July 2009 - council - lists.icann.org

ICANN Board agenda - 30 July 2009
by Bruce Tonkin July 24, 2009

July 24, 2009

From: http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/agenda-30jul09.htm Board Meeting - Agenda 30 July 2009 1. Consent Agenda: a. From the Board Finance Committee -- Endorsing investment policy & adopting minor amendments b. From the Board Governance Committee i. Conflicts of Interest Policy - approval ii. Nominating Committee Member from Research & Academia - Confirmation c. From the Structural Improvements Committee i. Nominating Committee Review Working Group: Approval of the proposed composition ii. ccNSO Review: Approval to publish RFP for hiring an external consultant iii. Systematization of Organizational Review processes: Adoption of Proposal d. Response to Ombudsman Recommendations Main Board Meeting - For Action and Discussion: 2. From the Structural Improvements Committee regarding GNSO Improvements a. Stakeholder Group Charters b. Board Seats 13 & 14 c. New Constituencies d. Changes to Bylaws 3. IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process - keeping on track for launch just after Seoul 4. New gTLDS - Remaining Open Issues 5. JPA Progress Report - plan going forward 6. IGF Planning - Current Strategy 7. President & CEO's Report Updates 8. DNSSEC Implementation 9. Root scalability study update 10. At-Large Board Seats 11. Document Deadline Policy for ICANN International Meetings from Public Participation Committee 12. Other Business

1 0

MP3 recording GNSO Council teleconference, Thursday, 23 July 2009
by Glen de Saint Géry July 23, 2009

July 23, 2009

[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org [To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org] Please find the MP3 recording of the GNSO Council teleconference, held on Thursday, 23 July, 2009 at: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-council-20090723.mp3 http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#july Happy listening! Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

GNSO Council Resolutions 23 July 2009
by Glen de Saint Géry July 23, 2009

July 23, 2009

Dear Councillors, Ahead of the official Council minutes, the following resolutions were approved at the GNSO Council meeting on 23 July 2009. Thank you. Kind regards Glen 1. Motion for Approval of a Charter for the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part B Working Group (WG) ========================================================================================== Proposed by Tim Ruiz, seconded by Chuck Gomes. Whereas On 24 June 2009 the GNSO Council initiated PDP IRTP Part B and, decided to create a PDP WG for the purposes of fulfilling the requirements of the PDP; and, The GNSO Council has reviewed the charter. Resolved The GSNO Council approves the charter and appoints Tim Ruiz confirmed as the GNSO Council Liaison to the IRTP PDP Part B WG. The GNSO council further directs that the work of the IRTP Part B WG be initiated no later then 14 days after the approval of this motion. Until such time as the WG can select a chair and that chair can be confirmed by the GNSO Council, the GNSO council Liaison shall act as interim chair. Charter The Working Group shall consider the following questions as outlined in the issues report and make recommendations to the GNSO Council: a) Whether a process for urgent return/resolution of a domain name should be developed, as discussed within the SSAC hijacking report (http://www.icann.org/announcements/hijacking-report-12jul05.pdf) see also (http://www.icann.org/correspondence/cole-to-tonkin-14mar05.htm) b) Whether additional provisions on undoing inappropriate transfers are needed, especially with regard to disputes between a Registrant and Admin Contact (AC). The policy is clear that the Registrant can overrule the AC, but how this is implemented is currently at the discretion of the registrar; c) Whether special provisions are needed for a change of registrant when it occurs near the time of a change of registrar. The policy does not currently deal with change of registrant, which often figures in hijacking cases; d) Whether standards or best practices should be implemented regarding use of a Registrar Lock status (e.g. when it may/may not, should/should not be applied); e) Whether, and if so, how best to clarify denial reason #7: A domain name was already in 'lock status' provided that the Registrar provides a readily accessible and reasonable means for the Registered Name Holder to remove the lock status. To inform its work, the WG should pursue the availability of further information from ICANN compliance Staff to understand how elements of the existing Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy that are applicable to the above questions are enforced. The WG should also request compliance Staff to review any policy recommendations it develops and provide advice on how the recommendations may best be structured to ensure clarity and enforceability. Working Group processes: While the development of Guidelines for Working Group operations are still to be developed the guidelines at the following link will apply to this WG: working group process https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?24_june_09_motions Milestones WG formed, chair & Council liaison & staff coordinator identified = T Initial Report: T + 170 days" First comment period ends: T + 190 days Preliminary Final Report: T + 220 days. Note: If the WG decides that a change is needed to the milestone dates, it should submit a revised time line to the GNSO council for approval The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote Philip Sheppard, Mike Rodenbaugh, Zahid Jamil (CBUC), Cyril Chua (IPC), Tony Harris, Tony Holmes (ISP), William Drake (NCUC), Avri Doria, Olga Cavalli, Terry Davis (NCA) (one vote each) Tim Ruiz, Stéphane van Gelder, (RC) Edmon Chung, Jordi Iparraguirre, Edmon Chung (RyC) (two votes each) Absent Councillors: Ute Decker, Kristina Rosette (IPC), Greg Ruth (ISP), Mary Wong, Carlos Souza (NCUC), Adrian Kinderis (RC). 2. Motion for the formation of the Joint ccNSO-GNSO IDN Working Group (JIG): ============================================================================ Proposed by Edmon Chung, seconded by Chuck Gomes WHEREAS GNSO IDN WG successfully completed its outcomes report in March 2007 and the GNSO Council approved the incorporation of its findings in the GNSO Final Report on the Introduction of New gTLDs in September 2007, describing policy requirements for the introduction of IDN gTLDs; The Board Proposal from the IDNC WG was completed in June 2008, describing the IDN ccTLD Fast Track methodology; Both the drafts and excerpts for the Applicant Guidebook for the New gTLD process, and the drafts for the IDN ccTLD Fast Track Implementation Plan had included implementation considerations for IDN TLDs; and, Issues of common interest between new IDN ccTLDs and new IDN gTLDs can be identified, including issues where implementation of IDN ccTLDs and IDN gTLDs should be consistent (e.g. IDN Language Table implementation at the root zone), and where implementation of IDN ccTLDs and IDN gTLDs are inter-related (e.g. 2-Character length TLDs as a reservation for ccTLDs); RESOLVED: To initiate together with the ccNSO a Joint ccNSO-GNSO IDN Working Group (JIG) based on the Draft Charter: http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/jig-charter-21jul09.pdf The motion was approved unanimously by voice vote Philip Sheppard, Mike Rodenbaugh, Zahid Jamil (CBUC), Cyril Chua (IPC), Tony Harris, Tony Holmes (ISP), William Drake (NCUC), Avri Doria, Olga Cavalli, Terry Davis (NCA) (one vote each) Tim Ruiz, Stéphane van Gelder, (RC) Edmon Chung, Jordi Iparraguirre, Edmon Chung (RyC) (two votes each) Absent Councillors: Ute Decker, Kristina Rosette (IPC), Greg Ruth (ISP), Mary Wong, Carlos Souza (NCUC), Adrian Kinderis (RC). Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

