January 2010 - council - lists.icann.org

Deadline for Motions is 20 Jan
by Gomes, Chuck Jan. 15, 2010

Jan. 15, 2010

Please note that the deadline for any motions for action in our 28 Jan Council meeting is next Wednesday, 20 January. Chuck

1 0

GNSO Council Agenda 28 January 2010.
by Glen de Saint Géry Jan. 14, 2010

Jan. 14, 2010

GNSO Council Agenda 28 January 2010. http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-28jan10-en.htm Wiki Reference: https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?proposed_agenda_28_january_2010 This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures approved 28 October 2009 for the GNSO Council. http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/operating-procedures-revised-draft-clean-09o… For convenience: * An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is provided in Appendix 1 at the end of this agenda. * An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the absentee voting procedures is provided in Appendix 2 at the end of this agenda. Meeting Time 11:00 UTC See the following and http://www.timeanddate.com for other times: 03:00 PST; 05:00 CST; 06:00 EST; 08:00 Buenos Aires; 09:00 Brazil; 12:00 CET; 14:00 Moscow; 16:00 Pakistan; 19:00 Hong Kong; 20:00 Tokyo; 22:00 Melbourne. Dial-in numbers will be sent individually to Council members. Councilors should notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if a dial out call is needed. Item 1: Administrative matters (10 minutes) 1.1 Roll call of Council members 1.2 Update any statements of interest 1.3 Review/amend agenda 1.4. Note the status of minutes for the following Council meetings per the new Council Operating Procedures: * 7 January meeting - Approved on 22 January 2010 Item 2: Decision regarding initiation of a PDP about vertical separation of Registries and Registrars (30 minutes) 2.1 Refer to Issues Report on Vertical Integration: http://gnso.icann.org/issues/vertical-integration/report-04dec09-en.pdf 2.2 Summary of and rationale for Issues Report recommendations (Margie Milam) 2.3 Discussion 2.4 Motions See motion on the Wiki https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?28_january_2010_motions Note: Absentee voting will be allowed. Item 3: Prioritization of GNSO work (5 minutes) 3.1 Status Report (Olga Cavalli) 3.2 Next steps? Item 4: Joint ccNSO-GNSO IDN Working Group (JIG) Update (10 minutes) 4.1 GNSO JIG membership update (Glen de St. Géry) 4.2 Working Group status report (Edmon Chung) 4.3 Approval of new GNSO JIG members Item 5: Affirmation of Commitments (AoC) Review Team Draft Proposal (20 minutes) 5.1 Refer to the Draft Proposal for Affirmation of Commitments (AoC) Review Teams http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/affirmation/affirmation-reviews-draft-propo… 5.2 Refer to the proposed GNSO Council Comments ( link tbp) 5.2.1 Overview (Bill Drake) 5.2.2 Discussion 5.2.3 Motion See motion on the Wiki https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?28_january_2010_motions 5.3 How should GNSO volunteers be identified as nominees for each of the four review teams? 5.3.1 Preliminary thoughts from the working team (Bill Drake) 5.3.2 Discussion 5.3.3 Next steps? Item 6: Nairobi Meeting Planning (15 minutes) 6.1 Staff update on safety and security (Denise Michel) 6.2 Meeting plan (Stéphane van Gelder) 6.2.1 Refer to draft schedule (insert link) 6.2.2 Topics for joint meeting with the GAC: 1) New gTLD policy implementation, including Expression of Interests; 2) Affirmation of Commitments (AoC). 6.2.2.1 Should we prepare discussion points and/or questions from the GNSO? 6.2.2.2 Drafting team to prepare for joint GNSO/GAC meeting? Item 7: Status updates (10 minutes) 7.1 Questions/comments on written status updates sent in advance by leaders of Working Groups, Work Teams, staff projects, etc.? Status updates http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/notes-council-28jan10-en.htm Item 8: Any Other Business (10 minutes) Item 9: The updated GNSO Project Status List (10 minutes) http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/pending-projects-list.pdf 9.1 Questions/comments? Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X, Section 3) 9. Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, Annex A hereto, or the GNSO Operating Procedures, the default threshold to pass a GNSO Council motion or other voting action requires a simple majority vote of each House. The voting thresholds described below shall apply to the following GNSO actions: a. Create an Issues Report: requires an affirmative vote of more than 25% vote of each House or majority of one House; b. Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as described in Annex A): requires an affirmative vote of more than 33% of each House or more than 66% of one House; c. Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of more than 75% of one House and a majority of the other House ("GNSO Supermajority"); d. Approve a PDP Recommendation Without a GNSO Supermajority: requires an affirmative vote of a majority of each House and further requires that one GNSO Council member representative of at least 3 of the 4 Stakeholder Groups supports the Recommendation; e. Approve a PDP Recommendation With a GNSO Supermajority: requires an affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority; and f. Approve a PDP Recommendation Imposing New Obligations on Certain Contracting Parties: where an ICANN contract provision specifies that "a two-thirds vote of the council" demonstrates the presence of a consensus, the GNSO Supermajority vote threshold will have to be met or exceeded with respect to any contracting party affected by such contract provision. Appendix 2: Absentee Voting Procedures (Council Operating Procedures 4.4) Members that are absent from a meeting at the time of a vote on the following items may vote by absentee ballot: a. Initiate a policy development process; b. Forward a policy recommendation to the Board; c. Recommend amendments to the ICANN Bylaws; d. Fill a position open for election. The GNSO Secretariat will provide reasonable means for transmitting and authenticating absentee ballots, which could include voting by telephone, e- mail, or web-based interface. Absentee ballots must be submitted within 72 hours following the start of the meeting in which a vote is initiated, except that, in exceptional circumstances announced at the time of the vote, the Chair may reduce this time to 24 hours or extend the time to 7 days. There must be a quorum for the meeting in which the vote is initiated. (03:00 Los Angeles, 06:00 Washington DC, 11:00 London, 12:00 Brussels, 22:00 Melbourne) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Local time between October and March, Winter in the NORTHERN hemisphere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 11:00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- California, USA (PST) UTC-8+0DST 03:00 Cedar Rapids, USA (CST) UTC-6+0DST 05:00 New York/Washington DC, USA (EST) UTC-5+0DST 06:00 Buenos Aires, Argentina UTC-3+0DST 08:00 Rio de Janeiro/Sao Paulo Brazil UTC-2+1DST 09:00 Dublin, Ireland (GMT) UTC+0DST 11:00 Darmstadt, Germany (CET) UTC+1+0DST 12:00 Paris, France (CET) UTC+1+0DST 12:00 Moscow, Russian Federation (MSK) UTC+3+0DST 14:00 Karachi, Pakistan UTC+5+0DST 16:00 Hong Kong, China UTC+8+0DST 19:00 Tokyo, Japan UTC+9+0DST 20:00 Melbourne,/Sydney Australia (EDT) UTC+10+1DST 22:00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The DST starts/ends on last Sunday of March 2010, 2:00 or 3:00 local time (with exceptions) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Kenya Agenda questions: Saturday Council dinner and Sunday breakfast
by Stéphane Van Gelder Jan. 14, 2010

