent Procedures WG to ensure that our reply at the Council level reflects the sentiment in the community as best we can. Best, Paul Paul D. McGrady, Jr. policy(a)paulmcgrady.com From: owner-liaison6c(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-liaison6c@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 6:01 PM To: liaison6c <liaison6c(a)gnso.icann.org> Subject: [liaison6c] Updated Proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting on 1 September 2016 at 12:00 UTC Dear Councillors, Please find the updated proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting on 1 September 2016 at 12:00 UTC. This agenda is also published on the Wiki page at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Agenda+1+September+2 016 and on the website at: https://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/agenda-council-01sep16-en.htm Please note that the updates refer to: Item 10: Any Other Business (10 minutes) 10.1 Discussion of note from Chris Disspain on status of IGO acronyms protection work (https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/disspain-to-gnso-council-22aug16-e n.pdf) <https://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/docxwBd6RaeZsW.docx)> 10.2 Confirmation of Council liaisons to the the Translation & Transliteration of gTLD Contact Data PDP, IRTP-C PDP, IRTP-D PDP and GNSO Review Working Group 10.3 - Timeline for GNSO Chair/Vice-Chair elections leading up to and at ICANN57 to be shared following meeting Councillors encouraged to share any questions / concerns with mailing list 10.4 Proposed Measures for Letter/Letter Two-Character ASCII Labels to Avoid Confusion with Corresponding Country Code Please note that all documents referenced in the agenda have been gathered on a Wiki page for convenience and easier access: https://community.icann.org/x/MBWsAw This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures, <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-24jun15-en.pdf> approved and updated on 24 June 2015. For convenience: * An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is provided in Appendix 1 at the end of this agenda. * An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the absentee voting procedures is provided in Appendix 2 at the end of this agenda. Coordinated Universal Time: 12:00 UTC http://tinyurl.com/hbwu5tf 05:00 Los Angeles; 08:00 Washington; 13:00 London; 15:00 Istanbul; 22:00 Hobart GNSO Council Meeting Audio Cast To join the event click on the link: http://stream.icann.org:8000/gnso.m3u Councilors should notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if they will not be able to attend and/or need a dial out call. ___________________________________________ Item 1: Administrative matters (5 minutes) 1.1 Roll call 1.2 Updates to Statements of Interest 1.3 Review/amend agenda. 1.4 Note the status of minutes for the previous Council meetings per the GNSO Operating Procedures: Minutes of the GNSO Council Meeting on 21 July 2016 <https://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/minutes-council-21jul16-en.htm> were approved on 27 August 2016. Item 2: Opening Remarks / Review of Projects & Action List (5 minutes) 2.1 Review focus areas and provide updates on specific key themes / topics, to include review of Projects List <http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/projects-list.pdf> and <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Action+Items> Action List Item 3: Consent agenda (5 minutes) 3.1 Confirm dates for selection of GAC-GNSO liaison (motion passed on 30 June 2016) based on updated ICANN57 meeting dates: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+30+June+2016 Motion as passed, with dates to be updated highlighted as indicated below: Resolved: 1. The GNSO Council hereby confirms the extension of the term of the current GNSO Liaison to the GAC, Mason Cole, until the end of the ICANN AGM in Hyderabad. 2. The GNSO Council instructs the GNSO Secretariat to inform the GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies of the extended selection timeline (Nominations Accepted for Candidates - 1 OCT 2016; Council Chairs consider candidates and notify first choice - 20 OCT; Chairs submit motion to Council by 29 OCT (change to 28 October) for consideration during Council meeting on 8 NOV (change to 7 November); GAC Leadership notified of new Liaison by 9 NOV). Item 4: COUNCIL VOTE Approval of Recommendations from the Standing Committee on GNSO Improvements (10 minutes) In April 2015 the GNSO Council requested that the Standing Committee on GNSO Improvements (SCI) document the existing customary practices of the GNSO Council concerning (i) whether, how and by whom a properly submitted motion before the Council is to be seconded, and (ii) the treatment of proposed amendments to such motions as either friendly or unfriendly. The Councils request also authorized the SCI to develop new processes for these practices if the SCI believed that the current practices are inappropriate. Separately, in November 2015, the GNSO Council requested that the SCI review Sections 2.2(b), (f) and (g) of the GNSO Operating Procedures with respect to, first, clarifying: (i) the eligibility of incoming Council members to run for the position of GNSO Chair; (ii) the start and end dates as well as the duration of the Chair and Vice-Chair terms in accordance with the ICANN Bylaws; and (iii) the timing of publication of the election results; and, secondly, recommending a general time table for election of the GNSO Chair. In October 2015 and in accordance with the Councils April request, the SCI sent its documentation of the Councils practices on the seconding and amendment of motions to the Council (see https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/aikman-scalese-vansnick-to-robinson -09oct15-en.pdf). Subsequently, the SCI reached Full Consensus on a proposal to codify the current customary practices in the GNSO Operating Procedures as a new Section 3.3.3: Submitting, Seconding, and Amending Motions. With respect to its review of the rules governing the GNSO Chair and Vice-Chair elections, the SCI reached Full Consensus on modifications to Section 2.2 and a proposal for a new Section 2.2.1: Procedures for a Situation Where a New GNSO Chair Has Not Been Elected by the End of the Previous Chair's Term in the GNSO Operating Procedures. The SCIs proposals were published for public comment on 5 July 2016 (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-op-procedures-2016-07-05-en). By the close of the public comment period on 14 August, two public comments had been received supporting the SCIs proposals (https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-op-procedures-05jul16/). Here the Council will consider whether or not to approve the SCIs recommendations for modifying the GNSO Operating Procedures as proposed. 