October 2009 - council - lists.icann.org

Rights Protection workshop - in Crystal B starting now
by Bruce Tonkin Oct. 28, 2009

Oct. 28, 2009

Hello All, Attached is the presentation that Kurt Pritz is currently presenting on rights protection, prior to the panel discussion. Regards Bruce

1 0

Jaime Wagner Statement of Interest
by Glen de Saint Géry Oct. 28, 2009

Oct. 28, 2009

Forwarded From: Jaime Wagner I am currently CEO of Plug In Internet S/A, a private ISP focusing on hosting and data center operations. Recently Plug In merged its operations with UOL, a listed company and the largest and most diversified ISP in Brazil. UOL eventually may act as a registrar, but this is an insignificant part of its business. I am also a Director at Internetsul, an ISPs association in Brazil. I was also elected by all seven Brazilian ISPs associations to represent them in CGI.br, brazilian Internet Steering Committee. I hold official positions in a number of other private sector associations in Brazil, none of which has any conflict with my work in ICANN. I have no employment, contract, financial interest or other business relationship with ICANN. I have no other activity that could have any connection with my position as elected representative of the ISP and Connectivity Providers Constituency to the GNSO. Jaime Wagner

1 0

FW: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Feedback requested - PDP-WT face to face meeting
by Glen de Saint Géry Oct. 28, 2009

Oct. 28, 2009

Forwarded On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff Just for clarification (and please post to the Council list), the Work Team meeting is not being planned until all of the deadlines on the STI work are to have expired. Thanks. Jeffrey J. Neuman Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy ________________________________ The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp(a)icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 10:07 AM To: 'Marika Konings'; 'Gnso-ppsc-pdp(a)icann.org'; GNSO Council Subject: RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Feedback requested - PDP-WT face to face meeting I copy the Council list, as we need to begin prioritizing all the various work before us, immediately. In my view, this Work Team meeting should not be planned unless the Council decides it is a bigger priority for a face to face meeting than all of our other priorities, in particular the STI response to the Board, the RAP-WG, the RAA drafting team, etc. Mike Rodenbaugh RODENBAUGH LAW 548 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 738-8087<http://service.ringcentral.com/ringme/callback.asp?mbid=57178438,0,&referer…> http://rodenbaugh.com<http://rodenbaugh.com/> From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp(a)icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 4:43 PM To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp(a)icann.org Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Feedback requested - PDP-WT face to face meeting Dear All, As discussed during our meeting, in order to move the proposal for a face to face meeting forward, I'll be developing a workplan outlining the objectives and expected deliverables of such a meeting in order to obtain internal approval. As discussed, the idea would be to provide travel funding for one active WT representative from each constituency / stakeholdergroup or AC/SO. Remote participation will be arranged for those that will not be able to attend in person. To move this forward and complete this plan, I would like to request the following information: 1. In order to determine the most appropriate and cost-effective meeting venue and have an indication of the number of participants that will require funding, could you please send me the name of the proposed funded representative from your constituency / stakeholdergroup / AC/SO and the location from where this person will be travelling 2. Please complete the following doodle (see http://www.doodle.com/u6ta33ik4r5mk52g) so we can try to find a meeting date that is most convenient to all. Please note that the idea is to have a 1,5 - 2 day meeting. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Best regards, Marika

1 0

RE: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Feedback requested - PDP-WT face to face meeting
by Mike Rodenbaugh Oct. 28, 2009

Oct. 28, 2009

I copy the Council list, as we need to begin prioritizing all the various work before us, immediately. In my view, this Work Team meeting should not be planned unless the Council decides it is a bigger priority for a face to face meeting than all of our other priorities, in particular the STI response to the Board, the RAP-WG, the RAA drafting team, etc. Mike Rodenbaugh RODENBAUGH LAW 548 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94104 <http://service.ringcentral.com/ringme/callback.asp?mbid=57178438,0,&referer =http://rodenbaugh.com/contact> (415) 738-8087 <http://rodenbaugh.com/> http://rodenbaugh.com From: owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp(a)icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-ppsc-pdp@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 4:43 PM To: Gnso-ppsc-pdp(a)icann.org Subject: [gnso-ppsc-pdp] Feedback requested - PDP-WT face to face meeting Dear All, As discussed during our meeting, in order to move the proposal for a face to face meeting forward, I'll be developing a workplan outlining the objectives and expected deliverables of such a meeting in order to obtain internal approval. As discussed, the idea would be to provide travel funding for one active WT representative from each constituency / stakeholdergroup or AC/SO. Remote participation will be arranged for those that will not be able to attend in person. To move this forward and complete this plan, I would like to request the following information: 1. In order to determine the most appropriate and cost-effective meeting venue and have an indication of the number of participants that will require funding, could you please send me the name of the proposed funded representative from your constituency / stakeholdergroup / AC/SO and the location from where this person will be travelling 2. Please complete the following doodle (see http://www.doodle.com/u6ta33ik4r5mk52g) so we can try to find a meeting date that is most convenient to all. Please note that the idea is to have a 1,5 - 2 day meeting. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Best regards, Marika

