November 2014 - council - lists.icann.org

News on the charter for the Enhancing Accountability Cross Community Working Group
by Thomas Rickert 20 Nov '14

20 Nov '14

All, as newly appointed liaison to the ccNSO Council, it is my pleasure to report to you that the ccNSO has just adopted the charter of the Enhancing Accountability Cross Community Working Group unanimously. Best, Thomas

1 0

Re: [council] Re: Request from IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection WG
by James M. Bladel 18 Nov '14

18 Nov '14

Mary & Mason & Councilors: I agree with the premise of this letter: That the GAC advice in the Los Angeles Communique is incompatible with certain elements of the WG charter. And I support the chairs’ request to engage Mason on this issue. Question: Should there be any other folks supporting Mason in this effort (WG chairs, Council members, etc.)? Or is it enough to note that Mason represents all interests in this regard? Thanks— J. From: Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>> Date: Monday, November 17, 2014 at 21:22 To: Mason Cole <mason(a)donuts.co<mailto:mason@donuts.co>> Cc: GNSO Council List <council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: [council] Re: Request from IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection WG Hello again everyone, As requested, please find attached a copy of the IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection WG letter to the GNSO Council. Phil Corwin, one of the WG co-chairs, has also asked me to convey his hope that Mason will be able to engage with the GAC on this issue sooner rather than later. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> From: Mason Cole <mason(a)donuts.co<mailto:mason@donuts.co>> Date: Monday, November 17, 2014 at 7:55 PM To: Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>> Cc: "council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>" <council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>>, Phil Corwin <psc(a)vlaw-dc.com<mailto:psc@vlaw-dc.com>>, Petter Rindforth <petter.rindforth(a)fenixlegal.eu<mailto:petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu>> Subject: Re: Request from IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection WG Mary -- Would you kindly recirculate the current version? Thanks -- Mason On Nov 17, 2014, at 12:12 PM, Mary Wong wrote: Hello again everyone, As noted on the Council call last Thursday, the IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection WG believes that its request to have Mason engage early with the GAC, regarding certain questions arising from the GAC’s Los Angeles Communique, is a matter of some urgency. As Mason has indicated his willingness to convey the WG’s questions (as described in the letter circulated to the Council on 6 November) to the GAC and assist with any response or consequent discussion, please indicate if you have any objections to him doing so as soon as you can, and preferably before the end of this week if at all possible. Please also let me know if you need me to recirculate the letter. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> From: Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>> Date: Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 11:46 PM To: "council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>" <council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Cc: Mason Cole <mason(a)donuts.co<mailto:mason@donuts.co>>, Phil Corwin <psc(a)vlaw-dc.com<mailto:psc@vlaw-dc.com>>, Petter Rindforth <petter.rindforth(a)fenixlegal.eu<mailto:petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu>> Subject: Request from IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection WG Dear Councilors, Please find attached a letter request from the IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection WG, which I am transmitting to you on behalf of the WG Co-Chairs, Phil Corwin and Petter Rindforth, in the absence of a new Council liaison. In the letter, the WG requests that the Council agree to ask Mason Cole (GAC-GNSO liaison) to engage with the GAC in order to resolve certain questions arising from the GAC’s Los Angeles Communique. The specific questions that the WG is suggesting for such engagement are contained in the attached letter. As the WG was able only to discuss and finalize the request at their meeting this week, this is the earliest opportunity that it has had to send the letter to you. I note with gratitude that Jonathan, Marika and Glen have kindly allotted a slot under “AOB” on the agenda of the forthcoming GNSO Council meeting for discussion of this matter; however, as the WG would very much like to pursue early engagement with the GAC as soon as possible, it is their hope that the Council will be able to begin discussing their request upon receipt of this letter. Should the Council require any further information or background, staff supporting the WG (Steve Chan and me), Mason (who is also a member of the WG and participated in the WG’s discussion of this request) and, of course, Phil and Petter, will be very glad to oblige. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> Mason Cole VP Communications & Industry Relations Donuts Inc. ……………………………… …… …… mason(a)donuts.co<mailto:mason@donuts.co> Ofc +1 503 908 7623 Cell +1 503 407 2555

3 2

Re: [council] GNSO Council action items 13 November 2014
by Marika Konings 18 Nov '14