4.1 Presentation of the motion <https://community.icann.org/x/FQObAw> (Amr Elsadr) 4.2 Discussion 4.3 Council vote (voting threshold: simple majority) Item 5: COUNCIL VOTE Adoption of Implementation Advisory Group Recommendations to Update Procedure on WHOIS Conflicts with National Laws (15 minutes) The GNSOs 2005 Policy on WHOIS Conflicts with National Laws (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/whois-privacy/council-rpt-18jan06.htm) had recommended the creation of a procedure to address conflicts between a contracted party's WHOIS obligations and local/national privacy laws or regulations. Under the existing procedure dating from January 2008, a contracted party that credibly demonstrates that it is legally prevented from complying with its WHOIS obligations can invoke the procedure, which defines a credible demonstration as one in which the contracted party has received "notification of an investigation, litigation, regulatory proceeding or other government or civil action that might affect its compliance." The procedure has never been invoked. In May 2014, ICANN launched a review of the procedure. An Implementation Advisory Group (IAG) was formed and began its work in January 2015. The IAGs Initial Report was published for public comment in November 2015 (see https://www.icann.org/public-comments/iag-whois-conflicts-privacy-2015-10-05 -en). On 25 May 2016, the IAGs <http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/pdf1nt18yPBer.pdf> Final Report, accompanying <http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/pdfC9Dr9B5OBO.pdf> Appendices and a summary <http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/pdfZPGKEDdzDq.pdf> Memo to the GNSO Council was delivered to the GNSO Council. The IAG proposed modifications to the procedure that it believes do not affect the underlying Policy. The Council received an update on the proposed modifications at ICANN56 and discussed the matter further at its meeting on 21 July. Here the Council will confirm whether or not the IAGs proposed modifications conform with the underlying GNSO Policy. 5.1 Presentation of the motion <https://community.icann.org/x/FQObAw> (James Bladel) 5.2 Discussion 5.3 Council vote (voting threshold: simple majority) Item 6: COUNCIL DISCUSSION ICANN Board Letter on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures (20 minutes) On 5 August 2016, ICANN Board Chair Dr. Steve Crocker sent a letter to the GNSO Council concerning work on the GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures (https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/crocker-to-bladel-05aug16-en.pdf). The Board wished to know the GNSO Councils view of the current work in light of the existing GNSO policy and ongoing parallel review work on the 2012 New gTLD Program. The Board letter specifically asked for information on the PDP timeline and whether the GNSO believes that the current PDP must be completed prior to advancing a new application process under the current policy recommendations, including whether any consideration has been given in relation to whether a future application process could proceed while policy work continues and be iteratively applied to the process for allocating new gTLDs. On 16 August the GNSO Chairs sent a reply to the Board on behalf of the Council, acknowledging the Boards request (https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/council-leadership-to-crocker-16au g16-en.pdf). Here the Council will discuss the subject of the Boards letter and its further response, including whether or not input from the PDP Working Group may be helpful. 6.1 Status update on the Board letter and PDP progress (James Bladel / Paul McGrady) 6.2 Discussion 6.3 Next steps Item 7: COUNCIL DISCUSSION Next Steps for the Cross Community Working Group on Internet Governance (10 minutes) The <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/52888213/Charter%20ccWG%20 IG%202014%20v05.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1423208903000&api=v2> Charter for this Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) was <https://community.icann.org/x/oQInAw> ratified by the ccNSO Council (September 2014), the GNSO Council (October 2014), and the ALAC (April 2015). The ratified Charter provides that the CCWG scope includes doing whatever it deems relevant and necessary to facilitate and ensure engagement and participation of the ICANN community in the global Internet governance scene and multi-stakeholder decision-making processes, with regular monthly updates to be provided to its Chartering Organizations and a periodic Progress Paper where appropriate. The Charter also provides that the Chartering Organizations should review the Charter and CCWG deliverables in order to determine whether the group should continue or be dissolved, with the proviso that the CCWG will continue if at least two of its Chartering Organizations extend the Charter and notify the other Chartering Organizations accordingly. At ICANN55, there was some discussion over the most appropriate forum for SO/AC interaction on Internet governance matters, especially given the expected forthcoming finalization of a Uniform Framework of Principles for Future CCWGs. The co-chairs of the CCWG-IG provided the Council with a Progress Report on its recent activities at ICANN56. Here the Council will discuss appropriate next steps in relation to overseeing the work of the CCWG. 7.1 Review of status of Council discussion (James Bladel) 7.2 Discussion 7.3 - Next steps Item 8: COUNCIL DISCUSSION Proposed Cost Control Mechanisms and Request for GNSO Council Validation of the Budget for the Cross Community Working Group on Ensuring ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountability) (15 minutes) On 10 July, the GNSO Council requested that the ICANN Board Finance Committee and the CCWG-Accountability co-chairs conduct a webinar to brief the Council and broader GNSO community on the Proposed Cost Control Mechanisms and the CCWG-Accountabilitys request for the GNSO Council to validate the proposed FY17 budget for the CCWG-Accountability (https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/bladel-to-bfc-ccwg-accountability- chairs-10jul16-en.pdf). The proposed budget and costs had been reported to the GNSO Council on 21 June (https://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg18841.html)The requested webinar took place on 23 August. Here the Council will discuss the CCWG-Accountabilitys request for the Council to validate the proposed FY17 budget in light of the further information provided during the webinar (recording and slides available at: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/p8fu99qpt7d/. 