November 2016 - council - lists.icann.org

GNSO Review Implementation Plan
by Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben＠t-online.de Nov. 23, 2016

Nov. 23, 2016

Dear colleagues, I herewith introduce a motion to adopt the GNSO Review Implementation plan elaborated by the Review WG. Motion and implementation plan are attached. I'm happy to answer any question prior to the council call on 01 Dec. May I suggest to invite Jen Wolfe, chair of the WG, to the meeting. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich

3 2

Re: [council] Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy
by Michele Neylon - Blacknight Nov. 22, 2016

Nov. 22, 2016

James I’d obviously support that we proceed without a formal motion and submit the letter. Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains http://www.blacknight.host/ http://blacknight.blog/ http://www.blacknight.press - get our latest news & media coverage http://www.technology.ie Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Social: http://mneylon.social Random Stuff: http://michele.irish ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: <owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org> on behalf of James Bladel <jbladel(a)godaddy.com> Date: Tuesday 22 November 2016 at 03:28 To: Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell(a)endurance.com>, "council(a)gnso.icann.org" <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy Thanks, Darcy, for raising this motion. Councilors – as we discussed in Hyderabad, this request is coming from the Registrar Stakeholder Group, regarding the implementation of a very narrow element of IRTP-C. ICANN GDD Staff has indicated that they do not have the ability to agree to this request, absent a request from the GNSO Council and direction by the ICANN Board. Question for the Council: are there any questions or concerns on this topic, or is this relatively non-controversial? If the latter, then I would ask that we consider the short time frame before the Board’s next meeting (8 DEC) and ask if we can proceed without a formal motion and submit the letter. Interested in hearing your thoughts. Thanks— J. From: <owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell(a)endurance.com> Date: Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 17:41 To: GNSO Council List <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy All, Attached is the Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy along with a proposed draft communication. You will recall from our meetings in Hyderabad that ICANN GDD staff advised us that Council would need to submit this issue to the Board for consideration and further direction to ICANN staff. This motion and the draft communication were prepared based on that advice, and I’d appreciate this being heard at our December 1 meeting. Best, Darcy __________ Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart [tps://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/tjCmzaF_7ZGN1PtB2KAV5OVQn-Q_Xvh_p3zhR…]

1 0

Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy
by Darcy Southwell Nov. 20, 2016

Nov. 20, 2016

All, Attached is the Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy along with a proposed draft communication. You will recall from our meetings in Hyderabad that ICANN GDD staff advised us that Council would need to submit this issue to the Board for consideration and further direction to ICANN staff. This motion and the draft communication were prepared based on that advice, and I’d appreciate this being heard at our December 1 meeting. Best, Darcy __________ Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart

1 0

RE: [council] Request for input: GNSO Council meeting dates 2017
by policy＠paulmcgrady.com Nov. 20, 2016

Nov. 20, 2016

1 0

FW: [Soac-infoalert] Adopted Board Resolutions | Regular Meeting of the ICANN Board - ICANN
by James M. Bladel Nov. 18, 2016

