November 2022 - council - lists.icann.org

Re: [council] [Ext] FW: [gnso-chairs] Update on SubPro ODP and Policy Question Set #6
by Steve Chan 30 Nov '22

30 Nov '22

Dear Councilors, The link to the draft response is below in Jeff’s email forwarded by Anne, but also here for your convenience: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18C6Vulnv6V0Akyq3IeehWuSGg1TAHCYJEBGXHrA… The Word is also attached. Best, Steve From: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman(a)lewisroca.com> Date: Monday, November 28, 2022 at 7:46 AM To: "COUNCIL(a)GNSO.ICANN.ORG" <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Cc: Steve Chan <steve.chan(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] FW: [gnso-chairs] Update on SubPro ODP and Policy Question Set #6 Please see below from Jeff. He says my changes have been incorporated into the Council’s Response to Question Set # 6. STEVE – could you please post the final Google link and a Word doc to the Council list for final “non-objection” approval by Council members? (I understand Leadership will determine the deadline for non-objection.) Thank you, Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel AAikman(a)lewisroca.com<mailto:AAikman@lewisroca.com> D. 520.629.4428 [cid:image002.png@01D90407.6B0879A0] From: Jeff Neuman <jeff(a)jjnsolutions.com> Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 8:16 AM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman(a)lewisroca.com>; Steve Chan <steve.chan(a)icann.org>; Sebastien(a)registry.godaddy; dibiase(a)amazon.com; john.mcelwaine(a)nelsonmullins.com Subject: RE: [gnso-chairs] Update on SubPro ODP and Policy Question Set #6 [EXTERNAL] ________________________________ [Removed the Council as that is beyond my posting privileges as the liaison] Thanks Anne. These have now been incorporated into the draft [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/18C6Vulnv6V0A…>. Council Leadership – How long should we keep this open for comment so that I can submit it to ICANN’s ODP Team? Sincerely, Jeff [cid:image003.png@01D90407.6B0879A0] Jeffrey J. Neuman Founder & CEO JJN Solutions, LLC p: +1.202.549.5079 E: jeff(a)jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com> http://jjnsolutions.com [jjnsolutions.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/jjnsolutions.com__;!!PtGJab4!5iVN_MStgHJ-…> From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman(a)lewisroca.com<mailto:AAikman@lewisroca.com>> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2022 3:08 PM To: Steve Chan <steve.chan(a)icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org>>; Sebastien(a)registry.godaddy<mailto:Sebastien@registry.godaddy>; COUNCIL(a)GNSO.ICANN.ORG<mailto:COUNCIL@GNSO.ICANN.ORG>; gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>; GNSO-Chairs <gnso-chairs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-chairs@icann.org>> Cc: Jeff Neuman <jeff(a)jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com>> Subject: RE: [gnso-chairs] Update on SubPro ODP and Policy Question Set #6 Importance: High Thanks Steve and Jeff, for the drafting and the further explanation. As an active participant on Sub Pro and given that the small team will not be convened for this Council response to Question Set #6, I have some suggested changes for consideration by the full Council which I believe are important procedurally. Those changes are shown in purple in the attached document and pasted again below. I summarize the reasons for the changes here: 1. Council should affirm Org’s stated understanding that if Implementation Guidance must be varied, Org should specify the “valid reasons” (language from the Sub Pro Final Report) and should consult with the IRT regarding appropriate alternatives. 1. The Org’s question regarding Recommendation 17.12 in relation to the Applicant Support program presents a special case due to the initiation of the GNSO Guidance Process on Applicant Support. I think we need to say that in that case, variations to Implementation Guidance should be the subject of consultations with the Applicant Support Guidance Team. 1. In cases where the IRT is not yet formed and no GNSO Guidance Process (or other process outlined in the GNSO Operating Procedures) has been initiated, org should specify the reasons for recommending a variation to the Implementation Guidance and should seek the opinion of Council, e.g. via the procedures applicable to the GNSO Input process. (Presumably the last case could theoretically happen after Board review of the Operational Design Assessment.) I believe the changes below and in the attached draft preserve the appropriate role for Council in connection with Implementation as provided in the PDP Manual and in the GNSO Guidance Process. This will be particularly important in relation to the development of the Applicant Support program as the Guidance Process proceeds. The recommended changes are pasted below and shown in the attached draft. It is good to know (as Steve said yesterday) that there would not be any sort of “hold-up” in the expected date for the org’s delivery of the Operational Design Assessment based on the requested response to Question Set #6. This is an important topic and may require discussion at the Council level in our December meeting. (Thank you, Jeff, for offering to review this in December.) If required, I am noting a formal objection to the initial draft without the suggested changes. (Jeff said this doesn’t go on the Council’s agenda unless a Councilor objects so I am trying to follow the rules.) AEAS Proposed Changes to the Response to Sub Pro ODP Question Set #6 The Council agrees with your understanding that “if something cannot be implemented exactly as specified in Implementation Guidance, the org would be expected to describe its efforts and rationale for such cases, and to work with