18 Nov '14

In relation to the Enhancing ICANN Accountability CCWG and the action item that 'Each GNSO Stakeholder Group should identify one member for the CWG by 20 November 2014 taking into account the charter requirement’, I thought it might be helpful to refer to the charter requirements which state that: Best efforts should be made to ensure that individual members: * Have sufficient expertise to participate in the applicable subject matter (see for example https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/enhancing-accountability-faqs-2014-08… for areas identified for expertise); * Commit to actively participate in the activities of the CCWG-Accountability on an ongoing and long-term basis; and * Where appropriate, solicit and communicate the views and concerns of individuals in the organization that appoints them. Best regards, Marika From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen(a)icann.org<mailto:Glen@icann.org>> Date: Tuesday 18 November 2014 15:31 To: Council GNSO <council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: [council] GNSO Council action items 13 November 2014 Dear Councillors, Please find the action items arising from the GNSO Council meeting on 13 November 2014. Item 4: MOTION - Adoption of a Charter for a Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability Action Item: Thomas Rickert was nominated as the GNSO Council liaison and GNSO co-chair to the CWGCross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability Each GNSO Stakeholder Group should identify one member for the CWG by 20 November 2014 taking into account the charter requirement. Item 5: MOTION – Changes to GNSO Operating Procedures & Working Group Guidelines to Address Issues relating to Waiver of Motion Deadlines, GNSO Council Voting Outside a Council Meeting & Working Group Consensus Levels Action Item The GNSO Council instructs ICANN staff to post the new version of the GNSO Operating Procedures and GNSO Working Group Guidelines, effective immediately upon adoption. Item 6: – UPDATE - Name Collision Action Item All constituencies/stakeholder groups should discuss the topic within their respective groups to ascertain what, if any policy development is deemed necessary and be prepared for a discussion at the next Council meeting in December 2014. Item 7: UPDATE – GNSO / GAC Consultation Group and related work Action item Inform the GAC that Volker Greimann is no longer a member of the GAC GNSO Consultation group and has been replaced by Carlos Raúl Gutierrez. Item 9.1 – Any Other Business Action Item Inform the different groups that the Council Liaisons have been confirmed. Curative Rights Protections for IGO/INGOs PDP – Council Liaison - Susan Kawaguchi Data & Metrics for Policy Making – Council Liaison - Volker Greimann Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP – Council Liaison - James Bladel Translation & Transliteration PDP – Council Liaison - Amr Elsadr Geographic Regions WG – Council Liaison - Cheryl Langdon-Orr CWG on a Framework for CWG Principles (co-chair John Berard) - Council Liaison - Avri Doria CWG to develop a framework for the use of country and territory names as TLDs - co-chair position – Carlos Raúl Gutierrez GNSO Council liaison to the ccNSO – Thomas Rickert 9.2 Correspondence with New gTLD Program Committee NGPC on IGO & RCRC. Action item Staff to pursue the issue internally with the appropriate staff when a response can be expected. 9.3Skill sets for Nominating Committee. Action Item Finalise the skill set for the Nominating Committee on the Council mailing list 9.4 IGO/INGO Curative Rights Protection WG letter<http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg16859.html> requesting Mason Cole to engage with the GAC on certain questions regarding the GAC Los Angeles Communique. Action item Council is encouraged to take a decision as soon as possible because of the urgency from the perspective of the working group. Mason Cole is ready to step forward but needs the go-ahead from the Council . Confirm on mailing list. 9.5Council in attendance to review informal notes of the Council Development Session held on Friday, 17 October 2014. Action item Circulate notes to the Council mailing list and start discussion on the mailing list. Please let me know if all the action items have been captured or if you have any questions. Thank you very much. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

