January 2015 - council - lists.icann.org

GNSO Policy & Implementation Working Group Publishes Initial Recommendations Report for Public Comment
by Glen de Saint Géry 20 Jan '15

20 Jan '15

https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2015-01-19-en GNSO Policy & Implementation Working Group Publishes Initial Recommendations Report for Public Comment Forum Announcement: Comment Period Opens on Date: 19 January 2015 Categories/Tags: Policy Processes Purpose (Brief): Mainly as a result of discussions stemming from implementation related issues of the new generic Top-Level Doman (gTLD) program, there has been an increased focus on which topics call for policy and which call for implementation work, including which processes should be used, at what time and how issues which are the subject of diverging opinions during the implementation process should be acted upon. Following several discussions, including the publication of a staff discussion paper and a community session during the ICANN meeting in Beijing in April 2013, the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council decided in July 2013 to form a Working Group (WG) which was tasked to provide the GNSO Council with a set of recommendations on a number of questions that specifically relate to policy and implementation in a GNSO context. The WG has now published its Initial Recommendations Report<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/policy-implementation/pi-wg-initial-recomme…> [PDF, 1.46 MB] for community input which can be provided either through input received via this public comment forum or via the following survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/PI-InitialReport Public Comment Box Link: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/policy-implementation-2015-01-19-en Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Proposed way forward (Re: [council] RE: IDN Implementation Guidelines)
by Mary Wong 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

