August 2009 - council - lists.icann.org

Public Comment: Geographic Regions Initial Report
by Glen de Saint Géry Aug. 4, 2009

Aug. 4, 2009

[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org [To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org] [To: regional-liaisons[at]icann.org] http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-31jul09-en.htm Public Comment: Geographic Regions Initial Report 31 July 2009 The Initial Report of the community-wide working group reviewing ICANN's Geographic Regions is now available for public comment. All members of the ICANN community are now invited to review that document (http://www.icann.org/en/topics/geographic-regions/initial-report-geo-region… [PDF, 100K]) and share comments and observations with the community through 4 September 2009. Background: Geographic diversity is a fundamental component of the ICANN organization. The ICANN Bylaws (Article VI Section 5) currently define five geographic regions as Africa, North America, Latin America/Caribbean, Asia/Australia/Pacific and Europe. The ICANN Geographic Regions were originally created to ensure regional diversity in the composition of the ICANN Board and were subsequently expanded in various ways to apply to the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO), At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) and the Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO). An ICANN Board resolution in 2000 directed Staff to assign countries to geographic regions on the basis of the United Nations Statistics Division's current classifications, and introduced the concept of "citizenship" in relation to the definition of ICANN Geographic Regions. Over time, the ccNSO has developed concerns about the implementation of the ICANN Geographic Regions and related representational issues. The ccNSO Council approved a resolution in 2007 recommending that the ICANN Board appoint a community-wide working group to further study and review the issues related to the definition of the ICANN Geographic Regions, to consult with all stakeholders and submit proposals to the Board to resolve the issues relating to the current definition of the ICANN Geographic Regions. The Board determined at its meeting in Los Angeles on 2 November 2007, that because any potential change to ICANN Geographic Regions could have widespread effect in ICANN, the views of other Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees should be sought by the Board. The Board asked the ICANN community, including the GNSO, ccNSO, the Address Supporting Organization (ASO), GAC, and ALAC, to provide the ICANN Staff with input on the ccNSO Council's resolution relating to ICANN's Geographic Regions - including the proposal to appoint a community-wide working group to review the structure of ICANN's present Geographic Regions and related issues, as suggested by the ccNSO. The community supported the concept of the working group and the Board authorized its formation at its December 2008 Meeting (see - http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-07nov08.htm#_Toc87682556) Explanation: The Board approved the Charter of the working group at its public meeting in Sydney Australia (see - http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-26jun09.htm#1.2) Copies of the Charter, in all six UN languages, are posted in the Public Comment Forum Box (see - http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-200909.html#geo-regio…) The Charter authorized by the Board outlines a three-part process in which the working group first prepares an Initial Report outlining the current applications of ICANN's geographic regions in various ICANN structures and processes and confirming the issues to be addressed by the working group during its deliberations. That Initial Report is the document being posted today. According to the Charter, the Initial Report will be followed by an "Intermediate Report", currently scheduled to be drafted and prepared by the October 2009 Seoul ICANN meeting. A third "Final Report" that will include the working group's recommendations (if any) is currently scheduled to be published early next year. Relevant Board Resolution, Bylaws and Background Documents: ICANN Bylaws Article VI, Section 5: http://www.icann.org/en/general/bylaws.htm - VI-5 ICANN Geographical Regions - Final Report by the ccNSO Regions Working Group For Submission to the ICANN Board: http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/ccnso-final-report-regions-wg-240907.p… [PDF, 122K] Geographic Regions Review Working Group Charter: http://www.icann.org/en/topics/geographic-regions/charter-26jun09-en.htm The Process From Here: At the end of this public comment forum period, the ICANN Staff will provide a summary/analysis of the comments submitted regarding the proposed charter document. That summary/analysis will be shared with the community and the Working Group. The Working Group will review the community input on the Initial Report to guide its deliberations and future work on the Intermediate Report and Final Report documents. Deadline and How to Submit Comments: The Staff is opening a 35-day public consultation forum, from 31 July 2009 through 4 September 2009, and invites community comments on this topic. The formal Public Comment Forum Box is located here: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-200909.html#geo-regio… To submit comments: geo-regions-review(a)icann.org To view comments: http://forum.icann.org/lists/geo-regions-review/ Staff Responsible: Robert Hoggarth Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