Jan. 14, 2010

Dear Councillors, I am currently working with Glen on our agenda for the Kenya meeting. As you may recall, in Seoul we had an unofficial dinner on the meeting's first Saturday and there we also a Council breakfast on the following Sunday morning. For Kenya, the question of these events remains undecided and we are therefore not sure whether we should include them in the agenda or not. Our understanding is that there is broad support within the Council for the Saturday dinner, less certain support for the Sunday breakfast. What do people think? Should we plan for both the Saturday dinner and Sunday breakfast, one and not the other, none of the above? Stéphane

10 20

Revised Draft GNSO Council minutes 7January 2010
by Glen de Saint Géry Jan. 13, 2010

Jan. 13, 2010

Dear Councillors, Attached please find the revised draft minutes of the GNSO Council meeting on 7 January 2010. The two Items that have been revised are Item 4 and Item 7.2.1 Action Items. Item 4: The Internationalized Domain Names (IDN) Implementation Working Team Final Report Tina Dam provided the Council with a brief overview of the report as follows: Tina has added the following report: Variant Management * A TLD applicant may request variant forms of a base label and must classify each variant as 'desired' or 'undesired'; * Desired variants can be allocated to the applicant; * Desired variants can be delegated to the applicant if the applicant agrees to conform to the Rules outlined under Section 3.3; * Undesired variants will be reserved and neither allocated nor delegated. Three-character Restriction in gTLDs * Two-character gTLD strings can be allowed subject to conformance to the Rules outlined under Section 4.1.1; * The team does not recommend the banning of the one-character gTLDs. This issue is a matter of policy and must therefore be addressed by bodies such as the ccNSO and GNSO; * See Rules in Section 4.1.2. Moving forward actions: 1) Review of received comments, comment forum closes 8 January 2010. This includes questions for clarifications of what a variant is and we are looking at that. 2) Initiation of DNAME analysis to determine whether it can be used for variant management. 3) Inclusion of the 2-character registrations in the Applicant Guide Book 4) GNSO/ccNSO work on the 1-character registrations 7.2.1 Draft Proposal for Affirmation of Commitments (AoC) Review Teams Action Items: * Form a drafting team which is to select a lead person for coordination purposes * Draft comments on behalf of the GNSO * Agreed to provide comments as soon as possible so that the full Council can consider the proposal before the next Council meeting on 28 January 2010 * Examine how the Council will endorse candidates * Establish a mailing list * Launch a call for volunteers on the GNSO Council mailing list to join the drafting team. Please let me know if you would like any further changes to be made. If no comments are received, these minutes will be published, as approved on the website on page http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/index.html#jan on Friday, 22 January 2010. Thank you very much. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

RE: [council] Kenya Agenda questions: Saturday Council dinner and Sunday breakfast
by Tim Ruiz Jan. 13, 2010