1 0

RE: [council] GNSO Council meeting Wednesday 28 October at 8:00
by Tim Ruiz Oct. 27, 2009

Oct. 27, 2009

> There will be a continental breakfast for the Councillors Glen, you are the best! Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [council] GNSO Council meeting Wednesday 28 October at 8:00 From: Glen_de_Saint_Géry <Glen(a)icann.org> Date: Tue, October 27, 2009 3:13 am To: Council GNSO <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Dear All, Reminder about the GNSO Council meeting tomorrow at 8 am local time in Crystal A on level 2. There will be a continental breakfast for the Councillors behind the screen as you walk in the door on the left from 7 am onwards. Please see the updated agenda with all the links to the documents at http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-28oct09-en.htm The motions are posted on page: https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?28_oct_motions To date all councilors are present except for David Taylor, IPC who will not be participating remotely. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

2 1

Proposed Friendly Amendment to Motion for the Response to ICANN Board letter to GNSO Council
by Rosette, Kristina Oct. 27, 2009

Oct. 27, 2009

All, I would like to propose the following friendly amendment to the motion for the response to ICANN Board letter to GNSO Council that Adrian proposed and Tim seconded: "The assistance of members of the Implementation Recommendation Team ("IRT") in answering questions about the IP Clearinghouse and Uniform Rapid Suspension System recommendations may be useful in the drafting process. The GNSO Council requests that those members of the IRT who worked on those recommendations be available to answer any such questions that may arise, and encourages the GNSO Review Team to avail itself of this resource." I have set forth below a revised proposed motion that includes the friendly amendment as the second and third sentences of #4. -*- WHEREAS, the ICANN Board has requested that the GNSO evaluate certain ICANN staff implementation proposals for the protection of trademarks in new gTLDs based in part on the recommendations from the Implementation Recommendation Team ("IRT"), public comments, and additional analysis undertaken by ICANN Staff, as described in the letter dated 12 October 2009 <<Letter from Rod Beckstrom & Peter Dengate Thrush to GNSO Council <http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/beckstrom-to-gnso-council-12oct09- en.pdf> >>. WHEREAS, the ICANN Board letter requests the GNSO's view by December 14, 2009 on whether certain rights protection mechanisms for second level strings recommended by ICANN Staff based on public input are consistent with the GNSO's proposed policy on the introduction of new gTLDs, and are the appropriate and effective options for achieving the GNSO's stated principles and objectives; WHEREAS, the GNSO has reviewed the ICANN Board letter and desires to approve the procedures for conducting such evaluation; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the GNSO adopts the following process to conduct the evaluation requested by the Board: 1. A GNSO Review Team will be comprised of representatives designated as follows: the Registrar and Registry Stakeholder Groups with two (2) representatives each, the Commercial Stakeholder Groups and the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Groups with four (4) representatives each, and At-Large with two (2) representatives and one representative from the Nominating Committee Appointees(1); 2. Each of the Stakeholder Groups will solicit from their members their initial position statements on the questions and issues raised by the ICANN Board letter and the ICANN Staff proposed models for the implementation of the Trademark Clearinghouse and Uniform Rapid Suspension model, and will deliver their initial position statements on November 4, and with final position statements to be delivered by November 6, 2009; 3. Such position statements will be summarized by ICANN Staff and distributed to the GNSO Review Team to evaluate whether a consensus can be reached on the ICANN Staff implementation models or other proposals for the protection of trademarks in the New gTLD Program; 4. The GNSO Review Team will conduct its analysis, identify those areas where consensus has already been reached, and seek to develop consensus on those issues for which consensus could not be determined. The assistance of members of the IRT in answering questions about the IP Clearinghouse and Uniform Rapid Suspension System recommendations may be useful to this work. The GNSO Council requests that members of the IRT who worked on those recommendations be available to answer any such questions that may arise, and encourages the GNSO Review Team to avail itself of this resource; and 5. The GNSO Review Team will provide a final report to the GNSO on or before the GNSO Council's meeting in late November, 2009. -*- K