New gTLD Program: Update on Independent Evaluators Search
by Glen de Saint Géry Aug. 4, 2009

Aug. 4, 2009

[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org [To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org] [To: regional-liaisons[at]icann.org] http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-31jul09-en.htm New gTLD Program: Update on Independent Evaluators Search 31 July 2009 ICANN is reopening the Expressions of Interest (EOI) period for independent evaluators to perform key roles in reviewing applications for new generic top-level domains, scheduled to launch in 2010. The new Expressions of Interest period opens on 31 July, 2009 and closes on 15 September, 2009 at 23:59 UTC. The evaluation areas needed are: Applicant Evaluation Teams (Technical and Financial Evaluation) Geographic Name Evaluation String Similarity Examiners Community Priority Evaluation Panel -- formerly the Comparative Evaluation Panel Below are the links for the extension of the posted Expression of Interest which contain the criteria for each panel: http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-02apr09-en.htm ICANN is pleased to report that during the initial open search period (25 February, 2009 to 11 June, 2009) it received expressions of interest from nine, well-qualified candidates interested in serving as independent evaluators. ICANN would like to acknowledge and thank those respondents listed below. ICANN continues to engage in further discussions with the current candidates and will shortly hold an "EOI responders conference" limited to the firms that responded by the original due date of June 11, 2009. The outcome of this conference will be shared with the public and used to better inform potential new candidates. The existing candidates will also be able to update their proposals based on this interaction. The decision to reopen the search period has been made to accommodate the internal requirement to build a robust and scalable operations process with primary and secondary service providers as well as to eliminate the appearance of conflict in the evaluation process. The Independent Evaluators are expected to be identified by ICANN in Q4, 2009. Responding Organizations Deloitte + Laga - Belgium Fulcrum Inquiry - USA GeoLang Ltd - United Kingdom InterConnect Communications - United Kingdom JAS Communications LLC - USA KPMG LLP - USA Novak Druce + Quigg LLP - USA TAEUS International Corporation - USA Talal Abu Ghazaleh Organization - Information Technology International (TAGITI) - Jordan For further questions regarding this process please email: eval-eoi(a)icann.org. Related Resources: New gTLD Program: http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtld-program.htm Previous call for expressions of interest open submissions period: http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-02apr09-en.htm and http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-25feb09-en.htm Requirements for the different evaluation roles: (Please note; new Costs Template Exhibit A, attached to rear of original EOI) Evaluation Teams (Technical and Financial Evaluation): http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/eoi-app-eval-31jul09-en.pdf [PDF, 172K] Geographic Name Evaluation: http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/eoi-geo-names-31jul09-en.pdf [PDF, 184K] String Similarity Examiners: http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/eoi-string-sim-31jul09-en.pdf [PDF, 176K] Comparative Evaluation Panel: http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/eoi-commun-priority-31jul09-en.pdf [PDF, 176K] Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Public Comment: Proposed Bylaw Amendments Related to GNSO Restructuring (Version 2)
by Glen de Saint Géry Aug. 4, 2009