the IRT to implement an alternative in line with the purpose behind the recommended action”. In relation to the GNSO Initiated Applicant Support Guidance Process that has been launched in response to the question posed by the ODP, the Council believes that alternatives to the specified Implementation Guidance should be addressed in the context of that GNSO Guidance Process and would expect the org to work with the Applicant Support Guidance Team to address any required changes to Implementation Guidance. In short, implementation guidance remains a strong recommendation as opposed to a requirement. As referenced in the Preamble to the Sub Pro Final Report, ICANN should specify any “circumstances where there may be valid reasons not to take such guidance exactly as described…” In such circumstances, Council believes that consultation with the IRT, the Guidance Process Team, or the Council itself (e.g. via a request for GNSO Input) is in order prior to the adoption of alternatives to the specified Implementation Guidance. In all cases, the implementation should be accomplished in a manner that achieves the objectives laid out in the implementation guidance even if the mechanism of implementation differs slightly from that contained in the final report. Thank you, Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel AAikman(a)lewisroca.com<mailto:AAikman@lewisroca.com> D. 520.629.4428 [cid:image002.png@01D90407.6B0879A0] From: Steve Chan <steve.chan(a)icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org>> Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 2:50 PM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman(a)lewisroca.com<mailto:AAikman@lewisroca.com>>; Sebastien(a)registry.godaddy<mailto:Sebastien@registry.godaddy>; COUNCIL(a)GNSO.ICANN.ORG<mailto:COUNCIL@GNSO.ICANN.ORG>; gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>; GNSO-Chairs <gnso-chairs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-chairs@icann.org>> Cc: Jeff Neuman <jeff(a)jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com>> Subject: Re: [gnso-chairs] Update on SubPro ODP and Policy Question Set #6 [EXTERNAL] ________________________________ Hi Anne, I see your response came in before I completed this response. Just noting that I’ve seen it already, but think the response below should still hopefully be helpful. Hi Anne, Let me try and answer your question. The SubPro ODP Team has an understanding of how implementation guidance should be treated, which in their words is, “a strongly recommended action and that if in some circumstances there may be valid reasons not to take such guidance exactly as described, this would remain consistent with the Final Report.” This understanding comes from the Final Report preamble and was reinforced by previous ODP question/answers. There is specific phrasing for a handful of recommendations where the SubPro ODP Team wants to validate that their understanding of implementation guidance, pasted above, still holds true. The reason they are asking is because the recommendation language (i.e., “must”) cites the implementation guidance in the recommendation language itself, potentially creating a relationship requirement between the recommendation and embedded implementation guidance. I’ve highlighted an example of the language that is causing the potential ambiguity, where it can be construed that the implementation guidance in these specific instances, must be fulfilled precisely “as detailed” in order to meet the requirements of the recommendation. * Recommendation 17.12: ICANN org must develop a plan for funding the Applicant Support Program, as detailed in the Implementation Guidelines below. Here is a link to Jeff’s draft responses, where you can see that he validates the SubPro ODP Team understanding of implementation guidance, which holds for these specific recommendations: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18C6Vulnv6V0Akyq3IeehWuSGg1TAHCYJEBGXHrA… [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/18C6Vulnv6V0A…>. As requested, the draft responses are attached in Word. Hopefully this provides a bit of clarity and I certainly welcome Jeff, as well as Councilors, to weigh in. Best, Steve From: Gnso-chairs <gnso-chairs-bounces(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-chairs-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of "Aikman-Scalese, Anne via Gnso-chairs" <gnso-chairs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-chairs@icann.org>> Reply-To: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman(a)lewisroca.com<mailto:AAikman@lewisroca.com>> Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2022 at 9:04 AM To: "Sebastien(a)registry.godaddy<mailto:Sebastien@registry.godaddy>" <Sebastien(a)registry.godaddy<mailto:Sebastien@registry.godaddy>>, "COUNCIL(a)GNSO.ICANN.ORG<mailto:COUNCIL@GNSO.ICANN.ORG>" <council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>>, "gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>" <gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>>, GNSO-Chairs <gnso-chairs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-chairs@icann.org>> Cc: Jeff Neuman <jeff(a)jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com>> Subject: Re: [gnso-chairs] Update on SubPro ODP and Policy Question Set #6 Thanks Sebastien. JEFF – I am a bit confused by the examples presented in Question Set 6 from the Sub Pro ODP team. The examples are all labelled “Recommendation” and all include the word “must” which has a defined meaning in the Sub Pro Final Report. The Implementation Guidance does not generally include the word “must”. That word was used consistently in connection with Recommendations and Question Set 6 appears to be reciting “must” Recommendations but treating them as Implementation Guidance. Could you please clarify the question being asked in Question