February 2020 - council - lists.icann.org

ICANN67 Update
by Nathalie Peregrine Feb. 20, 2020

Feb. 20, 2020

Dear all, ICANN org will provide a short update and answer questions about ICANN67 today at 18:00 UTC. Please join: https://icann.zoom.us/my/icann67prepweek ICANN org will continue to make further announcements as circumstances warrant. Thank you.

1 0

Post call: Pre-ICANN67 GNSO Policy Webinar / Wednesday, 19 February 2020
by Nathalie Peregrine Feb. 20, 2020

Feb. 20, 2020

Dear all, Please find the Zoom recording below for the Pre-ICANN67 GNSO Policy Webinar held on Wednesday, 19 February 2020 at 21:00 UTC. Zoom Recording: https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/tZQod-mrrm83HtWUtASDCvRxW9S8faOs2nAb__FbnUq2… Kind regards, Nathalie

1 0

ICANN67 - Constituency Sessions - Areas of interest from the Board
by Rafik Dammak Feb. 20, 2020

Feb. 20, 2020

Hi all, please find below the topics suggested by board for the council-board meeting in Cancun. we should suggest topics from our side we want to discuss with them. We have to reply by 24th February. Best, Rafik *From: *SO-AC-SG-CLeaders <so-ac-sg-cleaders-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Vinciane Koenigsfeld <vinciane.koenigsfeld(a)icann.org> *Date: *Monday, February 3, 2020 at 8:47 PM *To: *"so-ac-sg-cleaders(a)icann.org" <so-ac-sg-cleaders(a)icann.org> *Cc: *"icann-board(a)icann.org" <icann-board(a)icann.org>, Board Ops Team < board-ops-team(a)icann.org> *Subject: *[ICANN Community Leaders] ICANN67 - Constituency Sessions - Areas of interest from the Board Dear Constituency and Stakeholder Groups Chairs, *Please reply no later than Monday 24 February 2020* Our first meeting of the year is approaching fast! The Board and I are very much looking forward to engaging with you during our Community Forum in Cancun, which is taking place from 7-12 March 2020. As we continue working with you on the format of our engagement with your groups, we would like to experiment a new way of interacting by offering you to choose one or two area(s) of interest and having an open discussion with the Board on those, instead of asking you to come up with specific questions. We are also suggesting that the list of areas of interest be shared with the entire Community using the Policy digest, in order to increase transparency and allow the groups to improve their own understanding of their peers’ point of views on different issues. As for time allocation, we propose to allocate the first part of our time together to be spent on your specific areas of interest, and to allow sufficient time to address the areas of interest indicated by the Board, if they have not been covered by that time. In preparation for our meetings, the Board proposes the following areas of interest to have an open discussion with you: 1. Key priorities for action of ICANN constituencies in 2020 (e.g. prioritization of recommendations, streamlining of reviews, improve effectiveness of ICANN’s multistakeholder model, …) 2. Specific developments coming up that ICANN constituencies feel need to be addressed when updating the ICANN Strategic Plan. We would be very grateful if you could send Board Operations ( board-ops-team(a)icann.org) your area(s) of interest, in order of priority, no later than *Monday 24 February 2020.* So you are aware, we are not changing the current total time allotted per group. We look forward to hearing your thoughts on our suggestions and on how to further improve our interaction. We thank you in advance for your time on this matter and we look forward to welcoming you in Mexico! Best regards, Maarten Botterman Chair, ICANN Board of Directors

2 4

ICANN to Hold First-Ever Remote Public Meeting - ICANN
by Drazek, Keith Feb. 20, 2020

Feb. 20, 2020

Hi all, ICANN 67 will be remote participation only: https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2020-02-19-en Thanks, Keith

1 0

FOR ALL COUNCILORS: ON NOW PLEASE JOIN** Meeting invitation: Pre-ICANN67 GNSO Policy Webinar / Wednesday, 19 February 2020 at 21:00 UTC
by Nathalie Peregrine Feb. 19, 2020