8.1 Status update (James Bladel) 8.2 Discussion 8.3 Next steps Item 9: COUNCIL DISCUSSION Planning and Scheduling for ICANN57 (15 minutes) ICANN57 will take place in Hyderabad, India, from 3-9 November 2016. This will be the first Meeting C under the new ICANN Meeting Strategy as well as the Annual General Meeting for ICANN. A <http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/meeting-c-schedule-11jul16-en.pdf> draft GNSO schedule for the meeting was circulated to the GNSO Council on 11 July 2016 and reviewed at the Council meeting on 21 July. Here the Council will review all proposed GNSO sessions for ICANN57 in relation to the meeting schedule, including the face to face Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group meetings, the customary annual Development Session for incoming and continuing GNSO Councilors, and the submission of High Interest Topics of interest to the GNSO. 9.1 Overview of the proposed schedule (James Bladel) 9.2 Discussion 9.3 Next steps Item 10: Any Other Business (10 minutes) 10.1 Discussion of note from Chris Disspain on status of IGO acronyms protection work (https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/disspain-to-gnso-council-22aug16-e n.pdf) <https://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/docxwBd6RaeZsW.docx)> 10.2 Confirmation of Council liaisons to the the Translation & Transliteration of gTLD Contact Data PDP, IRTP-C PDP, IRTP-D PDP and GNSO Review Working Group 10.3 - Timeline for GNSO Chair/Vice-Chair elections leading up to and at ICANN57 to be shared following meeting Councillors encouraged to share any questions / concerns with mailing list 10.4 Proposed Measures for Letter/Letter Two-Character ASCII Labels to Avoid Confusion with Corresponding Country Code Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X, Section 3) 9. Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, Annex A hereto, or the GNSO Operating Procedures, the default threshold to pass a GNSO Council motion or other voting action requires a simple majority vote of each House. The voting thresholds described below shall apply to the following GNSO actions: a. Create an Issues Report: requires an affirmative vote of more than one-fourth (1/4) vote of each House or majority of one House. b. Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as described in <http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA> Annex A): requires an affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than two-thirds (2/3) of one House. c. Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of GNSO Supermajority. d. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than two-thirds (2/3) of one House. e. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority. f. Changes to an Approved PDP Team Charter: For any PDP Team Charter approved under d. or e. above, the GNSO Council may approve an amendment to the Charter through a simple majority vote of each House. g. Terminate a PDP: Once initiated, and prior to the publication of a Final Report, the GNSO Council may terminate a PDP only for significant cause, upon a motion that passes with a GNSO Supermajority Vote in favor of termination. h. Approve a PDP Recommendation Without a GNSO Supermajority: requires an affirmative vote of a majority of each House and further requires that one GNSO Council member representative of at least 3 of the 4 Stakeholder Groups supports the Recommendation. i. Approve a PDP Recommendation With a GNSO Supermajority: requires an affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority, j. Approve a PDP Recommendation Imposing New Obligations on Certain Contracting Parties: where an ICANN contract provision specifies that "a two-thirds vote of the council" demonstrates the presence of a consensus, the GNSO Supermajority vote threshold will have to be met or exceeded. k. Modification of Approved PDP Recommendation: Prior to Final Approval by the ICANN Board, an Approved PDP Recommendation may be modified or amended by the GNSO Council with a GNSO Supermajority vote. l. A "GNSO Supermajority" shall mean: (a) two-thirds (2/3) of the Council members of each House, or (b) three-fourths (3/4) of one House and a majority of the other House." Appendix 2: Absentee Voting Procedures ( <http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-operating-procedures-22sep11-en.pdf> GNSO Operating Procedures 4.4) 4.4.1 Applicability Absentee voting is permitted for the following limited number of Council motions or measures. a. Initiate a Policy Development Process (PDP); b. Approve a PDP recommendation; c. Recommend amendments to the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) or ICANN Bylaws; d. Fill a Council position open for election. 4.4.2 Absentee ballots, when permitted, must be submitted within the announced time limit, which shall be 72 hours from the meeting's adjournment. In exceptional circumstances, announced at the time of the vote, the Chair may reduce this time to 24 hours or extend the time to 7 calendar days, provided such amendment is verbally confirmed by all Vice-Chairs present. 4.4.3 The GNSO Secretariat will administer, record, and tabulate absentee votes according to these procedures and will provide reasonable means for transmitting and authenticating absentee ballots, which could include voting by telephone, e- mail, web-based interface, or other technologies as may become available. 4.4.4 Absentee balloting does not affect quorum requirements. (There must be a quorum for the meeting in which the vote is initiated.) Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 12:00 Local time between October and March Winter in the NORTHERN hemisphere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- California, USA (PDT <http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/na/pst.html> ) UTC-7+0DST 05:00 San José, Costa Rica UTC-5+0DST 07:00 Iowa City, USA (CDT <http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTC%E2%88%9206:00> ) UTC-5+0DST 07:00 New York/Washington DC, USA (EST) UTC-4+0DST 08:00 Buenos Aires, Argentina (ART <http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/sa/art.html> ) UTC-3+0DST 09:00 Rio de Janiero, Brazil (BRST) UTC-3+0DST 09:00 London, United Kingdom (BST) UTC+0DST 13:00 Bonn, Germany (CET) UTC+1+0DST 14:00 Cairo, Egypt, (EET) UTC+2+0DST 14:00 Istanbul, Turkey (EEST) UTC+3+0DST 15:00 Perth, Australia (WST <http://timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/au/wst.html> ) UTC+8+0DST 20:00 Singapore (SGT) UTC +8 +0DST 20:00 Sydney/Hobart, Australia (AEDT) UTC+11+0DST 22:00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- DST starts/ends on last Sunday of October 2016, 2:00 or 3:00 local time (with exceptions) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For other places see <http://www.timeanddate.com/> http://www.timeanddate.com http://tinyurl.com/hbwu5tf Glen de Saint Géry Manager Supporting Organisations Advisory Committees Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers - ICANN <mailto:glen@icann.org> glen(a)icann.org <http://www.icann.org/> http://www.icann.org Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our <http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> interactive courses and visiting the <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy- efforts.htm#newcomers> GNSO Newcomer pages.