Jan. 13, 2010

Thanks Stephane. What/where is the venue for Saturday night that you referred to? Will transportation be necessary/provided from the hotel and back? Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [council] Kenya Agenda questions: Saturday Council dinner and Sunday breakfast From: Stéphane_Van_Gelder <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com> Date: Wed, January 13, 2010 1:32 pm To: "Mary Wong" <MWong(a)piercelaw.edu> Cc: <council(a)gnso.icann.org> OK, my thanks to all who have commented so far. It looks like we have clear support for two sessions being put aside in the agenda, one on Sat evening for dinner, one on Sun morning for breakfast. Glen and I will move forward with this. Please note that I am not here going into the specifics of what these sessions are for. That is another debate, but one I think we should have, especially with reference to the Sunday "gripe" session... Stéphane Le 13 janv. 2010 à 18:44, Mary Wong a écrit : Ditto; and while I'd definitely prefer that the breakfast not be a "gripe session", I wouldn't be opposed to a free-flowing discussion (which inherently carries the risk of turning into griping, though perhaps not too much so while under the guiding hands of our magisterial Chair & Vice-Chairs :) Cheers Mary Mary W S Wong Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs Franklin Pierce Law Center Two White Street Concord, NH 03301 USA Email: mwong(a)piercelaw.edu Phone: 1-603-513-5143 Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584 >>> From: "Terry L Davis, P.E." <tdavis2(a)speakeasy.net>To:"'Rosette, Kristina'" <krosette(a)cov.com>, <council(a)gnso.icann.org>Date: 1/13/2010 12:40 PMSubject: RE: [council] Kenya Agenda questions: Saturday Council dinner and Sunday breakfast Stephane/Glen I like both. The more informal time we have together, the better our meetings seem to go. Take care Terry -----Original Message----- From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 8:21 AM To: council(a)gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: [council] Kenya Agenda questions: Saturday Council dinner and Sunday breakfast I liked the breakfast and thought it was a good idea (regardless of whether we use it for an air-clearing exercise). K -----Original Message----- From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 10:26 AM To: HughesDeb(a)usa.redcross.org Cc: council(a)gnso.icann.org Subject: Re: [council] Kenya Agenda questions: Saturday Council dinner and Sunday breakfast Thanks Debbie. If anyone is opposed to the breakfast, please let either Glen or myself know as soon as you can. Thanks again. Stéphane Le 13 janv. 2010 à 16:19, <HughesDeb(a)usa.redcross.org> a écrit : > Stéphane, > Breakfast and dinner are a great idea! > Thanks for working on this. > Debbie > > > Debra Y. Hughes, Senior Counsel > American Red Cross > > Office of the General Counsel > 2025 E Street, NW > Washington, D.C. 20006 > Phone: (202) 303-5356 > Fax: (202) 303-0143 > HughesDeb(a)usa.redcross.org > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org > [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder > Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 8:18 AM > To: Caroline Greer > Cc: council(a)gnso.icann.org > Subject: Re: [council] Kenya Agenda questions: Saturday Council dinner > and Sunday breakfast > > Thanks Caroline and Wolf for your quick responses. > > To be honest, I think the Sat dinner is a given. We all enjoyed the Seoul one and I never heard anyone say we shouldn't do another one. Plus it was a pay-your-own-way event so really, there shouldn't be much problem with this. > > Glen has already found a possible venue and I am going to make an executive decision ;) to put it on the agenda. If anyone objects within the next couple of days, we can always look at this again. > > The breakfast is the one I am much less sure of. As a reminder, this was kind of intended to be an informal discussion between ourselves to help anyone get anything they wanted off their chests. In Seoul, this was organised in one of the meeting rooms. Does the Council feel we should do this again for Kenya? > > Thanks, > > Stéphane > > Le 13 janv. 2010 à 12:56, Caroline Greer a écrit : > >> >> Stéphane, >> >> Being a 'newbie' to the group, I would welcome any opportunity for an informal get-together with colleagues before the meetings proper. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Caroline. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org >> [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of KnobenW(a)telekom.de >> Sent: 13 January 2010 11:43 >> To: stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com; council(a)gnso.icann.org >> Subject: AW: [council] Kenya Agenda questions: Saturday Council >> dinner and Sunday breakfast >> >> Stéphane, >> >> I support the dinner which gives more opportunity for unofficisl talks. >> >> Best regards >> >> Wolf-Ulrich >> >> >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org >> [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Stéphane Van >> Gelder >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2010 09:01 >> An: GNSO Council >> Betreff: [council] Kenya Agenda questions: Saturday Council dinner >> and Sunday breakfast >> >> Dear Councillors, >> >> I am currently working with Glen on our agenda for the Kenya meeting. >> >> As you may recall, in Seoul we had an unofficial dinner on the meeting's first Saturday and there we also a Council breakfast on the following Sunday morning. >> >> For Kenya, the question of these events remains undecided and we are therefore not sure whether we should include them in the agenda or not. Our understanding is that there is broad support within the Council for the Saturday dinner, less certain support for the Sunday breakfast. >> >> What do people think? Should we plan for both the Saturday dinner and Sunday breakfast, one and not the other, none of the above? >> >> Stéphane >> >

2 1

Re: [council] Kenya Agenda questions: Saturday Council dinner and Sunday breakfast
by Taylor, David Jan. 13, 2010

