October 2012 - council - lists.icann.org

Fwd: Donuts Inc Will Reserve IOC/ RC Second-Level Names In All gTLDs
by Stéphane Van Gelder 09 Oct '12

09 Oct '12

Councillors, Please see the message below which I have been asked to share with you. Thanks, Stéphane Van Gelder Directeur Général / General manager INDOM NetNames France ---------------- Registry Relations and Strategy Director NetNames T: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 51 F: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 61 Début du message réexpédié : > De : Tindal Richard <richard(a)donuts.co> > Objet : Donuts Inc Will Reserve IOC/ RC Second-Level Names In All gTLDs > Date : 9 octobre 2012 01:18:13 UTC+02:00 > À : Van Gelder Stéphane <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com>, jeff.neuman(a)neustar.biz > Cc: Nevett Jon <JON(a)DONUTS.CO> > > Stephane and Jeff: > > Very shortly, Donuts will post a comment (http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/ioc-rcrc-recommendations-28sep1…) discussing our decision to reserve second-level names for the International Olympic Committee and Red Cross/Red Crescent, in the six official United Nations languages, as detailed in Section 2.2.1.2.3 of the Applicant Guidebook. The reservation will apply to all gTLDs eventually awarded to and administered by Donuts. > > Donuts will place these second-level names on its Domain Protected Marks List, a Donuts service that precludes registration of certain terms when any new gTLD administered by Donuts is made available for end-user registration. Donuts will waive fees for this service for the IOC, Red Cross, and Red Crescent. > > Please note this is a voluntary move on our part and a gesture of good will to the IOC. Donuts will continue to participate in further policy development regarding the protection of certain types of names at all levels. > > I invite you to share this news with others in the community as appropriate. We are notifying ICANN and others of this decision. > > Please feel free to contact me with questions. > > Best regards, > > Richard Tindal > > COO > Donuts Inc > +1.425.283.8248

1 0

Fwd: [Soac-infoalert] Upcoming invite for ATRT 2
by Stéphane Van Gelder 08 Oct '12

08 Oct '12

Councillors, FYI. This will need to be picked up by the new Leadership team post Toronto. Thanks, Stéphane Van Gelder Directeur Général / General manager INDOM NetNames France ---------------- Registry Relations and Strategy Director NetNames T: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 51 F: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 61 Début du message réexpédié : > De : Alice Jansen <alice.jansen(a)icann.org> > Objet : [Soac-infoalert] Upcoming invite for ATRT 2 > Date : 2 octobre 2012 11:23:21 HAEC > À : "soac-infoalert(a)icann.org" <soac-infoalert(a)icann.org> > > Dear SO/AC Chairs, > > As prescribed by the Affirmation of Commitments (AoC), ICANN is to organize a review of its accountability and transparency commitments no less frequently than every three years. For full information, please refer to section 9.1 of the Affirmation of Commitments http://www.icann.org/en/about/agreements/aoc/affirmation-of-commitments-30s…. > > In terms of Review Team composition, the AoC stipulates that: The review will be performed by volunteer community members […], and will include the following (or their designated nominees): the Chair of the GAC, the Chair of the Board of ICANN, the Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information of the DOC, representatives of the relevant ICANN Advisory Committees and Supporting Organizations and independent experts. Composition of the review team will be agreed jointly by the Selectors: the Chair of the GAC (in consultation with GAC members) and the Chair of the Board of ICANN. > > The first ATRT was launched in early 2010 and delivered its final report on 31 December 2010. For further information, refer to: http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/atrt > > Please note that in accordance with the AoC timeframe, the release of the Call for Applicants for the second Accountability & Transparency Review Team (ATRT 2) is imminent. > > The Call for Applicants invites interested individuals to apply for a position of Volunteer Review Team Member, in representation of a Supporting Organization or Advisory Committee, and/or for a position of Independent Expert on the second Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT 2). Details on the mandate, missions, desired skill set and application process will be included in the Call for Applicants. > > Applications received for a position of SO/AC representative on the ATRT 2 will be forwarded to the Supporting Organization or Advisory Committee identified by the candidate for endorsement. Should your SO/AC require additional information from applicants to reach your decision on endorsement, please inform Staff as soon as you can so that it may be included in the process. SO/AC endorsement will be factored into the selection of the ATRT 2 Members. > > The Call for Applicants also solicits independent experts to serve on the ATRT 2. Candidates will be considered and appointed by Selectors. > > Given SO/ACs' key role in the application process, Staff would like to share the following schedule with you: > 5 October 2012 – Publication of the Call for Applicants for the position of Volunteer Review team Member and Independent Expert > 5 December 2012 – Deadline to submit applications > 17 December 2012 – SO/ACs reveal the names of endorsed candidates > 7 January 2013 – Selectors announce the composition of the Review Team > Week of 21 January 2013 - Kick–off meeting > > Please kindly note that should your SO/AC or constituency wish to discuss this process, Staff is prepared to join your sessions in Toronto or to attend conference calls depending on your availability to provide you with an outline of the application process. Should you have any immediate questions, please also feel free to email them to olof.nordling(a)icann.org and alice.jansen(a)icann.org > > Thanks, > > Very best regards > > Olof Nordling & Alice Jansen > > ---- > > Alice Jansen > Organizational Reviews Manager > ICANN > Rond Point Schuman 6, > 1st floor > B-1040 Brussels > Belgium > Mobile: +32 4 73 31 76 56 > Skype: alice_jansen_icann > Email: alice.jansen(a)icann.org > _______________________________________________ > soac-infoalert mailing list > soac-infoalert(a)icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-infoalert