Aug. 4, 2009

Dear All, Please take the time to comment and note the 21-day public consultation forum, from 3 August 2009 through 24 August 2009. http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-03aug09-en.htm Public Comment: Proposed Bylaw Amendments Related to GNSO Restructuring (Version 2) 3 August 2009 Implementation of the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Improvements process requires the amendment of a substantial number of the ICANN Bylaws to reflect new GNSO structures, processes and mechanisms. Today, a packaged set of draft Bylaws and additional Staff recommendations (Version 2) is being posted for Public review and comment so that the ICANN Board can move forward with Bylaw amendments as soon as practicable. Approving the Bylaws amendments is a key step toward seating a newly structured GNSO Council at the ICANN meeting in Seoul, Korea this coming October as directed by the ICANN Board. Background and Explanation: An initial set of Bylaws amendments (Version 1) was posted for public comment on 30 June 2009, reflecting the work product of a GNSO Council Restructure Drafting Team (consisting of the entire GNSO Council and additional GNSO community members), and additional Staff recommendations. The Bylaw Amendments-Version 2 being posted today for public comment [PDF, 256K] are based upon the 30 June 2009 initial version, and include additional amendments that reflect guidance received from the Board's Structural Improvements Committee (SIC), and from the Board at its July meeting. In addition, Staff proposes additional amendments to enable the Bylaws to be internally consistent, and to conform to the principles of the GNSO Restructuring Report approved by the Board. In June 2008, the Board of Directors endorsed a series of recommendations on how to improve the GNSO's structures and operations. For the past year the community has been engaged in substantial discussions regarding various components of the recommendations including development of a new Policy development process, creation of a new Working Group Model for policy development, the restructuring of the GNSO Council and a variety of other process and mechanism changes designed to increase participation in the GNSO's work efforts. Relevant Board Resolution, Bylaws and Constituency Submissions: GNSO Improvements Information Page - http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/ GNSO Improvements Report adopted by ICANN's Board (3 February 2008): http://www.icann.org/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-improvements-report-03fe… Report To ICANN Board From Working Group on GNSO Council Restructuring (WG-GCR Report), 25 July 2008: http://www.icann.org/en/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-council-restructuring… Minutes of the Special Meeting of the ICANN Board of Directors, 28 August 2008: http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/minutes-28aug08.htm Minutes of the Special Meeting of the ICANN Board of Directors, 1 October 2008; http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/minutes-01oct08.htm Preliminary Report from the Special Meeting of the ICANN Board of Directors, 11 December 2008; http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/prelim-report-2-11dec08.htm Minutes of the Special Meeting of the ICANN Board of Directors, 23 April 2009; http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/minutes-23apr09.htm Minutes of the Special Meeting of the ICANN Board of Directors, 21 May 2009; http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/minutes-21may09.htm Resolution of the Regular Meeting of the ICANN Board of Directors, 26 June 2009: http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-26jun09.htm#2 Preliminary Report of the Special Meeting of the ICANN Board of Directors, 30 July 2009: http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/prelim-report-30jul09.htm The Process from Here: At the end of this Public Comment Forum period, ICANN Staff will review the comments submitted regarding Version 2, and revise the Bylaws as appropriate. ICANN Staff expects to present this revised set of Bylaws Amendments to the Board for approval at its next meeting (27 August 2009), to allow the new GNSO Council to be seated by Seoul. It should be noted that the GNSO Improvements Report approved by the Board in June 2008 has additional guidelines and recommendations for the ongoing practices and processes of GNSO constituencies. It is expected that this work -- particularly with respect to a new Policy Development Process, creation of a new Working Group Model and development of a new set of GNSO Council Operation Rules and Procedures - will be ongoing as part of the GNSO Improvements implementation efforts. As a result, additional Bylaws Amendments will be necessary to implement the outcome of these GNSO work teams. Deadline and How to Submit Comments: The Staff is opening a 21-day public consultation forum, from 3 August 2009 through 24 August 2009, and invites community comments on this matter. The formal Public Comment Forum Box is located here: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-200908.html#gnso-rest…. To submit comments: gnso-council-draft2(a)icann.org To view comments: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-council-draft2/ Staff Responsible: Robert Hoggarth Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Preliminary Report of ICANN Board meeting - 30 July 2009
by Bruce Tonkin Aug. 3, 2009

