February 2007 - council - lists.icann.org

RE: [council] Draft minutes of the GNSO Council teleconference on 1 February 2007
by Bruce Tonkin Feb. 5, 2007

Feb. 5, 2007

Hello Chuck, > I would > suggest that the minutes be changed to say something like > this regarding the SoW: "The Council approved formation of > the Working Group with a Statement of Work that will be > revised to incorporate changes as indicated below. . . ." > That was my understanding of the decision. Regards, Bruce Tonkin

1 0

Draft minutes of the GNSO Council teleconference on 1 February 2007
by GNSO.SECRETARIAT＠GNSO.ICANN.ORG Feb. 5, 2007

Feb. 5, 2007

[To: council[at]gnso.icann.org] Dear Council Members, Please find the draft minutes of the GNSO Council teleconference held on 1 February 2007. Please let me know if you would like any changes made. Thank you very much. Kind regards, Glen .................................................................................... 1 February 2007 Proposed agenda and relevant documents List of attendees: Philip Sheppard - Commercial & Business Users C. - absent - apologies Marilyn Cade - Commercial & Business Users C. Alistair Dixon - Commercial & Business Users C Greg Ruth - ISCPC Antonio Harris - ISCPC - absent - apologies Tony Holmes - ISCPC Thomas Keller- Registrars Ross Rader - Registrars Bruce Tonkin - Registrars Chuck Gomes - gTLD registries Edmon Chung - gTLD registries Cary Karp - gTLD registries Kristina Rosette - Intellectual Property Interests C Ute Decker - Intellectual Property Interests C - absent apologies Kiyoshi Tsuru - Intellectual Property Interests C - absent Robin Gross - NCUC. Norbert Klein - NCUC. - absent Mawaki Chango - NCUC - absent - apologies Sophia Bekele - Nominating Committee appointee Jon Bing - Nominating Committee appointee - absent - apologies Avri Doria - Nominating Committee appointee- absent - apologies 13 Council Members (19 Votes - quorum) ICANN Staff Dan Halloran - Deputy General Counsel Sue Jonklaas - Regional Business Advisor, Asia-Pacific, General Counsel Denise Michel - Vice President, Policy Development Kurt Pritz - Senior Vice President, Services Liz Williams - Senior Policy Counselor Maria Farrell - GNSO Policy Officer Craig Schwartz - Chief gTLD Registry Liaison Glen de Saint Géry - GNSO Secretariat Olof Nordling - Manager, Policy Development Coordination - absent - apologies Rita Rodin - ICANN Board member - absent - apologies GNSO Council Liaisons Suzanne Sene - GAC Liaison - absent - apologies Alan Greenberg - ALAC Liaison - absent Quorum present at 20:10 UTC. MP3 Recording Bruce Tonkin chaired this meeting Approval of the agenda Item 1: Update any Statements of Interest No updates Item 2: Approval of the GNSO Council minutes of 18 January 2007 Tom Keller moved the adoption of the GNSO Council minutes of 18 January 2007 An abstention was noted from a Council members who was not yet on the Council on 18 January 2007, Mike Rodenbaugh and Tony Holmes who was absent Motion approved. Approval of the GNSO Council minutes of 18 January 2007 Decision 1: The GNSO Council minutes of 18 January 2007 were adopted. Item 3: Proposed Working Group on "Protecting the rights of others" - Proposal to form a GNSO working group to consider possible policies and practices that minimize abusive registration activities and other activities that affect the legal rights of others. - Kristina Rosette and Ute Decker to draft terms of reference for Consideration Kristina Rosette presented the draft outline for work of the Working Group on Mechanisms to protect rights of others, including preventive Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg03173.html Proposed Purpose: New TLD registries will be responsible for policies and practices that minimize abusive registration activities that affect the legal rights of others. That includes measures to discourage the registration of domain names that infringe intellectual property rights and minimize abusive registrations. At present, a number of TLD registries, and notably sTLD registries, are required to implement safeguards against allowing unqualified registration and to ensure compliance with ICANN policies designed to protect rights of others. The working group should aim to identify the problems that a preventive rights protection mechanism is intended to solve. This includes infringement of trademarks and bad faith registrations. The working group should examine whether existing mechanisms, such as sunrise periods, have been successful in preventing and addressing abusive registration practices. The working group should also explore alternative ways of solving the identified problems as part of the implementation plan for new TLDs. As part of this work, the working group will analyze existing mechanisms, identify commonalities among such processes, discuss who would be eligible to rely on the preventive protection mechanism for new TLDs, assess the feasibility of drawing from existing mechanisms, and identify and evaluate alternatives to existing processes. Suggested Outline of Working Group Work Plan I. Analyze Existing Rights Protection Mechanisms A. Identify relevant existing TLDs (not limited to gTLDs) B. Identify both problems that existing preventive mechanisms are designed to solve and new problems that may have developed C. Describe existing rights protection mechanisms 1. Eligibility 2. Rights bases or requirements 3. Submission process and costs of submission 4. Review of applications 5. Challenge mechanism and cost of mechanism D. Issues arising out of or related to the existing rights protection mechanisms 1. Eligibility 2. Rights bases or requirements 3. Review of applications 4. Allocation E. Analyze Quantitative Success – relation between preventing the dispute and resolving the dispute 1. Define quantitative success in light of the problems identified in I.B. 2. Number of preventive registrations, number of preventive registrations vs. overall number of registrations; proportion of registrations that are purely defensive 3. Number of challenges overall and in relation to number of registrations; challenger success rate 4. Evaluate quantitative success in light of the problems identified in I.B. F. Analyze Qualitative Success 1. Define qualitative success in light of problems identified in I.B. 2. Nature of use of names registered during start up period 3. Whether rights protection mechanism process protects rights in a cost-effective manner in light of problems identified in I.B. 4. Evaluate qualitative success in light of problems identified in I.B. G. Impact on registries and registrars 1. Resource allocation a) Development of rights protection mechanism b) Implementation of rights protection mechanism 2. Other considerations H. Impact on other affect parties II. Identify Commonalities and Variances among existing rights protection mechanisms, including the evaluation by affected parties. A. Eligibility Commonalities and Variances B. Procedural Commonalities and Variances 1. Submission 2. Review 3. Challenge C. Level of Satisfaction 1. Prior Rights Owners 2. Registrars 3. Registries 4. Other Categories III. Scalability of rights protection mechanisms A. Feasibility Conclusions derived from I and II above -- effectiveness; impact on registrars, registries, and other affected parties; concerns of IP owner and holders of other rights B. Implementation Considerations IV. Identify and Evaluate Alternative Mechanisms A. Alternatives B. Evaluation Suggested Working Group Membership The following list sets out initial ideas for experts that would provide useful contributions. The list is neither binding nor enumerative. • Owners of globally famous brands from different regions. • INTA Internet Committee member • Rights protection mechanism dispute panelist • Non-profit educational or charitable organization representative • Registrars with experience in preventive rights protection mechanisms • Registries with experience in preventive rights protection mechanisms • Representative from EURid or PWC, EURid validation agent • Commercial financial institution representative (because of concerns over consumer protection and concerns related to fishing and identity theft) • IPC designee • NCUC designee • ISP designee • BC designee • WIPO representative (given WIPO’s expertise in evaluating existing rights protection mechanisms) Timeline: The working group should conclude its work in time to provide a report for the GNSO Council meeting in April 2007 Material [will be provided by ICANN staff]: Chuck Gomes, on behalf of some registries expressed the concern that some of the wording assumed there was a policy in place and how would the policy be implemented, while in fact there was no policy. Tom Keller emphasised that there should be a balance in the views of the working group. There should be a distinction made between task force members and possible sources of information such as EURid, WIPO etc. Kristina Rosette expressed the concern that it was unrealistic to fully examine the issue of whether there should be a policy in the 2 month time frame. Bruce Tonkin clarified that there were 2 separate issues, a policy which required work to be undertaken in a policy development process and a working group looking at whether existing practices should be improved which would become gguidelines which the staff may wish to implement in the RFP and new registry operators may choose to implement those revised practices based on the advice of the working group. Bruce Tonkin, seconded by Ross Rader proposed: Approving the statement of work for the Working Group on Mechanisms to protect rights of others, including preventive Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms with the following drafting changes to the text assisted by the ICANN staff to be consistent with the new TLD policy development work: a. Form the working group b. Document practices and policies, such as the UDRP, that are currently in existence. c. Identify the problems that the procedures are intended to solve d. Establish definitions of terms used in the working group to ensure all members have a common understanding e. Add text suggested by Chuck Gomes to bring the two working group in line with regard to the formation, voting and membership: Formation of the Working Group. The Working Group (WG) is chartered by the GNSO Council with an approved statement of work, as defined below. This Statement of Work is intended to guide the work of the group. 1. Voting: In general, the working group should operate using a rough consensus approach. Every effort should be made to arrive at positions that most or all of the group members are willing to support. “Straw poll voting” should be used to determine whether there is rough consensus on particular issues. In order to ensure that each constituency does not have to provide the same number of members, constituencies, regardless of number of representatives, can hold 3 votes, and each individual nominating committee councilor hold one vote. Liaisons are non voting. 2. Membership The Working Group is open for membership to Councilors and to GNSO Constituency members; advisory committees (e.g., ALAC, GAC) may appoint non-voting liaisons to the working group. Members may be added by the constituencies and the Advisory groups at any time during the work of the WG. The ccNSO could be invited to have representatives participate as observers because there may be implications for the treatment of the two letter country codes, which are presently reserved at all levels. The WG may invite external experts as speakers or advisors (in the role of observer) that may be able to constructively contribute to the effort. Every effort should be made to ensure that the working group include and consider the varying points of view on key issues. It is more important that all varying points of view are examined and reflected than for every constituency or group to have representation or equal numbers of members. If this goal is achieved and recommendations are developed that have rough consensus of the group, then the full Council, with balanced representation from all constituencies and NomCom appointees, will then have opportunity to act. Members should be selected who can commit sufficient time during the next three-four months to facilitate achievement of the targeted accomplishments describe in the next section (Working Timeline). The Council will appoint an initial or interim chair [or co-chairs] and the Working Group should, at its initial meeting, elect or confirm the chair and co-chair(s). 3. Working Timeline The Working Group is asked to convene at the earliest possible time and to achieve the following targets: 1. Progress report in the upcoming intercessional working sessions of Dec05 PDP committee and the Feb06 PDP task force, scheduled for February 22-25 2. Progress report at least one week prior to the start of the Lisbon ICANN meetings (16 March 2007). 3. Final report at least one week prior to the April 2007 GNSO Council meeting. The motion passed by a unanimous vote of acclamation. Decision 2: Council approved the statement of work for the Working Group on Mechanisms to protect rights of others, including preventive Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms with the following drafting changes to the text assisted by the ICANN staff to be consistent with the new gTLD policy development work: a. Form the working group b. Document practices and policies, such as the UDRP, that are currently in existence. c. Identify the problems that the procedures are intended to solve d. Establish definitions of terms used in the working group to ensure all members have a common understanding e. Add text suggested by Chuck Gomes to bring the two working group in line with regard to the formation, voting and membership: Formation of the Working Group. The Working Group (WG) is chartered by the GNSO Council with an approved statement of work, as defined below. This Statement of Work is intended to guide the work of the group. 1. Voting: In general, the working group should operate using a rough consensus approach. Every effort should be made to arrive at positions that most or all of the group members are willing to support. “Straw poll voting” should be used to determine whether there is rough consensus on particular issues. In order to ensure that each constituency does not have to provide the same number of members, constituencies, regardless of number of representatives, can hold 3 votes, and each individual nominating committee councilor hold one vote. Liaisons are non voting. 2. Membership The Working Group is open for membership to Councilors and to GNSO Constituency members; advisory committees (e.g., ALAC, GAC) may appoint non-voting liaisons to the working group. Members may be added by the constituencies and the Advisory groups at any time during the work of the WG. The ccNSO could be invited to have representatives participate as observers because there may be implications for the treatment of the two letter country codes, which are presently reserved at all levels. The WG may invite external experts as speakers or advisors (in the role of observer) that may be able to constructively contribute to the effort. Every effort should be made to ensure that the working group include and consider the varying points of view on key issues. It is more important that all varying points of view are examined and reflected than for every constituency or group to have representation or equal numbers of members. If this goal is achieved and recommendations are developed that have rough consensus of the group, then the full Council, with balanced representation from all constituencies and NomCom appointees, will then have opportunity to act. Members should be selected who can commit sufficient time during the next three-four months to facilitate achievement of the targeted accomplishments describe in the next section (Working Timeline). The Council will appoint an initial or interim chair [or co-chairs] and the Working Group should, at its initial meeting, elect or confirm the chair and co-chair(s). 3. Working Timeline The Working Group is asked to convene at the earliest possible time and to achieve the following targets: 1. Progress report in the upcoming intercessional working sessions of Dec05 PDP committee and the Feb06 PDP task force, scheduled for February 22-25 2. Progress report at least one week prior to the start of the Lisbon ICANN meetings (16 March 2007). 