OSC Report for Council Mtg on 23 Jul 09
by Gomes, Chuck July 23, 2009

July 23, 2009

OSC Report for Council 23 Jul 09 GNSO Council Operations WT (GCOT) * SOI/DOI documents in ICANN staff legal review * Council Rules of Procedure: Working on Quorum and Voting language requirements * In Progress: Have identified next areas of work for Rules of Procedure. GNSO Constituency/SG Operations WT (CSG WT) * Feedback deadline from constituencies regarding a toolkit of in kind services for constituencies and SGs is the end of July. * Feedback was obtained from most constituencies in Sydney regarding the idea of a database of constituency/SG members and contacts. * Constituency and SG charters are being analyzed to identify best practices. Communications WT * A comprehensive document of Business Requirements for GNSO Replacement Website was produced with lots of support from ICANN web design experts that has been sent to the OSC members for review and comment. * Information regarding other tasks the WT is performing is expected shortly. Chuck

1 0

FW: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] For final review - Fast Flux Final Report
by Mike Rodenbaugh July 23, 2009

July 23, 2009

Below is the latest from the FF-WG. We are getting very near completion. I am happy to answer any questions on our Council call today. Thanks, Mike Mike Rodenbaugh Rodenbaugh Law 548 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94104 +1.415.738.8087 www.rodenbaugh.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08(a)icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:29 AM To: Fast Flux Workgroup Subject: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] For final review - Fast Flux Final Report Dear All, An updated version of the Draft Fast Flux Final Report has been posted on the wiki (https://st.icann.org/pdp-wg-ff/index.cgi?fast_flux_pdp_wg) incorporating edits and suggestions made by Dave, Joe and James (Thanks!). Please note that I have accepted all the changes in the previous version so it is easier to review the changes made in this version of the report. Do note that there are still some comments in the report, especially in chapter 8 and 9 that will need to be addressed on the next call, coming Wednesday 29 July at 14.30 UTC. If you have any suggestions on how to address these comments by providing suggested language, please share this with the list. Best regards, Marika

