November 2010 - council - lists.icann.org

FW: Polling Council members- Cartagena GNSO dinner change from Saturday to Sunday night
by Adrian Kinderis 18 Nov '10

18 Nov '10

Resending. Adrian Kinderis Chief Executive Officer AusRegistry International Pty Ltd Level 8, 10 Queens Road Melbourne. Victoria Australia. 3004 Ph: +61 3 9866 3710 Fax: +61 3 9866 1970 Email: adrian(a)ausregistry.com Web: www.ausregistry.com - Follow AusRegistry International on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ausregistryint The information contained in this communication is intended for the named recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally privileged and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this communication in error, please delete all copies from your system and notify us immediately. -----Original Message----- From: Adrian Kinderis Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 10:15 PM To: 'Glen de Saint Géry'; Gomes, Chuck; Edmon Chung; Caroline Greer; Stéphane Van Gelder; Tim Ruiz; Andrei Kolesnikov; Terry L Davis, P.E.; icann(a)rodenbaugh.com; zahid(a)dndrc.com; krosette(a)cov.com ; Taylor, David; 'Jaime Wagner - PowerSelf'; KnobenW(a)telekom.de; Mary Wong; William Drake; wendy(a)seltzer.com; Rafik Dammak; Rosemary Sinclair; HughesDeb(a)usa.redcross.org; Alan Greenberg; Han Chuan, Lee; Olga Cavalli Cc: gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: Polling Council members- Cartagena GNSO dinner change from Saturday to Sunday night It is sometimes more helpful to have had two days worth of discussion prior to the Board meeting. I am happy with the Sunday. Is there a reason for the change? Adrian Kinderis -----Original Message----- From: Glen de Saint Géry [mailto:Glen@icann.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 3:29 AM To: Gomes, Chuck; Edmon Chung; Caroline Greer; Stéphane Van Gelder; Tim Ruiz; Adrian Kinderis; Andrei Kolesnikov; Terry L Davis, P.E.; icann(a)rodenbaugh.com; zahid(a)dndrc.com; krosette(a)cov.com ; Taylor, David; 'Jaime Wagner - PowerSelf'; KnobenW(a)telekom.de; Mary Wong; William Drake; wendy(a)seltzer.com; Rafik Dammak; Rosemary Sinclair; HughesDeb(a)usa.redcross.org; Alan Greenberg; Han Chuan, Lee; Olga Cavalli Cc: gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org Subject: Polling Council members- Cartagena GNSO dinner change from Saturday to Sunday night Dear Council Member, We have been notified that the ICANN Board would like to change the social event - the dinner - with the GNSO from Sunday to Saturday, 4 December. We would be grateful if you would let us know whether this will work for you. Would you please be so kind as to respond to <gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org> no later than Thursday, 11 November if this change would impact you. If this happens, the Council dinner on Saturday night, 4 December will be rescheduled to Sunday night, 5 December 2010. Thank you very much. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

2 1

FW: Replacement for Ken Silva on the AoC SSR RT
by Gomes, Chuck 18 Nov '10

18 Nov '10

Here's the message I just sent to the Selectors on the AoC SSR RT regarding a replacement for Ken Silva. Chuck _____________________________________________ From: Gomes, Chuck Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 9:50 AM To: Rod Beckstrom; Heather.Dryden(a)ic.gc.ca; 'Olof Nordling' Subject: Replacement for Ken Silva on the AoC SSR RT Rod/Heather, As I think you know, the GNSO endorsement process for AoC RTs asks each of the SGs to endorse one candidate per RT. In the case of the SSR RT, Ken Silva was endorsed by the RySG. After Ken's resignation, two candidates were nominated in the RySG to replace him. Because no process was in place to choose between the two candidates and to be responsive to fill the vacancy as quickly as possible, the RySG decided that it would save several weeks if both names were submitted. The GNSO is hereby forwarding the two candidates that were endorsed by the RySG for your consideration and selection between the two, who we believe are both very qualified: I believe that both of them already submitted the necessary documents to the RT but links to them are provided here as well:. o Rodney Joffe http://gnso.icann.org/aoc-reviews/application-joffe-cv-14jul10-en.pdf http://gnso.icann.org/aoc-reviews/application-joffe-motivation-letter-14 jul10-en.pdf http://gnso.icann.org/aoc-reviews/application-joffe-additional-ccnso-req uirements-14jul10-en.pdf o Ramses Martinez http://gnso.icann.org/aoc-reviews/application-martinez-bio-04nov10-en.pd f http://gnso.icann.org/aoc-reviews/application-martinez-cv-04nov10-en.pdf http://gnso.icann.org/aoc-reviews/application-martinez-soi-11nov10-en.pd f Please let us know if you have any questions. Chuck Gomes, GNSO Council Chair