Dear all, Given that the 31 January deadline is approaching quickly, staff would like to suggest a possible way forward for the GNSO in respect of providing the requested input into the pending update of the IDN Implementation Guidelines. Since Edmon has already volunteered to assist in the effort, we would like to suggest that a small group of interested Councilors and community members join him to: (1) provide Akram Atallah (GDD President) and Sarmad Hussain (IDN Programs Senior Manager) with an expected date by which the GNSO input will be provided; and (2) develop (as requested) a list of issues to be reviewed as part of the update of the Guidelines. I attach a proposed draft letter to Akram that can be sent by the group, assuming the Council approves this plan. As a reminder, these Guidelines concern the possibility that implementation of IDNs at the second level may create issues relating to cybersquatting and consumer confusion. It will therefore be critical for all of the GNSO¹s constituencies and stakeholder groups who are concerned about these issues to contribute to scoping the review, and participating in the review when it takes place. As such, compiling a list of issues from the GNSO community for consideration as part of that scoping exercise would be extremely helpful and potentially important. You may recall that this topic was the subject of some lively discussion among the Council at the Los Angeles meeting. If the suggested approach is unobjectionable, this item will be placed on the consent agenda for the Council¹s 29 January meeting, to ensure timely notification to Akram and his staff, and to enable the group of volunteers to begin their work. As a reminder, Sarmad is due to provide his regular briefing/update to the GNSO during the GNSO¹s Working Sessions in Singapore as well. Staff will also reach out to individual Councilors and community members who have expressed interest in the effort, to facilitate diverse representation within the small group. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org From: Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org> Date: Thursday, January 15, 2015 at 15:47 To: 'Edmon Chung' <edmon(a)registry.asia>, "council(a)gnso.icann.org" <council(a)gnso.icann.org> Cc: 'Ching Chiao' <chiao(a)brandma.co> Subject: Re: [council] RE: IDN Implementation Guidelines > Dear all, > > Just following up on this, per the discussion on the GNSO Council call earlier > today. As noted below, Edmon Chung has volunteered for this effort, and we are > awaiting confirmation from the Registries SG as to whether and who will also > be working on the matter. As a reminder, the current request is for the GNSO > to provide a list of initial issues that it believes should be examined when > the IDN Implementation Guidelines (dating from 2011) are updated. As such, we > expect that following compilation of these issues, including from other parts > of the ICANN community (such as the ccNSO), our IDN Program colleagues will > then work with the GNSO and ccNSO on the actual updating of the Guidelines. > > Since the Guidelines deal with concerns over cyber-squatting and consumer > confusion at the second level in IDNs, their pending update may be of broad > interest to many GNSO groups and constituencies. As noted on the Council call, > one way for the GNSO to create a list of issues for consideration during the > forthcoming update exercise may be for volunteers to form an informal > discussion group, with the goal to create such a list by either 30 January > 2015 (the requested deadline) or some other date to be determined in > consultation with the ICANN staff members leading the initiative. > > Please let me know who else besides Edmon will be working on the GNSO list of > issues, and how we as policy support staff can assist with the effort. For > your convenience, a copy of the original request to the GNSO from Akram > Atallah is attached. > > Thanks and cheers > Mary > > Mary Wong > Senior Policy Director > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) > Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 > Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org > > > > From: Donna Austin <Donna.Austin(a)ariservices.com> > Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 at 13:17 > To: "jrobinson(a)afilias.info" <jrobinson(a)afilias.info>, 'Edmon Chung' > <edmon(a)registry.asia>, "council(a)gnso.icann.org" <council(a)gnso.icann.org> > Cc: 'Ching Chiao' <chiao(a)brandma.co>, "rmohan(a)afilias.info" > <rmohan(a)afilias.info> > Subject: RE: [council] RE: IDN Implementation Guidelines > >> Jonathan >> >> I¹m checking internally, I¹ll get back to you tomorrow. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Donna >> >> DONNA AUSTIN >> Policy and Industry Affairs Manager >> >> ARI REGISTRY SERVICES >> Melbourne|Los Angeles >> P +1 310 890 9655 >> P +61 3 9866 3710 >> E donna.austin(a)ariservices.com <mailto:donna.austin@ariservices.com> >> W www.ariservices.com <http://www.ariservices.com/> >> >> Follow us on Twitter <https://twitter.com/ARIservices> >> >> The information contained in this communication is intended for the named >> recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally >> privileged and confidential information and if you are not an intended >> recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance >> on it. If you have received this communication in error, please delete all >> copies from your system and notify us immediately. >> >> >> From: owner-council(a)gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.org] On >> Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson >> Sent: Tuesday, 6 January 2015 7:37 AM >> To: 'Edmon Chung'; council(a)gnso.icann.org >> Cc: 'Ching Chiao'; 'Ram Mohan' >> Subject: [council] RE: IDN Implementation Guidelines >> >> Many thanks Edmon, >> >> Any other takers? >> >> Jonathan >> >> >> From: Edmon Chung [mailto:edmon@registry.asia] >> Sent: 06 January 2015 10:13 >> To: jrobinson(a)afilias.info; council(a)gnso.icann.org >> Cc: 'Ching Chiao'; 'Ram Mohan' >> Subject: RE: IDN Implementation Guidelines >> >> Hi Jonathan, >> >> Thanks for forwarding this. >> >> The key response or thought I have on this is that the GNSO must be >> represented in the working committee that will be updating the IDN >> Guidelines. >> >> On this, I am more than happy to volunteer myself and participate in the >> work. >> >> In general, I think this will be a much needed update so should be welcomed. >> In fact, part of the outputs from the JIG have direct input and have >> suggested updates to the IDN Guidelines. At the same time, because it is a >> document directly related to gTLD policies (I am not sure if the p is small >> or capital at this point until new draft is being put forward), caution must >> be taken to consider contractual conditions. >> >> Edmon >> >> >> >> >> From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info] >> Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2015 5:33 PM >> To: council(a)gnso.icann.org >> Cc: edmon(a)registry.asia; Ching Chiao; Ram Mohan >> Subject: RE: IDN Implementation Guidelines >> >> Councillors, >> >> A reminder that this letter (re-attached) seeks initial input by 30 January >> 2014. >> >> Is anyone willing to pick this up and assist please? >> >> Thank-you. >> >> >> Jonathan >> >> >> From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@afilias.info] >> Sent: 08 December 2014 10:10 >> To: council(a)gnso.icann.org GNSO (council(a)gnso.icann.org) >> Subject: FW: IDN Implementation Guidelines >> >> All, >> >> Please see attached and note that the request seeks some initial input by 30 >> January 2015. >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> Jonathan >> >> >> From: Akram Atallah [mailto:akram.atallah@icann.org] >> Sent: 04 December 2014 00:24 >> To: jonathan.robinson(a)ipracon.com; Jonathan Robinson >> Cc: Mary Wong; Cyrus Namazi; Sarmad Hussain; bruce.tonkin(a)melbourneit.com.au; >> Marika Konings >> Subject: IDN Implementation Guidelines >> >> >> Dear Jonathan, >> >> In the ICANN 50 meeting, the GNSO council and members met with the Board >> Variant Working Group (BV-WG) and suggested to update the IDN Implementation >> Guidelines, the last revision was in 2011. >> >> Based on follow up discussions, during the ICANN 51 meeting the BV-WG >> directed the staff to reach out to the GNSO and ccNSO to collect an initial >> list of issues which should be addressed if this update is undertaken. This >> request is outlined in the attached letter. >> >> Thank you for your support in this matter. >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Best, >> >> Akram