Nov. 18, 2016

Colleagues – The second part of the Board meeting in India, adopted resolutions. Thanks— J. From: <soac-infoalert-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, November 18, 2016 at 8:53 Subject: [Soac-infoalert] Adopted Board Resolutions | Regular Meeting of the ICANN Board - ICANN Adopted Board Resolutions | Regular Meeting of the ICANN Board 08 Nov 2016 https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#1.d 1. Consent Agenda:<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#1> * Approval of Board Meeting Minutes<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#1.a> * Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) Member Appointments<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#1.b> * Rationale for Resolution 2016.11.08.02<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#1.…> * Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) Member Reappointments<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#1.c> * Rationale for Resolution 2016.11.08.03<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#1.…> * Appointment of D-, E-, G-, and H-Root Server Operator Representatives to the Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC)<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#1.d> * Rationale for Resolution 2016.11.08.04<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#1.…> * Investment of Auction Proceeds<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#1.e> * Rationale for Resolution 2016.11.08.05<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#1.…> * ICANN Delegation of Authority Guidelines<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#1.f> * Rationale for Resolution 2016.11.08.06<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#1.…> * Renewal of .TEL Registry Agreement<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#1.g> * Rationale for Resolution 2016.11.08.07<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#1.…> * Thank You to Community Members<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#1.h> * Thank You to Local Host of ICANN 57 Meeting<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#1.i> * Thank You to Sponsors of ICANN 57 Meeting<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#1.j> * Thank You to Interpreters, Staff, Event and Hotel Teams of ICANN 57 Meeting<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#1.k> 2. Main Agenda:<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#2> * Two-Character Domain Names in the New gTLD Namespace<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#2.a> * Rationale for Resolution 2016.11.08.15<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#2.…> * Consideration of the Corn Lake, LLC v. ICANN Independent Review Process Final Declaration<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#2.b> * Rationale for Resolutions 2016.11.08.16 – 2016.11.08.18<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#2.…> * Thank You to the Global Multistakeholder Community<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#2.c> * Thank You to Bruno Lanvin for his service to the ICANN Board<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#2.d> * Thank You to Erika Mann for her service to the ICANN Board<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#2.e> * Thank You to Kuo-Wei Wu for his service to the ICANN Board<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#2.f> * Thank You to Suzanne Woolf for her service to the ICANN Board<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#2.g> * Thank You to Bruce Tonkin for his service to the ICANN Board<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-11-08-en#2.h> --------------- David A. Olive Senior Vice President | Policy Development Support General Manager | ICANN Regional Headquarters | Istanbul david.olive(a)icann.org<mailto:david.olive@icann.org> ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers | Hakki Yeten Caddesi | Selenium Plaza | No:10/C K:10 | 34349 | Fulya | Besiktas | Istanbul Mobile +1. 202.341.3611 | Mobile +90.533.341.6550 | Direct Line +90.212.999.6212

1 0

FW: [Soac-infoalert] Adopted Board Resolutions | Organizational Meeting of the ICANN Board - ICANN
by James M. Bladel Nov. 18, 2016

Nov. 18, 2016

Councilors – For your review, please see below for a link to resolutions adopted by the Board in India. Thanks— J. From: <soac-infoalert-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, November 18, 2016 at 9:01 Subject: [Soac-infoalert] Adopted Board Resolutions | Organizational Meeting of the ICANN Board - ICANN Adopted Board Resolutions | Organizational Meeting of the ICANN Board 08 Nov 2016 https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2-2016-11-08-en 1. Main Agenda<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2-2016-11-08-en#1> * Election of ICANN Board Chair<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2-2016-11-08-en#…> * Election of ICANN Board Vice Chair<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2-2016-11-08-en#…> * Appointment of Membership of Board Committees<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2-2016-11-08-en#…> * Board-GAC Recommendation Implementation Working Group<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2-2016-11-08-en#…> * Board IDN Variant Working Group<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2-2016-11-08-en#…> * Board Working Group on Registration Directory Services<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2-2016-11-08-en#…> * Board Working Group on Internet Governance<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2-2016-11-08-en#…> * Confirmation of Officers of ICANN<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2-2016-11-08-en#…> * Confirmation of President of PTI<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2-2016-11-08-en#…> --------------- David A. Olive Senior Vice President | Policy Development Support General Manager | ICANN Regional Headquarters | Istanbul david.olive(a)icann.org<mailto:david.olive@icann.org> ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers | Hakki Yeten Caddesi | Selenium Plaza | No:10/C K:10 | 34349 | Fulya | Besiktas | Istanbul Mobile +1. 202.341.3611 | Mobile +90.533.341.6550 | Direct Line +90.212.999.6212

1 0

Re: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] ICANN57 Meeting Survey
by James M. Bladel Nov. 18, 2016