5 9

Council elections
by Stéphane Van Gelder 08 Oct '12

08 Oct '12

Councillors, I wanted to inform you of a discussion we had on the Leadership call today, about the upcoming Council elections and the NCA situation. I am asking staff to query the general Counsel on the following. It is our (the Leadership team's) understanding that: - Should an NCA be elected Council Chair, that person would serve as a non-voting Chair (see Council op procs). - Should an NCA be running for the Chair election, that person is still eligible to vote until elected Chair (so in effect that person can vote in the Chair election). - The 2012 NomCom has made an assignment for the position of non-voting (or homeless) NCA. This means that, Chair election not withstanding, Lanre remains assigned to the NCPH and Thomas to the CPH. - Given the above, if Thomas is elected Chair, he would remain assigned to the CPH but would become non-voting, which in effect means the CPH looses one vote. So here I am asking the general Counsel whether, if Thomas is elected Chair, the NomCom would not have to reassign Jennifer to the CPH? Staff, please ask JJ to provide an answer asap so that all of us are clear on the above going into our Toronto work weekend, where the Council will be talking to the Chair candidates and should therefore have the requested information. Thanks, Stéphane Van Gelder Directeur Général / General manager INDOM NetNames France ---------------- Registry Relations and Strategy Director NetNames T: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 51 F: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 61

2 1

Update on recent developments with Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS)
by Bruce Tonkin 06 Oct '12

06 Oct '12

From: http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/announcements-and-media/webinars Attached is a copy of the slides used in the Webinar during the week on the URS. Regards, Bruce Tonkin

1 0

NCA question
by Thomas Rickert 05 Oct '12

05 Oct '12

Stéphane, there have been a few questions about the exact process to be followed in case an NCA is elected GNSO Council Chair. I would prefer to base an answer on information provided by you and not my own interpretation and reading of the Bylaws and GNSO Operating Procedures. Thank you. Thomas

3 2

Re: [council] FW: Invitation to the IDN Variant Public Session in Toronto
by Alan Greenberg 05 Oct '12

