June 2012 - council - lists.icann.org

Call for Volunteers: Developing the Process for Root IDN Table Creation and Maintenance
by Glen de Saint Géry 18 Jun '12

18 Jun '12

http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-18jun12-en.htm Call for Volunteers: Developing the Process for Root IDN Table Creation and Maintenance 18 June 2012 * Deadline for responses is 13 July 2012 ICANN is seeking volunteers to work on advancing IDN capabilities in the DNS. The project 2.1 "Root IDN Table Process" part of the IDN Variant TLD Program, is designed to develop, in consultation with the community, the process to define: * allowed code points, * corresponding variant code points, and * related allowed states for IDN Variant TLDs. ICANN is soliciting participation from volunteers with the following areas of expertise: IDNA, DNS, Linguistics/Unicode, Policy. The project team will include additional consultant expertise to help in the process. ICANN has a limited budget to support team meetings such as travel, accommodation, and other expenses. General responsibilities for volunteers: * Contribute to developing the Process for Root IDN Table Creation and Maintenance * Research and provide input on issues discussed during meetings * Attend two face-to-face meetings (likely during the last week of August in Los Angeles, US, and mid-October 2012 in Toronto, Canada) * Participate in regular teleconferences (time to be determined) * Expected time commitment of 2 to 4 hours per week during a 4-month period IDNA Expertise qualifications: * Expertise with IDNA and preferably active on internationalization work * Participation in relevant IDNA working groups DNS Expertise qualifications: * Expertise with DNS standards * Active in related DNS technical fora (e.g., IETF DNSext, DNSop) Linguistics/Unicode expertise qualifications: * Expertise in linguistics * Familiarity with Unicode Policy expertise qualifications: * Participation in ICANN's policy development process; or * Have participated in, at least, one ICANN working group, preferably on IDN related issues Selection and Recruitment Process for Case Study Members: * Indications of interest should be sent to idnvarianttlds(a)icann.org<mailto:idnvarianttlds@icann.org> no later than 13 July 2012. * Interested experts are invited to submit a résumé (Curriculum Vitae) and an expression of interest statement demonstrating how they meet the qualifications for one or more of the areas of expertise specified above. * The ICANN IDN Variant TLD Program team will select the team members ensuring a diverse composition of the members in terms of language/script communities represented. * Applicants will be notified no later than 30 July 2012. Background on the IDN Variant TLD Program On 20 April 2011, ICANN announced the IDN Variant Issues Project to explore the benefits and risks associated with the potential inclusion of IDN variant TLDs in the DNS root zone. This project was initiated in response to a 2010 ICANN Board of Directors resolution<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-25sep10-en.htm#2…>. Two phases of the project have been completed to date. Phase I involved the formation of six case study teams for the Arabic, Chinese, Cyrillic, Devanagari, Greek and Latin scripts. These teams were comprised of community experts with support from ICANN that worked on identifying issues related to IDN variant TLDs for each particular script, resulting in the publication in October 2011 of six individual reports detailing their findings. Phase II focused on integrating those six case study reports into the Integrated Issues Report. To complete this phase, ICANN formed a coordination team comprised of experts from each of the case study teams. The coordination team advised ICANN on completing the Integrated Issues Report, which summarizes and categorizes the various issues related to the identification and management of IDN variant TLDs. The next phase (phase III) outlined in the proposed program plan<http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/idn-variant-tld-revised-program…> includes a number of activities resulting from the issues identified in the final Integrated Issues Report<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/idn/idn-vip-integrated-issues-final-clean…> [PDF, 2.15 MB]. The work is now focused on using the approach outlined in the Integrated Issues Report to define milestones that must be completed to manage the implementation of IDN variant TLDs. The goal of the program is to define the necessary processes that must be in place to enable the management of variant TLDs. This incorporates the creation and maintenance of IDN tables for the root zone, and updating operational processes as appropriate to allow for the implementation of the IDN variant TLDs. Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

