October 2011 - council - lists.icann.org

RE: [council] Meeting with the Board - Qualities of a new CEO
by Andrei Kolesnikov Oct. 23, 2011

Oct. 23, 2011

In terms of priorities I would put it like this: 1. Experience with international relations, knowing different cultures, dealing with it, practice; 2. Means to support multistakeholder model: experience in balancing of the interests being a neutral; 3. Family/enterprise/corporate experience in managing funds and companies. CEO experience; 4. The last one charisma and leadership: work to do and balance is more important that running a roadshow. And my favorite one. I strongly believe that names of all candidates must be aired. I don't care if anyone will be hurt by not picking as CEO and consider this secrecy as an attempt to hide deals behind it. Running for a president and loose won't hurt anybody in America or elsewhere. --andrei From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 8:15 PM To: 'GNSO Council List' Subject: [council] Meeting with the Board - Qualities of a new CEO Importance: High All, PLEASE GIVE INPUT IN ORDER TO BEST INFORM TOMORROW'S DISCUSSION WITH THE BOARD Thanks, Jonathan ________________________ Hiring a new CEO What qualities do you think we ought to be seeking in a new CEO? Perhaps thinking about: . The nature of ICANN & the role it plays. Balancing technology sector, innovation, operational stability, financial management, being run in the public trust . Qualities of the previous incumbents and what you did or did not think were effective (for ICANN) about them? . The new/current world order (AOC, new gTLD programme, global economic environment, emergence of new technologies, enhanced interest of governments) . Desirable skills & experience - charisma, leadership, government relations, private sector, financial, operational, international experience What are your criteria for openness, transparency etc. in the hiring process? (bearing in mind considerations of responsibility to candidates and community, privacy, Board confidence) . Do we expect to see (and influence by e.g. public comment) the specification and key selection criteria? . Do we expect see and give feedback on the above or anything before the hiring process commences? . Do we expect to have any interaction during the course of the hiring process? Updates, information, influence? If so, how? . Do we expect to influence or comment on the final outcome? Anything else? . Any other comments or issues on the hiring of a new CEO? . Performance criteria and measures of a successful appointment? . Term & termination provisions?

2 1

RE: [council] Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice WG
by john＠crediblecontext.com Oct. 22, 2011

