July 2005 - council - lists.icann.org

Policy on New gTLD Introductions
by Ross Rader July 12, 2005

July 12, 2005

I've have not done a comprehensive review of the past 6 years, so I can't say whether or not this are the only relevant policies. http://www.icann.org/minutes/minutes-16jul00.htm -rwr

1 0

White paper on new gTLDs
by philip.sheppard＠aim.be July 12, 2005

July 12, 2005

Please find attached the white paper on new TLDs from the BC IPC and ISPCP.

3 2

Registrar Constituency Statement on .net Contract [Fwd: Written copy of the statement]
by Ross Rader July 12, 2005

July 12, 2005

Bhavin has provided me with a copy of his presentation to the Council at the Public Forum this afternoon. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Written copy of the statement Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:41:00 +0200 From: Bhavin Turakhia <bhavin.t(a)directi.com> To: 'Ross Rader' <ross(a)tucows.com> There was extreme displeasure expressed by all registrars with regards to changes in the .net contract without following due process. The Registrars have drafted a statement to the icann board - which has been unanimously agreed upon by ALL the registrars that attended the Registrars Constituency meeting "Registrars trusted the ICANN Board and ICANN staff to act on behalf of the ICANN community in negotiating a new contract with Verisign for .net. Registrars consider there to be a breach of trust by the ICANN Board and the ICANN staff in approving a contract with Verisign regarding .net that contains significant changes from the draft .net agreement posted on the ICANN website, without ANY public consultation. We consider this not only a breach of trust but a breach of the transparency provision (Article III - specifically Section 6) of the ICANN bylaws that states that ICANN shall operate in an open and transparent manner and consistent with procedures designed to ensure fairness, specifically that ICANN would have a public comment period incase of changes that significantly effect 3rd parties and/or involve any imposition or changes to pricing. This is not the first time this has happened. When the new transfers policy was implemented, Verisign negotiated a change in the registry-registrar agreement with the ICANN staff, which was approved by the ICANN Board, to accommodate the transfers policy that contained changes beyond purely for the purposes of the transfers policy without any public consultation with any party including parties that were significantly impacted by that change. ICANN staff gave an undertaking to registrars that this would not happen again. It is the registrars view that this verbal undertaking was also breached. The changes to the .net agreement that specifically concern registrars are: - the maximum price ($4.25 including the ICANN registry fee) put forward by Verisign in the .net application only applies for the first 18 months of the new agreement. After that Verisign is free is set any price. Registrars want the maximum price fixed for the duration of the entire agreement. - Verisign is excluded from new consensus policies that relate to the introduction of new registry services other than what is in the new .net agreement. Registrars want Verisign to continue to be subject to consensus policies in this area. - ICANN may not change the above terms in a renewal of the agreement. Registrars want ICANN to have the ability to negotiate a lower maximum price at the time of contract renewal. We therefore wish for * a reconsideration of the .net contract as per the process that should have been followed * assurances that due process will be followed in similar circusmtances in the future * specific assurances that there is no way something similar would occur in the dotCom contract Registrars present at luxembourg who have all agreed to this statement ====================================================================== ascio anytimesites ausregistry tucows enom bulkregister core deusthce directi domainbank domainsonly apag godaddy wildwest bluerazor iholdings melbourne it name intelligence name.com namebay network solutions namesecure srsplus register.com solis domainclip tuonome dotster markmonitor gmo nominalia stargate schlund

1 0

Statements from other constituencies
by Bruce Tonkin July 12, 2005

July 12, 2005

Hello All, Please arrange for copies of notes or slides on the constituency meetings to be sent to the Council mailing list. Thanks, Bruce Tonkin

1 0

Registrars Statement regarding .net
by Bruce Tonkin July 12, 2005

July 12, 2005

Hello All, The following statement was approved by a large number of registrars today, and presented on their behalf by the chair of the Registrars Constituency: Bhavin Turakhia, from Directi. It was not a formal statement from the "Registrars Constituency" as this requires a formal voting process that takes several weeks. Regards, Bruce "Registrars trusted the ICANN Board and ICANN staff to act on behalf of the ICANN community in negotiating a new contract with Verisign for .net. Registrars consider there to be a breach of trust by the ICANN Board and the ICANN staff in approving a contract with Verisign regarding .net that contains significant changes from the draft .net agreement posted on the ICANN website, without public consultation. We believe this is a breach of the intent of the transparency provision (Article III) of the ICANN bylaws that states that ICANN shall operate to the extent feasible in an open and transparent manner and consistent with procedures designed to ensure fairness. This is not the first time this has happened. When the new transfers policy was implemented, Verisign negotiated a change in the registry-registrar agreement with the ICANN staff, which was approved by the ICANN Board, to accommodate the transfers policy that contained changes beyond purely for the purposes of the transfers policy without any public consultation. ICANN staff gave an undertaking to registrars that this would not happen again. It is the registrars view that this verbal undertaking was breached. The changes to the .net agreement that specifically concern registrars are: - the maximum price ($4.25 including the ICANN registry fee) put forward by Verisign in the .net application only applies for the first 18 months of the new agreement. After that Verisign is free is set any price. Registrars want the maximum price fixed for the duration of the agreement. - Verisign is excluded from new consensus policies that relate to the introduction of new registry services other than what is in the new .net agreement. Registrars want Verisign to continue to be subject to consensus policies in this area. - ICANN may not change the above terms in a renewal of the agreement. Registrars want ICANN to have the ability to negotiate a lower maximum price at the time of contract renewal."

1 0

GNSO Public forum address gnso-lux[at]icann.org
by GNSO.SECRETARIAT＠GNSO.ICANN.ORG July 12, 2005

July 12, 2005

[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org] [To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org] [To: gnso-dow123[at]gnso.icann.org] Sorry there is yet another change: The correct address is: gnso-lux[at]icann.org -- Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat - ICANN gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

GNSO Public forum address gnso-lux[at]icann.org
by GNSO.SECRETARIAT＠GNSO.ICANN.ORG July 12, 2005

July 12, 2005

[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org] [To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org] [To: gnso-dow123[at]gnso.icann.org] Sorry there is yet another change: The correct address is: gnso-lux[at]icann.org -- Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat - ICANN gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

change of address: GNSO Luxembourg public forum participation
by GNSO.SECRETARIAT＠GNSO.ICANN.ORG July 12, 2005

July 12, 2005

[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org] [To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org] IMPORTANT NOTICE: Change of address: The GNSO Public Forum at 12:30 UTC, (8:30 EDT, 14:30 CET, 00:30 Wellington) is open for comments and participation at the following address: gnsolux[at]gnso.icann.org -- Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat - ICANN gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

GNSO Luxembourg public forum participation
by GNSO.SECRETARIAT＠GNSO.ICANN.ORG July 12, 2005

July 12, 2005

[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org] [To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org] The GNSO Public Forum at 12:30 UTC, (8:30 EDT, 14:30 CET, 00:30 Wellington) is open for comments and participation at the following address: gnso-lux[at]gnso.icann.org -- Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat - ICANN gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Regarding attendance at DNS SEC workshop at ICANN
by Bruce Tonkin July 12, 2005

July 12, 2005

Hello All, Note that the gtld registrars and gtld registries were not able to attend the DNSSEC workshop today in Luxembourg, due to a joint registrar/registry meeting at the same time. Not sure if their attendance was expected. Regards, Bruce

1 0