Feb. 19, 2020

Dear all, At the request of Council leadership, ICANN’s GNSO Policy Development Support Team is pleased to hold a Pre-ICANN67 GNSO Policy Webinar which will be held on Wednesday, 19 February 2020 at 21:00 UTC for 90 minutes. For other times: https://tinyurl.com/waz5xsh [tinyurl.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tinyurl.com_waz5xsh&d=…> Due to the truncated schedule, this webinar is designed to serve as a replacement for the previously-offered GNSO PDP updates provided during the GNSO weekend sessions. The webinar will include presentations from the leadership of requested Working Groups and will provide participants an opportunity to receive a more detailed briefing on the status of GNSO policy development activities, specifically focused on the current issues before the WG as well as what the WG is expected to focus on during the upcoming ICANN meeting. Join Zoom Meeting: https://icann.zoom.us/my/icann67prepweek [icann.zoom.us]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icann.zoom.us_my_icann…> Meeting ID: 341 011 0459 Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/aMC4tb58S [zoom.us]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__zoom.us_u_aMC4tb58S&d=…> You will have VoIP and telecom bridge audio options available to you upon logging in if needed. Thank you in advance for reserving this time in your schedule. Slides to assist you with Zoom: Welcome to Zoom: https://icann.box.com/shared/static/1sal3l5qf4csdukt0pk2c75ey3bte22z.pdf [icann.box.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icann.box.com_shared_s…> Zoom FAQ: https://icann.box.com/shared/static/d5rap0g6xphevhkdd3mhu2hy753l2m3s.pdf [icann.box.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icann.box.com_shared_s…> If Zoom disappears, see instructions: https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2019/presentation/disappe…<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_d…> A calendar invitation is available here as an attachment for you to download to your calendar. Kind regards, Terri

1 0

FW: Wave 1 of the EPDP Phase 1 recommendation 27 Impact
by Drazek, Keith Feb. 19, 2020