GNSO Council action items 13 November 2014
by Glen de Saint Géry 18 Nov '14

18 Nov '14

Dear Councillors, Please find the action items arising from the GNSO Council meeting on 13 November 2014. Item 4: MOTION - Adoption of a Charter for a Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability Action Item: Thomas Rickert was nominated as the GNSO Council liaison and GNSO co-chair to the CWG Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability Each GNSO Stakeholder Group should identify one member for the CWG by 20 November 2014 taking into account the charter requirement. Item 5: MOTION - Changes to GNSO Operating Procedures & Working Group Guidelines to Address Issues relating to Waiver of Motion Deadlines, GNSO Council Voting Outside a Council Meeting & Working Group Consensus Levels Action Item The GNSO Council instructs ICANN staff to post the new version of the GNSO Operating Procedures and GNSO Working Group Guidelines, effective immediately upon adoption. Item 6: - UPDATE - Name Collision Action Item All constituencies/stakeholder groups should discuss the topic within their respective groups to ascertain what, if any policy development is deemed necessary and be prepared for a discussion at the next Council meeting in December 2014. Item 7: UPDATE - GNSO / GAC Consultation Group and related work Action item Inform the GAC that Volker Greimann is no longer a member of the GAC GNSO Consultation group and has been replaced by Carlos Raúl Gutierrez. Item 9.1 - Any Other Business Action Item Inform the different groups that the Council Liaisons have been confirmed. Curative Rights Protections for IGO/INGOs PDP - Council Liaison - Susan Kawaguchi Data & Metrics for Policy Making - Council Liaison - Volker Greimann Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP - Council Liaison - James Bladel Translation & Transliteration PDP - Council Liaison - Amr Elsadr Geographic Regions WG - Council Liaison - Cheryl Langdon-Orr CWG on a Framework for CWG Principles (co-chair John Berard) - Council Liaison - Avri Doria CWG to develop a framework for the use of country and territory names as TLDs - co-chair position - Carlos Raúl Gutierrez GNSO Council liaison to the ccNSO - Thomas Rickert 9.2 Correspondence with New gTLD Program Committee NGPC on IGO & RCRC. Action item Staff to pursue the issue internally with the appropriate staff when a response can be expected. 9.3 Skill sets for Nominating Committee. Action Item Finalise the skill set for the Nominating Committee on the Council mailing list 9.4 IGO/INGO Curative Rights Protection WG letter<http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg16859.html> requesting Mason Cole to engage with the GAC on certain questions regarding the GAC Los Angeles Communique. Action item Council is encouraged to take a decision as soon as possible because of the urgency from the perspective of the working group. Mason Cole is ready to step forward but needs the go-ahead from the Council . Confirm on mailing list. 9.5 Council in attendance to review informal notes of the Council Development Session held on Friday, 17 October 2014. Action item Circulate notes to the Council mailing list and start discussion on the mailing list. Please let me know if all the action items have been captured or if you have any questions. Thank you very much. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

FYI - Blog Post 'Working Together to Tame the Coming Tsunami'
by Marika Konings 18 Nov '14