Nov. 18, 2016

Councilors – If you have a moment, please don’t forget about the ICANN57 Meeting Survey(s). We received quite a bit of feedback on the structure (esp. Constituency Day), and we want to make sure the GNSO position is heard. Thank you, J. From: <owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> Date: Monday, November 14, 2016 at 15:51 To: GNSO Council List <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] FW: [Soac-infoalert] ICANN57 Meeting Survey Dear All, FYI, please see message below. Please make sure to participate in the survey as it will help inform planning for future meetings (note that the ICANN Meeting Structure Survey includes a question on the future of Constituency Day). Best regards, Marika From: <soac-infoalert-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, November 11, 2016 at 3:49 AM To: "soac-infoalert(a)icann.org" <soac-infoalert(a)icann.org> Subject: [Soac-infoalert] ICANN57 Meeting Survey Please join in in taking these two surveys. One is on ICANN57 and the other is on the structure of ICANN. Soon we will be send additional information about the Community planning for ICANN58. Thank you for your participation on ICANN57. Regards. David https://meetingapp.icann.org/icann57/surveys/196636[meetingapp.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__meetingapp.icann.org_i…> Sent from my iPhone David A. Olive Senior Vice President, Policy Development Support General Manager, ICANN Regional Headquarters –Istanbul Hakki Yeten Cad. Selenium Plaza No:10/C K:10 34349<tel:10%2034349> Fulya, Besiktas, Istanbul Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct Line: +90.212.999.6212<tel:+90.212.999.6212> Mobile: + 1. 202.341.3611<tel:+%201.%20202.341.3611> Mobile: +90.533.341.6550<tel:+90.533.341.6550>

1 0

FW: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review
by James M. Bladel Nov. 18, 2016