1 0

Action Items from Council meeting 15 January 2015
by Glen de Saint Géry 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

Dear Councillors, Please find the action items arising from the Council meeting on 15 January 2015. Please review and let me know if any have been misstated or left out. Please be reminded that the next Council meeting is on Thursday, 29 January 2015 at 12:00 UTC. In consultation with Jonathan, given that 11:00 UTC will conflict with the Policy Webinar, and given that the meeting is likely to last for one hour, the time has been moved to 12:00 UTC. Item 2: Opening Remarks / Review of Projects & Action List Arising from the Action List<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Action+Items>: · Expert Working Group (EWG) The Board/GNSO group met last week via phone call and are working through the issues trying to determine which ones would be helpful to further consider prior to a PDP. Work will soon start on a Preliminary Issue Report and the draft charter. There will be further reporting during the GNSO working sessions in Singapore on Saturday 7 February 2015 · New GAC Leadership Jonathan Robinson contacted Thomas Schneider the new GAC chair and will follow up in Singapore with the GAC vice-chairs Item 3: Consent agenda Approve the GNSO Council Recommendations Report<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/council-board-irtp-d-05jan15-en.pdf> to the ICANN Board concerning IRTP Part D No votes against and no abstentions All Councillors present voted to accept the consent agenda as it stands. Note: The outcome<http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg16986.html> of the vote that was conducted on the BWG NomCom report. It was encouraging and positive to see that that the new process, (voting outside of a Council meeting works) and enabled timely submission of input to the public comment period to the BWG NomCom<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bwg-nomcom-2014-08-21-en> Item 4: UPDATE - Cross Community Working Group to develop a transition proposal for IANA stewardship on naming related functions Action items · Council must take part of its shared responsibility as a chartering organization to uphold the dialogue with the other parties including the Board. · Council could consider making a public statement where it applauds the work done from all the groups, (the numbers, names and the protocols) and offer a public statement of support recognizing the good work and the benefit from obtaining a coherent approach even if it has taken longer than the set-out timeline. The statement could also note that while meeting the timeline is important, not doing so in the interest of finding the right solution attests to the success of the multi stakeholder model. · Provide statement before next Council meeting. Avri Doria and Tony Holmes volunteered to work on the effort · Discussion item for Board GNSO meeting in Singapore on Sunday 8 February 2015 Item 5: UPDATE - Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability Action Item The GNSO Council is one of the group's chartering organizations and ultimately the work of the group will need to be signed off on by the GNSO through the GNSO Council. Important that the GNSO Council is continuously and properly appraised of this work and that Councillors take on the responsibility to keep their groups informed. Item 6: UPDATE - Prospective policy work on "name collision" Action Item: · Discussion item for Board GNSO meeting in Singapore on Sunday 8 February: Unusual practices unrelated to Names collision and which need to find a different home from name collision to be included. · Council supported sending the letter<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/gnso-council-to-namazi-12jan15-en.pdf> subject to non-material edits and/or any other further comments by 24 hours, that is 1800 UTC Friday 16 January 2015. Item 7: DISCUSSION - Board resolution concerning future gTLD Application Rounds Action Item: Council supported sending the letter<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/robinson-to-crocker-12jan15-en.pdf> subject to non-material edits and/or any other further comments by 24 hours, that is 1800 UTC Monday 19 January 2015 Item 8: UPDATE - GNSO / GAC Consultation Group and related work · Action Items: Consider reviewing the membership of the GAC GNSO Consultation group at the face to face meeting on Monday 9 February 2015 in Singapore. · Volker Greimann to provide an updated draft of the 'analysis of the GAC communiqué to advise the Board of policy implications' to the Council list in preparation for next Council meeting. · Councillors encouraged to comment on the list about which issues they would like to see addressed and proposals for analysis. · Item 9: Update: Planning for ICANN meeting in Singapore - key direction & themes Jonathan Robinson to send a letter to the Council list requesting suggestions for various topics to be discussed with the Board, the GAC and ccNSO. · Councillors are encouraged to send discussion topics to Jonathan Robinson, Volker Greimann and Glen de Saint Géry. Item 10: Any Other Business Action Items 10.1 - Correspondence with NGPC on IGO & RCRC. Update expected at Singapore meeting beginning February 2015. 10.2 - Consideration of a CWG to deal with new gTLD auction proceeds Item for the GNSO weekend working sessions: Brainstorming session followed by cross community working group to start as soon as possible, ideally at the Singapore meeting. 10.3 - Note that the Translation & Transliteration PDP WG Initial Report is out for public comment Councillors are encouraged to inform their groups and contribute to the public comment<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/transliteration-contact-initial-2014-…> period. 10.4 - Request for extension of time for Issue Report on Rights Protection Mechanisms Mary Wong to resend the request<http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg16968.html> to the Council mailing list and submit it to the Council as a consent agenda item for the next Council meeting on 29 January 2015. 10.5 IDN Implementation Guidelines · Mary Wong to resend original request<http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg17000.html> from Akram Atallah. · Form an informal group of interested volunteers to provide input. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Next Council meeting Thursday 29 January 2015 at 11:00 UTC
by Glen de Saint Géry 16 Jan '15