Oct. 22, 2011

It is I. Berard > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [council] Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice WG > From: StÃ©phane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com> > Date: Sat, October 22, 2011 10:50 am > To: "council(a)gnso.icann.org Council" <council(a)gnso.icann.org> > > Councillors, > > The CCTC has appointed Rosemary Sinclair as its Chair. Congratulations Rosemary and thanks for your willingness to do this. > > As Rosemary is stepping down from the Council on Wednesday, we have to consider the issue of Council Liaison to this group. I understand that there are volunteers willing to take this role on. If that is the case, could those people please make themselves known. > > Finally, please note that a workshop is scheduled on this topic on Thursday from 7 to 8:30 am. Please refer to our schedule if you would like to attend this. > > Also, the WG has requested that I advise the GAC of its charter. Please let me know if there is opposition to me doing that, as Chair. > > Thanks, > > Stéphane > > > > > > Début du message réexpédié : > De : Rosemary Sinclair <rosemary.sinclair(a)unsw.edu.au> > > Objet : Competition, Consumer Trust and Consumer Choice WG > > Date : 19 octobre 2011 01:46:25 HAEC > > À : Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com> > > Cc : Glen de Saint Géry <Glen(a)icann.org> > > Hi Stephane > > This email covers a few issues to do with the CCI WG: > > The Group has appointed me to the role of Chair (2.1.4.2 GNSO WG Guidelines) and I am happy to continue this work. This will need to be confirmed by GNSO Council. Could this be included in the update on the CCI WG for the next Council or do I need handle this another way? > > The Group has asked me to ask you about the GNSO Liaison role after I step down from Council. I am not sure how you wish to progress this but our group has had indications of people willing to undertake this role if that is helpful. > > > The WG also asks that you advise the GAC of our Charter. CcNSO liason has let ccNSO know of developments and ALAC will discuss the issues in Dakar. Even though we are not a cross-community WG we are keen to be as inclusive as possible. > > The WG has scheduled a workshop on 27 October from 7am to 8.30am. This is after GNSO Council public meeting so we will not be able to update GNSO Council with the latest progress but I will make our Workshop Discussion slide pack available by way of update for Council. > > If there is anything else I can let you know about please just advise me. > > Enjoy Dakar! > > Cheers for now > > Rosemary > > Rosemary SinclairDirector, External Relations > Australian School of Business > UNSW > +61 413734490(mobile) > > On 18/10/2011, at 5:28 AM, "Stéphane Van Gelder" <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com> wrote: > > > > Councillors, > > FYI, see below the message I have just sent Patrik Faltstrom, Chair of SSAC, following one of the RAP resolves the Council approved at its last teleconference. > > Thanks, > > Stéphane > > > > > > Début du message réexpédié : > De : Stéphane Van Gelder > > Objet : Cross TLD Registration Scam and Domain Kiting/Tasting > > Date : 17 octobre 2011 20:23:47 HAEC > > À : Patrik Fältström > > Hi Patrik, > > At its meeting on 6 October, in follow up to the recommendations of the Registration Abuse Policies Working Group, the GNSO Council tasked me as Chair, with regards to the recommendations on cross-TLD Registration Scam and Domain Kiting/Tasting, to communicate to the Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) the findings of the RAP WG in this regard and request that the SSAC consider evaluating and/or monitoring these abuses. If the SSAC elects to conduct this work, the GNSO Council requests that the SSAC inform the GNSO Council if it believes that further policy work by the GNSO Council should be undertaken to address these two types of abuse'. > > For your information, you will find attached to this message the findings of the RAP Working Group in relation to these issues. > > Please let me know if you have any questions. I look forward to discussing this with you in Dakar if required. > > > Best, > > > Stéphane > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

1 0

Meeting with Board - ethics policy question
by Rosette, Kristina Oct. 22, 2011

Oct. 22, 2011

All, All comments, suggestions, and revisions welcome! K -*- QUESTION FROM BOARD: As we work to develop ethics guidelines, what are your top 3 concerns and proposals to address them (within the confines of the multistakeholder, voluntary participation model)? PROPOSED RESPONSE: 1. Two threshold points. (1) As an initial matter, the relevance of "within the confines of the multistakeholder, voluntary participation model" is unclear. (2) In addition, ICANN has an opportunity to adopt a "gold standard" ethics policy. Whether we like it or not, the fact of the matter is that the absence of one provides a basis for challenging BoD decisions, the multi-stakeholder model and/or ICANN's viability to those who seek to do so. 2. The general view among GNSO Councilors is that the need for a stronger conflict of interest policy and an anti-revolving door policy is far greater at the level of ICANN Officers and Directors than it is at the level of GNSO volunteers. 3. Concern 1 is that the current conflicts of interest policy is too narrow. [Background: Not to be read at meeting, but just fyi: Article VI, Section 6 of the ICANN bylaws states that: The Board, through the Board Governance Committee, shall require a statement from each Director not less frequently than once a year setting forth all business and other affiliations that relate in any way to the business and other affiliations of ICANN. Each Director shall be responsible for disclosing to ICANN any matter that could reasonably be considered to make such Director an "interested director" within the meaning of Section 5233 of the California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law ("CNPBCL"). In addition, each Director shall disclose to ICANN any relationship or other factor that could reasonably be considered to cause the Director to be considered to be an "interested person" within the meaning of Section 5227 of the CNPBCL. The Board shall adopt policies specifically addressing Director, Officer, and Supporting Organization conflicts of interest. No Director shall vote on any matter in which he or she has a material and direct financial interest that would be affected by the outcome of the vote. Section 5233 is limited to self-dealing transactions, which are defined as "a transaction to which the corporation is a party and in which one or more of its directors has a material financial interest" and does not qualify for certain statutorily defined exemptions. http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/CORP/1/1/d2/2/2/3/s5233 Section 5227 defines interested persons as "either: (1)Any person currently being compensated by the corporation for services rendered to it within the previous 12 months, whether as a full- or part-time employee, independent contractor, or otherwise, excluding any reasonable compensation paid to a director as director; or (2)Any brother, sister, ancestor, descendant, spouse, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, mother-in-law, or father-in-law of any such person."] The current conflicts of interest policy does not impose an obligation on a Director to avoid conflicts that may not create a material financial interest but create an appearance of impropriety, would not be triggered by a close personal relationship that would not be encompassed by the statutorily defined relationships, and allows a Director to fully participate in discussions of votes on topics on which she/he would be otherwise prohibited from voting. A revised CoI policy should resolve these deficiencies. 4. Concern 2 is that there is no anti-revolving door policy. The absence of one can cast doubt on the integrity of decisions by the BoD and the resulting policy and implementation decisions. Similarly, the absence of an anti-revolving door policy allows a former Officer or Director to "cash in" on their experience as an Officer or Director in a way that creates an appearance of impropriety. A new anti-revolving door policy should address these deficiencies. 5. Concern 3 is a broader interest in considering possibly more robust ethics policies across the board -- for example, including a meaningful conflict of interest policy for employees, instituting penalties for a volunteer's failure to disclose material information in SOIs, and a GNSO equivalent of Article VI, Section 4 of the ICANN bylaws. We would welcome your feedback on these ideas as well as any others that you think should be included.