Aug. 3, 2009

Hello All, Below are the minutes of the Board meeting held last week. The key decisions with respect to the GNSO were: - approval of GNSO Stakeholder group charters (B 1 (a)) - approval of process for selecting ICANN Board seats 13 and 14 (B 1(b)) (note I abstained from the discussion and voting on that issue - although this is not stated in the preliminary minutes) - approval of single 15-working-day document deadline before an ICANN meeting No decision was made with respect to new constituencies or bylaw changes. Regards, Bruce Tonkin From: http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/prelim-report-30jul09.htm Preliminary Report of Special Board Meeting 30 July 2009 [Formal Minutes are still to be approved by the ICANN Board] Note: This has not been approved by the Board and does not constitute minutes but does provide a preliminary attempt setting forth the unapproved reporting of the resolutions from that meeting. Details on voting and abstentions will be provided in the Board's Minutes, when approved by the board at a future meeting. A Special Meeting of the ICANN Board of Directors was held via teleconference 30 July 2009 @ 19.00 UTC. Chairman Peter Dengate Thrush promptly called the meeting to order. In addition to Chairman Peter Dengate Thrush the following Directors participated in all or part of the meeting: Rod Beckstrom (President and CEO), Roberto Gaetano (Vice Chairman), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Raimundo Beca, Steve Crocker, Steven Goldstein, Dennis Jennings, Rita Rodin Johnston, Raymond A. Plzak, Mike Silber, Jean-Jacques Subrenat, Bruce Tonkin, and Katim Touray. The following Board Liaisons participated in all or part of the meeting: Janis Karklins, GAC Liaison; Ram Mohan, SSAC Liaison; Thomas Narten, IETF Liaison; Thomas Roessler, TLG Liaison; Wendy Seltzer, ALAC Liaison; and Suzanne Woolf, RSSAC Liaison. Rajasekhar Ramaraj was not present for the meeting. This is a preliminary report of the approved resolutions resulting from the Special Meeting of the ICANN Board of Directors, which took place on 30 July 2009 A. Consent Agenda 1. Board Finance Committee – Amended Investment Policy Whereas, ICANN adopted its Investment Policy in November 2007. Whereas, the Board Finance Committee requested that an outside expert review the Investment Policy to ensure it is appropriate for ICANN. Whereas, the outside expert completed a review of the ICANN Investment Policy and concluded that overall the Investment Policy is consistent with best practices of other similar organizations. Whereas, the outside expert recommended that minor modifications of the Investment Policy be made to ensure that it is as strong as possible. It is hereby resolved (2009.30.07.01) that the Board endorses the ICANN Investment Policy and adopts the minor amendments to the Investment Policy. 2. From the Board Governance Committee a. BGC Recommendation for Adoption of revised Conflicts of Interest Policy Whereas the Board adopted the current Conflicts of Interest Policy on 4 March 1999; Whereas the Board Governance Committee (BGC) reviewed and revised the Conflict of Interest (COI) Policy; Whereas the COI Policy was posted for a 30 day public comment period; Whereas the BGC considered the public comments received and made a few additional revisions; and Whereas the BGC recommends that the Board adopt the revised COI Policy. It is hereby resolved (2009.30.07.02) that the revised Conflicts of Interest Policy is approved. b. Approval of Board Governance Committee Recommendation for Academia & Research Representative for 2010 Nominating Committee Whereas, Section I.I of the Board Governance Committee charter directs the committee to recommend to the Board a nominee for the Academia and Research representative on the Nominating Committee, Whereas, Professor Jan Gruntorád was selected and approved by the Board in July 2008 as the Academia and Research representative on the Nominating Committee for 2009, Whereas, Professor Jan Gruntorád has agreed to serve as the Academia and Research representative on the Nominating Committee for 2010, Whereas, the Board Governance support this nomination and recommends that the Board select and approve Professor Jan Gruntorád as the Academia and Research representative on the Nominating Committee for 2010, Resolved (2009.30.07.03), the Board selects Professor Jan Gruntorád as the Academia and Research representative to the 2010 Nominating Committee. 3. From the Structural Improvements Committee a. Approval of Structural Improvements Committee Recommendation on Composition of the NomCom Review Working Group Whereas Article IV of ICANN Bylaws, Section 4 calls for periodic reviews of the key structures of ICANN; Whereas the Structural Improvements Committee has the duty to oversight ICANN’s organizational review processes through the engagement of external reviewers, and is authorized to ‘Create and populate Working Groups for each of the Reviews’; Whereas the Structural Improvements Committee considers that the work of the previously established NomCom review Working Group needs updating as to produce a report for public consultation; Whereas the Structural Improvements Committee voted the following composition of the NomCom Review updating Working Group: Thomas Roessler (Chair), Alejandro Pisanty, Jonathan Cohen, Steve Goldstein; and all nominated Members accepted to serve in this role; Resolved (2009.30.07.04), the composition of the NomCom Review updating Working Group as voted by the Structural Improvements Committee is hereby approved. b. Structural Improvements Committee Recommendation to direct staff to publish a Request for Proposal for the hiring of an external consultant for the Organizational Review of the ccNSO Whereas Article IV of ICANN Bylaws, Section 4 states that ‘The Board shall cause a periodic review (…) of the performance and