September 2006 - council - lists.icann.org

RE: [council] LSE report
by Ute Decker 20 Sep '06

20 Sep '06

Philip, thanks. I agree, separate calls will take place in any event, and one or two calls open to the entire group will be good to have. -----Original Message----- From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard Sent: 20 September 2006 11:54 To: 'Council GNSO' Subject: [council] LSE report In light of the offers from the LSE to discuss the report with Council and Constituencies it would seem a practical idea if we could ask Glen to arrange maybe one or two calls centrally (at times to suit different time zones) which would be open to all interested Council and Constituency members. There is only a certain value in further discussion with the authors of a final report. (This option would not preclude any enthusiastic constituency having its own call of course!). Philip

1 0

ICANN Opens Public Comment Period on the Tralliance Proposed New Registry Service
by GNSO.SECRETARIAT＠GNSO.ICANN.ORG 19 Sep '06

19 Sep '06

[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org] [To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org] ICANN Opens Public Comment Period on the Tralliance Proposed New Registry Service http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-1-18sep06.htm On 13 September 2006, ICANN posted for public information a proposal http://www.icann.org/registries/rsep/tralliance_request.pdf submitted through the Registry Request Service by Tralliance Corporation for a new service known as "search.travel". ICANN has made a preliminary determination that the Tralliance proposal requires further consideration by the Registry Services Technical Evaluation Panel (RSTEP) because the proposal could raise significant Security and Stability issues. Accordingly, today ICANN has referred the proposal to the RSTEP. Under the terms of the Registry Services Evaluation Policy, http://www.icann.org/registries/rsep/rsep.html the RSTEP shall have 45 calendar days from the referral, until 2 November 2006, to prepare a written report regarding the proposed Registry Service's effect on Security or Stability, which report (along with a summary of any public comments) shall be forwarded to the ICANN Board. The report shall set forward the opinions of the Registry Services Technical Evaluation Panel, including, but not limited to, a detailed statement of the analysis, reasons, and information upon which the panel has relied in reaching their conclusions, along with the response to any specific questions that were included in the referral from ICANN staff. A public comment period will remain open until 5:00 PM PDT/California, 18 October 2006. Public comments will be available for consideration by the RSTEP and the ICANN Board. Comments can be posted to: tralliance-comments(a)icann.org. Comments can be viewed at: http://forum.icann.org/lists/tralliance-comments. -- Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat - ICANN gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

FYI: GNSO Operating Plan, September - December 2006
by Maria Farrell 19 Sep '06

19 Sep '06

Dear all, Please find attached the current draft of the GNSO's operating plan. It has been revised and updated to include current activities and timelines, but if you have any queries about it, please let me know by email. Best regards, Maria

1 0

RE: [council] Regarding terms of Council members
by Ute Decker 18 Sep '06

18 Sep '06

As most of you remember, I was elected at the end of 2005 for a two year term. According to the IPC bylaws I could serve two terms. I am actutely aware of the complexity of the issues and the time needed to get sufficiently up to speed to play an active role, despite the excellent support from ICANN staff. I certainly see the benefit of having councillors on board who have completeted their first term and see no downside in councillors serving multiple terms, provided they present the positions of their constituency based on appropriate consultation. Ute -----Original Message----- From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Keller Sent: 18 September 2006 10:17 To: Bruce Tonkin Cc: Council GNSO Subject: Re: [council] Regarding terms of Council members Hello all, to follow the lead of our chair. I was appointed to the GNSO Council in 2003 as a substitute for Philip Grabensee. I was elected for another term in 2004. This term ends in 2006. Due to our constituency bylaws I'm able to serve two consecutive terms. Since there is no specification in the registrar constituency bylaws and the ICANN bylaws state that not full served terms are not to be counted as terms I would be eligible for another term. In general I want to note that I do not really have any hard feelings either into the direction of restricting the number of terms nor into leaving it totally open. The two points I think that are very important under both options are a. it is the same for all constituencies b. The modus and its outcome is transparent. Best, tom Am 18.09.2006 schrieb Bruce Tonkin: > > Hello Avri, > > When considering terms, there is also the question of whether you take > into account the previous DNSO structure. The archives are available > at: > > http://www.dnso.org > > > > > > Note on my personal opinions on the the issue: > > I am not in general in favor of strict term limits, but i am > > in favor of transparency that allows all to know how long > > someone has been in place. > > > That is a good idea. > > For reference - I joined the DNSO Names Council in Jan 2002. > > I was elected chair of the DNSO Names Council on 29 August 2002. > > Philip Sheppard, Marilyn Cade, Greg Ruth, Tony Harris, Tony Holmes, Ken > Stubbs, and Cary Karp were all on the Council at that time. E.g see the > minutes at: > > http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20020829.NCteleconf-minutes.html > > I have been a member and chair of the GNSO Council since it was formed > in 2003. > > So I guess I have been the chair for the past 4 years. > > Under the registrar constituency rules, I am serving my last term on the > Council as a representative of the registrars constituency. My term > finishes at the AGM in 2007. > > Regards, > Bruce Tonkin > > > Gruss, tom (__) (OO)_____ (oo) /|\ A cow is not entirely full of | |--/ | * milk some of it is hamburger! w w w w