1 0

JAS WG charter extension motion
by Rafik Dammak 18 Nov '10

18 Nov '10

Hello, I want to submit this motion for JAS WG charter extension in response to ICANN board resolution about supporting applicants and for completion a list of further work items. Regards Rafik

10 19

GCOT Motion
by Zahid Jamil 18 Nov '10

18 Nov '10

Would it be efficient to wait for the OSC to work on/ the revision of Chapter 5.0 and DoI to see what the OSC's final input regarding them might be? It seems that a complete rejection of reworking the DoI is not what everyone wishes but particular language is the issue. Sincerely, Zahid Jamil Barrister-at-law Jamil & Jamil Barristers-at-law 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan Cell: +923008238230 Tel: +92 21 35680760 / 35685276 / 35655025 Fax: +92 21 35655026 <http://www.jamilandjamil.com/> www.jamilandjamil.com Notice / Disclaimer This message contains confidential information and its contents are being communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the intellectual property of DNDRC, and constitute privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of DNDRC is prohibited.

1 0

FW: Polling Council members- Cartagena GNSO dinner change from Saturday to Sunday night
by Adrian Kinderis 18 Nov '10

18 Nov '10

Resending Adrian Kinderis Chief Executive Officer AusRegistry International Pty Ltd Level 8, 10 Queens Road Melbourne. Victoria Australia. 3004 Ph: +61 3 9866 3710 Fax: +61 3 9866 1970 Email: adrian(a)ausregistry.com Web: www.ausregistry.com - Follow AusRegistry International on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ausregistryint The information contained in this communication is intended for the named recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally privileged and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this communication in error, please delete all copies from your system and notify us immediately. -----Original Message----- From: Adrian Kinderis Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 12:49 PM To: 'Gomes, Chuck'; Glen de Saint Géry; edmon(a)registry.asia; Caroline Greer; Stéphane Van Gelder; Tim Ruiz; andrei(a)cctld.ru; Terry L Davis, P.E.; icann(a)rodenbaugh.com; zahid(a)dndrc.com; krosette(a)cov.com; Taylor, David; Jaime Wagner - PowerSelf; KnobenW(a)telekom.de; Mary Wong; William Drake; wendy(a)seltzer.com; rafik.dammak(a)gmail.com; Rosemary Sinclair; HughesDeb(a)usa.redcross.org; Alan Greenberg; Han Chuan, Lee; Olga Cavalli Cc: gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: Polling Council members- Cartagena GNSO dinner change from Saturday to Sunday night I have plans for the Saturday evening. Adrian Kinderis -----Original Message----- From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@verisign.com] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 10:00 AM To: Adrian Kinderis; Glen de Saint Géry; edmon(a)registry.asia; Caroline Greer; Stéphane Van Gelder; Tim Ruiz; andrei(a)cctld.ru; Terry L Davis, P.E.; icann(a)rodenbaugh.com; zahid(a)dndrc.com; krosette(a)cov.com; Taylor, David; Jaime Wagner - PowerSelf; KnobenW(a)telekom.de; Mary Wong; William Drake; wendy(a)seltzer.com; rafik.dammak(a)gmail.com; Rosemary Sinclair; HughesDeb(a)usa.redcross.org; Alan Greenberg; Han Chuan, Lee; Olga Cavalli Cc: gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org Subject: RE: Polling Council members- Cartagena GNSO dinner change from Saturday to Sunday night Diane provided the following response to Adrian's question: "With regards to Sunday, the local hosts have extended an invitation to a number of people for a small event that they were not able to have on any other evening. That is why I've asked if its possible to shift this dinner here in Cartagena. Regards Diane" What she didn't say in her response is that she first tried to change the date of the event and was unsuccessful. Chuck > -----Original Message----- > From: Adrian Kinderis [mailto:adrian@ausregistry.com.au] > Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 6:15 AM > To: Glen de Saint Géry; Gomes, Chuck; edmon(a)registry.asia; Caroline > Greer; Stéphane Van Gelder; Tim Ruiz; andrei(a)cctld.ru; Terry L Davis, > P.E.; icann(a)rodenbaugh.com; zahid(a)dndrc.com; krosette(a)cov.com ; Taylor, > David; 'Jaime Wagner - PowerSelf'; KnobenW(a)telekom.de; Mary Wong; > William Drake; wendy(a)seltzer.com; rafik.dammak(a)gmail.com; Rosemary > Sinclair; HughesDeb(a)usa.redcross.org; Alan Greenberg; Han Chuan, Lee; > Olga Cavalli > Cc: gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org > Subject: RE: Polling Council members- Cartagena GNSO dinner change from > Saturday to Sunday night > > It is sometimes more helpful to have had two days worth of discussion > prior to the Board meeting. I am happy with the Sunday. > > Is there a reason for the change? > > Adrian Kinderis > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Glen de Saint Géry [mailto:Glen@icann.org] > Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 3:29 AM > To: Gomes, Chuck; Edmon Chung; Caroline Greer; Stéphane Van Gelder; Tim > Ruiz; Adrian Kinderis; Andrei Kolesnikov; Terry L Davis, P.E.; > icann(a)rodenbaugh.com; zahid(a)dndrc.com; krosette(a)cov.com ; Taylor, > David; 'Jaime Wagner - PowerSelf'; KnobenW(a)telekom.de; Mary Wong; > William Drake; wendy(a)seltzer.com; Rafik Dammak; Rosemary Sinclair; > HughesDeb(a)usa.redcross.org; Alan Greenberg; Han Chuan, Lee; Olga > Cavalli > Cc: gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org > Subject: Polling Council members- Cartagena GNSO dinner change from > Saturday to Sunday night > > Dear Council Member, > > We have been notified that the ICANN Board would like to change the > social event - the dinner - with the GNSO from Sunday to Saturday, 4 > December. We would be grateful if you would let us know whether this > will work for you. > Would you please be so kind as to respond to > <gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org> no later than Thursday, 11 November > if this change would impact you. If this happens, the Council dinner on > Saturday night, 4 December will be rescheduled to Sunday night, 5 > December 2010. > > Thank you very much. > Kind regards, > > Glen > > Glen de Saint Géry > GNSO Secretariat > gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org > http://gnso.icann.org >

1 0

Re: [council] RE: Adding incoming Councilors to the Council list
by Caroline Greer 18 Nov '10

18 Nov '10

I think we should accept this proposal and move on. Although incoming Councillors, and indeed everyone, can read the public transcripts, it is more convenient to have the posts coming directly to your mailbox to be managed in a manner of your choosing. Seems like a no-brainer particularly when there is a precedent for doing so. Thanks. ---------------- Caroline Greer Director of Policy dotMobi ----- Original Message ----- From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org <owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org> To: Council GNSO <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Sent: Wed Nov 17 09:06:40 2010 Subject: Re: [council] RE: Adding incoming Councilors to the Council list Chuck, Olga and I had discussed this in our Council leaders meeting before Chuck submitted the question to the Council list. We all agreed that having new Councillors on the list as observers (i.e. without posting permission as Rafik recalls from last year) is a nice way to transition them into the Council. Plus, as they're observers, there's no harm done. It's a small point and I don't think we should be spending much time on it, but it does seem like a nice way of welcoming people to the Council. Stéphane Le 17 nov. 2010 à 04:05, Rafik Dammak a écrit : > @Chuck last year, new councillors was added without being granted posting permissions and it helped a lot , I don't see any reason preventing the addition of new councillors to the list this year.

