June 2011 - council - lists.icann.org

RE: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
by Tim Ruiz June 22, 2011

June 22, 2011

Agree. Tim > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation" > From: Mary.Wong(a)law.unh.edu > Date: Wed, June 22, 2011 4:05 am > To: > Cc: "'council(a)gnso.icann.org'" <council(a)gnso.icann.org> > > > > > > Unfortunately, that brings us back to the discussion we had after whatever meeting it was, when we ended up re-drafting motions during our public meeting, and that didn't go down well either - both seem opposite ends of the spectrum (too much open discussion versus too little?). Maybe we should discuss this during the wrap-up session tomorrow. > > Cheers > Mary > > > > > Mary W S Wong > Professor of Law > Chair, Graduate IP Programs > Director, Franklin Pierce Center for IP > UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SCHOOL OF LAW > Two White Street > Concord, NH 03301 > USA > Email: mary.wong(a)law.unh.edu > Phone: 1-603-513-5143 > Webpage: http://www.law.unh.edu/marywong/index.php > Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584>>> > > > > > > > > > From: > "Neuman, Jeff" > > To: > "'tim(a)godaddy.com'" , "'adrian(a)ausregistry.com.au'" > > CC: > "'council(a)gnso.icann.org'" > > Date: > 6/22/2011 4:59 AM > > Subject: > Re: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"I think both Mikey and subsequently jumped the gun based on the debates over the weekend, which were just that....debates. > > To post an article like Kieren has could have the unintended affect of stifling open debate during our sessions. I for one prefer open debate, but not if some are going to take that out of context. > > We eventually got to the right place, but we needed to get there through debate and working through the issues. We should have been given the benefit of the doubt until we took final action. > > > Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq. > Vice President, Law & Policy > NeuStar, Inc. > Jeff.Neuman(a)neustar.biz > > > > From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@godaddy.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 04:46 AM > To: adrian(a)ausregistry.com.au > Cc: council(a)gnso.icann.org > Subject: RE: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation" > > > Of course, it is a one sided story. The Council changed nothing in the > report or recommendations. It only changed it's own motion. But, we all > know that. Too bad Kieren didn't bother to get more facts before jumping > the gun with his article. He used to be a bit more careful. > > > Tim > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation" > > From: Adrian Kinderis > > Date: Wed, June 22, 2011 2:54 am > > To: GNSO Council List > > > > http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/06/22/gnso-council-vs-volunteer-model > > > > Adrian Kinderis > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

1 0

RE: AW: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
by Tim Ruiz June 22, 2011

June 22, 2011

The motion was quoted from the report recommendations. That is always the way we have done it, and for the very reason that Mikey is concerned with - being sure that the Council does not change anything. Tim > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: AW: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation" > From: KnobenW(a)telekom.de > Date: Wed, June 22, 2011 4:01 am > To: <adrian(a)ausregistry.com.au>, <council(a)gnso.icann.org> > > > > > > @font-face { > font-family: Cambria Math; > } > @font-face { > font-family: Calibri; > } > @page WordSection1 {size: 612.0pt 792.0pt; margin: 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt; } > P.MsoNormal { > FONT-SIZE: 11pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif" > } > LI.MsoNormal { > FONT-SIZE: 11pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif" > } > DIV.MsoNormal { > FONT-SIZE: 11pt; MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif" > } > A:link { > COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99 > } > SPAN.MsoHyperlink { > COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99 > } > A:visited { > COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99 > } > SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed { > COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99 > } > SPAN.EmailStyle17 { > COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal-compose > } > .MsoChpDefault { > mso-style-type: export-only > } > DIV.WordSection1 { > page: WordSection1 > } > > > > I could follow Mikey's opinion about the council's > managerial role. I wonder whether such a detailed motion was necessary to > achieve council approval. It seemed to me a reflection of the issues having > controversely been discussed in the WG. > > This should be an item for discussion at the > wrap-up. > > Kind regards > Wolf-Ulrich > > > > Von: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org > [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] Im Auftrag von Adrian > Kinderis > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Juni 2011 09:55 > An: GNSO > Council List > Betreff: [council] Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's > "resignation" > > > > > http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/06/22/gnso-council-vs-volunteer-model > > Adrian Kinderis > > > > > >

1 0

Kieren's thoughts on Mikey's "resignation"
by Adrian Kinderis June 22, 2011

June 22, 2011

http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/06/22/gnso-council-vs-volunteer-model Adrian Kinderis

2 1

FW: Waiter
by Adrian Kinderis June 22, 2011

June 22, 2011

FYI. Adrian Kinderis -----Original Message----- From: Krista Papac Sent: Wednesday, 22 June 2011 3:11 PM To: Adrian Kinderis Subject: Waiter You are meant to serve on the Council, not serve the Council.