Nov. 18, 2016

Council colleagues – See message below, and attached document from Margie. I know some (Susan?) have raised concerns with the draft Limited Scope for RDS Review, but do we think it is possible for us to gather and submit our feedback by 1 DEC? Thanks— J. From: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam(a)icann.org> Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 at 19:55 Subject: RE: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review Dear All, I understand from conversations in Hyderabad that you may need additional time to provide feedback from your SO/AC on the RDS Review Limited Scope Proposal. May I suggest a December 1st deadline for feedback? All the best, Margie _______ Margie Milam Vice President MSSI ICANN ________ From: Margie Milam Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 5:53 PM Subject: RE: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review Dear All- Here is a clean version of the Limited Scope Proposal, noting the change below. All the best, Margie From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca] Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2016 3:28 PM To: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam(a)icann.org>; Chris Disspain <chris(a)disspain.uk> Cc: Oscar A. Robles-Garay <oscar(a)lacnic.net>; Thomas Schneider <Thomas.Schneider(a)bakom.admin.ch>; Katrina Sataki <katrina(a)nic.lv>; James M. Bladel <jbladel(a)godaddy.com>; louie(a)louie.net; Patrik FÃ¤ltstrÃ¶m <patrik(a)frobbit.se>; tsinha(a)umd.edu; bverd(a)verisign.com; bruce.tonkin(a)melbourneit.com.au; cherine.chalaby(a)board.icann.org; erika(a)erikamann.com; markus.kummer(a)board.icann.org; steve.crocker(a)board.icann.org; rinalia.abdulrahim(a)board.icann.org; Rinalia Abdul Rahim (GMAIL) <rinalia.abdulrahim(a)gmail.com>; Goran Marby <goran.marby(a)icann.org>; Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund(a)icann.org>; Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi(a)icann.org>; David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org>; Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart(a)icann.org>; Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner(a)icann.org>; Erika Randall <erika.randall(a)icann.org>; Pamela Smith <pamela.smith(a)icann.org>; Karen Mulberry <karen.mulberry(a)icann.org>; Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> Subject: RE: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review For those trying to understand the proposal, note that there is an extraneous "not" in the 4th sub-bullet of Suggested Approach. It should read "... and to the extent that it is found to be insufficient or inaccurate...". Or alternately, it could read "... and to the extent that it is found to not be sufficient or accurate...". Alan At 02/11/2016 05:00 AM, Margie Milam wrote: Hi Chris & All- It seems the next step would be to determine the level of consensus to this draft proposal among the SO/AC leaders. Please kindly use the attached document, discuss it with your SO/AC, and reply by November 9th if there are any objections to moving forward with this proposal. All the best, Margie Milam From: Chris Disspain [mailto:chris@disspain.uk Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 2:02 PM Subject: Re: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review Sorry for not being clear. I mean what do we now need to do so we start to take the next steps? Cheers, Chris On 2 Nov 2016, at 08:30, Margie Milam <Margie.Milam(a)icann.org<mailto:Margie.Milam@icann.org> > wrote: Hi Chris- The next steps are listed in the Proposal: • Circulate proposal to SO/AC leadership to socialize with their respective SO/ACs • ; Discuss with Community in Hyderabad at the WHOIS High Interest Topic Session • SO/AC leadership to issue a public statement or a letter to ICANN CEO and Board Chair that explains why limited scope is appropriate and articulates that they have broad support of the ICANN community • Call for Volunteers to note limited scope & unique expertise sought • Reach out to the previous Review Team members and members of the Expert Working Group on Registration Directory Services, and encourage them to consider applying for the narrow scoped RDS Review Team • Propose a Charter for the RDS Review Team to adopt that tracks the limited Scope All the best, Margie From: Chris Disspain [mailto:chris@disspain.uk] Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 1:55 PM To: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam(a)icann.org<mailto:Margie.Milam@icann.org> > Cc: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> >; Oscar A. Robles-Garay <oscar(a)lacnic.net<mailto:oscar@lacnic.net>>; Thomas Schneider < Thomas.Schneider(a)bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Thomas.Schneider@bakom.admin.ch>>; Katrina Sataki <katrina(a)nic.lv<mailto:katrina@nic.lv>>; James M. Bladel <jbladel(a)godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>>; louie(a)louie.net<mailto:louie@louie.net>; Patrik FÃ¤ltstrÃ¶m <patrik(a)frobbit.se<mailto:patrik@frobbit.se>>; tsinha(a)umd.edu<mailto:tsinha@umd.edu>; bverd(a)verisign.com<mailto:bverd@verisign.com>; bruce.tonkin(a)melbourneit.com.au<mailto:bruce.tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>; cherine.chalaby(a)board.icann.org<mailto:cherine.chalaby@board.icann.org>; erika(a)erikamann.com<mailto:erika@erikamann.com>; markus.kummer(a)board.icann.org<mailto:markus.kummer@board.icann.org>; steve.crocker(a)board.icann.org<mailto:steve.crocker@board.icann.org>; rinalia.abdulrahim(a)board.icann.org<mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim@board.icann.org>; Rinalia