2 2

FW: GNSO Council Abstention Notification Form [#211]
by Glen de Saint Géry 31 Aug '16

31 Aug '16

FYI From: ICANN [mailto:no-reply@wufoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 9:30 PM To: gnso.secretariat(a)icann.org; council(a)gnso.icann.org Subject: GNSO Council Abstention Notification Form [#211] Name of Officer: * Graeme Bunton Officer Email Address: * gbunton(a)tucows.com<mailto:gbunton@tucows.com> Date Prepared: * Wednesday, August 31, 2016 GNSO Organization: * Registrars Stakeholder Group Officer Position or Title: * Chair Voting Remedy: * Proxy Reason(s) for or condition(s) leading to the remedy: * We do not currently have a 3rd GNSO councilor, owing to a bylaw conflict. Specific subject(s)/measure(s)/motion(s)/action(s) of the Council for which the remedy is being exercised: * Any and/or all council votes. Date upon which the remedy will expire or terminate: [Note: may not exceed 3 months initially; may be renewed by sending an email with explanation to GNSO Secretariat] * Saturday, October 15, 2016 I affirm that a voting position has been established on the matter(s) at issue pursuant to provisions contained in our Charter or Bylaws. * Yes Our GNSO Councilor has been instructed on how to vote on the matter(s). * Yes Please identify the GNSO Councilor who will serve as the voting proxy: * Volker Greimann

1 0

Improvements to f2f GNSO meeting planning?
by Heather Forrest 31 Aug '16

31 Aug '16

Dear Council colleagues, With the meeting request notice having been sent round to the leaders of Cs and SGs recently, I'm wondering if now is an opportune time to raise some concerns raised by both Houses about the process of developing the GNSO meeting schedule. The two main concerns I've heard are that 1) the decision-making process of which GNSO meetings get onto the ICANN schedule isn't very transparent and 2) there isn't a clear rationale for this task falling to the Council Vice Chairs, given the limited remit of Council under the Bylaws. I'd have to say I agree with both. My understanding is that some years ago, there was a community volunteer-populated "meetings committee", but that this died a slow death as it met infrequently, was too large to be effective, and struggled to meet difficult deadlines. It faded into nothingness, and our GNSO support staff took up the task. When concerns were raised about staff making the scheduling decisions, staff brought the Vice Chairs into the process. I don't think we can fully alleviate these concerns prior to Hyderabad, but we can try to shift our practices to introduce an opportunity for input from the broader GNSO community. What I'm thinking is that if SGs and Cs are willing and able to get their meeting requests in a few days earlier than the 12 Sept deadline (say, one week after the upcoming Council meeting, so Sept. 8th) then the Vice Chairs (sorry, Donna, I'm volunteering us for speedy action) could ASAP assess requests and circulate a list showing the outcome of that assessment to the GNSO community (via SG/C chairs or Councillors, whichever seems most efficient/suitable) for comment/input before the request list gets submitted to the ICANN scheduling team. SGs and Cs who aren't able to get their requests in early won't benefit from this simply because we're to short on time for this meeting, and even the turnaround for comment on those that are submitted in time won't be generous. That said, this could be an experiment, and if we start Copenhagen planning immediately with this kind of process, I hope we can achieve the twin goals of getting the community involved and meeting our scheduling deadlines with a workable schedule as an outcome. In short, Council Vice Chairs would still be involved, but in more of an administrative capacity, with community input into the decision-making. I've put this out on the list in advance of our upcoming meeting to give time to think about the idea in advance. Hyderabad planning will be an item on our upcoming agenda, and this could factor into that discussion. Best wishes, Heather

5 5

RrSG GNSO REP Shuo "Sophia" Feng
by Glen de Saint Géry 31 Aug '16

31 Aug '16

FYI from Theo Geurts Registar Stakeholder Group Secretary Sadly enough it turns out that Shuo "Sophia" Feng is not eligible to represent us as a GNSO councillor. Sorry for the extra work, but she needs to be removed from the mailing lists, including the council mailing list. Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org<http://gnso.icann.org/> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>.