1 0

FW: RAPWG GNSO Council update for July 23
by Mike Rodenbaugh July 23, 2009

July 23, 2009

Below is an update from the Chair of the RAP-WG, fyi. I'm happy to try to answer any questions during our Council call today. Thanks, Mike Mike Rodenbaugh Rodenbaugh Law 548 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94104 +1.415.738.8087 www.rodenbaugh.com -----Original Message----- From: Greg Aaron [mailto:gaaron@afilias.info] Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 2:33 PM To: 'Mike Rodenbaugh' Subject: RAPWG GNSO Council update for July 23 Dear Mike: I hear there is a Council meeting tomorrow. If a RAPWG update is needed, I suggest: * Since Sydney, the group has discussed four areas: Cybersquatting, Malware/Botnet Control, Name Spinning, and Contract Uniformity. Cybersquatting, Malware/Botnet Control, and Contract Uniformity have been assigned to subgroups of volunteers, who are responsible for developing background data and statements, which will become sections of the WG's Initial Report. Wikis have been set up so that each subgroup can develop its content. * The group has been discussing whether or not it should, because of past GNSO efforts and the six WHOIS study questions that were recently commissioned, leave WHOIS off its list of registration abuses for major examination. There is currently discussion of whether the group should include WHOIS proxy contact issues as a topic for examination. When it is ready, the group plans to send a note to Council about its discussions re: WHOIS. * As work on the above topics proceeds, the RAPWG is moving on to examine others; next on the list is front-running. A full list of topics for upcoming discussion is in the latest "RAPWG Abuse Categories and Types" document at: https://st.icann.org/reg-abuse-wg/index.cgi?registration_abuse_policies_work ing_group * The RAPWG's chair has reminded the group that it owes the Council updates as to its schedule outlook. As it is unclear which or how many topics the group will ultimately write about, the group has not yet settled on a date for issuing an Initial Report. Further discussion of scheduling will take place. All best, --Greg ********************************** Greg Aaron Director, Key Account Management and Domain Security Afilias vox: +1.215.706.5700 x104 fax: 1.215.706.5701 gaaron(a)afilias.info ********************************** The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

1 0

RE: [council] Proposed GNSO Council Agenda 23 July 2009
by Tim Ruiz July 23, 2009