05 Oct '12

At 04/10/2012 11:04 PM, Ching Chiao [Registry.Asia] wrote: >Thank Margie. > >It would be appreciated if the VIP team can >provide a separate update session for the >Council during the weekend working session. As >the comment period of VIP closes on the 19th, an >earlier session will be very helpful for the >Council as well as respective stakeholder groups. > >Ching > > >On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Margie Milam ><<mailto:Margie.Milam@icann.org>Margie.Milam(a)icann.org> wrote: > >Dear All- > > > >Please see the invitation below related to IDNs. > > > >All the Best, > >__________ > >Margie Milam > >Senior Policy Counselor > >ICANN > >__________ > > > >From: Dennis Chang >Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2012 6:23 PM >To: '<mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com>stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com' >Cc: Glen de Saint Géry; Robert Hoggarth >Subject: Invitation to the IDN Variant Public Session in Toronto > > > >Dear Stephane, > > > >IDN Variant TLD Team would like to invite you >and GNSO members to attend the IDN Variant TLD public session in Toronto. > >Along with the program status update, there will >be presentation and discussion on two of the projects: > >1) Label Generation Process for the Root Zone > >2) User Experience Implication of Active Variant TLDs. > > > >As community inputs are critical to the success >of these projects, your attendance and >participation will be greatly appreciated. > >Please do forward this invitation to your >constituency members and other interested community members. > > > >Meeting Detail: > >Date: Thu, 18 October 2012 - 09:15 - 10:15 > >Room: Metro East > >Session Leader: <mailto:kurt.pritz@icann.org>Kurt Pritz | Chief of Strategy > >Session detail and resources updated on : ><http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34179>http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34179 > > > > > >Kind Regards, > >Dennis Chang > >Executive Program Management Consultant > ><mailto:dennis.chang@icann.org>dennis.chang(a)icann.org > ><tel:213-293-7889>213-293-7889 > >Skype: dennisschang > > >

1 0

Our Toronto meetings
by Stéphane Van Gelder 05 Oct '12

05 Oct '12

Councillors, I just wanted to draw your attention to a couple of things with regards to our Toronto agenda. Extreme scheduling challenges have meant that we will not be meeting with two of our regular meeting partners, the ccNSO and the GAC. The GAC's High Level meeting is taking up a lot of bandwidth in Toronto and we have had to accommodate that. So has the ccNSO. We are currently working with the ccNSO leadership on a joint Chair/VIce Chairs meeting and I will let you know if that happens. Our meeting with the Board will happen as usual. And as Glen and Wolf have worked so hard to complete our weekend schedule, they have included a discussion session on that. I would like to suggest that we include, as topics for our discussion with the Board, 1) the GNSO review and 2) the impact of new gTLDs. Finally, just to remind you that we are trying a new session in Toronto which is the lead-in brainstorming session. You will all remember that this has been enacted after it was suggested during our Prague wrap-up, and I am very please to see it on our agenda. Thanks, Stéphane Van Gelder Directeur Général / General manager INDOM NetNames France ---------------- Registry Relations and Strategy Director NetNames T: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 51 F: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 61

1 0

IRD report-- follow up actions
by Ching Chiao [Registry.Asia] 05 Oct '12

05 Oct '12

Dear Stéphane, Councilors, I'd like to have your attention on the possible follow-up action items for IRD. In the co-signed GNSO-SSAC letter sent to the Board last month, we have mentioned that "*requesting the (IRD) implementation plan time-lines and clarifying that any policy implications in implementing the recommendations will have to be considered by the GNSO Council*". As we are expecting the Board / Staff to provide time-lines, as well as to receive the regular updates from the Staff on the technical front (refer to recommendation 1 -- IRD submission and display AND 3 -- IRD access protocol). It is my belief that the Council can work in parallel and initiate the work on preparing the issue report for recommendation 2: " 2. The GNSO Council and the SSAC should request a common Issue Report on translation and transliteration of contact information. The Issue Report should consider whether it is desirable to translate contact information to a single common language or transliterate contact information to a single common script. It should also consider who should bear the burden and who is in the best position to address these issues. The Issue Report should consider policy questions raised in the IRD-WG Final Report and should also recommend whether to start a policy development process (PDP) to address those questions. " The RySG has agreed such approach and I am expecting further feedback from the RrSG as well. From an operational viewpoint, translation and/or transliteration of registration data does require clear responsibilities from registrants and registrars. As the Toronto meeting approaches, I feel that it's rather important to address this issue timely not only the ground works has been done for few years, but the result of the work should offer complete clarity for IDN gTLD. If you all agree, we would then ask the corresponding staff to prepare: 1) IRD technical update 2) Resolution of issue report on Rec. 2 for the Toronto meeting. Comments and suggestions are welcome. Thank you very much. Best regards, Ching