1 0

Re: [council] CORRECTION RE: Two Letter gTLD Domains
by James M. Bladel 31 Aug '16

31 Aug '16

Thanks, Phil, noted. If there are no objections, we'll add this as Agenda Item 10.4 under AOB for Thursday's call. Thanks- J. From: <owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org>> on behalf of Phil Corwin <psc(a)vlaw-dc.com<mailto:psc@vlaw-dc.com>> Date: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 at 9:03 To: Phil Corwin <psc(a)vlaw-dc.com<mailto:psc@vlaw-dc.com>>, GNSO Council List <council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: [council] CORRECTION RE: Two Letter gTLD Domains Council Colleagues: It appears that I have incorrectly attributed the authorship of the referenced article to Prof. Mueller, who posts the great majority of blog posts at the website. The author of this particular article is Farzaneh Badii. I apologize for any confusion my misattribution may have caused. Regards, Philip Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal Virtualaw LLC 1155 F Street, NW Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20004 202-559-8597/Direct 202-559-8750/Fax 202-255-6172/Cell Twitter: @VlawDC "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org> [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Phil Corwin Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 7:19 PM To: council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] Two Letter gTLD Domains Council colleagues: Over the weekend Milton Mueller posted a rather provocative blog at http://www.internetgovernance.org/2016/08/26/another-government-land-grab-i… , concerning the just-closed comment period on Proposed Measures for Letter/Letter Two-Character ASCII Labels to Avoid Confusion with Corresponding Country Codes (at https://www.icann.org/public-comments/proposed-measures-two-char-2016-07-08…). It prompted me to review the filed comments, and I noted that the NCSG, IPC, and registry SG all came out against aspects of the staff proposal that concerns Prof. Mueller. While this item is not on our agenda for the September 1st call, I would hope that we can at least begin a preliminary discussion during the concluding AOB section. I would like to better understand the historic context for the current proposal. Beyond the specifics of the proposal, my more general concern is that ICANN may be moving to implement a general policy for gTLDs that originates from ICANN staff rather than a PDP, and that apparently there is not even GAC Consensus Advice to which the proposal is responding. Thanks and best regards, Philip Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal Virtualaw LLC 1155 F Street, NW Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20004 202-559-8597/Direct 202-559-8750/Fax 202-255-6172/Cell Twitter: @VlawDC "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey ________________________________ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com> Version: 2016.0.7752 / Virus Database: 4647/12863 - Release Date: 08/23/16

2 1

Updated Proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting on 1 September 2016 at 12:00 UTC
by Glen de Saint Géry 30 Aug '16