July 23, 2009

Kristina, Tucows raised an issue about ensuring that whatever policy recommendations came out of the IRTP Part B WG that they first involve Counsel and/or Compliance Staff to be sure that they are structured so as to unambiguous and enforceable. So the vote on the charter was put off to address that. The change to the chart is the addition of this paragraph: To inform its work, the WG should pursue the availability of further information from ICANN compliance Staff to understand how elements of the existing Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy that are applicable to the above questions are enforced. The WG should also request compliance Staff to review any policy recommendations it develops and provide advice on how the recommendations may best be structured to ensure clarity and enforceability. Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: [council] Proposed GNSO Council Agenda 23 July 2009 From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette(a)cov.com> Date: Tue, July 21, 2009 8:47 am To: "Council GNSO" <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Tim, Has the IRTP Part B Motion changed since Sydney? If so, would you please identify the changes? If not, I thought we had deferred voting on it because of concerns raised by some registrars about the drafting/scope. Have those concerns been otherwise addressed? Thanks. K -----Original Message----- From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Glen de Saint Géry Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 1:49 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Proposed GNSO Council Agenda 23 July 2009 Proposed GNSO Council Agenda 23 July 2009 http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-23jul09.shtml Wiki Reference: https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?agenda_23_july_2009 This agenda was established according to the Rules of Procedure for the GNSO Council Coordinated Universal Time 16:00 UTC - see below for local times (09:00 Los Angeles, 12:00 Washington DC, 17:00 London, 18:00 Brussels, 02:00 Melbourne next day) Avri Doria will be chairing the GNSO Council meeting Scheduled time for meeting 120 mins. Dial-in numbers sent individually to Council members. Item 0: Roll call of Council members Item 1: Update any statements of interest Item 2: Review/amend agenda Item 3: Approve GNSO Council minutes (Items 1-3 15 mins.) GNSO Council minutes 28 May 2009 GNSO Council minutes 9 July 2009 Item 4: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part B Charter Motion see motion on Wiki https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?23_july_motions Item 5: Joint ccNSO-GNSO IDN Working Group (JIG) Draft Charter Draft Charter http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/jig-charter-16jul09.pdf see motion on Wiki https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?23_july_motions Item 6: Initial Discussion - developing a GNSO Policy Strategy for 2010 Item 7: Status Updates (20 mins) 7. 1. Board Update Adopted Resolutions 26 June 2009 7. 2. ccNSO Liaison update 7. 3. Geographical Region WG update 7. 4. Joint AC/SO Efforts 7. 4 . 1. IDNG Working Group update IDNG Draft Charter http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/idng-wg-charter-16jul09.pdf 7. 4. 2. RAA with ALAC 7. 5 Policy Items 7. 5. 1. Working Groups 7. 5. 1. 1. Fast Flux 7. 5. 1. 2. Registration Abuse Policies Working Group (RAPWG) 7. 5. 1. 3. Post-Expiry Domain Name Recovery Working Group 7. 6. Drafting Teams 7. 6. 1. Travel Policy Drafting Team - Travel Preparation for Seoul 7. 7. GNSO Improvement Work Teams 7. 7. 1. Policy Process Steering Committee (PPSC) Policy Development Process (PDP) work team (WT) 7. 7. 2. PPSC Working Group work team WGWT 7. 7. 3. Operations Steering Committee (OSC) Communications coordination work team 7. 7. 4. OSC Constituency operations work team 7. 7. 5. OSC GNSO Council operations work team 7. 8. Restructuring effort 7. 8. 1. Status of By-Law amendments 7. 8. 2. Stakeholder Group Charters 7. 8. 3. Constituency Charters 7. 9. Countdown to Seoul - Schedule check Item 8: AOB - Action Items (09:00 Los Angeles, 12:00 Washington DC, 17:00 London, 18:00 Brussels, 02:00 Melbourne next day) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Local time between March and October, Summer in the NORTHERN hemisphere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 16:00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- California, USA (PDT) UTC-7+1DST 09:00 New York/Washington DC, USA (EDT) UTC-4+1DST 12:00 Buenos Aires, Argentina UTC-3+0DST 13:00 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil UTC-3+0DST 13:00 London, United Kingdom (BST) UTC+1DST 17:00 Brussels, Belgium (CEST) UTC+1+1DST 18:00 Paris, France (CEST) UTC+1+1DST 18:00 Barcelona, Spain (CEST) UTC+1+1DST 18:00 Karachi, Pakistan UTC+5+0DST 22:00 Hong Kong, China UTC+8+0DST 00:00 Singapore, Singapore UTC+8+0DST 00:00 Melbourne, Australia (EST) UTC+10+0DST 02:00 (Friday) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The DST starts/ends on last Sunday of October 2009, 2:00 or 3:00 local time (with exceptions) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Motions for today's meeting.
by Avri Doria July 23, 2009

July 23, 2009

Hi, There are two motions for today, other then minutes approval etc, found at: https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?23_july_motions To those who submitted the motions, please insure that the language on the wiki is the latest. thanks a.

1 0

with reference to Agenda item 6: Initial discussion - developing a GNSO Policy Strategy for 2010.
by Avri Doria July 23, 2009

