April 2011 - council - lists.icann.org

RE: [council] Whois Studies
by Tim Ruiz April 28, 2011

April 28, 2011

Won't the researchers who responded to the RFP need to review the changes and comment on their cost and feasibility? Will June 1 allow enough time for that? Tim > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [council] Whois Studies > From: "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson(a)ipracon.com> > Date: Wed, April 20, 2011 2:09 pm > To: <council(a)gnso.icann.org> > > FW: Whois StudiesAll, > > Based on the rationalisation outlined below, I would like to propose that Council further defers consideration of the WHOIS Registrant Identification Study i.e. that the motion be amended as follows: > > “Council defers consideration of the WHOIS Registrant Identification Study until the 9 June 2011 meeting and requests that any applicable motions in that regard be submitted not later than 1 June 2011.” > > The rationale for further delay is that the small working group of volunteers has met twice recently to discuss the Whois Study #2, the WHOIS Registrant Identification Study. The intention was to have a revised Study 2 proposal for Council consideration in the 28 April meeting. They anticipated making revisions to reduce presumptively negative terminology while retaining the original study design to prove/disprove a hypothesis that natural persons were using privacy/proxy while also engaging in commercial activities. But the discussion revealed more extensive questions about study 2: > · First, they believe that the present Study 2 proposal could be easily amended to answer all four registrant identification questions posed by the GAC in their April-2008 recommendations. > · Second, they believe that the objective and results of Study 2 can be improved to generate broader and deeper analysis that would provide needed context for GNSO and ICANN in future work on these issues. > Their goal will be to submit Study 2 recommendations to the Council not later than 1 June, in time for the 9 June Council meeting. > This delay should not have any impact on Studies 3 & 4, which are under consideration in the motion that is to be acted on April 28. > Best wishes, > > > Jonathan > > >

2 1

GNSO Council minutes and Project update
by Glen de Saint Géry April 28, 2011

April 28, 2011

Dear Councillors, Please note that the GNSO Council minutes of 7 April 2011 http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-council-07apr11-en.htm have been approved according to the GNSO Council procedures and posted on page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#apr The GNSO Projects Status list has been updated and can be viewed at: http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/pending-projects-list.pdf Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Fwd: FY 12 SSR Framework
by Stéphane Van Gelder April 27, 2011

April 27, 2011

Councillors, Please see below the message from Patrick Jones on the FY12 security, stability and resiliency framework. Stéphane Début du message réexpédié : > De : Patrick Jones <patrick.jones(a)icann.org> > Date : 27 avril 2011 16:42:56 HAEC > À : Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com>, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman(a)neustar.us>, "Mary.Wong(a)law.unh.edu" <Mary.Wong(a)law.unh.edu> > Cc : David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org> > Objet : FY 12 SSR Framework > > Dear Stéphane, Jeff and Mary, > > I am in the process of finalizing the FY 12 ICANN Security, Stability & Resiliency (SSR) Framework for public comment, and wanted to provide advance notice to the GNSO & its component stakeholder groups/constituencies that the Framework would soon be posted (dependent on the delivery of translations, hopefully by the end of this week). > > You may recall the FY 11 SSR Plan was published after the start of FY 11 in September 2010 and acknowledged by the ICANN Board at the Cartagena meeting in December 2010. In Cartagena, I heard many comments that the next version of the SSR Plan should be more streamlined, less redundant and describe clearly areas of ICANN activity vs ICANN awareness and observation. > > The updated version of the FY 12 SSR Framework is being provided in a more streamlined in a Powerpoint/PDF format. While this document is separate from the overall budget, it is intended to provide the community with a clear understanding of ICANN’s role in SSR, priorities in FY 12, and an overview of emerging threats and risks (even if these are areas where ICANN is merely an observer). It is also the intention that this document is aligned within the timing for delivery of the FY 12 ICANN Operating Plan and Budget for publication prior to the ICANN Singapore meeting. There will be a public comment period open on the new SSR Framework through the entire month of May. > > I would be happy to provide a briefing for individual stakeholder groups/constituencies if they would find this useful. > > Best regards, > > Patrick > > > -- > Patrick L. Jones > Senior Manager, Security > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers > 1101 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 930 > Washington, DC 20005 > Tel: +1 202 570 7115 > patrick.jones(a)icann.org > patrickjones.tel