3. Final report at least one week prior to the April 2007 GNSO Council meeting. Item 4: Process for electing a replacement for ICANN Board seat #13 Alejandro Pisanty's term on the ICANN Board concludes 6 months after the ICANN annual meeting in 2006 (ie 8 June 2007). As recorded in the minutes of 19 Feb 04 (http://www.gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-gnso-19feb04.shtml) Alejandro is not eligible for re-election as he has reached the term limit provisions in the ICANN bylaws ("no Director may serve more than three consecutive terms"). The GNSO must inform the Secretary of ICANN of its selection for Board Seat #13 before 8 May 2007. Note also at any given time, no two Directors selected by a Supporting Organization shall be citizens of the same country or of countries located in the same Geographic Region. Rita Rodin was recently selected by the GNSO to fill ICANN Board Seat #14, and is from North America. (From ICANN bylaws http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#VI , Article VI, section 8, clauses 1(e) and 3, and Section 2, clause 3) The GNSO Secretariat will propose a timeline/process for consideration. The Secretariat proposed the following timelines and summarised the election procedure: http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg03184.html Call for nominations by members of the GNSO Council: 3 weeks for Nominations: Opens on Monday 19 February 2007 closes on Monday 12 March 2007 Two weeks to verify and interview candidates Monday 12 March 2007 to Sunday 25 March 2007 Start voting - first round Monday 2 April 2007 - Monday 9 April 2007 Start voting - second round Monday 9 April 2007 - Monday 16 April Start voting - third round Monday 16 April 2007 - Monday 23 April The results will be announced on 24 April, or before if the voting is successfully completed. Proposed dates for GNSO Council meeting to confirm results: Thursday 26 April OR Thursday 3 May in time for the GNSO to give due notice of its selection no later than five months after the Annual Meeting 2006, which would be 8 May 2007. In accordance with the ICANN Bylaws From Article VI, http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#VI 3. In carrying out their responsibilities to fill Seats 9 through 14, the Supporting Organizations shall seek to ensure that the ICANN Board is composed of members that in the aggregate display diversity in geography, culture, skills, experience, and perspective, by applying the criteria set forth in Section 3 of this Article. At any given time, no two Directors selected by a Supporting Organization shall be citizens of the same country or of countries located in the same Geographic Region. The other ICANN Board seat holder elected by the GNSO is Rita Rodin from North America. Templates will be available for Nomination and Seconding of candidates All nominations must be seconded by another GNSO Council member. Each nomination must be accompanied by a brief description of how the candidate meets the following selection criteria. http://www.icann.org/general/archive-bylaws/bylaws-28feb06.htm In addition, the candidate should fulfill the additional qualifications in section 4, and international representation in section 5 of the ICANN bylaws should be respected. Only GNSO Council members may nominate, second and vote for candidates, although GNSO Council members should consult with their constituencies with regard to suitable candidates. All GNSO Council members are eligible to vote, that is, 3 representatives from each constituency, Registrars, gTLD registries, Commercial and Business Users (CBUC), Non Commercial Users (NCUC), Intellectual Property (IPC), and Internet Service Providers and Connectivity Providers (ISPCP) and the 3 Nominating Committee appointees. Liaisons from the ALAC and the GAC do not vote. As provided in the ICANN bylaws, each GNSO Council member representing either the registrars constituency or the gTLD registries constituency will be entitled to cast two votes in each round, and all other members (including those selected by the Nominating Committee) shall be entitled to cast one vote. GNSO Council members who are candidates, will be replaced temporarily on the Council by a member chosen by the constituency affected and that person will have the right to vote. The GNSO Secretariat will confirm the nomination, by sending an e-mail to the candidate requesting their acceptance and convey the nomination and the acceptance thereof to the GNSO Council list. The voting will be "convention style" voting which consists of sequential rounds of voting until a single candidate receives a majority of the votes on the GNSO Council. For this reason several rounds of voting have been foreseen. (see: Appendix A Convention Style Voting) There will be a total of 27 votes cast and a majority is 14 or more. Voting will take place by secret e-mail ballot which will be sent will be sent out individually to each GNSO Council members' e-mail address. At the scheduled times, the Secretariat will announce the results of each round of balloting mentioning the confidential code number of each ballot and the candidate for whom it was voted for Council members to check. In exceptional cases where a GNSO Council member has no Internet access during the voting period, a voice vote may be registered with the GNSO Secretariat personally during the voting period, before the vote is closed. The GNSO Council will confirm the results of the voting at a Council meeting. Bruce Tonkin, seconded by Alistair Dixon proposed that the Council endorses the election procedure and the timelines for the ICANN Board seat # 13 as presented to the Council. The motion was passed by an unanimous vote of acclamation Decision 4: Council endorses the proposed election procedure and timelines for the ICANN Board seat # 13. Call for nominations by members of the GNSO Council: 3 weeks for Nominations: Opens on Monday 19 February 2007 closes on Monday 12 March 2007 Two weeks to verify and interview candidates Monday 12 March 2007 to Sunday 25 March 2007 Start voting - first round Monday 2 April 2007 - Monday 9 April 2007 Start voting - second round Monday 9 April 2007 - Monday 16 April Start voting - third round Monday 16 April 2007 - Monday 23 April Announce results 24 April, or before if the voting is successfully completed. Proposed dates for GNSO Council meeting to confirm results: Thursday 26 April OR Thursday 3 May in time for the GNSO to give due notice of its selection no later than five months after the Annual Meeting 2006, which would be 8 May 2007. In accordance with the ICANN Bylaws From Article VI, http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#VI 3. In carrying out their responsibilities to fill Seats 9 through 14, the Supporting Organizations shall seek to ensure that the ICANN Board is composed of members that in the aggregate display diversity in geography, culture, skills, experience, and perspective, by applying the criteria set forth in Section 3 of this Article. At any given time, no two Directors selected by a Supporting Organization shall be citizens of the same country or of countries located in the same Geographic Region. [Note the other ICANN Board seat holder elected by the GNSO is Rita Rodin] Templates will be available for Nomination and Seconding of candidates All nominations must be seconded by another GNSO Council member. Each nomination must be accompanied by a brief description of how the candidate meets the following selection criteria http://www.icann.org/general/archive-bylaws/bylaws-28feb06.htm Section 3. CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF DIRECTORS ICANN Directors shall be: Accomplished persons of integrity, objectivity, and intelligence, with reputations for sound judgment and open minds, and a demonstrated capacity for thoughtful group decision-making; Persons with an understanding of ICANN's mission and the potential impact of ICANN decisions on the global Internet community, and committed to the success of ICANN; Persons who will produce the broadest cultural and geographic diversity on the Board consistent with meeting the other criteria set forth in this Section; Persons who, in the aggregate, have personal familiarity with the operation of gTLD registries and registrars; with ccTLD registries; with IP address registries; with Internet technical standards and protocols; with policy-development procedures, legal traditions, and the public interest; and with the broad range of business, individual, academic, and non-commercial users of the Internet; Persons who are willing to serve as volunteers, without compensation other than the reimbursement of certain expenses; and Persons who are able to work and communicate in written and spoken English. Section 4. ADDITIONAL QUALIFICATIONS 1. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no official of a national government or a multinational entity established by treaty or other agreement between national governments may serve as a Director. As used herein, the term "official" means a person (i) who holds an elective governmental office or (ii) who is employed by such government or multinational entity and whose primary function with such government or entity is to develop or influence governmental or public policies. 2. No person who serves in any capacity (including as a liaison) on any Supporting Organization Council shall simultaneously serve as a Director or liaison to the Board. If such a person accepts a nomination to be considered for selection by the Supporting Organization Council to be a Director, the person shall not, following such nomination, participate in any discussion of, or vote by, the Supporting Organization Council relating to the selection of Directors by the Council, until the Council has selected the full complement of Directors it is responsible for selecting. In the event that a person serving in any capacity on a Supporting Organization Council accepts a nomination to be considered for selection as a Director, the constituency group or other group or entity that selected the person may select a replacement for purposes of the Council's selection process. 3. Persons serving in any capacity on the Nominating Committee shall be ineligible for selection to positions on the Board as provided by Article VII, Section 8. Section 5. INTERNATIONAL REPRESENTATION In order to ensure broad international representation on the Board, the selection of Directors by the Nominating Committee and each Supporting Organization shall comply with all applicable diversity provisions of these Bylaws or of any Memorandum of Understanding referred to in these Bylaws concerning the Supporting Organization. One intent of these diversity provisions is to ensure that at all times each Geographic Region shall have at least one Director, and at all times no region shall have more than five Directors on the Board (not including the President). As used in these Bylaws, each of the following is considered to be a "Geographic Region": Europe; Asia/Australia/Pacific; Latin America/Caribbean islands; Africa; and North America. The specific countries included in each Geographic Region shall be determined by the Board, and this Section shall be reviewed by the Board from time to time (but at least every three years) to determine whether any change is appropriate, taking account of the evolution of the Internet. Only GNSO Council members may nominate and vote for candidates, although GNSO Council members should consult with their constituencies with regard to suitable candidates Accepting Nominations: The GNSO Secretariat will confirm the nomination, by sending an e-mail to the candidate requesting their acceptance. The GNSO Secretariat shall convey the nomination and the acceptance thereof to the GNSO Council list. B. VOTING PROCEDURE The voting will be "convention style" voting. This consists of sequential rounds of voting until a single candidate receives a majority of the votes on the GNSO Council. (see: Appendix A Convention Style Voting http://gnso.icann.org/elections/election-procedures-01jun06.htm) (There will be a total of 27 votes cast and a majority is 14 or more.) C. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR THE ROUNDS OF CONVENTION STYLE VOTING Start voting - first round Monday 2 April 2007 - Monday 9 April 2007 Start voting - second round Monday 9 April 2007 - Monday 16 April Start voting - third round Monday 16 April 2007 - Monday 23 April D. GNSO COUNCIL MEMBERS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE: All GNSO Council members are eligible to vote, that is, 3 representatives from each constituency, Registrars, gTLD registries, Commercial and Business Users (CBUC), Non Commercial Users (NCUC), Intellectual Property (IPC), and Internet Service Providers and Connectivity Providers (ISPCP) and the 3 Nominating Committee appointees. Liaisons from the ALAC and the GAC do not vote. GNSO Council members who are candidates, will be replaced temporarily on the Council by a member chosen by the constituency affected and that person will have the right to vote. E. COUNTING OF VOTES: As provided in the ICANN bylaws, http://www.icann.org/general/archive-bylaws/bylaws-28feb06.htm, Article X, section 5.2. each GNSO Council member representing either the registrars constituency or the gTLD registries constituency will be entitled to cast two votes in each round, and all other members (including those selected by the Nominating Committee) shall be entitled to cast one vote. There will be a total of 27 votes cast and a majority is 14 or more. F. VOTING Voting will take place by secret e-mail ballot. 1. Ballots will be sent out individually to each GNSO Council members' e-mail address. 2. Ballots should be filled out and returned to the e-mail address stated in the ballot. They should not be copied to any e-mail list. 3. At the scheduled times, the Secretariat will announce the results of each round of balloting by sending a message to the <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> mailing list. These announcements will include: a. The number of votes received by each candidate; b. The names of the GNSO Council members from whom ballots were received; and c. The confidential code number of each ballot and the candidate for whom it was voted. Item 3(c) will allow each GNSO Council member to double-check that his or her ballot was properly understood, but will not allow others to determine how the member voted. 4. In exceptional cases where a GNSO Council member has no Internet access during the voting period, a voice vote may be registered with the GNSO Secretariat personally during the voting period, before the vote is closed. G. DISCLOSURE OF THE VOTING The Secretariat will announce the outcome of the voting at the close of the voting period. The GNSO Council will confirm the results of the voting at a Council meeting. Once that occurs, the GNSO Secretariat will prepare and post a full record of all voting, including how each member voted in each round. H. DISCUSSION MAILING LIST DURING ELECTIONS 1. In accordance with a decision as noted in: http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20030325.GNSOrio-captioning.html http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20030325.GNSOrio-minutes.html Public archiving of the GNSO Council list will not be stopped. A separate archive and mailing list will be created for the purpose of managing elections going forward. This list will (a) exclude those Council members who are candidates; but include (b) any liaisons from the ALAC or GAC to the GNSO Council; and (c) the GNSO Secretariat. The list recipients and archiving will be concluded at the end of the process. This list name is elections-gnso@xxxxxxxxx and archives will be posted at http://forum.icann.org/lists/elections-gnso/ following the conclusion of the election. 2. Messages posted to the list should be treated as confidential until the end of the elections. The GNSO Secretariat may, however, disclose them to the General Counsel's office to the extent appropriate to obtain advice about how to handle procedural problems that arise during the voting process. The Council list should continue to be used for normal policy development work. Please note that the General Counsel and Deputy General Counsel will not be recipients of the special election mailing list during this period, so they should be copied on any particular message that you wish to bring to their attention. Item 5 AOB Bruce Tonkin, seconded by Cary Carp, proposed a vote of thanks to Marilyn Cade, from the Commercial and Business Users Constituency whose term expired, for her outstanding service on the Council. The motion passed with an unanimous vote of acclamation. Decision 5: Council thanked Marilyn Cade, from the Commercial and Business Users Constituency whose term expired, for her outstanding service on the Council. Bruce Tonkin formally closed the meeting and thanked everybody for participating. The meeting ended: 22:00 UTC Next GNSO Council teleconference will be on 1 March 2007 at 19:00 UTC. see: Calendar Summary of Work Items arising from the minutes: 1. Arising from Item 3. 1 a. Form working group on Mechanisms to protect rights of others, including preventive Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms. 2 b. Refine the Statement of work with Chuck Gomes, Kristina Rosette, Ute Decker and the General Counsel's office to release a new draft. 2 Arising from Item 4. The call for nominations will open on 19 February 2007. -- Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat - ICANN gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