16 Jan '15

Correction : To read : This is also to give you notice that the reports, motions and documents for consideration are due no later than (NLT) 10 days in advance (i.e. MONDAY, 19 January 2015 at 23:59 UTC) of the GNSO Council meeting on 29 JANUARY 2015 at 11:00 UTC. Apologies. Kind regards, Glen From: Glen de Saint Géry Sent: vendredi 16 janvier 2015 23:35 To: Council GNSO Subject: FW: Next Council meeting Dear Councillors, Further to the note below, and having heard no objections and in consultation with the chair, Jonathan Robinson, the next Council meeting will be on Thursday, 29 January at 11:00 UTC. This is also to give you notice that the reports, motions and documents for consideration are due no later than (NLT) 10 days in advance (i.e. MONDAY, 19 January 2015 at 23:59 UTC) of the GNSO Council meeting on 29 December 2015 at 11:00 UTC. Motions should be sent to the Council mailing list and will then be posted on the Wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+29+January+… Thank you very much. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org From: Glen de Saint Géry Sent: vendredi 16 janvier 2015 11:46 To: Council GNSO Subject: Next Council meeting Dear Councillors, On the Council call yesterday it was mentioned that the next Council meeting would be on 28 January 2015 at 11 :00 UTC which is a Wednesday. http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#jan 28 January GNSO Council Teleconference 11:00 UTC This is however an error on the calendar page as can be seen by the entry noting the due date for motions and documents for the next Council meeting: 19 January Motions and Documents Due for GNSO Council Meeting 29 January Would you please let me know as soon as possible if you have any objection to maintaining the intended usual day and time for the next Council meeting, that is, Thursday 29 January at 11:00 UTC instead of Wednesday 28 January as erroneously noted on the calendar page. We would like to settle the date as soon as possible, so please give this your urgent attention. Thank you very much and apologies for this confusion. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