30 Aug '16

Dear Councillors, Please find the updated proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting on 1 September 2016 at 12:00 UTC. This agenda is also published on the Wiki page at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Agenda+1+September+… and on the website at: https://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/agenda-council-01sep16-en.htm Please note that the updates refer to: Item 10: Any Other Business (10 minutes) 10.1 - Discussion of note from Chris Disspain on status of IGO acronyms protection work (https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/disspain-to-gnso-council-22aug16-e…)<https://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/docxwBd6RaeZsW.docx)> 10.2 - Confirmation of Council liaisons to the the Translation & Transliteration of gTLD Contact Data PDP, IRTP-C PDP, IRTP-D PDP and GNSO Review Working Group 10.3 - Timeline for GNSO Chair/Vice-Chair elections leading up to and at ICANN57 to be shared following meeting - Councillors encouraged to share any questions / concerns with mailing list 10.4 Proposed Measures for Letter/Letter Two-Character ASCII Labels to Avoid Confusion with Corresponding Country Code Please note that all documents referenced in the agenda have been gathered on a Wiki page for convenience and easier access: https://community.icann.org/x/MBWsAw This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures,<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-24jun15-en.pdf> approved and updated on 24 June 2015. For convenience: · An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is provided in Appendix 1 at the end of this agenda. · An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the absentee voting procedures is provided in Appendix 2 at the end of this agenda. Coordinated Universal Time: 12:00 UTC http://tinyurl.com/hbwu5tf 05:00 Los Angeles; 08:00 Washington; 13:00 London; 15:00 Istanbul; 22:00 Hobart GNSO Council Meeting Audio Cast To join the event click on the link: http://stream.icann.org:8000/gnso.m3u Councilors should notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if they will not be able to attend and/or need a dial out call. ___________________________________________ Item 1: Administrative matters (5 minutes) 1.1 - Roll call 1.2 - Updates to Statements of Interest 1.3 - Review/amend agenda. 1.4 - Note the status of minutes for the previous Council meetings per the GNSO Operating Procedures: Minutes of the GNSO Council Meeting on 21 July 2016 <https://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/minutes-council-21jul16-en.htm> were approved on 27 August 2016. Item 2: Opening Remarks / Review of Projects & Action List (5 minutes) 2.1 - Review focus areas and provide updates on specific key themes / topics, to include review of Projects List <http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/projects-list.pdf> and Action List<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Action+Items> Item 3: Consent agenda (5 minutes) 3.1 - Confirm dates for selection of GAC-GNSO liaison (motion passed on 30 June 2016) based on updated ICANN57 meeting dates: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+30+June+2016 Motion as passed, with dates to be updated highlighted as indicated below: Resolved: 1. The GNSO Council hereby confirms the extension of the term of the current GNSO Liaison to the GAC, Mason Cole, until the end of the ICANN AGM in Hyderabad. 2. The GNSO Council instructs the GNSO Secretariat to inform the GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies of the extended selection timeline (Nominations Accepted for Candidates - 1 OCT 2016; Council Chairs consider candidates and notify first choice - 20 OCT; Chairs submit motion to Council by 29 OCT (change to 28 October) for consideration during Council meeting on 8 NOV (change to 7 November); GAC Leadership notified of new Liaison by 9 NOV). Item 4: COUNCIL VOTE - Approval of Recommendations from the Standing Committee on GNSO Improvements (10 minutes) In April 2015 the GNSO Council requested that the Standing Committee on GNSO Improvements (SCI) document the existing customary practices of the GNSO Council concerning (i) whether, how and by whom a properly submitted motion before the Council is to be seconded, and (ii) the treatment of proposed amendments to such motions as either "friendly" or "unfriendly". The Council's request also authorized the SCI to develop new processes for these practices if the SCI believed that the current practices are inappropriate. Separately, in November 2015, the GNSO Council requested that the SCI review Sections 2.2(b), (f) and (g) of the GNSO Operating Procedures with respect to, first, clarifying: (i) the eligibility of incoming Council members to run for the position of GNSO Chair; (ii) the start and end dates as well as the duration of the Chair and Vice-Chair terms in accordance with the ICANN Bylaws; and (iii) the timing of publication of the election results; and, secondly, recommending a general time table for election of the GNSO Chair. In October 2015 and in accordance with the Council's April request, the SCI sent its documentation of the Council's practices on the seconding and amendment of motions to the Council (see https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/aikman-scalese-vansnick-to-robinso…). Subsequently, the SCI reached Full Consensus on a proposal to codify the current customary practices in the GNSO Operating Procedures as a new Section 3.3.3: Submitting, Seconding, and Amending Motions. With respect to its review of the rules governing the GNSO Chair and Vice-Chair elections, the SCI reached Full Consensus on modifications to Section 2.2 and a proposal for a new Section 2.2.1: Procedures for a Situation Where a New GNSO Chair Has Not Been Elected by the End of the Previous Chair's Term in the GNSO Operating Procedures. The SCI's proposals were published for public comment on 5 July 2016 (https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-op-procedures-2016-07-05-en). By the close of the public comment period on 14 August, two public comments had been received supporting the SCI's proposals (https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-op-procedures-05jul16/). Here the Council will consider whether or not to approve the SCI's recommendations for modifying the GNSO Operating Procedures as proposed. 4.1 - Presentation of the motion<https://community.icann.org/x/FQObAw> (Amr Elsadr) 4.2 - Discussion 4.3 - Council vote (voting threshold: simple majority) Item 5: COUNCIL VOTE - Adoption of Implementation Advisory Group Recommendations to Update Procedure on WHOIS Conflicts with National Laws (15 minutes) The GNSO's 2005 Policy on WHOIS Conflicts with National Laws (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/whois-privacy/council-rpt-18jan06.htm) had recommended the creation of a procedure to address conflicts between a contracted party's WHOIS obligations and local/national privacy laws or regulations. Under the existing procedure dating from January 2008, a contracted party that credibly demonstrates that it is legally prevented from complying with its WHOIS obligations can invoke the procedure, which defines a credible demonstration as one in which the contracted party has received "notification of an investigation, litigation, regulatory proceeding or other government or civil action that might affect its compliance." The procedure has never been invoked. In May 2014, ICANN launched a review of the procedure. An Implementation Advisory Group (IAG) was formed and began its work in January 2015. The IAG's Initial Report was published for public comment in November 2015 (see https://www.icann.org/public-comments/iag-whois-conflicts-privacy-2015-10-0…). On 25 May 2016, the IAG's Final Report<http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/pdf1nt18yPBer.pdf>, accompanying Appendices<http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/pdfC9Dr9B5OBO.pdf> and a summary Memo to the GNSO Council<http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/pdfZPGKEDdzDq.pdf> was delivered to the GNSO Council. The IAG proposed modifications to the procedure that it believes do not affect the underlying Policy. The Council received an update on the proposed modifications at ICANN56 and discussed the matter further at its meeting on 21 July. Here the Council will confirm whether or not the IAG's proposed modifications conform with the underlying GNSO Policy. 5.1 - Presentation of the motion<https://community.icann.org/x/FQObAw> (James Bladel) 5.2 - Discussion 5.3 - Council vote (voting threshold: simple majority) Item 6: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - ICANN Board Letter on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures (20 minutes) On 5 August 2016, ICANN Board Chair Dr. Steve Crocker sent a letter to the GNSO Council concerning work on the GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures (https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/crocker-to-bladel-05aug16-en.pdf). The Board wished to know the GNSO Council's view of the current work in light of the existing GNSO policy and ongoing parallel review work on the 2012 New gTLD Program. The Board letter specifically asked for information on the PDP timeline and whether the GNSO believes that the current PDP must be completed prior to advancing a new application process under the current policy recommendations, including whether any consideration has been given in relation to whether a future application process could proceed while policy work continues and be iteratively applied to the process for allocating new gTLDs. On 16 August the GNSO Chairs sent a reply to the Board on behalf of the Council, acknowledging the Board's request (https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/council-leadership-to-crocker-16au…). Here the Council will discuss the subject of the Board's letter and its further response, including whether or not input from the PDP Working Group may be helpful. 