18 Nov '14

Dear All, For your information, please find below a blog post from Ashwin Rangan, ICANN’s CIIO requesting community input on his suggestions concerning streamlining and cooperation in relation to exploring tools & technologies that may aid the ICANN community in its activities. Best regards, Marika https://www.icann.org/news/blog/working-together-to-tame-the-coming-tsunami Working Together to Tame the Coming Tsunami <https://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=300&winname=addthis&pub=ra-52fcc7eb2…><https://www.icann.org/news/blog/working-together-to-tame-the-coming-tsunami#><https://www.icann.org/news/blog/working-together-to-tame-the-coming-tsunami#><https://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=300&winname=addthis&pub=ra-52fcc7eb2…><https://www.icann.org/news/blog/working-together-to-tame-the-coming-tsunami#><https://www.icann.org/news/blog/working-together-to-tame-the-coming-tsunami#> It is just over eight months since I joined ICANN and several noteworthy events have occurred since. Within a few days of coming on board, the IANA Stewardship Transition was announced. Fadi's efforts to appropriately position Internet Governance and the follow-on work with NETMundial have progressed, leading to some critical hand-overs. And in attending my third (yes, already my third!) ICANN meeting in Los Angeles, I was able to detect an increasing tone of collaboration within the Stakeholder community, something that will require our increased support. For instance, various Stakeholder community groups have been meeting to review ICANN accountability, transparency and processes with an eye on improving all of them; sometimes in an interlinked fashion. The fact is more and more cross-community teams are forming all of the time. And they're beginning to work on a set of principles as well as a common framework for such cross-community activities. Fadi has recognized this as well. And during his Opening Keynote at ICANN51, he made clear that his focus and energies already are directed more inward than outward. He also is committed to remain focused on ICANN Operations. And so is his Global Leadership team. With six SO-AC-SG-C Leader roundtables during ICANN51, we, sitting alongside Fadi, heard many new ideas for operations improvements. Independently, to help me gain an accelerated education about the ICANN ecosystem, I have been visiting with the different Stakeholder groups - at ICANN meetings, over the phone, in person - whenever there is an opportunity. And I'm recognizing opportunities for improved services, leveraging tools and technologies. All of these activities have the same goal - a time-efficient and cost-effective ICANN (Stakeholder communities + Board + Staff), working collaboratively. However, left to their current pathways, this is becoming like a wild Tsunami, gaining strength from many directions - a potentially uncoordinated Tsunami of requests and requirements. Speaking from an IT point of view, I think we can bring these various vectors together in a constructive way, for the collective benefit of all of us. Together, we can tame this Tsunami. Here is what I am feeling… I'm energized by the prospects. Many of these ideas are compelling. We can get passionate about them. Their need is clear. Here is what I am thinking… What's required to make this all happen is becoming clearer to me. And many Stakeholder communities are saying the same thing – but from their specific point of view. For example - The ALAC wants a set of Issues Management Tools that, in its request, is almost identical to what the SSAC wants. The GAC and the ALAC are both requesting revised websites. The GNSO and the ALAC are both seeking a Knowledge/ Information Management tool. And so on.... To address this, we have a choice. The Stakeholder communities could EITHER have different parts of ICANN be pressed to define, develop and deliver specific, point solutions to satisfy each of these requests, satisfying one Stakeholder community at a time. OR, we can choose a path where a single Stakeholder community (or a small cross-community group) takes "ownership" of an idea, fleshes it out completely and, when almost fully-cooked, invites other Stakeholder groups to weigh-in. The result could be a robust set of requirements that represents the collective needs of our vast, global community. We - the ICANN staff - can then take these requirements and source a tool or a set of technological capabilities in the most cost-effective and time-efficient manner. Of course, not everything will fit into this mind-map. However, there are many requests coming at us concurrently which do fit this model. If we choose the "one-off" path, we would be robbing ourselves of an invaluable opportunity and adding to the confusing plethora of tools already in the ICANN toolbox, not to mention adding to ICANN's operating costs. So here's what I am proposing. We will create a page on the ICANN Community Wiki, where all the requests coming our way are catalogued with the specific Stakeholder community making the request. That can be the base from which we could journey together towards a common Stakeholder, community-wide, set of tools and technologies. Our remit could then be to ensure delivery and support of a harmonized set of robust tools which interoperate where possible and sensible. Here are my questions of you: 1. Do you agree with this concept – of build once and re-use many times? The IT artifacts and services I have reviewed do not currently show much of re-use. 2. If you agree, would you be willing to work as a member of a cross-community working group, focused on Community collaboration Tools? For the sake of brevity, let us call it a Community Tools Focus Group, or CTFG. 3. If that too is agreeable, would it make sense to have just ONE such CTFG across all SOs? Like an SO-CTFG? And ANOTHER such, for all ACs? Like an AC-CTFG? 4. As a working charter for such CTFGs, could you commit time to work with other CTFG members to help frame a Problem Statement (along with clear and specific examples)? 5. The ICANN staff can take this as input and seek appropriate solutions to address the problem. And get back with the concerned CTFG with a small (2 or 3) set of considered options. From which the CTFG can pick the solution that best meets the needs. I welcome your thoughts....You can send them my way by using the subject handle "Tsunami" and addressing your email to: Ashwin.rangan(a)icann.org<mailto:Ashwin.rangan@icann.org> Thank you for your time!

1 0

Request from IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection WG
by Mary Wong 17 Nov '14

17 Nov '14

Dear Councilors, Please find attached a letter request from the IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection WG, which I am transmitting to you on behalf of the WG Co-Chairs, Phil Corwin and Petter Rindforth, in the absence of a new Council liaison. In the letter, the WG requests that the Council agree to ask Mason Cole (GAC-GNSO liaison) to engage with the GAC in order to resolve certain questions arising from the GAC¹s Los Angeles Communique. The specific questions that the WG is suggesting for such engagement are contained in the attached letter. As the WG was able only to discuss and finalize the request at their meeting this week, this is the earliest opportunity that it has had to send the letter to you. I note with gratitude that Jonathan, Marika and Glen have kindly allotted a slot under ³AOB² on the agenda of the forthcoming GNSO Council meeting for discussion of this matter; however, as the WG would very much like to pursue early engagement with the GAC as soon as possible, it is their hope that the Council will be able to begin discussing their request upon receipt of this letter. Should the Council require any further information or background, staff supporting the WG (Steve Chan and me), Mason (who is also a member of the WG and participated in the WG¹s discussion of this request) and, of course, Phil and Petter, will be very glad to oblige. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org