2 2

Letter from NTIA to ICANN regarding new gTLDs
by Bruce Tonkin 05 Oct '12

05 Oct '12

Hello All, From: http://www.icann.org/en/news/correspondence/strickling-to-crocker-04oct12-en Attached is the latest letter from the US Dept of Commerce on the new gTLD program. Regards, Bruce Tonkin

1 0

Fwd: [Soac-infoalert] Community Input and Advice Process Session in Toronto
by Stéphane Van Gelder 05 Oct '12

05 Oct '12

FYI Stéphane Van Gelder Directeur Général / General manager INDOM NetNames France ---------------- Registry Relations and Strategy Director NetNames T: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 51 F: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 61 Début du message réexpédié : > De : David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org> > Objet : Rép : [Soac-infoalert] Community Input and Advice Process Session in Toronto > Date : 4 octobre 2012 17:39:24 HAEC > À : "soac-infoalert(a)icann.org" <soac-infoalert(a)icann.org> > > Dear SO-AC Leaders and Colleagues: > > While we all are trying to arrange our busy schedules for the ICANN meeting in Toronto, I ask for your cooperation to raise awareness about this important issue. > > This discussion document on this topic was posted for public comment at the request of the Board Governance Committee to solicit views from the ICANN community on ways to enhance the process by which the Board seeks advice from the ICANN community beyond the traditional public comment process. This issue stems from the work undertaken in fulfillment of recommendation No. 6 from the Accountability and Transparency Review Team, and highlights an area where improvements can lead to predictability and consistency for future Board actions. > > The Monday session in Toronto was on the schedule as a first step to draw attention to this issue and to start an ongoing discussion. Therefore, I would ask your cooperation to share this notice with your groups, even if participation in this session may not be possible. > > Regards, David > > David A. Olive > Vice President, Policy Development Support > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > 1101 New York Avenue, NW - Suite 930 > Washington, D.C. 20005 > Office: 202.570.7126 Mobile: 202.341.3611 > > > > > On 4 okt 2012, at 15:02, Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> wrote: > >> Dear SO/AC Leaders, >> >> As you may have seen, ICANN Staff posted a document on Community Input and Advice Process for public comment on 24 September (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/input-advice-function-24sep12-e…). In addition, a session has been scheduled in Toronto to discuss this subject (see http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34195). The objective of this public comment forum and the discussion in Toronto is to obtain community input on the process by which the ICANN Board seeks advice from the community on topics that are not subject to formal policy development processes. It is hoped that these discussions could lead to a consistent and predictable process to be adopted by the ICANN Board for such inquiries. >> >> For the meeting in Toronto we are putting together an informal panel discussion during which we would like to hear from the different SO/ACs how they currently deal which such requests from the Board and provide their views on the questions that were also outlined in the discussion paper (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/in-focus/accountability/input-advice-function-…): >> Should standardized processes be created for the Board's receipt of community input and advice? >> If so, should such a procedure be standardized across ICANN SOs/ACs, aligned with the current existing procedures, or should there be some flexibility among the SOs/ACs (certain parts are required for all, while other parts may be developed by the respective SO/Acs) >> How should the Board request this input and advice? >> What is the most effective and efficient method to deal with the issue topic identified? Should it be a working group, could current procedures be used? Who determines which method will be used? >> Should working groups be chartered for each initiative? >> How are different parts of the ICANN community expected to work together in these efforts? >> What minimum public consultation requirements, if any, should be required within this function? >> Who within ICANN lead this effort? >> We would like to encourage you and/or members of your SO/AC to attend this session to share your views. If you have any suggestions for panel members, please feel free to share those off-list with me. The session takes place on Monday 15 October from 13.30 – 14.45 local time in room Metro Centre. >> >> With best regards, >> >> Marika >> >> Marika Konings >> Sr. Policy Director >> ICANN >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> soac-infoalert mailing list >> soac-infoalert(a)icann.org >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-infoalert > > _______________________________________________ > soac-infoalert mailing list > soac-infoalert(a)icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/soac-infoalert

1 0