3 4

Agenda for GNSO Council Meeting 18 November 2010 at 11:00 UTC
by Glen de Saint Géry 18 Nov '10

18 Nov '10

Agenda for GNSO Council Meeting 18 November 2010. https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?proposed_agenda_18_november_2010 http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-council-18nov10-en.htm This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures approved 5 August 2010 for the GNSO Council. http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-op-procedures-05aug10-en.pdf For convenience: * An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is provided in Appendix 1 at the end of this agenda. * An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the absentee voting procedures is provided in Appendix 2 at the end of this agenda. Meeting Time 11:00 UTC Coordinated Universal Time:11:00 UTC - see below for local times (03:00 Los Angeles, 06:00 Washington DC, 11:00 London, 12:00 Brussels, 22:00 Melbourne ) Dial-in numbers will be sent individually to Council members. Councilors should notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if a dial out call is needed. GNSO Council meeting audiocast http://stream.icann.org:8000/gnso.m3u Item 1: Administrative matters (10 minutes) 1.1 Roll call of Council members and polling for Disclosures of Interest * Per the GNSO Operating Procedures, Section 5.4, we are required to poll Councilors regarding "any direct or indirect interests that may affect a Relevant Party's judgment on an issue that is under review, consideration, or discussion" in this meeting. Here is the definition provided in the procedures: "Disclosure of Interest: Relevant to a specific issue at a specific time. A written statement made by a Relevant Party of direct and indirect interests that may be commercial (e.g. monetary payment) or non-commercial (e.g. non-tangible benefit such as publicity, political or academic visibility) and may affect, or be perceived to affect, the Relevant Party's judgment on a specific issue." The main issues for this meeting are * GNSO Project Decision Making * Status of Council Chair Nominations and NCA Assignments * Disclosure of Interest Procedures motion * Final Report on Proposals for Improvements to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement * New gTLD Applicant Guidebook * RySG endorsements for AoC SSR RT replacement 1.2 Update any statements of interest 1.3 Review/amend agenda 1.4. Note the status of minutes for the previous Council meeting per the GNSO Operating Procedures: * 28 October 2010 meeting minutes<http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg09873.html> http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg09873.html - Scheduled for approval on 15 November 2010. Item 2: Election of Council Chair & Vice Chairs (20 minutes) Refer to procedures approved on 28 October: http://gnso.icann.org/elections/election-procedures-2010.htm 2.1 Chair Nominees * Non-contracted Party House: Olga Cavalli Candidate Statement <http://gnso.icann.org/elections/cavalli-statement-11nov10-en.htm> * Contracted Party House: Stéphane van Gelder Candidate Statement <http://gnso.icann.org/elections/van-gelder-statement-12nov10-en.htm> * Questions for Olga? * Questions for Stéphane? 2.2 NCA Assignments? * Non-contracted Party House: (TBD) * Contracted Party House: (TBD) 2.3 Status of OSC/GCOT review of the election process (Julie Hedlund) Item 3: GNSO Project Prioritisation (10 minutes) 3.1 Considering the prioritization discussions we had on 28 October and prior to that, is the following a possible way forward: Rather than spending more time prioritizing GNSO projects, develop criteria for making decisions on a case by case basis? * Discussion * Other alternatives? * Volunteers? 3.2 Next steps? Item 4: Disclosure of Interest Procedures (10 minutes) 4.1 Refer to revised procedures: http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/gnso-operating-procedures-revisions-15oct10-en… 4.2 Refer to motion: https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?18_november_motions 4.3 Discussion 4.4 Vote (Note that absentee voting is not allowed for this motion.) Item 5: Final Report on Proposals for Improvements to the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (20 minutes) 5.1 Refer to final report: http://gnso.icann.org/issues/raa/raa-improvements-proposal-final-report-18o… 5.2 Overview of report (Margie Milam) http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/final-report-raa-improvements-28oct10-… 5.3 Discussion 5.4 Next steps? Item 6: Planning for Cartagena Meetings (15 minutes) 6.1 Changes to schedule (Stéphane Van Gelder, Glen de Saint Géry) http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/gnso-draft-agenda-cartagena-26oct10-en.pdf 6.2 Topic(s) for Joint meetings with the GAC & ccNSO * Refer to discussion paper titled " Proposed discussion of Cross-SO/AC policy development work ": http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-cross-so-ac-policy-discussion-28oct10-en… * Overview of paper (Liz Gasster) * Status of topic for GAC & ccNSO joint meetings (Chuck Gomes) * Discussion? 