operation of each Supporting Organization, each Supporting Organization Council, each Advisory Committee (other than the Governmental Advisory Committee), and the Nominating Committee by an entity or entities independent of the organization under review’; Whereas the Structural Improvements Committee has unanimously approved and submitted to the Board for approval the draft Request for Proposal (RfP) of the first independent review of the ICANN’s Country Code Names Supporting Organization, containing Terms of Reference and Instructions to Bidders; Whereas the RfP was previously published for public comments for a period of 30 days, as directed by the Board, and no comments were received; It is hereby resolved (2009.30.07.05) that the Request for Proposal (RfP) of the first independent review of the ICANN’s Country Code Names Supporting Organization is approved by the Board; It is hereby resolved (2009.30.07.06) that the Request for Proposal (RfP) of the first independent review of the ICANN’s Country Code Names Supporting Organization be posted and advertised for soliciting applications from independent consultants. c. Structural Improvements Committee Recommendation for Adoption of the Paper on the Systematization of Organizational Review Processes Whereas Article IV of ICANN Bylaws, Section 4 calls for periodic reviews of the key structures of ICANN; Whereas the Structural Improvements Committee has the duty of ‘[r]eviewing, and suggesting changes as warranted to, ICANN’s policies and processes governing organizational review’; Whereas the Structural Improvements Committee, based on lessons learned during the present phase of the first cycle of organizational reviews of key structures of ICANN, has reviewed the present Organizational Review processes and considers that these processes can be rationalized in order to achieve greater effectiveness and efficiency while increasing the accountability and transparency of ICANN; Whereas, as directed by the Board, the attached paper entitled ‘Proposals for the Systematization of ICANN’s Organizational Review Processes’ was previously published for public comments for a period of 30 days and no comments were received suggesting changes to its terms; and Whereas, at its 15 July 2009 meeting, the Structural Improvements Committee has unanimously approved the adoption of the proposals outlined in the papers, and a recommendation to the Board to adopt the proposals and direct staff to move towards implementation. It is hereby resolved (2009.07.30.07) that the proposals set forth in the paper entitled ‘Proposals for the Systematization of ICANN’s Organizational Review Processes’ are adopted by ICANN. 4. Review of Ombudsman Reports and Recommendations to the Board Whereas, the Ombudsman has made recommendations to the Board of Directors following certain investigations conducted by the Ombudsman; Whereas, the Board thanks the Ombudsman for his continuing service to ICANN; Whereas, the Board has reviewed the Ombudsman’s recommendations to the Board; and Whereas, the Board acknowledges that most of the Ombudsman’s recommendations have already been addressed. It is hereby resolved (2009.07.30. 08) that as soon as practicable, Staff shall provide the Ombudsman with Board approved responses to the Ombudsman’s outstanding recommendations. Resolutions 2009-07-30-01; 2009-07-30-02; 2009-07-30-03; 2009-07-30-04; 2009-07-30-05; 2009-07-30-06; 2009-07-30-07; 2009-07-30-08 were approved in a single vote approving the consent agenda items. All Board Members present unanimously approved these resolution. B. Regular Agenda B 1. From the Structural Improvements Committee regarding GNSO Improvements B 1(a) Stakeholder Group Charters ================================= The Board discussed the public comments received regarding the proposed Stakeholder Group Charter for the Non Commercial Stakeholder Group and the opposition raised by some of the members of the current Non Commercial Users Constituency, and discussed the need to clearly state that the period of time for which the transitional charter will remain in effect and that, upon reevaluation after the transitional period, the Board will reevaluate in full, including but not limited to the continued need for a constituency-based model. The Board received an update from Staff regarding the necessity for all proposed charters to be approved together to allow for the GNSO to move forward and seat the new council in Seoul. The Board then took the following action: Whereas, the Board determined at its May 2009 meeting that most of the New GNSO Stakeholder Group Charters required revisions to ensure equitable participation and representation by new Constituencies and alignment with the Board-approved GNSO Improvements Report; Whereas, the Board’s Structural Improvements Committee (SIC) developed, posted, and discussed with the community revised SG Charter documents; Whereas, the Staff has made further administrative and substantive edits to conform the documents with the SIC’s intention s, to address additional community comments and to resolve various, non-substantive typographical, form and style changes; It is RESOLVED (2009.30.07.09), the Board approves each of the Charters of the Registries Stakeholder Group, The Registrars Stakeholder Group, The Commercial Stakeholder Group and the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group as revised by the Structural Improvements Committee (copies of which accompany this resolution). The Board also approves additional charter elements to ensure the Bylaws principles of transparency, openness, fairness and representativeness and each Stakeholder Group is further directed to incorporate those additional charter elements into its permanent charter document at its earliest opportunity. The Board will re-examine the Stakeholder Group structures and their operations in one year and, thereafter, every