Set 6? (I have previously volunteered to join that Sub Pro small team.) Thank you, Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel AAikman(a)lewisroca.com<mailto:AAikman@lewisroca.com> D. 520.629.4428 [cid:image005.png@01D90407.6B0879A0] From: council <council-bounces(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council-bounces@gnso.icann.org>> On Behalf Of Sebastien--- via council Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2022 3:10 AM To: COUNCIL(a)GNSO.ICANN.ORG<mailto:COUNCIL@GNSO.ICANN.ORG>; gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>; GNSO-Chairs <gnso-chairs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-chairs@icann.org>> Subject: [council] FW: Update on SubPro ODP and Policy Question Set #6 [EXTERNAL] ________________________________ Dear Council Colleagues, Please find below our Council Liaison to the SubPro ODP’s latest updates. Thank you Jeff for providing these. Please review them ahead of our meeting on 17 November (or 16 depending on time zones). Kindly, Sebastien Ducos GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager [signature_615475152] +33612284445 France & Australia sebastien(a)registry.godaddy<mailto:sebastien@registry.godaddy> From: Jeff Neuman <jeff(a)jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com>> Date: Thursday, 10 November 2022 at 10:30 pm To: john.mcelwaine(a)nelsonmullins.com<mailto:john.mcelwaine@nelsonmullins.com> <john.mcelwaine(a)nelsonmullins.com<mailto:john.mcelwaine@nelsonmullins.com>>, dibiase(a)amazon.com<mailto:dibiase@amazon.com> <dibiase(a)amazon.com<mailto:dibiase@amazon.com>>, Sebastien Ducos <sebastien(a)registry.godaddy<mailto:sebastien@registry.godaddy>> Cc: Steve Chan <steve.chan(a)icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org>>, SubPro ODP Mailman List <subpro-odp(a)icann.org<mailto:subpro-odp@icann.org>> Subject: Update on SubPro ODP and Policy Question Set #6 Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Forward suspicious emails to isitbad@. Dear Council Leadership, Can you please post this on the GNSO Council List? This afternoon I had my November call with the ICANN Org SubPro Team led by Karen Lentz. Here is the latest update: 1. On Schedule. During that call, ICANN org confirmed that they are in fact on schedule to deliver the Operational Design Assessment the week of December 12th. The team met its deadline for “pens down” which was yesterday and the document is undergoing internal review. In addition, they are working on an executive summary. 1. Updated Assumptions. On November 8th, ICANN posted a new Assumptions document (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-assumptions-subsequent-pr… [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?…>) which contains all of the previous assumptions (in grey) as well some new ones (not in grey). 1. GNSO Council Briefing on ODA. The ICANN org ODP team would like to set up a call with the Council the week of December 5th to give the Council a preview of the assessment like they did for the SSAD ODA. They will also go over their expectations on timing, and an input mechanism for feedback on the ODA. Like the SSAD ODA, there will not be a formal public comment period, but there may be opportunities for Q&A and potentially providing our own input to the Board. 1. Community Webinar on ODA. After the ODA is released the week of the 12th, ICANN is planning on conducting a webinar for the community to discuss the assessment. It will be open to anyone interested in the program. 1. Final (?) Question Set. The ICANN SubPro ODP Team has posted an additional question that they would like us to respond to regarding the role of Implementation Guidance where a Recommendation incorporates by reference such Implementation guidance. They have confirmed that the ODA release is not dependent on the timing of our response to Question Set 6 provided that their view in that question is consistent with ours (which I believe is). I have copied the question and am working on a proposed response in the following Google Document. https://docs.google.com/document/d/18C6Vulnv6V0Akyq3IeehWuSGg1TAHCYJEBGXHrA… [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?…> 1. Council SPS Planning. We discussed other activities that will need to occur after the ODA is delivered to the Board including the commencement of two (2) IRPs once the ICANN Board approves the recommendations. The Final Report Recommendations include one IRT for Applicant Support and a second IRT for everything else. We believe it is a good idea to discuss this at the Council SPS in December which involves a discussion of the work in the coming year for the Council. Please let me know if you have any questions or you would like me to go over any of this as AOB during the Council meeting on the 17th. Sincerely, Jeffrey J. Neuman GNSO Liaison to SubPro [cid:image007.png@01D90407.6B0879A0] Jeffrey J. Neuman Founder & CEO JJN Solutions, LLC p: +1.202.549.5079 E: jeff(a)jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com> http://jjnsolutions.com [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?…> From: Michael Karakash <michael.karakash(a)icann.org<mailto:michael.karakash@icann.org>> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2022 2:53 PM To: Jeff Neuman <jeff(a)jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com>>; SubPro ODP Mailman List <subpro-odp(a)icann.org<mailto:subpro-odp@icann.org>> Subject: Policy Question Set #6 Hi Jeff, It was great connecting on today’s call to discuss the latest ODP-related developments. As noted, we recently drafted a new Policy Question Set (#6) focused on the topic of Implementation Guidance that I am attaching to this email. Please don’t hesitate to reach out if you have questions or need any clarification. Thank you! Best, Michael ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