1 0

Re: [council] Re: formal position requirement
by carlos dionisio aguirre Oct. 22, 2011

Oct. 22, 2011

Stephane, With all my respect, the advice given by JJ is perfect, having in account the alternance of one and two NCAs each year. On the other hand, what happens when NomCom only appoint one NCA GNSO Council? Where this member will be assigned? Will be homeless during all period in GNSO? . Sorry but IMHO your reading is wrong. I think there are not any other possible interpretation, of course under my humble point of view. Regards Enviado desde mi dispositivo inalámbrico BlackBerry® -----Original Message----- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:22:23 To: <john.jeffrey(a)icann.org> Cc: <ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp>; <Samantha.Eisner(a)icann.org>; <robert.hoggarth(a)icann.org>; <liz.gasster(a)icann.org>; <daniel.halloran(a)icann.org>; <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Subject: [council] Re: formal position requirement Thanks JJ, I am copying the Council on my response. >From my reading of the bylaws, I see no mention of a requirement for rotation. So in theory, an NCA could be constantly given the same assignment by the NomCom. Is this read correct? If so, why are you suggesting rotation systems in your last paragraph? Adam, please let us know what the NomCom plans to do and when. I'm sure you understand that the GNSO is keen to get this matter resolved before we sit the new Council, on the Wednesday of the Dakar meeting. Stéphane Le 19 oct. 2011 à 19:43, John Jeffrey a écrit : Resending - may have been an error in transmission. Begin forwarded message: From: John Jeffrey < <mailto:john.jeffrey@icann.org> john.jeffrey(a)icann.org <mailto:john.jeffrey@icann.org> > Subject: Fwd: formal position requirement Date: October 19, 2011 9:19:12 AM PDT To: Stéphane Van Gelder < <mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com> stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com <mailto:stephane.vangelder@indom.com> >, Adam Peake < <mailto:ajp@glocom.ac.jp> ajp(a)glocom.ac.jp <mailto:ajp@glocom.ac.jp> > Cc: Samantha Eisner < <mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org> Samantha.Eisner(a)icann.org <mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org> >, Robert Hoggarth < <mailto:robert.hoggarth@icann.org> robert.hoggarth(a)icann.org <mailto:robert.hoggarth@icann.org> >, Liz Gasster < <mailto:liz.gasster@icann.org> liz.gasster(a)icann.org <mailto:liz.gasster@icann.org> >, Daniel Halloran < <mailto:daniel.halloran@icann.org> daniel.halloran(a)icann.org <mailto:daniel.halloran@icann.org> > Bcc: John Jeffrey < <mailto:john.jeffrey@icann.org> john.jeffrey(a)icann.org <mailto:john.jeffrey@icann.org> > Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE Dear Stephane and Adam, I write to you jointly as Chairs of the GNSO and the NomCom. I received the attached note from Carlos Dionisio Aguirre regarding the NomCom appointees to the GNSO and noted the need to provide advice on the ICANN Bylaws. Article X, Section 3.e requires the NomCom to appoint three members of the GNSO Council. Of those appointees, one shall be non-voting, and "one voting representative shall be assigned to each House . . . by the Nominating Committee." This Bylaws provision requires the NomCom to assign voting representatives among the GNSO's contracted and non-contracted party houses. Pursuant to the Bylaws, this assignment work should not be left to the GNSO. I appreciate that with the GNSO Restructuring, the initial assignment of the single NomCom Appointee (NCA) selected by the NomCom in 2010 did not pose a lot of complexity. However, now that the restructured form of the GNSO Council is in place and the NomCom is making appointments for multiple NCAs, it is important for the NomCom to complete the assignment process and identify the roles of the NCAs to the GNSO. If possible, I encourage the NomCom to complete this assignment process prior to the ICANN AGM in Dakar, Senegal and the seating of the new GNSO Council members (28 October 2011). Due to the NomCom's appointment rotation (2 NCAs to the GNSO in odd years, 1 NCA in even years), it may be beneficial for the NomCom and GNSO to consult together to determine if the GNSO would be better served by having both voting NCAs rotate at the same time, or if it is preferable to have 1 voting and 1 non-voting NCA rotate at the same time, with the term of the other voting NCA rotating in even years. Further, as the NomCom and the GNSO continue dialogue on identifying skill sets for the NCAs to the GNSO, skills desirable for each role (Non-Contracted House NCA, Contracted House NCA and Non-Voting NCA) could be identified for NomCom consideration. I look forward to seeing you in Dakar. If you have any questions, or we can be of assistance to you, please let us know. John Jeffrey General Counsel & Secretary ICANN <mailto:JJ@ICANN.org> JJ(a)ICANN.org <mailto:JJ@ICANN.org> From: <mailto:carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com> carlosaguirre62(a)hotmail.com <mailto:carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com> To: <mailto:john.jeffrey@icann.org> john.jeffrey(a)icann.org <mailto:john.jeffrey@icann.org> Subject: formal position requirement Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:09:01 +0000 Cordoba, October 10th 2011. Dear John Jeffrey ICANN General Councel I'm writting to you, to ask your formal opinion as General Councel in relation with the meaning of one clause of the ICANN bylaws. First, let me introduce myself: I`m Carlos Dionisio Aguirre, some of my hats are: Lawyer Specialist in business law, teacher of Economy, and Informatic`s Legislation at National University of Cordoba in Argentina , International Director of AGEIA DENSI (Academic NGO), Vice President of ADIAR (Argentinian Cyberlaw Lawyers Asociation), Former ALAC member elected and reelected by LACRALO, and currently ICANN NCA GNSO Council. Im very interested in your particular opinion & intelligence (understanding) about the following clause, and as ICANN General Councel: "BYLAWS FOR INTERNET CORPORATION FOR ASSIGNED NAMES AND NUMBERS. ARTICLE VII: NOMINATING COMMITTEE . Section 3. GNSO COUNCIL 1. Subject to the provisions of Transition Article XX, Section 5 of these Bylaws and as described in Section 5 of Article X, the GNSO Council shall consist of: a. three representatives selected from the Registries Stakeholder Group; b. three representatives selected from the Registrars Stakeholder Group; c. six representatives selected from the Commercial Stakeholder Group; d. six representatives selected from the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group; and e. three representatives selected by the ICANN Nominating Committee, one of which shall be non-voting, but otherwise entitled to participate on equal footing with other members of the GNSO Council including, e.g. the making and seconding of motions and of serving as Chair if elected. One Nominating Committee Appointee voting representative shall be assigned to each House (as described in Section 3(8) of this Article) by the Nominating Committee." This formal asking, has to do particularly with the last sentence in the paragraph exposed and highlighted in red. Some opinions by me, first: ( you can contradict if you believe I am wrong, please) -Bylaws are mandatory into ICANN environment for all and everybody. -All into ICANN environment are regulated by our bylaws. -everybody have to respect and fulfill the clauses content in ICANN bylaws. -If bylaws are representing "the legal" into ICANN environment, not fulfill this rules means "not legal". So, the fact commited after that, is null, or at least could be reviewed. -Bylaws were made by all community for ICANN community, and it is not possible that "some parts" in agreement ( through detour the decisions of the whole community), choose to change, against what bylaws are saying. Now : I am asking formaly your position as ICANN General Councel, because: IMHO the sentence mentioned is absolutely clear, transparent, no need interpretation and shows what the bylaws want in relation on it. IMHO If the NCA appointees were not assigned to each house (into GNSO), the situation would constitute a violation or at least a serious lack of commitment by NomCom. IMHO if GNSO after that (the previous situation) convalidate this (the no assign by GNSO) and decide "by consensus" of two houses (CPH & NCPH), assign one of them on each, is also a violation of our bylaws, or at least act against it. IMHO If the situation occur. What happen with the resolutions taken by GNSO? Having in account that the quorum was obtained on this way (with some members bad designated in each houses, or designated against bylaws rules. IMHO consider that the situation is serious, because is happening right now (and is not new), affect seriously "the transparency" (what is part of CORE) of ICANN. And IMHO is the same to say to all community: "don`t take in account bylaws rules, because somebody can change, in agreement with other, if it is onvenient for they ."` That is what I feel about this complicated situation, and my legal formation forced me to claim for a formal interpretation of this clause, in order to solve (IMO) the serious situation what is happening, and keep safe the concept of "transparency" into ICANN. Before to conclude, and give in advance my thanks for your prompt response, I want to say that in this event there are not involved my own interests. Im part of the ICANN community, Im part of the civil society into this, and Im currently acting by me, in my personal capacity, and in their representation. Lastly I Think would be good to get your definition and opinion in order to give advice and define this controversy. Is my intention give publicity to this Thanks, in advance All my respect. Carlos Dionisio Aguirre NCA GNSO Council - ICANN former ALAC member by LACRALO Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios [redacted]