4 3

by Glen de Saint Géry Oct. 27, 2009

Oct. 27, 2009

Seoul GNSO Council Public Meeting Agenda - 28 October 2009 http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-28oct09-en.htm Agenda published on the Wiki https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?agenda_28_oct_2009 See motions: https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?28_oct_motions Proposed GNSO Council Public Meeting Agenda, Seoul, 28 October 2009 This agenda was established according to the Rules of Procedure for the GNSO Council Coordinated Universal Time 23:00 UTC Tuesday 27 October - see below for local times. Local time Seoul 08:00 (16:00 Los Angeles, 19:00 Washington DC, 23:00 London, Tuesday 27 October, 00:00 Brussels, 10:00 Melbourne Wednesday 28 October) Avri Doria and the new chair will be chairing the GNSO Council meeting. Scheduled time for meeting 08:00 -12:30. Remote participation details sent individually to Council members . Item 1: Administrative Items (08:00- 08:15) 1.1 Roll call of Council members 1.2 Update any statements of interest 1.3 Review/amend agenda Item 2: Vote on revised Council Operating Procedure (8:15-8:45) GNSO Council operating procedures http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-operating-procedures-24sep09-en.pdf http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-operating-procedures-24sep09-en.doc .Presentation by Chair of OSC or Council Operations WT Chair GNSO Council Operating Procedures .Q/A and discussion .Vote - see motion https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?28_oct_motions Item 3: Election of new Council Chair (8:45 - 9:30) .Vote on motions (if any) on holding the election by means of a secret ballot. https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?28_oct_motions .Public Statement by candidates .Q/A .First round vote + activation of absentee ballot for 24 hours if necessary .Second round vote if first vote is complete (i.e. no need for absentee ballot on first vote) and 60% of both houses is not reached for any candidate/none of the above option. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If a new chair is elected, the provisional chair will step down and the newly elected chair will chair the rest of the meeting. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Item 4: IANA Business Excellence initiative - Leo Vegoda (9:30 - 9:45) .http://sel.icann.org/meetings/seoul2009/presentation-iana-business-excellence-28oct09-en.pdf Item 5: Whois Studies (9:45 - 10:30) .Reference documents: RFP announcement for WHOIS misuse studies: http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-28sep09-en.htm The GNSO Council Motion in Mexico City, March 2009 04 March 2009 motions http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/index.html#200903 Motion on WHOIS Service Tools 07 May 2009 motions http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/index.html#200905 ICANN Board Resolution regarding display and usage of internationalized registration data, approved in Sydney, 26 June 2009 http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-26jun09.htm#6 Internationalized Data Registration Working Group charter http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/internationalized-data-registration-wg-draft-c… RFP announcement for WHOIS Registrant Identification Studies http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-23oct09-en.htm .Presentations Whois Studies Update Progress Report on Whois Service Requirement Study .Open Discussion .Next steps/vote if appropriate (1030 - 1100 Break) Item 6: Board letter to the GNSO Council regarding IRT proposals (11:00 - 11:45) Letter from Rod Beckstrom & Peter Dengate Thrush to GNSO Council http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/beckstrom-to-gnso-council-12oct09-en.p… .Presentation and Background .Open Discussion .Plan* Item 7: Open Mike (11:45 - 12:15) Item 8: Thank Yous (12:15 - 12:30) Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

2 1

GNSO Council meeting Wednesday 28 October at 8:00
by Glen de Saint Géry Oct. 27, 2009

Oct. 27, 2009

Dear All, Reminder about the GNSO Council meeting tomorrow at 8 am local time in Crystal A on level 2. There will be a continental breakfast for the Councillors behind the screen as you walk in the door on the left from 7 am onwards. Please see the updated agenda with all the links to the documents at http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-28oct09-en.htm The motions are posted on page: https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?28_oct_motions To date all councilors are present except for David Taylor, IPC who will not be participating remotely. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

3 2

Re: [gnso-sti] Meeting Details for STI Review Team on Thursday Evening
by Alan Greenberg Oct. 27, 2009

Oct. 27, 2009

The 2nd At-large rep will be Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com>. Alan At 27/10/2009 02:19 AM, Margie Milam wrote: >As a reminder, each of the Stakeholder Groups should identify their >representatives to the Review Team in accordance with the proposed >motion that will be voted upon at the GNSO Council meeting on Wednesday.

1 0

Motion to Adopt Updated Council Operating Procedures
by Rosette, Kristina Oct. 27, 2009

Oct. 27, 2009

All, It is my understanding from our discussion yesterday that we had rough consensus on voting to adopt the updated Council Operating Procedures, but to state in the motion that certain areas remain outstanding (e.g., abstentions) and to require that those areas be priority work to be completed by a date certain. Two questions: 1. Is that correct? 2. What areas, other than abstentions, remain outstanding? I'll start drafting a substitute motion once I've heard back from enough of you so that I'm comfortable I'm on the right track. K

4 4