Abdul Rahim (GMAIL) < rinalia.abdulrahim(a)gmail.com<mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim@gmail.com>>; Goran Marby <goran.marby(a)icann.org<mailto:goran.marby@icann.org>>; Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund(a)icann.org<mailto:jamie.hedlund@icann.org> >; Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi(a)icann.org<mailto:cyrus.namazi@icann.org> >; David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org<mailto:david.olive@icann.org>>; Theresa Swinehart < theresa.swinehart(a)icann.org<mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>; Samantha Eisner < Samantha.Eisner(a)icann.org<mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org>>; Erika Randall <erika.randall(a)icann.org<mailto:erika.randall@icann.org> >; Pamela Smith <pamela.smith(a)icann.org<mailto:pamela.smith@icann.org> >; Karen Mulberry <karen.mulberry(a)icann.org<mailto:karen.mulberry@icann.org> >; Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> > Subject: Re: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review OK…¦. What are our next steps please Margie? Cheers, Chris On 2 Nov 2016, at 08:19, Margie Milam <Margie.Milam(a)icann.org<mailto:Margie.Milam@icann.org> > wrote: Dear All- Please see the attached document, which includes Alanâ€™s revision. Thanks, Margie From: Alan Greenberg [ mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca] Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2016 3:42 AM To: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam(a)icann.org<mailto:Margie.Milam@icann.org> >; chris(a)disspain.id.au<mailto:chris@disspain.id.au>; Oscar A. Robles-Garay <oscar(a)lacnic.net<mailto:oscar@lacnic.net>>; Thomas Schneider < Thomas.Schneider(a)bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Thomas.Schneider@bakom.admin.ch>>; Katrina Sataki <katrina(a)nic.lv<mailto:katrina@nic.lv>>; jbladel(a)godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>; louie(a)louie.net<mailto:louie@louie.net>; Patrik FÃƒÂ¤ltstrÃƒÂ¶m <patrik(a)frobbit.se<mailto:patrik@frobbit.se> >;tsinha(a)umd.edu<mailto:tsinha@umd.edu>; bverd(a)verisign.com<mailto:bverd@verisign.com>; bruce.tonkin(a)melbourneit.com.au<mailto:bruce.tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>; cherine.chalaby(a)board.icann.org<mailto:cherine.chalaby@board.icann.org>; erika(a)erikamann.com<mailto:erika@erikamann.com>; markus.kummer(a)board.icann.org<mailto:markus.kummer@board.icann.org>; steve.crocker(a)board.icann.org<mailto:steve.crocker@board.icann.org>; rinalia.abdulrahim(a)board.icann.org<mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim@board.icann.org>; Rinalia Abdul Rahim (GMAIL) < rinalia.abdulrahim(a)gmail.com<mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim@gmail.com>>; Goran Marby <goran.marby(a)icann.org<mailto:goran.marby@icann.org>>; Chris Disspain <chris(a)disspain.uk<mailto:chris@disspain.uk>> Cc: Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund(a)icann.org<mailto:jamie.hedlund@icann.org> >; Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi(a)icann.org<mailto:cyrus.namazi@icann.org> >; David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org<mailto:david.olive@icann.org>>; Theresa Swinehart < theresa.swinehart(a)icann.org<mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>; Samantha Eisner < Samantha.Eisner(a)icann.org<mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org>>; Erika Randall <erika.randall(a)icann.org<mailto:erika.randall@icann.org> >; Pamela Smith <pamela.smith(a)icann.org<mailto:pamela.smith@icann.org> >; Karen Mulberry <karen.mulberry(a)icann.org<mailto:karen.mulberry@icann.org> >; Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> > Subject: Re: Draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review One more thought. It are some items which were recommended but were rejected (or more likely transformed into some other form), so I would add one more option to the 2nd bullet. Specifically: o Requesting the ICANN organization to do a "self-assessment" reporting on a) the extent to which each recommendation was followed and/or implemented; b) the effectiveness in addressing the issues identified by the First WHOIS Review Team; and c) the need for additional implementation. Alan At 28/10/2016 03:37 PM, Margie Milam wrote: Dear All, Please find attached the draft Proposal for a Limited Scope RDS Review. As I did not receive any suggested revisions, it is unchanged from the document circulated earlier. Safe travels & see you in India! Margie From: Margie Milam Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 10:03 PM To: 'chris(a)disspain.id.au<mailto:chris@disspain.id.au>' <chris(a)disspain.id.au<mailto:chris@disspain.id.au>>; 'Oscar A. Robles-Garay' <oscar(a)lacnic.net<mailto:oscar@lacnic.net>>; 'Thomas Schneider' < Thomas.Schneider(a)bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Thomas.Schneider@bakom.admin.ch>>; 'Katrina Sataki' <katrina(a)nic.lv<mailto:katrina@nic.lv>>; 'jbladel(a)godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>' <jbladel(a)godaddy.com<mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com>>; 'louie(a)louie.net<mailto:louie@louie.net>' <louie(a)louie.net<mailto:louie@louie.net>>; 'alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>' <alan.greenberg(a)mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> >; 'Patrik