1 0

FW: GNSO Council Abstention Notification Form [#47]
by Glen de Saint Géry April 27, 2011

April 27, 2011

From: ICANN [mailto:no-reply@wufoo.com] Sent: mercredi 27 avril 2011 07:29 To: gnso.secretariat(a)icann.org Subject: GNSO Council Abstention Notification Form [#47] Name of Officer: * Steve DelBianco Officer Email Address: * sdelbianco(a)netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco@netchoice.org> Date Prepared: * Saturday, March 26, 2011 GNSO Organization: * Business Constituency Officer Position or Title: * Vice Chair for Policy Coordination Voting Remedy: * Proxy Reason(s) for or condition(s) leading to the remedy: * Zahid Jamil will be presenting before a Parliamentary Standing Committee of the National Assembly of Pakistan around the same time as the conference call and will thus, be unable to attend. Specific subject(s)/measure(s)/motion(s)/action(s) of the Council for which the remedy is being exercised: * Motions on: 1. Whois; 2. to terminate the Policy Process Steering Committee; and 3. Public comments on global outreach recommendations. Date upon which the remedy will expire or terminate: [Note: may not exceed 3 months initially; may be renewed by sending an email with explanation to GNSO Secretariat] * Friday, April 29, 2011 I affirm that a voting position has been established on the matter(s) at issue pursuant to provisions contained in our Charter or Bylaws. * Yes Our GNSO Councilor has been instructed on how to vote on the matter(s). * Yes Please identify the GNSO Councilor who will serve as the voting proxy: * John Berard

1 0

FW: GNSO Council Abstention Notification Form [#48]
by Glen de Saint Géry April 27, 2011

April 27, 2011

From: ICANN [mailto:no-reply@wufoo.com] Sent: mercredi 27 avril 2011 10:27 To: gnso.secretariat(a)icann.org Subject: GNSO Council Abstention Notification Form [#48] Name of Officer: * Tony Holmes Officer Email Address: * tonyarholmes(a)btinternet.com<mailto:tonyarholmes@btinternet.com> Date Prepared: * Wednesday, April 27, 2011 GNSO Organization: * Internet Services Provider Constituency Officer Position or Title: * Chairman Voting Remedy: * Proxy Reason(s) for or condition(s) leading to the remedy: * Wolf-Ulrich Knoben is unable to attend the 28th April GNSO meeting due to a business conflict Specific subject(s)/measure(s)/motion(s)/action(s) of the Council for which the remedy is being exercised: * For all votes taken during the 28th April meeting Date upon which the remedy will expire or terminate: [Note: may not exceed 3 months initially; may be renewed by sending an email with explanation to GNSO Secretariat] * Friday, April 29, 2011 I affirm that a voting position has been established on the matter(s) at issue pursuant to provisions contained in our Charter or Bylaws. * Yes Our GNSO Councilor has been instructed on how to vote on the matter(s). * Yes Please identify the GNSO Councilor who will serve as the voting proxy: * Jaime Wagner

1 0

Current State of the UDRP Webinar Announcement
by Glen de Saint Géry April 26, 2011