July 23, 2009

Hi, People may have noticed this item in the agenda, without much explanation. Here is some background. My thought is get the conversation started on how the GNSO and the GNSO Council develop the required Policy Strategy. In suggesting this, I am not suggesting that the current council should determine the future strategy or the priorities within that strategy. Rather I am proposing that it is time for the constituencies (past, present and interest groups) and community to start developing the ground work so that the new Council, once seated can begin to focus on Policy work. I quite specifically did not call this bluesky, because we did one of those a year ago, and I still shutter at the enormity, complexity and randomness of the list we derived. Rather I think this council needs to figure out how to get the process started in the community. The question might come as to why start now? I have several reasons for thinking it may be time to start: - It has been on our todo list for a long time, I just kept putting it off until the major council tasks in the restructuring and reorganization were done. I think we are almost there now. - the BCG recommendations approved by the Board included this in the initial tasks as can be seen in some of the quotes I have included from the REPORT OF THE BOARD GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE GNSO REVIEW WORKING GROUP ON GNSO IMPROVEMENTS. Another issue may concern the legitimacy of this council, that is nearing the end of its term, setting the agenda for future policy work work. I tend to see the effort more as one that set the stage with a way to organize, the constituencies, the candidate constituencies and the community and start gathering the information needed to start discussion in earnest in Seoul and continue thereafter. thanks a. Some Background info from REPORT OF THE BOARD GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE GNSO REVIEW WORKING GROUP ON GNSO IMPROVEMENTS. 2.2.1 LSE Review Recommendation 9. Develop and publish annually a two-year GNSO Policy Development Plan that dovetails with ICANN’s budget and strategic planning. Page 24 It would also be helpful for the PDP process to align better with ICANN’s strategic plan and operations plan, as was proposed in LSE Rec. #9. Recommendation #9 suggested that the GNSO publish annually a “Policy Development Plan” for current and upcoming work. Indeed, it is important across the entire ICANN community that projects and resource allocations are better aligned with strategic objectives. ICANN has a well developed planning process, with a three year Strategic Plan that is reviewed and updated annually and an annual Operating Plan. As the GNSO Council’s policy development work is such a critical part of ICANN’s function, it is important that there be a strong nexus between the work plan of the GNSO Council and the ICANN planning process. We therefore recommend that the Council, GNSO constituencies and staff execute, within six months, a more formal “Policy Development Plan” that is linked to ICANN’s overall strategic plan, but at the same time is sufficiently flexible to accommodate changes in priority determined by rapid evolution in the DNS marketplace and unexpected initiatives (e.g., the use of a wildcard by a Registry). Page 26 The PDP should be better aligned with ICANN’s strategic plan and operations plan. A formal Policy Development Plan should be linked to ICANN’s overall strategic plan, but at the same time should be sufficiently flexible to accommodate changes in priority determined by rapid evolution in the DNS marketplace and unexpected initiatives. Page 26 (i) The Council, constituencies and staff to execute, within six months, a more formal “Policy Development Plan” that is linked to ICANN’s overall strategic plan, but at the same time is sufficiently flexible to accommodate changes in priority (establishing the above-described implementation team for that purpose); and 27 (ii) Staff to propose, within six months, metrics that can bring the PDP more in sync with ICANN’s planning. Page 27 Third, the amount of time and energy that the Council has devoted to task forces, whether in terms of establishing them, overseeing their work, or debating their conclusions, has left insufficient time for the Council to focus on what is perhaps its most important function – setting the overall strategy for managing policy development by the GNSO Council. Page 30 In addition, the Council could analyze trends and changes in the gTLD arena and, as a consequence, provide advice on the use of ICANN resources affecting the gTLD name space. The Council could begin a constructive dialogue with a broad range of Internet stakeholders in order to fully understand DNS-related technologies, trends, and markets. This knowledge can help the Council set the appropriate strategic vision and direction for gTLD policy development, as well as coordinate the process in a meaningful way. Given that there is significant expertise reflected among the GNSO constituencies, the constituencies should also be invited to participate and contribute to the Council’s overall analysis of trends and changes in the gTLD arena Page 37 Proposed Action Item: The Board requests: (i) The Council and constituencies to participate fully in the ICANN planning process, including providing a three year view (for the Strategic Plan) and an annual plan

1 0

GNSO Stakeholder Group Charters public comment period extended to 23 July 2009
by Glen de Saint Géry July 22, 2009

July 22, 2009

[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org [To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org] [To: regional-liaisons[at]icann.org] Reminder: Extension of Public Comment Period on GNSO Stakeholder Group Charters to 23 July 2009 http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#stakeholder Explanation: As part of the comprehensive GNSO Improvements effort, last year the ICANN Board approved the formation of four new GNSO Stakeholder Groups (SGs). After considering proposed SG Charters that were submitted by the community and posted for public comment, the ICANN Board passed a Resolution in May directing its Structural Improvements Committee (SIC) and ICANN Staff to revise the SG Charters to make them consistent with the Board's GNSO Improvements Report (and related Resolutions). Stakeholder Groups are integral elements of a new, restructured GNSO, and are intended to be lightweight "caucuses" bringing together like-minded international groups (Constituencies) to elect the best representatives to fill the SG's allotted Council seats. Stakeholder Groups ensure that the ratio of Council seats among SGs remains the same while encouraging the formation of new Constituencies and the continued growth and diversification of the GNSO community. The overall GNSO Improvements effort and the role SGs will play in that arena is more fully described in the Stakeholder Group section of the GNSO Improvements Information Web Page. The SIC provided the community with the revised charters listed below and discussed these documents during ICANN's recent Sydney meeting. The revised charters are posted here to further encourage public comment through 21 July 2009. Commercial SG Charter [PDF, 29K] Non-Commercial SG Charter [PDF, 59K] Registrars SG Charter [PDF, 60K] Registries SG Charter [PDF, 117K] Staff Responsible: Robert Hoggarth Deadline and How to Submit Comments: The SIC is opening a 21-day public consultation forum, from 30 June 2009 through 21 July 2009, and invites community comments on the revised SG charters. To submit comments: Comments on the documents are welcome via email to gnso-stakeholder-charters(a)icann.org. To view comments: An archive of all comments received will be publicly posted at http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-stakeholder-charters/ The public announcement of this forum can be viewed http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-01jul09-en.htm Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0