FW: Next Council meeting
by Glen de Saint Géry 16 Jan '15

16 Jan '15

Dear Councillors, Further to the note below, and having heard no objections and in consultation with the chair, Jonathan Robinson, the next Council meeting will be on Thursday, 29 January at 11:00 UTC. This is also to give you notice that the reports, motions and documents for consideration are due no later than (NLT) 10 days in advance (i.e. MONDAY, 19 January 2015 at 23:59 UTC) of the GNSO Council meeting on 29 December 2015 at 11:00 UTC. Motions should be sent to the Council mailing list and will then be posted on the Wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+29+January+… Thank you very much. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org From: Glen de Saint Géry Sent: vendredi 16 janvier 2015 11:46 To: Council GNSO Subject: Next Council meeting Dear Councillors, On the Council call yesterday it was mentioned that the next Council meeting would be on 28 January 2015 at 11 :00 UTC which is a Wednesday. http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#jan 28 January GNSO Council Teleconference 11:00 UTC This is however an error on the calendar page as can be seen by the entry noting the due date for motions and documents for the next Council meeting: 19 January Motions and Documents Due for GNSO Council Meeting 29 January Would you please let me know as soon as possible if you have any objection to maintaining the intended usual day and time for the next Council meeting, that is, Thursday 29 January at 11:00 UTC instead of Wednesday 28 January as erroneously noted on the calendar page. We would like to settle the date as soon as possible, so please give this your urgent attention. Thank you very much and apologies for this confusion. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Next Council meeting
by Glen de Saint Géry 16 Jan '15

16 Jan '15

Dear Councillors, On the Council call yesterday it was mentioned that the next Council meeting would be on 28 January 2015 at 11 :00 UTC which is a Wednesday. http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#jan 28 January GNSO Council Teleconference 11:00 UTC This is however an error on the calendar page as can be seen by the entry noting the due date for motions and documents for the next Council meeting: 19 January Motions and Documents Due for GNSO Council Meeting 29 January Would you please let me know as soon as possible if you have any objection to maintaining the intended usual day and time for the next Council meeting, that is, Thursday 29 January at 11:00 UTC instead of Wednesday 28 January as erroneously noted on the calendar page. We would like to settle the date as soon as possible, so please give this your urgent attention. Thank you very much and apologies for this confusion. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org

3 2

GNSO Council Update for the Translation and Transliteration of Contact Information PDP WG
by Amr Elsadr 16 Jan '15

16 Jan '15

Hi, Following up on the update of the initial report of the translation and transliteration of contact information PDP WG, I thought it best not to paste the entire executive summary in this email. It’s quite long, and has several references in the footnotes that may be useful to look at, so please do look at the report (http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/gtlds/transliteration-contact-initial-15dec…), and encourage your respective groups to provide comments before the February 1st deadline. The public comment period announcement is here: https://www.icann.org/public-comments/transliteration-contact-initial-2014-… These are my personal notes, and if Lars and Julie can fill in any gaps I may have missed, I’d be grateful: First meeting of the working group was in August 2013. The working group was tasked with answering two chartered questions: Is mandatory transformation of contact information in the WHOIS database to a single common language and script desirable? Who should, in the view of the working group, bear the burden of transformation? The working group solicited input at an early stage in its deliberations and received input from: ALAC The European Commission The Government of Thailand The People’s Republic of China NCSG IPC FICPI (International Federation of Intellectual Property Attorneys) - This input was received very late, and was decided to be included as input to the public comment on the initial report All input was discussed in great detail by the working group members. Special attention was given to the ongoing work of the EWG on registration data services as well as the EWG on internationalised registration data services, both of which were relevant to the work of this working group. After review of community comments and extensive working group deliberations, the recommendations provided in the working group's initial report were provided for public comment. This was done in the absence of a formal consensus call, however, with the understanding that a majority of the working group members support these recommendation. They are also provisional recommendations pending review of comments submitted in the public comment period. That translation and transliteration of contact information should not be mandatory. Any new RDS contemplated by ICANN should allow for non-Latin script to be usable. Registrants should provide their contact information in the language/script appropriate for the language the registrar operates in Registrars and registries should assure that data fields are consistent and correctly tagged to facilitate future transformation if ever needed If registrars wish to transform contact data, this should be displayed in the WHOIS as additional fields along with the original information provided by the registrant The field names in the WHOIS should be translated into as many languages as possible Based on these recommendations, the question of bearing the burden of transformation is moot. The working group is asking for input specific to this question, especially from those providing input in favour of mandatory transformation. A formal consensus call of the working group members will be taken following discussions of any and all input provided during the public comment period, which will close on February 1st 2015. An announcement was made about a webinar to be held on January 16th 2015 (today at UTC 14:00) covering the findings in the initial report of the working group (http://gnso.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-09jan15-en.htm). If anyone has any questions, I’d be happy to try to answer them. Thanks. Amr