6.3 Other agendas Item 7: New gTLD Applicant Guidebook (30 minutes) 7.1 Joint Applicant Support WG (Rafik Dammak) * Refer to JAS WG recommendations: http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-11nov10-en.htm * Brief overview of recommendations (Rafik Dammak) * Refer to Motion to Extend the WG: https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?18_november_motions * Discussion Vote (Note that absentee voting does not apply) 7.2 VI PDP WG Interim Report * Refer to Report: http://gnso.icann.org/issues/vertical-integration/vi-interim-report-phase-i… * Brief overview of report ( Margie Milam) * Refer to motion: https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?18_november_motions * Discussion * Exception to Eight day requirement * Vote (Note that absentee voting is not allowed for this motion.) 7.3 Refer to latest version of the guidebook: http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/draft-rfp-clean-12nov10-en.pdf 7.4 Highlights (Kurt Pritz) 7.5 Discussion 7.6 Action Items? Item 8: Other Business (5 Minutes) 8.1 AoC SSR RT Resignation by Ken Silva * The RySG endorsed two candidates to replace Ken: http://gnso.icann.org/aoc-reviews/dns-ssr-en.htm * Rodney Joffe http://gnso.icann.org/aoc-reviews/application-joffe-cv-14jul10-en.pdf http://gnso.icann.org/aoc-reviews/application-joffe-motivation-letter-14jul… http://gnso.icann.org/aoc-reviews/application-joffe-additional-ccnso-requir… * Ramses Martinez http://gnso.icann.org/aoc-reviews/application-martinez-bio-04nov10-en.pdf http://gnso.icann.org/aoc-reviews/application-martinez-cv-04nov10-en.pdf http://gnso.icann.org/aoc-reviews/application-martinez-soi-11nov10-en.pdf * Discussion * Note that the GNSO procedures do not require approval by the Council. * Any objections to sending the two candidates names to the Selectors? 8.2 Personnel announcement Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X, Section 3) 9. Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, Annex A hereto, or the GNSO Operating Procedures, the default threshold to pass a GNSO Council motion or other voting action requires a simple majority vote of each House. The voting thresholds described below shall apply to the following GNSO actions: 1. Create an Issues Report: requires an affirmative vote of more than 25% vote of each House or majority of one House; 2. Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as described in Annex A): requires an affirmative vote of more than 33% of each House or more than 66% of one House; 3. Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of more than 75% of one House and a majority of the other House ("GNSO Supermajority"); 4. Approve a PDP Recommendation Without a GNSO Supermajority: requires an affirmative vote of a majority of each House and further requires that one GNSO Council member representative of at least 3 of the 4 Stakeholder Groups supports the Recommendation; 5. Approve a PDP Recommendation With a GNSO Supermajority: requires an affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority; and 6. Approve a PDP Recommendation Imposing New Obligations on Certain Contracting Parties: where an ICANN contract provision specifies that "a two-thirds vote of the council" demonstrates the presence of a consensus, the GNSO Supermajority vote threshold will have to be met or exceeded with respect to any contracting party affected by such contract provision. Appendix 2: Absentee Voting Procedures (Council Operating Procedures 4.4) Members that are absent from a meeting at the time of a vote on the following items may vote by absentee ballot: 1. Initiate a policy development process; 2. Forward a policy recommendation to the Board; 3. Recommend amendments to the ICANN Bylaws; 4. Fill a position open for election. The GNSO Secretariat will provide reasonable means for transmitting and authenticating absentee ballots, which could include voting by telephone, e- mail, or web-based interface. Absentee ballots must be submitted within 72 hours following the start of the meeting in which a vote is initiated, except that, in exceptional circumstances announced at the time of the vote, the Chair may reduce this time to 24 hours or extend the time to 7 days. There must be a quorum for the meeting in which the vote is initiated. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Local time between October and March, Winter in the NORTHERN hemisphere ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 11:00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- California, USA (PDT) UTC-8+0DST 03:00 New York/Washington DC, USA (EDT) UTC-5+0DST 06:00 Buenos Aires, Argentina UTC-3+0DST 08:00 Rio de Janeiro/Sao Paulo Brazil UTC-2+1DST 09:00 London, United Kingdom (BST) UTC+0DST 11:00 Darmstadt, Germany (CET) UTC+1+0DST 12:00 Paris, France (CET) UTC+1+0DST 12:00 Barcelona, Spain (CET) UTC+1+0DST 12:00 Karachi, Pakistan UTC+5+0DST 16:00 Hong Kong, China UTC+8+0DST 19:00 Tokyo, Japan UTC+9+0DST 20:00 Melbourne,/Sydney Australia (EDT) UTC+10+1DST 22:00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The DST starts/ends on last Sunday of March 2011, 2:00 or 3:00 local time (with exceptions) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