three years to assure adherence to the ICANN Bylaws principles. In view of this resolution, the Board directs the Staff to re-initiate its work with the GNSO Constituency leaders to complete any necessary additional work on the re-confirmation of their existing charters (consistent with the principles and elements adopted with respect to the Stakeholder Group Charters) so that the Board can act on those documents at its September special meeting. Ten of the Board members present approved of this resolution. Three Board members opposed the resolution. The resolution passed. Another Board Member who was not present at the time of the vote but was present later in the meeting, also asked that her dissent and asked that it be placed on the record regarding the board’s role in making appointments. B 1(b) Board Seats 13&14 ========================== The Board received an update on the compromise solution for the seating of Board Seats 13 and 14. The Board then took the following action: Whereas, in June 2008, the Board formed a special working group (WG-GCR) to make specific recommendations regarding the restructuring of the GNSO Council. Whereas, as part of a comprehensive set of compromise recommendations the WG-GCR recommended that Board Seats #13 and #14 be selected in alternate elections by the Contracted Party House and the Non-contracted Party House of the GNSO Council. Whereas, the Board accords significant weight to the WG-GCR’s compromise recommendation in that it was formed through a thoroughly discussed and comprehensive community compromise. It is RESOLVED (2009.30.07.10); The Board approves the original recommendation of the WG-GCR with respect to the election of Board seats #13 and #14. The Contract Party House of the GNSO Council will nominate candidates for Board Seat #13 and select a Board member candidate by a 60% majority of that voting house. The Non-Contract Party House will nominate candidates for Board Seat #14 and select a Board member candidate by a 60% majority of that voting house. There will be no other restriction on the nomination or election of those Board candidates. All Board members in attendance unanimously approved of this resolution. B 1 (c) New Constituencies ========================== The Board received an update from Staff on the four pending petitions to form new constituencies within the GNSO. The Board then discussed that there are pending concerns with each petition, and received an update from the Structural Improvements Committee that it did not recommend the Board to take action on any of the petitions at this time, in favor of directing Staff to contact the prospective constituencies to inform of the issues within the petitions and allow for continued work prior to a Board decision. B 1 (d) Changes to Bylaws ========================= The Board received an update that Staff is working on preparing a package of all proposed amendments to the Bylaws that are required to seat a new GNSO Council in Seoul and allow the Bylaws to remain internally consistent. B 2 IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process ================================ The Board received an update from Staff on the ongoing work on the IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process to keep on track for a launch of the process just after the Seoul meeting, including the institution of a pre-evaluation testing. The Board also discussed concerns relating to the fee issues and potential conflict with the Government Advisory Committee and ccNSO positions. B 3 New gTLDS – Remaining Open Issues =================================== The Board received an update from Staff on the progress made on the launch of the New gTLD process and the remaining open issues, including trademark protection, malicious use, root server scaling and economic studies. B 4 JPA Progress Report ======================== A confidential discussion was held on the progress of the JPA discussions. B 5 New CEO Progress Report =========================== The CEO made a statement to the Board regarding his first 30 days in service to the organization, thanked all for the support they’ve given in integrating him into the organization and educating him, and encouraging all to continue to work with the important issues ahead. B 6 Document Deadline Policy for ICANN International Meetings from Public Participation Committee ======================================================================================== Whereas the Public Participation Committee (PPC) was charged at the May 2009 Board meeting with producing and managing an operational policy for the publication of documents intended for use at ICANN’s international public meetings, starting with the Seoul meeting in October 2009; Whereas the Committee has reviewed the document deadline temporary policy which was set up for the ICANN meeting in Sydney, and has held public and private meetings to discuss the impact and results of that policy; Whereas the Committee remains aware that the introduction of a document deadline policy will have a significant impact on the organization and its pattern of work and so will need to be introduced with sensitivity and creative compromise; It is hereby resolved (2009.07.30.11) that ICANN introduce a single 15-working-day document deadline for all ICANN international public meetings, from this point forward. That deadline will include all documentation for that meeting, as well as meeting agendas. It is also hereby resolved (2009.07.30.12) that an operational policy providing fuller details of the document deadline be published for public comment for a period of 30 days and that its implementation be monitored by the PPC, who should report back to the Board with any suggested refinements, as needed. The Board conducted an executive session without staff present, in confidence. The Meeting was adjourned at approximately,