1 1

FW: Letter from Cherine Chalaby
by Jonathan Robinson 16 Jan '15

16 Jan '15

All, Please see attached from Cherine Chalaby. Jonathan From: Megan Bishop [mailto:megan.bishop@icann.org] Sent: 16 January 2015 00:21 To: jonathan.robinson(a)ipracon.com Cc: Cherine Chalaby; ceo(a)auda.org.au; Jamie Hedlund; Mary Wong; jrobinson(a)afilias.info Subject: Letter from Cherine Chalaby Dear Jonathan, Attached please find a letter from Cherine Chalaby regarding the NGPC's meeting with the GAC to discuss IGO protections. Regards, Megan Megan Bishop Board Support Coordinator Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 12025 Waterfront Dr., Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 Mobile: +1-310-795-1894 Direct: +1-310-301-5808 One World. One Internet.

1 0

MP3 recording and chat transcript GNSO Council 15 January 2015
by Glen de Saint Géry 15 Jan '15

15 Jan '15

[To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org] Please find the MP3 recording of the GNSO Council teleconference held on Thursday, 15 January 2015 at: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-council-15jan15-en.mp3 as well as the Adobe chat transcript at: http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/transcript-chat-council-15jan15-en.pdf all on page http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#jan Thank you. Happy listening and reading! Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:gnso.secretariat@gnso.icann.org> http://gnso.icann.org

1 0

Response letter ICANN Board Resolution concerning planning for future gTLD Application Rounds - deadline Monday 19 January 18.00 UTC
by Marika Konings 15 Jan '15

15 Jan '15

As discussed during today's meeting, please provide any further comments / edits by Monday 19 January at 18.00 UTC. Note, I've added a sentence that I will hope address Gabriela's concern (if not, please feel to suggest edits). Following that, Jonathan will finalise the letter and submit it to the Board. Best regards, Marika From: Marika Konings <marika.konings(a)icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Date: Monday 12 January 2015 09:29 To: Council GNSO <council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: FW: [council] Draft response letter ICANN Board Resolution Concerning Planning for Future gTLD Application Rounds Dear All, As a reminder, please see attached the proposed response letter in relation to the ICANN Board Resolution concerning planning for future gTLD Application Rounds which includes proposed edits from Bret. If you have any further comments / edits, please feel free to share those ahead of the upcoming meeting on Thursday which has an agenda item dedicated to this topic. Best regards, Marika From: Bret Fausett <bret(a)nic.sexy<mailto:bret@nic.sexy>> Date: Thursday 11 December 2014 16:03 To: "council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>" <council(a)gnso.icann.org<mailto:council@gnso.icann.org>> Subject: Re: [council] Draft response letter ICANN Board Resolution Concerning Planning for Future gTLD Application Rounds Thank you, Marika. I have attached a very light redline to soften some of the wording that I thought could create a misunderstanding about what the Discussion Group is doing. As background for those not involved, we have used the Discussion Group simply to raise issues, not to think about solutions or policy recommendations. Any member of the group can raise an issue for inclusion, and we are not trying to reach consensus on what issues should be addressed or the possible policy outcomes. So I have recommended changing phrases such as "the DG is expressing concern...." to something like the "DG has raised the issue of...." because while one person may be concerned, I think it's too much to say that the group as a whole has that concern. Overall, it's an excellent letter and a fair summary of the DG discussions to date, but I would be more comfortable with the revisions attached. Thank you again, and please let me know if anyone has questions about this. Bret -- Bret Fausett, Esq. * General Counsel, Uniregistry, Inc. 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 200 * Playa Vista, CA 90094-2536 310-496-5755 (T) * 310-985-1351 (M) * bret(a)uniregistry.link<mailto:bret@uniregistry.link>, bret(a)nic.sexy<mailto:bret@nic.sexy> - - - - -

1 0