3 3

Re: [council] Motion to Approve GNSO Standing Selection Committee Leadership for 2022-2023
by Terri Agnew 30 Nov '22

30 Nov '22

Hello, We confirm receipt and it will be posted on motions wiki page<https://community.icann.org/x/pQjVD> shortly. Thank you. Kind regards, Terri From: council <council-bounces(a)gnso.icann.org> on behalf of "DiBiase, Gregory via council" <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Reply-To: "DiBiase, Gregory" <dibiase(a)amazon.com> Date: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 at 11:19 AM To: "council(a)gnso.icann.org" <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] Motion to Approve GNSO Standing Selection Committee Leadership for 2022-2023 Dear GNSO Councillors, Attached please find a Motion to Approve GNSO Standing Selection Committee Leadership for 2022-2023. Thanks, Greg

1 0

Motion to Approve GNSO Standing Selection Committee Leadership for 2022-2023
by DiBiase, Gregory 30 Nov '22

30 Nov '22

Dear GNSO Councillors, Attached please find a Motion to Approve GNSO Standing Selection Committee Leadership for 2022-2023. Thanks, Greg

1 0

Call for the GNSO Council Liaison to the Transfer Policy Review PDP
by Sebastien＠registry.godaddy 30 Nov '22

30 Nov '22

Dear Council Members, As discussed our last three Council meetings, we are currently seeking a volunteer for the GNSO Council Liaison to the Transfer Policy Review PDP – Phase 1. Please find below further information on the role. 1. Council Leadership’s preference is a non-CPH councillor volunteer to fill this role because the current representative WG membership includes more CPH members than non-CPH members. 1. Council Leadership’s preference is a volunteer who will not term out in 2023. 1. The liaison does not need to be technically or substantively knowledgeable on the topic of domain name transfers, but it is important for the liaison to familiarize himself/herself with WG dynamics in the event any issues that require escalation to the GNSO Council occur during his/her tenure. 1. Currently, the WG meets twice per week, and the meeting schedule is Tuesdays and Thursdays from 16:00 UTC – 17:30 UTC, with a 30-minute leadership call following these meetings. Following its finalization of its Phase 1(a) final report, the WG will likely revert back to 1 call per week for 90 minutes + one 30-minute leadership call per week. 1. The current plan, while subject to change, is for Phase 1 to finish in Dec 2023 and Phase 2 to finish in Dec 2025. 1. For further information on the role of GNSO Council Liaison to GNSO WGs, please refer to the role description<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/gnso-liai…>. Kindly, Sebastien Ducos GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager [signature_2023480548] +33612284445 France & Australia sebastien(a)registry.godaddy<mailto:sebastien@registry.godaddy>

1 0

Re: [council] [gnso-secs] FW: **ACTION** ALL COUNCILORS** Meeting Invite / GNSO SPS Webinar / Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 20:00 UTC
by Nathalie Peregrine 30 Nov '22