Jan. 13, 2010

Stéphane, I am certainly keen on the Council dinner, especially as I missed the opportunity in Seoul. Regarding, breakfast I am happy to get up if this is something considered helpful (breakfast - not me getting up). Kind regards David David Taylor Partner Lovells LLP Intellectual Property, Media and Technology Group 6 Avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris, France Tel:+33 (0) 1 53 67 47 47 Fax:+33 (0) 1 53 67 47 48 Email:drd@lovells.com www.lovells.com ----- Original Message ----- From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org <owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org> To: Caroline Greer <cgreer(a)mtld.mobi> Cc: council(a)gnso.icann.org <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Sent: Wed Jan 13 14:18:21 2010 Subject: Re: [council] Kenya Agenda questions: Saturday Council dinner and Sunday breakfast Thanks Caroline and Wolf for your quick responses. To be honest, I think the Sat dinner is a given. We all enjoyed the Seoul one and I never heard anyone say we shouldn't do another one. Plus it was a pay-your-own-way event so really, there shouldn't be much problem with this. Glen has already found a possible venue and I am going to make an executive decision ;) to put it on the agenda. If anyone objects within the next couple of days, we can always look at this again. The breakfast is the one I am much less sure of. As a reminder, this was kind of intended to be an informal discussion between ourselves to help anyone get anything they wanted off their chests. In Seoul, this was organised in one of the meeting rooms. Does the Council feel we should do this again for Kenya? Thanks, Stéphane Le 13 janv. 2010 à 12:56, Caroline Greer a écrit : > > Stéphane, > > Being a 'newbie' to the group, I would welcome any opportunity for an informal get-together with colleagues before the meetings proper. > > Kind regards, > > Caroline. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of KnobenW(a)telekom.de > Sent: 13 January 2010 11:43 > To: stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com; council(a)gnso.icann.org > Subject: AW: [council] Kenya Agenda questions: Saturday Council dinner and Sunday breakfast > > Stéphane, > > I support the dinner which gives more opportunity for unofficisl talks. > > Best regards > > Wolf-Ulrich > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Stéphane Van Gelder > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2010 09:01 > An: GNSO Council > Betreff: [council] Kenya Agenda questions: Saturday Council dinner and Sunday breakfast > > Dear Councillors, > > I am currently working with Glen on our agenda for the Kenya meeting. > > As you may recall, in Seoul we had an unofficial dinner on the meeting's first Saturday and there we also a Council breakfast on the following Sunday morning. > > For Kenya, the question of these events remains undecided and we are therefore not sure whether we should include them in the agenda or not. Our understanding is that there is broad support within the Council for the Saturday dinner, less certain support for the Sunday breakfast. > > What do people think? Should we plan for both the Saturday dinner and Sunday breakfast, one and not the other, none of the above? > > Stéphane >

2 1

RE: [council] Call for participation in the Affirmation Reviews Requirements Drafting Team
by Tim Ruiz Jan. 12, 2010