3 2

RE: [council] FW: Suggested edits for the SoW for the Working Group on "Protecting the rights of others"
by Ute Decker Feb. 1, 2007

Feb. 1, 2007

Thank you, Chuck, for the clarification. I do not agree the working group should make recommendations on the fundamental underlying policy questions. I understood its purpose to be an analysis of established and alternative mechanisms. If your edits were not meant to indicate that protection mechanisms are to be optional, then we should make that clear, also in the interest of achieving a result within the very limited time available. One way forward for the beginning of the purpose section - drawing on the wording of the material Bruce circulated earlier - may be: "In a new round of proposals for new TLD registries, applicants will be asked to propose a number of procedures around the launch of that TLD. One issue to consider are practices that attempt to minimize abusive registration activities that affect the legal rights of others. Relevant practices include measures to discourage the registration of domain names that infringe intellectual property rights and minimize abusive registrations. At present, a number of TLD registries, and notably some sTLD registries, are required to implement safeguards against allowing unqualified registration and to ensure compliance with ICANN policies designed to protect rights of others. (...)" -----Original Message----- From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@verisign.com] Sent: 01 February 2007 17:56 To: Ute Decker; Council GNSO Subject: RE: [council] FW: Suggested edits for the SoW for the Working Group on "Protecting the rights of others" Ute, The point is that it should be up to the WG to make recommendations. The SoW should not make the recommendations for them. We are not at a point where we are approving anything yet so no objection is necessary. That is why we are forming the WG. Chuck ________________________________ From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Ute Decker Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 11:57 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: RE: [council] FW: Suggested edits for the SoW for the Working Group on "Protecting the rights of others" In response to Chuck's edits: The additional section on the formation of the working group is very helpful as a basis for discussion on the call, thanks (the timelines are more than ambitious though). The edits to the 'Suggested Outline of Woking Group Work Plan' section all seem helpful. However, the suggested changes to the 'proposed purpose' section are problematic. E.g., Chuck's edits would include: "This could include recommendations for practices that attempt to minimize abusive registration activities that affect the legal rights o others. That could include measures to discourage the registration of domain names that infringe intellectual property rights and minimize abusive registrations." (1st para, sentences 2 &3). We understand these two sentences to mean that the adoption by new gTLD/sTLD registries of policies or mechanisms to prevent abusive registrations should be optional. If that is correct, we object. A requirement for mechanisms to protect the rights of others (including preventive mechanisms) against abusive registrations is essential. See, for example, Terms of Reference 2, Paragraph 13, GNSO Initial Report, Introduction of New Generic Top Level Domains, July 2006 calling for the introduction of policies to "address domain name registration violations", as well as the message circulated by Bruce just a few weeks ago (and attached again). If the edits serve another purpose (e.g. reflect the status of the PDP Dec05 work) this should be clarified in a way that carries forward and does not distract from the understanding that protection against abusive registrations will be a requirement for new TLDs. Apologies that I will not be able to join the call tonight. I take it that thankfully Kristina will be on for the IPC. Best wishes Ute -----Original Message----- From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck Sent: 01 February 2007 14:06 To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] FW: Suggested edits for the SoW for the Working Group on "Protecting the rights of others" Importance: High Note that I mistakenly sent this to the RN-WG list instead of the Council. Please accept my apologies; I wanted to send it out sooner. I hope there is time to review it before today's meeting. Chuck ________________________________ From: Gomes, Chuck Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 5:58 PM To: RN-WG Mailing List (gnso-rn-wg(a)icann.org) Subject: Suggested edits for the SoW for the Working Group on "Protecting the rights of others" Importance: High I would like to first of all thank Kristina and Ute for their efforts in revising the outline of the SoW for the proposed Working Group on "Protecting the rights of others". I appreciate the work they did to incorporate the edits that several of us suggested. The attached document contains some edits that some of us from the RyC recommend be made before the Council takes action on the SoW in our meeting tomorrow. Note that the edits are highlighted using the Word tracking function. I will be happy to answer questions about the suggested edits on this list prior to the meeting and in our meeting tomorrow. Please note that I added at the end of the document several paragraphs from the RN-WG approved SoW. My intent in doing this was to hopefully help us as the Council be able to approve a document tomorrow that will facilitate a quick startup of the WG. In particular, I added the paragraphs relating to the following: Formation of the Working Group; Voting; Membership; Working Timeline. Note that the Membership paragraphs include language about an interim chair and permanent chair. Except for the timeline, I simply cut and pasted the text from the RN-WG; for the timeline, I changed the language to correspond to what I think to be the targets that may be desired by the Council. Chuck