3 2

Re: [council] Proposed Friendly Amendment to IRTP Part B Resolved (C)
by Stéphane Van Gelder June 22, 2011

June 22, 2011

Thanks Jonathan. Stéphane Le 22 juin 2011 à 10:37, Jonathan Robinson a écrit : > Formally accepted as friendly. > > Jonathan > > From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz > Sent: 22 June 2011 07:57 > To: krosette(a)cov.com > Cc: council(a)gnso.icann.org > Subject: RE: [council] Proposed Friendly Amendment to IRTP Part B Resolved (C) > > Thanks Kristina. I believe this addresses the concerns raised by Jeff > and the WG. I accept as friendly. > > > Tim > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: [council] Proposed Friendly Amendment to IRTP Part B Resolved > > (C) > > From: "Rosette, Kristina" > > Date: Tue, June 21, 2011 6:48 pm > > To: "'council(a)gnso.icann.org'" > > > > Jonathan and Tim, > > > > Please find below a proposed amended Resolved (C). I hope you will accept it as friendly, which is how it is intended: > > > > Resolved (C), the GNSO Council acknowledges receipt of IRTP Part B Recommendation #7 and will consider this recommendation when it considers the Final Issue Report on the Current State of the UDRP. > > > > Kristina > > > > > > Kristina Rosette > > Covington & Burling LLP > > 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC > > 20004-2401 > > voice: 202-662-5173 > > direct fax: 202-778-5173 > > main fax: 202-662-6291 > > e-mail: krosette(a)cov.com > > www.cov.com/krosette >

1 0

RE: [council] Proposed Friendly Amendment to IRTP Part B Resolved (C)
by Tim Ruiz June 22, 2011

June 22, 2011

Thanks Kristina. I believe this addresses the concerns raised by Jeff and the WG. I accept as friendly. Tim > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [council] Proposed Friendly Amendment to IRTP Part B Resolved > (C) > From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette(a)cov.com> > Date: Tue, June 21, 2011 6:48 pm > To: "'council(a)gnso.icann.org'" <council(a)gnso.icann.org> > > Jonathan and Tim, > > Please find below a proposed amended Resolved (C). I hope you will accept it as friendly, which is how it is intended: > > Resolved (C), the GNSO Council acknowledges receipt of IRTP Part B Recommendation #7 and will consider this recommendation when it considers the Final Issue Report on the Current State of the UDRP. > > Kristina > > > Kristina Rosette > Covington & Burling LLP > 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC > 20004-2401 > voice: 202-662-5173 > direct fax: 202-778-5173 > main fax: 202-662-6291 > e-mail: krosette(a)cov.com > www.cov.com/krosette

2 1

RE: [council] Adobe Connect room
by Tim Ruiz June 22, 2011

June 22, 2011

Sorry, on my iPad so no can do.. Tim > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [council] Adobe Connect room > From: Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org> > Date: Wed, June 22, 2011 1:05 am > To: Council GNSO <council(a)gnso.icann.org> > > We'll be using the Council Adobe Connect room for this meeting: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/gnsocouncil/ > >

1 0

Adobe Connect room
by Marika Konings June 22, 2011

June 22, 2011

We'll be using the Council Adobe Connect room for this meeting: http://icann.adobeconnect.com/gnsocouncil/

2 2

Proposed Friendly Amendment to IRTP Part B Resolved (C)
by Rosette, Kristina June 21, 2011

June 21, 2011

Jonathan and Tim, Please find below a proposed amended Resolved (C). I hope you will accept it as friendly, which is how it is intended: Resolved (C), the GNSO Council acknowledges receipt of IRTP Part B Recommendation #7 and will consider this recommendation when it considers the Final Issue Report on the Current State of the UDRP. Kristina Kristina Rosette Covington & Burling LLP 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20004-2401 voice: 202-662-5173 direct fax: 202-778-5173 main fax: 202-662-6291 e-mail: krosette(a)cov.com www.cov.com/krosette

1 0

RE: IRTP-B Motion ammendment
by Adrian Kinderis June 21, 2011

June 21, 2011

Further to my email below I'd like to suggest the following amendment; Proposed amendment: Delete resolved clause (F) and replace it with the following resolved clause: Resolved (F), the GNSO Council will consider IRTP Part B Recommendation #3 concerning the request of an Issue Report on the requirement of 'thick' WHOIS for all incumbent gTLDs at its next meeting on 21 July. Adrian Kinderis From: Adrian Kinderis Sent: Tuesday, 21 June 2011 5:29 PM To: GNSO Council List Subject: IRTP-B Motion ammendment All, Much to Glen's displeasure I will soon be offering a friendly amendment to the IRTP-B Motion. The Registrars had some good discussion today and we were unable to come to a common position on the complete motion. I will send through my amended motion shortly but wanted to give you a head's up. Thanks. Adrian Kinderis

3 2