August 2010 - council - lists.icann.org

MP3 recording GNSO Council teleconference, Thursday, 5 August 2010
by Glen de Saint Géry 06 Aug '10

06 Aug '10

Please find the MP3 recording of the GNSO Council teleconference, held on Thursday, 5 August, 2010 at: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-council-20100805.mp3 on page http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#aug Happy Listening! Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

2 1

GNSO Council resolutions 5 August 2010
by Glen de Saint Géry 05 Aug '10

05 Aug '10

Dear All, Ahead of the official Council minutes, the following motion was unanimously passed by the Council today. A Resolution to approve the GNSO Council Operations Work Team (GCOT) and the Constituency and Stakeholder Group Operations Work Team (CSG-WT) Deliverables (29 July 2010) WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 23 June 2010 meeting in Brussels, accepted a set of deliverables submitted by the GNSO Council Operations Work Team (GCOT) https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?gnso_operations_team and the Constituency and Stakeholder Group Operations Work Team (CSG-WT) https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team ; WHEREAS, a twenty-one (21) day Public Comment Forum http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#gcot-csg-recommendations completed between 28 June 2010 and 18 July 2010 and a Staff Summary and Analysis http://forum.icann.org/lists/gcot-csg-recommendations/msg00001.html has been published; WHEREAS, the GNSO Council agreed to take action on the these deliverables as soon as possible after the end of the public comment period; and WHEREAS, there were no public comments submitted that would amend any of the GCOT or CSG-WT recommendations. NOW, BE IT THEREFORE: RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves the following set of five GCOT deliverables, without further modification: o Section 2.1-Council Member Term Limits http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-term-limits-24may10-e… o Section 2.4-Board Seat Elections http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-board-seat-elections-… o Section 3.8-Absences and Vacancies http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-absences-vacancies-11… o Chapter 4.0-Voting http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-voting-11jun10-en.pdf o Chapter 5.0-Statements and Disclosures of Interest http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-gnso-op-procedures-soi-doi-11jun10-en.pdf Note that two sections, 5.3.2 and 5.3.3, are not approved pending further Staff action to be determined. These sections are footnoted in the document as "inactive" until subsequently approved by the OSC and Council. RESOLVED FURTHER, that Staff has incorporated the above Sections and Chapters into a new version of the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) < http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-op-procedures-draft-05aug10-en.pdf>, which becomes effective immediately upon adoption; RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council approves the following CSG-WT deliverable http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-csg-recommendations-task-27may10-en.pdf, which is organized into two sections as follows: o Sections 2.1 & 2.2: Recommended Common Operating Principles and Participation Guidelines for GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies, which Staff has incorporated into a new Chapter 7.0 in the above-referenced GNSO Operating Procedures; and o Section 2.3: Recommendations on a GNSO Database of Community Members. RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council directs Staff to provide Sections 2.1 and 2.2 above to GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies for use in amending their charters, as appropriate; RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council hereby expresses its gratitude and appreciation to the GCOT and CSG Work Teams for their dedication, commitment, and thoughtful recommendations. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

AOB: Schedule of Meetings in November and December
by Rosette, Kristina 05 Aug '10

05 Aug '10

All, I'd like to add as AOB a request that we set soon our schedule for meetings in November and December. (If we have and I don't have it, would someone please send it? And, in that case, ignore the rest of this message.) The GNSO Master Calendar lists our last meeting as October 28. Given that we all have hectic schedules, I think it would be helpful to have those meetings set as soon as possible. K

2 2

Item 4: September meeting date September 16 (scheduled date) vs. September 8?
by Glen de Saint Géry 05 Aug '10

05 Aug '10

Dear Councillors, In preparation for the Council meeting today, attached please find a table that summarizes the results of the 2 doodle polls in: Item 4: September meeting date September 16 (scheduled date) vs. September 8? (10 Minutes) Refer to Doodle Poll results: 8 September 11:00UTC and 15:00UTC http://www.doodle.com/k8ci6c69e8zb9ywq 16 September 11:00UTC http://www.doodle.com/zvvzwfkd9xdp4wge The doodle poll results indicate that the preferred day and time for a meeting is Wednesday, 8 September at 15:00 UTC. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

FW: Status on JAS: Support for new gTLD applicants
by Glen de Saint Géry 04 Aug '10