2 1

GNSO Council teleconference MP3 recording 1 February 2007
by GNSO.SECRETARIAT＠GNSO.ICANN.ORG Feb. 1, 2007

Feb. 1, 2007

[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org [To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org] Please find the MP3 recording of the GNSO Council teleconference, held on February 1, 2007 at: http://gnso-audio.icann.org/GNSO-Council-20070201.mp3 http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#feb Happy listening! Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat - ICANN gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Would someone please send me the call in number?
by Rosette, Kristina Feb. 1, 2007

Feb. 1, 2007

Thanks!

1 0

RE: [council] FW: Suggested edits for the SoW for the Working Group on "Protecting the rights of others"
by Ute Decker Feb. 1, 2007

Feb. 1, 2007

In response to Chuck's edits: The additional section on the formation of the working group is very helpful as a basis for discussion on the call, thanks (the timelines are more than ambitious though). The edits to the 'Suggested Outline of Woking Group Work Plan' section all seem helpful. However, the suggested changes to the 'proposed purpose' section are problematic. E.g., Chuck's edits would include: "This could include recommendations for practices that attempt to minimize abusive registration activities that affect the legal rights o others. That could include measures to discourage the registration of domain names that infringe intellectual property rights and minimize abusive registrations." (1st para, sentences 2 &3). We understand these two sentences to mean that the adoption by new gTLD/sTLD registries of policies or mechanisms to prevent abusive registrations should be optional. If that is correct, we object. A requirement for mechanisms to protect the rights of others (including preventive mechanisms) against abusive registrations is essential. See, for example, Terms of Reference 2, Paragraph 13, GNSO Initial Report, Introduction of New Generic Top Level Domains, July 2006 calling for the introduction of policies to "address domain name registration violations", as well as the message circulated by Bruce just a few weeks ago (and attached again). If the edits serve another purpose (e.g. reflect the status of the PDP Dec05 work) this should be clarified in a way that carries forward and does not distract from the understanding that protection against abusive registrations will be a requirement for new TLDs. Apologies that I will not be able to join the call tonight. I take it that thankfully Kristina will be on for the IPC. Best wishes Ute -----Original Message----- From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck Sent: 01 February 2007 14:06 To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] FW: Suggested edits for the SoW for the Working Group on "Protecting the rights of others" Importance: High Note that I mistakenly sent this to the RN-WG list instead of the Council. Please accept my apologies; I wanted to send it out sooner. I hope there is time to review it before today's meeting. Chuck ________________________________ From: Gomes, Chuck Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 5:58 PM To: RN-WG Mailing List (gnso-rn-wg(a)icann.org) Subject: Suggested edits for the SoW for the Working Group on "Protecting the rights of others" Importance: High I would like to first of all thank Kristina and Ute for their efforts in revising the outline of the SoW for the proposed Working Group on "Protecting the rights of others". I appreciate the work they did to incorporate the edits that several of us suggested. The attached document contains some edits that some of us from the RyC recommend be made before the Council takes action on the SoW in our meeting tomorrow. Note that the edits are highlighted using the Word tracking function. I will be happy to answer questions about the suggested edits on this list prior to the meeting and in our meeting tomorrow. Please note that I added at the end of the document several paragraphs from the RN-WG approved SoW. My intent in doing this was to hopefully help us as the Council be able to approve a document tomorrow that will facilitate a quick startup of the WG. In particular, I added the paragraphs relating to the following: Formation of the Working Group; Voting; Membership; Working Timeline. Note that the Membership paragraphs include language about an interim chair and permanent chair. Except for the timeline, I simply cut and pasted the text from the RN-WG; for the timeline, I changed the language to correspond to what I think to be the targets that may be desired by the Council. Chuck

2 1

FW: Suggested edits for the SoW for the Working Group on "Protecting the rights of others"
by Gomes, Chuck Feb. 1, 2007

Feb. 1, 2007

Note that I mistakenly sent this to the RN-WG list instead of the Council. Please accept my apologies; I wanted to send it out sooner. I hope there is time to review it before today's meeting. Chuck ________________________________ From: Gomes, Chuck Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 5:58 PM To: RN-WG Mailing List (gnso-rn-wg(a)icann.org) Subject: Suggested edits for the SoW for the Working Group on "Protecting the rights of others" Importance: High I would like to first of all thank Kristina and Ute for their efforts in revising the outline of the SoW for the proposed Working Group on "Protecting the rights of others". I appreciate the work they did to incorporate the edits that several of us suggested. The attached document contains some edits that some of us from the RyC recommend be made before the Council takes action on the SoW in our meeting tomorrow. Note that the edits are highlighted using the Word tracking function. I will be happy to answer questions about the suggested edits on this list prior to the meeting and in our meeting tomorrow. Please note that I added at the end of the document several paragraphs from the RN-WG approved SoW. My intent in doing this was to hopefully help us as the Council be able to approve a document tomorrow that will facilitate a quick startup of the WG. In particular, I added the paragraphs relating to the following: Formation of the Working Group; Voting; Membership; Working Timeline. Note that the Membership paragraphs include language about an interim chair and permanent chair. Except for the timeline, I simply cut and pasted the text from the RN-WG; for the timeline, I changed the language to correspond to what I think to be the targets that may be desired by the Council. Chuck

2 1

GNSO Council Statements of Interest - recent update
by GNSO.SECRETARIAT＠GNSO.ICANN.ORG Feb. 1, 2007