30 Nov '22

Thanks Sebastien for this. Jeff – I’ve checked your posting rights to the Council mailing list, and nothing has changed, you should still be able to post there as usual. Where councilors are sometimes unable to post freely is the gnso-chairs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-chairs@icann.org> mailing list. If you are running into issues with the Council mailing list, please let gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> know. Thank you! Nathalie From: Gnso-secs <gnso-secs-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of "gnso-secs(a)icann.org" <gnso-secs(a)icann.org> Reply to: "Sebastien(a)registry.godaddy" <Sebastien(a)registry.godaddy> Date: Wednesday, 30 November 2022 at 11:53 To: "council(a)gnso.icann.org" <council(a)gnso.icann.org>, Jeff Neuman <jeff(a)jjnsolutions.com>, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman(a)lewisroca.com> Cc: "gnso-secs(a)icann.org" <gnso-secs(a)icann.org>, "gnso-chairs(a)icann.org" <gnso-chairs(a)icann.org> Subject: [gnso-secs] FW: **ACTION** ALL COUNCILORS** Meeting Invite / GNSO SPS Webinar / Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 20:00 UTC Thank you Jeff for these examples. Reposting for Council as Jeff is not able to post to the list. Kindly, Sebastien Ducos GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager [signature_983119350] +33612284445 France & Australia sebastien(a)registry.godaddy<mailto:sebastien@registry.godaddy> From: Jeff Neuman <jeff(a)jjnsolutions.com> Date: Monday, 28 November 2022 at 11:48 pm To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman(a)lewisroca.com>, Julie Bisland <julie.bisland(a)icann.org>, Sebastien Ducos <Sebastien(a)registry.godaddy>, dibiase(a)amazon.com <dibiase(a)amazon.com>, john.mcelwaine(a)nelsonmullins.com <john.mcelwaine(a)nelsonmullins.com> Subject: RE: **ACTION** ALL COUNCILORS** Meeting Invite / GNSO SPS Webinar / Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 20:00 UTC Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Forward suspicious emails to isitbad@. [Removed Council because of permissions] Anne, The UDRP is an example of a Consensus Policy that takes into account the Registration AND USE of a domain name and falls within the picket fence. Another example is the Registration Restrictions Dispute Resolution Policy (RRDRP) that some registries with restrictions use. So although regulating content is not within ICANN’s mission, there are certain dispute policies that take content into consideration. I hope that helps. [cid:image002.png@01D904B8.AABBACA0] Jeffrey J. Neuman Founder & CEO JJN Solutions, LLC p: +1.202.549.5079 E: jeff(a)jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com> http://jjnsolutions.com [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?…> From: gnso-council-sps <gnso-council-sps-bounces(a)icann.org> On Behalf Of Aikman-Scalese, Anne via gnso-council-sps Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 1:17 PM To: Julie Bisland <julie.bisland(a)icann.org>; gnso-council-sps(a)icann.org; Sebastien(a)registry.godaddy Cc: gnso-secs(a)icann.org Subject: Re: [GNSO-council-SPS] **ACTION** ALL COUNCILORS** Meeting Invite / GNSO SPS Webinar / Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 20:00 UTC Hello All, Just following up after the webinar on the SPS regarding the questions I posed below. Perhaps Sebastien or John or Greg could respond? Thank you! Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel AAikman(a)lewisroca.com<mailto:AAikman@lewisroca.com> D. 520.629.4428 [cid:image004.png@01D904B8.AABBACA0] From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 9:20 AM To: 'Julie Bisland' <julie.bisland(a)icann.org<mailto:julie.bisland@icann.org>>; gnso-council-sps(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-council-sps@icann.org> Cc: gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> Subject: RE: **ACTION** ALL COUNCILORS** Meeting Invite / GNSO SPS Webinar / Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 20:00 UTC Many thanks Julie. To Leadership and Staff: As a new Councilor, I have a couple of specific questions regarding these materials and the SPS agenda; 1. Given that a prioritization exercise has occurred and that the ICANN Board has authorized additional funds (about $5M I think) for addressing 45 priority projects and given that addressing priority work and getting it moved along was an emphasis in the 2021 SPS meeting, does the agenda for the upcoming SPS meeting in December include time to review the priority project list and discuss GNSO Council role in moving that list along? 1. Regarding the “Picket Fence” slides, one illustration of “What’s Inside” includes the following phrase: (v) dispute resolution policies that take into account the use of a domain name However, the post-transition ByLaws amendments Annex summary states the following and I am trying to understand the meaning of these two phrases in conjunction with one another. • resolution of disputes regarding the registration of domain names (as opposed to the use of such domain names); Thank you, Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel AAikman(a)lewisroca.com<mailto:AAikman@lewisroca.com> D. 520.629.4428 [cid:image004.png@01D904B8.AABBACA0] From: gnso-council-sps <gnso-council-sps-bounces(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-council-sps-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Julie Bisland via gnso-council-sps Sent: Monday, November 21, 2022 8:16 AM To: gnso-council-sps(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-council-sps@icann.org> Cc: gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> Subject: [GNSO-council-SPS] **ACTION** ALL COUNCILORS** Meeting Invite / GNSO SPS Webinar / Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 20:00 UTC [EXTERNAL] ________________________________ Dear all, In preparation for the SPS Webinar, please review the google drive [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?…> required reading materials. I have included links below and attachments for convenience. In addition, here is the SPS agenda [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?…>. GNSO ICANN Bylaws [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?…> Picket Fence Presentation [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?…> Operating Procedures [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?…> WG Guidelines [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?…> GNSO Handbook [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?…> SPS Meeting Report [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?…> Attachments: Annex A: GNSO Policy Development Process What are the Empowered Community Powers? GNSO Council Liaison to WGs EC Overview & Procedures ****************************** Dear all, Please join the GNSO Council Strategic Planning Session webinar on Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 20:00 UTC for 90 minutes. Join Zoom Meeting: https://icann.zoom.us/j/95528642704?pwd=Nmk3M0QxbGxGdUUxTE11K29ja1dhZz09 [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?…> Meeting ID: 955 2864 2704 Passcode: SPS2022!@% One tap mobile +13126266799,,95528642704#,,,,*7050506920# US (Chicago) +13017158592,,95528642704#,,,,*7050506920# US (Washington DC) Meeting ID: 955 2864 2704 Passcode: 7050506920 Find your local number: https://icann.zoom.us/u/abiz6m5aD9 [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?…> For other time zones: https://tinyurl.com/mtkuak8w [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?…> Thank you. Kind regards, Julie -- Julie Bisland Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator (GNSO) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype ID: 79613b691cb8a6c1 Find out more about the GNSO by visiting: https://learn.icann.org/ [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?…> Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?…> Transcripts and recordings of GNSO Working Group and Council events are located on the GNSO Master Calendar [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?…> ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