2 3

GNSO Council Resolution 13 November 2014
by Glen de Saint Géry 14 Nov '14

14 Nov '14

Dear Councillors, The GNSO Operating Procedure<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-26mar14-en.pdf> foresees absentee voting (per Section 4.4.1 of the GNSO Operating Procedures) for the resolution below that was before the GNSO Council at its meeting on 13 November 2014. Edward Morris was absent from the meeting and submitted an absentee ballot<http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg16880.html>. The Voting results<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/voting-op-procedures-wg-guidelines-13nov14…> are: Contracted Party House: 7 votes in favour (100%) Non-Contracted Party House: 11 votes in favour and 2 votes against (84.6%) Changes to GNSO Operating Procedures & Working Group Guidelines to Address Issues relating to Waiver of Motion Deadlines, GNSO Council Voting Outside a Council Meeting & Working Group Consensus Levels WHEREAS: 1. The GNSO Council has determined that: a. the current GNSO Operating Procedures do not contain a specific provision on waiving the deadline to submit a motion for voting by the GNSO Council; b. the current GNSO Operating Procedures also do not contain a specific provision that permits the Council to vote outside a meeting; and c. the language relating to Consensus Levels in the current GNSO Working Group Guidelines, which form Annex I of the GNSO Operating Procedures, may require further clarification. 2. The GNSO Council requested that the Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation (SCI) consider: a. whether there should be modifications to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures to address the issues of waiving the deadline for submission of a motion and allowing the Council to vote outside a meeting; and b. whether the language relating to Consensus Levels in the GNSO Working Group Guidelines requires clarification. 3. The SCI developed language to be inserted in Section 3.3 (Notice of Meetings) of the GNSO Operating Procedures that provide for a waiver of the prescribed deadline for the submission of a new motion for voting by the GNSO Council in certain circumstances provided certain specified criteria are met. This recommendation will not affect the rules regarding the resubmission of a motion approved and added to section 4.3 of the GNSO Operating Procedures in March 2014. 4. In addition, the SCI developed procedures to be added as a new Section 4.10 (Voting Outside A Meeting) to the GNSO Operating Procedures that provide for the GNSO Council to be able to vote outside a meeting in certain circumstances provided certain specified criteria are met. 5. The SCI also developed clarifying language in the form of a footnote to be added to the Consensus Levels definitions in the GNSO Working Group Guidelines, pending a fuller review of all the GNSO Working Group Guidelines, which the SCI also recommends. 6. The revised GNSO Operating Procedures, including the proposed additions to the Working Group Guidelines, were put out for public comment for a period of a minimum of 21 days beginning on 17 September 2014 and ending on 08 October 2014 (see https://www.icann.org/public-comments/gnso-op-procedures-2014-09-17-en), as required by the ICANN Bylaws. 7. As there were no comments received in the public forum the SCI deemed that no further changes were necessary nor was a public comment reply period needed. RESOLVED 1. The GNSO Council adopts the revised Operating Procedures including the new provisions concerning the waiver of deadline for motions submitted for voting by the Council and the ability of the Council to vote outside a meeting - see https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/motion-waiver-proposal-16sep14-… and https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/outside-voting-proposal-16sep14… respectively; 2. The GNSO Council adopts the additional footnote language clarifying the Consensus Levels in the GNSO Working Group Guidelines - see https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/consensus-levels-proposal-16sep… 3. The GNSO Council thanks the SCI for its work on these matters and agrees to consider the SCI's request that the current language concerning Consensus Levels in the GNSO Working Group Guidelines be more fully reviewed and revised as part of a broader exercise in reviewing all the GNSO Operating Procedures, including the Working Group Guidelines; and 4. The GNSO Council instructs ICANN staff to post the new version of the GNSO Operating Procedures and GNSO Working Group Guidelines, effective immediately upon adoption. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

GNSO Council transcript posted
by Glen de Saint Géry 14 Nov '14

14 Nov '14

Dear Councillors, The GNSO Council transcript of the meeting held on 13 November 2014 has been published on page. http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov and can be directly viewed at: http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/transcript-council-13nov14-en.pdf Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

vote
by Edward Morris 14 Nov '14

14 Nov '14

* On Changes to GNSO Operating Procedures & Working Group Guidelines to Address Issues relating to Waiver of Motion Deadlines, GNSO Council Voting Outside a Council Meeting & Working Group Consensus Levels I vote: * [ x] Yes * [ ] No * [ ] Abstain * Password: white-0

1 0

MP3 recording GNSO Council 13 November 2014
by Glen de Saint Géry 13 Nov '14

13 Nov '14

[To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org] Please find the MP3 recording of the GNSO Council teleconference held on Thursday, 13 November 2014 at: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-council-20141113-en.mp3 And the Adobe chat transcript at: http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/transcript-chat-council-13nov14-en.pdf all on page http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov Thank you. Happy listening and reading! Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0