Feb. 1, 2007

[council[at]gnso.icann.org] Dear All, Alistair Dixon's, (Commercial and Business Users Constituency) Statement of Interest has been added. The current status is that all Council members have submitted statements of interest. They are ordered according to constituencies: 1. Registrar Constituency 2. Commercial and Business Users Constituency 3. Internet Service Providers and Connectivity Providers Constituency 4. Non Commercial Users Constituency 5. Intellectual Property Interests Constituency 6. gTLD Registries constituency 7. Nominating Committee appointees to the GNSO Council Please let me know if there are any other updates you would like made. Thank you very much. Kind regards, Glen ...................................................................... Registrar Constituency Bruce Tonkin - Registrar Constituency - GNSO Council chair I am employed full-time as Chief Technology Officer by Melbourne IT Limited. Melbourne IT has a registrar accreditation agreement with ICANN. Melbourne IT also has a contractual relationship with most gtld registries (for a current list see http://www.icann.org/registrars/accredited-list.html) and many cctld registries as a registrar. .................................................................... Ross Rader - - Registrar Constituency I am the Director of Research and Innovation for Tucows Inc., an ICANN accredited registrar and Internet services vendor. Tucows is a minority shareholder in Afilias LLC, with roughly an 8% shareholding. Neither Tucows, nor I, is in possession of, nor have access to Registry Sensitive or Registry Proprietary information as defined by any relevant registry operating contracts as a result of this relationship. Tucows provides consulting and application hosting services to other registrars and Internet services providers. I am not an officer, director, consultant, or employee of any of these customer organizations nor am I specifically involved in providing services to them. The URL for this statement is: http://www.byte.org/blog/_WebPages/StatementofInterestsforRossRader.html ........................................................................ Thomas Keller - - Registrar Constituency I'm a full time employee of Schlund+Partner AG. Schlund+Partner AG is ICANN accredited and is conducting business with almost all major gTLDS and ccTLDs. Schlund holds a minority share in Afilias LLC for investment purposes.Besides domain name registrations Schlund is mainly offering webhosting and email services to end users. I'm a member of the DENIC Technical Advisory Council. ....................................................................... ....................................................................... Commercial and Business Users Constituency Alistair Dixon - Commercial and Business Users Constituency I am a Regulatory and Industry Advisor for TelstraClear, a New Zealand-based wholly owned subsidiary of Telstra Corporation. My role consists of providing advice and representing TelstraClear in its interactions with the New Zealand Government and regulators. TelstraClear is a full service telecommunications provider and operates ISP businesses in New Zealand. TelstraClear is a registrar in the .nz domain. TelstraClear's parent company Telstra Corporation is a telecommunications provider that has businesses and customers throughout the world though principally in the Asia-Pacific region. I have no employment, contract, financial interest or other business relationship with ICANN, registries or registrars. ....................................................................... Philip Sheppard - Commercial and Business Users Constituency I am Public Affairs Manager for AIM - European Brands Association, a Brussels-based trade association involved in public affairs activities. AIM represents the branded goods industries in Europe on key issues which affect the ability of brand manufacturers to design, distribute and market their brands. AIM's membership groups 1800 companies of all sizes through corporate members and national associations in 21 countries. These companies are mostly active in every day consumer goods. AIM's mission is to create for brands an environment of fair and vigorous competition, fostering innovation and guaranteeing maximum value to consumers. I hold various non-remunerated directorships unrelated to ICANN. I am a contact point for several domain names. Honorary positions: - President 2007 International Public Relations Association (IPRA), the global professional association for the PR profession. - I am a Freeman of the City of London. ...................................................................... Mike Rodenbaugh - Commercial and Business Users Constituency I am employed full-time by Yahoo! Inc., as Senior Legal Director. I have been elected to the GNSO Council by the Commercial and Business Users Constituency. Yahoo! is a leading global Internet brand and one of the most trafficked Internet destinations worldwide. Yahoo!'s mission is to connect people to their passions, their communities, and the world's knowledge. I engage ICANN issues from Yahoo!'s perspective as a premier online brand and diversified business, highly valuing the perspectives of our customers, partners and users. Yahoo! has hundreds of thousands of online business customers and partners which advertise and provide services to our global audience. We are interested in seeing all of these businesses succeed and grow. These businesses work with Yahoo! because we have earned one of the world's largest audiences, requiring that the 'user perspective' remain extremely important to us always. And, of course Yahoo! is a famous brand that is extremely challenging to protect and enforce online, worldwide. I believe businesses of all types and sizes share our interest in the rapid growth of internet commerce, balanced with fair protection of existing property interests. I look forward to working with the Council to address the many serious issues that existing businesses encounter as a result of ICANN policy. ........................................................................... ........................................................................... ISPCP Constituency Anthony Harris - ISPCP Constituency I am under contract as full time executive director of CABASE, a non-profit Internet industry association, incorporated as such in Argentina since 1999. - consulting work done for ICANN - NONE - consulting work done for a gtld or cctld registry, or current applicant to become a gtld or cctld registry - NONE - consulting work done for a registrar - NONE - employment with a registry or registrar - NONE .......................................................................... Greg Ruth - ISPCP Constituency I am a Senior Consultant for Verizon Business, a global communications, security and technology provider. My duties consist primarily of providing consulting services. As a multi-national organization, Verizon Business has many customer and vendor relationships, and some of those relationships may include ICANN accredited registrars, registries as well as members of other GNSO constituencies. In the normal course of my duties, I have no knowledge of which ICANN related organizations my company is contractually involved with. My position and responsibilities in Verizon Business do not allow me any decision making power, personal involvement, responsibility or other interest in determining or carrying out the contractual relationships in which my company enters. As a global network provider, my company's interest in ICANN is for the security and stability of the Internet. I do not have any relationships or duties outside my company that would involve any issues of interest to or conflict with ICANN, and my duties in the GNSO. This statement of interest will be maintained at: http://www.icannwiki.org/Greg_Ruth_-_statement_of_interest ......................................................................... Tony Holmes - ISPCP Constituency I am employed within BT Group's Chief Technology Office with the responsibility for determining numbering, naming and addressing policy and strategy for BT Group PLC. BT is a large ISP and infrastructure provider and operates in many countries across the world. BT is also an accredited ICANN Registrar, but is not currently operational. I participate in, and hold official positions in a number of other technology focused technical and policy making bodies at both the national and international level, none of which cause conflict with my work in ICANN. I have no employment, contract, financial interest or other business relationship with ICANN, registries or registrars except BT. I am an elected representative of the ISP and Connectivity Providers Constituency to the GNSO. ....................................................................... ....................................................................... Non Commercial Users Constituency Robin Gross - Non Commercial Users Constituency I represent the Non-Commercial Users Constituency on the GNSO Policy Council. I am the Executive Director of IP Justice, an international civil liberties organization based in San Francisco. IP Justice is a California not-for-profit corporation and 501(c)(3). I am also licensed to practice law throughout California, and serve on the Board of Directors of the Union for the Public Domain, a not-for-profit corporation based in Washington DC. I teach international copyright law at Santa Clara University School of Law. From 1999-2002, I was an intellectual property attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. ...................................................................... Norbert Klein – Non-Commercial Users Constituency I am at present a consultant to a Cambodian non-government organization, the Open Forum of Cambodia, which was created in 1994 to facilitate and to foster communication – not only electronic communication – in the conflictive, post-civil war Cambodian society. My relation to the Internet, and since 1999 to ICANN, originated from the fact that I created in 1994 the first possibility for people in Cambodia to have access to e-mail, and in 1996 I created the possibility to have an e-mail address in Cambodia: .kh Neither I nor the Open Forum of Cambodia have registered a top level domain – we use a secondary domain for our organization, under the ccTLD of Cambodia, .kh For myself, I use a webmail account by the German provider GMX, a GMX ProMail account, for which I pay the normal set fees. Neither we as an organization, nor I as an individual, own or have in any other way an economic interest in any IT or ICT company or related holding. ........................................................................... Mawaki Chango - Non Commercial Users Constituency I am currently a full-time Ph.D. student and Graduate Assistant, and I represent the Non-Commercial Users Constituency on the GNSO Council. In addition, I am involved in social activism through my participation in ACSIS (African Civil Society for Information Society), as ICT policy advocator, and advisor to the ACSIS’ President. Over the last five years, I have been involved as a consultant with UNESCO, the International Development Research Centre, Open Society Initiative for West Africa (Dakar), the Eduardo Mondlane University (Maputo), and EvalNet (Johannesburg). I have never been involved in any business related to the distribution and operation of Internet resources. ...................................................................... ...................................................................... Intellectual Property Interests Constituency Ute Decker - Intellectual Property Interests Constituency I am full time employed as Deputy Director for Global Legal Policy by the IFPI Secretariat. I am also elected representative of the Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC) to the GNSO Council. The IFPI Secretariat is the head office of the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) representing the recording industry worldwide. IFPI is a non-commercial private sector non-governmental organisation, funded through membership contributions. IFPI is a member of the IPC. IFPI’s members are 1415 record companies, including EMI Music, Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Warner Music, and Universal Music and many independent record companies. The IFPI Secretariat provides services to its member and to 48 affiliated national recording industry bodies; and is responsible for co-ordinating international strategies in the key areas of the organisation's work: enforcement of copyright and trademarks, advice on technology and legal developments, relations with governments and national industry bodies, representation in international organisations, litigation, market research, and public relations. .................................................................... Kiyoshi I. Tsuru - Intellectual Property Interests Constituency I, the undersigned, Kiyoshi I. Tsuru am a partner with the law firm of BELLO, GALLARDO, MORALES Y TSURU, S.C., in Mexico City. I specialize in Intellectual Property matters. I serve as a member of the Advisory Committee of NIC Mexico, which is in turn a member of the ccNSO of ICANN. From time to time, I have served as outside counsel to NIC Mexico. I am the country manager for Mexico of the Business Software Alliance (BSA) and a WIPO Panelist regarding disputes between domain names and trademarks. ......................................................................... Kristina Rosette - Intellectual Property Interests Constituency I am employed as a Special Counsel by Covington & Burling LLP (“Covington”), a general practice law firm with over 600 lawyers in five offices in three countries. I am resident in Covington’s Washington, DC office and am a member of the District of Columbia bar. I specialize in Internet and trademark matters, and represent trademark owner clients in connection with such matters. Among my responsibilities, I develop and implement offensive and defensive domain