6.1 - Status update on the Board letter and PDP progress (James Bladel / Paul McGrady) 6.2 - Discussion 6.3 - Next steps Item 7: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Next Steps for the Cross Community Working Group on Internet Governance (10 minutes) The Charter<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/52888213/Charter%20ccWG%20…> for this Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) was ratified<https://community.icann.org/x/oQInAw> by the ccNSO Council (September 2014), the GNSO Council (October 2014), and the ALAC (April 2015). The ratified Charter provides that the CCWG scope includes doing "whatever it deems relevant and necessary to facilitate and ensure engagement and participation of the ICANN community in the global Internet governance scene and multi-stakeholder decision-making processes", with regular monthly updates to be provided to its Chartering Organizations and a periodic Progress Paper where appropriate. The Charter also provides that the Chartering Organizations should review the Charter and CCWG deliverables in order to determine whether the group should continue or be dissolved, with the proviso that the CCWG will continue if at least two of its Chartering Organizations extend the Charter and notify the other Chartering Organizations accordingly. At ICANN55, there was some discussion over the most appropriate forum for SO/AC interaction on Internet governance matters, especially given the expected forthcoming finalization of a Uniform Framework of Principles for Future CCWGs. The co-chairs of the CCWG-IG provided the Council with a Progress Report on its recent activities at ICANN56. Here the Council will discuss appropriate next steps in relation to overseeing the work of the CCWG. 7.1 - Review of status of Council discussion (James Bladel) 7.2 - Discussion 7.3 - Next steps Item 8: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Proposed Cost Control Mechanisms and Request for GNSO Council Validation of the Budget for the Cross Community Working Group on Ensuring ICANN Accountability (CCWG-Accountability) (15 minutes) On 10 July, the GNSO Council requested that the ICANN Board Finance Committee and the CCWG-Accountability co-chairs conduct a webinar to brief the Council and broader GNSO community on the Proposed Cost Control Mechanisms and the CCWG-Accountability's request for the GNSO Council to validate the proposed FY17 budget for the CCWG-Accountability (https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/bladel-to-bfc-ccwg-accountability-…). The proposed budget and costs had been reported to the GNSO Council on 21 June (https://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg18841.html)The requested webinar took place on 23 August. Here the Council will discuss the CCWG-Accountability's request for the Council to validate the proposed FY17 budget in light of the further information provided during the webinar (recording and slides available at: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/p8fu99qpt7d/. 8.1 - Status update (James Bladel) 8.2 - Discussion 8.3 - Next steps Item 9: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Planning and Scheduling for ICANN57 (15 minutes) ICANN57 will take place in Hyderabad, India, from 3-9 November 2016. This will be the first "Meeting C" under the new ICANN Meeting Strategy as well as the Annual General Meeting for ICANN. A draft GNSO schedule<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/meeting-c-schedule-11jul16-en.pdf> for the meeting was circulated to the GNSO Council on 11 July 2016 and reviewed at the Council meeting on 21 July. Here the Council will review all proposed GNSO sessions for ICANN57 in relation to the meeting schedule, including the face to face Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group meetings, the customary annual Development Session for incoming and continuing GNSO Councilors, and the submission of High Interest Topics of interest to the GNSO. 9.1 - Overview of the proposed schedule (James Bladel) 9.2 - Discussion 9.3 - Next steps Item 10: Any Other Business (10 minutes) 10.1 - Discussion of note from Chris Disspain on status of IGO acronyms protection work (https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/disspain-to-gnso-council-22aug16-e…)<https://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/docxwBd6RaeZsW.docx)> 10.2 - Confirmation of Council liaisons to the the Translation & Transliteration of gTLD Contact Data PDP, IRTP-C PDP, IRTP-D PDP and GNSO Review Working Group 10.3 - Timeline for GNSO Chair/Vice-Chair elections leading up to and at ICANN57 to be shared following meeting - Councillors encouraged to share any questions / concerns with mailing list 10.4 Proposed Measures for Letter/Letter Two-Character ASCII Labels to Avoid Confusion with Corresponding Country Code Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X, Section 3) 9. Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, Annex A hereto, or the GNSO Operating Procedures, the default threshold to pass a GNSO Council motion or other voting action requires a simple majority vote of each House. The voting thresholds described below shall apply to the following GNSO actions: a. Create an Issues Report: requires an affirmative vote of more than one-fourth (1/4) vote of each House or majority of one House. b. Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as described in Annex A<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA>): requires an affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than two-thirds (2/3) of one House. c. Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of GNSO Supermajority. d. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than two-thirds (2/3) of one House. e. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority. f. Changes to an Approved PDP Team Charter: For any PDP Team Charter approved under d. or e. above, the GNSO Council may approve an amendment to the Charter through a simple majority vote of each House. g. Terminate a PDP: Once initiated, and prior to the publication of a Final Report, the GNSO Council may terminate a PDP only for significant cause, upon a motion that passes with a GNSO Supermajority Vote in favor of termination. h. Approve a PDP Recommendation Without a GNSO Supermajority: requires an affirmative vote of a majority of each House and further requires that one GNSO Council member representative of at least 3 of the 4 Stakeholder Groups supports the Recommendation. i. Approve a PDP Recommendation With a GNSO Supermajority: requires an affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority, j. Approve a PDP Recommendation Imposing New Obligations on Certain Contracting Parties: where an ICANN contract provision specifies that "a two-thirds vote of the council" demonstrates the presence of a consensus, the GNSO Supermajority vote threshold will have to be met or exceeded. k. Modification of Approved PDP Recommendation: Prior to Final Approval by the ICANN Board, an Approved PDP Recommendation may be modified or amended by the GNSO Council with a GNSO Supermajority vote. l. A "GNSO Supermajority" shall mean: (a) two-thirds (2/3) of the Council members of each House, or (b) three-fourths (3/4) of one House and a majority of the other House." Appendix 2: Absentee Voting Procedures (GNSO Operating Procedures 4.4<http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-operating-procedures-22sep11-en.pdf>) 4.4.1 Applicability Absentee voting is permitted for the following limited number of Council motions or measures. a. Initiate a Policy Development Process (PDP); b. Approve a PDP recommendation; c. Recommend amendments to the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) or ICANN Bylaws; d. Fill a Council position open for election. 4.4.2 Absentee ballots, when permitted, must be submitted within the announced time limit, which shall be 72 hours from the meeting's adjournment. In exceptional circumstances, announced at the time of the vote, the Chair may reduce this time to 24 hours or extend the time to 7 calendar days, provided such amendment is verbally confirmed by all Vice-Chairs present. 4.4.3 The GNSO Secretariat will administer, record, and tabulate absentee votes according to these procedures and will provide reasonable means for transmitting and authenticating absentee ballots, which could include voting by telephone, e- mail, web-based interface, or other technologies as may become available. 4.4.4 Absentee balloting does not affect quorum requirements. (There must be a quorum for the meeting in which the vote is initiated.) Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 12:00 Local time between October and March Winter in the NORTHERN hemisphere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- California, USA (PDT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/na/pst.html>) UTC-7+0DST 05:00 San José, Costa Rica UTC-5+0DST 07:00 Iowa City, USA (CDT<http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTC%E2%88%9206:00>) UTC-5+0DST 07:00 New York/Washington DC, USA (EST) UTC-4+0DST 08:00 Buenos Aires, Argentina (ART<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/sa/art.html>) UTC-3+0DST 09:00 Rio de Janiero, Brazil (BRST) UTC-3+0DST 09:00 London, United Kingdom (BST) UTC+0DST 13:00 Bonn, Germany (CET) UTC+1+0DST 14:00 Cairo, Egypt, (EET) UTC+2+0DST 14:00 Istanbul, Turkey (EEST) UTC+3+0DST 15:00 Perth, Australia (WST<http://timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/au/wst.html>) UTC+8+0DST 20:00 Singapore (SGT) UTC +8 +0DST 20:00 Sydney/Hobart, Australia (AEDT) UTC+11+0DST 22:00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- DST starts/ends on last Sunday of October 2016, 2:00 or 3:00 local time (with exceptions) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com<http://www.timeanddate.com/> http://tinyurl.com/hbwu5tf Glen de Saint Géry Manager Supporting Organisations Advisory Committees Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers - ICANN glen(a)icann.org<mailto:glen@icann.org> http://www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org/> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-…>.