FÃƒÂ¤ltstrÃƒÂ¶m' <patrik(a)frobbit.se<mailto:patrik@frobbit.se>>; 'tsinha(a)umd.edu<mailto:tsinha@umd.edu>' <tsinha(a)umd.edu<mailto:tsinha@umd.edu>>; 'bverd(a)verisign.com<mailto:bverd@verisign.com>' <bverd(a)verisign.com<mailto:bverd@verisign.com>>; bruce.tonkin(a)melbourneit.com.au<mailto:bruce.tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>; ' cherine.chalaby(a)board.icann.org<mailto:cherine.chalaby@board.icann.org>' < cherine.chalaby(a)board.icann.org<mailto:cherine.chalaby@board.icann.org> >;erika(a)erikamann.com<mailto:erika@erikamann.com>; ' markus.kummer(a)board.icann.org<mailto:markus.kummer@board.icann.org>' < markus.kummer(a)board.icann.org<mailto:markus.kummer@board.icann.org>>; ' steve.crocker(a)board.icann.org<mailto:steve.crocker@board.icann.org>' < steve.crocker(a)board.icann.org<mailto:steve.crocker@board.icann.org>>; ' rinalia.abdulrahim(a)board.icann.org<mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim@board.icann.org>' < rinalia.abdulrahim(a)board.icann.org<mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim@board.icann.org>>; Rinalia Abdul Rahim (GMAIL) < rinalia.abdulrahim(a)gmail.com<mailto:rinalia.abdulrahim@gmail.com>>; Goran Marby <goran.marby(a)icann.org<mailto:goran.marby@icann.org>>; 'Chris Disspain' <chris(a)disspain.uk<mailto:chris@disspain.uk>> Cc: 'Board-Ops-Team(a)icann.org<mailto:Board-Ops-Team@icann.org>' <Board-Ops-Team(a)icann.org<mailto:Board-Ops-Team@icann.org> >; Lauren Allison <lauren.allison(a)icann.org<mailto:lauren.allison@icann.org> >; Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund(a)icann.org<mailto:jamie.hedlund@icann.org> >; Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi(a)icann.org<mailto:cyrus.namazi@icann.org> >; David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org<mailto:david.olive@icann.org>>; Theresa Swinehart < theresa.swinehart(a)icann.org<mailto:theresa.swinehart@icann.org>>; Samantha Eisner < Samantha.Eisner(a)icann.org<mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org>>; Erika Randall <erika.randall(a)icann.org<mailto:erika.randall@icann.org> >; Pamela Smith <pamela.smith(a)icann.org<mailto:pamela.smith@icann.org> >; Karen Mulberry <karen.mulberry(a)icann.org<mailto:karen.mulberry@icann.org> > Subject: RE: Request to SO/AC Leadership from Chris Disspain Dear All, I would like to provide you an update on the next steps for the Registration Directory Services Review (WHOIS-2), following the Oct 13th telephone call: Ã‚Â· As discussed, Alan Greenberg and I developed the attached strawman proposal for a limited scope Registration Directory Services Review. Ã‚Â· Please kindly review the attached proposal, and provide any initial comments by the close of business on Thursday Oct 27th, and a revised version will be circulated on Friday Oct 28th. Ã‚Â· Any additional comments on your SO/ACÃ¢€™s perspective on this to topic can be shared at the High Interest Topic Session on WHOIS in Hyderabad on Sat, November 5th Ã‚Â· Also, please note we plan to publish the Call for Volunteers for the RDS Review on Friday Oct 28th. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best Personal Regards, Margie _________ Margie Milam Vice President- Multistakeholder Strategy & Strategic Initiatives _________ Content-Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document; name="Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v2.docx" Content-Description: Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v2.docx Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v2.docx"; size=21322; creation-date="Mon, 24 Oct 2016 21:11:17 GMT"; modification-date="Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:54:25 GMT" X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1;DM5PR03MB2714;9:z7ZJzyqUUhIV+rYbm7ztXWmOEEIDUYAHsz5qugLtCKtYQygfhnnl7ZjXQLIS1yiJ0LlMsLOv78pLzHgtMNiID0ZtC41jLF2QHIcLuWyey8kE9RF/VT66y4CAXpAekS8UPRfQUw9mztYMiqHq/N6aKk3oqE/RccLM4DXEbPCPTvu+B63ymxG1sBnYwhZhlP/9dwWjaLPrnexlkKb2rXrrqrLkUga9rLSjKVHP8muYXEL/RIhVBL6HI9ZE9JjxS6OdSGbfaR3oW4lHBcgi40bkNrnfBZ/AgSHBe7v9Z8PRAqGOOFtlRkFkVWjfLUBKZlvOxAel/ywgTqVsAA7TdUlocnWbswVevP+4tHssI3+gAZsBXsj5OXmhCagDwnevkRtNuO7bwHbKFX4TYpD+cXltc0A2SbIXPMf97jtNZv9HO48m05uhm6QLRonkxCVMR1ue X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery: ex:0;auth:0;dest:I;ENG:(20160514016)(520000050)(520002050)(750028); <Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v3-2-11-16.docx> Content-Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document; name="Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v3-2-11-16.docx" Content-Description: Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v3-2-11-16.docx Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Proposal for a Limited Scope of the RDS - v3-2-11-16.docx"; size=21060; creation-date="Wed, 02 Nov 2016 08:12:57 GMT"; modification-date="Wed, 02 Nov 2016 08:13:07 GMT" X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1;DM5PR03MB2714;9:XkUawjzAAaJU4j1DR3X1unwaSCiumewwnDInu8vzdDiC8jqg0dUg0X9sa2HVdmRY5OT/AE2CmmnyZWG1uMqEUWhiAFW0iOPKB6XAUpvnSOe2mrgLJ8yp5KY0K+DBjA8RxtJQiJ1mZeYG/LZKh03Bunhh8CmvHFYesEGOaORs0KLmKIiA4m5//+YuJSdDAAswMFBHovg1RTPeH+qqJh5wdo8IDd5q+xQJ47/kleB1iCmv02mItqjWr2gaI7yLkheIj93sXoeeYz61fitLAis5+rVhvZjlOLEUubSqCaqabIZbAmPL8DDQcEjJon/HKKAOQSvzd65o3W3UcgPaj0AcuvErjxMNzg4KaIM6PRyNkFduCOhItAVFVqUfIwQ3mSXyKpR53o9E6pHLQDhhSB/ciwgtUzFVF5fclTf6nB7zmS/FaGQBgbECT6ATbUyF0htN X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery: ex:0;auth:0;dest:I;ENG:(20160514016)(520000050)(520002050)(750028);