3 2

Fwd: Invitation ICANN - Reception Dakar, October 24th
by Stéphane Van Gelder Oct. 22, 2011

Oct. 22, 2011

Councillors, At Thomas' request, please find below the invitation for the ECO reception on Monday, to which ECO has kindly invited the whole Council. Thanks, Stéphane Début du message réexpédié : > De : Melanie Busse <melanie.busse(a)eco.de> > Objet : Invitation ICANN - Reception Dakar, October 24th > Date : 20 octobre 2011 14:40:01 HAEC > À : "'stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com'" <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com> > > Dear Sir or Madam, > > eco, the Association of the German Internet Industry, kindly invites you to another reception at the upcoming 42nd ICANN meeting in Dakar. > The reception will be an opportunity for an informal exchange of thoughts in a casual setting. Meet representatives of well-known companies in the domain industry in the relaxed atmosphere of the Pool Bar, Radisson Blu Hotel. > > When: Monday October 24th from 6.30pm to 9pm > Where: At the Hotel Radisson Blu, Dakar > > > Welcome: > > Prof. Michael Rotert, Chairman eco e.V. > Oliver J. Süme, Vice Chairman eco e.V. > > GNSO - A Brief Introduction to Current and Future Challenges. > > Stéphane van Gelder, Chair of the GNSO Council, tbc > > > About eco: > eco – the Association of the German Internet Industry e.V., represents and promotes the interests of enterprises involved economically with the Internet. The association represents the enterprises in politics, facilitates communications between market participants and supports them in the marketing their products. With its Names & Numbers Forum, eco offers a platform for companies in the domain industry, such as registries and registrars where positions can be discussed and developed. > > Beyond lobbying, the eco Names & Numbers Forum regularly hosts events on current political, legal, and technical developments. We look forward to seeing you at our reception. > > The event is free of charge, but a registration is required by e-mail to > names-numbers(a)eco.de. > > At the following link you find a direction: > http://dakar42.icann.org/maps > > Radisson Blu Hotel, Dakar > Route de la Corniche Ouest > BP 16868 > Dakar Fann, Sénégal > > We look forward to seeing you there! > > > Sincerely, > > Oliver J. Süme > Vice Chairman > > i. A. Melanie Busse > Teamassistentin > > eco - Verband der deutschen Internetwirtschaft e.V. > > Berliner Verbindungsbüro > Marienstr. 12 > 10117 Berlin > > Fon: +49 (0) 30 – 20 21 567 - 0 > Fax: +49 (0) 30 – 20 21 567 - 11 > E-Mail:melanie.busse@eco.de > Web: http://www.eco.de > > --------------------------------------------------- > > eco veröffentlicht seinen eigenen Podcast. Hören Sie doch mal rein! http://www.eco.de/podcast > > --------------------------------------------------- > > eco - Verband der deutschen Internetwirtschaft e.V. > Geschäftsführer: Harald A. Summa > Vorstand: Prof. Michael Rotert (Vorsitzender), Oliver Süme (stv. > Vorsitzender), Klaus Landefeld, Thomas von Bülow, Felix Höger > Vereinsregister: Amtsgericht Köln, VR 14478 Sitz des Vereins: Köln >