1 0

FW: **ACTION** ALL COUNCILORS** Meeting Invite / GNSO SPS Webinar / Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 20:00 UTC
by Sebastien＠registry.godaddy 30 Nov '22

30 Nov '22

Thank you Jeff for these examples. Reposting for Council as Jeff is not able to post to the list. Kindly, Sebastien Ducos GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager [signature_983119350] +33612284445 France & Australia sebastien(a)registry.godaddy<mailto:sebastien@registry.godaddy> From: Jeff Neuman <jeff(a)jjnsolutions.com> Date: Monday, 28 November 2022 at 11:48 pm To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman(a)lewisroca.com>, Julie Bisland <julie.bisland(a)icann.org>, Sebastien Ducos <Sebastien(a)registry.godaddy>, dibiase(a)amazon.com <dibiase(a)amazon.com>, john.mcelwaine(a)nelsonmullins.com <john.mcelwaine(a)nelsonmullins.com> Subject: RE: **ACTION** ALL COUNCILORS** Meeting Invite / GNSO SPS Webinar / Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 20:00 UTC Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Forward suspicious emails to isitbad@. [Removed Council because of permissions] Anne, The UDRP is an example of a Consensus Policy that takes into account the Registration AND USE of a domain name and falls within the picket fence. Another example is the Registration Restrictions Dispute Resolution Policy (RRDRP) that some registries with restrictions use. So although regulating content is not within ICANN’s mission, there are certain dispute policies that take content into consideration. I hope that helps. [cid:image003.png@01D90351.6C128E50] Jeffrey J. Neuman Founder & CEO JJN Solutions, LLC p: +1.202.549.5079 E: jeff(a)jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com> http://jjnsolutions.com<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fjjnsolutio…> From: gnso-council-sps <gnso-council-sps-bounces(a)icann.org> On Behalf Of Aikman-Scalese, Anne via gnso-council-sps Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 1:17 PM To: Julie Bisland <julie.bisland(a)icann.org>; gnso-council-sps(a)icann.org; Sebastien(a)registry.godaddy Cc: gnso-secs(a)icann.org Subject: Re: [GNSO-council-SPS] **ACTION** ALL COUNCILORS** Meeting Invite / GNSO SPS Webinar / Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 20:00 UTC Hello All, Just following up after the webinar on the SPS regarding the questions I posed below. Perhaps Sebastien or John or Greg could respond? Thank you! Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel AAikman(a)lewisroca.com<mailto:AAikman@lewisroca.com> D. 520.629.4428 [cid:image005.png@01D90351.6C128E50] From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 9:20 AM To: 'Julie Bisland' <julie.bisland(a)icann.org<mailto:julie.bisland@icann.org>>; gnso-council-sps(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-council-sps@icann.org> Cc: gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> Subject: RE: **ACTION** ALL COUNCILORS** Meeting Invite / GNSO SPS Webinar / Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 20:00 UTC Many thanks Julie. To Leadership and Staff: As a new Councilor, I have a couple of specific questions regarding these materials and the SPS agenda; 1. Given that a prioritization exercise has occurred and that the ICANN Board has authorized additional funds (about $5M I think) for addressing 45 priority projects and given that addressing priority work and getting it moved along was an emphasis in the 2021 SPS meeting, does the agenda for the upcoming SPS meeting in December include time to review the priority project list and discuss GNSO Council role in moving that list along? 1. Regarding the “Picket Fence” slides, one illustration of “What’s Inside” includes the following phrase: (v) dispute resolution policies that take into account the use of a domain name However, the post-transition ByLaws amendments Annex summary states the following and I am trying to understand the meaning of these two phrases in conjunction with one another. • resolution of disputes regarding the registration of domain names (as opposed to the use of such domain names); Thank you, Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel AAikman(a)lewisroca.com<mailto:AAikman@lewisroca.com> D. 520.629.4428 [cid:image005.png@01D90351.6C128E50] From: gnso-council-sps <gnso-council-sps-bounces(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-council-sps-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Julie Bisland via gnso-council-sps Sent: Monday, November 21, 2022 8:16 AM To: gnso-council-sps(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-council-sps@icann.org> Cc: gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> Subject: [GNSO-council-SPS] **ACTION** ALL COUNCILORS** Meeting Invite / GNSO SPS Webinar / Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 20:00 UTC [EXTERNAL] ________________________________ Dear all, In preparation for the SPS Webinar, please review the google drive<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdrive.goo…> required reading materials. I have included links below and attachments for convenience. In addition, here is the SPS agenda<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgnso.ican…>. GNSO ICANN Bylaws<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icann…> Picket Fence Presentation<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgnso.ican…> Operating Procedures<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgnso.ican…> WG Guidelines<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgnso.ican…> GNSO Handbook<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgnso.ican…> SPS Meeting Report<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgnso.ican…> Attachments: Annex A: GNSO Policy Development Process What are the Empowered Community Powers? GNSO Council Liaison to WGs EC Overview & Procedures ****************************** Dear all, Please join the GNSO Council Strategic Planning Session webinar on Tuesday, 22 November 2022 at 20:00 UTC for 90 minutes. Join Zoom Meeting: https://icann.zoom.us/j/95528642704?pwd=Nmk3M0QxbGxGdUUxTE11K29ja1dhZz09<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefens…> Meeting ID: 955 2864 2704 Passcode: SPS2022!@% One tap mobile +13126266799,,95528642704#,,,,*7050506920# US (Chicago) +13017158592,,95528642704#,,,,*7050506920# US (Washington DC) Meeting ID: 955 2864 2704 Passcode: 7050506920 Find your local number: https://icann.zoom.us/u/abiz6m5aD9 <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefens…> For other time zones: https://tinyurl.com/mtkuak8w <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefens…> Thank you. Kind regards, Julie -- Julie Bisland Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator (GNSO) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype ID: 79613b691cb8a6c1 Find out more about the GNSO by visiting: https://learn.icann.org/<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefens…> Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefens…> Transcripts and recordings of GNSO Working Group and Council events are located on the GNSO Master Calendar <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefens…> ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