name registration, Internet monitoring, and enforcement strategies; reclaim domain names through negotiation, arbitration (under the UDRP, .biz STOP, and .mobi Sunrise Challenge policies, thus far), and litigation; and advise clients on the use of keywords and sponsored links. In connection with advising firm clients of generally noteworthy trademark- or Internet-related developments, I have also provided information and updates on domain name system developments (e.g., posting of reports for public comment, announcements of new policies such as the Domain Name Transfer Policy, .eu Sunrise requirements). All such communications have been, and will continue to be, based solely on publicly available information and documents. From time to time, I register or acquire in my own name domain names for firm clients. I am currently the registrant of several domain names, both on behalf of firm clients and in an individual capacity. From time to time and as circumstances warrant, I have completed and submitted Whois Data Problem Reports on behalf of firm clients. Since 2004, I have been a member of the Registration Practice and DNS Administration Subcommittee of the International Trademark Association’s Internet Committee. I have determined that Covington does not represent ICANN and does not represent any clients in matters in which ICANN is an adverse party. Covington did represent the International Cooperative Alliance in connection with the formation and establishment of DotCooperation LLC, the .coop registry operator, but that matter has been closed for some time. I have also determined that Covington neither represents any gTLD or sTLD registry operator in matters relating to its capacity as a registry operator nor represents any client in matters adverse to such registry operators as registry operators. Based on the responses to my inquiries, Covington does not represent any ccTLD registry operator in its capacity as a registry operator nor does it represent any client in matters adverse to any ccTLD registry operators as registry operators. To the best of my knowledge, Covington does not represent any ICANN-accredited registrar in its capacity as a registrar nor does it represent any firm client in a matter adverse to a registrar as registrar. From time to time, Covington has represented firm clients in intellectual property matters adverse to registrars, and it is likely to do so periodically in the future. I have not been involved in such matters. It is possible that a firm client is an ICANN-accredited registrar, but, if so, Covington does not represent it in such matters. .......................................................................... .......................................................................... gTLD Registries constituency Cary Karp - gTLD Registries constituency I am Director of Internet Strategy and Technology at the Swedish Museum of Natural History (NRM), an agency of the Swedish government. This is a full-time salaried position. I serve in a similar capacity for the International Council of Museums (ICOM) of which I am an individual member and NRM is an institutional member. I receive a small additional honorarium for that activity. I hold a non-remunerated position as the President and CEO of the Museum Domain Management Association (MuseDoma), the Sponsoring Organization for the .museum TLD. NRM is the largest museum in Sweden and charged with advising private and corporate entities in that country in matters relating to its sphere of expertise. I am regularly involved in such action. Current activity includes a joint initiative with NIC-SE, the operator of the .se ccTLD, which is collaborating with NRM in a project in the context of the Swedish national "Year of Cultural Diversity 2006". I also advise NIC-SE in general matters relating to IDN. I may from time to time receive separate honoraria for advisory services provided as a result of my position at NRM, and may be similarly compensated for writing and speaking engagements. ICOM is an NGO maintaining formal relations with UNESCO and having consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council. I am directly involved in activity conducted by ICOM in its relationship with UNESCO. I represent MuseDoma in the gTLD Registry Constituency and am the elected representative for the sTLDs on the GNSO Council. I conduct no other activity with, and have no other interests of any kind that involve, entities maintaining business or contractual relationships with ICANN. ........................................................................ Chuck Gomes - gTLD Registries constituency 9 December 2006 I am Vice President of Policy and Compliance for VeriSign, Inc. VeriSign is the registry operator for the .com and the .net gTLDs and also provides backend registry services in support of Global Name Registry for the .name gTLD and Employ Media for the .jobs gTLD. VeriSign is also the registry operator for two ccTLDs, .cc for the Cocos and Keelings Islands and .tv for Tuvalu. As an employee who supports VeriSign’s naming services business, I do often have access to Registry Sensitive information including information about registrars. With regard to both our gTLD and ccTLD registration services businesses as well as other VeriSign businesses, our customers and business associates have interests in various ICANN policy issues and may be members of other GNSO constituencies and/or supporting organizations. In addition to registry agreements with ICANN for .com and .net, VeriSign also has obligations to the U.S. Department of Commerce through a cooperative agreement that was initiated in 1993 and has been amended many times since then. Those obligations include providing the A and J root servers as well as support to ICANN in implementing changes in the root zone file. As such, VeriSign is a member of the DNS Root Server System Advisory Committee and also works closely with IANA staff in the processing of root zone changes. As a representative elected to the GNSO Council by the unsponsored gTLD registry members of the gTLD Registry Constituency (RyC), I am required by the Constituency’s Articles of Operation to represent the views of those members and the full Constituency as applicable, not my own or VeriSign’s. In that regard, I will endeavor to always qualify any personal statements as such and will follow-up with the RyC to obtain their position. I own shares of VeriSign stock and hold options to purchase additional shares, but the amount of shares I currently own plus the potential shares I could possibly own if I exercised all options is a miniscule number relative to the total number of VeriSign shares. ....................................................................... Edmon Chung - gTLD Registries constituency December 22, 2006 I am currently serving as the CEO for DotAsia Organisation Ltd. DotAsia is the registry operator and sponsor for the ICANN Sponsored gTLD ".ASIA". DotAsia is a not-for-profit membership based organization incorporated in Hong Kong. The current members of DotAsia includes 20 ccTLDs (".AF", ".BT", ".CN", ".ID", ".IN", ".IR", ".JP", ".KH", ".KR", ".KZ", ".MN", ".MO", ".NU", ".NZ", ".PH", ".SG", ".TJ", ".TW", ".UZ" and ".VN") in the Asia community and 3 regional organisations: APNIC, APNG and PAN. APNIC is an RIR in the ICANN ASO. Prior to joining DotAsia, I was the Creative Director of Afilias Ltd. Afilias is the registry operator for the ICANN gTLD ".INFO". Afilias also provides registry services to other ICANN gTLDs, including ".ORG", ".AERO" and ".MOBI", as well as other ccTLDs including ".IN", ".AG", ".GI", ".SC", ".HN", ".BZ", ".VC", ".MN", ".LA", and ".SG". ............................................................................. ............................................................................. Nominating Committee appointees to the GNSO Council Sophia Bekele - Nominating Committee appointee to the GNSO Council I represent a California based, privately held company, CBS Enterprise Group, which is engaged in international business. As part of its portfolio of services, the company provides systems integration services through CBS International, which delivers domain registration, web hosting and email services to end users via a reseller, agreement with registrars. Less than 10% of CBS's business is derived from these services. In my personal capacity, I do not have any of my moneys, invested in companies that are in the registrar businesses. I do not believe that any activities of the Council or ICANN could have a material effect on the work I do at CBS International. .................................................................... Avri Doria - Nominating Committee appointee to the GNSO Council http://psg.com/~avri/icann-stmt-interest.html I am an independent research consultant and have no employment, contract, financial interest, share ownership or any other business relationship with ICANN, registries or registrars except as a holder, and fee payer, of several domain names in .com, .net and .org. As part of my volunteer activities I have spoken to and given advise to various representatives of indigenous nomadic and semi-nomadic populations on the topic of obtaining an TLD. ...................................................................... Jon Bing - Nominating Committee appointee to the GNSO Council 26 December 2006 I am a Professor at the Faculty of Law, University of Oslo, holding a chair in Computers and Law created 1988. I work within the Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law, (http://www.jus.uio.no/iri/english/index.html) an institution I co-funded in 1970. This makes me an old-timer within this area of law, consequently I also have broad research interests – an inheritance from the time one thought “computers and law” was a very narrow and esoteric field. I have worked extensively with legal information systems, text retrieval and knowledge based methods related to this. My interests in substantial law includes data protection (or privacy), intellectual property law applied to computer programs, databases, integrated circuits, and other material in machine-readable form, and media and communication law. I have in the past been member of the General Board of the Norwegian Research Council, and am currently chairing a research program on vulnerability and society within the NRC. I am a member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, doctor honoris causa of Stockholm and Copenhagen, a former Visiting Professor of King’s College (University of London), and have collected many embarrassing honorary prizes or titles. A sketchy home page may be found at http://www.jus.uio.no/iri/english/nrccl/people/associates/bing.html. The NRCCL is mainly financed by the state through the University budget, but accept external contracts. Among these are projects financed by the European Communities (though not a member of the EU, Norway participates on equal standing within the research co-operation), funds made available from the Ministry of Culture and Church Affairs (the funds are used to sponsor various activities related to copyright), and funds from NORID, which operates the Norwegian country domain .no. These latter funds are used for our research on Internet governance, which is taught in our international Master of Law and Information Communication Technology programme. This sponsorship has gone on from 2004, and English language anthology is expected to be published 2007. A set of ethical rules ensures the independence of the NRCCL from any outside source of funding. I have in the past been consultant to several international organisations; these include OCED (both ICCP and PUMA), the EU Commission, UNESCO, WIPO, and UNDP. I have also been Norwegian delegate to specialised functions within OECD, WIPO, European Cultural Fund and UNESCO. Currently I am member of the International Advisory Committee of the UNESCO Memory of the World Programme (ending 2007). Nationally, I have served within may administrative or legal functions related to culture, for instance chair of the Art Council, Film Council, Cassette Tax Foundation etc, member of the Royal Commissions of the Freedom of Expression (which lead to an amendment of the Constitution), The Royal Commission of Copyright, and the Commission on Converging Technologies. I currently chair the Data Protection Tribunal. I published my first collection of short-stories 1967, and with my fellow writer Tor Åge Bringsværd is often given the blame from having introduced science fiction to Norway. I have since them – under by own name or the joint by-line Bing & Bringsværd – published stories, novels, dramatic works for stage, television, and radio, and the libretti of four operas. I have translated a large number of fiction and non-fiction works (among them Bill Gates’ autobiography), and edited more than twenty science fiction anthologies. In Norway, I may be better known as an author than anything else. My next novel will be a juvenile scheduled for publication spring 2007. I have served as the legal advisor to creative writers in Norway 1970-90, which certainly has influenced my perspective with respect to intellectual property. Currently, I am partner in the law firm Bing & Co (http://www.bing.no/ ), which mainly has a “back-office” function with respect to other law firms, but also manages my somewhat extensive commercial lecturing. ............................................................................. Alan Greenberg - At Large Advisory Committee liaison to the GNSO Council Other than my ALAC and GNSO participation, I have neither a business relationship nor substantive any involvement with either ICANN or organizations significantly affected by decisions or recommendations made by ICANN or its constituent bodies. ................................................................................. Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat - ICANN gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Updated 2007 GNSO Council Statements of Interest
by GNSO.SECRETARIAT＠GNSO.ICANN.ORG Feb. 1, 2007