1 0

Characterization of Interplay between Resolution of Overarching Issues and Next Draft of DAG
by Rosette, Kristina Aug. 3, 2009

Aug. 3, 2009

Kurt, (If you are not the correct staff person to whom this question should be addressed, would you please forward it to the person who is? Many thanks.) I just listened to the recording of the 23 July Council meeting. Early in the meeting there was some reference to the next draft of the DAG. In response to a question from Tony Harris, Avri said "I do not believe that [there] any steps dealing with overarching issues that are blocking factors for publication of the next DAG and that [solutions/proposals for them] will be included to the extent staff decides to include them." (39:20). Would you please advise if this characterization is correct? My understanding was somewhat different. Many thanks. K

2 1

RE: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting
by Tim Ruiz Aug. 2, 2009

Aug. 2, 2009

Avri, Does *mandate* have a particular meaning? I don't think we voted on this position. For the record, I do not agree with funding both current and new Councilors to Seoul. Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting From: "Zahid Jamil-DNDRC" <zahid(a)dndrc.com> Date: Wed, July 29, 2009 7:54 am To: "'Rosette, Kristina'" <krosette(a)cov.com>, "'Council GNSO'" <council(a)gnso.icann.org> I support this letter as well. -----Original Message----- From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 9:14 PM To: Council GNSO Subject: RE: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting I support. Thanks for drafting, Avri. -----Original Message----- From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 5:45 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Proposed letter on extra support for Seoul meeting hi, At the last meeting I was asked to communicate with the Board requesting special consideration for travel at the next mtg. As I suggested at the time, I think it better to send this to Kevin Wilson, the CFO, as he is in charge of the policy and is responsible for granting exceptions. Of course if it is the will of the GNSO and the GNSO Council that I send this to the Board, as well or instead, then I will do so. Given what happened the last time I sent a letter with a 2 day notice, I am going to send this letter 14 days after the last significant edit. If there are no edits to the suggested wording or objections to the sending of the letter, I will send it on: 10 august. --- Letter to Kevin Wilson, I have been mandated by the GNSO council to request support not only for the members of the new bi-cameral council to be seated at Seoul, but also for those current council members who may not be continuing on the new council due to the reorganization. The reason this request is being made is to provide continuity to the GNSO council at this time of restructuring, reorganization and 'improvement.' Thank you Avri Doria for the GNSO Council

4 3