Feb. 19, 2020

Hi all, Please see the updated Rec 27 Wave 1 report from ICANN Org. This is an important input for our prioritization discussions. Thanks, Keith From: Karen Lentz <karen.lentz(a)icann.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 11:36 AM To: Drazek, Keith <kdrazek(a)verisign.com>; rafik.dammak(a)gmail.com; Pam Little <pam.little(a)alibaba-inc.com> Cc: Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org>; Steve Chan <steve.chan(a)icann.org>; Russ Weinstein <russ.weinstein(a)icann.org>; Dennis Chang <dennis.chang(a)icann.org>; Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi(a)icann.org>; Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen(a)icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Wave 1 of the EPDP Phase 1 recommendation 27 Impact Dear Keith, Pam, Rafik, Further to Cyrus’s note below, I am attaching an updated version of the EPDP Recommendation 27 Wave 1 Report. As described below, we shared the draft version of this report on 13 January with the Phase 1 Implementation Review Team (IRT) for any feedback in advance of forwarding the report to the GNSO Council, as well as with GNSO Council leadership for your information. The text has been updated to reflect that the report has been reviewed by the IRT, and to note in section 3.11.2 the 26 January Board resolution<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2020-01-26-en#1.b> approving the GNSO Council’s request to defer compliance enforcement of the Gaining Registrar Form of Authorization (FOA) requirement pending the GNSO's planned Transfer Policy review. IRT members have not suggested any additional changes and accordingly I am sharing the attached. As a reminder, the identified impact areas in this report are being delivered to the GNSO Council as they concern existing consensus policies or procedures being currently addressed in GNSO policy work. The Recommendation 27 Wave 2 Report, targeted for completion in June, covers the identified impacts on other items including (non-policy) procedures (e.g., Trademark Clearinghouse, data escrow processes) and is current work in progress. The Wave 2 report will also include analysis on the Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Issues (PPSAI) and Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information policy recommendations, for which implementation has been started but not completed. These will likely be relevant to the GNSO Council’s work as well. Please let us know of any additional questions. Best regards, Karen -- Karen Lentz Senior Director, Policy Research & Data Services Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Mobile: +1 310 895 3637 www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org> From: Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi(a)icann.org<mailto:cyrus.namazi@icann.org>> Date: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 at 6:32 AM To: Keith' 'Drazek <kdrazek(a)verisign.com<mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com>>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak(a)gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>>, Pam Little <pam.little(a)alibaba-inc.com<mailto:pam.little@alibaba-inc.com>> Cc: Karen Lentz <karen.lentz(a)icann.org<mailto:karen.lentz@icann.org>>, Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>>, Steve Chan <steve.chan(a)icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org>>, Russ Weinstein <russ.weinstein(a)icann.org<mailto:russ.weinstein@icann.org>>, Dennis Chang <dennis.chang(a)icann.org<mailto:dennis.chang@icann.org>> Subject: Wave 1 of the EPDP Phase 1 recommendation 27 Impact Dear Keith, Rafik, Pam, I am attaching for your information the draft report for Wave 1 of the EPDP Phase 1 recommendation 27, impacted policies and procedures. Please note that this is in draft form and we are sharing with the Implementation Review Team which may result in some changes to the report. However, we expect it will also be useful to planning the GNSO’s upcoming work. Some summary points are below: * The EPDP Phase 1 Recommendation 27 specified the need to identify and address all policies and procedures that might be affected by the EPDP Phase 1 policy recommendations and the new Registration Data Policy. * ICANN org has performed a detailed review of a set of existing policies and procedures and has drafted this Wave 1 report, which provides an analysis of the impacted areas identified as well as potential changes to address the impact. * Impacts may include outdated provision language, higher-level issues such as the relevance or inconsistency of an existing policy or procedure with the new Registration Data Policy, or implications for existing contractual provisions. * It is important to note that this work will be completed in two waves, based on priority. A follow-up to this report (Wave 2) will cover the relevant (non-policy) procedures (e.g., Data Escrow, Trademark Clearinghouse). * The Wave 1 draft report includes an analysis of the 15 policies or procedures listed below and identifies the level of impact of the policy recommendations, which can be put in rough buckets as follows: High Impact ••••••• Registry Registration Data Directory Services Consistent Labeling and Display Policy<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rdds-labeling-policy-2017-02-01-en> ••••••• Thick RDDS (Whois) Transition Policy for .COM, .NET and .JOBS<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/thick-whois-transition-policy-2017-02…> ••••••• Transfer Policy<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/transfers> ••••••• Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy<https://www.icann.org/en/help/dndr/udrp> (UDRP) (Rules) ••••••• Uniform Rapid Suspension<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/urs-2014-01-09-en> (URS) Medium Impact ••••••• Expired Domain Deletion Policy<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/accreditation/eddp> (EDDP) ••••••• Whois Data Reminder Policy<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/consensus-policies/wdrp> (WDRP) Low Impact ••••••• AGP Limits Policy<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/agp/agp-policy-17dec08-en.htm> ••••••• Additional Whois Information Policy<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/policy-awip-2014-07-02-en>(AGP) ••••••• Expired Registration Recovery Policy<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/consensus-policies/errp>(ERRP) ••••••• Protection of IGO and INGO Identifier in All gTLDs Policy<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/igo-ingo-protection-policy-2018-01-16…> ••••••• Registry Services Evaluation Policy<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registries/rsep/policy> (RSEP) ••••••• Restored Names Accuracy Policy<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/consensus-policies/rnap> (RNAP) ••••••• Revised ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/whois-privacy-conflicts-procedure-200…> ••••••• Whois Marketing Restriction Policy<https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/registrars/consensus-policies/wmrp-en> Next steps: ••••••• The impacts for the items described in the Wave 1 report appear to be within the remit of the GNSO, as they are either consensus policies or, in the case of URS, currently being considered in a GNSO policy development process. ••••••• The draft report is being shared with the EPDP Phase 1 Implementation Review Team (IRT) currently working with ICANN org on implementation of the policy recommendations, for completeness and validation that the GNSO is the appropriate path for the items included in the report. ••••••• Following this review step, the report, with any updates from the IRT review, will be submitted to the GNSO Council who will then determine next steps (e.g., Expedited Policy Development Process, GNSO Guidance Process, etc.). We appreciate this recommendation on the part of the EPDP Team as it has been very instructive to undertake this exercise. From a process perspective, this effort also suggests that the ICANN procedures for developing, approving, and implementing a new policy may lack a mechanism for transparently identifying and resolving any conflicts or impacts on existing policies and procedures where they apply. We believe this an important discussion for the community to undertake. We will look forward to the engagement of GNSO stakeholders in this dialogue. Please let us know of any other assistance we can provide. Cheers, Cyrus Namazi Sr. Vice President | Global Domains Division 801 17th St NW, Suite 400 | Washington, DC 20006 USA +1.202.249.7543 Office | +1.408.421.6894 Mobile | cyrus.namazi(a)icann.org<mailto:cyrus.namazi@icann.org> www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>