Feb. 1, 2007

[council[at]gnso.icann.org] Dear All, Please find the updated 2007 Statements of Interest for the GNSO Councillors. They are ordered according to constituencies: 1. Registrar Constituency 2. Commercial and Business Users Constituency 3. Internet Service Providers and Connectivity Providers Constituency 4. Non Commercial Users Constituency 5. Intellectual Property Interests Constituency 6. gTLD Registries constituency 7. Nominating Committee appointees to the GNSO Council Please let me know if there are any other updates you would like made. Thank you very much. Kind regards, Glen ...................................................................... Registrar Constituency Bruce Tonkin - Registrar Constituency - GNSO Council chair I am employed full-time as Chief Technology Officer by Melbourne IT Limited. Melbourne IT has a registrar accreditation agreement with ICANN. Melbourne IT also has a contractual relationship with most gtld registries (for a current list see http://www.icann.org/registrars/accredited-list.html) and many cctld registries as a registrar. .................................................................... Ross Rader - - Registrar Constituency I am the Director of Research and Innovation for Tucows Inc., an ICANN accredited registrar and Internet services vendor. Tucows is a minority shareholder in Afilias LLC, with roughly an 8% shareholding. Neither Tucows, nor I, is in possession of, nor have access to Registry Sensitive or Registry Proprietary information as defined by any relevant registry operating contracts as a result of this relationship. Tucows provides consulting and application hosting services to other registrars and Internet services providers. I am not an officer, director, consultant, or employee of any of these customer organizations nor am I specifically involved in providing services to them. The URL for this statement is: http://www.byte.org/blog/_WebPages/StatementofInterestsforRossRader.html ........................................................................ Thomas Keller - - Registrar Constituency I'm a full time employee of Schlund+Partner AG. Schlund+Partner AG is ICANN accredited and is conducting business with almost all major gTLDS and ccTLDs. Schlund holds a minority share in Afilias LLC for investment purposes.Besides domain name registrations Schlund is mainly offering webhosting and email services to end users. I'm a member of the DENIC Technical Advisory Council. ....................................................................... ....................................................................... Commercial and Business Users Constituency Philip Sheppard - Commercial and Business Users Constituency I am Public Affairs Manager for AIM - European Brands Association, a Brussels-based trade association involved in public affairs activities. AIM represents the branded goods industries in Europe on key issues which affect the ability of brand manufacturers to design, distribute and market their brands. AIM's membership groups 1800 companies of all sizes through corporate members and national associations in 21 countries. These companies are mostly active in every day consumer goods. AIM's mission is to create for brands an environment of fair and vigorous competition, fostering innovation and guaranteeing maximum value to consumers. I hold various non-remunerated directorships unrelated to ICANN. I am a contact point for several domain names. Honorary positions: - President 2007 International Public Relations Association (IPRA), the global professional association for the PR profession. - I am a Freeman of the City of London. ...................................................................... Mike Rodenbaugh - Commercial and Business Users Constituency I am employed full-time by Yahoo! Inc., as Senior Legal Director. I have been elected to the GNSO Council by the Commercial and Business Users Constituency. Yahoo! is a leading global Internet brand and one of the most trafficked Internet destinations worldwide. Yahoo!'s mission is to connect people to their passions, their communities, and the world's knowledge. I engage ICANN issues from Yahoo!'s perspective as a premier online brand and diversified business, highly valuing the perspectives of our customers, partners and users. Yahoo! has hundreds of thousands of online business customers and partners which advertise and provide services to our global audience. We are interested in seeing all of these businesses succeed and grow. These businesses work with Yahoo! because we have earned one of the world's largest audiences, requiring that the 'user perspective' remain extremely important to us always. And, of course Yahoo! is a famous brand that is extremely challenging to protect and enforce online, worldwide. I believe businesses of all types and sizes share our interest in the rapid growth of internet commerce, balanced with fair protection of existing property interests. I look forward to working with the Council to address the many serious issues that existing businesses encounter as a result of ICANN policy. ............................................................................ ISPCP Constituency Anthony Harris - ISPCP Constituency I am under contract as full time executive director of CABASE, a non-profit Internet industry association, incorporated as such in Argentina since 1999. - consulting work done for ICANN - NONE - consulting work done for a gtld or cctld registry, or current applicant to become a gtld or cctld registry - NONE - consulting work done for a registrar - NONE - employment with a registry or registrar - NONE .......................................................................... Greg Ruth - ISPCP Constituency I am a Senior Consultant for Verizon Business, a global communications, security and technology provider. My duties consist primarily of providing consulting services. As a multi-national organization, Verizon Business has many customer and vendor relationships, and some of those relationships may include ICANN accredited registrars, registries as well as members of other GNSO constituencies. In the normal course of my duties, I have no knowledge of which ICANN related organizations my company is contractually involved with. My position and responsibilities in Verizon Business do not allow me any decision making power, personal involvement, responsibility or other interest in determining or carrying out the contractual relationships in which my company enters. As a global network provider, my company's interest in ICANN is for the security and stability of the Internet. I do not have any relationships or duties outside my company that would involve any issues of interest to or conflict with ICANN, and my duties in the GNSO. This statement of interest will be maintained at: http://www.icannwiki.org/Greg_Ruth_-_statement_of_interest ......................................................................... Tony Holmes - ISPCP Constituency I am employed within BT Group's Chief Technology Office with the responsibility for determining numbering, naming and addressing policy and strategy for BT Group PLC. BT is a large ISP and infrastructure provider and operates in many countries across the world. BT is also an accredited ICANN Registrar, but is not currently operational. I participate in, and hold official positions in a number of other technology focused technical and policy making bodies at both the national and international level, none of which cause conflict with my work in ICANN. I have no employment, contract, financial interest or other business relationship with ICANN, registries or registrars except BT. I am an elected representative of the ISP and Connectivity Providers Constituency to the GNSO. ....................................................................... ....................................................................... Non Commercial Users Constituency Robin Gross - Non Commercial Users Constituency I represent the Non-Commercial Users Constituency on the GNSO Policy Council. I am the Executive Director of IP Justice, an international civil liberties organization based in San Francisco. IP Justice is a California not-for-profit corporation and 501(c)(3). I am also licensed to practice law throughout California, and serve on the Board of Directors of the Union for the Public Domain, a not-for-profit corporation based in Washington DC. I teach international copyright law at Santa Clara University School of Law. From 1999-2002, I was an intellectual property attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. ...................................................................... Norbert Klein – Non-Commercial Users Constituency I am at present a consultant to a Cambodian non-government organization, the Open Forum of Cambodia, which was created in 1994 to facilitate and to foster communication – not only electronic communication – in the conflictive, post-civil war Cambodian society. My relation to the Internet, and since 1999 to ICANN, originated from the fact that I created in 1994 the first possibility for people in Cambodia to have access to e-mail, and in 1996 I created the possibility to have an e-mail address in Cambodia: .kh Neither I nor the Open Forum of Cambodia have registered a top level domain – we use a secondary domain for our organization, under the ccTLD of Cambodia, .kh For myself, I use a webmail account by the German provider GMX, a GMX ProMail account, for which I pay the normal set fees. Neither we as an organization, nor I as an individual, own or have in any other way an economic interest in any IT or ICT company or related holding. ........................................................................... Mawaki Chango - Non Commercial Users Constituency I am currently a full-time Ph.D. student and Graduate Assistant, and I represent the Non-Commercial Users Constituency on the GNSO Council. In addition, I am involved in social activism through my participation in ACSIS (African Civil Society for Information Society), as ICT policy advocator, and advisor to the ACSIS’ President. Over the last five years, I have been involved as a consultant with UNESCO, the International Development Research Centre, Open Society Initiative for West Africa (Dakar), the Eduardo Mondlane University (Maputo), and EvalNet (Johannesburg). I have never been involved in any business related to the distribution and operation of Internet resources. ...................................................................... ...................................................................... Intellectual Property Interests Constituency Ute Decker - Intellectual Property Interests Constituency I am full time employed as Deputy Director for Global Legal Policy by the IFPI Secretariat. I am also elected representative of the Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC) to the GNSO Council. The IFPI Secretariat is the head office of the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) representing the recording industry worldwide. IFPI is a non-commercial private sector non-governmental organisation, funded through membership contributions. IFPI is a member of the IPC. IFPI’s members are 1415 record companies, including EMI Music, Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Warner Music, and Universal Music and many independent record companies. The IFPI Secretariat provides services to its member and to 48 affiliated national recording industry bodies; and is responsible for co-ordinating international strategies in the key areas of the organisation's work: enforcement of copyright and trademarks, advice on technology and legal developments, relations with governments and national industry bodies, representation in international organisations, litigation, market research, and public relations. .................................................................... Kiyoshi I. Tsuru - Intellectual Property Interests Constituency I, the undersigned, Kiyoshi I. Tsuru am a partner with the law firm of BELLO, GALLARDO, MORALES Y TSURU, S.C., in Mexico City. I specialize in Intellectual Property matters. I serve as a member of the Advisory Committee of NIC Mexico, which is in turn a member of the ccNSO of ICANN. From time to time, I have served as outside counsel to NIC Mexico. I am the country manager for Mexico of the Business Software Alliance (BSA) and a WIPO Panelist regarding disputes between domain names and trademarks. ......................................................................... Kristina Rosette - Intellectual Property Interests Constituency I am employed as a Special Counsel by Covington & Burling LLP (“Covington”), a general practice law firm with over 600 lawyers in five offices in three countries. I am resident in Covington’s Washington, DC office and am a member of the District of Columbia bar. I specialize in Internet and trademark matters, and represent trademark owner clients in connection with such matters. Among my responsibilities, I develop and implement offensive and defensive domain name registration, Internet monitoring, and enforcement strategies; reclaim domain names through negotiation, arbitration (under the UDRP, .biz STOP, and .mobi Sunrise Challenge policies, thus far), and litigation; and advise clients on the use of keywords and sponsored links. In connection with advising firm clients of generally noteworthy trademark- or Internet-related developments, I have also provided information and updates on domain name system developments (e.g., posting of reports for public comment, announcements of new policies such as the Domain Name Transfer Policy, .eu Sunrise requirements). All such communications have been, and will continue to be, based solely on publicly available information and documents. From time to time, I register or acquire in my own name domain names for firm clients. I am currently the registrant of several domain names, both on behalf of firm clients and in an individual capacity. From time to time and as circumstances warrant, I have completed and submitted Whois Data Problem Reports on behalf of firm clients. Since 2004, I have been a member of the Registration Practice and DNS Administration Subcommittee of the International Trademark Association’s Internet Committee. I have determined that Covington does not represent ICANN and does not represent any clients in matters in which ICANN is an adverse party. Covington did represent the International Cooperative Alliance in connection with the formation and establishment of DotCooperation LLC, the .coop registry operator, but that matter has been closed for some time. I have also determined that Covington neither represents any gTLD or sTLD registry operator in matters relating to its capacity as a registry operator nor represents any client in matters adverse to such registry operators as registry operators. Based on the responses to my inquiries, Covington does not represent any ccTLD registry operator in its capacity as a registry operator nor does it represent any client in matters adverse to any ccTLD registry operators as registry operators. To the best of my knowledge, Covington does not represent any ICANN-accredited registrar in its capacity as a registrar nor does it represent any firm client in a matter adverse to a registrar as registrar. From time to time, Covington has represented firm clients in intellectual property matters adverse to registrars, and it is likely to do so periodically in the future. I have not been involved in such matters. It is possible that a firm client is an ICANN-accredited registrar, but, if so, Covington does not represent it in such matters. .......................................................................... gTLD Registries constituency Cary Karp - gTLD Registries constituency I am Director of Internet Strategy and Technology at the Swedish Museum of Natural History (NRM), an agency of the Swedish government. This is a full-time salaried position. I serve in a similar capacity for the International Council of Museums (ICOM) of which I am an individual member and NRM is an institutional member. I receive a small additional honorarium for that activity. I hold a non-remunerated position as the President and CEO of the Museum Domain Management Association (MuseDoma), the Sponsoring Organization for the .museum TLD. NRM is the largest museum in Sweden and charged with advising private and corporate entities in that country in matters relating to its sphere of expertise. I am regularly involved in such action. Current activity includes a joint initiative with NIC-SE, the operator of the .se ccTLD, which is collaborating with NRM in a project in the context of the Swedish national "Year of Cultural Diversity 2006". I also advise NIC-SE in general matters relating to IDN. I may from time to time receive separate honoraria for advisory services provided as a result of my position at NRM, and may be similarly compensated for writing and speaking engagements. ICOM is an NGO maintaining formal relations with UNESCO and having consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council. I am directly involved in activity conducted by ICOM in its relationship with UNESCO. I represent MuseDoma in the gTLD Registry Constituency and am the elected representative for the sTLDs on the GNSO Council. I conduct no other activity with, and have no other interests of any kind that involve, entities maintaining business or contractual relationships with ICANN. ........................................................................ Chuck Gomes - gTLD Registries constituency 9 December 2006 I am Vice President of Policy and Compliance for VeriSign, Inc. VeriSign is the registry operator for the .com and the .net gTLDs and also provides backend registry services in support of Global Name Registry for the .name gTLD and Employ Media for the .jobs gTLD. VeriSign is also the registry operator for two ccTLDs, .cc for the Cocos and Keelings Islands and .tv for Tuvalu. As an employee who supports VeriSign’s naming services business, I do often have access to Registry Sensitive information including information about registrars. With regard to both our gTLD and ccTLD registration services businesses as well as other VeriSign businesses, our customers and business associates have interests in various ICANN policy issues and may be members of other GNSO constituencies and/or supporting organizations. In addition to registry agreements with ICANN for .com and .net, VeriSign also has obligations to the U.S. Department of Commerce through a cooperative agreement that was initiated in 1993 and has been amended many times since then. Those obligations include providing the A and J root servers as well as support to ICANN in implementing changes in the root zone file. As such, VeriSign is a member of the DNS Root Server System Advisory Committee and also works closely with IANA staff in the processing of root zone changes. As a representative elected to the GNSO Council by the unsponsored gTLD registry members of the gTLD Registry Constituency (RyC), I am required by the Constituency’s Articles of Operation to represent the views of those members and the full Constituency as applicable, not my own or VeriSign’s. In that regard, I will endeavor to always qualify any personal statements as such and will follow-up with the RyC to obtain their position. I own shares of VeriSign stock and hold options to purchase additional shares, but the amount of shares I currently own plus the potential shares I could possibly own if I exercised all options is a miniscule number relative to the total number of VeriSign shares. ....................................................................... Edmon Chung - gTLD Registries constituency December 22, 2006 I am currently serving as the CEO for DotAsia Organisation Ltd. DotAsia is the registry operator and sponsor for the ICANN Sponsored gTLD ".ASIA". DotAsia is a not-for-profit membership based organization incorporated in Hong Kong. The current members of DotAsia includes 20 ccTLDs (".AF", ".BT", ".CN", ".ID", ".IN", ".IR", ".JP", ".KH", ".KR", ".KZ", ".MN", ".MO", ".NU", ".NZ", ".PH", ".SG", ".TJ", ".TW", ".UZ" and ".VN") in the Asia community and 3 regional organisations: APNIC, APNG and PAN. APNIC is an RIR in the ICANN ASO. Prior to joining DotAsia, I was the Creative Director of Afilias Ltd. Afilias is the registry operator for the ICANN gTLD ".INFO". Afilias also provides registry services to other ICANN gTLDs, including ".ORG", ".AERO" and ".MOBI", as well as other ccTLDs including ".IN", ".AG", ".GI", ".SC", ".HN", ".BZ", ".VC", ".MN", ".LA", and ".SG". ............................................................................. ............................................................................. Nominating Committee appointees to the GNSO Council Sophia Bekele - Nominating Committee appointee to the GNSO Council I represent a California based, privately held company, CBS Enterprise Group, which is engaged in international business. As part of its portfolio of services, the company provides systems integration services through CBS International, which delivers domain registration, web hosting and email services to end users via a reseller, agreement with registrars. Less than 10% of CBS's business is derived from these services. In my personal capacity, I do not have any of my moneys, invested in companies that are in the registrar businesses. I do not believe that any activities of the Council or ICANN could have a material effect on the work I do at CBS International. .................................................................... Avri Doria - Nominating Committee appointee to the GNSO Council http://psg.com/~avri/icann-stmt-interest.html I am an independent research consultant and have no employment, contract, financial interest, share ownership or any other business relationship with ICANN, registries or registrars except as a holder, and fee payer, of several domain names in .com, .net and .org. As part of my volunteer activities I have spoken to and given advise to various representatives of indigenous nomadic and semi-nomadic populations on the topic of obtaining an TLD. ...................................................................... Jon Bing - Nominating Committee appointee to the GNSO Council 26 December 2006 I am a Professor at the Faculty of Law, University of Oslo, holding a chair in Computers and Law created 1988. I work within the Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law, (http://www.jus.uio.no/iri/english/index.html) an institution I co-funded in 1970. This makes me an old-timer within this area of law, consequently I also have broad research interests – an inheritance from the time one thought “computers and law” was a very narrow and esoteric field. I have worked extensively with legal information systems, text retrieval and knowledge based methods related to this. My interests in substantial law includes data protection (or privacy), intellectual property law applied to computer programs, databases, integrated circuits, and other material in machine-readable form, and media and communication law. I have in the past been member of the General Board of the Norwegian Research Council, and am currently chairing a research program on vulnerability and society within the NRC. I am a member of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, doctor honoris causa of Stockholm and Copenhagen, a former Visiting Professor of King’s College (University of London), and have collected many embarrassing honorary prizes or titles. A sketchy home page may be found at http://www.jus.uio.no/iri/english/nrccl/people/associates/bing.html. The NRCCL is mainly financed by the state through the University budget, but accept external contracts. Among these are projects financed by the European Communities (though not a member of the EU, Norway participates on equal standing within the research co-operation), funds made available from the Ministry of Culture and Church Affairs (the funds are used to sponsor various activities related to copyright), and funds from NORID, which operates the Norwegian country domain .no. These latter funds are used for our research on Internet governance, which is taught in our international Master of Law and Information Communication Technology programme. This sponsorship has gone on from 2004, and English language anthology is expected to be published 2007. A set of ethical rules ensures the independence of the NRCCL from any outside source of funding. I have in the past been consultant to several international organisations; these include OCED (both ICCP and PUMA), the EU Commission, UNESCO, WIPO, and UNDP. I have also been Norwegian delegate to specialised functions within OECD, WIPO, European Cultural Fund and UNESCO. Currently I am member of the International Advisory Committee of the UNESCO Memory of the World Programme (ending 2007). Nationally, I have served within may administrative or legal functions related to culture, for instance chair of the Art Council, Film Council, Cassette Tax Foundation etc, member of the Royal Commissions of the Freedom of Expression (which lead to an amendment of the Constitution), The Royal Commission of Copyright, and the Commission on Converging Technologies. I currently chair the Data Protection Tribunal. I published my first collection of short-stories 1967, and with my fellow writer Tor Åge Bringsværd is often given the blame from having introduced science fiction to Norway. I have since them – under by own name or the joint by-line Bing & Bringsværd – published stories, novels, dramatic works for stage, television, and radio, and the libretti of four operas. I have translated a large number of fiction and non-fiction works (among them Bill Gates’ autobiography), and edited more than twenty science fiction anthologies. In Norway, I may be better known as an author than anything else. My next novel will be a juvenile scheduled for publication spring 2007. I have served as the legal advisor to creative writers in Norway 1970-90, which certainly has influenced my perspective with respect to intellectual property. Currently, I am partner in the law firm Bing & Co (http://www.bing.no/ ), which mainly has a “back-office” function with respect to other law firms, but also manages my somewhat extensive commercial lecturing. ............................................................................. Alan Greenberg - At Large Advisory Committee liaison to the GNSO Council Other than my ALAC and GNSO participation, I have neither a business relationship nor substantive any involvement with either ICANN or organizations significantly affected by decisions or recommendations made by ICANN or its constituent bodies. ................................................................................. -- Glen de Saint Géry ICANN glen[at]icann.org http://www.icann.org -- Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat - ICANN gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

2 1