8 8

Re: RES: [gnso-osc] Re: [council] MOTION REFERRING TO THE GNSO COUNCIL OPERATIONS PROCEDURES WORK TEAM (GCOT) RECOMMENDATIONS
by Julie Hedlund 17 Nov '10

17 Nov '10

Thanks Vanda. Wolf-Ulrich was kind enough to identify them and remove them. It is his corrected version that is posted at: http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/gnso-operating-procedures-revisions-15oct10-en…. Warm regards, Julie On 11/17/10 4:20 PM, "Vanda UOL" <vanda(a)uol.com.br> wrote: Thanks Julie, makes sense to remove the references. Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados IT Trend Alameda Santos 1470 – 1407,8 01418-903 São Paulo,SP, Brasil Tel + 5511 3266.6253 Mob + 55118181.1464 De: owner-gnso-osc(a)icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-osc@icann.org] Em nome de Julie Hedlund Enviada em: terça-feira, 16 de novembro de 2010 11:57 Para: Tim Ruiz; stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com; Wolf-Ulrich Knoben Cc: philip.sheppard(a)aim.be; Ray Fassett; gnso-osc-ops; gnso-osc(a)icann.org; council(a)gnso.icann.org Assunto: [gnso-osc] Re: [council] MOTION REFERRING TO THE GNSO COUNCIL OPERATIONS PROCEDURES WORK TEAM (GCOT) RECOMMENDATIONS Dear Stephane, Tim, and Wolf-Ulrich, I see that there were indeed a couple of references remaining. This was an error in my drafting of the revised version without the DOI section. I removed the relevant sections and definition, but missed a couple of references that were embedded in the text. I should have caught these and I am grateful that Wolf-Ulrich has found them and deleted them. I will ask Glen to post the corrected version. Thank you. Best regards, Julie On 11/16/10 8:39 AM, "Tim Ruiz" <tim(a)godaddy.com> wrote: What am I missing? I don't see any difference in the two versions? Tim > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [council] MOTION REFERRING TO THE GNSO COUNCIL OPERATIONS > PROCEDURES WORK TEAM (GCOT) RECOMMENDATIONS > From: StÃ©phane Van Gelder > Date: Tue, November 16, 2010 6:04 am > To: "" > Cc: , , > , , > > > Good catch Wolf. > > I see no problem in accepting the amendment as friendly. > > I am more perplexed at the references to the DOI that were still in the document you edited. > > Ray, Philip, could you please enlighten us as to whether those were just overlooked or whether the GCOT and the OSC planned to leave them in there? > > As a reminder, the aim of my motion is to completely remove the DOI obligations from the Op Procs as discussed. > > Stéphane > > Le 16 nov. 2010 à 11:39, a écrit : > > > Colleagues, > > The first "Resolved" of the a.m. motion (see https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?18_november_motions) reads: > > RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council accepts these deliverables submitted by the GCOT and approved by the OSC and directs Staff to post the aforementioned document for thirty (30) days in the ICANN Public Comment Forum. > I wonder whether the GCOT has submitted and the OSC has approved the proposed revisions to section 5.0 in the version presented. To my knowledge the OSC approval was given including the DOI. In this case I'd like to suggest a friendly amendment as follows: > RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council accepts these deliverables submitted by the GCOT and approved by the OSC and directs Staff to post the aforementioned document for thirty (30) days in the ICANN Public Comment Forum > Philp's and Ray's advise would be helpful. > > There are still references to DOI left in the revision which I've removed (see attached). > > > > Wolf-Ulrich Knoben > > > > > > > >