04 Aug '10

-----Original Message----- Forwarded From: Avri Doria JAS co-chair Glen - With any changes that my co-chair or the liaisons or KArlamay make, this is my update for the council on JAS. Thanks ----------- The english language comment period ended on 31 July and the working group has started to review the comments while waiting for the responsible staff to summarize those comments. The non-english comment period is not scheduled to end until the end of August. The group has also begun work on the final report which will be based on responding to the issues that were brought up in the session held in Brussels, the english language comments, and eventually the non-english language comments when they become available. At this point, due to the work to be done and the fact that all comments will not be received before the end of august, the group will not meet is August 15 deadline for the final report. Our new target for the final report is 3 September - the deadline for documents to be available for the Board retreat on the new GTLD program. We hope the GNSO will endorse this change of milestone date.

1 0

FW: SSR & WHOIS AoC Reviews - Applications - GNSO Endorsement
by Gomes, Chuck 04 Aug '10

04 Aug '10

Please note the AoC RT endorsement information received from the RySG today. An alternative endorsement for the SSR RT is still possible but the RySG did not feel it had enough information to make that decision today. Chuck From: David W. Maher [mailto:dmaher@pir.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 12:21 PM To: Gomes, Chuck Cc: Cherstubbs(a)AOL.COM Subject: SSR & WHOIS AoC Reviews - Applications - GNSO Endorsement Dear Chuck: This message is the confirmation to the GNSO Council, and to you as Chair, of the action taken by unanimous vote of the Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG) at its meeting on 4 August 2010. The RySG endorsed the following applications for membership in these Affirmation of Commitments review teams: Security, Stability and Resiliency: Primary Endorsement for Ken Silva. WHOIS: Primary Endorsement for Kathy Kleiman Alternate Endorsement for Kim Von Arx. Respectfully submitted. David David W. Maher Chair, Registries Stakeholder Group Senior Vice President - Law & Policy .ORG, The Public Interest Registry 1775 Wiehle Ave, #200 Reston, VA 20190 USA (v) +1-312-876-8055 (f) +1-312-876-7934

1 0

Amendment to Motion to Pursue Whois Study # 1
by Gomes, Chuck 04 Aug '10

04 Aug '10

On behalf of the RySG, I would like to propose an amended version of the motion to proceed with Whois Study # 1 on misuse. The proposed changes are highlighted in the attached file. <<Motion Amendment for GNSO Council WHOIS Study 1 - 4 Aug 2010.docx>> In my role as chair, I would like to ask Mike Rodenbaugh, who made the original motion, and Terry Davis, who seconded the motion, if they would consider the amendments friendly. Chuck

3 2

RE: [council] Amendment to Motion to Pursue Whois Study # 1
by Gomes, Chuck 04 Aug '10

04 Aug '10

Yes Mike. I did see that from Terry so we will consider the amendments as friendly. Thanks for the quick response. Chuck From: Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:mike@rodenbaugh.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 11:37 AM To: Gomes, Chuck; 'Council GNSO' Subject: RE: [council] Amendment to Motion to Pursue Whois Study # 1 Thanks Chuck, yes I consider the amended motion as friendly. I believe Terry has privately seconded that notion to you and I as well, but may be traveling and unavailable for our call tomorrow. Mike Rodenbaugh RODENBAUGH LAW tel/fax: +1 (415) 738-8087 http://rodenbaugh.com <http://rodenbaugh.com/> From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 8:20 AM To: Council GNSO Subject: [council] Amendment to Motion to Pursue Whois Study # 1 Importance: High On behalf of the RySG, I would like to propose an amended version of the motion to proceed with Whois Study # 1 on misuse. The proposed changes are highlighted in the attached file. <<Motion Amendment for GNSO Council WHOIS Study 1 - 4 Aug 2010.docx>> In my role as chair, I would like to ask Mike Rodenbaugh, who made the original motion, and Terry Davis, who seconded the motion, if they would consider the amendments friendly. Chuck

1 0

Content removed at poster's request.
by None 02 Aug '10

02 Aug '10

Content removed at poster's request.

3 2

FW: Emailing: Jeff Brueggeman
by Glen de Saint Géry 02 Aug '10

02 Aug '10

-----Original Message----- Forwarded From: Alice Jansen [mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org] Dear Glen, Find attached Jeff Brueggeman's application for a position of volunteer Review Team Members on the Security, Stability and Resiliency of the DNS Review Team. Thank you, Best regards Alice The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: Jeff Brueggeman Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled.

1 0