ICANN Policy Update -- June 2012
by Glen de Saint Géry 17 Jun '12

17 Jun '12

[http://www.icann.org/images/gradlogo_bow.jpg]<http://www.icann.org/> Policy Update Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update Volume 12, Issue 5 — June 2012 ________________________________ Contents Across ICANN 1. ICANN 44 Preview<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-jun12-en.htm#1> 2. Issues Currently Open for Public Comment<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-jun12-en.htm#2> ccNSO 3. Comores and Iceland Join ccNSO<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-jun12-en.htm#3> 4. Strategic and Operational Planning Working Group Submits Comments on ICANN Budget<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-jun12-en.htm#4> 5. ccNSO Council Requests Changes to Public Comment Process<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-jun12-en.htm#5> 6. ccNSO Joins ICANN In Support of Protecting All Two-Letter ASCII Strings<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-jun12-en.htm#6> 7. ccNSO Travel Funding for ICANN 45 Now Open <http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-jun12-en.htm#7> GNSO 8. GNSO Working Group Submits Initial Draft of Whois Technical Requirements Study <http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-jun12-en.htm#8> 9. IRTP Part C Initial Report Published: New Change of Registrant Policy, Time-Limiting Form of Authorization, Requiring Registries to use IANA IDs<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-jun12-en.htm#9> 10. Community Asked to Review Draft Report on Whois Proxy/Privacy Reveal and Relay Feasibility Survey <http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-jun12-en.htm#10> ASO 11. ICANN Board Ratifies Policy Proposal for Recovered IPv4 Address Blocks <http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-jun12-en.htm#11> At-Large 12. At-Large Community Members Prepare for ICANN’s Prague Meeting including Celebrating the 10th Anniversary of the ALAC<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-jun12-en.htm#12> 13. ALAC Continues High Number of Policy Statements, Comments and Communications <http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-jun12-en.htm#13> 14. LACRALO Engages in Organizational Strengthening Activities: Capacity Building Sessions and Working Groups<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-jun12-en.htm#14> SSAC 15. Issues Active in the SSAC<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-jun12-en.htm#15> GAC 16. Where to Find GAC Information<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/policy/update/update-jun12-en.htm#16>

1 0

Document and motion Deadline Tuesday 19 June for GNSO Council meeting 27 June at 12:00 UTC
by Glen de Saint Géry 15 Jun '12

15 Jun '12

Dear Councillors, Reports, motions and documents for consideration are due no later than (NLT) 8 days in advance (i.e. TUESDAY, 19 June 2012) of the Prague GNSO Open Council meeting on 27 June 2012 at 12:00 UTC. Motions should be sent to the Council mailing list and will then be posted on the Wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+27+June+2012 Thank you very much. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Fwd: ICANN Finance Open Session - FY13 Budget
by Stéphane Van Gelder 15 Jun '12

15 Jun '12

Councillors, FYI in case you wish to participate. Stéphane Van Gelder Directeur Général / General manager INDOM Group NBT France ---------------- Head of Domain Operations Group NBT Début du message réexpédié : > De : "Xavier J. Calvez" <xavier.calvez(a)icann.org> > Objet : ICANN Finance Open Session - FY13 Budget > Date : 13 juin 2012 23:13:24 HAEC > À : Lesley Cowley <lesley.cowley(a)nominet.org.uk>, Heather <Heather.Dryden(a)ic.gc.ca>, 'Stéphane Van Gelder' <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com>, "jcurran(a)arin.net" <jcurran(a)arin.net>, 'Louie ' <louie(a)louie.net>, Olivier Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com>, Patrik Fältström <patrik(a)frobbit.se>, "junsec(a)wide.ad.jp" <junsec(a)wide.ad.jp>, Steven Metalitz <met(a)msk.com>, Marilyn Cade <marilynscade(a)hotmail.com>, "tonyarholmes(a)btinternet.com" <tonyarholmes(a)btinternet.com>, Robin Gross <robin(a)ipjustice.org>, "dave(a)difference.com.au" <dave(a)difference.com.au>, "alain.berranger(a)gmail.com" <alain.berranger(a)gmail.com>, "matt.serlin(a)markmonitor.com" <matt.serlin(a)markmonitor.com>, "dmaher(a)pir.org" <dmaher(a)pir.org>, Bart Boswinkel <bart.boswinkel(a)icann.org>, Akram Atallah <akram.atallah(a)icann.org>, Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, Jeannie Ellers <jeannie.ellers(a)icann.org>, Liz Gasster <liz.gasster(a)icann.org>, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen(a)icann.org>, Heidi Ullrich <Heidi.Ullrich(a)icann.org>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, Robert Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth(a)icann.org>, Tim Cole <Tim.Cole(a)icann.org>, Karla Valente <karla.valente(a)icann.org> > Cc : David Olive <david.olive(a)icann.org>, Janice Douma Lange <janice.lange(a)icann.org>, Aba Diakite <aba.diakite(a)icann.org>, "Maya S. Reynolds" <maya.reynolds(a)icann.org> > > When: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 11:00 AM-12:30 PM. Central Europe Standard Time > Where: Hilton Prague - Karlin I/II Room > > *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* > > > > ICANN Finance Open Session – FY13 Budget > Date: > Wednesday, June 27 > Time: > 11:00am-12:30pm (Prague), 9:00am-10:30am (UTC), 2:00am-3:30am (PDT), 5:00am-6:30am (EDT) > Other Time Zone: > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=ICANN+Finance+Open… > > Location: > Hilton Prague Hotel – Karlin I/II Room (http://www.hilton.com/en/hotels/content/PRGHITW/media/images/floorplans/prg…) > > > > > Dear All, > > I would like to build on the dialogue that has been started with several community members on both the overall ICANN Budget Planning process and continued discussion on the FY13 draft Budget and SO/AC requests, by inviting you or a delegate from your community to participate with me in 2 sessions at the ICANN Public Meeting in Prague. > > The Wednesday 27 June session is open to the public, with a need for SO and AC leader support and engagement, in order to finalize discussion on the public comments associated with the draft FY13 Operating Plan and Budget, which includes the Additional Budget Requests for FY13 and how that process worked from a community perspective this year. Please see the attached agenda for more detail on the discussion we would like to engage in with you on this topic. > > I am aware that there are several community leaders working session proposed for Prague, including a working group on the Strategic Planning process and community discussion on Outreach, and appreciate your efforts to provide coverage with a delegate at each of the valuable sessions. > If you (or your delegates) plan to join the session remotely and need an operator to dial-out, please contact Maya Reynolds (maya.reynolds(a)icann.org) for assistance by Tuesday, June 19. > > I look forward to seeing you in Prague. > > Sincerely, > > Xavier Calvez, CFO > ICANN – Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