April 26, 2011

Current State of the UDRP Webinar Announcement http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-21apr11-en.htm In order to participate, please RSVP via email to the GNSO Secretariat (gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org>) to receive the call details. 21 April 2011 You are invited to participate in a webinar on the current state of the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP). The ICANN Policy Staff is holding this Webinar on Tuesday 10 May at 15:00 UTC. The webinar will explore the current state of the UDRP. Attendees will hear the viewpoints from experts in the field on the effectiveness of the UDRP, and whether it should be modified or amended. This webinar is designed to solicit current information and data on the UDRP for reference in an Issue Report to be published by Staff. UDRP providers, panelists, attorneys and other observers of the UDRP process will be invited to share their perspective on this key ICANN policy. The UDRP has not been reviewed by the GNSO Council since its adoption. The Issue Report will speak to how t he UDRP has addressed the problem of cybersquatting to date, and explore any insufficiencies or inequalities associated with the process. This Issue Report will then be considered by the GNSO Council as it decides whether to commence a new policy development process (PDP) on the UDRP. The webinar is scheduled to run for 120 minutes, will be conducted in English only. The meeting will be run in Adobe Connect with a slide presentation along with a dial-in conference bridge for audio. Participants will have opportunity to ask questions at the end of the presentations. During the course of the webinar, questions may be submitted using the chat function of Adobe Connect. If you are not able to participate in the live session, the slides and MP3 will be made available shortly after the meeting. In order to participate, please RSVP via email to the GNSO Secretariat (gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org>) to receive the call details. We will send you an e-mail reminder before the event with log-in and dial-in details. Please DO NOT RSVP to any other ICANN staff members e-mail address.

1 0

FW: GNSO Council Abstention Notification Form [#46]
by Glen de Saint Géry April 26, 2011

April 26, 2011

Date revised. From: ICANN [mailto:no-reply@wufoo.com] Sent: mardi 26 avril 2011 12:34 To: gnso.secretariat(a)icann.org Subject: GNSO Council Abstention Notification Form [#46] Name of Officer: * Avri Doria Officer Email Address: * avri(a)acm.org<mailto:avri@acm.org> Date Prepared: * Tuesday, April 26, 2011 GNSO Organization: * Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group Officer Position or Title: * Chair Executive Committee Voting Remedy: * Proxy Reason(s) for or condition(s) leading to the remedy: * William Drake will be unavailable for the meeting on 28 April 2011 (correction from previous form submitted) Specific subject(s)/measure(s)/motion(s)/action(s) of the Council for which the remedy is being exercised: * for any and all votes to be held at the GNSO Council Teleconference Date upon which the remedy will expire or terminate: [Note: may not exceed 3 months initially; may be renewed by sending an email with explanation to GNSO Secretariat] * Friday, April 29, 2011 I affirm that a voting position has been established on the matter(s) at issue pursuant to provisions contained in our Charter or Bylaws. * Yes Our GNSO Councilor has been instructed on how to vote on the matter(s). * Yes Please identify the GNSO Councilor who will serve as the voting proxy: * Mary Wong

1 0

FW: GNSO Council Abstention Notification Form [#45]
by Glen de Saint Géry April 26, 2011

April 26, 2011

FYI From: ICANN [mailto:no-reply@wufoo.com] Sent: lundi 25 avril 2011 22:46 To: gnso.secretariat(a)icann.org Subject: GNSO Council Abstention Notification Form [#45] Name of Officer: * Avri Doria Officer Email Address: * avri(a)acm.org<mailto:avri@acm.org> Date Prepared: * Monday, April 25, 2011 GNSO Organization: * Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group Officer Position or Title: * Chair, Executive Committee Voting Remedy: * Proxy Reason(s) for or condition(s) leading to the remedy: * Rafik Dammak is unavailable for the Council Teleconference on 28 April 2011 Specific subject(s)/measure(s)/motion(s)/action(s) of the Council for which the remedy is being exercised: * For any and all votes to be taken during the 28 April 2011 meeting. Date upon which the remedy will expire or terminate: [Note: may not exceed 3 months initially; may be renewed by sending an email with explanation to GNSO Secretariat] * Friday, April 29, 2011 I affirm that a voting position has been established on the matter(s) at issue pursuant to provisions contained in our Charter or Bylaws. * Yes Our GNSO Councilor has been instructed on how to vote on the matter(s). * Yes Please identify the GNSO Councilor who will serve as the voting proxy: * Wendy Seltzer