Jan. 12, 2010

Glen, I would like to participate. Tim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [council] Call for participation in the Affirmation Reviews Requirements Drafting Team From: Glen_de_Saint_Géry <Glen(a)icann.org> Date: Sun, January 10, 2010 11:38 am To: Council GNSO <council(a)gnso.icann.org> This is a call for participation in the drafting team to discuss the Affirmation Reviews Requirements. At the GNSO Council meeting on Thursday, 7 January, it was agreed that the Council provide comments to the discussion draft that addresses the requirements and implementation processes for the reviews called for in the Affirmation of Commitments. http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201001.htm#affrev (See below for full text) - The drafting team is to select a lead person for coordination purposes - Suggestions to be provided to the Council for discussion at the Council meeting on 28 January 2010 - Drafting team should provide first draft within a week - 14 January 2010 - Mailing list gnso-arr-dt(a)icann.org (arr = Affirmation Reviews Requirements; dt=drafting team) - Public Archives at: http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-arr-dt/ Current Volunteers: Olga Cavalli - NCA - GNSO Council vice chair William Drake - NCSG Chuck Gomes - RySG - GNSO Council chair Caroline Greer – RySG Please inform the GNSO Secretariat if you would like to be added to the drafting team mailing list. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201001.htm#affrev Explanation/Background: ICANN is publishing today for public comment a discussion draft that addresses the requirements and implementation processes for the reviews called for in the Affirmation of Commitments The Affirmation of Commitments contains specific provisions for periodic review of ICANN's key objectives. These reviews are to be performed by review teams composed of volunteer community members representative of the relevant ICANN Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees, as well as independent experts. The paper [PDF, 620K] http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/affirmation/affirmation-reviews-draft-propo… posted for public consultation presents a discussion draft to address the Affirmation review requirements; it describes: •The Affirmation requirements for reviews •The proposed methodology for conducting the reviews •The preliminary activities (such as the establishment of the review Teams and others) •The timeline of the preparatory activities and of the first review •A draft Terms of Reference for the first review Inputs are sought from the community on the full set of proposals contained in this paper. The public consultation will remain open till the end of January, 2010. Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Draft minutes of the GNSO Council meeting 7 January 2010
by Glen de Saint Géry Jan. 12, 2010

Jan. 12, 2010

Dear Councillors, Attached please find the draft minutes of the GNSO Council meeting on 7 January 2010. Please let me know if you would like any changes to be made. If no comments are received, these minutes will be published, as approved on the website on page http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/index.html#jan on Friday, 22 January 2010. Please note the action item arising from the minutes: Item 2 Action Item: Discussion of the Issues Report on Vertical Separation Issues Report regarding vertical separation of Registries and Registrars http://gnso.icann.org/issues/vertical-integration/report-04dec09-en.pdf (Please note this report has been translated into 5 UN languages and these are available on page http://gnso.icann.org/issues/) Chuck Gomes urged Councilors to continue the discussion on the Council mailing list in preparation for deciding whether or not to initiate a policy development process (PDP) at the Council meeting on 28 January 2010. Motions should be submitted to the Council no later than 20 January 2010 to be considered at the GNSO Council meeting on 28 January 2010. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Issues Report on Vertical Integration Between Registries and Registrars translated into 5 UN languages
by Glen de Saint Géry Jan. 11, 2010

Jan. 11, 2010

Dear All, Please note that the Issues Report on Vertical Integration Between Registries and Registrars has been translated into five UN languages, namely Arabic (AR), French (FR), Chinese (ZH), Spanish (ES) and Russian (RU) And is posted on page http://gnso.icann.org/issues/ under the heading: Issues Vertical Integration Between Registries and Registrars •Issues Report on Vertical Integration Between Registries and Registrars ◦تقرير مسائل GNSO حول التكامل الرأسي بين السجلات والمسجلي ◦Rapport du GNSO (organisation spécialisée dans les questions relatives aux noms de domaine génériques) sur les problèmes en matière d’intégration verticale entre registres et bureaux d’enregistrement ◦通用名称支持组织 (GNSO) 关于注册机构与注册商之间的垂直整合的问题报告 ◦Informe de la Organización de Apoyo para Nombres Genéricos (GNSO) sobre Cuestiones Relacionadas con la Integración Vertical Entre Registros y Registradores ◦Предварительный отчет ОПРИ по вопросам вертикальной интеграции между реестрами и регистраторами Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

FW: [council] FW: [REGYCON] FW: March 2009 Meeting in Kenya - Warnings
by Gomes, Chuck Jan. 11, 2010

Jan. 11, 2010

Here is the message I promised regarding ICANN safety and security plans in Nairobi. Chuck ________________________________ From: Liz Gasster [mailto:liz.gasster@icann.org] Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 1:42 PM To: Gomes, Chuck Cc: Denise Michel Subject: FW: [council] FW: [REGYCON] FW: March 2009 Meeting in Kenya - Warnings Chuck, attached please find information on the Nairobi meeting for the GNSO Council. Thanks, Liz

3 2