1 0

CORRECTION RE: Two Letter gTLD Domains
by Phil Corwin 30 Aug '16

30 Aug '16

Council Colleagues: It appears that I have incorrectly attributed the authorship of the referenced article to Prof. Mueller, who posts the great majority of blog posts at the website. The author of this particular article is Farzaneh Badii. I apologize for any confusion my misattribution may have caused. Regards, Philip Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal Virtualaw LLC 1155 F Street, NW Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20004 202-559-8597/Direct 202-559-8750/Fax 202-255-6172/Cell Twitter: @VlawDC "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Phil Corwin Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 7:19 PM To: council(a)gnso.icann.org Subject: [council] Two Letter gTLD Domains Council colleagues: Over the weekend Milton Mueller posted a rather provocative blog at http://www.internetgovernance.org/2016/08/26/another-government-land-grab-i… , concerning the just-closed comment period on Proposed Measures for Letter/Letter Two-Character ASCII Labels to Avoid Confusion with Corresponding Country Codes (at https://www.icann.org/public-comments/proposed-measures-two-char-2016-07-08…). It prompted me to review the filed comments, and I noted that the NCSG, IPC, and registry SG all came out against aspects of the staff proposal that concerns Prof. Mueller. While this item is not on our agenda for the September 1st call, I would hope that we can at least begin a preliminary discussion during the concluding AOB section. I would like to better understand the historic context for the current proposal. Beyond the specifics of the proposal, my more general concern is that ICANN may be moving to implement a general policy for gTLDs that originates from ICANN staff rather than a PDP, and that apparently there is not even GAC Consensus Advice to which the proposal is responding. Thanks and best regards, Philip Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal Virtualaw LLC 1155 F Street, NW Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20004 202-559-8597/Direct 202-559-8750/Fax 202-255-6172/Cell Twitter: @VlawDC "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey ________________________________ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com> Version: 2016.0.7752 / Virus Database: 4647/12863 - Release Date: 08/23/16

1 0

Call for Volunteers: GNSO Council Liaisons
by James M. Bladel 30 Aug '16

30 Aug '16

Council Colleagues - With the Jennifer Gore's recent departure from the Council, along with the creation of the Translation & Transliteration IRT, we need to fill several vacant Council liaison roles, specifically: · Translation & Transliteration of gTLD Contact Data PDP IRT · IRTP-C PDP IRT · IRTP-D PDP IRT Note that in relation to these last two, the effective date for implementation of the policy has already been announced (1 DEC 2016) and no further IRT meetings are expected, so this role wouldn't take up too much time. For the T&T IRT, the IRT has recently commenced its deliberations following the adoption of the PDP recommendations by the ICANN Board. Note that under the new IRT Principles & Guidelines (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/irt-principles-guidelines-23aug…<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/irt-principles-guidelines-23aug…)>) , the liaison is expected to relay any concerns or questions from the IRT that need to be addressed by the GNSO Council. Finally, a liaison is requested for the newly created: · GNSO Review Working Group If you are interested in volunteering for any of these liaison roles, please respond on the mailing list. Ideally we would confirm new appointments on our upcoming GNSO Council call on Thursday ( 1 SEP). Thank you- J.

3 3