1 0

FW: CCWG-Acct SO/AC Questions
by James M. Bladel Nov. 18, 2016

Nov. 18, 2016

Council Colleagues – Please see below for a request from the CCWG-WS2 Co-Chairs, seeking feedback on how each SO/AC (and component organizations) maintain internal accountability. I apologize for the delay in submitting this to the list. If there are no objections, I will work with Heather, Donna and Staff to draft a response. But please feel free to share this request with your SG/C leadership, and relay their feedback as well. Note that the CCWG co-chairs are looking for a response in early December, so thanks for giving this your attention. Thank You, J. From: Karen Mulberry <karen.mulberry(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, November 4, 2016 at 4:22 Subject: CCWG-Acct SO/AC Questions Sent on behalf of the CCWG-Accountability WS2 Co-Chair’s Dear SO/AC Chairs, As you are aware, the newly-adopted ICANN bylaws tasked our Cross Community Working Group to investigate several issues as part of our Work Stream 2 effort. SO/AC Accountability is one of these items. As part of this effort, we have set up a subgroup, responsible for reviewing how each SO and AC is accountable to its designated community, and potentially to global Internet stakeholders as well. The background and progress for this group are described here[docs.google.com]. As part of this effort, the group intends to start by an assessment of the current situation. That’s why we are turning to you to point us to resources and documents used to maintain accountability to your respective designated community, taking into account the particular or specific working modalities of each SO/AC (and any subgroups). We would appreciate if you could provide responses to the attached questions within the next 30 days, so that work on this important item of WS2 can proceed in due course. Responses can be provided to acct-staff(a)icann.org. Along with the rapporteurs of the SO/AC accountability subgroup, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Farzaneh Badii and Steve Del Bianco, we thank you in advance and remain available for any clarification that you may need. Best regards, Leon, Thomas & Mathieu

1 0

Document and Motion deadline Monday, 21 November 2016 at 23:59 UTC for the GNSO Council Meeting 1 December 2016 at 21:00 UTC
by Glen de Saint Géry Nov. 17, 2016

Nov. 17, 2016

Dear Councillors, Reports, motions and documents for consideration are due no later than (NLT) 10 days in advance (i.e. MONDAY, 21 November 2016 at 23:59 UTC) of the GNSO Council Meeting on 1 December 2016 at 21:00 UTC. Motions should be sent to the Council mailing list and will then be posted on the Wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+1+December+… Thank you very much. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org[gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_&d=DQMFA…> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses[learn.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses…> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages[gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gn…>.

1 0