1 0

FW: GNSO Council Abstention Notification Form [#44]
by Glen de Saint Géry April 26, 2011

April 26, 2011

FYI From: ICANN [mailto:no-reply@wufoo.com] Sent: lundi 25 avril 2011 20:24 To: gnso.secretariat(a)icann.org Subject: GNSO Council Abstention Notification Form [#44] Name of Officer: * Avri Doria Officer Email Address: * avri(a)acm.org<mailto:avri@acm.org> Date Prepared: * Monday, April 25, 2011 GNSO Organization: * Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group Officer Position or Title: * Chair, NCSG Executive Committee Voting Remedy: * Proxy Reason(s) for or condition(s) leading to the remedy: * William Drake will be unavailable at the time of the meeting Specific subject(s)/measure(s)/motion(s)/action(s) of the Council for which the remedy is being exercised: * Any and all motions to be voted on 29 April 2011. Date upon which the remedy will expire or terminate: [Note: may not exceed 3 months initially; may be renewed by sending an email with explanation to GNSO Secretariat] * Saturday, April 30, 2011 I affirm that a voting position has been established on the matter(s) at issue pursuant to provisions contained in our Charter or Bylaws. * Yes Our GNSO Councilor has been instructed on how to vote on the matter(s). * Yes Please identify the GNSO Councilor who will serve as the voting proxy: * Mary Wong

1 0

Fwd: gNSO - AoC WHOIS Review Team - Request for meeting
by Stéphane Van Gelder April 25, 2011

April 25, 2011

Councillors, FYI. I have responded to Emily to let her know that we would be happy to meet with the Whois RT and asked Mary and Glen, who are in charge of building our agenda for Singapore, to plan for this session. Thanks, Stéphane Début du message réexpédié : > De : Emily Taylor <emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk> > Date : 25 avril 2011 14:11:28 HAEC > À : stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com > Cc : Mary.Wong(a)law.unh.edu, Jeff.Neuman(a)neustar.us, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen(a)icann.org>, Olof Nordling <olof.nordling(a)icann.org>, Kathy Kleiman <kKleiman(a)pir.org> > Objet : gNSO - AoC WHOIS Review Team - Request for meeting > > Hi Stephane, > > I am writing in my capacity as Chair of the WHOIS Review Team (mandated under the Affirmation of Commitments) to request up to one hour of agenda time during your gNSO Council meeting on Sunday 26 June, or at any other mutually convenient time during the Singapore ICANN meeting. > > As you may know, the WHOIS Policy Review Team's membership is drawn from across the ICANN constituencies, SOs and ACs. We began our work in October 2010, and aim to conclude by the end of 2011. The scope of work and roadmap of the WHOIS RT as well as its activities may be found on the community wiki at https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/WHOIS+Policy+Review+Team. We have recently concluded our first public comment period on our early definitional work, and proposed approach, and are nearing the end of our information gathering phase. > > The WHOIS Review Team will hold a third public face-to-face meeting in Singapore on Sunday, 19 June and invite the ICANN community to interact with them on Wednesday, 22 June. > > In addition to this schedule, the RT Members unanimously expressed the wish to meet with the gNSO. Unfortunately, due to schedule conflicts, it was not possible for us to schedule time together during the San Francisco ICANN, but of course, given the gNSO's leading role in WHOIS policy debate over the years, we believe it is essential for the WHOIS Review Team members to understand your members' experiences, perspectives and views on both the policy and implementation of WHOIS. As your feedback and comments are key to the success of our project, it would be a great honour if the WHOIS Policy Review Team could please join your session or schedule a meeting with you to exchange views. Please advise whether you would be willing to dedicate an agenda item to the WHOIS Policy RT. > > Many thanks in advance, > > Very best regards > > > Emily Taylor > Chair > WHOIS Review Team > > 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK > telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 > emily.taylor(a)etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk > >

1 0