council

Download

council@icann.org

July 2009

21 participants
62 discussions

Call for volunteers for Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery - PDP Working Group
by Glen de Saint Géry July 1, 2009

July 1, 2009

Dear All, The GNSO Council at its meeting on 24 June 2009 passed a resolution on Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery - PDP Working Group Charter http://gnso.icann.org/issues/post-expiration-recovery/pednr-wg-charter-24ju… Each constituency, and the liaisons, are invited to provide names of expected participants who can then be added to the WG mailing list. Other stakeholders and experts may be invited to join the WG by the GNSO Council. Community members who wish to be invited to join the group should contact the GNSO secretariat <gnso.secretariat[at]icann.org> and the invitations will be reviewed by the GNSO council. The GNSO Council RESOLVES To form a Working Group composed of Constituency representatives as well as interested stakeholders in order to develop potential policy and/or best practices to address the issues covered, while seeking additional information as appropriate to inform the work. The WG will also be open to invited experts and to members or representatives of the ICANN Advisory Committees, whether acting in their own right or as representatives of their AC. The Working Group initially shall: 1. Pursue the availability of further information from ICANN compliance staff to understand how current RAA provisions and consensus policies regarding deletion, auto-renewal, and recovery of domain names following expiration are enforced; 2. Review and understand the current domain name life cycle; 3. Review current registrar practices regarding domain name expiration, renewal, and post-expiration recovery. The Working Group shall then consider the following questions: 1. Whether adequate opportunity exists for registrants to redeem their expired domain names; 2. Whether expiration-related provisions in typical registration agreements are clear and conspicuous enough; 3. Whether adequate notice exists to alert registrants of upcoming expirations; 4. Whether additional measures need to be implemented to indicate that once a domain name enters the Auto-Renew Grace Period, it has expired (e.g., hold status, a notice on the site with a link to information on how to renew, or other options to be determined); 5. Whether to allow the transfer of a domain name during the RGP. The Working Group is expected to organize an issue update / workshop at the Seoul meeting, in addition to an update to the GNSO Council. The Working Group should consider recommendations for best practices as well as or instead of recommendations for Consensus Policy. Working Group processes: All WG meetings will be recorded and all recordings will be available to the public. A PEDNR WG mailing list has been created (gnso-pednr-dt(a)icann.org) with public archives at:http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-pednr-dt/. A SocialText wiki has been provided for WG usage and can be found athttps://st.icann.org/post-expiration-dn-recovery-wg/index.cgi?post_expira… Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

by Gomes, Chuck July 1, 2009

July 1, 2009

Note the following announcement posted on ICANN's site yesterday: Community Comment Invited on Proposed Bylaw Amendments Related to Restructuring of the GNSO Council at http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-30jun09-en.htm <blocked::http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-30jun09-en. htm> . The comment period runs through 29 July 2009 (30 days). Also note that the proposed amendments include 'additional draft Staff recommendations' beyond the changes proposed by the 'GNSO Council Restructure Drafting Team': "The package consists of three documents. The first document is a comparison document <blocked::http://www.icann.org/en/general/proposed-gnso-council-bylaws-a mendment-redline-30jun09-en.pdf> [PDF, 122K] showing the existing Bylaws and comparing them to the amendments proposed by the GNSO Council deliberations so far. The second document is a clean version <blocked::http://www.icann.org/en/general/proposed-gnso-council-bylaws-a mendment-clean-30jun09-en.pdf> [PDF, 67K] of what the Bylaws would look like if those amendments were approved. The third document is a Staff list of additional amendment components <blocked::http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/draft-staff-recommendati ons-30jun09-en.pdf> [PDF, 17K] that have been necessitated by community discussion at the ICANN Sydney meeting and suggestions from the Board's Structural Improvements Committee." Regarding the two open issues in the Bylaw amendments: * "The appointment of the additional three seats beyond the three seats currently allocated to the Non-Commercial Users Constituency are initially to be determined in accordance with the NCSG charter, which grants the Board the right to appoint individuals representing additional non-commercial interests." * For Board seats 13 and 14, the following was inserted in the proposed amendments: "placeholder regarding manner of selection - TBD by Board". Chuck

1 0