1 0

Please read: preparation for GNSO Council meeting Thursday 20 February 2020 at 21:00 UTC
by Nathalie Peregrine Feb. 19, 2020

Feb. 19, 2020

Dear all, In preparation for the GNSO Council meeting scheduled for Thursday 20 February 2020 at 21:00 UTC, please read below: * There are few open AIs for the GNSO Council to consider with immediate deadlines, but the AIs arising from the Strategic Planning Session in LA have been added at the bottom of the page<https://community.icann.org/x/RgZlAg>. * There will be a full agenda item (30 minutes) dedicated to the Project List, the updated version can be find here<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/projects-…>. Please ensure to go over it to prepare for the discussion. * There is no Consent Agenda item, but one Council vote on the PDP3.0 Implementation Final Report motion<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+20+February…>. Please note John McElwaine has proposed<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2020-February/023532.html> a friendly amendment. * GNSO Council liaisons to the RPM and SubPro PDP WGs will be called upon for agenda items 5 and 6 regarding the respective Project Change Requests (PCR) submitted by these groups. * The full GNSO Council agenda can be found here<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Final+Proposed+Agen…>. * Supporting documents can be found here<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Documents+20+Februa…> Thank you! Kind regards, Nathalie Nathalie Peregrine Manager, Operations Support (GNSO) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann Find out more about the GNSO by visiting: https://learn.icann.org/ <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__learn.icann.org_&d=DwM…> Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ICANN-5FGN…> Transcripts and recordings of GNSO Working Group and Council events are located on the GNSO Master Calendar <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_grou…>

1 0

Motion for PDP 3.0 Implementation Final Report
by Rafik Dammak Feb. 19, 2020

Feb. 19, 2020

Hi all, I am happy to submit for GNSO council consideration the PDP 3.0 implementation final report and motion for council vote. I would like to thank again the implementation team members and staff for their participation and support to deliver the PDP 3.0 improvements. Best regards, Rafik

4 4

2020 GNSO Council Strategic Planning Session Report
by Steve Chan Feb. 18, 2020

Feb. 18, 2020

Dear Councilors, Attached, please find the report from the 2020 GNSO Council Strategic Planning Session, which seeks to capture objectives, discussions, agreements and action items across the three days of the meeting. This document was prepared in collaboration between Council leadership, Heather, and staff. Consistent with the practice from past SPS meetings, the report will be added to the GNSO calendar page. Best, Steve Steven Chan  Policy Director, GNSO Support Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536  Email: steve.chan(a)icann.org Skype: steve.chan55 Mobile: +1.310.339.4410 Find out more about the GNSO by visiting: https://learn.icann.org/ Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Transcripts and recordings of GNSO Working Group and Council events are located on the GNSO Master Calendar

1 0

FW: [ICANN Community Leaders] FW: ICANN67 Discussion Call Materials | 18 February 2020 at 17:00 UTC
by Drazek, Keith Feb. 18, 2020