1 0

GNSO Remote participation Saturday - ASO discussion replaced by Reserved Names discussion
by Glen de Saint Géry Oct. 22, 2011

Oct. 22, 2011

Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

TR: Conflict statement
by Glen de Saint Géry Oct. 22, 2011

Oct. 22, 2011

Here is my conflict statement for the GNSO. Thanks -- Mason Cole - Registrar Stakeholder Group I am principal of 5x5 Communications LLC, a communications and policy consultancy in the United States. In that capacity, I represent NameKing.com<http://fijiexchange/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://NameKing.com>, an accredited domain name registrar in Los Angeles, and I am its Registered Representative. NameKing is owned by Oversee.net<http://fijiexchange/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://Oversee.net>, which is a member of the Registrar Stakeholder Group. I am not now, nor have I ever been, in possession of or have/had access to Registry Proprietary Information or Registry Sensitive Information. Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Meeting with the Board - Qualities of a new CEO
by Jonathan Robinson Oct. 22, 2011

Oct. 22, 2011

All, PLEASE GIVE INPUT IN ORDER TO BEST INFORM TOMORROW'S DISCUSSION WITH THE BOARD Thanks, Jonathan ________________________ Hiring a new CEO What qualities do you think we ought to be seeking in a new CEO? Perhaps thinking about: . The nature of ICANN & the role it plays. Balancing technology sector, innovation, operational stability, financial management, being run in the public trust . Qualities of the previous incumbents and what you did or did not think were effective (for ICANN) about them? . The new/current world order (AOC, new gTLD programme, global economic environment, emergence of new technologies, enhanced interest of governments) . Desirable skills & experience - charisma, leadership, government relations, private sector, financial, operational, international experience What are your criteria for openness, transparency etc. in the hiring process? (bearing in mind considerations of responsibility to candidates and community, privacy, Board confidence) . Do we expect to see (and influence by e.g. public comment) the specification and key selection criteria? . Do we expect see and give feedback on the above or anything before the hiring process commences? . Do we expect to have any interaction during the course of the hiring process? Updates, information, influence? If so, how? . Do we expect to influence or comment on the final outcome? Anything else? . Any other comments or issues on the hiring of a new CEO? . Performance criteria and measures of a successful appointment? . Term & termination provisions?

1 0

Update on Whois studies
by Liz Gasster Oct. 22, 2011

Oct. 22, 2011

All, As requested, here is a short update on status of GNSO-Council supported Whois studies. Please let me know if you have any questions or if there is additional information you would like. Best regards, Liz

1 0

SAC 051 on Whois
by Liz Gasster Oct. 22, 2011

Oct. 22, 2011

All, as requested, please see: http://www.icann.org/en/committees/security/sac051.pdf SAC Report on WHOIS Terminology and Structure (19 September 2011) Best, Liz

1 0