1 0

Fellowship - Mentor and Selection Committee - EOIs
by Sebastien＠registry.godaddy 30 Nov '22

30 Nov '22

Dear Council Members, Our informal call for interest for the positions of Fellowship Mentor and Fellowship Selection Committee has raised interest within the GNSO. We have consequently decided that we will formally launch an EOI and inform the SSC of the assignment to make a selection. The Mentor position has been the subject of a number of EOIs in the past, for which we do have documents available – please find them attached. The Selection Committee position hasn’t and we are now finalizing the corresponding documents which I will share as soon as possible. Do note that these EOIs are opened to the GNSO in general (not just Council) and we will engage with the different constituencies directly. Kindly, Sebastien Ducos GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager [signature_1764163612] +33612284445 France & Australia sebastien(a)registry.godaddy<mailto:sebastien@registry.godaddy>

1 1

Document and Motion deadline | Monday 05 December 2022 at 23:59 UTC for GNSO Council Meeting 15 December 2022 at 21:00 UTC
by Nathalie Peregrine 28 Nov '22

28 Nov '22

Dear all, Reports, motions and documents for consideration are due no later than (NLT) 10 days in advance (i.e. Monday, 05 December 2022 at 23:59 UTC) of the GNSO Council Meeting on Thursday, 15 December 2022 at 21:00 UTC. Motions should be sent to the Council mailing list by a councilor and will then be posted on the Wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/pQjVD Thank you. Nathalie

1 0

FW: [gnso-secs] 2023 BC Officer Election results
by Julie Bisland 28 Nov '22

28 Nov '22

Dear all, We are delighted to share the results of the BC 2023 officer elections! Please see email below for details. Thank you! Kind regards, Julie From: Gnso-secs <gnso-secs-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Brenda Brewer via Gnso-secs <gnso-secs(a)icann.org> Reply-To: Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer(a)icann.org> Date: Monday, November 28, 2022 at 10:39 AM To: "gnso-secs(a)icann.org" <gnso-secs(a)icann.org> Cc: Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer(a)icann.org> Subject: [gnso-secs] 2023 BC Officer Election results Dear GNSO Secretariats, The 2023 BC Officer election results are announced today, 28 November 2022. All officers were reelected to another one-year term which begins on 1 January 2023. Thank you. * BC Chair: Mason Cole * BC Vice-Chair of Finance and Operations: Lawrence Olawale-Roberts * BC Vice-Chair of Policy Coordination: Steve DelBianco * CSG Representative: Tim Smith Kind regards, Brenda -- Brenda Brewer Policy Operations Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

1 0

FW: [Ext] Public Comment: Initial Report on the Second CSC Effectiveness Review Closing soon!
by Julie Bisland 28 Nov '22