Feb. 18, 2020

Hi all, ICANN convened a call today with SO/AC/SG/C leaders and Goran, Maarten and other ICANN staff to discuss the upcoming ICANN meeting in Cancun, and more specifically the potential impact of the coronavirus on our ability to meet in person. The ICANN Board has a special meeting scheduled for 2000 UTC on Wednesday to discuss the matter further. The Zoom recording of the session is below for anyone who would like to listen. It is clear to me that ICANN’s leadership is taking this situation seriously and is trying to find the right balance under challenging and uncertain circumstances. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Best, Keith From: SO-AC-SG-CLeaders <so-ac-sg-cleaders-bounces(a)icann.org> On Behalf Of David Olive Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2020 2:11 PM To: so-ac-sg-cleaders(a)icann.org Cc: Goran Marby <goran.marby(a)icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ICANN Community Leaders] FW: ICANN67 Discussion Call Materials | 18 February 2020 at 17:00 UTC Dear Community Leaders and Representatives: Enclosed are the call materials from the ICANN67 Discussion call held on Tuesday, 18 February 2020. Zoom Recording: https://icann.zoom.us/rec/share/2eZHBLjf_35LWtKV8B_TXIUhA4nIX6a8gCJI-acIzx2… Transcript will be sent upon receipt. I will also be sending you a follow-up note shortly. Best regards, David _____________________ Chat: 11:33:31 From Ria Otanes : Welcome to the ICANN67 Discussion Call on 18 February 2020 at 17:00 UTC. 11:59:43 From Goran Marby : Hi all 12:00:41 From Ria Otanes : Hello everyone, welcome. We will get started in just another minute 12:01:27 From A-Eduardo Diaz : I do not have audio at the moment so will be in listening mode 12:05:44 From Ole : Has it started yet? I hear nothing. 12:05:57 From Fred Baker : yes 12:05:59 From Katrina Sataki (ccNSO) : yes, started. I hear very well 12:06:02 From Lito Ibarra : Yes. Goran is speaking 12:06:28 From Ria Otanes : @Ole, could you try reconnecting? 12:07:37 From Fred Baker : My suggestion re coronavirus: have the meeting, but have ICANN bring/provide appropriate face masks for those that wish to wear them. 12:09:12 From Ole : I hear now, thanks! 12:09:12 From Katrina Sataki (ccNSO) : and hand sanitizers everywhere 12:12:38 From Donna Austin, Neustar : everyone will have their temperature taken every day? just trying to qualify? 12:12:44 From Donna Austin, Neustar : clarify 12:13:23 From Becky Burr, Board : @Fred https://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/do-face-masks-prevent-corona… 12:16:20 From Keith Drazek (Verisign) : I have joined the Zoom room. 12:17:00 From Dean Marks : Is there recognition that in the last day or two coronavirus has been determined to be significantly more lethal than the "normal" influeneza? 12:17:01 From Bruna Santos : Q: What about the cases that can potentially be brought to the region? thinking about Asymptomatic transmission. 12:17:13 From Chris Disspain : @ Fred…It seems that masks don’t work… 12:17:47 From Robin Gross : what happens when one has a high temperature? 12:17:53 From Heather Forrest : QUESTION: What is the last day on which ICANN would make a decision to cancel the meeting? 12:18:42 From Robin Gross : QUESTION: what happens when one has a high temperature? 12:19:03 From Susan Payne SCA : QUESTION - in a cruise-ship type scenario, how readily is the local Mexican health service able to cope? 12:19:05 From Keith Drazek (Verisign) : Good question, Heather, I was going to ask the same thing. As a follow up, is the Board's meeting on Wednesday intended to be decisional on this question, or just a discussion? 12:19:22 From Robin Gross : gloves could be distributed as well. 12:20:40 From Susan Payne SCA : QUESTION - what volume of remote participation can you accommodate for individual sessions, if people are reluctant to attend? and can ICANN still run the meeting if large numbers of staff are reluctant to travel? 12:21:58 From Dean Marks : Question: I read in several leading newspapers (the Guardian, NY Times, etc.) that the mortality rate of coronavirus is 2.3%, whereas the last flu virus in the U.S. it was 0.1%. This included the New York Times. Is Dr. Alvaro saying that those reports are incorrect? 12:22:20 From Donna Austin, Neustar : QUESTION: And what happens next to the person, and the meeting, if it is the virus? 