1 0

WSWG Draft Survey Announcement
by Liz Gasster 15 Jun '12

15 Jun '12

Dear all, On behalf of the WHOIS Survey Working Group (WSWG), please find attached a link to the WG's Draft Survey. Please note that in conjunction with the Survey availability, a public comment forum has been opened (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/draft-whois-requirements-survey…). Comments may be submitted until 20 June 2012 following which the comment reply period will open. The Working Group is seeking community feedback on the draft, which will be considered by GNSO Council and later released to the community for participation in the WHOIS survey. The Survey can be accessed here: http://icann.isoc.ug/whoissurvey/?sid=71483. You are welcome to take the survey at your convenience. By answering only the first question, you will be able to review the contents of the survey if you should choose not to provide answers. Additionally, users of the survey will see a free-form text dialogue box at the bottom of each section of the survey. You may use this space to provide specific feedback with respect to the questions loaded for that section. If you use this feature, be sure to include your identity so that we may relate your response to the public comment review process. An update could be provided in Prague if time permits and the Council would like a briefing. In the meantime, if you have any comments or questions, please feel free to share those. Best regards, Liz Gasster Survey: http://icann.isoc.ug/whoissurvey/?sid=71483 Public Comment: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/draft-whois-requirements-survey…

2 1

GAC interaction
by Stéphane Van Gelder 15 Jun '12

15 Jun '12

Councillors, You will recall that a few days ago, the GAC sent us some proposed topics for our interaction with them in Prague. You will also recall that when I posted these topics here, I explained that some seemed unclear. Heather Dryden, the GAC Chair, has now sent me additional notes on the topics in question. Please see below her comments. I suggest we respond so any proposed comments back would be useful. Thanks. I think it's more of a general request to find out about the new pdp: why have one? how it would work etc. As you might know, the GAC is particularly interested in ways to integrate GAC advice early on in the process, so that a community consensus policy could be put forward to the Board by the GNSO, wherever possible. The work of the Board/GAC Recommendation Implementation working group (to implement the various GAC-related A&T) is also still underway and there is a recommendation about finding a way to include GAC advice early in the pdp. All this to say, that if this does not resonate with you, or the topic could be recast to make it more beneficial, then by all means make suggestions. Would you like an update from the GAC on the BGRI work? Something else? On the second topic, no major objective. GAC colleagues might not have considered how the current round could impact the GNSO and the composition of its stakeholder groups. If you could briefly talk about how the GNSO is planning for this or is it a "wait and see" approach, what are the expected impacts...? Again, happy to hear your perspective. Stéphane Van Gelder Directeur Général / General manager INDOM Group NBT France ---------------- Head of Domain Operations Group NBT