28 Nov '22

FYI-- From: ICANN Community Digest <david.olive(a)icann.org> Reply-To: "policyinfo(a)icann.org" <policyinfo(a)icann.org> Date: Monday, November 28, 2022 at 10:01 AM To: Julie Bisland <julie.bisland(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Public Comment: Initial Report on the Second CSC Effectiveness Review Closing soon! [https://r20.rs6.net/on.jsp?ca=a7d84e98-662a-452b-9e3e-64c8ee0cb65d&a=112202…] Monday, 28 November 2022 ICANN Community Digest [https://files.constantcontact.com/304b3fd3501/31f30ab5-1445-45c3-aef7-c0ea4…] The ICANN org Policy Development Support function publishes this twice-weekly digest to help ICANN community leaders track requests and follow updates. How Domain Name System Policy is Developed, and How You Can Get Involved [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…> Table of Contents Information Sharing · REMINDER: Register for the ICANN Grant Program Implementation Update Webinar · REMINDER: ICANN Launches Fiscal Year 2024 Additional Budget Request Process · REMINDER: ICANN Hosts Community Webinar on New gTLD SubPro ODA · REMINDER: Register to attend ICANN's Draft ICANN FY24 Plans Informational Webinar · REMINDER: ICANN Restarts the Community Regional Outreach Program for FY23 · REMINDER: Call for SOs/ACs to Nominate Fellowship Program Mentors and Selection Committee Members · REMINDER: ICANN77 Fellowship Application Round Now Open Public Comment · LAST CALL: Initial Report on the Second CSC Effectiveness Review · Registration Data Consensus Policy for gTLDs Information Sharing REMINDER: Register for the ICANN Grant Program Implementation Update Webinar The Grant Program will distribute the proceeds from auctions of last resort in the 2012 New Generic Top-Level Domain Program. Once launched, the program will be open to applications from any eligible organization across the world for projects that are supportive of ICANN's mission. The webinar will take place on 1 December 2022 at 15:00 UTC. Please click on this link [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…> to attend the webinar. This webinar will be recorded and made available on the community workspace [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…>. Read more. [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…> REMINDER: ICANN Launches Fiscal Year 2024 Additional Budget Request Process The ABR Process reflects potential ICANN community activities that are not already included in the annual ICANN operating plan and budget. The ABR process helps the ICANN Board and ICANN organization (org) better understand and develop resources for present and future ICANN community needs. More information about the FY24 ABR Process can be found on this workspace [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…>. ICANN org will host an informational webinar on Thursday, 08 December 2022, at 16:00 UTC. Please register [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…>. Read more. [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…> REMINDER: ICANN Hosts Community Webinar on New gTLD SubPro ODA ICANN will host a community webinar on the Operational Design Assessment (ODA) for the New Generic Top-Level Domain (gTLD) Subsequent Procedures (SubPro) Final Report. The event will take place on Wednesday, 14 December 2022 at 13:00–15:00 and 20:00–22:00 UTC. For those interested in joining the webinar on Wednesday, 14 December 2022 (13:00–15:00 UTC and 20:00–22:00 UTC), please be sure to register in advance for either session, by following this registration link [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…>. Read more. [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…> REMINDER: Register to attend ICANN's Draft ICANN FY24 Plans Informational Webinar The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) invites the ICANN community to participate in an informational webinar about the Draft FY24-28 Operating and Financial Plan, and Draft FY24 Operating Plan and Budget. Both webinars will present identical information. · 15 December 2022 at 01:00 UTC Register [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…> · 15 December 2022 at 16:00 UTC Register [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…> Read More. [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…> REMINDER: ICANN Restarts the Community Regional Outreach Program for FY23 ICANN organization is restarting the Community Regional Outreach Program (CROP). The Fiscal Year 2023 (FY23) CROP space [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…> is now available for use by eligible community groups. FY23 CROP trips will be available starting Monday, 16 January 2023. Read more. [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…> REMINDER: Call for SOs/ACs to Nominate Fellowship Program Mentors and Selection Committee Members Supporting Organizations (SOs) and Advisory Committees (ACs) are invited to nominate volunteers to serve as mentors in its Fellowship Program and to serve on the Fellowship Program Selection Committee. There will be a total of seven mentors and seven Selection Committee members, and each group is welcome to nominate one individual for each role. Interested SOs/ACs should select their respective Fellowship Program mentor and Selection Committee representative by 31 January 2023 and notify fellowshipconsultation(a)icann.org<mailto:fellowshipconsultation@icann.org>. Individual self-nominations will not be considered. REMINDER: ICANN77 Fellowship Application Round Now Open ICANN is opening the application round for the ICANN Fellowship Program for the ICANN77 Policy Forum. This round is open only to those who have previously completed an ICANN fellowship. The ICANN77 Policy Forum is scheduled for 12–15 June 2023 in Washington, D.C. If ICANN77 is held virtually, the Fellowship Program will also be held virtually. The deadline to apply is 15 December 2022, 23:59 UTC. Successful candidates will be announced on 17 February 2023 on the ICANN website [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…>. Read more. [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…> Public Comment LAST CALL: Initial Report on the Second CSC Effectiveness Review [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…> Open for submissions date: 14 September 2022 Closed for submissions date: 01 December 2022 Registration Data Consensus Policy for gTLDs [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…> Open for submissions date: 24 August 2022 Closed for submissions date: 05 December 2022 See upcoming proceedings [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…>. See other public consultations [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…>. Volume 4, Issue 87 | Archive [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…> | Next Issue: Thursday, 01 December 2022 STAY INFORMED: Subscribe here [r20.rs6.net]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0017Qq4EXT3wL68mypF…>

1 0