12:24:14 From Bruna Santos : Question: Board will also assess the meeting I 12:24:27 From Katrina Sataki (ccNSO) : ccTLDs are ready to come to the meeting 12:24:38 From Maureen Hilyard (ALAC) : At-Large discussions indicate that our members believe the that as the LAC region is not a risk area, the meeting should proceed 12:24:50 From Bruna Santos : *Question: Board will also assess the meeting in Kuala Lumpur ? or the decision for now will be specifically on Cancun 12:24:56 From Jay Sudowski : NomCom members have no concerns about attending 12:25:31 From Robin Gross : NCSG is not in favor of canceling or moving the meeting either. 12:25:53 From Bruna Santos : NCUC also has support for the meeting, few general concerns about possible local health measures but no objections! 12:28:40 From Donna Austin, Neustar : That doesn't answer the impact on the meeting, I expect if there is one instance of the virus detected it will make others very nervous. Will there be a lockdown scenario? 12:28:51 From Graeme Bunton : RrSG still supports having the meeting. Questions about the KL meeting in June though. 12:32:58 From Dean Marks : Thank you Dr. Alvaro. 12:33:45 From Bruna Santos : Question: Will the situation affect community engagement events? eg. gala and other social... 12:35:17 From Susan Payne SCA : I wonder if Dr Alvaro could circle back to the Question on capacity of the Mexican health authorities please? 12:35:53 From Jay Sudowski : Q: If the Board decides to cancel or reschedule the meeting tomorrow, how quickly will that be communicated to the community? 12:37:50 From Katrina Sataki (ccNSO) : Q: at what time is the Board call scheduled? 12:38:11 From Chris Disspain : 2000 utc 12:38:17 From Katrina Sataki (ccNSO) : thank you! 12:38:33 From Donna Austin, Neustar : Is there a level of attendance required to make the meeting viable? 12:39:13 From Susan Payne SCA : Question - are there any restrictions by Mexico, or ICANN on travellers from particular countries or regions. I think there are not... 12:40:16 From Chris Disspain : Susan - I believe not at this stage 12:40:21 From David Olive : Manal. You are next. 12:40:25 From David Olive : Sorry I miss your hand 12:41:16 From Chris Disspain : Simon - could you clarify that please - ICANN is not currently attempting to prevent participants from china attending - right`/ 12:41:28 From Chris Disspain : You meant staff are restricted 12:41:36 From Heather Forrest : Following up on Susan's question about lack of travel restrictions, to confirm, is it the case that there is nothing to stop a participant attending the meeting from a highly affected region (ie, Wuhan)? 12:41:37 From Susan Payne SCA : so you are saying community members from china and HK cannot attend the meeting. or is that just ICANN staff? 12:41:41 From Chris Disspain : Or have I misunderstood 12:42:02 From Donna Austin, Neustar : What's ICANN's policy for funded travellers? Does ICANN have a policy that would restrict travel from funded travellers from affected countries or regions? 12:44:26 From Susan Payne SCA : thank you for the clarification Goran - I think this may impact the views of some in our constituency, who had assumed there were such resrictions 12:44:53 From Keith Drazek (Verisign) : And it's not just the ICANN travelers, there will be others arriving into Cancun for spring break, etc. 12:46:53 From Dean Marks : Thanks for putting this call together. Much appreciated 12:48:57 From sergio salinas porto LACRALO : hi everyone! 12:48:58 From Bruna Santos : thank you very much for facilitating this call! 12:49:25 From Goran Marby : Thanks for your time! 12:49:44 From Robin Gross : Thanks for organizing this call. Appreciate the community engagement on this issue. 12:50:15 From Susan Payne SCA : thank you very much for this call 12:50:16 From Donna Austin, Neustar : Very heartening to hear from Maarten and Goran that the human element is an important if not primary consideration. 12:50:31 From Heather Forrest : Thank you for organising the call. 12:50:40 From Ria Otanes : Thank you all for joining. Have a great day. 12:50:41 From Keith Drazek (Verisign) : Thanks for this outreach. Over-communication is welcome in these circumstances. 12:50:47 From Katrina Sataki (ccNSO) : thank you, bye! See you in Cancun 12:50:51 From Manal Ismail : Thanks everyone ..

3 2