1 0

Draft Schedule for GNSO Related Meetings in Cartagena
by Glen de Saint Géry 17 Nov '10

17 Nov '10

Dear Councillors, Attached please find the draft schedule for the GNSO related meetings during the ICANN meetings in Cartagena. This schedule should be read in conjunction with the main schedule http://cartagena39.icann.org/full-schedule Please feel free to share your comments, suggestions. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

RE: [council] MOTION REFERRING TO THE GNSO COUNCIL OPERATIONS PROCEDURES WORK TEAM (GCOT) RECOMMENDATIONS
by Tim Ruiz 17 Nov '10

17 Nov '10

What am I missing? I don't see any difference in the two versions? Tim > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [council] MOTION REFERRING TO THE GNSO COUNCIL OPERATIONS > PROCEDURES WORK TEAM (GCOT) RECOMMENDATIONS > From: StÃ©phane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com> > Date: Tue, November 16, 2010 6:04 am > To: "<KnobenW(a)telekom.de>" <KnobenW(a)telekom.de> > Cc: <philip.sheppard(a)aim.be>, <ray(a)goto.jobs>, > <gnso-osc-ops(a)icann.org>, <gnso-osc(a)icann.org>, > <council(a)gnso.icann.org> > > Good catch Wolf. > > I see no problem in accepting the amendment as friendly. > > I am more perplexed at the references to the DOI that were still in the document you edited. > > Ray, Philip, could you please enlighten us as to whether those were just overlooked or whether the GCOT and the OSC planned to leave them in there? > > As a reminder, the aim of my motion is to completely remove the DOI obligations from the Op Procs as discussed. > > Stéphane > > Le 16 nov. 2010 à 11:39, a écrit : > > > Colleagues, > > The first "Resolved" of the a.m. motion (see https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?18_november_motions) reads: > > RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council accepts these deliverables submitted by the GCOT and approved by the OSC and directs Staff to post the aforementioned document for thirty (30) days in the ICANN Public Comment Forum. > I wonder whether the GCOT has submitted and the OSC has approved the proposed revisions to section 5.0 in the version presented. To my knowledge the OSC approval was given including the DOI. In this case I'd like to suggest a friendly amendment as follows: > RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council accepts these deliverables submitted by the GCOT and approved by the OSC and directs Staff to post the aforementioned document for thirty (30) days in the ICANN Public Comment Forum > Philp's and Ray's advise would be helpful. > > There are still references to DOI left in the revision which I've removed (see attached). > > > > Wolf-Ulrich Knoben > > > > > > > >

4 6