1 0

WHOIS Technical Requirements Survey - Draft
by Glen de Saint Géry 14 Jun '12

14 Jun '12

http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/draft-whois-requirements-survey… WHOIS Technical Requirements Survey - Draft Comment/Reply Periods (*) Important Information Links Comment Open: 30 May 2012 Comment Close: 20 June 2012 Close Time (UTC): 23:59 Public Comment Announcement<http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-30may12-en.htm> Reply Open: 20 June 2012 To Submit Your Comments (Forum)<mailto:draft-whois-requirements-survey@icann.org> Reply Close: 16 July 2012 View Comments Submitted<http://forum.icann.org/lists/draft-whois-requirements-survey/> Close Time (UTC): 23:59 Report of Public Comments Brief Overview Originating Organization: GNSO Council - WHOIS Survey Working Group Categories/Tags: Policy Processes Purpose (Brief): The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council's WHOIS Survey Working Group (WSWG) requests community input on the draft WHOIS Technical Requirements Survey. The Working Group is soliciting input from experts on technical requirements for a new WHOIS protocol, in particular people knowledgeable about technical aspects of WHOIS who can help assess if the survey asks the right questions and in the right style to elicit technical feedback. The Working Group seeks specific suggestions on changes to language and questions that will make it clearer for experts to complete. Current Status: This Public Comment solicitation represents an opportunity for the community to share perspectives on the proposed draft WHOIS Technical Requirements Survey. In parallel, the WSWG will conduct a Webinar to promote the survey and solicit additional feedback. Next Steps: The WSWG will consider the comments received as part of their deliberations and creation of the final version of the WHOIS Requirements Survey. Upon submission to the GNSO Council, the survey will be announced and released for community participation. The survey will be available for 30 days. Afterwards, the WSWG will compile, analyze and report on the survey results to produce a final report outlining possible WHOIS Technical requirements. Staff Contact: Liz Gasster Email: policy.staff(a)icann.org<mailto:policy.staff@icann.org?subject=More%20information%20on%20the%20WHOIS%20Technical%20Requirements%20Survey%20-%20Draft%20public%20comment%20period> Detailed Information Section I: Description, Explanation, and Purpose The WHOIS Survey Working Group produced a draft survey of WHOIS Technical Requirements at the request of the GNSO Council Resolution (http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions#20111006-1). The Working Group is seeking community feedback on the draft, which will be considered by GNSO Council and later released to the community for participation in the WHOIS survey. The Survey can be accessed here: http://icann.isoc.ug/whoissurvey/?sid=71483 The Working Group will accept community feedback via the public comment forum. Additionally, users of the survey will see a free-form text dialogue box at the bottom of each section of the survey. Users may use this space to provide specific feedback with respect to the questions loaded for that section. If you use this feature, be sure to include your identity so that we may relate your response to the public comment review process. Section II: Background The Working Group aims to draft, implement, and analyze the results of a survey measuring the level of support for various technical requirements outlined in the GNSO WHOIS Service Requirement Report (http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/whois-service-requirements-final-report-… [PDF, 633 KB]). The WHOIS Survey Working Group will produce a Report to be delivered to the GNSO Council describing the results of the survey and recommendations for next steps for the GNSO Council's consideration concerning the WHOIS service requirements. Section III: Document and Resource Links 1. WHOIS Requirements Survey - http://icann.isoc.ug/whoissurvey/?sid=71483 2. PDF of WHOIS Requirements Survey - http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/draft-whois-survey-31may12-en.pdf [PDF, 121 KB] 3. WSWG Charter - http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/charter-wswg-06oct11-en.pdf [PDF, 476 KB] 4. WSWG Wiki - https://community.icann.org/display/WSDT/WHOIS+Survey+Working+Group+-+Home 5. GNSO WHOIS Service Requirement Report - http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois/whois-service-requirements-final-report-… [PDF, 633 KB] Section IV: Additional Information None (*) Comments submitted after the posted Close Date/Time are not guaranteed to be considered in any final summary, analysis, reporting, or decision-making that takes place once this period lapses. Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Reveal Day 13 June 2012 - New gTLD Applied-For Strings
by Glen de Saint Géry 13 Jun '12

13 Jun '12

http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/application-results/strings-120… Reveal Day 13 June 2012 - New gTLD Applied-For Strings Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