5 4

CANCELLED: LSE Review discussion Friday 21 September 2006
by GNSO.SECRETARIAT＠GNSO.ICANN.ORG 18 Sep '06

18 Sep '06

Dear Council Members, There will be no call on Friday 21 September to discuss the LSE Report on the GNSO Constituencies. I will come back to you with an alternate date within the next day. Please forgive the inconvenience. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen -- Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat - ICANN gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

2 1

Regarding terms of Council members
by Bruce Tonkin 18 Sep '06

18 Sep '06

Hello Avri, When considering terms, there is also the question of whether you take into account the previous DNSO structure. The archives are available at: http://www.dnso.org > > Note on my personal opinions on the the issue: > I am not in general in favor of strict term limits, but i am > in favor of transparency that allows all to know how long > someone has been in place. That is a good idea. For reference - I joined the DNSO Names Council in Jan 2002. I was elected chair of the DNSO Names Council on 29 August 2002. Philip Sheppard, Marilyn Cade, Greg Ruth, Tony Harris, Tony Holmes, Ken Stubbs, and Cary Karp were all on the Council at that time. E.g see the minutes at: http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20020829.NCteleconf-minutes.html I have been a member and chair of the GNSO Council since it was formed in 2003. So I guess I have been the chair for the past 4 years. Under the registrar constituency rules, I am serving my last term on the Council as a representative of the registrars constituency. My term finishes at the AGM in 2007. Regards, Bruce Tonkin

2 1

a question that comes from reading the LSE report:
by Avri Doria 16 Sep '06

16 Sep '06

Hi, In recommendation 13 of the report, (for those who have not seen it yet : http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-15sep06.htm ) they recommend term limits of 2@2 year or 1@3 year. I never gave any thought to how long people had been in the council and was wondering if a list of councilors with their years in the council could be generated. I am curious as to how many councilors this would affect if it were the practice. I looked for such a table in the Annex, and while I may have missed it, did not see one. Might even be interesting to include that information in the council members list at http://gnso.icann.org/council/members.shtml . Note on my personal opinions on the the issue: I am not in general in favor of strict term limits, but i am in favor of transparency that allows all to know how long someone has been in place. In terms of renewals I tend to prefer guidelines that. e.g. say - after 1 term - renew unless there is a reason not to - after 2 terms - renew if there is a good reason to do so - after 3 terms - do not renew unless it is vitally important to do so thanks a.

2 1

LSE GNSO report annexes
by Denise Michel 16 Sep '06

16 Sep '06

Attached is the LSE GNSO report "annexes," per my previous email. Regards, Denise Denise Michel Vice President, Policy Development ICANN denise.michel(a)icann.org +1-408-429-3072 mobile

1 0

LSE GNSO Review
by Denise Michel 16 Sep '06

16 Sep '06

Attached is the main report from the LSE, per my previous email. Denise Denise Michel Vice President, Policy Development ICANN denise.michel(a)icann.org +1-408-429-3072 mobile

1 0

LSE Report
by GNSO Secretariat 15 Sep '06

15 Sep '06

Dear All, There will be a Council meeting on. Friday 22 September at 12.00 UTC to discuss thé LSE Report. Thé dial in number will be sent individually to each councillor. Thank you. Kind regards. Glen -------------------------- Envoyé grâce à la solution mobile BlackBerry de SFR

1 0