UDRP Domain Name Locking WG Request
by Joy Liddicoat 13 Jun '12

13 Jun '12

Dear Councillors, I've been asked to alert you to a request by the UDRP Domain Name Locking WG for clarification from the Council in relation to one aspect of its work, namely: In its review of the Charter for the Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings Working Group (https://community.icann.org/display/udrpproceedings/3.+WG+Charter), the WG has noticed that no specific mention is made of the 'unlocking' of a domain name once the UDRP proceedings are completed. From the WG's perspective, this is an implicit part of the question as potential recommendations on how / when to lock a domain name subject to UDRP Proceedings should also be balanced by recommendations on how a domain name can / should be unlocked once the UDRP proceedings have been completed. Therefore, the WG has requested the Council Liaison to the WG to raise this issue with the GNSO Council and confirm that the WG's interpretation of the charter is correct. The WG looks forward to receiving the Council's feedback at its meeting with the GNSO Council in Prague during which an update on the WG's activities to date will also be provided and any further questions may be answered. Can we please add this item to the agenda? Kind regards Joy Liddicoat Project Coordinator Internet Rights are Human Rights www.apc.org <http://www.apc.org/>

2 1

Re: Communication of the output of CWGs / Future of CWGs
by Stéphane Van Gelder 12 Jun '12

12 Jun '12

Hi Lesley, Thanks for this. I am copying the Council for their information and I agree that this would be an excellent topic for our joint meeting in Prague. Best, Stéphane Van Gelder Directeur Général / General manager INDOM Group NBT France ---------------- Head of Domain Operations Group NBT Le 12 juin 2012 à 22:50, Lesley Cowley a écrit : > Hi Stéphane, > > Further to your email of 15th March on cross community working groups to the chairs of the SO’s and AC’s, the ccNSO Council has now been able to review the drafting team output. > > The ccNSO Council appreciates the work done to date by the GNSO. It is our understanding that the GNSO sought input and feedback from other SO’s and AC’s on: > > 1. The principles themselves, and > 2. The route forward for community-wide adoption or development of a related set of principles for the operation of Cross-Community Working Groups > > On the principles, and acknowledging they are high level, some aspects relating to the creation, working and decision-making processes relating to cross-community working groups may need additional coverage by principles, in particular: > Defining the purpose and scope of a working group; > What should be included in a charter > Decision making by the participating SO’s and AC’s, in particular in case of >> o Disagreement across participating SO’s and AC’s or >> o Between WG and (one of the) a participating SO or AC. > The ccNSO Council views are based on an analysis of both the principles and our experience with cross community working groups to date. This analysis is available. > > As to the route forward, the ccNSO Council suggests the setting-up of a cross-community working group, with the goal to arrive at common set of principles and the identification of areas of divergence in guidelines and practices across SO’s and AC’s. Such a WG should take into account the experiences of the cross community working groups to date (both those that are active and closed) and include the active participation of ICANN staff, who over time have gained significant experience with the formation and functioning of cross community working groups. > > Perhaps we could discuss next steps at the SO/AC Chair's meeting and or the ccNSO – GNSO lunch meeting in Prague? > > Kind regards, > > Lesley Cowley OBE, > Chair of the ccNSO > Lesley Cowley, OBE > CEO > Nominet > Minerva House > Edmund Halley Road > Oxford Science Park > Oxford, OX4 4DQ > UK > > Tel: +44-(0)-1865-332211 > http://www.nominet.org.uk/ > > From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder(a)indom.com> > Date: Thursday, 15 March 2012 21:30 > To: Lesley Cowley <lesley(a)nominet.org.uk>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl(a)gih.com>, Patrik Fältström <patrik(a)frobbit.se>, John Curran <jcurran(a)arin.net>, Heather Dryden <Heather.Dryden(a)ic.gc.ca>, Louie Lee <louie(a)louie.net> > Subject: Communication of the output of CWGs / Future of CWGs > > Dear Colleagues, > > You may be aware that over the course of last year the GNSO Council launched a drafting team to examine the issues associated with the formation and operation of Community / Cross-Community working groups. > > The output of the drafting team was encapsulated in a set of draft principles which were accepted by the Council through a motion passed at the 14 March 2012 meeting of the GNSO Council. > > The motion is linked to here: > > https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+14+March+20… > > The draft principles are linked to here: > > http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-principles-for-cwgs-23dec11-en.pdf > > It is important to note here that work undertaken by the drafting team was undertaken specifically in order to develop a GNSO Council agreed perspective. > The output shared here is not in any way intended to presume that this is a broader, community agreed position. > > Accordingly we are offering this work as input into the discussion which you may wish to initiate or further develop within your organisation or committee. > > Best, > > Stéphane Van Gelder > GNSO Council Chair

1 0